General Electric CEO: "This NEW Engine Will Destroy The Entire Aviation Industry!"
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 апр 2024
- Over the past decade, both Boeing and Airbus have upgraded the engines on their 737 and A320 families. The new engines they've put in are around 14 to 15% more efficient compared to the older ones. However, the new CFM Rise engine is expected to surpass this improvement by a significant margin.
✈️ Don't forget to LIKE and SUBSCRIBE for more aviation content! ✈️
Tags: cfm rise engine how it works,aviation,cfm rise engine sound,cfm rise engine,rolls royce engine,airplane engine,aeroadventures,general electrics,boeing,rise,safran,turboprop technology,truboprop,aviation industry,Airbus,Aviation explained,airbus,airbus a380,airbus news,cfm rise,aviation news,new aircraft engines,boeing news,boeing news today,airbus news today,turboprop engine,rise engine technology,cfm international rise,general electric,ge aviation
The wingtips of the propellors are a leaky airflow, wasting energy and fuel. The dual counter-rotating propellor-pairs are noisy because air is compressed and released. It's as if the engine is "clapping it hands" as propellor tips converge with each other. Ice buildup on the Props was also an issue!
There’s a reason these jets were never used…noise. In the 80s theses engines tested on the outer limits of stage 3 noise levels and today we are at stage 5 which is something like nearly 20 dB lower. Also, counter rotating props are a horrible idea for maintenance and longevity-too many moving parts in opposite directions and hence only the Russians employ that technique today. Plus, moving your blade to the outside on the endings where you cannot contain them in the advent of a failure or FOD hit, goes in counter to the last 30 years of standards and policy making for “contained blade separation”. Just ain’t gonna happen.
This video has so many aircraft identification errors it’s almost comical. Apparently the creator doesn’t have a firm grasp on the differences between the 727 and 737. Clearly the script is being generated by a computer voice but for crying out loud, double check your information for accuracy before you upload it to RUclips
Blocked for "destroy the entire" and the fake audience. It's getting old.
How this would destroy the insdustry? Click bIt much
This only makes sense on airfreighters.. These engines are only more efficient at slower speeds, lower altitudes and people don't want to see those blades, as they represent a real visual threat (real or not), so they need to target the retrofit market. Airfreight also is not as severely constrained by time slot performance (thus can avoid weather conditions that may be a constraint) or have the huger passenger liabilities. Passenger traffic is very fickle to economic conditions and there is a great concern of this turning negative in the near future, while airfreight is less elastic. I'm laughing at the hydrogen 'wokeness'.. it will never happen in large aircraft, perhaps a few 'woke' propeller small trainers (that only have to be able to fly for two hours at the most) due to cost, ground facilities and weight.
Hyperbole much?
What new engine? IT is the same as the Tupolev - TU95. So, NEW WHERE? WHAT A JOKE.
Then they unbalance the aircraft and it bites the dust, thanks Boeing
So basically they are inventing turboprop again.
As an aerospace contractor, for over 10 years, I'll believe it when I see it flying!
Been hearing this for four decades...
Back through the decades Popular Mechanics magazine kept predicting the return of the turbo prop. And jet engine companies kept making the front fan bigger and said "good enough"
If GE CEO really said "This NEW engine will destroy the entire aviation industry" then who does he think GE is going to sell this engine to?
I've been with Boeing for 20 years now and I could tell you it's safe to say after we outsource cut some costs and use some super glue. These things won't work like they're intended to.
It is of the most importance the PR people think of a fancy name for the new engines. This new duct fan or high by pass turbo fan is just a glorified turbo prop , and the industry spent lots of time and money telling the public the jets are superior to props and props are a step backwards. They managed to hide the fact from the ignorant public the jets are still struggling with the "sound barrier" for 3/4 century. Jets nowadays are no faster than those in the 1960s. The avionics and manors at the coffin's corner improved a lot.
This has been around for 40 years. It pops up every 10 years or so.
"no more turbofans"
its an old design that was never adopted decades ago.& will never be adopted now either.
Vortexes peeling off the rotating blades make a noise, a lot of noise. I won’t hold my breath on this one. The open blades will be hard on tall baggage handlers.