China’s Military Is Worried about Australia’s Rise! How Powerful Australian Military Today
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 сен 2024
- Embark on a journey with us as we dissect the power of Australia's military. Is #australia equipped for China? This video scrutinizes the prowess and capabilities of the Australian #defence Force, juxtaposing it with #china military power. We'll scrutinize everything from military ranks and gear to size and pay structures. This is an essential watch for anyone intrigued by military power dynamics and global relations. Don't miss this exhaustive analysis of Australia's military readiness for potential confrontations.
------
Welcome to Notify, the go-to destination for all things military! We provide an educational and entertaining experience tailored to tech-savvy individuals and military enthusiasts. Our goal is to inform, engage, and inspire you with captivating content about military equipment and the latest #news.
At #Notify, we stand out in the #military niche with our #informative and #educational approach. Delving deep into the world of military #technology, we explore cutting-edge #equipment, strategic advancements, and the latest innovations that shape the future of #warfare in #army #navy #airforce #marines. Our comprehensive content goes beyond the surface level, offering valuable insights and in-depth analysis.
Join us for equipment #reviews, #comparisons, discussions on military #history and #tactics, interviews with experts, firsthand accounts from veterans and thought-provoking debates on current military affairs. We strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, empowering you with a deeper understanding of the military world.
Notify is more than just a channel; it's a platform that sparks discussions, fuels curiosity, and fosters a community of lifelong learners. Embark on an immersive journey into the world of military technology with Notify - where knowledge meets entertainment!
Subscribe now and be part of something extraordinary.
---
For copyright matters please get in touch with us at: notifymilitary@gmail.com
Disclaimer - Some contents are used for educational purposes under fair use. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Australia is a peaceful country no where else in the world like Australia, Hopefully in future they don't have to used there weapon against invaders.. Peace to Australia forever
Bullshit ... you been in shady conflicts , what USA says you jump and say how high !!!
I don't think China is too worried about Australia's Military power.
Ain’t that the truth ❤️🇦🇺
Yeah we tiny and they're massive
@@JordanOpitztrue
More likely there own government 😢
Not currently. They are however worried about us getting nuclear submarines which would make us one of only three countries that could block their access to the Indian Ocean from the South China Sea.
I’m Australian I’m aboriginal Australia’s my home land my home land the bush I hope war won’t happen again :(
Im not aboriginal myself but also live in Aus.
War is the last thing anyone here should want, though unfortunately it’s definitely looking like a very real possibility in the near future if world politics and tensions keep going the way they are currently.
Would definitely suck bro especially with someone like china.
Canberra will NOT be replaced by The HUNTER class...they are 2 completly different ships
i laughed when i saw this
@@ITSaPendragon Lol why would you swap out a Landing Helicopter Dock ship for a air warfare destroyer? Its getting added to the Navy not replacing anything.
@@26Rudders no shit sherlock
I saw there was no mention of the construction of the AUKUS planned nuclear submarines either
@@26RuddersFrigate, not destroyer.
I think you've left out Australia's most powerful and deadly weapon of them all: the Australian people themselves
Nah bro the kangaroos bro💀
@@MoonlightgamersYTyeah lad, they won’t stand a chance against a girthy big red with a hard on for some Chinese roo cross breeding session.
China should ask why Australia is increasing its military capacity. No country wants to spend money on defence unless it has no other viable options. Perhaps Xi is using inappropriate language.
Why is china on the biggest military build of any country on the planet...there is your answer
China been doing it since early 2000. Why can't Australia.
Australia is taking necessary steps to ensure its National security remains strong ! China is expanding its Military presence in the Pacific Ocean and in the South China Sea, Australia even though has a relatively small population it has a very powerful military. Australia 🇦🇺 will not be bullied by China.
Australia is a vassal of the US government and has to procure military hardware from the use to “protect” itself. 😮 China is not threatening anyone. The threat is being perpetuated by the US and the MIC. It’s about the $$$. US is running the biggest protection racquet in the world…
China know exactly why
The Royal Australian Air Force has no helicopters, all defence helicopters now belong to the army or the navy
But yet they are all still in Australia right?. So it doesn't matter who has them.
The Ghost Bat is honestly a game changer . You have NO idea of what it will be spec'd up to do.
Respect to Australia from India 🇦🇺 ❤ 🇮🇳
Australians will remeber this
Right back, at you India!!
We were allies in WW2, it was the Australians and the Indian Armed forces who first stopped the German army in WW2 at Tobruk
The Hunter Clas frigates wil NOT replace the two Canberra Class Landing Helicopter Dock ships as stated in your video. They will replace the 8 Anzac Class frigates.
The guy didn't do a single proof read.
You make Australia out to be a military powerhouse. I can only WISH!
It will be good eqwiped with top class gear. Only problem it's too little. Australia still missing several platforms it really needs to be able to defend. 1. is a aircraft carrier. 2. long range bombers. If you look at south Korea desined cvx carrier it will be eqwiped with a number of platform aircraft including drones and even a 16 cell Mk41 VLS to protect the ship. Why can't Australia build something like that? Australia could also build a MQ28 ghost bat drone into a long range bomber varent rather than build AI short range fighters that have no range outside Australian borders without mid air refuelling support
@@Nathan-ry3yu Why would Australia need an aircraft carrier? That is a power projection platform not a defensive one. Couple that with the fact that the carrier would require a sizeable portion of the surface and sub fleet to protect it, and if you are talking rotation probably most of it. Couple that with the fact that Australia would have no carrier when it goes into maintenance and refit and during that time skills in both sailors and airmen would degrade. I haven't seen anything about a VLS on the CVX but I might have missed that, though it seems weird to me. Even discounting that the size of the ROKN is about the same as the entire ADF and has a far larger surface fleet than Australia by multiples, not to mention double the population and an economy 1/3 or so bigger to support an armed forces that size.
@@Nathan-ry3yucarriers and long range bombers are power projection offensive assets, not for defence. They are also costly and need lots of logistics and infrastructure in place to maintain and operate. Even smaller carriers operated by UK and France has thousands of crew onboard and thousands more support personnel, Australia only has population of about 25 million.
@@penitent2401I can tell your not from Australia. As you talking a load of crap to say Australia don't have the population to oporate an aircraft carrier. I think you need to follow up in the 1960s to 1980s Australia once had 2 aircraft carriers. With the old Melbourne been decommissioned in the 1980s. We had a lot smaller population back then. 1979 the year I was born Australian population was only just on 14 million people. We have 27 million today. The whole point I'm saying is Australia needs an offensive capability. We have to be able to take the fight to enamy not be just a defensive player. The war in the pacific during ww2 was won by aircraft not by destroyers and frigates or troops on the ground. Without adding aircraft it will be difficult to face of with an enemy without carriers. Especially out at sea. The whole point is to be able to project out as far as possible. So enamy can't take the fight to you. If you know about how ww2 was won in the pacific you will see aircraft carriers are important. You can't defeat an enamy if you can't take the fight to the enamy. The whole point is to be able to project out far as possible so the enemy can't take the fight to you. That's the whole point why Australia needs offensive capability. And having a aircraft carrier is needed
@@Nathan-ry3yu those old carriers were just flight deck slapped on a hull. Modern carriers are much more technical needing tons more supporting logistics and much larger size for all the stuff it needs to be able to do to justify being a carrier. The last carrier Australia has spend 4 months out of every year docked up for constant refits and repair and the modern ones needs even more, so you would need at least 2-3 of them. We've had consideration for getting new carriers several times and each time it failed due to costs and lack of manpower required. Carriers also needs escort fleet, Australia don't have an abundance of surface vessels as it is. As for offensive capabilities, that's what our submarines fleet (although current ones are dangerously close to outdated) and the US.
We've reached age of long range missiles and drones that can be fielded on much smaller and cost effective vessels.
number of personnel doesn't mean anything, you could have an army of a million, but if your command/control and supply abilities are crap then it's just a million mouths to feed.
Good for Australia 🇦🇺 👍
The 'Diggers' have always had good quality, in every aspect.
There aren't all that many of them, though.
Hopefully Australia expands it's military.
Quality wise, china has nothing on Australia. However, china's only advantage is their vast numbers...
That can, of course, be 'adjusted...
If what I understand to be happening is correct, Australian military doctrine is now changing to the point that the vast majority of our infantry is being brought to be equivalent to USA and British marines, we are also setting up rapid air response battalions. Basically the Australian military has decided that a small army that is basically all marines or airborne unites is the way to go.
I’m sure a couple of Chinese soilders don’t wanna be there, so some would most likely surrender.
there doing a big recruitment thing im doing my application now and am on the last step they want to expand by 10000 personnel in a set time limit
@@Lurlene.👍
if aus and chin go to war then us and britin will step in to help aus
AUSTRALIA IS NEXT SUPERPOWER OF THE WORLD!🙏🇦🇺💒⛪🕍✝️✡️🕎✈️🛩️🚁🚀🛰️🪂🚤🛥️⛴️🪨💪😍👍🦘💪💪💪
😂😂😂
I stand with Australia 🇦🇺 🦘
During the Korean War, Australia put together and commanded a force comprising, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, and India, to defeat the Chinese. Surely they don’t want the be humiliated, again.
The aussies & Canadians 800 odd in fight stopped a chinees division 15thousand from taking soul both units awarded presidential citations, not to shabby bet they haven't forgotten that license 😉a
@@peterpayne9869 Correct, not too shabby. The Australian force was the second largest in the Korean War, from a country of 8.0M, it was a significant effort.
I’m Australian and I support conscription. We have the greatest lifestyle on earth and public services, supports and welfare above and beyond other nations on earth. As a result we have a small population of Australians… about 8% who will not work, simply don’t want to. For those relying permanently on public services, conscription should be compulsory to defend this incredible lifestyle that we all love. Every person should be forced to contribute, and that is the most beneficial contribution a person could make.
conscription is a terrible idea, the defence force has no use for people who are put there by force and dont want to be there, its not a finishing school for wayward youth, and my opinion is backed up by eleven years of service in the Australian army, how many did you do?
@@GUNHOWITZERcouldn’t agree more, It would be a complete disaster 👍👍❤️🇦🇺
Imagine how crap our army would be then,,, all the bludgers
@@GUNHOWITZER our defence force only has about 80,000 where as China has 2 million and Russia over a million. We also had our guns stripped from us. What will we do if we’re invaded?
@@tomhocking5606why would they bother invading? Far more strategic to hit us from offshore and form blockades that stop us from doing anything rather than boots on the ground and going through the nightmare that is urban warfare.
I noticed they didn't compare the numbers of troops, tanks etc. compared with China. If New Zealand was a threat, then NZ should be worried, but China ...
these days its not just a numbers game. considering the war could start and end without a single person leaving either country, its all about allies and resources
China has every reason to be scared of Australia's growing military might and all its allies.Long may the UK and Oz stay together.
if the liberal party gets voted next election in 2025 australia will go nuclear which would make them more dangerous
If America and England are to busy with their own defence we are screwed ❤️🇦🇺
Are you delusional? We don't HAVE a military.
If only that wads true half our kit is broken and inoperable like our subs thatvare always in dry dock. Our vehicles which end up being no good for operational use in some cases.
@@andyt654 "in some cases". at least we dont have to replace our fuel with water. our military is ranked so highly because it is small and highly trained. an aussie infantryman is one of the best in the world compared to their peers in other nations.
Multiple New York times best selling Author Bill Bryson put it like this:
(and he wasn't wrong).
“Australia is mostly empty and a long way away. Its population is small and its role in the world consequently peripheral. It doesn't have coups, recklessly overfish, arm disagreeable despots, grow coca in provocative quantities, or throw its weight around in a brash and unseemly manner. It is stable and peaceful and good."
As the most stable, wealthy and powerful nation in the Southern Hemisphere, if the northern hemisphere ever emolliates itself in a fiery holocaust and Australians ever inherit the earth through default, those emerging on the other side could do worse.
A job Australia would never wish to have and of course we hope and pray that never eventuates - which is probably another good reason why Australia might, unfortunately, be precisely the right candidate for the job and another reason why the world could do worse.
Said it before and I’ll say it again. Australia must cut ties with china. Invest heavily in the trade market with Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom and her commonwealth and of course the United States, these are the brothers we fight alongside. These are the brothers who will aid us in time of crisis and have proven this in the past. I see absolutely no reason why we should continue to enrich china when our trade money could go towards creating a manufacturing boom in countries like Tonga, samoa, Fiji and PNG. As well as materials and technology from USA and Canada and Great Britain.
And as an Australian I want my government outright harassing the USA and UK about carriers they maybe about to retire patriot systems and anything the Americans and British may deem appropriate for sale. Let’s get it all.
we can do business with the Chinese without getting into bed with them
@@alexlanning712but we feeding the enamy though. What Australia sells to China they make military eqwipment out of it to threaten us and the region. Australia should cut all minerals trade and make it ourselves
Rubbish. The empire is dead and has been for more than half a century. Don't be so juvenile; we can do business with the Chinese and still maintain cultural ties with the UK and other Commonwealth countries.
The UK is a sinking ship; I wouldn't be tying mine to theirs.
None of these countries and governments are perfect; don't look at the world through simplistic glasses.
@@alexlanning712 no i would rather if AUS starved them of coal
China is worried? Is this a joke rite?
For the next few weeks the largest contingent of foreign troops on Australia soil will be those guys at the Shoalwater Bay Military Training Area...almost 6000 troops this year. It was decades since I was there the Australian hospitality was/is great.
Technology, training, discipline and motivation will beat sheer numbers any day of the week. All we have to ensure is that we have more rounds than targets. The End.
2 million > 80 thousand
China isn't worried about anything. And our government isn't concerned either. The Port of Darwin has a chinese held 99 year lease. Other Chinese companies own just over 50% of the entire NSW power grid. China also has over 840 000 ha of freehold land (4th behing Netherlands, USA and UK), and another 8300 000ha of leasehold land. China invading us is like firebombing your investment property.
That's buggerall compared to the size of the country.
China worried about Australia... really 😅😅
As an Australian we have a very complex history with conscription. In ww1 we were the only nation that was entirely volunteer. The results speak for themselves. In ww2 we used conscription and manipulation to enlarge our armed forces. I don’t see a need for conscription without a major war. Ww3 kicks off and we should start conscription immediately.
i sort agree how ever i would like a model like Israel. i would like our youth to be better prepared .
By then it would be too late. It takes months just for basic training. We tried this in WW2 and ended up putting troops in the field with not enough training. We need to bring in a plan for this now, and develop forward areas in PNG and the Islands NOW! Otherwise we are going to be caught out again.
Australia fighting against an adversary in the jungles, as we did will in WW2, now, is largely obsolete. Conscripts … If there were call-ups, they would better find themselves in front of computer screens. A Chinese Solomons adversary
Conscription is for the defence of Australia, which is why in WWII conscripts could stay on the Papua New Guinea side of the border if they chose to.
I dont support conscription but i do wish & believe it should be add unto High-school education - Basic Military Training For All Australian Citizens kind of like what South Korea has but more relaxed. more its just a initial Civil/Military Arms Training to lean or lead the youth into it. & On top of that open a door to University Military Personnel Grants to higher education & Private level Medical Care, if you join military they pay for your higher education , If You Apply thru The military as its apart of your Training Overall. = Giving Young Australian Ability to OPT in to military & get Educational & Medical benefit from it to.. & would lead more into the military sign ups Without Conscription. is more a trade off with benefits.. & then possibly employed by the army/navy/airforce Full time..
Well before WW1 Australia had a defence policy where young men of a certain age had to be members of a rifle club and actively had to attend. This created the diggers of WW1 which helped them become good shots. I think something like this would be great but the weapons stay onsite in armouries after you have a shoot. No guns in the community. Have the Army or police be in charge of these armouries and rifle ranges. Maybe site these ranges next to or near existing Army Reserve units who takes over responsibility of these ranges?
www.awm.gov.au/articles/encyclopedia/conscription/universal_service
This doesn't look good. 59 tanks - it is literally nothing. 72 fighter jets - it is nothing. Just compare numbers to the tiny Israel, if you are afraid of comparing to China or Russia.
59 tanks ? Ukraine loses that many in a week.
@@zoek1133 exactly
@@zoek1133yeah we are woefully unprepared for any war, let alone one with a country/military as massive as china.
Say what you want you want about the individual soldier’s ability, but sheer numbers alone having higher quality infantry men on average won’t even come close to being enough to actually have a crack at winning a war.
Our nation and its citizens safety in the event of a war with china, is purely reliant on how committed America is to protecting us along side with our own troops. Without America being fully invested in it we’d never stand a chance if china genuinely wanted to invade, we just don’t have enough of anything to stop that huge of a force they can produce.
You do know our submarines spend about 80% of their time in drydock as the Collins class was a disastrous purchase for Australia
@@chrisleach3958 Do you know that your 80% stat is complete and utter crap?
Australia has 72 F35's as stated but also has 25 x G18F and 12 F18G fighters. Total = 108.
If everyone stayed on their own soil and waters.what then.......
I don't think China has anything to worry about. Thanks to our government, our troop numbers are dwindling every day.
I don't think China is to be worried.
Yeah, they don’t want to have a repeat of the last time they went to war against Australia.
Conscription is a good idea for the security of the Australia, but I would like to see it put to the vote first so that it's clear that the majority of the population agree with it.
😆 am i the only one who noticed that they randomly put New Zealand's Flag in the video for like no reason at all. LMAO who ever made this video can tell the difference between four red stars and six white stars.
Well this as not aged well with the changes to navy procurement plans
Australia has never needed conscription. It will be different in the future, immigration has drastically changed that and i doubt we will have overwhelming volunteers anymore.
With a war actually kicking off I think people would be surprised how much that can really spark peoples sense of patriotism.
No doubt conscription will be needed. In general there will be a lot less people willing to volunteer, but people also underestimate just how much people’s views about fighting can change when it’s actually happening, in real time to their homes and loved ones.
no dole bludgers in defence .....period
The only real advantage Australia has is its size. Any one that lands at the top end with the speeds modern military vehicles travel are looking at a five day trip to Australian cities. They can't land any closer or they will be splattered coming ashore. But trying to move through a hostile desert with the RAAF on your case is a nightmare. God help them if they run into the wildlife.
I very much doubt this.
Numbers mean nothing, Aussie lesbians alone would wipe all those numbers out with ease. China has never been able to show they are capable of doing things.
You didn’t mention the Redback troop carrier.
Oceania BeLike: Dont underestimate me
The ADF is professional but the budget has been cut in real terms, the navy is still the same size as it was 50 years ago only with less power projection and less defensive protection. For example the two LHDs such as HMAS has no defensive capabilities and no fixed wing fighters. The Airforce fighter fleet is also much smaller and in bases that have No defensive protection. The army is having retention issues, with only 50 tanks which is half the size of 50 years ago, using APCs from the Vietnam war and replacements have been cut from 400 to only 129 units, so everything isn’t as it appears in this video.
Same with things in this comment, HMAS Canberra and Adelaide were never intended to host fixed wing aircraft. They were acquired in the aftermath of the Timor INTERFET operation when it was brought to light that Australia's lift capacity to transport troops offshore was woefully inadequate as they can transport over 1000 troops and equipment. With the exception of the F-111's the fighter force whilst smaller in terms of what we had with the Mirages etc the power projection is greater with the air to air refuelling we have now as well as the command and control the E7 Wedgetails provide.
The real asset behind the Canberras aren't the aircraft but the tanks and armoured vehicles it can land on the islands to our north. But yes, it would be nice. Hopefully their replacements can have fixed wing aircraft.
@@dan7564 The LHD's were not bought for the purpose of fixed wing operations you are right. If Australia were to ever want to go down that route though I doubt it they would probably need something like the America Class or a little smaller in size so that the amphibious carrying capability isn't degraded. Even then having half a dozen F-25B's onboard, I am not sure what you would do with them that you couldn't with another platform.
2 new armoured MBT Brigades and 1 recon infantry support
they will be suppliedwith more modernised vechiles suited to Australian climate and training.
we need to concentrate on drone technology. Its a game changer in Ukraine. $200 dollar drones taking out tanks etc that cost millions.
Start stockpilling millions of drones and teaching children to adults with fpv simulations
And it's getting easier and easier to JAM those drones. What exactly are we to do then.?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 it takes a fellow with American accent to tell that to Australia.
Australia military budget $50bil you gave is AUD not USD, the military budget is 2% of GDP not over 3%. 2% is the recommended yearly budget according to NATO
Thanks for that report . I just canceeled my comedy channel and now i can watch you
I think we should bring back national service..its good for our youth to learn how to survive and fight..also helps with respect for our country…
As too china attacking us..doesn’t make sense but thats not too say that they will attempt to take control of our trade routes..
Would be a very messy situation to get involved in a war with the west..but the way the world is going we will prob end up in some conflict in the future unfortunately…
Not really called aircraft carriers. Additionally the helicopters are Army not airforce.
We need a proper aircraft carrier with F35C’s. The Canberra class is an amphibious assault ship. Not an aircraft carrier. Australia should buy one of the UK’s carriers. Or rent one. We have the AUKUS agreement. It can’t just be about submarines.
Conscription was not exactly abolished in 1972. The legislation was disabled when the Whitlam government declined to appoint conscription boards to administer it. However the Act could be revived. More, the Defence Act 1903 (still in force) allows the Governor-General (essentially, the Commonwealth government) to proclaim conscription as it sees fit, provided Parliament approves within 90 days. Australia is not equipped for China, but its armed forces are set up to be a more than useful ally in any conflict in the Pacific.
Music is too loud mate
ARM ,ARM,ARM,ARM !
Need to add a correction in the narration, " Conscription" is illegal under the Australian Constitution. 2 Referendums were held during WW1 on the introduction of Conscription and both were defeated. After WW2 we had " National Service", It was not conscription.Australia was one of the first and still one of the only countries that has a " Professional Military" ie Volunteer's
Sounds a lot like "mandatory vaccinations" Not law but "mandatory"
1:18 that's the New Zealand flag.
We need more aircraft carriers and subs
To think that I’m watching this in 2024
The economy figures are rubbery for ALL countries, for economies are talked about in US$ , which gives a silly projection...for instance, if the conversion rate A$ to US$ was what it was 5 years ago, the economy would be US2.6 TRILLION, wo this is quite a variation and it would therefore put the military investment to 95 Billion, this figure actually gives a better representation of the trajectory Australia has taken in recent years in defence procurement.
The current Australia isnt worth fighting for, maybe all our woke mob could fight it for us and those Politicans dont mind getting there hands dirty. 😂😂😂
Our defence spending at 3.14% of GDP is greater than most NATO nations and is far and away greater than Canada a similar sized nation. We don’t need conscription as we don’t need to turn the military into a finishing school. We need professional, well educated and well trained personnel who are motivated to wear the uniform.
Australia would get wrecked
They did very good to hold of enemies in the past including won battles that larger countries couldn't pull off. They had an even smaller population back then. So the Aussies are not to be underestimated. They can punch far above their own wight
@Nathan-ry3yu especially if us Kiwis are there to help. ANZACs all the way!
Yeah thats what others said in WW1, WW2, Korea , Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. As years go the popuation increases, we get richer and develop more capability to defend ourselves. We have no interest in aggression but threaten either Australia or our ANZAC mates in NZ and see how you go.
@user-bi8wp6wy3l Those of us, who have a firm grip of the 'family', would fight with us. The woke forkers, are fodder!
That's what Rommel said.
Once this new Labor govt gets through with our defence forces we wont have one
Bullshit, the military expansion is bipartisan. They know something, they're not telling us and I think we're in a position where time is a factor.
The Hunter frigates will replace the ANZAC frigate, not the Canberra class. The Ghost Bat won't be carried by F-35s, it is too large.
Need to change your flag in the video , that’s a New Zealand flag 🤔
We couldn’t defend a suburb in Sydney…😂
Australia needs to start developing and upscaling the manufacture of defense systems within its own borders. When wars happen the country that can feed and replace military assets rapidly will be the winner. use the Ukraine as an example.... Its almost totally reliant on the whims and support of other countries. World war 2 showed that the winner out resources, out fights and out builds the enemy.
Australia will. Long range missiles. Nuclear submarines, SNN AUKUS, AI drones and Scramjets and QM.
Due to the monumental failures of both the Labor and Liberal Government we are now in a situation where just one of the CCP's hypersonic multi tipped nuclear warhead missiles can reach are shores in only two (2), count them two (2) minutes, but don't take my word, look it up! The only solution for Australia is to become Chinese and roll over and give them everything that we have worked and built up since our nation was formed. Otherwise we can do what is right for the Australian people and our beautiful country and that is to vote for Pauline Hanson and One Nation, we have no need for the WEF and their agenda, yet our tough and gritty PM he so easily rolled over and agreed to sign you up to their agenda without you having a say. We are a nation built on trust and a fair go for all Australian's no matter how long you have been here, that's just our way and if you enjoy living like this then you must vote for Pauline Hanson and One Nation, it's time they are provided with their fair chance to help all Australian's. Unless we all dig in and agree to avoid the WEF's life altering and for the worse consequence is not for Australia. We must keep China at bay and finally we must form a republic so that we may quit the Kingdom and stand up for what is good and right for all Australian's and not those English or other foreigners who take so much from our country and give so very little, in fact 'nothing of financial value' in return. There was a time when leaders from either side including the Greens had a backbone, they always sought to put Aussie's first, this is no longer the case and unless we return to the days where Aussies take care of Aussies, no matter what your background or how long you have been here, remember we are all in this together. so we must now unite and all agree that Australia will go our own way, we will do what is right for all Australian's as there is plenty to go around and that we are on longer used to financially enrich people from other nations because that's the way it has always been done. All Australian's no matter how long you have been a citizen, if you like your wealth opportunities, if you love your Aussie lifestyle, your nice home, your freedoms and our way of life here in Australia, just know that if we continue down this path of 'more of the same' under the 'Labour or Liberal' Government then all that is yours will no longer be and life as we know it is gone. Vote Pauline Hanson and One Nation if you want for Australia to stay the way it has always been and free of foreigners and the WEF deciding what you can have and what you can do on any set day, this is only a part of what they have planned for you.
The have go this totally wrong, HMAS Canberra LHD is not been replaced by the hunter class frigate! The Anzac class frigate will be replaced by the hunter class frigate. Get it correct or don’t post/ miss information .
All crap aside the only war we are in with china is a economic and cyber war which we have been in for a few years now, the only war we could win against china is an economic and cyber war.. Anything on the kinetic side of warfighting is irrelevant because we would lose.. Our country relies on imports to function, we have very little manufacturing and even less reserves, as for conscription we do not have enough equipment for to mass mobalise troops nor do we have the industry to sustain it.. The only advantage we have in a kinetic war is any invading country would have to bring everything with them and those logistical support lines would be targeted by our allies, just like we have to import everything for our economy to function any country that invades us would have to do the same.. Canberra has already basically done the burn everything policy for our countries defence..
AUKUS was formed to counterbalance an aggressive China. In early earlier approaches to military spending, Australia has always had advanced modern weapons, yet has tried not to alarm Indonesia by being a too powerful neighbour. Hence, Australia didn’t deploy nuclear weapons in 1960s. Moreover, Australia has almost ones access to US weapons, can pay for then, and often helps develop weapons with its American friends. Australia plans to spend AUD 368 billion on current generation nuclear submarines and under AUKUS next generation nuclear submarines in 2030s for the 2040s.
A concern for the Americans was it needed build more current generation nuclear submarines. Australia said it would pay for a new US slipway.
Australia will need US help to develop a warfare nuclear technology. In return, Australia will its World’s best RADAR technology. Both countries plan to work closer on scramjets, drones, AI (with UK too) and QM.
(The Ghost Bat is not “carried” by the F-35. Multiple GB AI drones accompany the jet, which can act as a command centre of the AI drones can act autonomously. If some in the swarm are shot down, the others can reformulate their roles to achieve their ultimate goal (s). US Boeing subcontracted development to Australia.
Why would you aggressive when China is not even Aus enemy but trading partner?
Australia not going to fight China. They just both having an argument with eachother caused by America international interference It will blow over in time. China Australia and USA need eachother. The three countries will never fight eachother the 3 of them are dependant on eachother. Australia the minerals. China the manufacturing. The US the largest buyers. Australia main military build up is because of Indonesia both countries hate eachother. Indonesia has been a threat to Australia since the 60s. So Australia makes sure they are militarily more advanced. Australia not going to use it against China. Like I said Australia needs China. Also some of Australia military eqwipment has become dated or is about to be dated. So they only replacing equipment with new and new capabilities. Every country does that to what they can afford. Australia buys the best their money can buy.
Stop the crap, the Australian military has nothing the Chinese need to be worried about. Our military is pathetic the equipment is crap. That's why young Aussies won't join, the pay and condition are crap. Promotion takes for ever and the pension scheme is crap, ask those who have served in years gone by. You can't even get the youth to join the military and no one's got the guts to bring out conscription. What a joke.
This presentation is very out of date and inaccurate. I am ex-Aussie Army so I do keep track of such things.
Australia is buying 75 M1A2 SEPV3 to replace the 59 M1A1. We are buying 211 (133 turreted) Boxer CRV (30mm, Spike ATGM, Iron Fist active protection) . We are buying 129 Redback IFV (armament as per Boxer) to partially replace our 450 upgraded M113. Also adding AS9 and AS10 155mm SPG's.
Australia is setting up a brand new missile Brigade with 42 Himars, the new NASAMs system (20+ units) and an anti ship capability of unknown number of mobile firing units (NSM or other). The current 21 Tiger ARH will be replaced by more than 30 Apache AH64E's, and the MRH90 by UH60's.
On the Naval front the Canberra's will continue, the current 3x Aegis equipped (48 VLS) Destroyers as well, the 8x ANZAC's (with 8x VLS) replaced by 6 Hunter class (with 96 VLS, latest Aegis systems) + 6-8 Meko 200 based or similar frigates + 4-6 of the minimally manned or unmanned ships (expected to be from the US program). The 6x Collins class replaced by initially 6-8 Virginia class and then added to via the new AUKUS submarines made in UK for both navies. Essentially a significant number of additional ships over next 10-20 years...
In addition to all this additional drones, including more Tritons, potentially more P8 Poseidon's (to add to current fleet, with Australia being around 3rd largest operator in the world).
The 59 M1A1 are suppose the be upgraded to M1A2's in addition to the 75 new M1A2's. or has the Canberra brains trust canceled it to piss more money away into the wind..?? The increase of MBT's was suppose to offset the downgrading of APC's..
@@user-xm3fo5vu1s my understanding is the 59 original M1A1's will go back to the US in trade...so the new force will only be the 75 M1A2 SepV3's. Australia never keeps the 'old models' when they bring new equipment into service typically.
@@thomasconc They were suppose to be upgraded with the delivery of additional M1A2's which are upgraded variants from the USA reserve stockpile..
If they are no longer in addition to the 75 than they will be 59 of the 75 meaning 59 that do not need the depleted uranium armour removed like the rest of our M1A2's are having done to them..
I am pretty sure we bought something like 140 or 160 abrams from the US reserves for our 75 M1A2's sepV3 and spares.. I was just curious if it was another gutted project from albo and his mates from the useless canberra brains trust..
@@user-xm3fo5vu1s that is not my understanding based on an article I read that defined the procurement. Ie. around 75 gun hulls delivered as upgraded SepV3's and around 25-28 other variants - assuming M88 recovery types - to add up to just over 100 procured. Then the old non-upgraded hulls returned to the US.
@@thomasconc The old MBT's we use to lease from the yanks, they were apart of the original procurement, although this has gone through multiple governments and multiple defence reviews which leads to procurement changes.. How old is the article have you got name of who posted it, i'm interested in checking it out myself.. Wikipedia is not really a good source although i recently seen on there that the M1A1 are still listed as being upgraded to M1A2's as the newer delivery of the M1A2, it's been that way for a while on a few sources including defence connect and others..
I have not seen anywhere saying we are returning any MBT's back to USA, it seems to be the same as our 59 M1A1 are still being upgraded to M1A2's at the same time as we take delivery of the additional 75 M1A2's.. Under Labor with them gutting our Army i wouldn't be surprised if they reduce numbers or gut the procurement like they have elsewhere.. I lost interest in it all after the last DSR when Canberra decided to gut our Army again, i am curious to see the article you seen and what date it was posted etc if it's recent or older..
You showed a New Zealand flag instead of an Australian and the the previously elected politicians.
Some one with the id High Country replied to me saying Australia DID have conscription in WW1 and that he was a published military historian, I wanted to send him a reply as he is wrong! Only when I clicked there was no where to leave him a reply. Sad.
Billy Hughes?
no i would not support conscription
This would have to be the most delusional and deceptive clip I have ever seen on our defence capabilities,after a week of heavy fighting we don’t have even enough ammunition to resupply our weapons systems. Most of that defence budget has been blown on submarines that we are never going to get,along with other failed defence projects. Without American support we are totally screwed, if America is too busy with their own defence I don’t hold much hope for our survival. As for conscription,I’m personally not a fan,I think that our volunteer current system is one of our greatest assets,being forced to do something is never going to get good results on a modern battlefield and definitely won’t get the calibre of troops required . 👁️👁️😎🐕🦺❤️🙏🦘🐨🇦🇺
Your taking the piss out of us ... right?
Tell the trueth about covid.Maybe it could have saved lives .MAYBE
Yhe Australian Army in WW1 WAS all volunteer, the Government of the day WANTED conscription but it never happened as the public DID NOT want it! Indeed the situation of replacing losses became so severe that Australian forces had to stop particikpating in conflic in Europe BEFORE the end of the war in 1918 as they could not replace their losses, yet I see some crazy wrong comments below. In WW2 there was conscription.
Bill Hughes pressed, yet failed?
Correct and THAT was WW1 NOT 2@@petersinclair3997
@@HenriHattarYou are correct. WW1.
this video is poorly researched, the adf is on a huge down curve, the retention rate is so low due to the lack of pay and idiots that run this country. If WW3 was to happen they will have to hold a draft as no one is going to want to fight. as for the HMAS Canberra being replaced by the frigat is crazy, two different ships designed to do two different things.
Um are we time travelers, have we skipped the last 40 years, are we a world superpower to contend with, I think Albo's mixed up his capabilities with his Abilities, if he starts his farfetched dream of all the military might and hardware, he and other leaders before him have planned then we will have to wait 40 years for this to happen, a lot of us won't be here, we can always ask Australia not to be attacked till we are ready, but the world knows this
By the way there are many other valid credentialed references out there. They ALL say the same thing,don't know what is the matter with this guy?
This is sarcasm? You can't be for real lol
WHAT 4 SHIPS? B.S
All our troops in WW1-WW2 were volunteers
No they were not, in WW1 YES..in WW2 NO!
NO! Thwy did NOT have conscription in WW1, indeed the Australian forces in WW1 were withdrawn from the fighting sometime in 1918 due t o numbers not being able to be replaced, conscription was what the Government wanted but tge deal was defeated and it never happened!
@@highcountrydelatite
@@HenriHattarww2 wasn't conscription for ADF it was after Korea war they brought it in. And demolished it after the Vietnam War. National service in Australia was between 1965 to 1972. My dad was conscripted into the Vietnam war. He was 18 years old 1965 when he had to register
My grandfather lied about his age he was 17 when he joined ADF in 1939. He stayed in the army and was a captain during the Korean war. Australia had 1 million men and women serving during ww2. With a population just over 7 million with everyone of them being volunteers.
The reason why Australia abolished national service is because the pension they had to pay out from being sued by men and women who was forced into the vutnam war. It wasn't because Australia couldn't afford it.
That is what I said the ADF were volunteers in both wars the constipation referefam was defeated twice.Vietnam we had conscription but not for long.
Nathan, please brush your brians and have a read of THE TRUTH, which is out there if you care to look AND it's easy to find, let's start with your LAST dumb remark first, about conscription for the Vietnam war, the lottery was held for people turning 20...NOT 18 in a particular year and conscription was ONLY stopped due to a change in Government, when the labour Government , under Gough Whitlam came to power, one of their platforms was to end conscription. Now let's travel back in time a bit to WW2 and look at THAT dumb remark too. For as early as 1939 Australia had a LIMITED form of conscription, this developed further and in January of 1943 it was full blown conscription with the inductees being sent any where to fight! This is ALSO available for any half literate being to find out very easy if they want to !A little bit MORE for you Nathan, conscription did NOT happen during the Lorean war, you are RIGHT there, however, it was only SEMI intrioduced after that as a 3 month , basically part time/weekend stint BEGORE it becoming a 2 year continuous conscript period FOR the Vietnam War. Where DO YO(U get your load of garbage from Nathan? IO hope the brain brushing illuminates something up there.
🥱
Very outdated video. Lost has changed since this was produced.
What a load of rubbish.
Pure BS
LOL the comment is a joke , right
There is no need for conscription!
The australian defence force is actually very competitive and many apply but do not get in.
It is the budget that prevents more people from serving
No Australia is low on recruits
@@kingseb2252 please explain further.
@@jessewhite2226 Australia isn't getting enough recruits and we have a shortage of people interested that's why there are so many defence ads and stuff and conscription can work look at finland
@@kingseb2252 I have many friends and colleagues in the ADF, and yes at times they do that priority roles to fill. But there is high interest in joining the ADF. That's why there are many jobs closed, and priority roles are often filled quickly.
Read Sharri Marksons Book
No
Yeah bs
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha so funny
😂