Moral progress is a product of an active faith in Jesus but many miss the point that Jesus didn’t come to make bad people good, but to bring spiritually dead people to life
It's both not either or as demonstrated by Christians that have changed from evil to good ( i.e. The writer of Amazing Grace). [Captain of A Slave ship to Pastor ]
@@davidjanbaz7728 yeah I agree, it wasn’t meant as an either statement…as a disciple of Christ, morality is assumed…but to our atheist friends out there who believe they can be “good” with out GOD, no amount of “good” can bring them to life…Peter nails it in John 6:68
Exactly, there is an assumption that religion is about morality, and a tool to make people moral. But Jesus identifies the primary problem as our estrangement from God.
Incremental progress absolutely makes sense. Just look at the right way to address an addict's hardcore drug addiction. You don't shackle them up & forcefully make them go cold turkey. In a lot of cases, that can be regressive & potentially deadly.
Christianity made an important contribution in western philosophy in that the church taught the value of the human soul. It’s very difficult to think of others as objects or tools to be used when everyone has intrinsic value.
Look at what's happening around us. Some people think that shouting, canceling or humiliating people will make people act the way the want them to, but it doesn't work that way. God had to lovingly change people's hearts over time.
It's true that certain laws were in the pentateuch because of the hardness of men's hearts, and that the law was a schoolmaster until Christ appeared, but I feel like people often discredit the Law for not being up to our "perfected" modern standards, and I think we have a lot more to learn from it than we realize.
People really don't take the time to study before positing a video. That's what's wrong with social media. God Bless you IP and keep on defending the faith! I have recently engaged in apologetics as well, as we need more apologist that have a good heart for people like you and others! Ave Christus Rex!
Is it just me, or do all the countries that tend to be the most Christian (like North American and Europe) also tend to have the best ratings by international sources when it comes to human rights? Meanwhile, Islamic countries (like Saudi Arabia) and atheist countries (like China and North Korea) tend to have the most consistently abysmal human rights ratings, don't they?
@@Hello-bi1pm Ok, correction: Many European countries are majority Lutherian. But my point still stands. Do some research on the actual demographics of the countries before you start running your effing pie-hole.
Yes, it was. Even take a human from another country like South Sudan in today's world, and you will see that their values and ways of thinking would be different, although the internet is changing that slowly
What she's doing is very common-curating the information. Making sure we only talk about a tiny section of the whole in order to make a group you don't like look as bad as possible.
Well said. If only the people I've been debating with on another video would actually see this. It's annoying that people can't grasp the concept that Christianity ended slavery, or the argumentative points I made on Leviticus 25 44-46. So thanks for fighting the good fight @InspiringPhilosophy
@@mattholt2451 all too true. Sadly, there are many Muslims in Africa who still practice slavery. But it is majority Christians who fight against this and try to stop it, both now and in the past
Matthew 13 31Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field: 32Which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof.
Whenever someone talks about slavery in Christianity, mention the Byzantine Empire. Owning slaves was seen as a social faux pas and prevented you from being baptised in the chucrh.
So does Christianity, if you look at extremists and ignore reasonable and inspired persons. You notice no one defines feminist, in arguments about it. That way you can argue it any way you want, whichever side you are on, no matter how abusive you are, of either sex.
I want to see her go back in time to when anyone not in your tribe was not considered human, and see her try to impose her squeaky clean morality on them.
Ive got a question totally off topic. Is the book of Job really the oldest book in the Bible. I was reading it is because no sign of the law of Moses was mentioned, no priesthood and he would do the sacrifice himself. Does IP have a video explaining this? Thanks beforehand
IP does have a video on Job, but it's more an exegesis of the book than a video about its place in history. It might have some information in there though.
It is also worth noting that, while HAVING a slave was accepted in the Bible as a part of the world, putting someone INTO slavery is always portrayed as an evil deed.
Lev 25:44 (KJV) “Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.” Sounds like god commanding them to take slaves not an evil deed.
@@goodknightcarolina He commanded the Israelites to slay the pregnant women of the Amalekites, rip open their bellies and take out the babies and dash their heads against the rocks. This was in retribution for the Amalekites having done this same thing to the Israelites as they were passing through on their way from Egypt to Canaan. You can't just take something like slavery, pick one example from the Bible and say it's always the right thing. Slavery is different things in different cultures. In ancient Israel it tended to be an employment contract.
@@goodknightcarolina no, he's saying if you're going to obtain bondmen, you shall not subject those that believe in him to it because it's a foul thing, and he's protecting his people from it.
✝️👑❤️🙏🏻 Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen. Hallelujah.
Why doesn't YHWH take an incremental approach to idolatry? Why is he able to command that when the Israelites were not able to follow but he can't command do not own another person as property?
allowing them to worship another “god” and look to that for answers instead of YHWH would do them more harm then good. God took them from slaves to free, and in the same way took me from slave to free today. of course they were physically slaves, and i was only spiritually but, no idol would ever do that. also it didn’t matter if He commanded it or not, they had already built a golden calf before moses had gotten down the mountains with the Commandments.
Be careful using the term "Humanism" there. Some people give it a Secular bent in definition. Basically attempting to say that Equality can be derived from Naturalistic sources... Ignoring both God & obvious/objective Natural world reality.
This is the same utilitarian bull crap that WLC just got roasted for in his last interview with Alex O'Connor. God can do or command whatever he wants to bring about his goal.
Nope. The Bible clearly says that the Israelites can buy humans from the nations around them, and those humans are to be enslaved permanently, can be passed down through the generations, and their children are also to be enslaved. Lev. 25:44-46
@@lizh1988 it was different in different times and circumstances. But at no time was chattel slavery banned or forbidden. It was more like indentured servitude when talking about debt slavery of their fellow Israelites. But owning a non-Israelite was always permissible and was nothing like indentured servitude.
Most people see the word "slave" and are no longer interested in context. Nevermind that Exodus punishes the taking of slaves with death and details ways that a man voluntarily enters slavery for a period of years as an alternative to ruin and starvation.
@Ryvaken I'm sure the confusion also comes because a bit because the Hebrew word for servant and the Hebrew word for slave are the same and like you said most don't bother to look at context.
WHICH QURAN IS TRUE? Because i'll say the Quran have more New update then the bible 1. The Varsha Quran 2. Hafs Quran 3. Qulun Quran 4. Al Bazzi Quran 5. Qunbul Quran 6. Al Duri Quran 7. Al Suri Quran 8. Hisam Quran 9. Ibn Dhakwan Quran 10. Khalaf Quran 11. Khallad Quran 12. Abdul Harith Quran 13. Ibn Wardan Quran 14. Ibn Ayyash Qurah 15. Ibn Jamaz Quran 16. Ruwas Quran 17. Rawh Quran 18. Ishaq Quran 19. Idris al Hadded Quran 20. Biringham Quran 21. Saana Mosque Quran 22. Saana Mosque Quran (2nd) 23. Quran of Uthman 24. The Famous Blue Quran 25. The Quran-Assad New Standard Version (2017) 26. Quran, the Final Testament by Rashid Kalifa HOW MANY QURAN VERSIONS DOES IT TAKE TO PROVE THE QURAN TO BE A FALSE BOOK?
Evolutionists believe in evolution until God uses time to evolve human morality. Then He’s wrong - the nerve to wait for humanity to ethically mature! Well now He’s waiting for spiritual maturity. But people want spirituality without accountability. That’s not how the force works.
@@marissajones1840 but did Paul have Jesus or the Father in mind when he wrote that verse because in the previous verses Jesus is mentioned several times.
@@nothingnothing7958 he had God, throughout the new testament you see the distinction made the Father or Christ or the holy spirit the writer always distinguishes between who he's talking about so the only logical conclusion is he's talking about God as a whole.
Its not even debatable as Christ explained it clearly saying that moses gave them a commandment because of their hardness of heart. If one commandment was a compromise we should not assume the others were any different especially considering that they dont measure up to the ten commandments which God showed to be eternal by writing them with his own hand on stone compared to the law which was written by moses on paper.
@@goodknightcarolina In regards to Jesus's statement it shows that the mosaic laws were imperfect and not meant to last forever, because if one is imperfect you cannot assume the others are perfect nor should you considering that they do not match up to the ten commandments. After all, what does slavery have to do with loving your neighbor as yourself? In regards to Paul's statement about honoring a cruel master his point was that Christians should demonstrate that they are above the trials of life, having the hope of heaven regardless of how anyone may treat them. Jesus commanded to rejoice in trials because your reward is great in heaven and Paul's instruction agrees. But in regards to Christian slave owners Paul warned them to treat their slaves well, knowing that they both have the same master, Christ. Yes, God always intended that Christians like Wilberforce should lead the charge against slavery but to be a slave does not prevent one from being saved and God chose the right time to motivate his servants against slavery when he knew it would do the most good. Slavery is evil but it is nothing compared to eternal death and God's instructions on slavery in the bible are based on this fact.
@@christianknickerbocker604 great. So can we progress beyond the regressive sexual laws and gender roles proscribed by mosaic law as well? “Neither male nor female, slave nor free?”
Besides the explicit instance of moral accommodation (divorce), I don't think we can say God gave the Jewish people a morally flawed law. He's the one that defines goodness, not us, so we shouldn't grant opponents their claims that other parts of the Law given to Moses are evil.
This reasoning doesn't work, though. Read Numbers 31. Yahweh commands genocide and sex trafficking. This isn't a compromise with a fallen people. This is a monster.
Why do you say that? Do you feel the need to subtly attack the islamic religion for her stance? The bible been not been necesarilly changed. But reinterpreted thousands of ways, especially from a rocky start as the history of early christianity suggest. And so much so that it could not identify with judaism anymore and branched out as its own religion yet still uses the same canon of books the jews originally used.
@edwinasencio5727 it hasn't been reinterpreted its been translated any changes are minimal translation items, of course it's going to branch away from judism the law has been fulfilled so the story continues.
@@marissajones1840 the fact that many denominations of christianity exist (more so than any other religion) based on interpretations of text like example Catholic and Protestant is proof that your claim has no bearing on historical facts. Your statement of translations is a non sequitor, they can be perfectly translated (they arent but thats not my point) and people can still interpret them in their own ways.
@@edwinasencio5727 because I was saying this 👇 Me: WHICH QURAN IS TRUE? Because i'll say the Quran have more New update then the bible 1. The Varsha Quran 2. Hafs Quran 3. Qulun Quran 4. Al Bazzi Quran 5. Qunbul Quran 6. Al Duri Quran 7. Al Suri Quran 8. Hisam Quran 9. Ibn Dhakwan Quran 10. Khalaf Quran 11. Khallad Quran 12. Abdul Harith Quran 13. Ibn Wardan Quran 14. Ibn Ayyash Qurah 15. Ibn Jamaz Quran 16. Ruwas Quran 17. Rawh Quran 18. Ishaq Quran 19. Idris al Hadded Quran 20. Biringham Quran 21. Saana Mosque Quran 22. Saana Mosque Quran (2nd) 23. Quran of Uthman 24. The Famous Blue Quran 25. The Quran-Assad New Standard Version (2017) 26. Quran, the Final Testament by Rashid Kalifa HOW MANY QURAN VERSIONS DOES IT TAKE TO PROVE THE QURAN TO BE A FALSE Book? Lol
@@edwinasencio5727 how someone interprets the text is not relevant to what you are claiming, the different denominations are for your irrelevant reason difference in interpretation of the text but if you look at the bibles they're reading you'll see they're all the same bibles outside of the catholic which is the same but also includes the apocrypha. Historically there have been rewrites and they're marked as forgeries such as the slavers bible, the Thomas Jefferson bible, and in recent days the chinese bible but those are distinguished as different and false, the different translations actually help paint a much clearer picture if you're genuine when reading and not trying to poke holes.
I agree that Christianity has been responsible for a lot of moral progress, and I love the book, "Dominion." But arguing that parts of the Bible represent "a compromise with a fallen people" is some VERY thin ice to be skating on, my friend.
God doesn’t give us challenges that we can’t handle. Asking humanity to abolish slavery overnight was something we couldn’t do just like that. We are fallen beings after all.
It’s not thin ice, it’s reality. When you compare the OT law with surrounding empires, it’s actually much fairer and moral. I recommend “Is God a Moral Monster” by Paul Copan
Matthew 19:8 He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. I dont think it's a stretch to say that since the Law of Moses comprised on divorce "because of your hardness of heart", that the Law of Moses was compromising in other areas as well.
@@reyis_here945 Do you know what we call it when we recognize that morality changes across time and culture? Moral relativism. Welcome to postmodernism. :)
@@HangrySaturn oh look at this its a coin🪙, I wonder what will happen if I fl... whoa... it land landed on "one side"... wow i wonder what would happen if I... whoa... would you look at that, "the exact same thing happened again" and again and again... you see where this is analogy is leading right
@@reyis_here945 I'm listening to a choir of dwarves singing in bass about rock and stone. So, no, I don't know where this analogy is leading -- but I'm sure you can enlighten me!
But in the Old Testament we see animal sacrifice used to represent the coming messiah? The ram caught in the bush is an example. We needed someone to live the perfect life that we cannot live. Therefore Christ had to die for our sins.
Just because you reject the sacrifice of Jesus doesn't undo what has been done, you are not the first nor the last to reject the sacrifice of Jesus the Pharisees, Romans (of that time) and the Sadducees did that while he died in front of them
Moral progress is a product of an active faith in Jesus but many miss the point that Jesus didn’t come to make bad people good, but to bring spiritually dead people to life
Well stated 👌🏽
He did say he was the way, as in he was the example for people to live by, so I’d say he was both.
It's both not either or as demonstrated by Christians that have changed from evil to good ( i.e. The writer of Amazing Grace).
[Captain of A Slave ship to Pastor ]
@@davidjanbaz7728 yeah I agree, it wasn’t meant as an either statement…as a disciple of Christ, morality is assumed…but to our atheist friends out there who believe they can be “good” with out GOD, no amount of “good” can bring them to life…Peter nails it in John 6:68
Exactly, there is an assumption that religion is about morality, and a tool to make people moral. But Jesus identifies the primary problem as our estrangement from God.
Damn bro even got Spider-Man on his side💀
😂
Incremental progress absolutely makes sense.
Just look at the right way to address an addict's hardcore drug addiction.
You don't shackle them up & forcefully make them go cold turkey.
In a lot of cases, that can be regressive & potentially deadly.
In general that's with benzodiapines & alcohol due to seizures... You surely heard of detox? So, it doesn't make sense.
@@CountMeOut33 detox is not an insta-cure either
@@CountMeOut33its a stepping stone... not the end of the path
So maybe we can do the same with homophobia and Gender issues, right? In Christ there’s neither slave nor free, *male nor female* right??
@@goodknightcarolina what does sex have to do with intercourse
Christianity made an important contribution in western philosophy in that the church taught the value of the human soul. It’s very difficult to think of others as objects or tools to be used when everyone has intrinsic value.
no it didnt
@@jj-yi1ne yes, it did, the concept of the soul is one of the most fundamental beliefs of Christianity.
The best, most 🤌 philosopher on RUclips
God is the greatest philosopher in the universe
@@nodiet8660 that better? 😂
@@BeingChristLike🤌🤌🤌mama
@@BeingChristLike He's better 😎
Look at what's happening around us. Some people think that shouting, canceling or humiliating people will make people act the way the want them to, but it doesn't work that way.
God had to lovingly change people's hearts over time.
It's true that certain laws were in the pentateuch because of the hardness of men's hearts, and that the law was a schoolmaster until Christ appeared, but I feel like people often discredit the Law for not being up to our "perfected" modern standards, and I think we have a lot more to learn from it than we realize.
the Laws in torah is in context of clan-based society
@@negativedawahilariousthat's eveery society
Take a drink every time IP mentions “dominion” by Tom Holland (Please don’t actually you will die)
Swear
It's a good book
@@darposdesign4479 oh I’m not disagreeing. But he references it so much it’s funny
I noticed that too!
True 😂
I never thought about it this way. Thanks Michael!
People seem to fail to realize the people in the bible were righteous not good. The stories all add up to why we needed Jesus to save us.
People really don't take the time to study before positing a video. That's what's wrong with social media. God Bless you IP and keep on defending the faith! I have recently engaged in apologetics as well, as we need more apologist that have a good heart for people like you and others! Ave Christus Rex!
People really think that you can force a change oof heart. Nott that I'm surprised, the movements nowadays operate exactly like that.
"The Christian god" 👎🚫
-THE God 🗿✝️
Is it just me, or do all the countries that tend to be the most Christian (like North American and Europe) also tend to have the best ratings by international sources when it comes to human rights? Meanwhile, Islamic countries (like Saudi Arabia) and atheist countries (like China and North Korea) tend to have the most consistently abysmal human rights ratings, don't they?
Europe is atheist, while Russia is Christian, so the opposite is true
@@Hello-bi1pm No, European countries are majority catholic.
@@Hello-bi1pm Ok, correction: Many European countries are majority Lutherian. But my point still stands.
Do some research on the actual demographics of the countries before you start running your effing pie-hole.
@@Acerthorn look up Netherlands religion stats
@@Hello-bi1pm Look up Switzerland, Finland, Norway, and Sweden religion stats.
God's plans are greater that we think
Remember kids, morality is objective, it just takes time for a "child" to become an "adult"
Are you telling me that being a human back 3000 years ago is very different from now 😮
Yes, it was. Even take a human from another country like South Sudan in today's world, and you will see that their values and ways of thinking would be different, although the internet is changing that slowly
The resources you have given me to research this topic over the years is awesome. Thank you IP
What she's doing is very common-curating the information. Making sure we only talk about a tiny section of the whole in order to make a group you don't like look as bad as possible.
Exactly!
"Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest." (Matthew 11:28)
Well said. If only the people I've been debating with on another video would actually see this. It's annoying that people can't grasp the concept that Christianity ended slavery, or the argumentative points I made on Leviticus 25 44-46. So thanks for fighting the good fight @InspiringPhilosophy
Christianity did not end slavery. The people who abolished slavery were Christians sure
@@mattholt2451 all too true. Sadly, there are many Muslims in Africa who still practice slavery. But it is majority Christians who fight against this and try to stop it, both now and in the past
Spiderman wrote dominion?
Case in point: The main women rights organization in the early 1900s was the women’s Christian temperance union, aka WCTU.
Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee; blessed art thou among women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus.
Matthew 13
31Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field: 32Which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof.
God is constant but He expects human morality to evolve.
Amen and Amen! ❤
Like Karl Marx said: communism begins where atheism begins.
Great response man
Amen❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉😊😊😊
Whenever someone talks about slavery in Christianity, mention the Byzantine Empire. Owning slaves was seen as a social faux pas and prevented you from being baptised in the chucrh.
OUTSTANDING
Feminism goes too far now 💀
So does Christianity, if you look at extremists and ignore reasonable and inspired persons. You notice no one defines feminist, in arguments about it. That way you can argue it any way you want, whichever side you are on, no matter how abusive you are, of either sex.
I’m running a homemade powerlifting split. Do you think 10 sets of deadlifts and 3 sets of pull-ups is enough back volume?
There's no reason YHWH's actions need to be justified. We're only supposing, and looking like fools doing it.
I want to see her go back in time to when anyone not in your tribe was not considered human, and see her try to impose her squeaky clean morality on them.
Ive got a question totally off topic. Is the book of Job really the oldest book in the Bible. I was reading it is because no sign of the law of Moses was mentioned, no priesthood and he would do the sacrifice himself. Does IP have a video explaining this? Thanks beforehand
IP does have a video on Job, but it's more an exegesis of the book than a video about its place in history. It might have some information in there though.
That's a solid sweater it looks good
This woman🤦♂️
It is also worth noting that, while HAVING a slave was accepted in the Bible as a part of the world, putting someone INTO slavery is always portrayed as an evil deed.
Lev 25:44 (KJV) “Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.” Sounds like god commanding them to take slaves not an evil deed.
@@goodknightcarolina He commanded the Israelites to slay the pregnant women of the Amalekites, rip open their bellies and take out the babies and dash their heads against the rocks.
This was in retribution for the Amalekites having done this same thing to the Israelites as they were passing through on their way from Egypt to Canaan.
You can't just take something like slavery, pick one example from the Bible and say it's always the right thing. Slavery is different things in different cultures. In ancient Israel it tended to be an employment contract.
@@goodknightcarolina no, he's saying if you're going to obtain bondmen, you shall not subject those that believe in him to it because it's a foul thing, and he's protecting his people from it.
How is she still loading those up😅
0:26 - 0:32
So does that mean that Leviticus 18:22 is also obsolete and no longer applicable?
No. Because it is reaffirmed in the New Testament by the apostles and Paul.
@@CmdrJay72 I wasn't talking to you, asshole.
"Jesus answered, 'I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.'" (John 14:6)
The bible reminds the Hebrews to remember their experience i. Eqypt and to not behave the same.
✝️👑❤️🙏🏻 Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen. Hallelujah.
I want to point out Tom Holland, author of Dominion, is an atheist
No way, is he?
*Edit: he is a Christian, I don't know if you were trying to make a joke, I am sorry my sense of humor isn't the best 😅
Why doesn't YHWH take an incremental approach to idolatry? Why is he able to command that when the Israelites were not able to follow but he can't command do not own another person as property?
allowing them to worship another “god” and look to that for answers instead of YHWH would do them more harm then good. God took them from slaves to free, and in the same way took me from slave to free today. of course they were physically slaves, and i was only spiritually but, no idol would ever do that. also it didn’t matter if He commanded it or not, they had already built a golden calf before moses had gotten down the mountains with the Commandments.
Amen
It makes perfect sense for humans changing over time. Not so much for an all powerful god with objective morality.
Be careful using the term "Humanism" there.
Some people give it a Secular bent in definition. Basically attempting to say that Equality can be derived from Naturalistic sources...
Ignoring both God & obvious/objective Natural world reality.
IF Lindsey Nohan.. don't stop
Amen. Under God we see humanity thrive. Choose the Lord to stay alive.
Jesus lives ♥️ and is God 🙏🏻 Christ ✝️ and King 👑
This is the same utilitarian bull crap that WLC just got roasted for in his last interview with Alex O'Connor. God can do or command whatever he wants to bring about his goal.
For the algorithm
Also the slavery then was bondsservents. Who sold themselves for a small time.
Nope. The Bible clearly says that the Israelites can buy humans from the nations around them, and those humans are to be enslaved permanently, can be passed down through the generations, and their children are also to be enslaved. Lev. 25:44-46
I think it was different for different times and circumstances. Slavery could be temporary, I'm fairly sure. More like indentured servitude.
@@lizh1988 it was different in different times and circumstances. But at no time was chattel slavery banned or forbidden. It was more like indentured servitude when talking about debt slavery of their fellow Israelites. But owning a non-Israelite was always permissible and was nothing like indentured servitude.
No it wasnt. Read Numbers 31. Yahweh commands the female virgins be taken as sex slaves. It was not their choice.
@@ryanrevland4333yeah, no. that was Moses. dont confuse descriptions, and prescriptions within the Bible.
Who is she? I think I wanna watch more of her.
Why lol
I dont understand there wasnt really a compromise slavery as in modern american level slaver was not allowed amongst Isreal
Most people see the word "slave" and are no longer interested in context. Nevermind that Exodus punishes the taking of slaves with death and details ways that a man voluntarily enters slavery for a period of years as an alternative to ruin and starvation.
@Ryvaken I'm sure the confusion also comes because a bit because the Hebrew word for servant and the Hebrew word for slave are the same and like you said most don't bother to look at context.
WHICH QURAN IS TRUE?
Because i'll say the Quran have more New update then the bible
1. The Varsha Quran
2. Hafs Quran
3. Qulun Quran
4. Al Bazzi Quran
5. Qunbul Quran
6. Al Duri Quran
7. Al Suri Quran
8. Hisam Quran
9. Ibn Dhakwan Quran
10. Khalaf Quran
11. Khallad Quran
12. Abdul Harith Quran
13. Ibn Wardan Quran
14. Ibn Ayyash Qurah
15. Ibn Jamaz Quran
16. Ruwas Quran
17. Rawh Quran
18. Ishaq Quran
19. Idris al Hadded Quran
20. Biringham Quran
21. Saana Mosque Quran
22. Saana Mosque Quran (2nd)
23. Quran of Uthman
24. The Famous Blue Quran
25. The Quran-Assad New Standard Version (2017)
26. Quran, the Final Testament by Rashid Kalifa
HOW MANY QURAN VERSIONS DOES IT TAKE TO PROVE THE QURAN TO BE A FALSE BOOK?
Evolutionists believe in evolution until God uses time to evolve human morality. Then He’s wrong - the nerve to wait for humanity to ethically mature! Well now He’s waiting for spiritual maturity. But people want spirituality without accountability. That’s not how the force works.
They still haven't is the whole problem
Hey guys is 1 Timothy 1:17 calling Jesus or the Father the " only God".
It's calling God the only God Jesus and the Farher included.
@@marissajones1840 but did Paul have Jesus or the Father in mind when he wrote that verse because in the previous verses Jesus is mentioned several times.
@@nothingnothing7958 he had God, throughout the new testament you see the distinction made the Father or Christ or the holy spirit the writer always distinguishes between who he's talking about so the only logical conclusion is he's talking about God as a whole.
Its not even debatable as Christ explained it clearly saying that moses gave them a commandment because of their hardness of heart. If one commandment was a compromise we should not assume the others were any different especially considering that they dont measure up to the ten commandments which God showed to be eternal by writing them with his own hand on stone compared to the law which was written by moses on paper.
He was talking about divorce. Why not mention slavery? Why did Paul tell slaves to obey their masters even if they’re cruel? It sounds very debatable
@@goodknightcarolina In regards to Jesus's statement it shows that the mosaic laws were imperfect and not meant to last forever, because if one is imperfect you cannot assume the others are perfect nor should you considering that they do not match up to the ten commandments. After all, what does slavery have to do with loving your neighbor as yourself?
In regards to Paul's statement about honoring a cruel master his point was that Christians should demonstrate that they are above the trials of life, having the hope of heaven regardless of how anyone may treat them. Jesus commanded to rejoice in trials because your reward is great in heaven and Paul's instruction agrees. But in regards to Christian slave owners Paul warned them to treat their slaves well, knowing that they both have the same master, Christ. Yes, God always intended that Christians like Wilberforce should lead the charge against slavery but to be a slave does not prevent one from being saved and God chose the right time to motivate his servants against slavery when he knew it would do the most good. Slavery is evil but it is nothing compared to eternal death and God's instructions on slavery in the bible are based on this fact.
@@christianknickerbocker604 great. So can we progress beyond the regressive sexual laws and gender roles proscribed by mosaic law as well? “Neither male nor female, slave nor free?”
@@goodknightcarolina Based on what evidence do you call them regressive?
@@christianknickerbocker604 because they don’t have anything to do with loving your neighbor
There is this dude I am talking to who says that Christianity is inspired by paganism? Give me feedback so I can answer him best.
Ask for historical context and compare it to actually historical sources
What is he saying? "Paganism" is a very broad brush.
@@reyis_here945 Thanks
@@BongBing11 I don’t even think he elaborated. I’m assuming near Eastern and Eastern paganism.
Please, a compromise, God needs to compromise his own progress resulting in humans owning other humans?
Bro I love you so much! Haha
Besides the explicit instance of moral accommodation (divorce), I don't think we can say God gave the Jewish people a morally flawed law. He's the one that defines goodness, not us, so we shouldn't grant opponents their claims that other parts of the Law given to Moses are evil.
This reasoning doesn't work, though. Read Numbers 31. Yahweh commands genocide and sex trafficking. This isn't a compromise with a fallen people. This is a monster.
✝️👑🙏🏻❤️ JESUS CHRIST IS COMING SOON. REPENT AND BELIEVE IN THE GOSPEL. JESUS CHRIST LOVES YOU WITH AN EVERLASTING LOVE.
😅 I think that girl was a Muslim I think she was saying the Bible has been changed
Sorry for my mistake argument
Why do you say that? Do you feel the need to subtly attack the islamic religion for her stance?
The bible been not been necesarilly changed. But reinterpreted thousands of ways, especially from a rocky start as the history of early christianity suggest. And so much so that it could not identify with judaism anymore and branched out as its own religion yet still uses the same canon of books the jews originally used.
@edwinasencio5727 it hasn't been reinterpreted its been translated any changes are minimal translation items, of course it's going to branch away from judism the law has been fulfilled so the story continues.
@@marissajones1840 the fact that many denominations of christianity exist (more so than any other religion) based on interpretations of text like example Catholic and Protestant is proof that your claim has no bearing on historical facts. Your statement of translations is a non sequitor, they can be perfectly translated (they arent but thats not my point) and people can still interpret them in their own ways.
@@edwinasencio5727 because I was saying this 👇
Me: WHICH QURAN IS TRUE?
Because i'll say the Quran have more New update then the bible
1. The Varsha Quran
2. Hafs Quran
3. Qulun Quran
4. Al Bazzi Quran
5. Qunbul Quran
6. Al Duri Quran
7. Al Suri Quran
8. Hisam Quran
9. Ibn Dhakwan Quran
10. Khalaf Quran
11. Khallad Quran
12. Abdul Harith Quran
13. Ibn Wardan Quran
14. Ibn Ayyash Qurah
15. Ibn Jamaz Quran
16. Ruwas Quran
17. Rawh Quran
18. Ishaq Quran
19. Idris al Hadded Quran
20. Biringham Quran
21. Saana Mosque Quran
22. Saana Mosque Quran (2nd)
23. Quran of Uthman
24. The Famous Blue Quran
25. The Quran-Assad New Standard Version (2017)
26. Quran, the Final Testament by Rashid Kalifa
HOW MANY QURAN VERSIONS DOES IT TAKE TO PROVE THE QURAN TO BE A FALSE Book? Lol
@@edwinasencio5727 how someone interprets the text is not relevant to what you are claiming, the different denominations are for your irrelevant reason difference in interpretation of the text but if you look at the bibles they're reading you'll see they're all the same bibles outside of the catholic which is the same but also includes the apocrypha. Historically there have been rewrites and they're marked as forgeries such as the slavers bible, the Thomas Jefferson bible, and in recent days the chinese bible but those are distinguished as different and false, the different translations actually help paint a much clearer picture if you're genuine when reading and not trying to poke holes.
I agree that Christianity has been responsible for a lot of moral progress, and I love the book, "Dominion." But arguing that parts of the Bible represent "a compromise with a fallen people" is some VERY thin ice to be skating on, my friend.
God doesn’t give us challenges that we can’t handle.
Asking humanity to abolish slavery overnight was something we couldn’t do just like that. We are fallen beings after all.
It’s not thin ice, it’s reality. When you compare the OT law with surrounding empires, it’s actually much fairer and moral. I recommend “Is God a Moral Monster” by Paul Copan
I agree, especially given how much Jesus talked up the Torah
Matthew 19:8 He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so.
I dont think it's a stretch to say that since the Law of Moses comprised on divorce "because of your hardness of heart", that the Law of Moses was compromising in other areas as well.
he didn't talk up the Torah he explained what it "actually" signified @@dominicguye8058
Morality is not sounding as objective as I thought it would be.
Still objective bud... its harder to up hold when people arent equal to begin with
@@reyis_here945 Do you know what we call it when we recognize that morality changes across time and culture? Moral relativism. Welcome to postmodernism. :)
@@HangrySaturn oh look at this its a coin🪙, I wonder what will happen if I fl... whoa... it land landed on "one side"... wow i wonder what would happen if I... whoa... would you look at that, "the exact same thing happened again" and again and again... you see where this is analogy is leading right
@@reyis_here945 I'm listening to a choir of dwarves singing in bass about rock and stone. So, no, I don't know where this analogy is leading -- but I'm sure you can enlighten me!
@@HangrySaturn only if the analogy is allowed extremes, so... do you comply
Stop making excuses for a flawed text written by men.
TIL that reasoning is an excuse :P
Jesus didn't die for Muslims neither Jews,we don't need human sacrifice to save our sins, that is paganism
But in the Old Testament we see animal sacrifice used to represent the coming messiah? The ram caught in the bush is an example. We needed someone to live the perfect life that we cannot live. Therefore Christ had to die for our sins.
Just because you reject the sacrifice of Jesus doesn't undo what has been done, you are not the first nor the last to reject the sacrifice of Jesus the Pharisees, Romans (of that time) and the Sadducees did that while he died in front of them
Jesus died for everyone, even if you try to cut yourself off from The Lord
Maybe but what about god
And kissing a stone is not paganism I guess
Grow up and get over this fiction !
Clearly it’s why none of us that believe the Bible, are out here acting barbaric.
Hahahahahahaha!!! Not eating shellfish…. Hahahahahahaha!
Real fans will know this is a reupload 🫡