I have been using the mastering assistant A LOT. But I turn it on and off while I’m mixing to get an idea of how the mix is sounding with a semi-accurate master. Then i turn it off and continue the mix. It just kind of gives me an idea of how the song will sound mastered which helps me hear if anything is jumping out.
This is by far the most useful and clear video about mastering that I've watched. The process always seemed vague and nebulous, which intimidated me. When I saw the Mastering Assistant, I was so happy to just set and forget it, or nudge here and there and find my way to learning mastering. Understanding the concepts as tone, dynamic, and stereo shaping, that I learned from this video, has been immense. Thank you so much!
I’ve been using it a lot too. Really great resource. One thing worth mentioning is that it will master the whole track, OR a highlighted section. I am finding that if I highlight the chorus or otherwise the most dense or loud section that what it suggests gives me a lot more ideas than having it just analyze the whole track.
I've been using mastering assistant for the last week or two, and watched your video to get some tips. Something I've discovered, you may want to consider - I add mastering assistant in at the end of the chain in my previous mastering attempt. Each time I've done it it has brought something to my attention that I was missing. And, in a couple cases, I just left it in because it made my mix better.
by far the most useful video I found on this subject -- and the best takeaway -- learn from observing what the Mastering Assistant does, a tip I immediately put to work. thanks!
i just started using it. But as far as I understand, you don't have to have a mixed down version of the song, you can just paste it on the stereo out of the multitrack session. then you can go back and change things easily.
This video was very helpful thank you for this! I was hesitant on using this tool but now that I saw how you did yours I feel more comfortable incorporating it into my music
I like the vocals on your master better, and the instruments on the Logic master. However, I have found that the Transparent chain handles my vocals better. This tutorial is great! I learned so much. I may never use eMastered again lol. I have been haviing trouble with loudness but after watching this I think I can fix it.
It would be great to see you run Mastering Assistant against your "already mastered" mix ... instead of turning off all your mastering plugins. IMO those plugins add a lot of character that should be considered part of your pre-master mix.
I agree. I’ve been using the mastering assistant since it came out and have experimented a lot. I’ve come to conclusion that the mastering assistant works best when used in tandem with your usual mastering setup. Once I’ve mastered everything how i normally do, I’ll then throw the mastering assistant on so it could “analyze” and take into consideration the plugins on the track. It. Been working wonders in my mastered tracks and brings them to life like never before. It’s truly a game changer!
I've experimented with automation with this-especially with the spread. Creates some great effects on a more dynamic mix. Close and centered for more intimate moments and big and wide for things like string sections or ending choruses. Great tutorial
Great demo. Best I've seen on this plugin yet. Downloaded the guide, Liked, Sub'd and even bought the song on iTunes (yes, some people still do that). Thank you.
I don't know, it looks like a very detailed EQ curve that isn't dynamic. I mean, if it sounds good, sure. But I'd be less inclined to put that over an entire mix. I would at least want multiple curves depending on the section of the song. Or I would want a smoothing feature so the EQ is not so granular. I feel like these AI assistants are best used as guides for your own mastering session. It's nice to know, though, that it gives a pleasing result.
in watching this video for the second and third time, I'm learning more about what makes you great at doing this, how your unselfishness in making great records works its magic..no ego..it's what comes out of the speakers. Love that concept, it says volumes about getting it right and challenging yourself to do better..Thanks Colin
Is it meant to be the only plugin on the master bus? I would think you'd want some light compression at the least maybe even saturation as well before feeding it to the MA plugin
I've been using eMastered, which is quite good, but what I've been missing is the fine-tuning that's available when you master by hand. This seems like the best of the both worlds!
Thanks again, Colin, for covering the LPs new Mastering Assistant. Since I have Apple Silicon, I get all the options of EQ characters. I like the Transparent one and the punchy one.
Thanks! Great video. There isn't a lot of vids about this topic, since it's so new... I have tested this feature with all four Characters with various settings(custom eq, loudness, etc), Analyze Section vs Analyze All, etc. There is def a good difference between them and I do find (on my mix) that loudness and excite can add that extra goodness to the mix. I have bounced versions for each one and def. feel the difference. One of my biggest issues is forgetting to turn it off when I go back to my mix and tweek it. With it still turn on, I am tweaking the Assistant's Mix and not my mix.. And truthfully, I am haven't decided if that is a good or bad thing.. Anyway.. good stuff. Thanks.
Always enjoy your easy to follow videos. I'd like to see a more in depth video of your normal mastering process that you brushed over. My Mac is too old to get the new version of Logic & I've tried various mastering options to varying degrees of success. I've used Emastered but it adds far too much "varnish" on mixes for my liking, even when using the reduced options. Way too expensive to continue my subscription(converted to NZD doesn't help)! I'm sure Landr & Emastered will be losing business with this great Logic advancement lol! Cheers
I've found use for it by using it after I've done a polished mix/master chain. It usually pushes it that little extra step by bringing out more nuance in the final mix.
Thanks for sharing!! I actually came here to learn about what the Character options are doing in the Logic mastering section. I'v noticed "Transparent" or "Clean" has been my go to. It really seems to just be the type of master bus compression on the mix. Transparent is little to no compression, "Valve" puts vocal deep in the mix and punch of course you hear the compressor breathing, Perfect for those heavy dance, house or trap tracks while there is a lot of ducking around the low in. I just wish I could see what it's doing on the back end.
Same here!!! Clean is similar to transparent but always a little too bright for my acoustic stuff without drums When I use drums valve sounds nice as it makes it so smooth and gives it a vintage vibe I think 🤷
Re: A/B-ing, you could use different outs of your I/O to bypass Logic mastering plug. It would be nice if Logic had an A/B group setup. Select the plugs or tracks you want in A and then B, and you had a toggle so you could enable disable a bunch of stuff at once. When you stopped the track, disabled your master track plugs then enabled master plug and ran the transport again, you lose the vibe. Insta A/B is pretty key. A/B Macros Logic…please
Best tip I've seen from another RUclipsr is mixing in mono via (Gain stock plug-in in Logic Pro X). Works with monitors and headphones and it produces excellent results across devices. When you're done you turn off the mono setting and you've hopefully got a lush mix! Couldn't hear a big difference from manual and auto mastering in this clip. Guess that's a good review! Appreciate the video :)
I'm liking the Valve Character on a song I'm working on, it has a nice subtle analog boost of the low and high ends. I think the Punch setting would work nice on your "No Time for Love" song. Also I've noticed that even with the Auto EQ at 0% it improves a song, and at 0% you can hear the differences between the different Character modes. The Clean setting says it includes a little Punch and Transparent to it. Clean seems like a good middle of the road setting, although bass sounds fuller on the other modes and more tame on the Clean setting. Hope you can get silicone soon.
Yeah I think your original mix had more dynamic life to it. I do like that the mastering plug-in made you aware of the high midrange issue you hadn't heard before. I have a similar fight with my mixes in that frequency range too. Good video, 👍🏻
Loudness Compensation works fine on Apple silicon machines. Looks like they haven’t debugged it properly in the intel version. Tells you everything you need to know about their attitude to Intel Mac’s unfortunately.
I recently bought the new Mac PRO with the highest chip available and that gives me the ability to use "Transparent" on the Mastering Assistant and I LOVE it!!!
Thanks for the tips. I'm using the plugin, but I'm not clear on how to use the LUFS analyzer. You hit start, and then you can pause it, but it doesn't seem to change anything. Do you have any thoughts? Also, this plugin's output is very quiet unless you crank the Loudness by at least 4 - 5 points, and even so, the result shows a Maximum volume of 88.67 (or minus 1.04 dB). Apple should allow you to set the final output.
Even though we get control of the constituents I would like a a breakout button where you get to see the full chain of Mastering plug-in compressors and eq and have even further control.
Try exciting before you manually raise it at 3K? Both raising the eq suggestion and exciting it may have produced some of that shrillness. And what happens if you put the Mastering Assistant at the end of your mastering chain?
1. Why are you bypassing all the plug-ins? 2. By "Track" do you mean a Project Alternative? In other words, are you mastering a song rather than an individual track within a song?
I have an idea about the original being louder than the master when using bypass. I had the same thing happen after, for example, changing an eq setting in the chain before the mastering plugin. I fixed it by reanalyzing the track and it was normalized.
I wish you could automate certain parameters of this. That does get a little into the weeds, but there could be moments where you want different settings on different parts of a particular song. It would also be nice if we could save different presets that we come up with so that we could apply them to different parts of a particular song or try them on a new song and then manipulate them from there if necessary. I will still do all of my mastering the way I've done it conventionally all along, but this gives an opportunity to add just a tiny bit of sheen to that. I think of it as a final step. One thing I'd rather do prior to this is setting the width using the direction mixer plug-in, which very likely uses the same sort of algorithm as this mastering assistant plug-in. I set a crossover at about 170 Hz and mono everything below that. And then you can play with the width from 1.0 to about 1.3 and get the width you're looking for in the frequencies you're looking for. If I need to manipulate the width a little bit more, I can do that using the mastering assistant plug-in. I'm not convinced MA is all that accurate. It analyzes a snapshot. Tracks have dynamics in the compression envelopes and it likely is not taking those into account. It would probably take a lot more processing power and a real-time analysis on playback to get a really accurate read. That's an option they should consider adding in v11.2.
So far I liked the clean and transparent modes the best. I agree that you have to be careful with the loudness control or you get pumping effects. I have so far been unlucky with the excite button, it ofthen makes the highs harsh sounding.
I've never tried other than the "clean" setting because I'm on intels so far but I've the same experience with the loudness and the excite setting. Yes, pumping on loudness+ and arshness with the exciter. I'm also quite confused by the loudness compensator. Sometimes it works sometime it's totaly out of what I could expect.
Is there any way we can make LUFS around -6.5 ~ -7.0 using Mastering Assistant only? Loudness level +1.0 in dynamics knob usually gave me too much noise compared to your another method in a different video clip :(
Is it possible that the Loudness Compensation only works if you've run the entire song through so that the Mastering Assistant can get an Integrated reading of the LUFS ?
I just got around to trying it with an M1 chip. The clean to me sounds way worse than the other options and it sounds far more distorted using the exciter. Just my opinion. It defaults to transparent on mine. I think clean is just for non-M1 chips.
Why does it always boost around 50 so extreme. I've been fooling with this and over and over even if I boost those frequencies with the bass, kick or something it still always boosts in that area.
your mix is way better.. i was very excited about this assistant but I'm not massively impressed so far.. when you get silicon I find the transparent setting the best for my music.. the clear often completely distorts things.. but the most annoying thing is just turning the assistant on add a latency into the entire track which i can't get rid of so it's impossible to add any extra layers in once you have touched that button.. i'm trying to find a way to remove the assistant completely..
In our songs, as soon as we try to add even the slightest bit of extra Loudness, we start to hear crackling (high-frequency distortion). Any ideas as to why that is happening ? Thanks in advance.
Probably a dumb question, but do you think the Mastering Assistant would be useful at the end of a mix, then bounce, THEN use your regular mastering chain in a different file, effectively mastering the track "twice"? Or would that be too much processing? I wonder because the MA might be good to smooth out some issues in the mix but not quite have the character or clarity that one might find in fancier mastering chains.
Great sounding track although I wasn't really hearing much bottom end on your masters ? great song all the same. if you compare the low end on that track to the low end on the track you play on your outro you'll know what i mean. Were all your mastering decisions made using your monitors, headphones or both ? How do you know if your tweaks are correct unless you have flattened headphones or something like sound Id from sonar works ? Personally i feel most mixing and mastering is largely just guess work without having a monitoring system that doesn't lie to you. I use sonar works in a very well treated room with very expensive speakers and still cant trust what i hear. i have just purchased Slate VSX headphones and i hope to get closer to being able to pull a great mix without the dreaded trips to the car. I also use ozone 11 with random results. like you, I wish i could access the other characters in logic but i'm stuck with CLEAN cause i'm also on intel. shame they couldn't accomodate us with the other character presets. Appreciate your video.
You say that you need a good mix to wind up with a good master, but then you turned off all your mix effects. Shouldn't you leave them on and then master?
Hey Alan- this is a dedicating mastering session. I've already fully mixed the song in a separate session then exported it out and imported it into this session to master it. I'm comparing the Mastering Assistant to my own mastering processing. I explain this whole setup in this video: ruclips.net/video/4wtj11BalTU/видео.html
Your version was a bit darker, in a good way, the mastering assistant version was a bit too bright, the kick had this weird clicking brightness. But I guess you can compensate that with the eq. Good video!
Just make sure that you are done and happy with all the tracking before you use this feature. It causes latency that doesn't go away, even if you remove it.
‼ Download the free 6-Step PRO MIX Checklist here: www.thebandguide.com/logicpromix ‼
I have been using the mastering assistant A LOT. But I turn it on and off while I’m mixing to get an idea of how the mix is sounding with a semi-accurate master. Then i turn it off and continue the mix. It just kind of gives me an idea of how the song will sound mastered which helps me hear if anything is jumping out.
This is by far the most useful and clear video about mastering that I've watched. The process always seemed vague and nebulous, which intimidated me. When I saw the Mastering Assistant, I was so happy to just set and forget it, or nudge here and there and find my way to learning mastering. Understanding the concepts as tone, dynamic, and stereo shaping, that I learned from this video, has been immense. Thank you so much!
I’ve been using it a lot too. Really great resource. One thing worth mentioning is that it will master the whole track, OR a highlighted section. I am finding that if I highlight the chorus or otherwise the most dense or loud section that what it suggests gives me a lot more ideas than having it just analyze the whole track.
Please please never stop these videos !!
Always so informative !
You got it, rob!
I've been using mastering assistant for the last week or two, and watched your video to get some tips. Something I've discovered, you may want to consider - I add mastering assistant in at the end of the chain in my previous mastering attempt. Each time I've done it it has brought something to my attention that I was missing. And, in a couple cases, I just left it in because it made my mix better.
Great stuff, nice and thorough walk through, cheers dude. subbed.
by far the most useful video I found on this subject -- and the best takeaway -- learn from observing what the Mastering Assistant does, a tip I immediately put to work. thanks!
i just started using it. But as far as I understand, you don't have to have a mixed down version of the song, you can just paste it on the stereo out of the multitrack session. then you can go back and change things easily.
I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on how the Mastering Assistant compares with Ozone 11.
This video was very helpful thank you for this! I was hesitant on using this tool but now that I saw how you did yours I feel more comfortable incorporating it into my music
I like the vocals on your master better, and the instruments on the Logic master. However, I have found that the Transparent chain handles my vocals better. This tutorial is great! I learned so much. I may never use eMastered again lol. I have been haviing trouble with loudness but after watching this I think I can fix it.
It would be great to see you run Mastering Assistant against your "already mastered" mix ... instead of turning off all your mastering plugins. IMO those plugins add a lot of character that should be considered part of your pre-master mix.
I agree. I’ve been using the mastering assistant since it came out and have experimented a lot. I’ve come to conclusion that the mastering assistant works best when used in tandem with your usual mastering setup. Once I’ve mastered everything how i normally do, I’ll then throw the mastering assistant on so it could “analyze” and take into consideration the plugins on the track. It. Been working wonders in my mastered tracks and brings them to life like never before. It’s truly a game changer!
Great session Colin. Watched it twice already, will watch again, thank you, lots of LUFS.
Somehow that button doesn’t show up. Is it because I have a master fade track at the bottom?
I've experimented with automation with this-especially with the spread. Creates some great effects on a more dynamic mix. Close and centered for more intimate moments and big and wide for things like string sections or ending choruses. Great tutorial
Also, Valve and Punch are the two go-to's to start. The default clean just sounds more brittle to me. Great tool to have in the... er, mix :)
Great demo. Best I've seen on this plugin yet. Downloaded the guide, Liked, Sub'd and even bought the song on iTunes (yes, some people still do that). Thank you.
I don't know, it looks like a very detailed EQ curve that isn't dynamic. I mean, if it sounds good, sure. But I'd be less inclined to put that over an entire mix. I would at least want multiple curves depending on the section of the song. Or I would want a smoothing feature so the EQ is not so granular. I feel like these AI assistants are best used as guides for your own mastering session.
It's nice to know, though, that it gives a pleasing result.
Great video, I really love your honesty in the review. I am a novice and have lots to learn. This is a great start.
in watching this video for the second and third time, I'm learning more about what makes you great at doing this, how your unselfishness in making great records works its magic..no ego..it's what comes out of the speakers. Love that concept, it says volumes about getting it right and challenging yourself to do better..Thanks Colin
Is it meant to be the only plugin on the master bus? I would think you'd want some light compression at the least maybe even saturation as well before feeding it to the MA plugin
Thank you! Very easy to follow your tuts and SUPER helpful!
I've been using eMastered, which is quite good, but what I've been missing is the fine-tuning that's available when you master by hand. This seems like the best of the both worlds!
Nice! The ability to tweak it like this is definitely necessary to me
Very good explanation. Thank you Colin!
Thanks again, Colin, for covering the LPs new Mastering Assistant. Since I have Apple Silicon, I get all the options of EQ characters. I like the Transparent one and the punchy one.
Thanks! Great video. There isn't a lot of vids about this topic, since it's so new... I have tested this feature with all four Characters with various settings(custom eq, loudness, etc), Analyze Section vs Analyze All, etc. There is def a good difference between them and I do find (on my mix) that loudness and excite can add that extra goodness to the mix. I have bounced versions for each one and def. feel the difference. One of my biggest issues is forgetting to turn it off when I go back to my mix and tweek it. With it still turn on, I am tweaking the Assistant's Mix and not my mix.. And truthfully, I am haven't decided if that is a good or bad thing.. Anyway.. good stuff. Thanks.
Always enjoy your easy to follow videos. I'd like to see a more in depth video of your normal mastering process that you brushed over. My Mac is too old to get the new version of Logic & I've tried various mastering options to varying degrees of success. I've used Emastered but it adds far too much "varnish" on mixes for my liking, even when using the reduced options. Way too expensive to continue my subscription(converted to NZD doesn't help)! I'm sure Landr & Emastered will be losing business with this great Logic advancement lol! Cheers
I've found use for it by using it after I've done a polished mix/master chain. It usually pushes it that little extra step by bringing out more nuance in the final mix.
So you bounce twice ??
@@djbritishknight5167 No, I just get the mix to where I want it, and then slap it on the end of the stereo out chain. After that, it's bounced.
@@AnthonyPompa What about your master chain ? Add it there
@@djbritishknight5167 Yes.
@@AnthonyPompa You got it.
Thanks for sharing!! I actually came here to learn about what the Character options are doing in the Logic mastering section. I'v noticed "Transparent" or "Clean" has been my go to. It really seems to just be the type of master bus compression on the mix. Transparent is little to no compression, "Valve" puts vocal deep in the mix and punch of course you hear the compressor breathing, Perfect for those heavy dance, house or trap tracks while there is a lot of ducking around the low in. I just wish I could see what it's doing on the back end.
On my M1 iMac so far I like Valve and Transparent most. Which of the two depends on what I'm mastering.
Same here!!!
Clean is similar to transparent but always a little too bright for my acoustic stuff without drums
When I use drums valve sounds nice as it makes it so smooth and gives it a vintage vibe I think 🤷
here you go again..making it make sense...you're a great teacher
Re: A/B-ing, you could use different outs of your I/O to bypass Logic mastering plug.
It would be nice if Logic had an A/B group setup. Select the plugs or tracks you want in A and then B, and you had a toggle so you could enable disable a bunch of stuff at once. When you stopped the track, disabled your master track plugs then enabled master plug and ran the transport again, you lose the vibe. Insta A/B is pretty key.
A/B Macros Logic…please
Best tip I've seen from another RUclipsr is mixing in mono via (Gain stock plug-in in Logic Pro X). Works with monitors and headphones and it produces excellent results across devices. When you're done you turn off the mono setting and you've hopefully got a lush mix!
Couldn't hear a big difference from manual and auto mastering in this clip. Guess that's a good review!
Appreciate the video :)
I have tried the different Character settings and, for me, the Transparent filter seems to sound best.
Awesome! That seems like a crowd favorite
Punch can be good for more dance type tunes or maybe hiphop. Otherwise transparent is usually the way to go.
Great video, thanks! What kind of headroom should I be leaving before I apply the mastering assistant?
I really like the valve setting….all four are useable! Love the mastering assistant.
This is really helpful man. I appreciate it
Thank you 🙏 every video make is really great and helpful! You are good at explaining and choosing nice stuff to make tutorials about! Keep it up!
Great video--i just subbed..very informative.. We're lucky we have this mastering assistant in Logic pro
How do you make a mastered track taking all your tracks and putting it into one track?
From A to Z, perfectly explained!
Your video was so helpful. Can'r wait until I get to the mastering stage in the project I am working on to try it out.
Using the Punch setting in the Character section mostly and really gives my project hmmmph 😮 thanks for this by the way
I'm liking the Valve Character on a song I'm working on, it has a nice subtle analog boost of the low and high ends. I think the Punch setting would work nice on your "No Time for Love" song. Also I've noticed that even with the Auto EQ at 0% it improves a song, and at 0% you can hear the differences between the different Character modes. The Clean setting says it includes a little Punch and Transparent to it. Clean seems like a good middle of the road setting, although bass sounds fuller on the other modes and more tame on the Clean setting. Hope you can get silicone soon.
Yeah I think your original mix had more dynamic life to it. I do like that the mastering plug-in made you aware of the high midrange issue you hadn't heard before. I have a similar fight with my mixes in that frequency range too. Good video, 👍🏻
Loudness Compensation works fine on Apple silicon machines. Looks like they haven’t debugged it properly in the intel version. Tells you everything you need to know about their attitude to Intel Mac’s unfortunately.
Much appreciated for the videos!
Thank you for the info a well done presentation
I recently bought the new Mac PRO with the highest chip available and that gives me the ability to use "Transparent" on the Mastering Assistant and I LOVE it!!!
Thanks for the tips.
I'm using the plugin, but I'm not clear on how to use the LUFS analyzer. You hit start, and then you can pause it, but it doesn't seem to change anything. Do you have any thoughts?
Also, this plugin's output is very quiet unless you crank the Loudness by at least 4 - 5 points, and even so, the result shows a Maximum volume of 88.67 (or minus 1.04 dB).
Apple should allow you to set the final output.
Even though we get control of the constituents I would like a a breakout button where you get to see the full chain of Mastering plug-in compressors and eq and have even further control.
Does the steep spread the low end too?
Try exciting before you manually raise it at 3K? Both raising the eq suggestion and exciting it may have produced some of that shrillness. And what happens if you put the Mastering Assistant at the end of your mastering chain?
1. Why are you bypassing all the plug-ins? 2. By "Track" do you mean a Project Alternative? In other words, are you mastering a song rather than an individual track within a song?
Hey great teacher you are spot on , using it as a tool. On a Mac Studio max the other options giv you different flavours of learning :)
I didn’t think there was a lot between your master and the Logic version!
Great video! How can I get the 4 options of characters? I only get CLEAN.
you need apple silicon
Another great video, cheers
I have an idea about the original being louder than the master when using bypass. I had the same thing happen after, for example, changing an eq setting in the chain before the mastering plugin. I fixed it by reanalyzing the track and it was normalized.
I wish you could automate certain parameters of this. That does get a little into the weeds, but there could be moments where you want different settings on different parts of a particular song. It would also be nice if we could save different presets that we come up with so that we could apply them to different parts of a particular song or try them on a new song and then manipulate them from there if necessary.
I will still do all of my mastering the way I've done it conventionally all along, but this gives an opportunity to add just a tiny bit of sheen to that. I think of it as a final step.
One thing I'd rather do prior to this is setting the width using the direction mixer plug-in, which very likely uses the same sort of algorithm as this mastering assistant plug-in. I set a crossover at about 170 Hz and mono everything below that. And then you can play with the width from 1.0 to about 1.3 and get the width you're looking for in the frequencies you're looking for. If I need to manipulate the width a little bit more, I can do that using the mastering assistant plug-in.
I'm not convinced MA is all that accurate. It analyzes a snapshot. Tracks have dynamics in the compression envelopes and it likely is not taking those into account. It would probably take a lot more processing power and a real-time analysis on playback to get a really accurate read. That's an option they should consider adding in v11.2.
So far I liked the clean and transparent modes the best. I agree that you have to be careful with the loudness control or you get pumping effects. I have so far been unlucky with the excite button, it ofthen makes the highs harsh sounding.
I've never tried other than the "clean" setting because I'm on intels so far but I've the same experience with the loudness and the excite setting. Yes, pumping on loudness+ and arshness with the exciter. I'm also quite confused by the loudness compensator. Sometimes it works sometime it's totaly out of what I could expect.
Great learning. Thanks.
Is it crazy to wish they also has a mix assistant...or does that already exist in logic?
Is there any way we can make LUFS around -6.5 ~ -7.0 using Mastering Assistant only? Loudness level +1.0 in dynamics knob usually gave me too much noise compared to your another method in a different video clip :(
Quick question: why are you using the stock EQ and a Tube EQ and the air plugin? Would the stock linear EQ be able to do all of that stuff?
Question: Would you export your track as a WAV with the master assistant.
The transparent selection seems to work best for me. valve would be more for rap, punch works good for rock and pop.
Transparent and Clean. Rarely use Punch unless the song isn't real hard or percussive, maybe folksy. Never have tried valve, we'll see about that.
Turn exciter in mastering plugin off and put Logic standalone exciter in for larger exciter control. 🌞
Can we talk about how dope this song is though? 😍
Is it possible that the Loudness Compensation only works if you've run the entire song through so that the Mastering Assistant can get an Integrated reading of the LUFS ?
I just got around to trying it with an M1 chip. The clean to me sounds way worse than the other options and it sounds far more distorted using the exciter. Just my opinion. It defaults to transparent on mine. I think clean is just for non-M1 chips.
dumb question, but what exactly does "bypass" do?
Nice one
When you bounce the song out initially, are you pulling it back in as an audio track to master? Or are you mastering from the original set of tracks?
Why does it always boost around 50 so extreme. I've been fooling with this and over and over even if I boost those frequencies with the bass, kick or something it still always boosts in that area.
Hi band do i use this after my personal mix of my track ?
Totally agree with you and thanks ;-)
your mix is way better.. i was very excited about this assistant but I'm not massively impressed so far.. when you get silicon I find the transparent setting the best for my music.. the clear often completely distorts things.. but the most annoying thing is just turning the assistant on add a latency into the entire track which i can't get rid of so it's impossible to add any extra layers in once you have touched that button.. i'm trying to find a way to remove the assistant completely..
In our songs, as soon as we try to add even the slightest bit of extra Loudness, we start to hear crackling (high-frequency distortion). Any ideas as to why that is happening ? Thanks in advance.
+1 for using actually using a pleasent music sample.
Probably a dumb question, but do you think the Mastering Assistant would be useful at the end of a mix, then bounce, THEN use your regular mastering chain in a different file, effectively mastering the track "twice"? Or would that be too much processing? I wonder because the MA might be good to smooth out some issues in the mix but not quite have the character or clarity that one might find in fancier mastering chains.
thanks man
I'm trying to master tunes but I'm also a cosmetologist and you have great hair! Thanks for all the tips :)
ayyyy that's high praise!!
Great sounding track although I wasn't really hearing much bottom end on your masters ? great song all the same. if you compare the low end on that track to the low end on the track you play on your outro you'll know what i mean. Were all your mastering decisions made using your monitors, headphones or both ? How do you know if your tweaks are correct unless you have flattened headphones or something like sound Id from sonar works ? Personally i feel most mixing and mastering is largely just guess work without having a monitoring system that doesn't lie to you.
I use sonar works in a very well treated room with very expensive speakers and still cant trust what i hear. i have just purchased Slate VSX headphones and i hope to get closer to being able to pull a great mix without the dreaded trips to the car. I also use ozone 11 with random results. like you, I wish i could access the other characters in logic but i'm stuck with CLEAN cause i'm also on intel. shame they couldn't accomodate us with the other character presets. Appreciate your video.
I love fhe transparent and valve characters 😊
You say that you need a good mix to wind up with a good master, but then you turned off all your mix effects. Shouldn't you leave them on and then master?
Hey Alan- this is a dedicating mastering session. I've already fully mixed the song in a separate session then exported it out and imported it into this session to master it. I'm comparing the Mastering Assistant to my own mastering processing. I explain this whole setup in this video: ruclips.net/video/4wtj11BalTU/видео.html
awesome!
My favorite is Transparent
Put the other tracks thru outputs 3-4
Addictive song 😊
side note: I love the melody of the song! lol
Your version was a bit darker, in a good way, the mastering assistant version was a bit too bright, the kick had this weird clicking brightness. But I guess you can compensate that with the eq. Good video!
I don’t like the excite button at all, it just adds too many artefacts to the sound. Other than that this mastering assistant is a great tool.
actually transparent mode makes things better compressed 🙌🏻
I think transparent sounds the best too.
No comparison that your master sounds so much better.
Yours sounds better. But yeah, its also louder.
Just make sure that you are done and happy with all the tracking before you use this feature. It causes latency that doesn't go away, even if you remove it.
thanx
Just leave it alone big dawg it sounds just fine how the mastering assistant did it