One thing you failed to realize, they were on the run from Egypt, I am sure they were pushed to travel farther than the normal distance in a day...remember God gave them strength and also preserved them, even their shoes and clothes didn't wear out, so your search is going to be futile because you are only going on what man can do on his own, not with the power of God to give them strength and ability. I believe Ron Watt's find is more accurate...he found the wells, the cows etched in rock, the split rock the relics on the bottom of sea, he proved it with lots more evidence than you show, remember the pillars erected on the opposite shores of the Red Sea? Yes study the scriptures, but remember God is God and He can do the impossible. You think as mortal man thinks, try thinking beyond your mortal learning.
Dear @@sajeedsaji1742 , There is no evidence that Mt Sinai is in "Saudi Arabia". Some people have claimed this based on their misunderstanding of Ἀραβία in Gal. 4:25 combined with their misunderstanding of 1st century geography of the Biblical lands. Mt Sinai is somewhere on the Sinai Peninsula (Imagine Mt. Sinai, on the Sinai peninsula, who would have thought that !), which was part of Ἀραβία in the 1 Century. Some people even naively propose the Sinai Peninsula was a part of Egypt in the 15th cen. B.C. contrary to establish evidence. Using the Scriptural data, it appears Associates for Biblical Research has located the location of Mt. Sinai. There are some interesting indicators but the site have never been excavated. Be Well DZ
very funny and very apt. Who puts the commercials on? Is it youtube or the person that does the show? Kevin Lakes's sasquatch show is 20 minutes long and has about 3 or 4 commercials. Does the youtuber get money for showing the commercials, and more money for more commercials?
Jabal al-Lawz (the Mountain of Almonds). and Jabal Maqla (the Burned Mountain). There you find the Midianites stories about Moses. His well, where he met one of the daughters of Jethro the priest of the Midianites and everything else mentioned in the Bible. But you will find nothing on the Sinai Peninsula because the Israelites never lived there for 40 years. And it was always Egyptian territory with mining and military presence going on. Not so Midian in north west Saudi-Arabia.
exactly, he knows this but isnt allowed to film there so he wouldnt have had an episode. Just about all of his shows are full of deceptive slight lies to get to his conclusion.
@@travissk5036 yeah I really like that he gets outside the bubble with what hes trying to present, but then does the lie to forge an opinion thing, very irritating
My sinai is in Saudi Arabia. Its got a black top, a cave 3 quarter the way up and at the bottom is the rock that got split by lightning and a spring from the base it also has a stone bull/cow and a flat rock table
Make it make sense. How far would all of the people have to travel each day to make it there in the time that the Bible says? Is that travel time realistic?. Is it within the distance the Bible describes in relation to other cities the Bible mentions?
Wyatt was never a serious archaeologist, thought he did claim to be, but Wyatt did make money speaking about his "discoveries". At least this guy in the video is trying to use the Scriptures to locate Mt. Sinai. Be well DZ
Simcha, Ipuwer's account of The Slaves and Evildoers leaving Egypt (Firmly dated to 1615- 1613 B.C. by the eruption of The Greek Island of Thera/Santorini), details the entire account. What the Egyptians called The Destroyer is back right now, you mite see it in the morning skies, or at Sunset as a Red Ball near our Sun.
Dendro chronology of tree rings estimate the date of Thera (Santorini) major eruption to around 1560 BC altho there was a smaller Thera eruption around 1610 BC ~ 1630 BC according to radiocarbon 14 dates.
try to remember contantine's mother declared the spot ,the spot in the Bible, also this was the very edge of the empire it did not extend into arabia. mt. Sini was an active volcano. does the place look like it? no. the tablets where made out of black stone, not found on this mountain but it is found in saudi and there is more evidence found in saudi.
I got it from oil workers through Canadian bridge and iron. My late uncle Ralph worked for them. strike maps of Saudi Arabia. film the oil workers took. right now there is a fence around the Mt in Saudi. My Uncle saw the the mountain and walked it. he saw the alters, blood channels, he saw the split rock and where the cave is located. and the foot prints left on the stones.
I'm quite inclined to agree with you. The area has a number of Hebrew inscriptions from what I assume to be pilgrims to the holy mountain. I also believe that the mountain described in the Book of Exodus was sacred to Jethro, the Priest of Midion.
@@robsirois1083 Arab inscriptions and its inhabitants are Arabs and are sanctified by the Arabs, and Jether is an Arab and this is the land of his Arab descendants.. The Hebrews are only wanderers
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me. Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point ! So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez ! Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity. The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
The path of the Exodus as follows: Rameses ----> Succoth (Exodus 12:37) ------> towards the Red Sea --------> by way of the desert road -(Exodus 13: 17-18)------->Etham (near the edge of the desert, Exodus 13: 20) ---------> Pihahiroth (between Migdol and the sea in front of Baal-zephon, Exodus 14:2 & 9) ------------> crossing the Red Sea (Exodus 14:22) --------->-Marah ---->Elim ( in Arabia, Exodus 15: 27) --------------> Desert of Sin (Ex. 16:1)------------------>Rephidim (Ex. 17:1) ---------------> Sinai (Ex.19:1, in Arabia according to Paul in Gal. 4:24-25) Clearly, there must be a crossing of the Red Sea from the Sinai Peninsula to Arabia through the Gulf of Aqaba (part of the Red Sea) for the Israelites to get the shortest route to Mt. Sinai where God appeared to Moses on a burning bush and to where God said Moses would bring the people to worship him. There is only one beach in Sinai Peninsula overlooking the Arabian Peninsula by way of the Red Sea, that can accommodate millions of people. That is the Nuweiba Beach. There is an undersea pathway from Nuweiba Beach to the other side. All other pathways along the Gulf of Aqaba are too deep for the Israelites to pass through without the waters. The remains of the Egyptian chariots, like the wheels can be found scattered undersea near the Nuweiba Beach and the opposite beach in Arabia, presumably Baal-zephon. The crossing of the Red Sea could not be from Egypt Proper to the Sinai Peninsula since that would mean crossing the Suez Canal. That would be unnecessary since there is the main road called the "Way of the Philistine" where Abraham, Joseph and his brothers and Jacob and later on Mary and Joseph and Jesus (while escaping from Herod) passed through going to and from Egypt. While initially that main road can be used to cross the Sinai peninsula from Egypt Proper, nonetheless, God diverted their path from that main road to avoid encountering and making battle with the Philistines by proceeding towards the Red Sea by way of the long desert road of the Sinai Peninsula until they reach the end of the desert road and to a large beach between the mountains and the red sea and in front of Baal-zephon which is opposite, by the sea, in the North West portion of the Arabian Peninsula. That is the Nuweiba Beach. The biblical proof that indeed the Nuweiba Beach is Pi-hahiroth where the Israelites where trapped between the mountains of Migdol and the sea is Exodus 14:10 10 And when Pharaoh drew nigh, the children of Israel lifted up their eyes, and, behold, the Egyptians marched after them; and they were sore afraid: and the children of Israel cried out unto the Lord. The verse says, "the children of Israel LIFTED UP THEIR EYES. This means they are in a lower elevation from where the Egyptian troops are coming in pursuit of them. Looking at satellite map the pathway going to Nuweiba Beach is a mountainous area and the people had to descend to go to Nuweiba Beach.
One thing to consider is: humans 2000 years ago had a stronger bone structure, probably 30% more brain mass. People 3500 years ago were totally superior to us. The people begore the Big Flood Super humans comparef with us. Most of us would collapse death, even at a age of 20 marching to the desert with the Israelites. We modern humans are to weak. Moses was 80 years old and died with 120, like his siblings. Just look at thw age of Abraham, Isaak and the people before. Strong, very healthy, unbelievable long life spans. Evolution theory is a satanic lie, the opposite is true. The human race, thos world are dying, falling apart. Mutations mean to 99.99% a loss of information, we arr getting weaker, and weaker and dumber. Based on skull measurements, the human brain appears to have been shrinking over the last 5,000 or so years.
@@magistradox39 Sorry to burst your bubble but if the human brain appears to have been shrinking over a long period it's called evolution....or in this case (devolution)
@@evertjan9479 There is no Evolution (the theory of Evolution). Devolution exists. There is a book in my possession: Genetic Entropy by John C. Sanford. What gives a good case for it.
Viewers need to review Ryan Mauro's work, and others concerning the location of Mt Sinai in Saudi Arabia, near the Valley of Jethro, Moses' father in law
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me. Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point ! So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez ! Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity. The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
Filbert Odeerani ...yeah I seen where Ron Wyatt found it in Saudi Arabia. It appeared to be very compelling considering that I had heard that this part of Saudi in ancient times was actually considered to be part of Sinai, Egypt. This mount even was blackened on the top which corroborates the account of God’s fiery presence on the mountain top. I don’t remember now but I think there were several other things discovered there that isolated that particular mountain from all the others as they true Mount Sinai. The Saudi authorities also had fenced this mountain in to prevent close exploration so as not to give any credence to the Bible.
@@chriswood3370 Hes not an archeologist all the claims that he put forth there's no proof no evidence hes a nut case and his wife doesn't even believe him he tells you that out of his own mouth There's no paper trail to his claims only word-of-mouth
I think this is an exaggerated advertisement for Middle Eastern restaurants instead of a serious expedition. Either that or he got funding to try out local cuisine with the excuse of looking for Mt. Sinai. There is no evidence of anything specifically relating to Mount Sinai around this mountain, like Elijah's Cave for example. What a waste of time.
"The bible says it's within the land of the midianites... but those are in saudi arabia, not the sinai peninsula, so we won't be looking there." 4:00 Well, you're not going to find mount sinai then, are ya?
@@googleuser8448 Jabal al Lawz is the true sight. It was Ron Wyatt who discovered it in the late 70s. The family who followed up next was Jim and Penny Caldwell. The photos and evidence they brought out of Saudi are very compelling. Another very compelling source was Dr. Kim who was the personal physician of a Saudi prince who went in there under an authorization from the Saudi family. All the findings line up perfectly with the Bible. (which is why so many refute it) Check out the different testimonies... the evidence is strong.
@@googleuser8448 It is stated in the Bible that Moses went to a place called Midian. Well, lo and behold! Midian is STILL the name of the place found in the sleepy town of Al Bad in the province of Tabuk in Saudi Arabia. In fact, Jethro's tomb (Moses' father-in-law) is found there and is open for tourists. And all those spots (Mt. Sinai, golden calf altar, Red Sea crossing, split rock at Horeb, Elim, etc.) are just a few kilometers aways, all within Tabuk area.
I don't know how i got here... but i scrolled the comments and then decided i couldn't watch the video... Ron Wyatt already found Mt. Sinai in Saudi Arabia.
"Ron Wyatt already found Mt. Sinai in Saudi Arabia." What - Jabal al-Lawz Really ? This video tries to identify the location of Sinai using the Scriptural descriptions. Example - Jabal al-Lawz is not 11 days journey from Kadesh Barnea (unless you move Kadesh Barnea a hundred miles) Wyatt's line of thinking - how could Mt. Sinai be on the Sinai Peninsula ? Who could come up with that idea, especially when there is a bigger mountains somewhere else. Lets chose Jabal al-Lawz, because this mountain has lots of petroglyphs in the area and it doesn't matter if the petroglyphs are much older or much younger than Moses. I understand how people will fall for Wyatt's stories but there is no explanation why any scholarly minded person would find Wyatt's "discoveries" reliable. Be Well DZ
@@Silverheart1956 how do you know that the Scripture isn't flawed? scripture is not an ORAL tradition like the Quran is... it is passed down over centuries by MAN, who has personal agendas, can be easily influenced by money, power, fame, women, the devil... how do you know that the men who transcribed the scripture weren't influenced? you don't even have a chain of transmission for the "scripture". WHO transmitted WHAT to who? Do you know? Look at the evidence first... what does the evidence say? Nobody can be 100% sure where Mt. Sinai is... BUT... all the physical evidence, points to Saudi Arabia. It is more reasonable and logical to believe that Mt. Sinai is in Saudi Arabia.
The easy walking speed of a person is approx. 4 km/h. A brisk walk is 5.5 km/h. Depending on how many hours are considered to be a 'day', and allowing for at least one hour for rest breaks, a person could cover approx. 28 kms in and eight hour day, or approx. 35 kms at a brisk pace. The nearest city is 32 kms from where I live, and I have covered that in six hours several times.
For a weak, degenerated (because of mutations = loss of information in the DNA) modern human being. Ancient people were stronger, had more brain, bone and muscle mass.
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me. Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point ! So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez ! Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity. The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
There's an area in Yemen also known as Midian. Moses had goats/sheep with him bt he was not on a grazing trip. His family was with him & they were returning to Egypt.
So Simcha,. Why have you not followed this up? This is huge! Id buy a ticket and visit. There are so few places as historically significant as this! Truly, and I'm not religious but love history, and if something can be pinpointed, I'd pay to experience it!
Scripture says Mt. Sinai was burnt at the Top ? Where Jebel al-lawz is not burnt at the top. There are many mountains in Saudia Arabia that are dark on top. it's rather typical to the mountains in that area. You can even see this on Google maps. compare jebel al-lawz with other mountains around there. Be Well, DZ
@@Silverheart1956 Precisely that is the point, the Bible says that God descended to the mountain in fire like a furnace, it does not say that the top got burned, however by the previous explanation not only Mt Sinai's top got burned, but the other surrounding mountains as well. It is a strong possibility.
@@Gavriel-og6jv All subjecture, all stated without a scrap of verifiable evidence & all stated on a subject, that is beyond ridiculous & based on religious delusion! No deities exist, All Manmade fictional belief!
It is almost as if this guy was paid to shore up the idea that the real Mt. SInai is located in the Sinai peninsula. Trying to keep merchandise sales up at the gift shop at the one that Constantine's mother supposedly picked. There is nothing at the Sinai Peninsula location that would indicate that it was the mountain that Moses met with God. That this guy didn't bother to see what where the Bible says it was located, leads me to believe that he just threw some stuff together and took his check. I do not think that this was a serious effort by this famous archeologist. Galatians says that Mt. Sinai is in Arabia, that was during Paul's Era, maybe Midian no longer was a separate country from Arabia by then but It doesn't get any clearer than that.
@@JamesJames-nr5rl totally agree, its like they ignore the bible as history documented. I don’t think or understand how accurate the bible is. When the word of God is so accurate that every 50th letter spells out Gods name. What are the odds. This guy used goats as a marker. No one is that stupid. Your right he’s appealing to who will buy his snake oil. Its sad really.
@@PeterGrenader nope. There is zero evidence at that site of it being the real mt Sinai. The jabal al lawz site has all the physical evidence. That’s where mt Sinai was.
Ron Wyatt's discovery of Mount Sinai has all of the indicators that it is the correct site. If I remember correctly, the locals believe that it is Mount Sinai, and it is confirmed by the government of Sudan.
@@johnhenthorne1588 yes you’re right but one thing I will say....I never care at all what locals say or the government. That’s how “traditions” get started...and traditions are not reliable. As a matter of fact, governments can be way off. I want to see hard evidence. That’s always what I look for. Wyatts discovery has all the evidence so yes, that’s Sinai
Jabal Musa is the real Mount Sinai. The Bible list nineteen geographic locations to identify it being that mountain. But sadly not even Ron Wyatt has read and studied the Bible enough to acknowledge it. If any of you need proof of this being so, then go read where Jezebel ordered a later Prophet of God to be put to death. This Prophet went into hiding at Mount Sanai Moses mountain also. When you find these verses read them and it gives you the exact location and why i say nobody studies the Bible enough to know.
I love how the woman in the intro is either just your wife or a staff member you roped into doing it. You didn't even bother actually hiring a dancer to do it.
In the mid1990's, I worked in Northern Sinai with Egyptian Desert Research Center, and a team of experienced Professors of Geology and their graduate students. My Boston University Ph.D. Thesis showed the origin of the springs at Kadesh Barnae in bedrock fractures that intersect wadis. I visited this place and studied it in detail, observing ground water upwelling. There is a set of anticlines, prominent in the northern quarter of Sinai, trending northeast-southwest. One of these structures is named Gebel Halal (Holy Mountain). One of the Professors told me that this is the place where Moses (who, in my opinion, was likely a composite mythical character) allegedly received the Ten Commandments. The Egyptian name suggests that it has long been called by that designation, i.e., a Holy Place.
Kadesh is Petra. You can't get to the Kadesh-Barnae on some incorrect maps in 11 days travel by foot via the Mt. Sier road from Jebel Lawz. You can make it to Petra however.
@@501Mobiusthe cIaim that Kadesh Barnea is Petra was made from Flavius Josephus, but he is wrong. Josephus also claimed that one of the paradise rivers is the ganges (india), which is incorrect
@@xXJonnyJamboXx Ain Qadeis is only thought to be Kadesh Barnea because of 19th Century explorers. They ignored things that should have disqualified those springs.
This mountain meets all of your criteria. But it does not have a cave where Elijah could have camped. It also does not have the carvings that exists at the base of the mountain found by the anesthesiologist, Ron Wyatt. I find Ron Wyatt's mountain more believable especially since the locals know that it is Mount Sinai.
Yeah, while I like this guys videos... he seems like a 25 cent archeologist to me... with all the silly modern videos thrown in for no reason at all...
@@Berter007 YAHWEH is not ALLAH Proof Jesus Christ is not Muslim. 1) Jesus invites us to be sons of God. Islam invites people to be slaves of allah. 2) Jesus taught us the Our Father. Islam does not beleive addressing allah "father" because Islam make slaves of allah not sons of allah. 3) Jesus practice the sabbath on Jewish Temple. Muhammad broke the law. 4) Jesus taught us to love our enemies. Islam and Muhammad taught to keep hatred in the hearts against enemies. 5) Jesus is against polygamy. Muhammad practiced polygamy and even permitted sex slaves. 6) Jesus did not own and encourage slavery of another person. Muhammad encourage slave trade and sex slavery and all forms of slavery. Islam is fraud!
So this place that holds thousands as he put it is two small in that there were over 2 million people plus goats sheep herds and cattle. I think this needs a rethink.
@ReligionlessFAITH Talking Bible only. Exo 12:37 And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot that were men, beside children. Exo 12:38 And a mixed multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, even very much cattle. So being generous. If you give each foot man a wife and just one child. That's 1 million 800,000.
@ReligionlessFAITH They were in bondage 430 years before leaving Egypt. Exo 12:40 Now the sojourning of the children of Israel, who dwelt in Egypt, was four hundred and thirty years. Exo 12:41 And it came to pass at the end of the four hundred and thirty years, even the selfsame day it came to pass, that all the hosts of the LORD went out from the land of Egypt. When they began this time there were 66 Male decedents born that walked in with Jacob. That means Jacob already had 54 Grandchildren that were male. That's 4.5 children per one one of the original males. These 54 Grandchildren If I remember 4 of these Children were great grandchildren and the rest still had children to go. Lets give a generation before having children 40 years. That gives you 10 generations. In 10 generations with the average of .3 children that is 3,188,646
@ReligionlessFAITH This is just were I wanted to get to. This show is looking at Archaeology evidence for where a biblical event happened using the bible. With that said it's impossible if one does not believe in the the bible to prove where an event happened at if they themselves do not believe in the narrative itself. Clearly the bible itself says they were in bondage. Your claim is you don't believe it and we are not talking biblical narrative we are only really talking outside evidence really. Best to you and your family. And by the way if the Nephiliim are fallen angels then only the human part could be destroyed therefore the fallen angel part could happen again. Since angels even fallen are not destroyed till the end.
@Chris Sardelis Have you considered the vast amount of time that has passed and the difference in the terrain? There is evidence to this. Was the route you spoke about even in existence at that time considering the change in terrain? Here is another question did God have a purpose for not going the shortest route which is the question we ask when looking at the bible. What was the route taken in scripture? You say there would certainly be evidence of such a vast amount of people. So by science how is this proven.? It certainly cannot be by human remains. That would be impossible? Look it up for yourself the decomposing of remains in an aired environment. So what evidence are you speaking of after thousands of years? The bible makes it clear that the possessions were continually carried with the people including all the artifacts carried out of Egypt. As for the food they ate? Manna and quail. Again bones decompose. There would be no evidence to find. As far as evidence goes it would be does the places mention exist? That is the best your going to get. What do you have?
@Chris Sardelis You do realize that 5 million people attended Cubs World Series celebration in a single day they went to the event and back home in one day. The parade route was a mere 6 miles. There was no injuries. Of course they drove to the event but still had to walk to the positions on the parade route. That's 5 million that came in and left in a single day in a very small area. We are not talking square miles here we are talking sidewalks and streets hemmed in by buildings. These people came and went on foot. In Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport every day in this less then half mile building if you average on the on day over the year 300,000 plus employees come and go per day and that is just the ones counted that fly. Don't forget many of the family members go in to see them off. It's only a half mile. Can 2 million leave Egypt on foot in one day. Why yes it would be quite possible. Now to your question. First I did not mention that trade routes did not exits although it could be interpreted that way. I was stating that this shorted route may be longer then you calculated considering the change of terrain. But to me that is a non point. I asked you to look at the story of why they did not go the shortest route not that there was not a shorter route. I was hoping you would look at the scriptures of why they did not and the events associated with it and the path taken according to scripture. That is 3 books that you want others to condense down to one event. Here is the short answer to your question. Moses being directed was the leader but God was the one calling the shots. He said lead them this way and I will show them the way by a pillar of fire by night and a cloud by day. Your answer is in the heart of God there was no intent to lead them from point A to point B directly. And there was a purpose in his heart to rid the people he was leading from the beliefs they had acquired in Egypt itself. Thus the wondering around for years. He was leading them to something. And in the story part of the answer is land. 40 years of wandering for land? No it clearly states he was waiting for a people that would believe and that the generation before would die before this would happen because of unbelief in what was promised. This is the short answer. More importantly these same books have hidden in them the proclamation that Christ world come and what he would do. Again to those who would one day believe. That is the reason why because God was raising up something not just in that generation but in a further generation. Call it hogwash call it what ever you will. But the reason your friends don't change their point of view is because they have something in their spirits that they know is true and will one day come to see. Same as these people wondering around in a desert that God was simply teaching to believe in a promise. My personal conclusion is I have seen many people wonder around and face many things without finding any reason for it with absolutely no belief in anything including other fellow humans. Can you wonder in a desert for 40 years and die without hope? Certainly and that is what this story is all about. Hope or no hope.
Sinai used to be called Midian, it was the wilderness Moses took his people to escape Egypt as Ramses chased them through the mountains to the Gulf of Aqaba where they crossed from Wasit and Nuweibaa into Saudi Arabia and hooked around through Jordan. You can look at it on Google Earth.
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me. Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point ! So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez ! Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity. The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
I think one of the BIG problems here, is that the constant marker of 'Elim' and the '2-week travel time by a large group'. See, from all appearances, it is not Elim that is the 'route' marker, but Eliat (northern tip of the Gulf of Aqaba)...which then places you within 100-miles (2-weeks) from Jabal-al-Lawz, which is Mt. Sinai (in Saudi Arabia, near Midionite territory)...and the back-up verification of this is that the 'stone which Moses split with his staff...for water' is only a few miles NW of Jabal-al-Lawz...which Ron Wyatt did all the work on, anyway. ALL THIS is guarded in Saudi, anyhow...
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me. Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point ! So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez ! Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity. The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
What are your thoughts on the latest discoveries, evidence, and ancient stories that Mt. Sanai is actually located in modern day Saudi Arabia, and not Egypt???
IT,S IN THE BIBLE , I DON,T UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE ARE LOOKING ALL OVER THE PLACE, IT,S IN ARABIA, BIBLICAL SPEAKING THERE IS NO SAUDI ARABIA NOR IN THE KORAN, ONLY ARABIA, BY CALLING THAT NAME PUTS THEM IN THE BIBLICAL BRACKET, WHEN TALKING SECULAR YOU USE THE NAME ,BIBLICAL STRICTLY ARABIA
@@sentinal2343 It is stated in the Bible that Moses went to a place called Midian. Well, lo and behold! Midian is STILL the name of the place found in the sleepy town of Al Bad in the province of Tabuk in Saudi Arabia. In fact, Jethro's tomb (Moses' father-in-law) is found there and is open for tourists. And all those spots (Mt. Sinai, golden calf altar, Red Sea crossing, split rock at Horeb, Elim, etc.) are just a few kilometers from there.
@@symph2000 WE know what's you point? Before you respond understand there's NO saudi in ARABIA in this context, pls don,t waste my time with trivial stats, i.ll take your silence as acknowledgement you don,t really know what you squawking about ,like the parrot you are, pitiful!
That second mountain they go to is Hashem El Tarif. Which actually is the Mt. Sin that the Wilderness of Sin is named after. Some 25 more miles toward Midian along the Way of the Wilderness is Taba Beach on the Gulf of Aqaba where the quail came ashore.
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me. Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point ! So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez ! Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity. The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
This is not Mt.Sinai.Mt.Sinai is in Arabia even the Bible says that! It is mountain known was Jabal El Laws or the Mountain of God's Laws. This is in Midian in western Arabia on the western coast of Arabia, on the east coast of the eastern arm of the Red Sea. There is a plain on the western side that is the only place suitable didn't the people to be called before the crossing of the Red Sea or Yam Suph.
You work with what you have. I recall that this episode was first aired many years ago. Today, there might still be a candidate in the Sinai Peninsula, but I believe the Saudi site has more evidence to back it up. As the Mt. Sinai search shows, places are not always where we think they are. We don't know their starting points (not mentioned in the Bible), and place names can change. Another episode deals with the possible Red Sea Crossing site at Nuweibaa, making the Saudi site more plausible, including the split rock water source, site of the Midianites, Desert of Sin, Cave of Ezra(?), and much more.
@@eviemack6138 I understand he found one of the candidates for Biblical Mount Sinai, but I don't recall which one. I think the one in Saudi has the most evidence in favor, since the site has everything described in the Bible, including being burned, the split rock that gave water, 12 markers (stones), and much more. Also, it fits with where Midian is, etc.
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me. Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point ! So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez ! Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity. The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
@@Michael-pn5lp All interpretations must start with assumptions. It appears you (and I) may be assuming different starting points, and even different amounts of God's miracle involvement. For me, I believe that the preponderance of evidence best matches what I described in my original post - Occam's Razor.
@@HunterChristianDarkman The Gulf of Suez extended further north in antiquity - it's been mapped out well into the fresh water marshy lake reed area that drained into it. Proving the three day journey to the crossing point, the fourth day crossing during the night and celebration on the opposite shore for the rest of the fourth day: Proving the Exodus Gulf of Suez Crossing: “And they departed from Rameses in the first month, on the fifteenth day of the first month; on the morrow after the passover the children of Israel went out with an high hand (“from Rameses”) in the sight of all the Egyptians.” (Numbers 33:3)
For THREE DAYS they travelled into the wilderness, well within reach of Pharaoh’s army:
The 15th Abib therefore was not then and is not now a weekly Sabbath day. 1st day 2nd day 3rd day The 15th Abib they all travelled and camped at Succoth (see Exodus 12:37). The 16th Abib they travelled again until afternoon and camped at Etham (see Exodus 13:20). The 17th Abib Yahweh instructed them to turn away from exiting Egypt eastwards above the top end of the Red Sea (Gulf of Suez), and to travel further down the west side within Egypt proper and camp at Pihahiroth (see Exodus 14:2). Only now Pharaoh thought that they were going to actually try and escape Egypt, but had somehow made a wrong turn (see Exodus 14:3-9). Leaving Egypt was never on Pharaoh’s agenda ! Enclosed here between the desert mountains and the sea, Pharaoh’s spies told him the Israelites were trapped and he personally lead his army in to guarantee their return to bondage.
Starting the 4th day 18th Abib NIGHT Yahweh parted the Red Sea and the Israelites passed through safely:
“And the angel of God, which went before the camp of Israel, removed and went behind them; and the pillar of the cloud went from before their face, and stood behind them:” (Exodus 14:19).
This “angel of God” was Christ Himself:
“Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ” (1 Corinthians 10:1-4).
He is our Shepherd - the Stone of Israel - see Genesis 49:24 ! “And Moses STRECHED FORTH HIS HAND OVER THE SEA, and the sea returned to his strength when the morning appeared; and the Egyptians fled against it; and Yahweh overthrew the Egyptians in the midst of the sea. And the waters returned, and covered the chariots, and the horsemen, and all the host of Pharaoh that came into the sea after them; there remained not so much as one of them. But the children of Israel walked upon dry land in the midst of the sea; and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left. THUS Yahweh saved Israel THAT DAY out of the hand of the Egyptians; and Israel saw the Egyptians dead upon the sea shore. And Israel saw that great work which Yahweh did upon the Egyptians: and the people feared Yahweh, and believed Yahweh, and his servant Moses” (Exodus 14:27-31).
“Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto Yahweh… And Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, took a timbrel in her hand; and all the women went out after her with timbrels and with dances. And Miriam answered them, Sing ye to Yahweh, for he hath triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the sea.” (Exodus 15:1-21).
“And they remembered that God was their rock, and the high God their redeemer . . . And smote all the firstborn in Egypt; the chief of their strength in the tabernacles of Ham: But made his own people to go forth like sheep, and guided them in the wilderness like a flock. And he led them on safely, so that they feared not: but the sea overwhelmed their enemies.” (Psalms 78:35,51-53)
This 18th was a great “day of gladness”, salvation, celebration and thanksgiving ! This 18th according to the Dead Sea Scrolls solar calendar, was the weekly Sabbath day ! This 18th Sabbath day, Christ our Shepherd/Stone/Rock herded the whole flock of Israel out of the Egyptian pit ! (N.B. see Matthew 12:8-13). This 18th was the weekly Sabbath day on Yahweh's Heavenly Calendar, and so they would not have travelled any further that day, because they were already out of the Egyptian pit and it was fitting to celebrate and praise Yahweh, as they did for the rest of that day on the opposite shore of the Red Sea !
After three days journey across Egypt to the Red Sea - this 4th day 18th Abib Sabbath day salvation of Israel is also that 18th Abib Sabbath Day Resurrection of Christ - Lord of the Sabbath Day - after three full nights and three full days in the dark tomb: “He will swallow up death in victory; and the Lord GOD will wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall he take away from off all the earth: for Yahweh hath spoken it.” (Isaiah 25:8)
So Moses and Yahweh didn’t lie - they did travel THREE DAYS into the Egyptian wilderness to sacrifice, and by the end of the third days travel they encamped at the Red Sea:
That 18th NIGHT starting the 4th day, Pharaoh, his chariots, horses and army were all sacrificed in the Red Sea. Death for Israel was literally swallowed up. Pharaoh had no idea that he himself and his oppressive army were to be Yahweh’s sacrifice (sacrificial Red Sea slaughter/feast in divine judgment) The Red Sea Gulf of Suez, "tongue of the Egyptian sea", as the Bible calls it, literally swallowed them up and the fowls of the air and monsters of the deep had a great feast ! Now there was no Pharaoh to return to and Israel was free to go !
Problems, Sinai was part of Egypt. The Red Sea part on the Saudi Arabian side of the peninsula actually had Ancient Egyptian chariot parts found in it. Also a mountain in Saudi Arabia seems to match the biblical description of Mount Sinai.
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me. Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point ! So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez ! Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity. The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
@@Michael-pn5lp Right. Completely ignore the archeological evidence that is at the site in Saudi Arabia that matches the biblical description, including Egyptian chariots under the water, the Hebrew settlement remnants, and mountain matching the description of mount Sinai, including where there was an altar.
I can also drop a lot of artifacts overboard in the Gulf of Aqaba, return two years later when they are full of barnacles and call it 'evidence' - that proves nothing ! Has this 'evidence' been examined and verified by experts ? NO !
Proving the Exodus Gulf of Suez Crossing: “And they departed from Rameses in the first month, on the fifteenth day of the first month; on the morrow after the passover the children of Israel went out with an high hand (“from Rameses”) in the sight of all the Egyptians.” (Numbers 33:3)
For THREE DAYS they travelled into the wilderness, well within reach of Pharaoh’s army:
The 15th Abib therefore was not then and is not now a weekly Sabbath day. 1st day 2nd day 3rd day The 15th Abib they all travelled and camped at Succoth (see Exodus 12:37). The 16th Abib they travelled again until afternoon and camped at Etham (see Exodus 13:20). The 17th Abib Yahweh instructed them to turn away from exiting Egypt eastwards above the top end of the Red Sea (Gulf of Suez), and to travel further down the west side within Egypt proper and camp at Pihahiroth (see Exodus 14:2). Only now Pharaoh thought that they were going to actually try and escape Egypt, but had somehow made a wrong turn (see Exodus 14:3-9). Leaving Egypt was never on Pharaoh’s agenda ! Enclosed here between the desert mountains and the sea, Pharaoh’s spies told him the Israelites were trapped and he personally lead his army in to guarantee their return to bondage.
Starting the 4th day 18th Abib NIGHT Yahweh parted the Red Sea and the Israelites passed through safely:
“And the angel of God, which went before the camp of Israel, removed and went behind them; and the pillar of the cloud went from before their face, and stood behind them:” (Exodus 14:19).
This “angel of God” was Christ Himself:
“Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ” (1 Corinthians 10:1-4).
He is our Shepherd - the Stone of Israel - see Genesis 49:24 ! “And Moses STRECHED FORTH HIS HAND OVER THE SEA, and the sea returned to his strength when the morning appeared; and the Egyptians fled against it; and Yahweh overthrew the Egyptians in the midst of the sea. And the waters returned, and covered the chariots, and the horsemen, and all the host of Pharaoh that came into the sea after them; there remained not so much as one of them. But the children of Israel walked upon dry land in the midst of the sea; and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left. THUS Yahweh saved Israel THAT DAY out of the hand of the Egyptians; and Israel saw the Egyptians dead upon the sea shore. And Israel saw that great work which Yahweh did upon the Egyptians: and the people feared Yahweh, and believed Yahweh, and his servant Moses” (Exodus 14:27-31).
“Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto Yahweh… And Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, took a timbrel in her hand; and all the women went out after her with timbrels and with dances. And Miriam answered them, Sing ye to Yahweh, for he hath triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the sea.” (Exodus 15:1-21).
“And they remembered that God was their rock, and the high God their redeemer . . . And smote all the firstborn in Egypt; the chief of their strength in the tabernacles of Ham: But made his own people to go forth like sheep, and guided them in the wilderness like a flock. And he led them on safely, so that they feared not: but the sea overwhelmed their enemies.” (Psalms 78:35,51-53)
This 18th was a great “day of gladness”, salvation, celebration and thanksgiving ! This 18th according to the Dead Sea Scrolls solar calendar, was the weekly Sabbath day ! This 18th Sabbath day, Christ our Shepherd/Stone/Rock herded the whole flock of Israel out of the Egyptian pit ! (N.B. see Matthew 12:8-13). This 18th was the weekly Sabbath day on Yahweh's Heavenly Calendar, and so they would not have travelled any further that day, because they were already out of the Egyptian pit and it was fitting to celebrate and praise Yahweh, as they did for the rest of that day on the opposite shore of the Red Sea !
After three days journey across Egypt to the Red Sea - this 4th day 18th Abib Sabbath day salvation of Israel is also that 18th Abib Sabbath Day Resurrection of Christ - Lord of the Sabbath Day - after three full nights and three full days in the dark tomb: “He will swallow up death in victory; and the Lord GOD will wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall he take away from off all the earth: for Yahweh hath spoken it.” (Isaiah 25:8)
So Moses and Yahweh didn’t lie - they did travel THREE DAYS into the Egyptian wilderness to sacrifice, and by the end of the third days travel they encamped at the Red Sea:
That 18th NIGHT starting the 4th day, Pharaoh, his chariots, horses and army were all sacrificed in the Red Sea. Death for Israel was literally swallowed up. Pharaoh had no idea that he himself and his oppressive army were to be Yahweh’s sacrifice (sacrificial Red Sea slaughter/feast in divine judgment) The Red Sea Gulf of Suez, "tongue of the Egyptian sea", as the Bible calls it, literally swallowed them up and the fowls of the air and monsters of the deep had a great feast ! Now there was no Pharaoh to return to and Israel was free to go !
The Great Bitter Lake is also bordered on the west side by desert and mountains 150-200 meters high, and the Gulf of Suez possibly extended into this lake - I no longer have the evidence of it's ancient shoreline. So this scenario is definitely within the THREE day travel limit to the crossing point.
Every video I see this man in he looks at the same places the secular scholars have claimed as possible sites for this or that but he doesn't even begin to bring up other places people of faith who are just as credible who have pointed out places like many have said in the comments such as jabal el laws, or in one of this mans videos claiming the pillar of fire and the pillar of smoke was really a far off volcano erupting, but it clearly says that the pillar of fire stopped the Egyptian army from destroying the Israelites while the Israelites were crossing the path made by God. People should be weary when it comes to people saying they have faith but don't match what is written in the bible, let's allow scripture to interpret scripture and as for what others say about this place or that if it doesn't match what is written to the smallest detail then I would say it probably isn't it, God bless you and yours.
I don't know any actual archaeologists who think Wyatt was correct. Watching one RUclips video does not make you an expert. In fact, lots of scholars have looked into the Saudi site, but none of the sites connected to the Jebel al Lawz date to the Late Bronze Age. That's a fact. It's not the real Mount Sinai.
Well, there are a lot of characteristics of that mountain that would fit. It has 12 pillars, a place for animal sacrifice, it has the petroglyphs, a giant altar where the Golden calf could have been. And why in the world is it fenced off and guarded?
@@markzylstra2947 But none of the dates match when the Exodus would have happened. That is critically important. It's like going to Egypt and saying that the early Israelites built the pyramids. That can't possibly be true because the pyramids were built roughly a thousand years beforehand. Some of the "characteristics" date archaeologically to nearly a thousand years *after*. So it doesn't matter at all if they are fenced off. It isn't Sinai.
@@andywitt5860 Good call my friend. I do not understand why people seem so intent on trying to prove that the real Mount Sinai is in any other place than where it's always been believed to be, in Egypt. I mean, if people actually took the time to examine the ALL the clues, then they would see it makes perfect sense. Most people who make this claim; that it's in Arabia because Paul said it was, do not understand that whenever Paul referred to Arabia, he was not talking about the country which was not even established yet, he was talking about the whole entire area. To Jews at that time the whole area was Arabia, and that is also why most people from the area, no matter what specific locale it might've been were always referred to as Arabians. Of course nowadays it's different. Now you call them according to whichever country they are from, Iraqi, Iranian, a Saudi, Kuwaiti, Lebanese and so on. Besides that there are other subtle clues. If you go to the Sinai area you will see a natural formation in the rocks that looks just like a calf, which most experts believe was where the original Israelites got the idea for making the idol. Bedouins who've attempted to stay on the slopes of Mount Sinai overnight, claim that whenever they do they are driven from it's sacred slopes by the frightening noises the wind makes at it screeches and screams thru the peaks and crevices of the holy mount, so that they are forced to flee. There are many other clues as well that the mountain is not in Arabi, one of the most important of which is the one you've already provided. The mountain Ron Wyatt discovered was a featureless mountain top with no peaks, crevices or any other type of areas where Moses might be sheltered from sight as he received the tablets of the law. And that is another thing, Jabel El Lawz does not have any kind of cliff face which the holy tablets might have been formed from in God';s cases or hewn from in Moses' case. It's just one big mountain top that has no distinguishing marks whatsoever. There is another clue as well; a monk or a Bedouin who once dwelt in the area prayed to God that he might forever provide undeniable evidence that the Mount Sinai which he dwelt next to would always have divine proof that it was the real one from the Bible. So one night God struck the entire Mountain so that now...whenever any part of the mountain rock is broken off or broken open, there inside the rock is the sign of the burning bush that Moses first saw. There are many clues as well, but this should suffice to make the people who've commented here see that they are all DEAD WRONG!
Ron Wyatt and his sons did an extensive search and discovered Mt Sinai - Jebel al Lawz , the split rock from where water gushed forth, the twelve altars made of natural stone( no tools used) for the twelve tribes etc. way back in the 80s
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me. Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point ! So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez ! Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity. The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
It was very convincing, but that location is very highly improbable considering the time it would take them to travel, along with the locations the Bible mentions.
The Late Ron Wyatt was a very Humble man, and was correct If You actually open your eyes and read the Bible and look at the evidence that is available then You would also see that But I doubt You will because it is easier to disrespect someone that cannot defend themselves (they died) than it is to look at the evidence available with an open mind and eyes and come to an informed decision through that
First, you would have to prove the bible is true and only then can you make the claim that you found a mountain that a god dictated the 10 commandments to Moses. By the way, while you were there why didn't you look for evidence of the Israelites that moses ordered the slaighter of and the broken tablets that Moses destroyed?
You're assuming Moses didn't cross the Red Sea ? Your path is your possibilities in path make that clear I'm not sure you have all your information correct maybe you should know where they crossed the Red Sea first?
The real Mount Sinai is in Saudi Arabia, the Jabel Al Lawz, and the Red Sea crossing is in Nueva beach. It was discovered by Ron Wyatt and there are some compelling evidences to support his claim such as the twelve stone pillars Moses set up at the foot of the mountain, golden calf images carved on the stones, the split rock, the burnt mountain top, etc. Many may have not believe in him because he's an amateur archaeologist, because his claims have been debunked by professional archeologists, etc. but there are those of us who still believe him through the guidance of the Holy Spirit and by judging of Ron Wyatt's character. His faith is unwavering and stood up into his testimony up to his death.
Lmao was interesting til they started talking about carbon dating. These guys should know u can’t date anything! Carbon dating relies on assumptions and is never accurate or consistent
After the six of us reached the point where we were CLOSE to Mt. Sinai, Egyptian soldiers came from all around us and told us, rather stern words were used, that we could go no further and escorted completely away from the are and told us to not return and if we did, we would be shot.
EXCELLENT OBSERVATION, any new discoveries MUST be treated with skepticism as we know things can easily be reproduced/faked to a high standard which can fool even so called experts, look at Hollywood, don,t the films look authentic
Seriously ???? Abib 15 they took off .... They arrived According to the Torah ... Ex 19.1 Exo 19:1 And in the third month of the departure of the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt, on the same day, they came into the wilderness of Sinay 47 days ....? Hello do math and study the Torah ...! 16 days of Abib 31 days of second month Arrived 3 months Total 47 days simple math
Amazing that you kept showing scenes in Israel (like every restaurant) and all your helpers are obviously Israeli but your video never mentions the word "Israel"
Chick Sage look up the one there and the real crossing. If that doesn’t spit in the face of the lie I don’t know what does. The great deception is afoot.
It seems, to me, that the location of the theophany is not specifically stated. At least, not specifically enough to keep it from becoming a major point of contention among scholars and academics. There isn't even a consensus within the Bible, itself. The name "Sinai" is only used in the Torah by the Yahwist and Priestly source, while "Horeb" is only used by the Elohist and Deuteronomist, and even that is only according to the DH. For what it's worth, I have reviewed evidence and heard case arguments from a few of the different camps, on this subject, and some of them are persuasive but, unfortunately, it seems as though the actual location is still yet to be determined. I'm not ready to sign off on it yet, anyway, but hey, according to my ex-wife, I'm an idiot, so Mt. Sinai could be right where you think it is :) peace
@@ChickSage Look at the evidence of and at the location in Saudi Arabia at Jabal Al Lawz in all the videos of the area that is readily available on YT and read the Bible verses concerning it and then tell me that You don't know where the Real Mount Sinai is
the Major flaw you have in this story is we don't know what was considered a days time back then we just assume its 24 hours days could be longer plus they could've traveled at night too
@@walterulasinksi7031 ARE THEY IN THE BIBLE? NO, STOP ASSOCIATING THEIR NAME WITH ANYTHING BIBLICAL, ARE THEIR NAMES IN THE KORAN OR HADITH,S? NO MODERN IDIOTS HAVE NO IDEA, WHAT WOULD YOUR PROPHET SAY CALLING HIS BELOVED ARABIA SAUDI? THINK ON
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me. Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point ! So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez ! Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity. The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez
Mt.Sinai is in Saudi Arabia . There is a basalt marker set up in Egypt by King Solomon where the people crossed . Directly across from that marker was another marker in Saudi Arabia that King Solomon set up .The markers were the same The Saudis came and sawed theirs off and took it away . Up the twisted valley away on the Saudi side is a blackened mountain and a now desert plain .The locals tent dwelling arabs that live there now call the mountain Moses's mount . The un-hewn alter is there .The alter where Egyptian style of cattle were carved into it also is there . The split rock is there from where the water flowed is there . Look up some of the Ron Wyatt films - here at YOU TUBE
Mount Siani is located in Saudi Araiba, where they crossed the Gulf of Aquaba. All the evidence is there. Look up Ron Wyatt you will be shocked at what they found
This is the best video about where Mt Sinai is! Midian was located in Edom at that time and its the Reed Sea that Exodus Hebrews crossed. So the real Mt Sanai is east of the Reed See on the way to the south of Edom, which is Midian at that time! Mt Sinai would be southwest of SouthEdom. Arabian's were from Midian son of 3rd wife of Abraham after Sarai died. Midian was trading neighbor to Edom son of Issac, brother of JoacobIsrael. Midian were close brothers to Ishmael, they are family both close to Edom (Edom=Essau brother of Israel/Jacob) and Midian is also brother to Isaac and Ishmael, median is from 3rd wife of Abraham. Midian traded with his nephews Esau which is also called Edom, Midian was in south of Edom at that time. Midian was the northmost of the later kingdom called Hijaz, then they rename south of Hijaz the name Midian, current day Midian far from the original north of Hijaz the original Midian country which is south of Edom, North East of Sinai Peninsula not in current day west Saudi. Edom was just south of Canaan which Israel country. So the real Mt Sanai would be southwest of SouthEdom(original Midian is part of Edom that Nabateans trader that built Petra erased south of Edom Midian, who most likely fled south to Saudi and built Hijaz kingdom later).
Wait..... you can't carbon date rock, two reasons: 1) unless they are from lava, they are WAY past the 50K year limit when this technique is effective 2) but forget all that, they had to have been alive at one point to have the cardon 14 they base this testing on. So when they talk about carbon dating a rock alter to be 7K years old.....it makes no sense.
One thing you failed to realize, they were on the run from Egypt, I am sure they were pushed to travel farther than the normal distance in a day...remember God gave them strength and also preserved them, even their shoes and clothes didn't wear out, so your search is going to be futile because you are only going on what man can do on his own, not with the power of God to give them strength and ability. I believe Ron Watt's find is more accurate...he found the wells, the cows etched in rock, the split rock the relics on the bottom of sea, he proved it with lots more evidence than you show, remember the pillars erected on the opposite shores of the Red Sea? Yes study the scriptures, but remember God is God and He can do the impossible. You think as mortal man thinks, try thinking beyond your mortal learning.
I watched Ron’s videos and no offense they were not logical at all, and he was kind of weird thinking the angels have talked to him
@@rania.f6421 , Mount Sinai is actually in Saudi Arabia
Dear @@sajeedsaji1742 ,
There is no evidence that Mt Sinai is in "Saudi Arabia". Some people have claimed this based on their misunderstanding of Ἀραβία in Gal. 4:25 combined with their misunderstanding of 1st century geography of the Biblical lands. Mt Sinai is somewhere on the Sinai Peninsula (Imagine Mt. Sinai, on the Sinai peninsula, who would have thought that !), which was part of Ἀραβία in the 1 Century. Some people even naively propose the Sinai Peninsula was a part of Egypt in the 15th cen. B.C. contrary to establish evidence.
Using the Scriptural data, it appears Associates for Biblical Research has located the location of Mt. Sinai. There are some interesting indicators but the site have never been excavated.
Be Well
DZ
When the Lord is with you none can defeat you. Even in the desert
Dear Dayle Calton
Just what objective, evidential, support did Wyatt ever present for his "discoveries" ?
Be Well,
DZ
Literally can't get enough of this show
Ron Wyatt prove that already many years ago
That Plateau is just perfect for landing the Extraterrestrial Spaceship! 👽🛸
Love the commercials, but they keep getting interrupted every 3 minutes by an archeological show.
Billy Batson buy you some c ds
very funny and very apt. Who puts the commercials on? Is it youtube or the person that does the show? Kevin Lakes's sasquatch show is 20 minutes long and has about 3 or 4 commercials. Does the youtuber get money for showing the commercials, and more money for more commercials?
Someone gave me a tip few days ago. Fast forward and then press replay and you'll be advert free.
Hahaha!
I bought RUclips Premium, never going back.
after reading the comments it looks like everyone knows where it is but Simcha LOL try Jabel AL Laws
Jabal al-Lawz (the Mountain of Almonds). and Jabal Maqla (the Burned Mountain). There you find the Midianites stories about Moses. His well, where he met one of the daughters of Jethro the priest of the Midianites and everything else mentioned in the Bible. But you will find nothing on the Sinai Peninsula because the Israelites never lived there for 40 years. And it was always Egyptian territory with mining and military presence going on. Not so Midian in north west Saudi-Arabia.
Its in the west of arabia.
The real Sinai is in Saudi Arabia You try to put earthly spins on Gods word we can tell you do not have faith
exactly, he knows this but isnt allowed to film there so he wouldnt have had an episode. Just about all of his shows are full of deceptive slight lies to get to his conclusion.
He deceives us like the rest.
80% b.s 20% truth.
@@travissk5036 yeah I really like that he gets outside the bubble with what hes trying to present, but then does the lie to forge an opinion thing, very irritating
Islam is false abrahamic religion! Moron!
If you watched the entire video, you'd find out that you are wrong and he is right.
My sinai is in Saudi Arabia. Its got a black top, a cave 3 quarter the way up and at the bottom is the rock that got split by lightning and a spring from the base it also has a stone bull/cow and a flat rock table
It's also called by locals as mosses moutain
Make it make sense.
How far would all of the people have to travel each day to make it there in the time that the Bible says? Is that travel time realistic?. Is it within the distance the Bible describes in relation to other cities the Bible mentions?
So he appeared in two different places perhaps he was on tour.
This guy used to be a serious archaeologist don't know what happened to him
lighthouse Ministries ......... maybe money. Oh no way.
He had a serious sunstroke and never recovered.
@Steve Whalley He doesn't even seem to know what naked means!
Wyatt was never a serious archaeologist, thought he did claim to be, but Wyatt did make money speaking about his "discoveries". At least this guy in the video is trying to use the Scriptures to locate Mt. Sinai.
Be well DZ
He's never been a serious archaeologist. Per Wikipedia, he is an investigative journalist, author, and filmmaker.
Simcha, Ipuwer's account of The Slaves and Evildoers leaving Egypt (Firmly dated to 1615- 1613 B.C. by the eruption of The Greek Island of Thera/Santorini), details the entire account. What the Egyptians called The Destroyer is back right now, you mite see it in the morning skies, or at Sunset as a Red Ball near our Sun.
Dendro chronology of tree rings estimate the date of Thera (Santorini) major eruption to around 1560 BC altho there was a smaller Thera eruption around 1610 BC ~ 1630 BC according to radiocarbon 14 dates.
it's in Saudi, jabal al lawz
Yes it is
try to remember contantine's mother declared the spot ,the spot in the Bible, also this was the very edge of the empire it did not extend into arabia. mt. Sini was an active volcano. does the place look like it? no. the tablets where made out of black stone, not found on this mountain but it is found in saudi and there is more evidence found in saudi.
@@123cappadocia
Where did you get this information?
@@123cappadocia
Constantine's mother???
I got it from oil workers through Canadian bridge and iron. My late uncle Ralph worked for them. strike maps of Saudi Arabia. film the oil workers took. right now there is a fence around the Mt in Saudi. My Uncle saw the the mountain and walked it. he saw the alters, blood channels, he saw the split rock and where the cave is located. and the foot prints left on the stones.
Mount Sinai is in Saudi Arabia, next to Median, and it is called Jabal al-Lawz or Jabal Musa as it is common among residents
I'm quite inclined to agree with you. The area has a number of Hebrew inscriptions from what I assume to be pilgrims to the holy mountain.
I also believe that the mountain described in the Book of Exodus was sacred to Jethro, the Priest of Midion.
@@robsirois1083
Arab inscriptions and its inhabitants are Arabs and are sanctified by the Arabs, and Jether is an Arab and this is the land of his Arab descendants.. The Hebrews are only wanderers
Yep. No doubt about it. Jabl Musa
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me.
Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point !
So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez !
Thinking logically:
Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib.
18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore.
19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah.
Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern !
The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah.
This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points.
The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity.
i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites !
On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel.
The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham.
After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place.
The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done !
It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.
The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
The path of the Exodus as follows: Rameses ----> Succoth (Exodus 12:37) ------> towards the Red Sea --------> by way of the desert road -(Exodus 13: 17-18)------->Etham (near the edge of the desert, Exodus 13: 20) ---------> Pihahiroth (between Migdol and the sea in front of Baal-zephon, Exodus 14:2 & 9) ------------> crossing the Red Sea (Exodus 14:22) --------->-Marah ---->Elim ( in Arabia, Exodus 15: 27) --------------> Desert of Sin (Ex. 16:1)------------------>Rephidim (Ex. 17:1) ---------------> Sinai (Ex.19:1, in Arabia according to Paul in Gal. 4:24-25)
Clearly, there must be a crossing of the Red Sea from the Sinai Peninsula to Arabia through the Gulf of Aqaba (part of the Red Sea) for the Israelites to get the shortest route to Mt. Sinai where God appeared to Moses on a burning bush and to where God said Moses would bring the people to worship him. There is only one beach in Sinai Peninsula overlooking the Arabian Peninsula by way of the Red Sea, that can accommodate millions of people. That is the Nuweiba Beach.
There is an undersea pathway from Nuweiba Beach to the other side. All other pathways along the Gulf of Aqaba are too deep for the Israelites to pass through without the waters.
The remains of the Egyptian chariots, like the wheels can be found scattered undersea near the Nuweiba Beach and the opposite beach in Arabia, presumably Baal-zephon.
The crossing of the Red Sea could not be from Egypt Proper to the Sinai Peninsula since that would mean crossing the Suez Canal. That would be unnecessary since there is the main road called the "Way of the Philistine" where Abraham, Joseph and his brothers and Jacob and later on Mary and Joseph and Jesus (while escaping from Herod) passed through going to and from Egypt. While initially that main road can be used to cross the Sinai peninsula from Egypt Proper, nonetheless, God diverted their path from that main road to avoid encountering and making battle with the Philistines by proceeding towards the Red Sea by way of the long desert road of the Sinai Peninsula until they reach the end of the desert road and to a large beach between the mountains and the red sea and in front of Baal-zephon which is opposite, by the sea, in the North West portion of the Arabian Peninsula. That is the Nuweiba Beach.
The biblical proof that indeed the Nuweiba Beach is Pi-hahiroth where the Israelites where trapped between the mountains of Migdol and the sea is Exodus 14:10
10 And when Pharaoh drew nigh, the children of Israel lifted up their eyes, and, behold, the Egyptians marched after them; and they were sore afraid: and the children of Israel cried out unto the Lord.
The verse says, "the children of Israel LIFTED UP THEIR EYES. This means they are in a lower elevation from where the Egyptian troops are coming in pursuit of them.
Looking at satellite map the pathway going to Nuweiba Beach is a mountainous area and the people had to descend to go to Nuweiba Beach.
You are correct about the crossing site. But, the Suez Canal was carved out in the 1800s. A.D.
One thing to consider is: humans 2000 years ago had a stronger bone structure, probably 30% more brain mass. People 3500 years ago were totally superior to us. The people begore the Big Flood Super humans comparef with us. Most of us would collapse death, even at a age of 20 marching to the desert with the Israelites. We modern humans are to weak. Moses was 80 years old and died with 120, like his siblings. Just look at thw age of Abraham, Isaak and the people before. Strong, very healthy, unbelievable long life spans.
Evolution theory is a satanic lie, the opposite is true. The human race, thos world are dying, falling apart. Mutations mean to 99.99%
a loss of information, we arr getting weaker, and weaker and dumber.
Based on skull measurements, the human brain appears to have been shrinking over the last 5,000 or so years.
@@magistradox39 Sorry to burst your bubble but if the human brain appears to have been shrinking over a long period it's called evolution....or in this case (devolution)
@@evertjan9479 There is no Evolution (the theory of Evolution). Devolution exists. There is a book in my possession: Genetic Entropy by John C. Sanford. What gives a good case for it.
@@magistradox39 Thank you for the suggestion, I'll certainly find that and read it.
Viewers need to review Ryan Mauro's work, and others concerning the location of Mt Sinai in Saudi Arabia, near the Valley of Jethro, Moses' father in law
Jethro Bodine
I have been there. Definatly Saudi is the one
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me.
Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point !
So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez !
Thinking logically:
Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib.
18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore.
19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah.
Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern !
The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah.
This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points.
The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity.
i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites !
On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel.
The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham.
After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place.
The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done !
It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.
The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
Need to search Jabal Al Lawz if you are a real researcher.
everybody claiming ron wyatts work .. Jabal Al Lawz, Im guessing you know of Ron wyatts work and the caldwells..
Rassa Eyeswideopen Whelan no but I’m gonna check it out. Is it good?
@@Bradmhj yes very
Forget what the video title is but he presents his findings for an hour or so .. Worth a watch ..
the full presentation video where he discusses all his discoveries is the best one, from sinai to sodom, exodus etc
Ron Wyatt found it in Saudi Arabia........jabel Al laws......
It's hard to believe Ron Wyatt and his wife doesn't even believe him he has no proof no evidence
@@salbigelow3118 bullshit, watch his videos, you can see it for yourself, No proof hahahaha What are you talking about ?????
Filbert Odeerani ...yeah I seen where Ron Wyatt found it in Saudi Arabia. It appeared to be very compelling considering that I had heard that this part of Saudi in ancient times was actually considered to be part of Sinai, Egypt. This mount even was blackened on the top which corroborates the account of God’s fiery presence on the mountain top. I don’t remember now but I think there were several other things discovered there that isolated that particular mountain from all the others as they true Mount Sinai. The Saudi authorities also had fenced this mountain in to prevent close exploration so as not to give any credence to the Bible.
@@chriswood3370 Hes not an archeologist all the claims that he put forth there's no proof no evidence hes a nut case and his wife doesn't even believe him he tells you that out of his own mouth There's no paper trail to his claims only word-of-mouth
@@salbigelow3118 there is video you can see and judge for yourself.
Why is it important that the mountain must have been holy before Moses? Do you get that from the Bible?
Yes.
That mountain located in Saudi Arabia
I think this is an exaggerated advertisement for Middle Eastern restaurants instead of a serious expedition.
Either that or he got funding to try out local cuisine with the excuse of looking for Mt. Sinai.
There is no evidence of anything specifically relating to Mount Sinai around this mountain, like Elijah's Cave for example. What a waste of time.
Ron Wyatt already found Mt Sinai ... in Midian Saudi Arabia.
Kiwi Lady NZ Reactions Filbert Odeerani who told you that he found, there are many people since 70’s/80,s who already explored, check my video as well
"The bible says it's within the land of the midianites... but those are in saudi arabia, not the sinai peninsula, so we won't be looking there." 4:00
Well, you're not going to find mount sinai then, are ya?
Yeah im not convinced at all
@@googleuser8448 Jabal al Lawz is the true sight. It was Ron Wyatt who discovered it in the late 70s. The family who followed up next was Jim and Penny Caldwell. The photos and evidence they brought out of Saudi are very compelling. Another very compelling source was Dr. Kim who was the personal physician of a Saudi prince who went in there under an authorization from the Saudi family. All the findings line up perfectly with the Bible. (which is why so many refute it) Check out the different testimonies... the evidence is strong.
Jim A i checked it out and it blew my mind!
@@googleuser8448 It is stated in the Bible that Moses went to a place called Midian. Well, lo and behold! Midian is STILL the name of the place found in the sleepy town of Al Bad in the province of Tabuk in Saudi Arabia. In fact, Jethro's tomb (Moses' father-in-law) is found there and is open for tourists. And all those spots (Mt. Sinai, golden calf altar, Red Sea crossing, split rock at Horeb, Elim, etc.) are just a few kilometers aways, all within Tabuk area.
I don't know how i got here... but i scrolled the comments and then decided i couldn't watch the video... Ron Wyatt already found Mt. Sinai in Saudi Arabia.
Ron Wyatt was a gold digger ... I followed some of his shtick and found him not to be credible!
"Ron Wyatt already found Mt. Sinai in Saudi Arabia." What - Jabal al-Lawz Really ?
This video tries to identify the location of Sinai using the Scriptural descriptions.
Example - Jabal al-Lawz is not 11 days journey from Kadesh Barnea (unless you move Kadesh Barnea a hundred miles)
Wyatt's line of thinking - how could Mt. Sinai be on the Sinai Peninsula ? Who could come up with that idea, especially when there is a bigger mountains somewhere else. Lets chose Jabal al-Lawz, because this mountain has lots of petroglyphs in the area and it doesn't matter if the petroglyphs are much older or much younger than Moses.
I understand how people will fall for Wyatt's stories but there is no explanation why any scholarly minded person would find Wyatt's "discoveries" reliable.
Be Well
DZ
@@Silverheart1956 Sounds like you cut through Ron Wyatt's b. s. too! Initially I was fascinated in his "stories" then somethings just did add up!
@@Silverheart1956 how do you know that the Scripture isn't flawed? scripture is not an ORAL tradition like the Quran is... it is passed down over centuries by MAN, who has personal agendas, can be easily influenced by money, power, fame, women, the devil... how do you know that the men who transcribed the scripture weren't influenced? you don't even have a chain of transmission for the "scripture". WHO transmitted WHAT to who? Do you know? Look at the evidence first... what does the evidence say? Nobody can be 100% sure where Mt. Sinai is... BUT... all the physical evidence, points to Saudi Arabia. It is more reasonable and logical to believe that Mt. Sinai is in Saudi Arabia.
@@Silverheart1956- I thought Sinai was Jabal Maqla….(translates to burnt mountain)…I’m going to read more….
The easy walking speed of a person is approx. 4 km/h. A brisk walk is 5.5 km/h. Depending on how many hours are considered to be a 'day', and allowing for at least one hour for rest breaks, a person could cover approx. 28 kms in and eight hour day, or approx. 35 kms at a brisk pace. The nearest city is 32 kms from where I live, and I have covered that in six hours several times.
For a weak, degenerated (because of mutations = loss of information in the DNA) modern human being. Ancient people were stronger, had more brain, bone and muscle mass.
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me.
Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point !
So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez !
Thinking logically:
Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib.
18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore.
19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah.
Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern !
The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah.
This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points.
The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity.
i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites !
On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel.
The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham.
After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place.
The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done !
It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.
The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
I used to watch this show when it came on and really enjoyed it. Looking back now after watching some of the videos on RUclips, I'm wondering why.
There's an area in Yemen also known as Midian.
Moses had goats/sheep with him bt he was not on a grazing trip. His family was with him & they were returning to Egypt.
So Simcha,. Why have you not followed this up? This is huge! Id buy a ticket and visit. There are so few places as historically significant as this! Truly, and I'm not religious but love history, and if something can be pinpointed, I'd pay to experience it!
This is not the mountain, its not even burned at the top.
Scripture says Mt. Sinai was burnt at the Top ? Where
Jebel al-lawz is not burnt at the top. There are many mountains in Saudia Arabia that are dark on top. it's rather typical to the mountains in that area.
You can even see this on Google maps. compare jebel al-lawz with other mountains around there.
Be Well,
DZ
@@Silverheart1956 Precisely that is the point, the Bible says that God descended to the mountain in fire like a furnace, it does not say that the top got burned, however by the previous explanation not only Mt Sinai's top got burned, but the other surrounding mountains as well. It is a strong possibility.
@@Gavriel-og6jv All subjecture, all stated without a scrap of verifiable evidence & all stated on a subject, that is beyond ridiculous & based on religious delusion! No deities exist, All Manmade fictional belief!
It is almost as if this guy was paid to shore up the idea that the real Mt. SInai is located in the Sinai peninsula. Trying to keep merchandise sales up at the gift shop at the one that Constantine's mother supposedly picked. There is nothing at the Sinai Peninsula location that would indicate that it was the mountain that Moses met with God. That this guy didn't bother to see what where the Bible says it was located, leads me to believe that he just threw some stuff together and took his check. I do not think that this was a serious effort by this famous archeologist. Galatians says that Mt. Sinai is in Arabia, that was during Paul's Era, maybe Midian no longer was a separate country from Arabia by then but It doesn't get any clearer than that.
@@JamesJames-nr5rl totally agree, its like they ignore the bible as history documented. I don’t think or understand how accurate the bible is. When the word of God is so accurate that every 50th letter spells out Gods name. What are the odds. This guy used goats as a marker. No one is that stupid. Your right he’s appealing to who will buy his snake oil. Its sad really.
I miss this show...love it.
Ask yourself, why does the Saudi government refuse archeologists to examine the area of Gabal al laws.
same reason no one is allowed in area 51
Walter Ulasinksi so right, this guy got it wrong. This one isnt even burned at the top.
But they do.. And they have.
It's fake!
Spidey proof?
Maybe this guy needs to read his Holy scrolls .
I agree. Terrible.
@20:00 Ohhhh delicious food.
But naked of facts..
Mount Sinai has been located in Saudi Arabia. There's a mountain peak charred as though it's been burnt
it's actually Jabal Musa, which om the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt
@@PeterGrenader nope. There is zero evidence at that site of it being the real mt Sinai. The jabal al lawz site has all the physical evidence. That’s where mt Sinai was.
Ron Wyatt's discovery of Mount Sinai has all of the indicators that it is the correct site. If I remember correctly, the locals believe that it is Mount Sinai, and it is confirmed by the government of Sudan.
@@johnhenthorne1588 yes you’re right but one thing I will say....I never care at all what locals say or the government. That’s how “traditions” get started...and traditions are not reliable. As a matter of fact, governments can be way off. I want to see hard evidence. That’s always what I look for. Wyatts discovery has all the evidence so yes, that’s Sinai
Jabal Musa is the real Mount Sinai. The Bible list nineteen geographic locations to identify it being that mountain. But sadly not even Ron Wyatt has read and studied the Bible enough to acknowledge it.
If any of you need proof of this being so, then go read where Jezebel ordered a later Prophet of God to be put to death. This Prophet went into hiding at Mount Sanai Moses mountain also.
When you find these verses read them and it gives you the exact location and why i say nobody studies the Bible enough to know.
This is definitely not the site. What in d world do you think you are doing?
I love how the woman in the intro is either just your wife or a staff member you roped into doing it. You didn't even bother actually hiring a dancer to do it.
In the mid1990's, I worked in Northern Sinai with Egyptian Desert Research Center, and a team of experienced Professors of Geology and their graduate students. My Boston University Ph.D. Thesis showed the origin of the springs at Kadesh Barnae in bedrock fractures that intersect wadis. I visited this place and studied it in detail, observing ground water upwelling.
There is a set of anticlines, prominent in the northern quarter of Sinai, trending northeast-southwest. One of these structures is named Gebel Halal (Holy Mountain). One of the Professors told me that this is the place where Moses (who, in my opinion, was likely a composite mythical character) allegedly received the Ten Commandments. The Egyptian name suggests that it has long been called by that designation, i.e., a Holy Place.
Kadesh is Petra. You can't get to the Kadesh-Barnae on some incorrect maps in 11 days travel by foot via the Mt. Sier road from Jebel Lawz. You can make it to Petra however.
Why is it a composite?
Wow! How interesting!
@@501Mobiusthe cIaim that Kadesh Barnea is Petra was made from Flavius Josephus, but he is wrong. Josephus also claimed that one of the paradise rivers is the ganges (india), which is incorrect
@@xXJonnyJamboXx Ain Qadeis is only thought to be Kadesh Barnea because of 19th Century explorers. They ignored things that should have disqualified those springs.
This mountain meets all of your criteria. But it does not have a cave where Elijah could have camped. It also does not have the carvings that exists at the base of the mountain found by the anesthesiologist, Ron Wyatt. I find Ron Wyatt's mountain more believable especially since the locals know that it is Mount Sinai.
That mountain Ron Wyatt claims is Sinai is likely too far, and doesn't line up with other ancient cities the Bible claimed to be near.
The late Ron Wyatt and other explorers have already filmed the real Mt Sinai for you, Mr Naked of any facts.
Yeah, while I like this guys videos... he seems like a 25 cent archeologist to me... with all the silly modern videos thrown in for no reason at all...
@@Grillenheimer He's just another one of those dime a dozen idiots.
The finding of Mt. Sinai in Saudi Arabia tells us that YHWH is God of Moses and not allah.
Au contraire!
It tells that Allah = Yahwe
Listen ... only God matter . .. Abraham = Isaac = Jacob = Ismail ...
@@Berter007 YAHWEH is not ALLAH
Proof Jesus Christ is not Muslim.
1) Jesus invites us to be sons of God. Islam invites people to be slaves of allah.
2) Jesus taught us the Our Father. Islam does not beleive addressing allah "father" because Islam make slaves of allah not sons of allah.
3) Jesus practice the sabbath on Jewish Temple. Muhammad broke the law.
4) Jesus taught us to love our enemies. Islam and Muhammad taught to keep hatred in the hearts against enemies.
5) Jesus is against polygamy. Muhammad practiced polygamy and even permitted sex slaves.
6) Jesus did not own and encourage slavery of another person. Muhammad encourage slave trade and sex slavery and all forms of slavery.
Islam is fraud!
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
So this place that holds thousands as he put it is two small in that there were over 2 million people plus goats sheep herds and cattle. I think this needs a rethink.
@ReligionlessFAITH Talking Bible only. Exo 12:37 And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot that were men, beside children. Exo 12:38 And a mixed multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, even very much cattle. So being generous. If you give each foot man a wife and just one child. That's 1 million 800,000.
@ReligionlessFAITH They were in bondage 430 years before leaving Egypt. Exo 12:40 Now the sojourning of the children of Israel, who dwelt in Egypt, was four hundred and thirty years.
Exo 12:41 And it came to pass at the end of the four hundred and thirty years, even the selfsame day it came to pass, that all the hosts of the LORD went out from the land of Egypt. When they began this time there were 66 Male decedents born that walked in with Jacob. That means Jacob already had 54 Grandchildren that were male. That's 4.5 children per one one of the original males. These 54 Grandchildren If I remember 4 of these Children were great grandchildren and the rest still had children to go. Lets give a generation before having children 40 years. That gives you 10 generations. In 10 generations with the average of .3 children that is 3,188,646
@ReligionlessFAITH This is just were I wanted to get to. This show is looking at Archaeology evidence for where a biblical event happened using the bible. With that said it's impossible if one does not believe in the the bible to prove where an event happened at if they themselves do not believe in the narrative itself. Clearly the bible itself says they were in bondage. Your claim is you don't believe it and we are not talking biblical narrative we are only really talking outside evidence really. Best to you and your family. And by the way if the Nephiliim are fallen angels then only the human part could be destroyed therefore the fallen angel part could happen again. Since angels even fallen are not destroyed till the end.
@Chris Sardelis Have you considered the vast amount of time that has passed and the difference in the terrain? There is evidence to this. Was the route you spoke about even in existence at that time considering the change in terrain? Here is another question did God have a purpose for not going the shortest route which is the question we ask when looking at the bible. What was the route taken in scripture? You say there would certainly be evidence of such a vast amount of people. So by science how is this proven.? It certainly cannot be by human remains. That would be impossible? Look it up for yourself the decomposing of remains in an aired environment. So what evidence are you speaking of after thousands of years? The bible makes it clear that the possessions were continually carried with the people including all the artifacts carried out of Egypt. As for the food they ate? Manna and quail. Again bones decompose. There would be no evidence to find. As far as evidence goes it would be does the places mention exist? That is the best your going to get. What do you have?
@Chris Sardelis You do realize that 5 million people attended Cubs World Series celebration in a single day they went to the event and back home in one day. The parade route was a mere 6 miles. There was no injuries. Of course they drove to the event but still had to walk to the positions on the parade route. That's 5 million that came in and left in a single day in a very small area. We are not talking square miles here we are talking sidewalks and streets hemmed in by buildings. These people came and went on foot. In Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport every day in this less then half mile building if you average on the on day over the year 300,000 plus employees come and go per day and that is just the ones counted that fly. Don't forget many of the family members go in to see them off. It's only a half mile. Can 2 million leave Egypt on foot in one day. Why yes it would be quite possible. Now to your question. First I did not mention that trade routes did not exits although it could be interpreted that way. I was stating that this shorted route may be longer then you calculated considering the change of terrain. But to me that is a non point. I asked you to look at the story of why they did not go the shortest route not that there was not a shorter route. I was hoping you would look at the scriptures of why they did not and the events associated with it and the path taken according to scripture. That is 3 books that you want others to condense down to one event. Here is the short answer to your question. Moses being directed was the leader but God was the one calling the shots. He said lead them this way and I will show them the way by a pillar of fire by night and a cloud by day. Your answer is in the heart of God there was no intent to lead them from point A to point B directly. And there was a purpose in his heart to rid the people he was leading from the beliefs they had acquired in Egypt itself. Thus the wondering around for years. He was leading them to something. And in the story part of the answer is land. 40 years of wandering for land? No it clearly states he was waiting for a people that would believe and that the generation before would die before this would happen because of unbelief in what was promised. This is the short answer. More importantly these same books have hidden in them the proclamation that Christ world come and what he would do. Again to those who would one day believe. That is the reason why because God was raising up something not just in that generation but in a further generation. Call it hogwash call it what ever you will. But the reason your friends don't change their point of view is because they have something in their spirits that they know is true and will one day come to see. Same as these people wondering around in a desert that God was simply teaching to believe in a promise. My personal conclusion is I have seen many people wonder around and face many things without finding any reason for it with absolutely no belief in anything including other fellow humans. Can you wonder in a desert for 40 years and die without hope? Certainly and that is what this story is all about. Hope or no hope.
Sinai used to be called Midian, it was the wilderness Moses took his people to escape Egypt as Ramses chased them through the mountains to the Gulf of Aqaba where they crossed from Wasit and Nuweibaa into Saudi Arabia and hooked around through Jordan. You can look at it on Google Earth.
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me.
Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point !
So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez !
Thinking logically:
Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib.
18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore.
19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah.
Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern !
The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah.
This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points.
The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity.
i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites !
On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel.
The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham.
After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place.
The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done !
It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.
The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
I think one of the BIG problems here, is that the constant marker of 'Elim' and the '2-week travel time by a large group'. See, from all appearances, it is not Elim that is the 'route' marker, but Eliat (northern tip of the Gulf of Aqaba)...which then places you within 100-miles (2-weeks) from Jabal-al-Lawz, which is Mt. Sinai (in Saudi Arabia, near Midionite territory)...and the back-up verification of this is that the 'stone which Moses split with his staff...for water' is only a few miles NW of Jabal-al-Lawz...which Ron Wyatt did all the work on, anyway. ALL THIS is guarded in Saudi, anyhow...
No. Elim is where Nakhl or El-Thamad is.
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me.
Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point !
So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez !
Thinking logically:
Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib.
18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore.
19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah.
Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern !
The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah.
This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points.
The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity.
i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites !
On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel.
The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham.
After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place.
The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done !
It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.
The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
What are your thoughts on the latest discoveries, evidence, and ancient stories that Mt. Sanai is actually located in modern day Saudi Arabia, and not Egypt???
IT,S IN THE BIBLE , I DON,T UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE ARE LOOKING ALL OVER THE PLACE, IT,S IN ARABIA, BIBLICAL SPEAKING THERE IS NO SAUDI ARABIA NOR IN THE KORAN, ONLY ARABIA, BY CALLING THAT NAME PUTS THEM IN THE BIBLICAL BRACKET, WHEN TALKING SECULAR YOU USE THE NAME ,BIBLICAL STRICTLY ARABIA
@@sentinal2343 It is stated in the Bible that Moses went to a place called Midian. Well, lo and behold! Midian is STILL the name of the place found in the sleepy town of Al Bad in the province of Tabuk in Saudi Arabia. In fact, Jethro's tomb (Moses' father-in-law) is found there and is open for tourists. And all those spots (Mt. Sinai, golden calf altar, Red Sea crossing, split rock at Horeb, Elim, etc.) are just a few kilometers from there.
@@symph2000 WE know what's you point? Before you respond understand there's NO saudi in ARABIA in this context, pls don,t waste my time with trivial stats, i.ll take your silence as acknowledgement you don,t really know what you squawking about ,like the parrot you are, pitiful!
@@sentinal2343 My point is that the places stated in the Bible during Moses time exist in Saudi Arabia. You have BIG problem in comprehension!
@@symph2000 show me SAUDI in the bible jackass
That second mountain they go to is Hashem El Tarif. Which actually is the Mt. Sin that the Wilderness of Sin is named after. Some 25 more miles toward Midian along the Way of the Wilderness is Taba Beach on the Gulf of Aqaba where the quail came ashore.
The name seems kind of appropriate if it were Hebrew
But since it's Arabic it means something quite different
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me.
Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point !
So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez !
Thinking logically:
Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib.
18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore.
19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah.
Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern !
The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah.
This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points.
The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity.
i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites !
On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel.
The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham.
After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place.
The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done !
It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.
The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
This is not Mt.Sinai.Mt.Sinai is in Arabia even the Bible says that! It is mountain known was Jabal El Laws or the Mountain of God's Laws. This is in Midian in western Arabia on the western coast of Arabia, on the east coast of the eastern arm of the Red Sea. There is a plain on the western side that is the only place suitable didn't the people to be called before the crossing of the Red Sea or Yam Suph.
You work with what you have. I recall that this episode was first aired many years ago. Today, there might still be a candidate in the Sinai Peninsula, but I believe the Saudi site has more evidence to back it up. As the Mt. Sinai search shows, places are not always where we think they are. We don't know their starting points (not mentioned in the Bible), and place names can change. Another episode deals with the possible Red Sea Crossing site at Nuweibaa, making the Saudi site more plausible, including the split rock water source, site of the Midianites, Desert of Sin, Cave of Ezra(?), and much more.
Didn't Ron Wyatt find Mt Siani?
@@eviemack6138 I understand he found one of the candidates for Biblical Mount Sinai, but I don't recall which one. I think the one in Saudi has the most evidence in favor, since the site has everything described in the Bible, including being burned, the split rock that gave water, 12 markers (stones), and much more. Also, it fits with where Midian is, etc.
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me.
Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point !
So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez !
Thinking logically:
Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib.
18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore.
19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah.
Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern !
The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah.
This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points.
The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity.
i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites !
On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel.
The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham.
After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place.
The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done !
It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.
The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
@@Michael-pn5lp All interpretations must start with assumptions. It appears you (and I) may be assuming different starting points, and even different amounts of God's miracle involvement. For me, I believe that the preponderance of evidence best matches what I described in my original post - Occam's Razor.
@@HunterChristianDarkman The Gulf of Suez extended further north in antiquity - it's been mapped out well into the fresh water marshy lake reed area that drained into it.
Proving the three day journey to the crossing point, the fourth day crossing during the night and celebration on the opposite shore for the rest of the fourth day:
Proving the Exodus Gulf of Suez Crossing:
“And they departed from Rameses in the first month, on the fifteenth day of the first month; on the morrow after the passover the children of Israel went out with an high hand (“from Rameses”) in the sight of all the Egyptians.” (Numbers 33:3)
For THREE DAYS they travelled into the wilderness, well within reach of
Pharaoh’s army:
The 15th Abib therefore was not then and is not now a weekly Sabbath day.
1st day
2nd day
3rd day
The 15th Abib they all travelled and camped at Succoth (see Exodus 12:37).
The 16th Abib they travelled again until afternoon and camped at Etham (see Exodus 13:20). The 17th Abib Yahweh instructed them to turn away from exiting Egypt eastwards above the top end of the Red Sea (Gulf of Suez), and to travel further down the west side within Egypt proper and camp at Pihahiroth (see Exodus 14:2). Only now Pharaoh thought that they were going to actually try and escape Egypt, but had somehow made a wrong turn (see Exodus 14:3-9).
Leaving Egypt was never on Pharaoh’s agenda !
Enclosed here between the desert mountains and the sea, Pharaoh’s spies told him the Israelites were trapped and he personally lead his army in to guarantee their return to bondage.
Starting the 4th day 18th Abib NIGHT Yahweh parted the Red Sea and the
Israelites passed through safely:
“And the angel of God, which went before the camp of Israel, removed and went behind them; and the pillar of the cloud went from before their face, and stood behind them:” (Exodus 14:19).
This “angel of God” was Christ Himself:
“Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;
And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ” (1 Corinthians 10:1-4).
He is our Shepherd - the Stone of Israel - see Genesis 49:24 !
“And Moses STRECHED FORTH HIS HAND OVER THE SEA, and the sea
returned to his strength when the morning appeared; and the Egyptians fled against it; and Yahweh overthrew the Egyptians in the midst of the sea. And the waters returned, and covered the chariots, and the horsemen, and all the host of Pharaoh that came into the sea after them; there remained not so much as one of them.
But the children of Israel walked upon dry land in the midst of the sea; and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left.
THUS Yahweh saved Israel THAT DAY out of the hand of the Egyptians;
and Israel saw the Egyptians dead upon the sea shore.
And Israel saw that great work which Yahweh did upon the Egyptians: and the people feared Yahweh, and believed Yahweh, and his servant Moses” (Exodus 14:27-31).
“Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto Yahweh…
And Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, took a timbrel in her hand; and all the women went out after her with timbrels and with dances.
And Miriam answered them, Sing ye to Yahweh, for he hath triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the sea.” (Exodus 15:1-21).
“And they remembered that God was their rock, and the high God their redeemer . . .
And smote all the firstborn in Egypt; the chief of their strength in the tabernacles of Ham: But made his own people to go forth like sheep, and guided them in the wilderness like a flock. And he led them on safely, so that they feared not: but the sea overwhelmed their enemies.” (Psalms 78:35,51-53)
This 18th was a great “day of gladness”, salvation, celebration and thanksgiving !
This 18th according to the Dead Sea Scrolls solar calendar, was the weekly Sabbath day ! This 18th Sabbath day, Christ our Shepherd/Stone/Rock herded the whole flock of Israel out of the Egyptian pit ! (N.B. see Matthew 12:8-13).
This 18th was the weekly Sabbath day on Yahweh's Heavenly Calendar, and so they would not have travelled any further that day, because they were already out of the Egyptian pit and it was fitting to celebrate and praise Yahweh, as they did for the rest of that day on the opposite shore of the Red Sea !
After three days journey across Egypt to the Red Sea - this 4th day 18th Abib Sabbath day salvation of Israel is also that 18th Abib Sabbath Day Resurrection of Christ - Lord of the Sabbath Day - after three full nights and three full days in the dark tomb:
“He will swallow up death in victory; and the Lord GOD will wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall he take away from off all the earth: for Yahweh hath spoken it.” (Isaiah 25:8)
So Moses and Yahweh didn’t lie - they did travel THREE DAYS into the Egyptian wilderness
to sacrifice, and by the end of the third days travel they encamped at the Red Sea:
That 18th NIGHT starting the 4th day, Pharaoh, his chariots, horses and army were all sacrificed in the Red Sea. Death for Israel was literally swallowed up.
Pharaoh had no idea that he himself and his oppressive army were to be Yahweh’s sacrifice (sacrificial Red Sea slaughter/feast in divine judgment) The Red Sea Gulf of Suez, "tongue of the Egyptian sea", as the Bible calls it, literally swallowed them up and the fowls of the air and monsters of the deep had a great feast !
Now there was no Pharaoh to return to and Israel was free to go !
Mr. Jacobovici : thank you for doing your homework on Mt. Sinai after some many years have passed. ...
Problems, Sinai was part of Egypt. The Red Sea part on the Saudi Arabian side of the peninsula actually had Ancient Egyptian chariot parts found in it. Also a mountain in Saudi Arabia seems to match the biblical description of Mount Sinai.
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me.
Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point !
So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez !
Thinking logically:
Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib.
18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore.
19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah.
Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern !
The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah.
This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points.
The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity.
i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites !
On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel.
The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham.
After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place.
The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done !
It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.
The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
@@Michael-pn5lp Right. Completely ignore the archeological evidence that is at the site in Saudi Arabia that matches the biblical description, including Egyptian chariots under the water, the Hebrew settlement remnants, and mountain matching the description of mount Sinai, including where there was an altar.
I can also drop a lot of artifacts overboard in the Gulf of Aqaba, return two years later when they are full of barnacles and call it 'evidence' - that proves nothing !
Has this 'evidence' been examined and verified by experts ? NO !
Proving the Exodus Gulf of Suez Crossing:
“And they departed from Rameses in the first month, on the fifteenth day of the first month; on the morrow after the passover the children of Israel went out with an high hand (“from Rameses”) in the sight of all the Egyptians.” (Numbers 33:3)
For THREE DAYS they travelled into the wilderness, well within reach of
Pharaoh’s army:
The 15th Abib therefore was not then and is not now a weekly Sabbath day.
1st day
2nd day
3rd day
The 15th Abib they all travelled and camped at Succoth (see Exodus 12:37).
The 16th Abib they travelled again until afternoon and camped at Etham (see Exodus 13:20). The 17th Abib Yahweh instructed them to turn away from exiting Egypt eastwards above the top end of the Red Sea (Gulf of Suez), and to travel further down the west side within Egypt proper and camp at Pihahiroth (see Exodus 14:2). Only now Pharaoh thought that they were going to actually try and escape Egypt, but had somehow made a wrong turn (see Exodus 14:3-9).
Leaving Egypt was never on Pharaoh’s agenda !
Enclosed here between the desert mountains and the sea, Pharaoh’s spies told him the Israelites were trapped and he personally lead his army in to guarantee their return to bondage.
Starting the 4th day 18th Abib NIGHT Yahweh parted the Red Sea and the
Israelites passed through safely:
“And the angel of God, which went before the camp of Israel, removed and went behind them; and the pillar of the cloud went from before their face, and stood behind them:” (Exodus 14:19).
This “angel of God” was Christ Himself:
“Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;
And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ” (1 Corinthians 10:1-4).
He is our Shepherd - the Stone of Israel - see Genesis 49:24 !
“And Moses STRECHED FORTH HIS HAND OVER THE SEA, and the sea
returned to his strength when the morning appeared; and the Egyptians fled against it; and Yahweh overthrew the Egyptians in the midst of the sea. And the waters returned, and covered the chariots, and the horsemen, and all the host of Pharaoh that came into the sea after them; there remained not so much as one of them.
But the children of Israel walked upon dry land in the midst of the sea; and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left.
THUS Yahweh saved Israel THAT DAY out of the hand of the Egyptians;
and Israel saw the Egyptians dead upon the sea shore.
And Israel saw that great work which Yahweh did upon the Egyptians: and the people feared Yahweh, and believed Yahweh, and his servant Moses” (Exodus 14:27-31).
“Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto Yahweh…
And Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, took a timbrel in her hand; and all the women went out after her with timbrels and with dances.
And Miriam answered them, Sing ye to Yahweh, for he hath triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the sea.” (Exodus 15:1-21).
“And they remembered that God was their rock, and the high God their redeemer . . .
And smote all the firstborn in Egypt; the chief of their strength in the tabernacles of Ham: But made his own people to go forth like sheep, and guided them in the wilderness like a flock. And he led them on safely, so that they feared not: but the sea overwhelmed their enemies.” (Psalms 78:35,51-53)
This 18th was a great “day of gladness”, salvation, celebration and thanksgiving !
This 18th according to the Dead Sea Scrolls solar calendar, was the weekly Sabbath day ! This 18th Sabbath day, Christ our Shepherd/Stone/Rock herded the whole flock of Israel out of the Egyptian pit ! (N.B. see Matthew 12:8-13).
This 18th was the weekly Sabbath day on Yahweh's Heavenly Calendar, and so they would not have travelled any further that day, because they were already out of the Egyptian pit and it was fitting to celebrate and praise Yahweh, as they did for the rest of that day on the opposite shore of the Red Sea !
After three days journey across Egypt to the Red Sea - this 4th day 18th Abib Sabbath day salvation of Israel is also that 18th Abib Sabbath Day Resurrection of Christ - Lord of the Sabbath Day - after three full nights and three full days in the dark tomb:
“He will swallow up death in victory; and the Lord GOD will wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall he take away from off all the earth: for Yahweh hath spoken it.” (Isaiah 25:8)
So Moses and Yahweh didn’t lie - they did travel THREE DAYS into the Egyptian wilderness
to sacrifice, and by the end of the third days travel they encamped at the Red Sea:
That 18th NIGHT starting the 4th day, Pharaoh, his chariots, horses and army were all sacrificed in the Red Sea. Death for Israel was literally swallowed up.
Pharaoh had no idea that he himself and his oppressive army were to be Yahweh’s sacrifice (sacrificial Red Sea slaughter/feast in divine judgment) The Red Sea Gulf of Suez, "tongue of the Egyptian sea", as the Bible calls it, literally swallowed them up and the fowls of the air and monsters of the deep had a great feast !
Now there was no Pharaoh to return to and Israel was free to go !
The Great Bitter Lake is also bordered on the west side by desert and mountains 150-200 meters high, and the Gulf of Suez possibly extended into this lake - I no longer have the evidence of it's ancient shoreline. So this scenario is definitely within the THREE day travel limit to the crossing point.
I believe the Bible also mentions a little thing called the Red Sea crossing. That means Saudi Arabia.
Every video I see this man in he looks at the same places the secular scholars have claimed as possible sites for this or that but he doesn't even begin to bring up other places people of faith who are just as credible who have pointed out places like many have said in the comments such as jabal el laws, or in one of this mans videos claiming the pillar of fire and the pillar of smoke was really a far off volcano erupting, but it clearly says that the pillar of fire stopped the Egyptian army from destroying the Israelites while the Israelites were crossing the path made by God. People should be weary when it comes to people saying they have faith but don't match what is written in the bible, let's allow scripture to interpret scripture and as for what others say about this place or that if it doesn't match what is written to the smallest detail then I would say it probably isn't it, God bless you and yours.
I don't know any actual archaeologists who think Wyatt was correct. Watching one RUclips video does not make you an expert. In fact, lots of scholars have looked into the Saudi site, but none of the sites connected to the Jebel al Lawz date to the Late Bronze Age. That's a fact. It's not the real Mount Sinai.
Well, there are a lot of characteristics of that mountain that would fit. It has 12 pillars, a place for animal sacrifice, it has the petroglyphs, a giant altar where the Golden calf could have been. And why in the world is it fenced off and guarded?
@@markzylstra2947 But none of the dates match when the Exodus would have happened. That is critically important. It's like going to Egypt and saying that the early Israelites built the pyramids. That can't possibly be true because the pyramids were built roughly a thousand years beforehand. Some of the "characteristics" date archaeologically to nearly a thousand years *after*. So it doesn't matter at all if they are fenced off. It isn't Sinai.
@@andywitt5860 Good call my friend. I do not understand why people seem so intent on trying to prove that the real Mount Sinai is in any other place than where it's always been believed to be, in Egypt. I mean, if people actually took the time to examine the ALL the clues, then they would see it makes perfect sense. Most people who make this claim; that it's in Arabia because Paul said it was, do not understand that whenever Paul referred to Arabia, he was not talking about the country which was not even established yet, he was talking about the whole entire area. To Jews at that time the whole area was Arabia, and that is also why most people from the area, no matter what specific locale it might've been were always referred to as Arabians. Of course nowadays it's different. Now you call them according to whichever country they are from, Iraqi, Iranian, a Saudi, Kuwaiti, Lebanese and so on. Besides that there are other subtle clues. If you go to the Sinai area you will see a natural formation in the rocks that looks just like a calf, which most experts believe was where the original Israelites got the idea for making the idol. Bedouins who've attempted to stay on the slopes of Mount Sinai overnight, claim that whenever they do they are driven from it's sacred slopes by the frightening noises the wind makes at it screeches and screams thru the peaks and crevices of the holy mount, so that they are forced to flee. There are many other clues as well that the mountain is not in Arabi, one of the most important of which is the one you've already provided. The mountain Ron Wyatt discovered was a featureless mountain top with no peaks, crevices or any other type of areas where Moses might be sheltered from sight as he received the tablets of the law. And that is another thing, Jabel El Lawz does not have any kind of cliff face which the holy tablets might have been formed from in God';s cases or hewn from in Moses' case. It's just one big mountain top that has no distinguishing marks whatsoever. There is another clue as well; a monk or a Bedouin who once dwelt in the area prayed to God that he might forever provide undeniable evidence that the Mount Sinai which he dwelt next to would always have divine proof that it was the real one from the Bible. So one night God struck the entire Mountain so that now...whenever any part of the mountain rock is broken off or broken open, there inside the rock is the sign of the burning bush that Moses first saw. There are many clues as well, but this should suffice to make the people who've commented here see that they are all DEAD WRONG!
Ron Wyatt and his sons did an extensive search and discovered Mt Sinai - Jebel al Lawz , the split rock from where water gushed forth, the twelve altars made of natural stone( no tools used) for the twelve tribes etc. way back in the 80s
Ron Wyatt is Not credible at all. Gtfo
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me.
Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point !
So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez !
Thinking logically:
Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib.
18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore.
19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah.
Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern !
The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah.
This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points.
The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity.
i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites !
On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel.
The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham.
After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place.
The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done !
It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.
The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez.
It was very convincing, but that location is very highly improbable considering the time it would take them to travel, along with the locations the Bible mentions.
Ron Wyatt already found it.
everyones claiming to have found it .. Ron gave all the Glory to God also yet these lot claim the glory for themselves..
Ron was too creative but very no academic researcher, very very sad.
@@cafetorah Your not the best comedian i have heard.
The Late Ron Wyatt was a very Humble man, and was correct
If You actually open your eyes and read the Bible and look at the evidence that is available then You would also see that
But I doubt You will because it is easier to disrespect someone that cannot defend themselves (they died) than it is to look at the evidence available with an open mind and eyes and come to an informed decision through that
First, you would have to prove the bible is true and only then can you make the claim that you found a mountain that a god dictated the 10 commandments to Moses. By the way, while you were there why didn't you look for evidence of the Israelites that moses ordered the slaighter of and the broken tablets that Moses destroyed?
The bible has thousands of Archaeology finds to verify its history
So very interesting!
You're assuming Moses didn't cross the Red Sea ? Your path is your possibilities in path make that clear I'm not sure you have all your information correct maybe you should know where they crossed the Red Sea first?
They didn't cross the Red Sea. The Bible says a sea of reeds. I hate to say this, but "King James only" is wrong. And I use that translation often.
Amazing !!!🤩
MT HOREB has water erosion in a desert that gets 2mm of water a year
I love watching these documentarys
The real Mount Sinai is in Saudi Arabia, the Jabel Al Lawz, and the Red Sea crossing is in Nueva beach. It was discovered by Ron Wyatt and there are some compelling evidences to support his claim such as the twelve stone pillars Moses set up at the foot of the mountain, golden calf images carved on the stones, the split rock, the burnt mountain top, etc. Many may have not believe in him because he's an amateur archaeologist, because his claims have been debunked by professional archeologists, etc. but there are those of us who still believe him through the guidance of the Holy Spirit and by judging of Ron Wyatt's character. His faith is unwavering and stood up into his testimony up to his death.
Too much loud music. Good bye.
is there bush there? you forgot to consider this also
This video is way out of line. Ron Wyatt's findings put the real Mt Sinai in its real place, Joel Richardson has taken it farther in his conclusions.
I LOVE KING 👑 JESUS❤
There were other things in the discription that he didnt add in.
Is this Video about add promotion or finding the actual location of Mt. Sinai ?
wrong mountain the real mountain is surrounded with fences and guards, you had been arrested directly in the holy mountain
out of Egypt---- found it in...Egypt? THis is retarded...
Lmao was interesting til they started talking about carbon dating. These guys should know u can’t date anything! Carbon dating relies on assumptions and is never accurate or consistent
Spot on... Carbon dating is fake science, Carbon dating only tells them what they want to hear, not the facts.
Thank you SYNDICADO TV and most especially to Simcha Jacobovici... you are great! God Bless you!
After the six of us reached the point where we were CLOSE to Mt. Sinai, Egyptian soldiers came from all around us and told us, rather stern words were used, that we could go no further and escorted completely away from the are and told us to not return and if we did, we would be shot.
This video was made in ignorance or maliciousness. You be the judge.
Don Rush His show also discredits the giants of the Bible. IMO, he’s an academic/theological disinfo agent.
🤣😂🤣
Let's go put rocks out in the desert with new sand all around them and call it an archaeological find🤣🤣🤣🤣
Looks like a setup
EXCELLENT OBSERVATION, any new discoveries MUST be treated with skepticism as we know things can easily be reproduced/faked to a high standard which can fool even so called experts, look at Hollywood, don,t the films look authentic
Seriously ????
Abib 15 they took off ....
They arrived According to the Torah ... Ex 19.1 Exo 19:1 And in the third month of the departure of the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt, on the same day, they came into the wilderness of Sinay
47 days ....? Hello do math and study the Torah ...!
16 days of Abib
31 days of second month
Arrived 3 months
Total 47 days simple math
I was worried he wasnt gonna find food lol
Check out Ron Wyatt
Amazing that you kept showing scenes in Israel (like every restaurant) and all your helpers are obviously Israeli but your video never mentions the word "Israel"
Why doea it need too? Lol
This is just a typical MARLBORO commercial 😂😂😂
this show kind of reminds me of that ghost hunter show but with biblical mysteries all the "evidence" is way over hyped to fit the script
Where does it say in the Bible that Mt Sinai has a fresh water spring at the top? can anybody provide book, chapter and verse please?
Amazing information
Why do you say escape....they were delivered from
You can't carbon date Rock
yes Julie you can carbon date rock, petrified wood.
@@willow9530 well that not rock now is it goofy
@@willow9530 sorry to tell you but petrified woods not rock wow
and what would be the point be anyway? You get the age of the rock itself but that does not tell you when the structure was assembled!😏
desperate try to keep the traditional site on top...... lies and you know it
Sinai is in Arabia right where the bible says it is!
I don't think the Bible gives us the coordinates.
it gives a very complex map,, and tells us 70 times Sinai is in Arabia and they had to get out of Egypt
Chick Sage look up the one there and the real crossing. If that doesn’t spit in the face of the lie I don’t know what does. The great deception is afoot.
It seems, to me, that the location of the theophany is not specifically stated. At least, not specifically enough to keep it from becoming a major point of contention among scholars and academics. There isn't even a consensus within the Bible, itself. The name "Sinai" is only used in the Torah by the Yahwist and Priestly source, while "Horeb" is only used by the Elohist and Deuteronomist, and even that is only according to the DH. For what it's worth, I have reviewed evidence and heard case arguments from a few of the different camps, on this subject, and some of them are persuasive but, unfortunately, it seems as though the actual location is still yet to be determined. I'm not ready to sign off on it yet, anyway, but hey, according to my ex-wife, I'm an idiot, so Mt. Sinai could be right where you think it is :)
peace
@@ChickSage Look at the evidence of and at the location in Saudi Arabia at Jabal Al Lawz in all the videos of the area that is readily available on YT and read the Bible verses concerning it and then tell me that You don't know where the Real Mount Sinai is
I believe that the Mount Sinai that Ron Wyatt discovered is more biblical.
It is
the Major flaw you have in this story is we don't know what was considered a days time back then we just assume its 24 hours days could be longer plus they could've traveled at night too
Ya know the funniest thing?
You had a travel visa and wasted it looking in the wrong area...lol
The Real Mt. Sinai has t be in Midian, that is in. Southern Saudi Arabia.
North Western Saudi Arab
ARABIA, ARABIA,ARABIA, NO SAUDI WHEN TALKING SCRIPTURE
Sentinel, the Saud family is ruling over this area at this time.
@@walterulasinksi7031 ARE THEY IN THE BIBLE? NO, STOP ASSOCIATING THEIR NAME WITH ANYTHING BIBLICAL, ARE THEIR NAMES IN THE KORAN OR HADITH,S? NO MODERN IDIOTS HAVE NO IDEA, WHAT WOULD YOUR PROPHET SAY CALLING HIS BELOVED ARABIA SAUDI? THINK ON
Sentinel I suggest you try to do an archeological dig at the site and you will find out who you will have to deal with
You DON'T even know where Elim is!!!!!
So enjoy your channel...informative and interesting with a touch of humour. Thank you so much.
Jabel AL Laws saudi arabia the bedouin tradition says Midian is in the city of Al Bad' saudi arabi, along with the well of Moses
In the NT Sha’ul (Paul) says “Mount Sinai is in Saudi Arabia.” And there are many RUclips videos showing the REAL mount Sinai. It’s awesome!!!
Comparing traveling men in the prime of their lives and/or on camels, to a huge mixed multitude of men, women, children and elderly with flocks and herds of livestock, doesn't seem sensible to me.
Pharaoh and his chariots caught up with them at the Red Sea crossing point in LESS than one day - probably in only a few hours from when the spies reported they were entangled in the land on the wrong side of the Red Sea ! This also establishes a certain travel limit to the crossing point !
So what would take Laurence of Arabia on camels four days to the Gulf of Aqaba crossing point, only took Pharaoh and his chariots a few hours ? That is the clincher ! It could only have been the top of the Gulf of Suez !
Thinking logically:
Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib.
18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore.
19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah.
Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern !
The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah.
This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points.
The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity.
i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites !
On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel.
The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham.
After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place.
The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done !
It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.
The Bible shows that the Israelites got to the Red Sea crossing point in three days walking, and Pharaoh and his chariots got there in less than one day. This is IMPOSSIBLE for any Gulf of Aqaba crossing, but quite plausible for a crossing at the top of the Gulf of Suez
Mt.Sinai is in Saudi Arabia . There is a basalt marker set up in Egypt by King Solomon where the people crossed . Directly across from that marker was another marker in Saudi Arabia that King Solomon set up .The markers were the same The Saudis came and sawed theirs off and took it away . Up the twisted valley away on the Saudi side is a blackened mountain and a now desert plain .The locals tent dwelling arabs that live there now call the mountain Moses's mount . The un-hewn alter is there .The alter where Egyptian style of cattle were carved into it also is there . The split rock is there from where the water flowed is there . Look up some of the Ron Wyatt films - here at YOU TUBE
No. There actually is none of that and Ron Wyatt is a fool.
Very interesting investigations that would be even better teamed up with the findings of the late Ron Wyatt.
Mount Siani is located in Saudi Araiba, where they crossed the Gulf of Aquaba. All the evidence is there. Look up Ron Wyatt you will be shocked at what they found
This is the best video about where Mt Sinai is! Midian was located in Edom at that time and its the Reed Sea that Exodus Hebrews crossed. So the real Mt Sanai is east of the Reed See on the way to the south of Edom, which is Midian at that time! Mt Sinai would be southwest of SouthEdom. Arabian's were from Midian son of 3rd wife of Abraham after Sarai died. Midian was trading neighbor to Edom son of Issac, brother of JoacobIsrael. Midian were close brothers to Ishmael, they are family both close to Edom (Edom=Essau brother of Israel/Jacob) and Midian is also brother to Isaac and Ishmael, median is from 3rd wife of Abraham. Midian traded with his nephews Esau which is also called Edom, Midian was in south of Edom at that time. Midian was the northmost of the later kingdom called Hijaz, then they rename south of Hijaz the name Midian, current day Midian far from the original north of Hijaz the original Midian country which is south of Edom, North East of Sinai Peninsula not in current day west Saudi. Edom was just south of Canaan which Israel country. So the real Mt Sanai would be southwest of SouthEdom(original Midian is part of Edom that Nabateans trader that built Petra erased south of Edom Midian, who most likely fled south to Saudi and built Hijaz kingdom later).
Yall are looking in the wrong land
Wait..... you can't carbon date rock, two reasons: 1) unless they are from lava, they are WAY past the 50K year limit when this technique is effective 2) but forget all that, they had to have been alive at one point to have the cardon 14 they base this testing on. So when they talk about carbon dating a rock alter to be 7K years old.....it makes no sense.
As The Dude said: "That's a bummer man. It's a bummer"
You are GOD sent Sir 🙏
There were around 3 million people who left Mitzrayim.
If _gopher_ could mean "any", as in " _gopher wood_ - any wood", then, maybe, _sinai_ means "uphill" or "somewhere up"...