@@TheSwedishInvestoris there a discord from your channel where we can hang out and talk/chat investments? Would be cool honestly, I think the community here is very nice for a long time
1) You don't have to look specifically for 100 to 1 stocks. You just have to look for companies that have the potential to grow tremendously. There is no way you can forecast whether a company will return 100 to 1. However, you can forecast that a company has the potential grow sales and profits over time, and will thus be a profitable investment. 2) Achieving 100 to 1 results is dependent on holding your positions long enough. The only absolute guarantee in investing is that you will never have a 100 to 1 stock if you take always profits when a stock gets to 2 to 1, or 10 to 1, or 30 to 1 or appears to be overvalued. 3) If you can't handle a highly concentrated portfolio where most of your portfolio is in only 2 or 3 stocks, you'll never be able to hold a stock until it hits 100 to 1. The reason I wrote 2 or 3 stocks rather than 1 is that by the time one of your stocks achieves 100 to 1, you will probably also have one or two that are at least 50 to one and another that is at least 30 to one. Most positions will have just average results and at least one will be a huge loss. 4) I've never had a 100 to 1 stock because I've always sold too soon. However, looking back on my investment career, had I never sold any of the stocks I bought, by now one would be over 100 to 1, one would be over 70 to 1, one over 60 to 1, one over 30 to 1, one over 20 to 1 and two over 10 to 1. I think there was only 1 would have gone to zero. I focused on companies that I though had the potential to grow tremendously. I did not focus, at all, on "a margin of safety." Consider this, if you had paid twice as much for a stock that achieved 100 to 1, you'd still have a 50 to 1 return! Great stocks rarely look fairly priced. At the time I bought them, I had never even heard of the 100 to 1 goal so it didn't even enter my mind. The three concepts that will prevent you from ever having a 100 to 1 stock, each so popular that it is by now accepted "wisdom" are A) You never go broke taking a profit, B) Bulls make money, bears make money, pigs get slaughtered, and 3) you must have a diversified portfolio. Ignore them.
Remember the one golden principle of statistic is "regression to the mean". I do not see that the earning alone can justify the speculative market value of the company beginning with a capital letter of N.
It is an interesting book and timepiece - I do feel that it is slightly outdated and simplified. Still worth a read to see how value investing and investing in general has been evolving.
Monish Pabrai recommended this book. I ended up buying a different one at the time called “100-bagger” or something and didn’t realize it was the wrong one until recently.
Well, here is an idea to chew on: In 1626, Minuit bought Manhattan Island for $24.00 worth of trinkets. If only the natives invested that amount of money at 8% annual return. The return today would be over $446 trillion!!! In 2021, Manhattan Island was estimated to be $1.4 trillion. I am just saying 😁
Great video as always. Since we found this channel, we watch all the videos, and to be honest we have already read most of the books that that you recommended in some of your videos, even the very old ones. Thanks and keep it up
Hello sir, I absolutely liked the video, and the way your teaching us if i can say that. I have a question witch is where can i start ? Can you please give me this advice ? By where i mean how ? After i watched your video it get me thinking of trying stocks. But i don't know where to start ! I am a student and i have some saved money, and i was think of, starting using it in such a way to balance the value lost with inflation. What do you think ? Thank you for all the personnes who will read this and maybe gived and advice ! And one more think, like and subscribe the the channel !
Hey, great video! :) I don't agree with you on the R&D point. Most companies, like Nvidia, are running thanks to their R&D. If Nvidia were to cut their R&D by 100%, you'd get your 11.7, no doubt. But that would be extremely short term and the price would probably reflect that immediately. What do you think?
I was going to comment the same thing on R&D. It really depends on the company. NVDA needs to constantly innovate in order to stay compatible, they can cut their R&D budget to increase earnings in the short term, but that will put them on the back foot in the long term, compared to competitors like AMD and INTL. This seems to be valid across all of the tech sector, where innovation is the way to keep your market share. Take a company like Disney though, their value comes mostly from IP, parks and streaming - I would not expect they would need much R&D to keep those businesses running or ahead of competitors. In short - for NVDA the high R&D budget IS their moat so to speak, without it the company would go down. This is not the case for every company so one would much rather a company that does not depend on their R&D to stay ahead.
I agree Orel Zilberman, maybe I expressed myself a little too strongly there. I don't believe that they can remove their R&D costs without implications on the business. I think the point is still valid though, someone who is spending money on R&D and everything else equal, it should be the better buy.
Hey buddy..your videos are awesome..can I translate and publish in my mother tongue(Tamil) ..In a way it will reach wider audience and we can also partner up
NVIDIA shaved years off my retirement year to date, though I would’ve been a millionaire few times over if my hedge landed instead 😂 😂, I do look for 100-1 but I use very little capital, maybe 5% 10%, but I’m old to, if I was younger or old and have no portfolio, first starting out I would probably allocate 40%-50%, I mean if you do your fundo and technos, it’s not gambling 😂 😂 or you can pull a Cathy wood and pull your funds right before it blows, and yes I agree with her that NVIDIA is too heavy and will fall but that’s what the hedge is for. She lost billions pulling that capital 😂
This channel is absolute pure gold, both in presentation and in information
Cheers Sonny Antoine, I appreciate the support a ton!
@@TheSwedishInvestoris there a discord from your channel where we can hang out and talk/chat investments? Would be cool honestly, I think the community here is very nice for a long time
This channel is 100 to 1. 👏A real gold mine.
Much love!
This is one of those channels that when he uploads, my unconsciousness takes over and clicks the video before I can act.
This is one of my top 2. Financial / stock market channel on RUclips
1) You don't have to look specifically for 100 to 1 stocks. You just have to look for companies that have the potential to grow tremendously. There is no way you can forecast whether a company will return 100 to 1. However, you can forecast that a company has the potential grow sales and profits over time, and will thus be a profitable investment. 2) Achieving 100 to 1 results is dependent on holding your positions long enough. The only absolute guarantee in investing is that you will never have a 100 to 1 stock if you take always profits when a stock gets to 2 to 1, or 10 to 1, or 30 to 1 or appears to be overvalued. 3) If you can't handle a highly concentrated portfolio where most of your portfolio is in only 2 or 3 stocks, you'll never be able to hold a stock until it hits 100 to 1. The reason I wrote 2 or 3 stocks rather than 1 is that by the time one of your stocks achieves 100 to 1, you will probably also have one or two that are at least 50 to one and another that is at least 30 to one. Most positions will have just average results and at least one will be a huge loss. 4) I've never had a 100 to 1 stock because I've always sold too soon. However, looking back on my investment career, had I never sold any of the stocks I bought, by now one would be over 100 to 1, one would be over 70 to 1, one over 60 to 1, one over 30 to 1, one over 20 to 1 and two over 10 to 1. I think there was only 1 would have gone to zero. I focused on companies that I though had the potential to grow tremendously. I did not focus, at all, on "a margin of safety." Consider this, if you had paid twice as much for a stock that achieved 100 to 1, you'd still have a 50 to 1 return! Great stocks rarely look fairly priced. At the time I bought them, I had never even heard of the 100 to 1 goal so it didn't even enter my mind. The three concepts that will prevent you from ever having a 100 to 1 stock, each so popular that it is by now accepted "wisdom" are A) You never go broke taking a profit, B) Bulls make money, bears make money, pigs get slaughtered, and 3) you must have a diversified portfolio. Ignore them.
I wish l could find you sir lol.
I think the formula in intelligent investor is really important in calculating intrinsic value of stocks, free cash flow is also important
We don’t pronounce the “T” in Home Depot.
You LISTENED to the video carefully, you deserve a BUFFET , or GOURMET food.
Yes, it comes from France, where they don't pronounce the final t.
Remember the one golden principle of statistic is "regression to the mean". I do not see that the earning alone can justify the speculative market value of the company beginning with a capital letter of N.
Yes! Get rid of the bots. I was getting worried when I hadn’t seen a video in weeks :). Fantastic channel
3rd. Read the book already. Great book. I think Charlie read it too.
Wish you all the best in your investments 🙌🏻
Many thanks for the support handroid cool!
It is an interesting book and timepiece - I do feel that it is slightly outdated and simplified. Still worth a read to see how value investing and investing in general has been evolving.
100 to 1 in knowledge for time spent. I still can't believe I found such a wonderful channel.
This is one of my top 2. Financial / stock market channel on RUclips
I mostly hold good dividend payers in my pension plan (including home depot) and don't worry about daily price changes.
$WKHS is my 100 to 1 pick.
Hii i am from India
Loved you video
First time watching it and already subscribe to your channel
happy I found u 2 years ago
when I will be financal free I will come visit in sweden
There is. Number 1 is stop listening to RUclips tips to guide your finances.
If you are not getting any regular check from the company, then you are not part owner. You are simply a sponsor.
you are my intelligent investor bruh!
Monish Pabrai recommended this book. I ended up buying a different one at the time called “100-bagger” or something and didn’t realize it was the wrong one until recently.
Great video as always! Would love to see your personal 5 Takeaways of what you learned from all your previous videos.
Thanks
Thank you for sharing with us, your video was also very helpful in allowing me to visualise the topic.
I watched around 6 videos of yours before i start my investing journey..
Its been a month now and im on 14% return
Would you make video on TelaDoc company TDOC about their moat in sector , based on earnings, revenue and PE
Great video! Very clear, very entertaining and very useful. Many thanks.
Argentina 🇦🇷 ❤wins against India 🇮🇳 in every soccer 🥅 ⚽️ match.
Erik my G, you really need to have a mod or somethimg to block these fking bots in your comment section
Well, here is an idea to chew on:
In 1626, Minuit bought Manhattan Island for $24.00 worth of trinkets. If only the natives invested that amount of money at 8% annual return. The return today would be over $446 trillion!!! In 2021, Manhattan Island was estimated to be $1.4 trillion.
I am just saying 😁
all your videos are absolutely amazing ! very clear, simple, fun , always on the key points ! thanks!
I have really miss your video
I made many 10-times and 35-times baggers during the pandemic... too bad i was diversified and my returns didnt allow me to retire :P
Great video as always.
Since we found this channel, we watch all the videos, and to be honest we have already read most of the books that that you recommended in some of your videos, even the very old ones. Thanks and keep it up
nice video, keep going the good work
very good explanation. Thank you very much
Thank you
9:45 rip on the Nvidia statements
Just opened eyes. A cup of coffee and a new video from you @Swedish Investor. Perfect Monday morning🎉
Yeah second that & I'll take another💯☕️
Haha, cheers Dimitar Ivanov! Glad to hear it :)
The hole in the ground owned by a liar is mentioned by Munger, but originally from Mark Twain 🙂Super channel by the way!
Good morning
If a company stops their R&D they probably will lack their competitors in the future.
I believe it was Mark Twain who said that, not Munger.
Great summary very interesting info about comparing PE ratio evaluation
Please enable speeding up the video
Hello sir,
I absolutely liked the video, and the way your teaching us if i can say that. I have a question witch is where can i start ? Can you please give me this advice ? By where i mean how ? After i watched your video it get me thinking of trying stocks. But i don't know where to start ! I am a student and i have some saved money, and i was think of, starting using it in such a way to balance the value lost with inflation. What do you think ?
Thank you for all the personnes who will read this and maybe gived and advice !
And one more think, like and subscribe the the channel !
That quote you ascribe to Charlie Munger is actually from Mark Twain.
Thank you for this video. Any insights about Roblox?
Hey, great video! :)
I don't agree with you on the R&D point. Most companies, like Nvidia, are running thanks to their R&D. If Nvidia were to cut their R&D by 100%, you'd get your 11.7, no doubt. But that would be extremely short term and the price would probably reflect that immediately. What do you think?
I was going to comment the same thing on R&D. It really depends on the company. NVDA needs to constantly innovate in order to stay compatible, they can cut their R&D budget to increase earnings in the short term, but that will put them on the back foot in the long term, compared to competitors like AMD and INTL. This seems to be valid across all of the tech sector, where innovation is the way to keep your market share.
Take a company like Disney though, their value comes mostly from IP, parks and streaming - I would not expect they would need much R&D to keep those businesses running or ahead of competitors.
In short - for NVDA the high R&D budget IS their moat so to speak, without it the company would go down. This is not the case for every company so one would much rather a company that does not depend on their R&D to stay ahead.
I agree Orel Zilberman, maybe I expressed myself a little too strongly there. I don't believe that they can remove their R&D costs without implications on the business. I think the point is still valid though, someone who is spending money on R&D and everything else equal, it should be the better buy.
Appreciate
Good info. Thx.
BTW: in terms of picking good stocks not very many of us have the sharp analytical brain as the likes of Warren Buffet.
Can you a bring a Hindi version of your channel?
Great video as usual, love the humour you put in your videos it helps make the content easier to understand!
🔥🔥🔥
$TSLA ?? Anyone here ?? Am betting min 20X by 2030
Published BOOK with
TSLA 2019
BOOK PRINTED WITH
That flag brought me here 🇮🇳
Hey buddy..your videos are awesome..can I translate and publish in my mother tongue(Tamil) ..In a way it will reach wider audience and we can also partner up
It'd be great if you could analyze and recommend some Swedish stocks and/or european stocks.
European stocks are very undervalued.
There will be something like this coming soon, E. T., stay tuned!
Very Clever use of flags of countries!
Just tell me which stock to buy to make 100 times my money??!!!
Just kidding, nice video!
Omg I am the first viewer 😀
Great video man 🤩
🎉
ESG... lulz. Nothing but a grift.
NVIDIA shaved years off my retirement year to date, though I would’ve been a millionaire few times over if my hedge landed instead 😂 😂, I do look for 100-1 but I use very little capital, maybe 5% 10%, but I’m old to, if I was younger or old and have no portfolio, first starting out I would probably allocate 40%-50%, I mean if you do your fundo and technos, it’s not gambling 😂 😂 or you can pull a Cathy wood and pull your funds right before it blows, and yes I agree with her that NVIDIA is too heavy and will fall but that’s what the hedge is for. She lost billions pulling that capital 😂
Thanks