Thank you Ms. Karen Davila for inviting Retired Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio in your program this morning. He is expert in this subject of the WPS. God bless you both..
I believe, one of the problems we have is, there are too many personnel speaking and explaining regarding WPS. Our government should have a mechanism that only one department/authorized person to explain and speak regarding WPS.
Wasn't UNCLOS clear that China should not be present within the Philippine EEZ? They shouldn't have been there in the first place. Period. Their presence there was an act of lawlessness, transgression of international law, and defiance of the rules-based global order. Secondly, it is within the rights of the Philippines to do whatever it wants within its EEZ, as long as it doesn't violate international law as stipulated by UNCLOS.
i think unclos was very clear on the disputes, that ph has exclusive rights within ph eez ( means natural resources such as fishing, extracting of oil ) but it doesnt restrict anyone to stay there. it also recommends that both parties should end the disputes bilateraly. lastly if an armed conflict will erupt, that it will no longer have jurisdiction as these matters are outside their scope. sadly ruling is non binding so its up to parties involve to adhere or neglect the decision
@@kEnzmacoolet The Permanent Court of Arbitration’s 479-page ruling14 was overwhelmingly favorable to the Philippines’ position, ruling several elements of China’s claims in the South China Sea unlawful. Key findings of the ruling include: China’s claims to historic rights and resources within its nine-dash line have no legal basis. None of China’s claimed land features in the Spratly Islands are an island capable of generating a 200-nm exclusive economic zone. China violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights by interfering with Philippine oil exploration activities, prohibiting Philippine fishing vessels from operating, failing to prevent Chinese fishing vessels from operating, and conducting land reclamation in areas where the Philippines enjoys sovereign rights to explore for and exploit natural resources. China violated its marine environmental protection obligations under UNCLOS by causing “severe harm to the coral reef environment” with its land reclamation activities and harvesting of endangered species. China is legally bound by the tribunal’s ruling by virtue of its ratification of UNCLOS. The extent to which, and how, the tribunal’s ruling might be enforced is an open question, however; the Philippines and others may be able to pursue a range of legal options to punish China should it fail to abide by the ruling, or open negotiations to resolve the matter. If the ruling fails to alter China’s behavior in the longer term, it would send a signal to the rest of the world that adherence to international law is optional. This would degrade the viability of international maritime law as a tool to ensure the peaceful, stable, and lawful use of the seas.
@@c0smicbyte okee i stand corrected, but big butt😳 if we follow ur line of argument that parties are legally binded 'by virtue of ratification', why u.n resolutions can be non binding given we ratified on u.n convention aswell?
@@c0smicbyte Do you know the difference between arbitration and trial? Arbitration will only be effective when both parties agree. You have sent a bunch of things, but China has not agreed to participate in the arbitration at all, so these have no legal effect at all. Of course, China does not need to recognize it.
@@kEnzmacoolet Do you know the difference between arbitration and trial? Arbitration will only be effective when both parties agree. You have sent a bunch of things, but China has not agreed to participate in the arbitration at all, so these have no legal effect at all. Of course, China does not need to recognize it.
YAN KASI ANG HIRAP SA PRESIDENTENG ANG LAYUNIN LAMANG AY " TO STAY IN POWER " AND " TO ENRICH THEMSELVES " TULAD NI ARROYO AT DUTERTE , KAYA LAGING NAU-UTAKAN NG KALABAN ! ! !
Noong election si Justice Carpio ay kritiko ni BBM dahil estate tax, mga nakaw at kung anu pa in short ayaw nya sa Marcos. Bat ngayon hindi nya binabangit ang mga yun?
What’s the purpose of having alliance with the US if they can’t help us? Truly Philippines can’t stand with china in defending the west PH sea, so sad to admit but we need the US to settle down this issue.
Thank you Ms. Karen Davila for inviting Retired Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio in your program this morning. He is expert in this subject of the WPS. God bless you both..
Pilipinas huwag matakot. Tayo na ng outpost jan. Protect Reed bank. It's for the Philippines and the next generation of Filipinos.
ARROYO AND DUTERTE SHOULD BE PUT IN CHAINS! WHY ARE THEY STILL ALLOWED TO WALK FREE?
Justice Carpio, the lesson is not to put TRAITORS in Malacanang.
totoo yan
❤Justice Carpio
We need a person like FJ Carpio in our country please sir run for office in our government next election 😢 at least for senator.
Dapat magkaroon na ng chairman sa wps para kung maibenta ang wps islands , bigtihin na Lang ang chairman
Thank you
God bless you. Sir: Justice Antonio Carpio..
Yes, China doesn’t have any right to know what Filipinos want to do in their Own territory
Davila you are like trillanes
tagal naman umaksyon. dba dato pa sabi na mag lagay ng structure? hanggan ngayon wala pa ? ma occupy na yan
Pwede po ba lagyan ng barrier lahat ng sakop ng pilipinas
Eto justice na kulang sa pansin
junior will be too scared to order the construction of any outpost or station or gas exploration in our EZZ. he is all talk but lame in action 🇵🇭
I love all the president in this. Country
I believe, one of the problems we have is, there are too many personnel speaking and explaining regarding WPS. Our government should have a mechanism that only one department/authorized person to explain and speak regarding WPS.
How does a country rejoin the ICC?
I pray President Bongbong Marcos could think about this...
God bless SC carpio
Yayaman na ang mga pilipino
😮😮😮dapat ng mag file ng panibagong case sa UN...
Yes😊
CN not compliant to unclos and coc by building bases in PH eez
Mamahalin ng halos karamihan. Kahit hindi pilipino ang magpapahalaga sa. Pag angat ng buhay ng mga tao
Dapat😊
Wasn't UNCLOS clear that China should not be present within the Philippine EEZ? They shouldn't have been there in the first place. Period. Their presence there was an act of lawlessness, transgression of international law, and defiance of the rules-based global order. Secondly, it is within the rights of the Philippines to do whatever it wants within its EEZ, as long as it doesn't violate international law as stipulated by UNCLOS.
i think unclos was very clear on the disputes, that ph has exclusive rights within ph eez ( means natural resources such as fishing, extracting of oil ) but it doesnt restrict anyone to stay there. it also recommends that both parties should end the disputes bilateraly. lastly if an armed conflict will erupt, that it will no longer have jurisdiction as these matters are outside their scope. sadly ruling is non binding so its up to parties involve to adhere or neglect the decision
@@kEnzmacoolet The Permanent Court of Arbitration’s 479-page ruling14 was overwhelmingly favorable to the Philippines’ position, ruling several elements of China’s claims in the South China Sea unlawful. Key findings of the ruling include:
China’s claims to historic rights and resources within its nine-dash line have no legal basis.
None of China’s claimed land features in the Spratly Islands are an island capable of generating a 200-nm exclusive economic zone.
China violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights by interfering with Philippine oil exploration activities, prohibiting Philippine fishing vessels from operating, failing to prevent Chinese fishing vessels from operating, and conducting land reclamation in areas where the Philippines enjoys sovereign rights to explore for and exploit natural resources.
China violated its marine environmental protection obligations under UNCLOS by causing “severe harm to the coral reef environment” with its land reclamation activities and harvesting of endangered species.
China is legally bound by the tribunal’s ruling by virtue of its ratification of UNCLOS. The extent to which, and how, the tribunal’s ruling might be enforced is an open question, however; the Philippines and others may be able to pursue a range of legal options to punish China should it fail to abide by the ruling, or open negotiations to resolve the matter.
If the ruling fails to alter China’s behavior in the longer term, it would send a signal to the rest of the world that adherence to international law is optional. This would degrade the viability of international maritime law as a tool to ensure the peaceful, stable, and lawful use of the seas.
@@c0smicbyte okee i stand corrected, but big butt😳 if we follow ur line of argument that parties are legally binded 'by virtue of ratification', why u.n resolutions can be non binding given we ratified on u.n convention aswell?
@@c0smicbyte Do you know the difference between arbitration and trial? Arbitration will only be effective when both parties agree. You have sent a bunch of things, but China has not agreed to participate in the arbitration at all, so these have no legal effect at all. Of course, China does not need to recognize it.
@@kEnzmacoolet Do you know the difference between arbitration and trial? Arbitration will only be effective when both parties agree. You have sent a bunch of things, but China has not agreed to participate in the arbitration at all, so these have no legal effect at all. Of course, China does not need to recognize it.
CN doing copycat of PH style vs CN while it sits in PH eez w military bases
Sir Antonio Carpio for senator let support
YAN KASI ANG HIRAP SA PRESIDENTENG ANG LAYUNIN LAMANG AY " TO STAY IN POWER " AND " TO ENRICH THEMSELVES " TULAD NI ARROYO AT DUTERTE , KAYA LAGING NAU-UTAKAN NG KALABAN ! ! !
Noong election si Justice Carpio ay kritiko ni BBM dahil estate tax, mga nakaw at kung anu pa in short ayaw nya sa Marcos. Bat ngayon hindi nya binabangit ang mga yun?
What’s the purpose of having alliance with the US if they can’t help us? Truly Philippines can’t stand with china in defending the west PH sea, so sad to admit but we need the US to settle down this issue.
Expert 😂😂😂😂😂
This Carpio is a monotonous and annoying to listen.
Tumahimik carport girl