The process of using Mathematica to solve real world problems is quite direct and intuitive. I guess there are a lot of hard work behind this to hide the boring details of machine level.
Thank you sir... As an engineer this software has already fascinated me... And am looking forward to do some real good work with mathematica as I continue pursuing my Masters in Robotics
Well done, sir. I first got familiar with Mathematica back in 1990 with Mathematica 2.0. I will soon have Mathematica 12.1. Everything I learned thirty years ago is still valid. This program is cumulative. To my mind, nothing is thrown out. As such it is a very big program and no one will ever use all its features. Also, since this was one of the most pirated programs out there for a while, Wolfram introduced a few years back the the "hobbyist" edition for those of us who aren't students or professionals. We just want to explore with this very capable program and not come up with the big bucks this program is deserving of. My only wish is that Wolfram would come out with a paper edition of the manual. It ceased being published with the fifth edition. It would be very expensive and a true mathematic encyclopedia
I am learning these tools to understand and study the Wolfram Physics Model !!! I found this video very practical and helpful and am very grateful ! i wish I had this at college!!! Here in Australia every kid should be taught this!! It is so good it feels like cheating! I am watching everything you have made now!!!
A powerful presentation for a powerful product which I’ve enjoyed since it first came out. The “steep learning curve” argument often made is offset by the powerful tools that just do the job and the documentation and executable example library. I’m working with teachers to get Stephen and Conrad’s vision to young people. We have to do things differently than the 18th century.
For those who want to know how to get fully symbolic indices: \:2080 through \:2089 gives subscript 0 through subscript 9. Those act like any other character and Mathematica doesn’t treat them specially. So if you just want symbols with subscripts in their names - that’s how. Otherwise, - gives you “real” indices that define functions behind your back. Sometimes that’s desirable eg when using indicial notation.
Another way of seeing it is by recognizing that engineering is all applied math, so having a solid mathematical processing environment can’t but help a lot :)
Blessings for future . Just hat's off for those who are working so hard to bring this on this planet. One day its going to become world's best interactive language. Because of its very very much like ; the problem is given by teacher and i have just write give data and useful equation. This language is like FUTURERASTIC of matlab,python,c++... Can you please make some courses on coursera or edx on so all backgrounds of reserchive person get help . Awesome👏✊👍
It gets the last result (that would in this case be x[t]->3/94...) and only shows the right hand side of the rule. The [[1,1]] gets the first element of the list and [[1,1,2]] gets the right hand side of the first element of the list.
Hello good evening, I am trying to solve the following logarithm with wolfram mathematica but I can't get the program to give me a solution: Log2[X = 6] is 64 but I can't get the program to give me that solution, how do I do it as is the syntax that should i put??
what programming software to make mathematica? and what software did they use to create that programming software? just wondering, could someone solve this paradox? thx in advance
Mathematica is written in the Wolfram language. As you watch this video, the code that Jason is using is Wolfram language. Software developers at Wolfram research use the Wolfram language to program new functions (e.g., the new functionality in the upgrade from version 10 to 11). This is the reason that Mathematica can have such impressive new powerful features because the programers use the same function stack as a normal user. In other words, it is not python or C#.
Also you are a tad bit to selly, I'm already sold on the product and don't want to hear about another inferior one all the time.. I came here to learn, not to change my mind..
Justin Pearson, Thanks for a great talk, your "An Introduction to Mathematica and the Wolfram Language for Engineers" on RUclips. I am a newbie with this so it's not really an Engineering question. I am fascinated by some of the examples you give: e.g. your "Petunias" table, and also the graph of a web site that went s.t. like this: 1) Import["www.stephenwolfram.com","Hyperlinks"] 2) Graph[Flatten[Rest[NestList[Union[Flatten[Thread[#->,Import[#,"Hyperlinks"]]&/@Last/@ #]]&,{""-]>"www.stephenwolfram.com"},2]]]] I think I have the syntax right from RUclips, but I keep getting: Syntax::sntxf: "Thread[#->" cannot be followed by ",Import[#,Hyperlinks]]". Right now I am using Wolfram on a Raspberry Pi, and I just wanted to know if one needs to have some different access level to Mathematica to resolve this? I appreciate you might be busy and it's all right if you can't reply, Michael Cook m06orama@gmail.com
The Raspberry Pi doesn't even have an OS unless you give it one. What do you mean it's free on Raspberry Pi? Is Wolfram desktop linux bundled with Raspbian?
I wouldn't call changing a second order ODE to a first order system of ODEs 'contorting the way you think about the problem' and 'very different than how students see things in their math courses'. In fact, there is much physical insight to be gained by re-writing it this way. I think it obscures what is otherwise a very valid point regarding (1) using the right tool for the right job and (2) that there is a trade-off between user friendliness and how much control you have over what is under the hood. Also, Matlab has gui tools like simulink and mupad, and it doesnt take much sophistication to write nice wrapper modules that abstract the problem. Finally: not everything is as easy as solving ODEs analytically. PDEs, optimization problems, stochastic problems,... they do not have nice, analytical solutions. Students should learn how to harness *both* the power of a general tool like Mathematica *and* a powerful numerical tool like Matlab.
The process of using Mathematica to solve real world problems is quite direct and intuitive.
I guess there are a lot of hard work behind this to hide the boring details of machine level.
can you help me to solve real world problem related to civil engineering
@@frankmlondiwa4621 no
@@ramnareshdara5664 xD
Crazy that this has existed for so long I'm only now finding out about it.
Thank you sir... As an engineer this software has already fascinated me... And am looking forward to do some real good work with mathematica as I continue pursuing my Masters in Robotics
Well done, sir. I first got familiar with Mathematica back in 1990 with Mathematica 2.0. I will soon have Mathematica 12.1. Everything I learned thirty years ago is still valid. This program is cumulative. To my mind, nothing is thrown out. As such it is a very big program and no one will ever use all its features. Also, since this was one of the most pirated programs out there for a while, Wolfram introduced a few years back the the "hobbyist" edition for those of us who aren't students or professionals. We just want to explore with this very capable program and not come up with the big bucks this program is deserving of. My only wish is that Wolfram would come out with a paper edition of the manual. It ceased being published with the fifth edition. It would be very expensive and a true mathematic encyclopedia
I am learning these tools to understand and study the Wolfram Physics Model !!!
I found this video very practical and helpful and am very grateful ! i wish I had this at college!!!
Here in Australia every kid should be taught this!! It is so good it feels like cheating!
I am watching everything you have made now!!!
Excellent presentation, many thanks! I am excited that Mathematica comes with the Raspberry Pi 3 Raspbian distribution.
I wish I could DSolve my real life problems too. Great presentation! :D
It is really awesome and very well explained. Thank you.
A powerful presentation for a powerful product which I’ve enjoyed since it first came out. The “steep learning curve” argument often made is offset by the powerful tools that just do the job and the documentation and executable example library.
I’m working with teachers to get Stephen and Conrad’s vision to young people. We have to do things differently than the 18th century.
Probably the most underrated language
For those who want to know how to get fully symbolic indices: \:2080 through \:2089 gives subscript 0 through subscript 9. Those act like any other character and Mathematica doesn’t treat them specially. So if you just want symbols with subscripts in their names - that’s how. Otherwise, - gives you “real” indices that define functions behind your back. Sometimes that’s desirable eg when using indicial notation.
I long for the day to experience teaching by a professor like the senor.
Another way of seeing it is by recognizing that engineering is all applied math, so having a solid mathematical processing environment can’t but help a lot :)
Very nice program!
Thanks for sharing an excellent description of it!
Blessings for future .
Just hat's off for those who are working so hard to bring this on this planet.
One day its going to become world's best interactive language.
Because of its very very much like ; the problem is given by teacher and i have just write give data and useful equation.
This language is like FUTURERASTIC of matlab,python,c++...
Can you please make some courses on coursera or edx on so all backgrounds of reserchive person get help .
Awesome👏✊👍
The plot one is the most useful for research and checking if the math works correctly.
I learnd about mathematica because I read about math on olfram and then they mentioned they mentioned it.
Sir kindly solve boundary value problems with more than 3 parameter in ode. For eg momentum and angular momentum equation..
19:40 - like for the programs list.
Sir, thanks for the much informative video. I want to know the more basic book on Mathematica which has the detail for plot in advance physics.
thanks
Do you happen have the source for the MATLAB toolbox list? Working on a business case for Mathematia and it would be helpful
What means expression x[t_] = % [[1,1,2]], at 15:45 ?
It gets the last result (that would in this case be x[t]->3/94...) and only shows the right hand side of the rule. The [[1,1]] gets the first element of the list and [[1,1,2]] gets the right hand side of the first element of the list.
And the "%" is always the last computated result....
How to calculate curve's involutes in Mathematica Wolfram?
Hello good evening, I am trying to solve the following logarithm with wolfram mathematica but I can't get the program to give me a solution: Log2[X = 6] is 64 but I can't get the program to give me that solution, how do I do it as is the syntax that should i put??
What is the software you use ? Thank you. The problem is : everybody talks about wolfram language, BUT I don't know WHERE to find it...
Mathematica is the program, it is based on the Wolfram language
Convinced. **
Where is it free? I'm a self-teaching senior on low income and don't see it free anywhere.
A great program.
Thats pretty cool!!
what programming software to make mathematica? and what software did they use to create that programming software? just wondering, could someone solve this paradox? thx in advance
Mathematica is written in the Wolfram language. As you watch this video, the code that Jason is using is Wolfram language. Software developers at Wolfram research use the Wolfram language to program new functions (e.g., the new functionality in the upgrade from version 10 to 11). This is the reason that Mathematica can have such impressive new powerful features because the programers use the same function stack as a normal user. In other words, it is not python or C#.
I asked Wolfram and they told me there is a lot of "c" so what I say below is not exactly true
Mathematica和Matlab的图标其实在互别苗头啊。一个是离散的高度对称刺球象征符号处理，一个是光滑曲面象征解PDE。
Sir can you explain RK method in mathematics.
thanks
Doesn't Matlab also have a symbolic solve function?
Don't get me wrong, I liked the video; but I don't think the example was that impactful.
It's atrocious
Can somebody tell me what is the meaning of the symbol % in mathematica
in general, it means to apply what you are doing to the last input
It is the last result calculated by the kernel.
In[1]: 2+2
Out[1]: 4
In[2]: %-1
Out[2]: 3
that last example with concert tickets was pretty extra lol
awesome
They're obviously not making publicity to an apple product.
Man that was cool!
Please enable /Subtitles/Transcript/Communtity Translations/ K, Thx
Also you are a tad bit to selly, I'm already sold on the product and don't want to hear about another inferior one all the time.. I came here to learn, not to change my mind..
just for more pation you need deep music whene you talk .
Justin Pearson,
Thanks for a great talk, your "An Introduction to Mathematica and the Wolfram Language for Engineers" on RUclips.
I am a newbie with this so it's not really an Engineering question.
I am fascinated by some of the examples you give: e.g. your "Petunias" table, and also the graph of a web site that went s.t. like this:
1) Import["www.stephenwolfram.com","Hyperlinks"]
2) Graph[Flatten[Rest[NestList[Union[Flatten[Thread[#->,Import[#,"Hyperlinks"]]&/@Last/@ #]]&,{""-]>"www.stephenwolfram.com"},2]]]]
I think I have the syntax right from RUclips, but I keep getting:
Syntax::sntxf: "Thread[#->" cannot be followed by ",Import[#,Hyperlinks]]".
Right now I am using Wolfram on a Raspberry Pi, and I just wanted to know if one needs to have some different access level to Mathematica to resolve this?
I appreciate you might be busy and it's all right if you can't reply,
Michael Cook
m06orama@gmail.com
Didn’t it come out in the 90s?
Pretty sure it was the 90s
Just found a video about version 1.0 from 1989.
www.wolfram.com/broadcast/video.php?sx=&p=63&v=741
Sir how to create a list of even number, prime and composite numbers in three different ways
Sorry, Justin - I addressed my question to the wrong person - please ignore my email.
I got a new raspberry pi to try this thing out...
Useful but it still only gives you the answer. It doesn't show you how to get the answer.
Its free on raspberry pi!
The Raspberry Pi doesn't even have an OS unless you give it one. What do you mean it's free on Raspberry Pi? Is Wolfram desktop linux bundled with Raspbian?
I wouldn't call changing a second order ODE to a first order system of ODEs 'contorting the way you think about the problem' and 'very different than how students see things in their math courses'. In fact, there is much physical insight to be gained by re-writing it this way.
I think it obscures what is otherwise a very valid point regarding (1) using the right tool for the right job and (2) that there is a trade-off between user friendliness and how much control you have over what is under the hood.
Also, Matlab has gui tools like simulink and mupad, and it doesnt take much sophistication to write nice wrapper modules that abstract the problem.
Finally: not everything is as easy as solving ODEs analytically. PDEs, optimization problems, stochastic problems,... they do not have nice, analytical solutions. Students should learn how to harness *both* the power of a general tool like Mathematica *and* a powerful numerical tool like Matlab.
Just use Sagemath, it is open-source and free.
eh I tried that one first... if they just fixed the clunkyness of that
It’s tending towards unbridled rage
wolfram is the best
Rage comics in the year 2016 JHC
sin(x)=x
period
i am from bangladesh
this guy 100% doesn't dress like this on the daily
hahahah add Java and C++ to the list 🤣
and that is why you fail. like the president can't concentrate on stuff.