Cunobelinos was Iesus, accord. to Edmund Marriage or he was t. brother of Beli, according to Alan his book "Charter of the Kings." Hesus is probably Hu Gadarn. The Dobunni tribe had coins with the name EISU on them! Eisu - Iesin - Iesse - Hesus - Iesus.
Hello from South Germany Arviragus wasn´t Arthur and the land grant by King Arthur II - Athrwys ap Meurig took place in Ogmore in the 6th century. You are confusing something. Joseph lived in the 1st century and Arthur ap Meurig in the 6th century. Arviragus was either Caradoc or his brother. He also lived in the 1st century. Arthur I was Andragativs, he lived during the fourth century and he was commander in chief of Magnus Maximus´ army. He is buried at Atherstone. You´re really confusing Wilson´s books. Sorry.
Thanks for your contribution, Monika. I welcome alternative ideas and polite debate. Your take on this differs from, R w Morgan's genealogy we used in the video. I read Artorius Rex over twenty years ago and I intend to read the books of Wilson/Blackett next year, but most of the information that I used for this episode was taken from an article given to the National CV by W/B. I'm very much a student of this history and the idea of the stream is to share my journey as I plough through it, so I'm looking forward to your future contributions!
celtic christianity was well established in britain and ireland long before catholiscim . we know this other wise they wouldn't have been the need the for the synod of whitby in the 7th century . i'm of the subjective opinion that when st patrick drove the snakes out of ireland that it was allegorical for driving the early celtic church out ?
@PaulSmith-esotericexplorer i believe paul that one of the fundamental differences between celtic Christianity and catholicism was a person didn't need a mediator between him/her self nor was they any need for a physical church parse the universe being the church and the kingdom of god being within as above so below as within so without ? . and god obviously this wouldn't do in a malevolent heretical elitist system that controlled through a cult and fear etc. on a tangent i believe this is also a very similar reason why early rosicrucians didn''t agree with freemasonry as rosicrucianism in its purity was all about openness and sharing knowledge in the light without a lodge or degrees that way it couldn't be perverted or subverted as nobody knew who was and wasn't a rosicrucian and they was no dedicated physical building meeting place that they used to be infiltrated , a lot of early rosicrucian knowledge was shared in taverns and the like. ? not to be with the rosicrucians of today ?
Thank you, too, John and Paul! 😊😇
Watching the replay now Paul!
Ralph Ellis is a treasure!❤
New interview with Joseph Farrell on Lost Battlefields with Tino Struckman on World War II I think you will enjoy. It also has a Part 1.
Cunobelinos was Iesus, accord. to Edmund Marriage or he was t. brother of Beli, according to Alan his book "Charter of the Kings." Hesus is probably Hu Gadarn. The Dobunni tribe had coins with the name EISU on them! Eisu - Iesin - Iesse - Hesus - Iesus.
Beli Mawr was High King of Britain and King of Gwynedd.
Hello from South Germany Arviragus wasn´t Arthur and the land grant by King Arthur II - Athrwys ap Meurig took place in Ogmore in the 6th century.
You are confusing something. Joseph lived in the 1st century and Arthur ap Meurig in the 6th century. Arviragus was either Caradoc or his brother. He also lived in the 1st century.
Arthur I was Andragativs, he lived during the fourth century and he was commander in chief of Magnus Maximus´ army. He is buried at Atherstone. You´re really confusing Wilson´s books. Sorry.
Thanks for your contribution, Monika. I welcome alternative ideas and polite debate. Your take on this differs from, R w Morgan's genealogy we used in the video. I read Artorius Rex over twenty years ago and I intend to read the books of Wilson/Blackett next year, but most of the information that I used for this episode was taken from an article given to the National CV by W/B. I'm very much a student of this history and the idea of the stream is to share my journey as I plough through it, so I'm looking forward to your future contributions!
celtic christianity was well established in britain and ireland long before catholiscim . we know this other wise they wouldn't have been the need the for the synod of whitby in the 7th century . i'm of the subjective opinion that when st patrick drove the snakes out of ireland that it was allegorical for driving the early celtic church out ?
You could well be right, wichywoo. I'll try to remember to mention that to John when he's next on.
@PaulSmith-esotericexplorer i believe paul that one of the fundamental differences between celtic Christianity and catholicism was a person didn't need a mediator between him/her self nor was they any need for a physical church parse the universe being the church and the kingdom of god being within as above so below as within so without ? . and god obviously this wouldn't do in a malevolent heretical elitist system that controlled through a cult and fear etc.
on a tangent i believe this is also a very similar reason why early rosicrucians didn''t agree with freemasonry as rosicrucianism in its purity was all about openness and sharing knowledge in the light without a lodge or degrees that way it couldn't be perverted or subverted as nobody knew who was and wasn't a rosicrucian and they was no dedicated physical building meeting place that they used to be infiltrated , a lot of early rosicrucian knowledge was shared in taverns and the like. ? not to be with the rosicrucians of today ?