I consistently see the same thing repeated in these types of formats: 1) Leftist asks question. 2) Question is answered. 3) Leftist - "I don't really want to get into it."
"They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information, even if you prove that white is white and black is black you still cannot change the basic perception and illogical behavior. In other words, these people, the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible In future these people will be simply “pffft.” Squashed like cockroaches. Nobody’s going to pay them nothing for their beautiful noble ideas about equality. This they don’t understand and it will be greatest shock for them of course." ~Yuri Bezmenov 1984 ideological subversion
Crazy how she just stood there and made him define words. No debating, just using Ben as a dictionary...I literally do NOT understand what the point of this was....
@Jacob Bradford yes,it must be on her terms until she is wary of the subject,until then,she gonna stand there is and gum up the inner workings of the machinery,and no one else can contribute to to the forum.
@@allthethingsyouwillsee1081 Probably because that would result in an intellectual debate. These are the same people who believe certain political and social beliefs should be restricted and the people who believe them banned and banished from society.
Yep, I hate it when someone plays the "your definition" game and is unwilling to provide their definition. All she wants to do is ask him to open himself to attack while she refuses to offer the same. She is a narcissist... narcissists are natures natural victims. Professional or not... they all suck and speaking of sucking they suck the life and joy out of everything they orbit.
It's "her truth, his truth", her definition of a word, his definition of a word. In this video, he is open and honestly trying to come to a mutual understanding, she is not.
She does not want to come to a mutual understanding because that will jeopardize her power and her victimhood which is helping her in today's absurd Society to advance in life. Totally ludicrous!!
Much much evidence says cov-id sh-auts are a poy*son that will kiell you. See our website to see evidence and see why they do it. My RUclips name is a dotCom website and you need to go there. Expect your life to likely extremely change in 10 minutes or less.
@mustang607 "It's "her truth, his truth", her definition of a word, his definition of a word. In this video, he is open and honestly trying to come to a mutual understanding, she is not. " correction, its "her truth" vs The Truth, her, I assume, made-up definition of a word (which she would not tell anyone) vs the real, widely accepted, definition of a word, I've never understood the whole "my truth" thing, especially when it usually seems to run counter to "The Truth" the truth is usually an unobjective fact, but when someone talks about "my truth" they are usually lying or at least "creatively interpreting" the facts.
@@terryforsdyke306 , exactly. I was going to point out the same thing. It's not her definition vs his definition. It was her definition (opinion) vs the TRUE definition of the words. Which is why leftist refuse to give a definition.
@@williamphillips2671 Neither you, nor her, understand what one dimensional means. Her shallow, superficial contribution to the discussion smacks of her being one dimensional. At least Shapiro discusses the various aspects of each topic she inquired about and cares about the exchange of ideas. Whether you agree or not with what he says is irrelevant.
I think she does have definitions for all these words, but if she made any kind of concrete statement there would be a basis for debate and discussion. She's outclassed for that and she knows it, so she's looking for him to say something she can criticize him for.
she perfectly encapsulates the very definition of wokeness. "you're wrong because i say so, this is how i feel and i don't have to explain myself, you're just wrong"
LMAO, the woke also use wildly rare, radical hypotheticals that don't have much if anything to do with the discussion. Attempting to shame the other person, or agitate, &/or support their reasoning(most often for the pro-choice or modern feminist issues). Loved your comment;-)
Their opinions don't stand up to any form or critical thinking and are littered with inconsistencies. That's why they never "discuss" anything outside of their echo chambers. Only preach
@@brianlevine249 That's because they've been dumbed down their whole lives and they haven't the ability to show any type of argument when their feelings get questioned.. that's one dimensional in a nutshell.
She clearly has no idea of what she is saying, if she was living in Africa she wouldn't be worried about race baiting because she would be queuing for food and water because the corrupt bastards who run Africa are the problem.
Hmm... what was it that happened in the sixties that caused the dumbing down of students in public schools? Was it the merging of the Democrat party with Marxist and black nationalist ideology under LBJ?
YOUR ABSOLUTELY CORRECT if they have a hard time with a definition they should F'N look it up and go by that instead of trying to redefine a word to fit their narrative THEIR PATHETIC
@@jkwfo they’ve already done that with the definition of racism. There are several other words they’ve changed or added on to as well. Doesn’t mean anything though, I could care less about their (leftists) insecurities. I live in the real world.
Micheal Sisson Ii so her not being able to answer or debate him in any way shape or form makes everybodys comments stupid?.whoever you are quit being a troll.
@@littlej812 no the fact that Ben Shapiro needs to hear her definition is stupid because it's 100% irrelevant, which makes this guy's comment 100% stupid, you seen that you apparently can't get the link you are too 🤦. Not to mention it's already known that Ben Shapiro gets paid to why it's already been proven 😂🤣😂
@@littlej812 if you paid attention to Ben Shapiro at all you would know that as he would continually change his viewpoints on the same subjects (in other words whichever is most popular at the time for the cash).
Honestly, he has the patience of a saint. Teaching these students must be soul destroying. All so sure of themselves and yet all completely incapable of stringing together any sort of logically coherent argument.
@@brandiil8559 He is a spoiled, white boy , who grew up in Hollywood in a fantasy world thanks to daddy. If you want to kiss his behind, be my guest, I don't care. you people are dense and blind. Let me guess, Trump fan?🤣
he was talking wayyyyyy above her level of understanding, she realized it, knew that her definitions were the ones over simplified and were just a vehicle for her and others like her to claim victimhood, and that's why she wouldn't share her definitions, simple as that.
I don’t think she even knows what she is fighting for or she would want to speak her truth. Hopefully she will find her voice and learn to discuss instead of throwing the temper tantrum. She is showing she did not quite learn anything in school but copy the big words her professors taught her but beyond that there is nothing to object unless you are willing to discuss by bringing up what really you believe in. That was not a discussion and here we stand in this era and proves the point of where we are at this point.
@@FleeceNRun They are not playing a game though. They are basing everything off of how they feel. They have no actual substance to there arguments. I was like that and did not even know I was. The only difference and why I changed was because I always listen with an open mind. My uncle one day discussed political stuff with me and started to just ask me why. Over and over why. Then it got to where I had no why. That's how I got red pilled. The key was I am actually open minded like what a real liberal should be. The leftists are not liberal or open minded.
I don’t understand why this obviously articulate woman will not state her definitions. I highly doubt that is that she does not have definitions but for some reason is unwilling to state them.
She also calls him one dimensional but yet can’t or won’t even give her own specific definition(s) as to what any of these particular words mean from her point of view.
“If facts, logic, and scientific procedures are all just arbitrarily "socially constructed" notions, then all that is left is consensus--more specifically peer consensus, the kind of consensus that matters to adolescents or to many among the intelligentsia.” Thomas Sowell
Yep, no one can prove her wrong if she never shares an opinion. She just wants to give the impression that she knows better, without actually proving it.
This: She wants Ben Shapiro to define white privilege, tells him he's wrong, but won't tell him why he’s wrong? Come back when you’re ready to have a real debate.
@@wreagfe no...knowledge is. Anyone can speak a language, but not everyone possesses the knowledge to articulate their point of view and convey that power of which you are suggesting.
Can someone have him define "White Privilege" just cause I'm curious as to how he would define it, and I'm still trying to learn what it is outside a skin colored birth right of some kind. 🤷 (I literally was never taught what it is.)
@@Rejomei White privilege is a concept that caucasians have advantages they otherwise would not have due specifically to their skin color. Conversely non white people are disadvantaged more than they otherwise would be due specifically to their skin color.
@@frz7553 I think he has proven he is intelligent enough to have an open debate with anyone and everyone, his channel does not "school young kids" as you put it, he actively asks you to look at the reasons behind the logic. how can you not comprehend this? this guy is doing more good for america right now than creepshow Joe. Ben is actively trying to bring people together with his debates, while creepshow Joe is dividing america right down the middle!
You may have a point. But I don't think it was intelligence more than it was the lack of preparation in her approach. She was ill-prepared. I agree she should've stayed seated.
She thought she was the cats meow....she didn't even grasp a 1/3 of what Ben was saying...she went home like shit, I really don't know anything about this country
When we have common definitions of the words we use to communicate, we are a society. When groups make up their own definitions to words, we can no longer communicate, as this woman demonstrated. People like her no longer want to be members of mainstream society, but outcasts from society.
Thank u.. theres a chat im in where they are saying to defund means to take funds and move them to other areas which in the situation will give proper training to police 🤦. The definition means to stop recieving funds. I dont think these words mean what these people think. Its crazy.
Sex and Gender mean the exact same thing. English derives from two different languages Anglo Saxon and French (or so I heard at least), meaning we have to different words many of the same thing. Royal and Noble, Height and Altitude. Those are some examples, they mean the same thing. Same goes with "gender" and "sex", in fact gender shares the same root word the Latin word for "genitals", which I find ironic. The left took over the word "gender" and made the definition what they wanted. If a leftist says "gender is not associated with sex", they mean; "I believe gender is not associated with sex, and therefore you must also or you're a transphobe".
@pdpx To be fair they are not redefining everything, just the stuff that allows the other side to prove them wrong. @Kyo-Kun English derives from a lot of languages, also Royal and Noble do not mean the same thing, otherwise, I completely agree, I go into a bit more depth on both points below. English evolved from the language of the anglos, the Saxons, the Vikings, the Celts, Germanic tribes, the French, Latin, Spanish, and a bunch of other languages, it has also evolved over time, yes we did "borrow" more than a few words from the French (and the Gaelic before they became French), but they were only one of probably dozens of doner languages. Basically, as waves of migration come to England, or when we were invaded by the anglos, the Saxons, the Romans, the Vikings and the Normans, each invasion or wave of settlers brought a new language to this land, and when we invaded other countries (especially France, at one time one of the British King/Queen's titles was King/Queen of France), and later when nations joined the Empire/Commonwealth, we would decide we liked words they used, so start using them in England, so they became part of the English language, this has even happened with words invented in the USA, for example, some English language purists were horrified when the American word "Talented" started being used in England about a century and a half ago. Royal means a member of the Royal family, Noble (when referring to the nobility, it does have a few other uses including a noble deed, doing something because it is the right thing to do) means someone of the upper class so yes a royal is a noble, but the vast majority of nobles are not royals. Nobels are members of the aristocracy, there are thousands British of nobles, dozens of Royals, and only the current monarch, his/her spouse, and someone who was born to someone directly in line to the throne can use the title His/Her Royal Highness, current HRHs are the Queen, her children, heir to the throne Charles's wife Camilla, his son William (Harry and his wife Meghan gave up the HRH title when they withdrew from his Royal family duties, and even if they had not their children would not have been HRHs unless William and his children had all died), William's wife Kate and their children.
"I don't like your definition" "Ok then give yours." "no. I just want to criticize yours for being consistent by calling it 'basic'" "Ok so you don't want to have a consensus." "Your definitions are one dimensional." "Offer up yours then." *crickets*
“Everything white is oppressive.” This girl speaks well and obviously comes from a well to do family that was able to send her to college yet she clings to the victim/oppression narrative. It’s amazing really.
@@jjones797 I've found over the years that there is a great number of people who would rather be a victim than to be responsible and accountable for where they are and what they have achieved. It's almost like some people stop maturing mentally in their teens and just want a parental type authority to tell them what to do and to provide them with the necessities of life. It's kind of sad.
any word that i think doesnt praise me, is a micro aggression. insane. this was the construct to assume that barak obama being described as eloquent was offensive. 'why wouldnt he be eloquent.'
a refund? yes + an apology + $ settlement for destroying her mind + future pain, suffering & expenses her family will deal w when she moves back home (jobless).
Even if one were to make the argument for economic privilege that is also highly subjective. There is the case that someone whom is born to a well to do family does not attain the same value out of life as someone whom is from a poorer family and dropped out of highschool and started a business. All of these privilege statement imply that we apply some sort of subjective metric for what success and personal fulfillment are
The left is so materialistic and devoid of meaning in their lives. This won't change even if theur utopias were possible. Hence why it alwaus turns into gulags and genocide.
Funny how just recently B lack parents were blaming White and Asian parents for expecting MORE from their children... for expecting them to be successful. That was a form of r acism according to them. So... they expect us to "dumb down" the whole country instead of expecting 12% to move up and achieve. The problem comes from lack of parenting... something the left refuses to acknowledge or admit.
"I disagree. I don't know why, I don't know what exactly, all I know is that I disagree. Therefore you're wrong and should apologise." I would've thought that to only be in fiction. Seeing it unfold in reality is... depressing.
She took a few classes, really felt smart, and then was embarrassed pretty badly. I think she went to bed privately knowing his points were fair and valid and she has much more work to do as a social justice warrior. It would be nice to think she noted what he said and tried to explore those ideas from a different point of view, but I sincerely doubt that happened. This was cringe to the max for that young lady. How unfortunate this must live for eternity on the internet.
She can't give a definition because ALL her points are based on "feelings" which are constantly evolving, in some instances it's minute by minute. That's why leftist goalposts are always moving.
Even if there are definitions, those definitions will change as it suits their leftist needs and feelings. New words and phrases will also replace old ones. We don't hear about affirmative action anymore, but plenty about white privilege. BTW I don't qualify for either.
Harder to opportunistically redefine it in order to blame whites and absolve blacks for the same things unless you avoid defining it in the first place. Or just admit to defining it the way sjws define racism: white people being white.
Its funny how she did not want to cite "her" definitions. She just wanted to hear his, call him "one-dimensional" and not defend her position. Anyone who does not want to defend their position I am always suspicious of!
She disagrees because she was taught to disagree . She doesnt know why she actually disagrees. She was just taught his definition is wrong but not why its wrong . So therefore she has no idea why she disagrees with him.
It's okay to accuse others of being "wrong" or "one-dimensional" - but you don't have to explain or defend your position? Not only leftist, but sounds a bit like like communism to me. (Or is that definition too one-dimensional for you, you silly woman??) I don't know how Ben Shapiro doesn't lose his mind talking to these people. Much respect for him!
Just because you disagree with something, doesn’t make it “communism”. Here’s a dictionary definition of communism:- “a theory or system of social organization in which all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs”. However communist states interpreted that definition, there’s no way what that woman said can be classed as communist. I don’t know what you’d call it but no genuinely left wing advocates or right wing advocates for that matter are remotely worried about “trigger warnings”, “micro aggressions” or whatever the other term was. I doubt that level of fragility would be tolerated in any communist/Marxist regime. Call it what it is western first world narcissism.
@@colinstock325 The communist aspect about her attitude is the way she's neither interested in, nor open to honest debate. In her mind, she is right and he is bad and wrong and needs to be put in his place, because the end (some utopian future) justifies the means. That's the communist attitude right there. I know because I grew up and lived in a communist country. And for all those who would argue that it's actually Fascist, let me tell you that the two extremes eventually meet in that they both justify the trampling of human rights and brook no debate.
I long for the days when all people worried about was putting food on the table and having a roof over your head. People have too much time on their hands.
In case you didn't notice, the one that was multi-dimensional, dynamic and incorporating all the variables of the entire universe was the black lady... She resonated the profound wisdom and enlightenment of humanity's all knowing mother
Yes! It is foolish to argue with a person who is clearly more prepared for the argument than you are. You will not win, you will not change hearts or minds. All you will prove is that you were unprepared to debate at that level.
Because they don't like to face who and what they are and what they represent because it's too revealing of the frailties and lack of logic and ultimately bigotry
I have a red haired neighbour, it's cringe-worthy especially considering she's a son. I feel bad for him having to listen to all that BuzzFeed confusion, manhat|ng nonsense. I hope he grows up and leaves, becoming very happy and successful..... Instead of the weak, manipulated simp he's being trained for. Good luck, kid!
They are baiting Ben to claim a "gotcha" moment that makes Ben a shining example (in their Leftist world) of one facet of their false reality narrative.
Why do they even keep trying? They try to find a snag or a rip in his fabric, don't they know he's seamless? If you look up fair and balanced in the dictionary it's going to be a picture of Ben Shapiro as the definition.
"Nobody has the right to not be offended. That right doesn't exist in any declaration I have ever read. If you are offended it is your problem, and frankly lots of things offend lots of people." -Salman Rushdie
I like the way that she asked for a definition and when the logic of that definition was too logical to wrap her head around, she says, "Let's get back to that one in a minute because I want your definition of something else." She really had no response so she tried avoiding the conversation entirely. It's people like that who objectively annoy me.
If she actually had her own definitions and could defend them, in any way, she would have been happy to answer and then debate. But she clearly doesn’t.
I love Ben, as soon as he gives her an answer she can’t respond to without sounding like a fool she “steps past that one” because she, you know, “doesn’t want to take up anymore time”. But his answers are just so one dimensional. Gotta live progressives.
@@johnfoor8381 It's not even what you say that they object to, it is any fleeting expression that might pass across your face which they attribute to an emotion that they don't like. These people need to lock themselves into their own "safe space" and leave the rest of us alone.
She has no intentions of having a conversation with you her only intent which is clearly obvious is to attempt to chastise you for your beliefs and point you out as a bigot and they do this because they know did their logic falls apart in deep held conversations so she'd rather just try to persecute your character in an intent to paint all your statements as that made from someone of low character and low core moral values
Yup... she asks him for answers and when he gives them, she criticizes the answers while offering none of her own. It's telling someone "You're wrong, but I'm not going to tell you why you're wrong... I'm just going to insult you instead". Just the absolute WORST kind of person on the planet. It's the left's own peculiar brand of condescending narcissism from a place of ignorance.
@@Mr.Ekshin 💯% that's because none of their beliefs can stand on their own validity they already know this therefore they want to attack our character instead of attacking the actual belief and attempting to prove it wrong they'd rather just paint the people that have that belief as horrible human being therefore we don't have to listen to their beliefs because they're based in hate which is the exact opposite of reality because the truth is the Democratic party are the ones that push an Insight emotionally fueled belief
You're right. Unfortunately, some people want to be angry, offended or to feel victimized. It makes them feel temporarily stronger, and has become trendy. Finding subjective definitions just traps people in that negative state. Maybe no one ever taught her that all Humans have value, and she doesn't have to try to bring others down to elevate herself.
This is what is wrong with most people today! Just because you feel a word means something else doesn't mean it ACTUALLY means something else lol I mean if any Man tried to say they thought the definition of Rape was roleplay between two consenting adults and therefore Rape wasn't an issue people would loose their minds!
Your right that is brave to stand up and when you can’t even have a conversation with him about it because you don’t have the intelligence to do it. So your right she’s much more brave then myself😘😘lol
I disagree with how she went about this, but not that particular part. She's right in figuring out what his definitions are, because it should help her figure out why he has some of the stances that he does. Unfortunately, she's not experienced enough with these types of conversations with people like Shapiro. It's a little silly to see these types of videos because it's always an experienced right-wing debater vs. a random college student. Shapiro typically sounds way dumber when he's against someone who understands the arguments the student wants to make.
@@Goomsies Oh really? Where can I see some examples of Ben sounding “way dumber” as you say? And why didn’t she dare not give her definitions to “help her figure out why he has some of the stances that he does”?
@@David-kk4dr Trust me, it's not super difficult to find clips of Shapiro getting completely steamrolled by people who aren't unprepared college kids waiting in line to ask one question. You can look up some of his most embarrassing moments if you want, like his "you think they won't sell their homes" remark on rising ocean levels or his argument with (I think) David pakman about how people should have guns to fight back against the government. I'm sure that sounds reasonable at first, but anyone who's talked about it for a couple minutes understands that it's not. There are tons of videos out there pointing out how disingenuous he is in many of his speeches and debates, as well as how much information he seems to make up on the spot. Shapiro speaks confidently, so it's not immediately obvious when he says something really silly. It's easy to see why so many people have a hard time seeing through it.
He shuts them up and they clearly are aware of their stupidity but they continue. I love this young man he will be instrumental in bringing this country back to its original characteristics. There's your subjective microaggression LOL
![ATEEZ(에이티즈) - [GOLDEN HOUR : Part.2] Preview](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/X4PfgRPBUVo/mqdefault.jpg)
She showed what micro aggression is by telling him his answer was simplistic
She was trying to be oversmart.
She was trying to be condescending but she only managed to show her stupidity. 🤣
@@kaberigomes2117 Smart² 🤣🤣
Ben responded in the only terms her sanctimonious @$$ could understand, simple!
Words are violence! Arrest her!
She wants to feel above him, that’s all. He speaks directly, she speaks in unintelligible platitudes.
She's Perry! Perry the platitude!
AGENT P!
I found her to be incredibly condescending as well
Like leftists everywhere.
She's a typical Liberal who wants to talk "as if" intelligent, but never solve anything or come to a consensus.
Is this the definition of a Karen?
I consistently see the same thing repeated in these types of formats:
1) Leftist asks question.
2) Question is answered.
3) Leftist - "I don't really want to get into it."
Can't accept the truth just a blind reality
They tend to resort to "I don't really want to get into it" when they're losing. Or they go for, "Wrong. You're wrong. You're just wrong."
Because they can NEVER defend their positions beyond "I feel..."
"They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information, even if you prove that white is white and black is black you still cannot change the basic perception and illogical behavior. In other words, these people, the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible
In future these people will be simply “pffft.” Squashed like cockroaches. Nobody’s going to pay them nothing for their beautiful noble ideas about equality. This they don’t understand and it will be greatest shock for them of course."
~Yuri Bezmenov 1984 ideological subversion
Feelings over facts is their mantra, it's pathetic and literally intellectually bankrupt.
Poor thing - She's definitely unable to comprehend ANYTHING that Shapiro is saying.
"I'm just gonna step around that for now"
Yup, at 3:50 you can see she's completely lost 😂
Thus her being in college. This interaction with Ben could be life changing for her. :)
@@MrWolfheart111 probably not she just wants to be a victim and she thinks her opinions are the correct definitions
🤣🤣🤣 true
He breaks it down,she can't ,she has no real opinion only to disagree
Pretty typical woman
@@cornelius8617 I would add "democrat voting" before "woman".
The republican women I know don't hide like the democrats.
Typical
"Anyone can make something so complicated, but it takes a genius to make it simple"
'The relativity guy i think'
Exactly. There's no idea, just aggression.
Crazy how she just stood there and made him define words. No debating, just using Ben as a dictionary...I literally do NOT understand what the point of this was....
She wanted to insult Shapiro without coming off as an idiot. She failed miserably on both fronts.
Pointlessness is the point of the progressive left.
@T. Williams It's Cambodia .... for THE WEST
Made him give definitions just so she could disagree without giving her opinion. How helpful aye...
@Jacob Bradford yes,it must be on her terms until she is wary of the subject,until then,she gonna stand there is and gum up the inner workings of the machinery,and no one else can contribute to to the forum.
Poor girl doesn’t even know her definitions of the things she wants to argue over.
She sure does act like she does. Notice the arrogance.
@@johnfoor8381 yea, thats the micro aggression their talking about LOL
@@johnfoor8381 really why could she never articulate the definitions then?
@@allthethingsyouwillsee1081 Probably because that would result in an intellectual debate. These are the same people who believe certain political and social beliefs should be restricted and the people who believe them banned and banished from society.
Thank you doctor Howard. A mentor to Mr. Fifty fifty who is the best spin artist bamboozle of our young students. Have a nice day.
She’s got her own opinions that she confuses as definitions.
Exactly
The problem is liberals want to change the meanings of words to keep people dumb
that's how leftists are. they don't believe in the objective truth except when it comes to racism for some reason. oh and let's go brandon.
They already changed the definitions of words like gender, racism and vaccines.
@@jack-of-all-trades1234 don’t forget “my body my choice” has an entirely different meaning now also. Hypocrites!
Maybe he should give her his definition of a "professional victim."
All he'd have to do is put a mirror in front of her to provide that definition
@@kylestabler3474 she is going to school to learn how to be a professional victim. She is a victim in training.
Yep, I hate it when someone plays the "your definition" game and is unwilling to provide their definition. All she wants to do is ask him to open himself to attack while she refuses to offer the same. She is a narcissist... narcissists are natures natural victims. Professional or not... they all suck and speaking of sucking they suck the life and joy out of everything they orbit.
The victim generation
@@jebuschrist9161 In the past I would, more than likely, find that amusing. Now it is just scarily true.
It's painfully obvious that she delivered herself to a battle of wits unarmed.
And with no armour to deflect his deadly verbal weapons!
She had notes just can't read that good,but she probably graduated,
It's "her truth, his truth", her definition of a word, his definition of a word. In this video, he is open and honestly trying to come to a mutual understanding, she is not.
She does not want to come to a mutual understanding because that will jeopardize her power and her victimhood which is helping her in today's absurd Society to advance in life. Totally ludicrous!!
That's called "Relativism". A severe cancer and a much greater threat to our society than Q, Neo-Nazis, Donald Trump.
Much much evidence says cov-id sh-auts are a poy*son that will kiell you.
See our website to see evidence and see why they do it.
My RUclips name is a dotCom website and you need to go there.
Expect your life to likely extremely change in 10 minutes or less.
@mustang607 "It's "her truth, his truth", her definition of a word, his definition of a word. In this video, he is open and honestly trying to come to a mutual understanding, she is not. "
correction, its "her truth" vs The Truth, her, I assume, made-up definition of a word (which she would not tell anyone) vs the real, widely accepted, definition of a word, I've never understood the whole "my truth" thing, especially when it usually seems to run counter to "The Truth" the truth is usually an unobjective fact, but when someone talks about "my truth" they are usually lying or at least "creatively interpreting" the facts.
@@terryforsdyke306 , exactly. I was going to point out the same thing.
It's not her definition vs his definition. It was her definition (opinion) vs the TRUE definition of the words. Which is why leftist refuse to give a definition.
"Your definitions are one-dimensional." Well yours are non-existent, so they're zero-dimensional.
😆🤣😂👏🏻🥳🤣
Haha
@Brian Roome ahhhhhhhhhhhh!. Ahhahahahahahahahaahaahahahahahahhhahhhaaaaaaaaaaa! Haha😆😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Bk price, you are man, myth, and legend, my bruden.
She doesn't want to have to say anything because she knows she will be wrong.
Its far easier the be the inquisitor when you yourself do not have to answer questions.
Or maybe she wants his answers so he can explain himself how one dimensional he is by his own ways. Which he is
@@williamphillips2671 did you listen to his responses ? what did you think ?
@@williamphillips2671 if so, you should be able to explain why and give your own, better definition
@@williamphillips2671 Neither you, nor her, understand what one dimensional means. Her shallow, superficial contribution to the discussion smacks of her being one dimensional. At least Shapiro discusses the various aspects of each topic she inquired about and cares about the exchange of ideas. Whether you agree or not with what he says is irrelevant.
She doesn’t have a definition for all those made up BS words, that’s why she cannot have a conversation with Ben!
@Mike Long 😂😂😂😂😂So true!
I think she does have definitions for all these words, but if she made any kind of concrete statement there would be a basis for debate and discussion. She's outclassed for that and she knows it, so she's looking for him to say something she can criticize him for.
Nailed it
Oooga Boooooooga
She won't give out her own definition because she doesn't want the game played on her.
she perfectly encapsulates the very definition of wokeness.
"you're wrong because i say so, this is how i feel and i don't have to explain myself, you're just wrong"
Correct!!
She is, clearly, intellectually vapid and sophomoric.
You are absolutely correct and I just commented she should be the poster girl for Wokeness lol.
LMAO, the woke also use wildly rare, radical hypotheticals that don't have much if anything to do with the discussion. Attempting to shame the other person, or agitate, &/or support their reasoning(most often for the pro-choice or modern feminist issues). Loved your comment;-)
That's not wokeness. That is the emotional and mental weakness of 80 to 90% of black people in America of slave descendants...
I’ll bet she was offended by his inability to dumb down his intelligence to her level…….
And that was only the 6th thing that she was offended by that day
Obviously, Ben’s intelligence is a privilege and him making it known is a micro aggression.
She’s clearly unhappy she is black and needs validation from others that she is right.
She’s microaggressive and projects it onto him.
Let’s all pray for her future husband and children.
I'm sure this woman will be in the Senate one day. God save us!
Not a chance in Hell! But I bet she'll take my order at the McDonald's drive through one day.
I'm saying!!! Sheila Jackson Lee and Maxine Waters!!! I R Not Brite but I can holler dumb all day!!!
the left already have four nobody can stand, LOL
Or she will be a teacher screwing up some poor kid's mind.
No doubt...she'll be sharing deep thoughts with Liz Warren, Mazie Hirono and
Patty Murray.
They're like vampires exposed to sunlight: Their "ideas" turn to dust.
I love it when people that are one dimensional try to call Ben one dimensiona!!
@Jon Lyman Awesome. Best definition ever of a leftist...🤣😂🤣
Their opinions don't stand up to any form or critical thinking and are littered with inconsistencies. That's why they never "discuss" anything outside of their echo chambers. Only preach
@@brianlevine249 That's because they've been dumbed down their whole lives and they haven't the ability to show any type of argument when their feelings get questioned.. that's one dimensional in a nutshell.
She clearly has no idea of what she is saying, if she was living in Africa she wouldn't be worried about race baiting because she would be queuing for food and water because the corrupt bastards who run Africa are the problem.
These people are so lost and unable to use their own brain to critically think for themselves
You can thank the public school system for that! They've been dumbing down the students since the sixties!!!
They weren’t taught those skills. They were taught how to placate to advance.
If all Ben does, is make them THINK out of their boxes....critical thinking !
Hmm... what was it that happened in the sixties that caused the dumbing down of students in public schools?
Was it the merging of the Democrat party with Marxist and black nationalist ideology under LBJ?
What do you mean, "these people"!!!
😂😂😂😂
He tries to help them so much, and they just can't help themselves.
Whats the point in her questions? She should consult a dictionary and stop wasting everybody's time.
Do college students know how to use a dictionary?
You can't virtue signal and victimhood ology to an inanimate object
YOUR ABSOLUTELY CORRECT if they have a hard time with a definition they should F'N look it up and go by that instead of trying to redefine a word to fit their narrative THEIR PATHETIC
you just watch thats what they will do , take control of the dictionary and redefine every word
@@jkwfo they’ve already done that with the definition of racism. There are several other words they’ve changed or added on to as well. Doesn’t mean anything though, I could care less about their (leftists) insecurities. I live in the real world.
She doesn’t have a definition… that’s why she isn’t telling you Ben lol
I love how stupid you people are I love watching these comments 😂🤣😂
Micheal Sisson Ii so her not being able to answer or debate him in any way shape or form makes everybodys comments stupid?.whoever you are quit being a troll.
@@littlej812 no the fact that Ben Shapiro needs to hear her definition is stupid because it's 100% irrelevant, which makes this guy's comment 100% stupid, you seen that you apparently can't get the link you are too 🤦.
Not to mention it's already known that Ben Shapiro gets paid to why it's already been proven 😂🤣😂
@@littlej812 if you paid attention to Ben Shapiro at all you would know that as he would continually change his viewpoints on the same subjects (in other words whichever is most popular at the time for the cash).
@@littlej812 but either way I'm here for the comedy side give me something to laugh at 🥱
She didn't want to give her definition because she knows Ben would just destroy her
Cos it's not her definition. It's her teachers.
@@philpants44 let her teachers come to the party too, I'd enjoy that
Like he did?
She has no definitions, she's mindlessly parroting what she was told.
@@PoliticusRex632 No.. he did... she didn't.
Honestly, he has the patience of a saint. Teaching these students must be soul destroying. All so sure of themselves and yet all completely incapable of stringing together any sort of logically coherent argument.
Agreed
🤣🤣🤣 he's a rich a/hole. With an entitled attitude.
@@lorelailaval7676 no, he’s not. He’s worked hard to get where he is today.
@@brandiil8559 He is a spoiled, white boy , who grew up in Hollywood in a fantasy world thanks to daddy. If you want to kiss his behind, be my guest, I don't care. you people are dense and blind. Let me guess, Trump fan?🤣
@@lorelailaval7676 You sound like the questioner in the video...haha
he was talking wayyyyyy above her level of understanding, she realized it, knew that her definitions were the ones over simplified and were just a vehicle for her and others like her to claim victimhood, and that's why she wouldn't share her definitions, simple as that.
She can't even express her point and just resorts to denouncing his definitions. Yet, she feels morally superior. What a disgrace.
Leftists love to play that game called "I Obviously Know More Than You... So Lets Not Get Into It"
What a waste of tuition money. I’m so glad I didn’t get exposed to this crap when I was in college.
I don’t think she even knows what she is fighting for or she would want to speak her truth. Hopefully she will find her voice and learn to discuss instead of throwing the temper tantrum. She is showing she did not quite learn anything in school but copy the big words her professors taught her but beyond that there is nothing to object unless you are willing to discuss by bringing up what really you believe in. That was not a discussion and here we stand in this era and proves the point of where we are at this point.
Does that make her a disgracist?
@@FleeceNRun They are not playing a game though. They are basing everything off of how they feel. They have no actual substance to there arguments. I was like that and did not even know I was. The only difference and why I changed was because I always listen with an open mind. My uncle one day discussed political stuff with me and started to just ask me why. Over and over why. Then it got to where I had no why. That's how I got red pilled. The key was I am actually open minded like what a real liberal should be. The leftists are not liberal or open minded.
Funny shit...she talks about his ideas and doesnt give hers and calls HIM one dimensional
To be fair, they're not her ideas.
Lol, so true!! You can't be more one dimensional then saying someone's ideas are wrong without having any yourself
Hypocrisy at its finest
@@kamiphenonymous2855 they are if she holds to ...wait for it ........her ideas.
Are you saying she has no ideas?
lol
oooohohoohoooohooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhbhhhhhhhoooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhoooooooohoohohohoohoohohoohoohohohoho!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She doesn't have a definition of anything, she just wants to be a victim.
Facts
She just wants to contradict him, no matter what he says. Her opinion is formed.
I agree.
Playing victim keeps you down more than being an actual victim
I don’t understand why this obviously articulate woman will not state her definitions. I highly doubt that is that she does not have definitions but for some reason is unwilling to state them.
She calls him “one dimensional” all while she is admittedly being “no dimensional”!
@price mitchell I can feel that micro aggression...when that 1st deuce of the morning hits.
She also calls him one dimensional but yet can’t or won’t even give her own specific definition(s) as to what any of these particular words mean from her point of view.
@@rockonallnight She just wanted her moment at the microphone, she can't handle the likes of Ben Shapiro!
@@NewBluesBros Hahaha! Good one! In that case I just had a micro aggression this morning.
@@rockonallnight she doesn’t have a definition or else she would have told him. My definition of her is🤪
They get lost in his explanations. They aren't intelligent enough to follow.
Med cram
Lol, they really do. They aren't used to logic and truth.
Or too offended to follow
That part comes in semester three of their liberal arts major when the professors have had a chance to come up with an answer
What a pretender. She never intended to get an answer to any of her questions. She is engaged in confirmation bias.
“If facts, logic, and scientific procedures are all just arbitrarily "socially constructed" notions, then all that is left is consensus--more specifically peer consensus, the kind of consensus that matters to adolescents or to many among the intelligentsia.” Thomas Sowell
@Larry Bush Stop!!! "Jazz Hands"....I almost spit my coffee all over my laptop.
@@gertexan I recommend _not_ drinking while reading
She just wanted some attention. Bless her heart.
She obviously didn't do her homework on Ben. She wanted a "gotcha" moment but Ben saw it coming from a mile away.
"We won't get into that but moving on" Because you have NOTHING to say to him AT ALL🤣
Yep, no one can prove her wrong if she never shares an opinion. She just wants to give the impression that she knows better, without actually proving it.
“Im just going to step over that one ,because I……”
This: She wants Ben Shapiro to define white privilege, tells him he's wrong, but won't tell him why he’s wrong? Come back when you’re ready to have a real debate.
This isn't about debate or rational intetactions. It's about power. Language is a means to coerce others or dominate into submission.
@@wreagfe no...knowledge is. Anyone can speak a language, but not everyone possesses the knowledge to articulate their point of view and convey that power of which you are suggesting.
Can someone have him define "White Privilege" just cause I'm curious as to how he would define it, and I'm still trying to learn what it is outside a skin colored birth right of some kind. 🤷
(I literally was never taught what it is.)
@@Rejomei White privilege is a concept that caucasians have advantages they otherwise would not have due specifically to their skin color. Conversely non white people are disadvantaged more than they otherwise would be due specifically to their skin color.
This woman wasn’t intelligent enough to be having a conversation with Ben. It was quite obvious. Sit down.
@@frz7553 I think he has proven he is intelligent enough to have an open debate with anyone and everyone, his channel does not "school young kids" as you put it, he actively asks you to look at the reasons behind the logic. how can you not comprehend this? this guy is doing more good for america right now than creepshow Joe. Ben is actively trying to bring people together with his debates, while creepshow Joe is dividing america right down the middle!
@@frz7553 you are so cute lol ofc he can debate with intelligent people
O, man, .. i just posted this, almost word for word.. lol. ;)
You may have a point. But I don't think it was intelligence more than it was the lack of preparation in her approach. She was ill-prepared. I agree she should've stayed seated.
She thought she was the cats meow....she didn't even grasp a 1/3 of what Ben was saying...she went home like shit, I really don't know anything about this country
When we have common definitions of the words we use to communicate, we are a society. When groups make up their own definitions to words, we can no longer communicate, as this woman demonstrated. People like her no longer want to be members of mainstream society, but outcasts from society.
She obviously loves playing the victim...
This is exactly it! How can anyone reach agreement if they can’t communicate based on a shared language and definitions.
Imagine just taking the dictionary and redefining EVERYTHING in it just to suit YOU. God, these people, man... 🤦♂️
Thank u.. theres a chat im in where they are saying to defund means to take funds and move them to other areas which in the situation will give proper training to police 🤦. The definition means to stop recieving funds. I dont think these words mean what these people think. Its crazy.
I can't stand the usage of "reprogramming funds". That sentence is a micro aggression against ex-programmers.
Sex and Gender mean the exact same thing. English derives from two different languages Anglo Saxon and French (or so I heard at least), meaning we have to different words many of the same thing. Royal and Noble, Height and Altitude. Those are some examples, they mean the same thing. Same goes with "gender" and "sex", in fact gender shares the same root word the Latin word for "genitals", which I find ironic. The left took over the word "gender" and made the definition what they wanted. If a leftist says "gender is not associated with sex", they mean; "I believe gender is not associated with sex, and therefore you must also or you're a transphobe".
@pdpx
To be fair they are not redefining everything, just the stuff that allows the other side to prove them wrong.
@Kyo-Kun
English derives from a lot of languages, also Royal and Noble do not mean the same thing, otherwise, I completely agree, I go into a bit more depth on both points below.
English evolved from the language of the anglos, the Saxons, the Vikings, the Celts, Germanic tribes, the French, Latin, Spanish, and a bunch of other languages, it has also evolved over time, yes we did "borrow" more than a few words from the French (and the Gaelic before they became French), but they were only one of probably dozens of doner languages.
Basically, as waves of migration come to England, or when we were invaded by the anglos, the Saxons, the Romans, the Vikings and the Normans, each invasion or wave of settlers brought a new language to this land, and when we invaded other countries (especially France, at one time one of the British King/Queen's titles was King/Queen of France), and later when nations joined the Empire/Commonwealth, we would decide we liked words they used, so start using them in England, so they became part of the English language, this has even happened with words invented in the USA, for example, some English language purists were horrified when the American word "Talented" started being used in England about a century and a half ago.
Royal means a member of the Royal family, Noble (when referring to the nobility, it does have a few other uses including a noble deed, doing something because it is the right thing to do) means someone of the upper class so yes a royal is a noble, but the vast majority of nobles are not royals. Nobels are members of the aristocracy, there are thousands British of nobles, dozens of Royals, and only the current monarch, his/her spouse, and someone who was born to someone directly in line to the throne can use the title His/Her Royal Highness, current HRHs are the Queen, her children, heir to the throne Charles's wife Camilla, his son William (Harry and his wife Meghan gave up the HRH title when they withdrew from his Royal family duties, and even if they had not their children would not have been HRHs unless William and his children had all died), William's wife Kate and their children.
I tried that with the spelling of the words in like 2nd grade....it didn't work for me probably would today so sadly I was born WAY to early.
Kudos to Ben for tolerating her condescending attitude with grace and patience.
racist
@@lorelailaval7676 wtf r u smoking
@@Hopefullythisnameisnottaken luckily good stuff, unlike you boy. Smooch!
Yes. Shem was deff. Racist…!
@@lorelailaval7676 Ha ha ha! You win the argument! Fantastic job! Ha ha ha ha ha...
"I don't like your definition"
"Ok then give yours."
"no. I just want to criticize yours for being consistent by calling it 'basic'"
"Ok so you don't want to have a consensus."
"Your definitions are one dimensional."
"Offer up yours then."
*crickets*
Shes so stupid, though that rack isn’t bad. Maybe the shirt is making it more then it actually is.
Ben is definitely not a basic bro but she is a basic b……
@@bibarel4665 nahh... it's the shirt.. and she makes them look ugly attached to that brain
@@bibarel4665 That "rack" sucks. I want a lean, athletic, toned physique. Like the build on the women in track and field in the Olympics.
... but I'm a woman _and_ I am black, so anything I say cannot possibly be questioned or challenged...
How ppl like her function in everyday life amazes me
Constantly offended and aggressive toward the world
@@Sassy-pants68 so a conservative
They can't function in everyday life! That's why they're always getting some kind of free assistance and bogus promotions.
Her definition is easy to explain. “Everything white is oppressive “.
@Overlord Ainz Holier than thou speaks.
She is very basic and her calling Ben Shapiro one dimensional is a big fat LOL.
You got it almost right. Her definition is easy to explain: everything oppressive is white.
“Everything white is oppressive.”
This girl speaks well and obviously comes from a well to do family that was able to send her to college yet she clings to the victim/oppression narrative. It’s amazing really.
@@jjones797 I've found over the years that there is a great number of people who would rather be a victim than to be responsible and accountable for where they are and what they have achieved. It's almost like some people stop maturing mentally in their teens and just want a parental type authority to tell them what to do and to provide them with the necessities of life. It's kind of sad.
She's all talking points and no critical thinking of her own.
She can't remember the last time she had a thought in her head that wasn't someone else's......
they all do that
CNN told her what to think. So she didn’t have to.
You just summed all these sjws up.
Lefty : Any word that doesn't praise me, is a micro-aggression.
I got a micro aggressive middle finger
any word that i think doesnt praise me, is a micro aggression. insane. this was the construct to assume that barak obama being described as eloquent was offensive. 'why wouldnt he be eloquent.'
That's called Narcissism. Get over yourself!
@@christopherbowlen254 tiny hands?
@@fantasticmrmonk minute
The irony is that she is an example of the terms that she wants Ben to define, except for replacing "white" with "black" on the first one.
That girl's parents deserve a refund from her college!
She's clearly learning nothing useful! 🤣
a refund? yes + an apology + $ settlement for destroying her mind + future pain, suffering & expenses her family will deal w when she moves back home (jobless).
Parents ?!? You mean tax payer or scholarship fund.
she's not white so her single mother probably couldn't afford her tuition. let's go brandon.
She learned this shit from her parents long before college.
You mean the taxpayers right?...oh sorry that was a micro aggressive thing to say
“White achievement” isn’t “White privilege,” blame yourself for your own failure or the political party you support along with their bad policies.
Even if one were to make the argument for economic privilege that is also highly subjective. There is the case that someone whom is born to a well to do family does not attain the same value out of life as someone whom is from a poorer family and dropped out of highschool and started a business. All of these privilege statement imply that we apply some sort of subjective metric for what success and personal fulfillment are
The left is so materialistic and devoid of meaning in their lives. This won't change even if theur utopias were possible. Hence why it alwaus turns into gulags and genocide.
Funny how just recently B lack parents were blaming White and Asian parents for expecting MORE from their children... for expecting them to be successful. That was a form of r acism according to them.
So... they expect us to "dumb down" the whole country instead of expecting 12% to move up and achieve. The problem comes from lack of parenting... something the left refuses to acknowledge or admit.
@@stevesullivan9752 am black and find it funny when most black parents lacks accountability.
BINGO!!!
I love how she is talking condescendingly to someone that is 10x smarter than her.
You could add at least a couple of zeros to that number and be even more accurate. Ben was 10X smarter than she'll ever be when he was 6.
@@scottsanders5595 "It's not that liberals don't know anything, it's just that so much of what they know simply isn't true." - Ronald Reagan
@@VroodenTheGreat That's always been one of my favorite quotes.
100x more intelligent!
stupid people are too stupid to know they are stupid.
The moment he’d speak her brain would shut off. Then she blames him for her lack of understanding.
Her: keeps referring to "her" definition.
Also her: "I don't want to share my definition."
She’s the R word
Yes, I pick up on that too.
Look at the shoulders! that's a man
Yeah cause she doesn’t “feel” like it’s correct
@@paulyshore1942You mean R R.?
"I disagree. I don't know why, I don't know what exactly, all I know is that I disagree. Therefore you're wrong and should apologise."
I would've thought that to only be in fiction. Seeing it unfold in reality is... depressing.
Truly - he is actually looking for consensus
“I disagree” “why?” Unspoken “because my professors said I should and I believe everything they tell me to believe”.
She's just picking a fight and losing before she even gets started.
That's what happens when you show up to a battle of wits unarmed.
The accuser
She took a few classes, really felt smart, and then was embarrassed pretty badly. I think she went to bed privately knowing his points were fair and valid and she has much more work to do as a social justice warrior. It would be nice to think she noted what he said and tried to explore those ideas from a different point of view, but I sincerely doubt that happened. This was cringe to the max for that young lady. How unfortunate this must live for eternity on the internet.
They’re not going to tell you their definition, because it probably doesn’t makes any sense, and it’s based on feelings. 😂
She can't give a definition because ALL her points are based on "feelings" which are constantly evolving, in some instances it's minute by minute. That's why leftist goalposts are always moving.
Exactly!! These type of people are walking contradictions!
Even if there are definitions, those definitions will change as it suits their leftist needs and feelings.
New words and phrases will also replace old ones.
We don't hear about affirmative action anymore, but plenty about white privilege. BTW I don't qualify for either.
Harder to opportunistically redefine it in order to blame whites and absolve blacks for the same things unless you avoid defining it in the first place. Or just admit to defining it the way sjws define racism: white people being white.
Its funny how she did not want to cite "her" definitions. She just wanted to hear his, call him "one-dimensional" and not defend her position. Anyone who does not want to defend their position I am always suspicious of!
It just shows that they can't debate, and if they were to debate, they would get shredded!
@@donaldcannyjr1245 I'm pretty sure that was the best she could do, and yes - she failed miserably.
She disagrees because she was taught to disagree . She doesnt know why she actually disagrees. She was just taught his definition is wrong but not why its wrong . So therefore she has no idea why she disagrees with him.
Sounds like most if not all religious people :D
... can always be discounted and ignored.
It's okay to accuse others of being "wrong" or "one-dimensional" - but you don't have to explain or defend your position? Not only leftist, but sounds a bit like like communism to me. (Or is that definition too one-dimensional for you, you silly woman??) I don't know how Ben Shapiro doesn't lose his mind talking to these people. Much respect for him!
I think he was still young here. So his tolerance was still high.
Just because you disagree with something, doesn’t make it “communism”. Here’s a dictionary definition of communism:- “a theory or system of social organization in which all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs”.
However communist states interpreted that definition, there’s no way what that woman said can be classed as communist. I don’t know what you’d call it but no genuinely left wing advocates or right wing advocates for that matter are remotely worried about “trigger warnings”, “micro aggressions” or whatever the other term was. I doubt that level of fragility would be tolerated in any communist/Marxist regime. Call it what it is western first world narcissism.
@@colinstock325 The communist aspect about her attitude is the way she's neither interested in, nor open to honest debate. In her mind, she is right and he is bad and wrong and needs to be put in his place, because the end (some utopian future) justifies the means. That's the communist attitude right there. I know because I grew up and lived in a communist country. And for all those who would argue that it's actually Fascist, let me tell you that the two extremes eventually meet in that they both justify the trampling of human rights and brook no debate.
@@KyriaNunNuit Well said!! Thank you.
@@WatchfulListener tolerance = confidence
I long for the days when all people worried about was putting food on the table and having a roof over your head. People have too much time on their hands.
Thank capitalism and industrialization
“Your definition is 1 dimensional.”
“Relative to what?”
“It just is.”
I don't know how his definitions were 1-dimensional. He gave a long explanation on each definition while she refused to give her own definitions.
😀 right? Where's the "debate and discussion?"
In case you didn't notice, the one that was multi-dimensional, dynamic and incorporating all the variables of the entire universe was the black lady...
She resonated the profound wisdom and enlightenment of humanity's all knowing mother
@@mickeydrago9401 Explain please
@@mayatuck
Hyperbole
She is incredibly dismissive. Literally hand waving away things she doesn't like.
She wanted to debate what Ben said, but she didn't know how to.
the hand waving looks like microaggression hahhahahah
😂....yeah me & her would argue. She big. So I be packing lol....hehehehe
Man you guys are so one dimensional you didnt realize she was actually using "THE FORCE" to defend herself from the truth.
She doesn’t even know what those BS made up words mean, that is why she doesn’t have a definition for them!
She does not "think" of what those terms mean, she "FEELS" what those terms mean; hence, she cannot define them.
I'm sure its intimidating to try and respond against someone so well spoken.
She thought she wanted beef when she stood up but choked.
She thought she was going to match wits with Shapiro was her first mistake.
Yes! It is foolish to argue with a person who is clearly more prepared for the argument than you are. You will not win, you will not change hearts or minds. All you will prove is that you were unprepared to debate at that level.
Never argue facts with someone who feels Superior in their ignorance
it's the comfort they find in their ignorance that gives me a laugh
If a phrase like “micro-aggression has meaning to you, you are living a deeply privileged life.
We'll step by that one, dismissing him with a hand waive. Because, you're starting to make sense to me and I'm offended in my mind Ben.
She has ZERO argument against what he said, but yet tried to demean what he was saying. It's utterly laughable!!
That's because she and her ilk's only counter is their "lived experience," which inherently cannot be proven.
@@kingofthorns203 sounds like she’s pearl clutching and stereotyping.
The only one-dimensional thing here was her way to communicate.
nasty and racist. Reported. DA
Black privilege.
@@WLM-lf8ho Maybe....So? Ben has white, rich man privilege.
@@lorelailaval7676 ...Yes, you're completely and utterly correct. Sent to Ben from the heavens, he uses his Jewish Privilege against others 🤷♂️.
@@WLM-lf8ho Finally! Glad I was able to educate you:) happy Holidays!
His definitions are bang on what she believes that's why she can't respond.
Because they don't like to face who and what they are and what they represent because it's too revealing of the frailties and lack of logic and ultimately bigotry
I love when people attack Ben. Watching him destroy his challengers is beyond satisfying. It’s artistic
Imagine having an ideology or mindset entirely based off of what you hear/read on social media.
I have a red haired neighbour, it's cringe-worthy especially considering she's a son. I feel bad for him having to listen to all that BuzzFeed confusion, manhat|ng nonsense. I hope he grows up and leaves, becoming very happy and successful.....
Instead of the weak, manipulated simp he's being trained for.
Good luck, kid!
Welcome to generation snowflake.
Thats what we call them in the land down under
It's funny how they say personal experiences mean nothing. They believe what they hear more than what they see
Unfortunately this is being taught by many University Professors these days. So it's not just social media influencing their ideology.
Yes, it’s being spoon fed to them by their professors also.
She probably went home thinking,” I sure schooled him.”
🤣 most definitely
She did
She probably even posted about schooling him online.
😂😂 no doubt
They are baiting Ben to claim a "gotcha" moment that makes Ben a shining example (in their Leftist world) of one facet of their false reality narrative.
Why do they even keep trying? They try to find a snag or a rip in his fabric, don't they know he's seamless? If you look up fair and balanced in the dictionary it's going to be a picture of Ben Shapiro as the definition.
Ben Shapiro is so clear, sharp, and accurate and I love how he can be humorous when put in such a position.
Micro-aggression: I constantly look for, and take offence at everything, and that’s your fault.
"Nobody has the right to not be offended. That right doesn't exist in any declaration I have ever read.
If you are offended it is your problem, and frankly lots of things offend lots of people." -Salman Rushdie
Offense is taken, not given.
I like the way that she asked for a definition and when the logic of that definition was too logical to wrap her head around, she says, "Let's get back to that one in a minute because I want your definition of something else." She really had no response so she tried avoiding the conversation entirely.
It's people like that who objectively annoy me.
when i make the rules every card i get is wild. even if i loose i strut around like a pigeon and shit on everything.
If she actually had her own definitions and could defend them, in any way, she would have been happy to answer and then debate. But she clearly doesn’t.
I love Ben, as soon as he gives her an answer she can’t respond to without sounding like a fool she “steps past that one” because she, you know, “doesn’t want to take up anymore time”. But his answers are just so one dimensional. Gotta live progressives.
I feel oppressed every time she waves her hand through the air.
She learned that move from Her highness drunk ,prune face Nancy, queen of hell.
They really love their little buzzwords in their own alternate reality. ‘Micro-aggression’ is my personal favorite 😂.
Can you imagine trying to have a pleasant conversation with someone who’s always looking to find something you say offensive? It can’t be done.
@@johnfoor8381 It's not even what you say that they object to, it is any fleeting expression that might pass across your face which they attribute to an emotion that they don't like. These people need to lock themselves into their own "safe space" and leave the rest of us alone.
She has no intentions of having a conversation with you her only intent which is clearly obvious is to attempt to chastise you for your beliefs and point you out as a bigot and they do this because they know did their logic falls apart in deep held conversations so she'd rather just try to persecute your character in an intent to paint all your statements as that made from someone of low character and low core moral values
Yup... she asks him for answers and when he gives them, she criticizes the answers while offering none of her own. It's telling someone "You're wrong, but I'm not going to tell you why you're wrong... I'm just going to insult you instead". Just the absolute WORST kind of person on the planet. It's the left's own peculiar brand of condescending narcissism from a place of ignorance.
@@Mr.Ekshin 💯% that's because none of their beliefs can stand on their own validity they already know this therefore they want to attack our character instead of attacking the actual belief and attempting to prove it wrong they'd rather just paint the people that have that belief as horrible human being therefore we don't have to listen to their beliefs because they're based in hate which is the exact opposite of reality because the truth is the Democratic party are the ones that push an Insight emotionally fueled belief
You're right. Unfortunately, some people want to be angry, offended or to feel victimized. It makes them feel temporarily stronger, and has become trendy. Finding subjective definitions just traps people in that negative state. Maybe no one ever taught her that all Humans have value, and she doesn't have to try to bring others down to elevate herself.
Leftist: "YOu are oNe DimeNsIoNAL!"
Shapiro: *spits out 4d answers*
By "two different definitions" she means there is *THE* definition that Ben is stating Vs what she *FEELS* the words mean to her.
This is what is wrong with most people today! Just because you feel a word means something else doesn't mean it ACTUALLY means something else lol I mean if any Man tried to say they thought the definition of Rape was roleplay between two consenting adults and therefore Rape wasn't an issue people would loose their minds!
"I disagree" is not a counter point...
He’s so much smarter than the audience members. How many times does he have to humiliate these characters? Yet they continue to line up for it. Sad.
Doing the same thing expecting different results
Scary part is she left that room thinking she won a debate
“I’m going to ask you to define words then tell you you’re wrong but not explain how so that I make myself feel intellectually superior.”
She just wants to be a victim and doesn’t have the intelligence to actually have the conversation! Interesting lol
She’s braver than you! 🤣🤣🤣
@@shavanaealexandervlogs2603 troll much?
The Dunning Kruger effect allowed her the confidence to get up there and speak and try to make sense and create influence...
Your right that is brave to stand up and when you can’t even have a conversation with him about it because you don’t have the intelligence to do it. So your right she’s much more brave then myself😘😘lol
She’s young, she’s learning. Good on Ben to engage with young folk and give them a fair hearing and a serious answer for them to work through later.
Her argument sounded so good when she was in the "echo-chamber" with her constituents. My how it all went down in real time on the playing field.
Ha, he throws out some basic logic and she starts sputtering..
She is in way over her head here.
Not in her mind.
“How about this one:
Define passive-aggressive, Ben”
Ben: “Um…that would be YOU”
🤣🤣🤣🤣 microphone drop👏👏🤣🤣
Ooooohhhhhh!!!!!!!
Does he say "um"? I haven't heard that. Usually inarticulate people do that.
@@hijodelaisla275
You mean like Obama?…the king of “um”.
@@teamdawson1 What a wonderful opportunity for you. You're welcome.
The real problems come from a small group of people.
She goes to a debate and doesn't want to debate.
"Everything you just said: 1 dimensional."
"In what way?"
"Errr..."
"Exactly."
"We'll move on."
I'd have stopped her right there. You offer yours up, since you asked me for mine.
Imagine trying to make a case for trigger warnings and micro aggressions.
After Ben gives the definition, she THEN determines if it’s or “correct” according to HER thinking 🤔.
I disagree with how she went about this, but not that particular part. She's right in figuring out what his definitions are, because it should help her figure out why he has some of the stances that he does.
Unfortunately, she's not experienced enough with these types of conversations with people like Shapiro. It's a little silly to see these types of videos because it's always an experienced right-wing debater vs. a random college student. Shapiro typically sounds way dumber when he's against someone who understands the arguments the student wants to make.
@@Goomsies Oh really? Where can I see some examples of Ben sounding “way dumber” as you say? And why didn’t she dare not give her definitions to “help her figure out why he has some of the stances that he does”?
@@Goomsies ok smart guy… lmao. Some people on internet always think they are fking Einstein. Flipping burger in real life…
@@David-kk4dr Trust me, it's not super difficult to find clips of Shapiro getting completely steamrolled by people who aren't unprepared college kids waiting in line to ask one question. You can look up some of his most embarrassing moments if you want, like his "you think they won't sell their homes" remark on rising ocean levels or his argument with (I think) David pakman about how people should have guns to fight back against the government. I'm sure that sounds reasonable at first, but anyone who's talked about it for a couple minutes understands that it's not.
There are tons of videos out there pointing out how disingenuous he is in many of his speeches and debates, as well as how much information he seems to make up on the spot. Shapiro speaks confidently, so it's not immediately obvious when he says something really silly. It's easy to see why so many people have a hard time seeing through it.
@@Goomsies can you show me ONE?
He shuts them up and they clearly are aware of their stupidity but they continue. I love this young man he will be instrumental in bringing this country back to its original characteristics. There's your subjective microaggression LOL
When you think that only disagreeing qualifies as thinking.
If Ben is one dimensional then, necessarily, she is zero dimensional
She is negative dimensional
Her: "Define X."
Ben defines X.
Her: "WRONG. Define Y."
I find it offensive you only mentioned X and Y there are hundreds of letters. 😣
@@johnharrington11 Define H
She doesn't want to engage, she simply wants to say that Ben is wrong and disagree with him for the sake of it