Wrong. Extraordinarily smart girls are more attractive, sexually and otherwise, than vacuous or irrational girls. Explore this in your own experience (although statistically successful marriages sole correlation, .4 or .44, has been found to be similar intelligence as defined through common standard testing: Stanford-Binet or Wechsler as i remember from running into the research at school.
Is it you or is the information straight forward? I can't tell if you are excellent at explaining it or if the information is meant to be understood. 🤭 😁👍
Early in math, i had extreme difficulties in translating the equations into or from word problems. Set theory easily overcomes this gap. However, late in this video some odd fiction was introduced, which was completely irrational. There's no correlation (intersection whatsoever i can make, of a fictional dramatic character with any possible mathematical concept. Nonexistent organisms can't really be included in and universe of, or universal, sets. Why? Such concepts are both zero and infinite, should attempt be made to include = NOT well-defined.
Study Hall Peter Parker is back!!!
Name the book/movie: “The Venn diagram of boys who don't like smart girls and boys you don't wanna date is a circle.”
Jurassic Park.
I don't know! I don't watch most anything but crash course and study hall lately 😅😁
Wrong.
Extraordinarily smart girls are more attractive, sexually and otherwise, than vacuous or irrational girls.
Explore this in your own experience (although statistically successful marriages sole correlation, .4 or .44, has been found to be similar intelligence as defined through common standard testing: Stanford-Binet or Wechsler as i remember from running into the research at school.
Math I wish I learned in school
Is it you or is the information straight forward? I can't tell if you are excellent at explaining it or if the information is meant to be understood. 🤭 😁👍
finish your mathspace tasks
Early in math, i had extreme difficulties in translating the equations into or from word problems. Set theory easily overcomes this gap. However, late in this video some odd fiction was introduced, which was completely irrational.
There's no correlation (intersection whatsoever i can make, of a fictional dramatic character with any possible mathematical concept.
Nonexistent organisms can't really be included in and universe of, or universal, sets.
Why? Such concepts are both zero and infinite, should attempt be made to include = NOT well-defined.
Excuse me, irritating autocorrect seems to have occurred - not "and," but " any" was intended in 3rd paragraph.