Lichtspiel Opus I (1921) - Walther Ruttmann

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024
  • Score by Max Butting (1920)

Комментарии •

  • @astrodome1994
    @astrodome1994 3 года назад +35

    Can't believe this is now a hundred years old!

  • @susanreeve3620
    @susanreeve3620 7 лет назад +28

    creativeness and original with its own life is endless just like each time and each person has their point of view. That's what makes the world go round.

  • @RatPfink66
    @RatPfink66 2 года назад +6

    "The official history of both experimental and abstract film begins with the premiere of Ruttmann’s first film, _Lichtspiel Opus 1 (Light-Play Opus 1),_ on April 21, 1921. Ruttmann was certainly aware of this himself when he wrote in the invitation to the work’s premiere of the beginning of a truly independent art of film. The critic Bernhard Diebold, who had already demanded abstract film in his writings, also wrote of a new motion art: 'Painting and music have wed.' [...] _Lichtspiel Opus 1_ is comprised of a thousand paintings that have been reproduced and colored by hand on the filmstrip. [...]
    "The music by Ruttmann’s friend Max Butting _(Opus 23_ for string quartet) was meticulously composed in correspondence to the film; indeed there are drawings by Ruttmann on the original score that outline the respective occurrences on the screen. It is interesting to note that Butting originally considered the music to be superfluous because he believed the film itself was visual music. From today’s perspective, however, the music appears to be necessary: without music, the dramatic aspects of the film have no impact. [...]
    "After black-and-white copies of the film - which were for the most part shown without sound - were in circulation for years, in 2005 the film was completely reconstructed in color."
    -Marcel Schwierin, www.see-this-sound.at/print/work/175.html

  • @EricMcDowellegm
    @EricMcDowellegm 4 года назад +9

    LOVE this score. . .haunting and beautiful.

  • @evocrim
    @evocrim 2 года назад +4

    If you are watching and thinking it's hypnotic ~ wait until the end for the pendulum effect.

  • @marthaguzman6790
    @marthaguzman6790 4 года назад +5

    Gran creación de quien sabe mucho de color, buena música, deleite para el espíritu

  • @MrRoraiminha
    @MrRoraiminha 3 года назад +7

    Nas aulas de design o professor nos apresentou Richter como o precursor do cinema abstrato. Pesquisando sobre Richter cheguei até esta obra de Ruttman. Ainda não sei quem foi o precursor do cinema abstrato, tampouco sei se é necessário cristalizar um fundador para uma arte que por si é tão livre, só sei que estou amando a experiência e desvendando saberes que não imaginei existir. Algumas vezes a vida é bela.

  • @claudiezeh
    @claudiezeh 5 лет назад +4

    C'est dur de vivre tout en étant en avance sur son temps, cela fait souffrir

  • @kevinwilliams2526
    @kevinwilliams2526 3 года назад +3

    Reading Animation: A world history vol.1 Ruttmann's animations are mentioned. Not what I expected. Interesting, but not what I expected.

  • @700x25
    @700x25 5 лет назад +4

    Grande função ao ar livre!
    Bailado de Cocteau com os barulhadores de Russolo!
    Opus 1921
    -Mario de Andrade

  • @monkeytennis7477
    @monkeytennis7477 Год назад

    So organically alive and vital! Love that you have left the scratches and speckles in the print instead of cleaning them off, it's just very natural looking. The music score is perfect. Thank you for posting this ❤️❤️❤️

  • @thegamesbrotherssvk5135
    @thegamesbrotherssvk5135 2 года назад +1

    Happy 100 year anniversary to this little flick

  • @1feloniouspunk
    @1feloniouspunk 12 лет назад +4

    Best version I've seen so far! Thanks so much!

  • @markokelly2494
    @markokelly2494 7 лет назад +6

    This would make a good companion piece for "Begone Dull Care".

  • @cedriko1662
    @cedriko1662 3 года назад +2

    apart from making it a very good movie I find it hard to believe that it is from nineteen million years ago ... I mean a century ago.

  • @MaluGuedelha
    @MaluGuedelha 4 года назад +3

    Que lindo!

  • @hallaabin5637
    @hallaabin5637 7 лет назад +1

    Terima kasih banyak .....

  • @palaiologos4441
    @palaiologos4441 6 лет назад +3

    "Zu Asche Zu Staub..."

  • @wuchi51
    @wuchi51 Год назад

    was this in B/W originally because thery didnt have color film yet per se. they had kinemacolor and other b/b with color added later

    • @dgc4059
      @dgc4059 Год назад +1

      The film wasn’t the colour, they used to paint over film to make it coloured, there are also loads of techniques to give film a certain colour and texture, so you couldn’t do much by using a camera but you could get a lot by developing the empty film (so it stays translucent), and then paint over it or add materials over it and run it through a projector.

  • @Madamnesia
    @Madamnesia 7 лет назад +2

    colori vibranti

  • @MaciejJanuszewski-p2k
    @MaciejJanuszewski-p2k 10 месяцев назад

    try to play with playback speed, have fun :D

  • @nigelmarshallkenyonabbott8684
    @nigelmarshallkenyonabbott8684 2 года назад +2

    Good intro. When does the movie start?

  • @EASMEDIA
    @EASMEDIA 5 лет назад +8

    can anyone explain how?

    • @joostdofferhoff4024
      @joostdofferhoff4024 5 лет назад +18

      To realize this new art form, Ruttmann came up with, and even patented, a kind of animation technique. Once a painter, always a painter, he found a way to make films using oils and brushes. As experimental animations scholar William Moritz described it, Ruttmann created Lichtspiel Opus I with images "painted with oil on glass plates beneath an animation camera, shooting a frame after each brush stroke or each alteration because the wet paint could be wiped away or modified quite easily. He later combined this with geometric cut-outs on a separate layer of glass."
      (from google -1 click)

    • @kellywalker1664
      @kellywalker1664 2 года назад

      @@joostdofferhoff4024 interesting. With the minimalism and primary colors, I figured it was painted directly onto the film with limited color photography at that time.

  • @Mrspluggerica
    @Mrspluggerica 11 лет назад +3

    isn't opus I from 1918-1919?

  • @abyadb
    @abyadb 13 лет назад +4

    Is this the original score?

  • @Seeuchan756
    @Seeuchan756 5 лет назад

    好牛逼啊

  • @abyadb
    @abyadb 13 лет назад

    Oh, sorry!

  • @Lotterkater
    @Lotterkater 8 лет назад +2

    Lesen müsste man können, dann würde das Ganze Lichtspiel nicht Lichtspiel, sondern richtig " Lustspiel opus 1 von Walther Ruttmann" heissen.

    • @scherflein
      @scherflein 7 лет назад +7

      Hej Kater, ich fürchte das Lesen altdeutscher Schrift solltest du nochmal üben. Da steht Lichtspiel, für Lustspiel müsste auf dem "u" (hier "ic") eine kleine, nach oben gebogene Klammer sitzen, kein i-Strich, die Bögen sind gleich. S und h sehen sich zwar ähnlich, aber ein altdeutsches S läuft nach unen gerade aus und wird nicht nach oben zurückgeschlungen. Wenn schon Klugscheißen, dann doch bitte richtig ;)