How many Megapixels do you REALLY need?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- In this episode I show how we often waste money on megapixels, showing simple calculations of human vision to our cameras. Having a high megapixel camera can in fact cause lower quality at times, which I also show in this video along with real world examples and recommendations. Below are pertinent links mentioned in the video:
My online courses to learn Real Estate Photography:
LearnRE.Nathan...
Learn Pro Interior Photography:
ProInteriors.N...
Expert Editing for Interior Photography:
ExpertEditing....
Learn Pro Exterior Photography:
ProExteriors.N...
Learn Videography for Real Estate:
ProVideo.Natha...
My books on real estate photography:
amzn.to/3T84iax
Mastering Color in Photography:
amzn.to/3wTu75M
Baby Elephants, the children's book:
amzn.to/4aXWIFZ
My Baby Elephants Collection:
BabyElephants....
For those commenting about file size: It's a given (and common knowledge) that high megapixel cameras produce larger RAW files than low megapixel cameras. While that basic issue is important, what is more critical is the work you produce, its quality, and as shown in the video, the visual acuity. Storage is cheap and CPUs keep getting faster, so high megapixel counts shouldn't be your primary deterring factor. Instead, knowing if you have the right megapixels for the work you're doing should drive your gear-buying decisions.
For me, the higher megapixel count adds a bit more versatility. There are times when I don’t have the time to see other compositions possible for the moment captured, so being able to reframe and/or crop to varying degrees after the fact can help.
My background is more video, so to begin photography, I've been using my A7SIII at 12 MP. I thought it would be way too low of real estate photography, but while not perfect, people have been happy with the photos and really can't tell. This is mostly because they're not printing these and simply listing on their website and viewing on a cell phone. I realize I should have a bit more, but it's been good enough for a start.
As always - explained to the smallest detail! GREAT JOB!
Very well explained. Thanks
Pixel peeping is a disease, nobody would ever use magnifying glass to analyze a picture in a gallery.
I have a Nikon D850 and shoot on the small RAW size, which is about 11 megapixels.
Nathan, you're truly cool! Thanks.
HA HA! Thanks :)
Where can i find and download the spreadsheet you used showing Megapixels Per Distance?
If your books are as useful and informative as your RUclips videos I am going to thank you in advance.
Thanks...I think :) But seriously, my books, and more so my courses, have much more information than these brief RUclips videos.
Much thanks. Honest and to the point. Salute.
Thank you!
Very interesting and informative!
Finally megapixels well explained, thanks Nathan!
When you send final photos to your clients, what size are they? How many mb and what dimensions?
Each MLS has different size requirements so check with yours on that.
Well said Nathan .
Thank you!
For the past 5 years I’ve been shooting with a 42MP camera. Also I’ve been accustomed to FiberOptic internet.
Last week I moved to a new house that doesn’t have fiber as an option. I’m seriously considering a new camera to reduce the upload times (I’m getting 1/10th of what I had before) 😢
With my 20+ years as a photographer and my first digital camera being 6 mp and my first pro camera being 4mp. With modern cameras today and mainly real estate where 90% of everything is on a screen 16-20 no is just fine. And I shoot m4/3 as well. In my opinion full frame sensors are over kill for this industry. There are some great benefits. But still over kill.
two big ones
Your scientific approach on various topics is one of the reasons I am hooked on your Chanel , so thank you for the time spent on preparing this episode.
Yet more proof why I consider you an expert Nathan. Very interesting film and Ive rarely seen the topic explained so well! Thank you Nathan.
Thank you so much!