He said he's new to this but in my opinion, I understood the concept better with him explaining it than any other self-proclaimed" wavetable professional online.
Your explanation of this enabled me to really connect the dots. A year into music production and I'm now discovering the concept of sound design and how to use synthesizers. I was discouraged for a while b/c I wanted to create more cinematic sounds. Yet I had no idea that all those knobs and twists I'd been avoiding were THE answer. Seeing it in the beginning was extremely daunting. Like being in a foreign land and not knowing the language. But now a world have possibilities have opened up for me. Your explanation was so concise, informative, and detailed. THANK YOU.
Quite possibly the best explanation of wavetable synthesis I've ever seen, really fun to follow along, and so many 'lightbulb' moments after trying to wrap my head around it for so long!
He does that to you. He takes a complex topic you couldn't understand for the life of you and explains it so that a five-year-old could understand it, without omitting any important details. One point in which I have to object his explanations though is around 3 minutes in. He says that having a basically unlimited number of permutations in the oscillator is what gives wavetable synths their unique sound. I think this makes them absolutely not unique, since you can just imitate the oscillator of any other synth. The fact that analog synths all have slightly different characteristics in their oscillators, based on what components were used and how they're made, down to the very impedance in their circuits, gave each and every one of them a unique sound. Even when trying really hard, you couldn't make a Moog and a Roland sound exactly the same, they'd always have slight differences. With wavetables, this uniqueness is dead and gone.
@@LeBoomStudios yea that's true, but with enough skill and/or technology, you could create the uniqueness, and potentially create other unique stuff, exactly as it sounds in you head. That includes relatively simplistic sounds similar to the subtractive oscillators that ur talking abt. This is literally my first video on eavetables so idk if people use them for that already, but I think you could get some really sick sounds like that.
@@LeBoomStudios and another thing, I actually came to this after additive synthesis, which seems to be talked about like the graphene of synthesis lol, and for good reason. But anyways, I thought about combining wavetables with additive synthesis, and even using traditional oscillators as bigger packets of harmonics to use in the additive portion, which you could already recreate in modern wavetables, to basically create the ultimate sound synthesis machine lol. And if we're lucky then maybe with skill, and maybe the help of more technology like AI or something, we can learn pattern that create certain or specific sounds, including those in the physical world with accuracy, and maybe even recreate small unique kinks like you said in old analog synthesizers. As well as real physical sounds and instruments in the real world ofc. And then combine them and all kinds of things, can u imagine. I think that would be awesome and would love to see what people come up with with that.
I come from electric guitar world, but as a mix engineer and a dabbler in arrangements and more importantly a fan of sound in life and existence, this explanation was my graceful discovery of a new land in sound generation.
Pigments is probably my favourite VST, likely in part because of the huge library of awesome presets it comes with, but the whole engine is amazing. Fun fact! Ensoniq tried to make wavetables a thing with their hardware samplers a few decades ago. They called their version of it "transwaves" but I don't think it got a lot of use. They implemented it by modulating the loop location in the wave by increments of the loopsize, so it was pretty memory hungry.
New learner, literally just RUclips'd 'Arturia Pigments' as it's what I've got before me in FL Studio '20. Found something beautiful and informative! What a world we live in.
Really nice video - pretty new to wavetable synthesis and didn't know Arturia even made one until I found this vid... That bass sound in the demo at the end is DOPE!! Love the way it morphs between the notes with so much harmonic richness and character! Beautiful :)
Hey great video Justin. Thank you. I just downloaded the demo and played with it for a few minutes, I have no idea what I'm doing but I am loving what coumes out of Pigments.
I love pigments it’s been my fav synth for the last 2 years I use it on every one of my non sampled tracks. Serum and Massive X are dope too but the UI and the workflow + sound in pigments is unmatched imo
Interesting how he says that in 2018 you are more likely to find wavetable synthesis in a software instrument rather than hardware.....fast forward to 2020-2022 and there's the Pro 3, HydraSynth, Iridium, Quantum, M, Summit, Peak, Modwave, and now Roland's N/Zyme expansion for the Fantom.
Always enjoy watching this dude.. whatever the demo but this wavetable looks alot clearer and easier to understand..for me anyways.. the one in live was pretty hard to grasp definitely checking this pigments out thanks
This is a revelation. I recently read a similar book, and it was a revelation in itself. "The Art of Meaningful Relationships in the 21st Century" by Leo Flint
Thanks my friend...this has made the subject so understandable for me. Now I am keen to get back into malstrom and even easier in Thor even though it hasn’t got as many wavetables. Again...thanks sooo much! Edit..the visuals have given me a new understanding on modulations as well( I’m new to this)😊
Ok that was a good intro to wavetable, but it really didn't even touch on how you use them for sound design and why to use a wavetable versus another synthesis method...
Thought: If a waveform from a pure old-school wavetable synth is identical to the waveform of an analog synth, it follows that it should sound every bit as "warm and pleasing" as an analog synth, right? I guess the answer is no because the filter of the analog filter - which the waveform is going into after coming from the oscillator - is what is most responsible for the "analog sound". Unless the waveform from wave table already has the harmonics that would come from the analog filter "built in". (Great video from Reverb as usual!)
The Wavetables from old Chips from 19's Like N163 or the Famicom Disk System Use Kind of Sound Generations to Make Other Wave using Pulse Waves Formation (Like Triangle Formation or Sawtooth Formation)
at around 8 min mark, I see that there is a modulating waveform and a fixed semi sine-triangle wave, which adds some consistency to the sound. How to add that?
So as it morphs through the four stages of the wavetable, to my ear it sounds like it's basically just raising and lowering gain on the four waves that make up each stage. Is that accurate? That sounds more chunky and simple than I was expecting based on my vague non-understanding of what I've heard about WT synth before.
Thank you. Clearly it's pretty tricky to get away from what sounds like conventional sine, square, triangle, saw using reverb, delay flanger, chorus etc. into something really different.
Good explanation. So basically my Roland Fantom 6 or Roland System 8 (which together cost me over $5000) may not be able to achieve the same level of awesomeness as Serum or Massive?
An American used the phrase "your cup of tea"? At 12 minutes In England that means "your thing" but in the US that probably means dumped in the sea for being a traitor! Great video
Thanks for the video. Is reverb doing a video on the new vaporizer2. I know comparing vaporizer2 with Pigment is not apples to apples but could you state some of the strengths. I'm interested in getting vaporizer2 but I need someone with more knowledge to just state the facts. Can it do what the vendor states and does it do a great job.
I would recommend audio post-production on the video next time, especially if you have a ton of pop and cracks in the dialogue. I would love to hear some EQ and comp on it as well.
Nice video 👍 I just started to seriously put my fingers in this wavetables thing I have for years. I was not a big fan of elm crazy bass and synth, I more a smooth guy (sine wave) but I can’t lie this modern sound synthesis becomes extremely amazing and this Arturia Pigments looks really cool! 👍 again
![Wavetable Synthesis Algorithm Explained [Synth #001]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ssIJ8kFG7qs/mqdefault.jpg)
He said he's new to this but in my opinion, I understood the concept better with him explaining it than any other self-proclaimed" wavetable professional online.
Your explanation of this enabled me to really connect the dots. A year into music production and I'm now discovering the concept of sound design and how to use synthesizers. I was discouraged for a while b/c I wanted to create more cinematic sounds. Yet I had no idea that all those knobs and twists I'd been avoiding were THE answer. Seeing it in the beginning was extremely daunting. Like being in a foreign land and not knowing the language. But now a world have possibilities have opened up for me. Your explanation was so concise, informative, and detailed. THANK YOU.
Quite possibly the best explanation of wavetable synthesis I've ever seen, really fun to follow along, and so many 'lightbulb' moments after trying to wrap my head around it for so long!
He does that to you. He takes a complex topic you couldn't understand for the life of you and explains it so that a five-year-old could understand it, without omitting any important details.
One point in which I have to object his explanations though is around 3 minutes in. He says that having a basically unlimited number of permutations in the oscillator is what gives wavetable synths their unique sound. I think this makes them absolutely not unique, since you can just imitate the oscillator of any other synth.
The fact that analog synths all have slightly different characteristics in their oscillators, based on what components were used and how they're made, down to the very impedance in their circuits, gave each and every one of them a unique sound. Even when trying really hard, you couldn't make a Moog and a Roland sound exactly the same, they'd always have slight differences. With wavetables, this uniqueness is dead and gone.
@@LeBoomStudios yea that's true, but with enough skill and/or technology, you could create the uniqueness, and potentially create other unique stuff, exactly as it sounds in you head. That includes relatively simplistic sounds similar to the subtractive oscillators that ur talking abt. This is literally my first video on eavetables so idk if people use them for that already, but I think you could get some really sick sounds like that.
@@LeBoomStudios and another thing, I actually came to this after additive synthesis, which seems to be talked about like the graphene of synthesis lol, and for good reason. But anyways, I thought about combining wavetables with additive synthesis, and even using traditional oscillators as bigger packets of harmonics to use in the additive portion, which you could already recreate in modern wavetables, to basically create the ultimate sound synthesis machine lol. And if we're lucky then maybe with skill, and maybe the help of more technology like AI or something, we can learn pattern that create certain or specific sounds, including those in the physical world with accuracy, and maybe even recreate small unique kinks like you said in old analog synthesizers. As well as real physical sounds and instruments in the real world ofc. And then combine them and all kinds of things, can u imagine. I think that would be awesome and would love to see what people come up with with that.
For real 👌
I come from electric guitar world, but as a mix engineer and a dabbler in arrangements and more importantly a fan of sound in life and existence, this explanation was my graceful discovery of a new land in sound generation.
Pigments is probably my favourite VST, likely in part because of the huge library of awesome presets it comes with, but the whole engine is amazing.
Fun fact! Ensoniq tried to make wavetables a thing with their hardware samplers a few decades ago. They called their version of it "transwaves" but I don't think it got a lot of use. They implemented it by modulating the loop location in the wave by increments of the loopsize, so it was pretty memory hungry.
New learner, literally just RUclips'd 'Arturia Pigments' as it's what I've got before me in FL Studio '20. Found something beautiful and informative! What a world we live in.
@11:42 - this has been my reaction every 45 seconds of this video. Amazing stuff!
Glad I found this. Awesome tutorial. Totally loved your reaction from 11:30 to 12:10 Thanks for the video.
Killer explanation. And I love how you can see how much you enjoy yourself. The “holy shit” moment was priceless.
can you do one on fm synthesis?
FM: hardest synthesis to learn.
yep, thumbs up! Also granular would be cool, like with using the latest granular synth from Audio Damage: Quanta.
Helldorado fm is pretty simple
@Die Marmeladenfresse/Derrbenn im serious
This has everything you could ever want to know and more: ruclips.net/p/PLOMuI-j1vRxSB9oqcGoJg82N1Q7DlZJOU
This is super cool thank you! I've been struggling to get my head around the concept for ages and you just made it so simple to understand! thank you!
Really nice video - pretty new to wavetable synthesis and didn't know Arturia even made one until I found this vid... That bass sound in the demo at the end is DOPE!! Love the way it morphs between the notes with so much harmonic richness and character! Beautiful :)
Hey great video Justin. Thank you. I just downloaded the demo and played with it for a few minutes, I have no idea what I'm doing but I am loving what coumes out of Pigments.
Pigments is mighty powerful and not fully understand by many. Dig in people.
I love pigments it’s been my fav synth for the last 2 years I use it on every one of my non sampled tracks. Serum and Massive X are dope too but the UI and the workflow + sound in pigments is unmatched imo
Really love the setup of this video, feel very cozy :)
Thanks for this. Now I have a clearer understanding of what Pigments (and similar virtual instruments) can do.
Video starts at 2:33
Justin, how does Pigments match up to the Blofeld or Nave from Waldorf?
Interesting how he says that in 2018 you are more likely to find wavetable synthesis in a software instrument rather than hardware.....fast forward to 2020-2022 and there's the Pro 3, HydraSynth, Iridium, Quantum, M, Summit, Peak, Modwave, and now Roland's N/Zyme expansion for the Fantom.
A great and simple very useful lesson on wave table synthesis... COOL
Thank you!!! I really liked the ending composition too!!!
This was really, really good. Thank you.
That music at the end of the video is so amazing!!! :)
Really useful, thanks, have learned so much from Pigments because the modulations are so clear.
Can you do an in depth review of the bytebeat synth on No Man's Sky
Finally wavetable synthesis doesn't confuse me anymore. Thank you!
Always enjoy watching this dude.. whatever the demo but this wavetable looks alot clearer and easier to understand..for me anyways.. the one in live was pretty hard to grasp definitely checking this pigments out thanks
thank you for all this material. it really help me to create better songs every time. Producing instrumental music!!!
This is a revelation. I recently read a similar book, and it was a revelation in itself. "The Art of Meaningful Relationships in the 21st Century" by Leo Flint
justin did it again!! the best synths videos always!! justin we want more ore ore ore
You have a great "teacher" sensibility...good stuff!
Thanks my friend...this has made the subject so understandable for me.
Now I am keen to get back into malstrom and even easier in Thor even though it hasn’t got as many wavetables.
Again...thanks sooo much!
Edit..the visuals have given me a new understanding on modulations as well( I’m new to this)😊
Thank you for this informative, succinct, and clear to understand video on wavetable synthesis. Great job!
Ok that was a good intro to wavetable, but it really didn't even touch on how you use them for sound design and why to use a wavetable versus another synthesis method...
Informative and clear explanation!
I could listen to a whole track of just that bass at the end! 😳😍
Great job teaching the fundamentals.
Best explanation / tutorial on WT for me sofar! Thanks ! Peace
Thought: If a waveform from a pure old-school wavetable synth is identical to the waveform of an analog synth, it follows that it should sound every bit as "warm and pleasing" as an analog synth, right? I guess the answer is no because the filter of the analog filter - which the waveform is going into after coming from the oscillator - is what is most responsible for the "analog sound". Unless the waveform from wave table already has the harmonics that would come from the analog filter "built in". (Great video from Reverb as usual!)
rich reverb hear...im evolving over time!
The Wavetables from old Chips from 19's Like N163 or the Famicom Disk System Use Kind of Sound Generations to Make Other Wave using Pulse Waves Formation (Like Triangle Formation or Sawtooth Formation)
Third time lucky then? lol
Thanks for fixing the sound issue. I can hear it now. What was the problem anyway?
This was great, thanks for the effort
Surprisingly i understood this quite well. So youre cycling through multiple waves rather than affecting one with an LFO…i think?
Such a beautiful explanation!
My Favorite Synth Guy!
That last presets is sick!!!
Thank you so much, you made things clear very good.
I actually like additive synthesis on a sawtooth wave because it contains all of the harmonics 1:1 1:2 1:3 1:4 1:5 ect
How about wavetable synths, do they have souls?
Great Job man....Thank you!
This is so clear! Thank you!!!
at around 8 min mark, I see that there is a modulating waveform and a fixed semi sine-triangle wave, which adds some consistency to the sound. How to add that?
Very helpful and I love his reactions to the presets hahaha
Question: what is with the note or pitch of a tone while modulating the wave?
Nice intro to wavetables!
So as it morphs through the four stages of the wavetable, to my ear it sounds like it's basically just raising and lowering gain on the four waves that make up each stage. Is that accurate? That sounds more chunky and simple than I was expecting based on my vague non-understanding of what I've heard about WT synth before.
Nice video. Thank you. 👏🏻
How do you have so good cpu usage when you're using so many pigments templates? i have 10900k and sometimes struggles with only 1 or 2 granular pads
Thank you. Clearly it's pretty tricky to get away from what sounds like conventional sine, square, triangle, saw using reverb, delay flanger, chorus etc. into something really different.
justin delay? from reverb?
Good explanation. So basically my Roland Fantom 6 or Roland System 8 (which together cost me over $5000) may not be able to achieve the same level of awesomeness as Serum or Massive?
Thanks. Its realy instructive. Très cool merci
Pigments in my humble opinion is better than Massive and Serum. Having used all three it just sound so much more organic and the UI is fantastic.
I wish you would compare in depth Blofeld to Virus TI in wavetable context. Hardware, please.
Beautiful 👌🏽
Amazing explanation!
Amazing video, Thank you a lot !
God bless this man
propellerhead reason also have europa as their powerful waveable synth
11:42 made my day
like your gestures
minut 11: 55 preset MB2 Shapes??? I dont find in my Pigments.
best product placement ever
Makes a lot of mathematical sense! Thanks Justin.
An American used the phrase "your cup of tea"? At 12 minutes
In England that means "your thing" but in the US that probably means dumped in the sea for being a traitor!
Great video
Thanks for the video. Is reverb doing a video on the new vaporizer2. I know comparing vaporizer2 with Pigment is not apples to apples but could you state some of the strengths. I'm interested in getting vaporizer2 but I need someone with more knowledge to just state the facts. Can it do what the vendor states and does it do a great job.
what differentiates a wav from a wavetable?
I'm trying to focus but I can't stop thinking about how much I want that Keylab 61...
My only question here.... Why the hell did some people leave a thumb down? SMH
vital all the way man
Great video, very intuitive :- )
drum machines most certainly do have soul: Mihael Jackson = LINN!!
@ 11:24 dayuuummmmmmmmm...... in love!!!
@11:56 WOW!
Please explain synthesis of Korg x50
@Reverb Surprised you didn't mention that Deadmau5 is actually the co-creator/founder of Serum
don't forget Skrillex helped also
I've been a synth nerd for years but never really got wavetable until this video explained it. thanks a lot for that!
This video was absolutely useless to plants... Can you please do a video on photosynthesizers?
Try shaping ur plant like a wavetable😂😂😂😂
Sweet, I'm NOT the only person that moves their mouth when tweaking a formant filter!
Thank you thank you thank you
I would recommend audio post-production on the video next time, especially if you have a ton of pop and cracks in the dialogue. I would love to hear some EQ and comp on it as well.
Nice video 👍 I just started to seriously put my fingers in this wavetables thing I have for years. I was not a big fan of elm crazy bass and synth, I more a smooth guy (sine wave) but I can’t lie this modern sound synthesis becomes extremely amazing and this Arturia Pigments looks really cool! 👍 again
Adam Szabos Viper is all ya need
Justin Delay is a hell of teacher.
Arturia's been advertising these hard hahaha
I love my plug ins..As an Arturia Ver6 Collection owner , I shall update to this for $69....
But My Microwave I Rev2 just has a magic no plug gets..
11:09 reminds me of the old pc adlib opl2/3 banks :D
Nice track.