Eli Shukron: Melchizedek Standing Stone Was Kept Hidden | Living Passages Christian Travel
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- Who was Melchizedek and how could he have been a greater authority than Abraham? According to the Book of Genesis, Melchizedek was a High Priest of God to whom Abraham brought the very first tithe. Where did that happen? Eli Shukron may have discovered the answer.
"We have a standing stone." Says Shukron, talking about the area he calls 'Temple Zero'.
The standing stone in Jerusalem is an ancient place of worship dating back to the Bronze era, which would place the stone in the same period of history as Abraham from the book of Genesis. The location of the standing stone in Jerusalem, and particularly in the City of David, is also significant. As far as archaeologists are aware, there are no other standing stones of this kind in or around Jerusalem, meaning that Temple Zero is likely to be the very place written about in Scripture where Abraham brought Melchizedek the first tithe. In other words, the place of the standing stone, discovered by Eli Shukron, is likely the very first temple of worship ever used in the city of Jerusalem. Making Temple Zero much older than the Dome of the Rock or the Temple of King Solomon.
___
Interested in traveling with Eli Shukron? Want to learn more about Eli Shukron's work?
Check out our Eli Shukron page and view all of Eli Shukron's upcoming tours: livingpassages...
___
Call Our Travel Experts: 1-888-771-8717
Write Us for More Info: info@livingpassages.com
___
Interested in traveling with Living Passages? Check out our website for all our upcoming Christian cruises and Biblical tours!
livingpassages...
___
Christian Tours: livingpassages...
Christian Cruises: livingpassages...
___
Call Our Travel Experts: 1-888-771-8717
Write Us for More Info: info@livingpassages.com
___
Follow Us for Exclusive Updates and Breaking News!
Facebook: / livingpassages
Instagram: / livingpassages
Twitter: / livingpassages
Pinterest: / lpassages
___
Imagine following the footsteps of both Jesus and Paul, watching the Bible come alive with your own eyes, and lodging in exquisite boutique hotels around the world. What if you could cruise the turquoise seas of the Mediterranean, stopping to see sights etched in Biblical history that most people have never heard of outside of Biblical passages? Picture yourself walking among powerful creatures such lions and elephants in South Africa while diving into the Bible’s account of creation. We bring you the top scholars in biblical archaeology and history to educate and inspire you along your journey.
Living Passages is a Christian cruise and Biblical tour company with over 25 years of experience in Christian group travel. We know the ins-and-outs of booking the finest accommodations, offer authentic locations other tour companies don't have access to, and specialize in making your inspirational experience safe and seamless.
Visit our website to find the latest available tours and cruises: livingpassages...
Call us to speak with our travel experts! 1-888-771-8717
#elishukron #livingpassages #christiantours #christiantour #christiancruise #christiancruises #familysafari #mountsinai #saudiarabia #mediterraneancruise #footstepsofpaul #africansafari #Bibletour #Biblicalarcheology #christiantravel #luxurytourism #standingstone #melchizedek
GOD preserved those artifacts☝☝☝🕎🕎✡🌈TO THE MOST HIGH GOD PRAISED
This is the best news. To find this place of worship is sooooo significant. Amazing it still exists.
Wow, this is awesome!
Not that this was not an ancient place of worship, but the meeting itself (with Abraham) most likely took place in the Valley of Shaveh.
Gen 14:17-18 "After his return from the defeat of Chedorlaomer and the kings who were with him, the king of Sodom went out to meet him at the Valley of Shaveh (that is, the King’s Valley).
And Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine. (He was priest of God Most High.)
What Eli Shukron is pointing out is that Melchizedek was not worshipping God in the valley of Shaveh but, instead pointing out why Jacob placed the pillar of stone at Bethel. And Bethel about 10 Miles north of Jerusalem. And Eli is saying that Melchizedek came from Jerusalem to bless Abram.
Great video...but I WISH you had provided footage of the stone alter as well. Thank you for the video and insights :)
This is an enlightening video!! but the hatred, arrogance, and bickering in the comments section below from all involved is disheartening
Thank you for your reply. Differing viewpoints can cause dissonance. We are grateful for those who chose to debate with kindness and respect.
@@LivingPassagesTravel I agree, but I wasn't saying that it's wrong to have a difference of opinion, but i think as adults we can disagree without being disrespectful to each other. Those are the comments that were disheartening.
@@tiffanythomas2237 Yes, agreed! :)
@@tiffanythomas2237 IN this matter, Eli impressed me, he told to the guide politely "I follow you" thoug he didn't shared the same point of view. And when the guy with the bible pointed to the christian scriptures... and talked about the bread and the wine. Eli remained with all due respect silent. I got a great impression of this archeologist
@@LivingPassagesTravel
Hello my friends. Israel in September 28 - October 6 2019 was the best vacation that I have ever had. Jerusalem Waldorf Astoria was the best hotel that I have ever stayed in. Living Passages is the best way to see Israel, or any of the biblical lands.
So, if Melchizedek had his temple here, as Eli Shukron states, in the city of David, WHY would the temple site have been moved to the place which today is called the Temple Mount? Wouldn't Solomon have kept the traditional site for the temple he built in the same place as Melchizedek's temple, and near to the Gihon Spring for the water needed in such temple rituals? Also, if Abraham recognized Melchizedek as an earthly being, why wouldn't he have continued worshiping God there, and why would he build his own altars everywhere he journeyed to as Genesis says he did? Also, we only read of Abraham paying tithe to him ONCE. Melchizedek had to be a Christophany, or one of the many pre-appearances of the Mashiach. Not having genealogy is one thing, but not having father OR mother, but, as Hebrews tells us, He "remains a priest continually" means that this Melchizedek still lives, but NOT as a priest on earth, but as our great high Priest in heaven, just as Abraham recognized Him to be! If the Melchizedek priesthood had neither predecessor nor successor, then Jesus couldn't have succeeded Hi, otherwise the Melchizedek priesthood could not be eternal, but it says in hebrews "of whom it is witnessed that he still lives!"Heb. 7:8- "And here men that die receive tithes; but there he receiveth them, of whom it is witnessed that he still lives." Either there are TWO Melchizedeks, or the one whom we see in Genesis was no earthly Melchizedek, but Yeshua HaMashiach who is the Melchizedek Abraham met and Who "still lives"!
@3:38 - @3:52 that was funny. He just tried to hurry up and say it’s talking about the period of Abraham and Melchizedek. Be diligent brothers. It’s a reason you aren’t finding actual inscriptions.
Can you get on your knees with and grip the stone with your hands? Place your forehead between your hands on the stone and pray to YAHWEH!!! This is similar to what I would build at my house for worship!!!
So the "Temple Zero" was decommissioned in the same way as the holy place of Gobekli Tepi, by burial?
This is for all the ones interested in finding out who Melchisedek really is, look for: The Book of Melchizedek, cave 11 the dead sea scrolls 1947. IT WAS FOUND AMONG THE OTHER DEAD SEA SCROLLS.
Jesus
Abraham was taught by Melchisedek. And Yacob
learn from Jacob.
So, the Holy of Holies of the Temple was probably built directly above this spot. Was Melchizedek an appearance of the Father or the Holy Spirit?
Sorry, the City of David theory for the Holy Temple's location has been thoroughly debunked.
The "renown biblical archaeologists" you rely upon to assert it (Ernst Martin was a meteorologist who knew nothing about academic archeology and the same goes for Robert Cornuke) clearly have not studied Charles Warren, Eilat Mazar, Conrad Schick, Barclay and Willson. Dr. Martin's theory was disproved by the experts already in the early 1990s.
The Giḥon spring only fed the residents' needs for water. Conversely, multiple cisterns and water sources are found on the Temple Mount. The Temple Mount has over 20 cisterns and conduits which were plenty of water for the services. One cistern could hold over 2 million gallons and another around 700,000 gallons. This is verified history. On top of this, Jewish records show that there was an aqueduct that brought water in abundance to the Temple Mt. from the Pools of Solomon at Etan near Bethlehem (not to be confused with the aqueduct that Pilot later built).
These people really do not know what they are talking about. The building of the Ophel south of the wall was actually the Akra which was built by Antiochus IV and destroyed by Shimon the Macabee. The City of David is not wide enough to place the 740 x 740 feet that made the 500 x 500 cubits of Temple Mt.
Bad scholarship by these people using Ernest Martin's book which was discredited a while back.
Ernest Martin is not a credible resource but Dr Benjamin Mazar, Dr. Eilat Mazar, Captain Charles Warren, Conrad Schick, Lee Ritmeyer and others are, and they all agree Mt. Moriah is the Temple Mount. By the way, the Fort of Antonia was around 40 cubits high on a high ground. The 10th legion only came to Jerusalem after the siege of Jerusalem and a cohort is 500-600 soldiers. According to Josephus the Antonia fortress was raised to the ground by the Romans in order to access the Temple Mt during the destruction of the 2nd Temple. This is only one of many points that I can give to why Dr. Martin's theory can not hold water and why Robert Cornuke is fooling thousands of gullible people who do not know any better.
The headquarters for the Roman soldiers was in Caesarea by the sea. The Antonia was not new, it was a fort that was constructed by Solomon and then rebuilt by Nehemia and called the Baris. Herod later expanded the area by filling in the fosse found on the north of the Temple and it was according to Josephus 60 feet deep and 250 wide as protection for the Temple from the north. Herod filled it up and expanded beyond the 500 cubits starting from the offset stone called the Persian stone from the time of Nehemia's time.
The experts of the City of David excavations and around the Temple Mt who work daily to reveal the history of ancient Jerusalem have found nothing to date that suggests that the Temple Mt was the Antonia fortress.
Anyway, Herod expanded to the north, west and south and those are retaining walls which were not part of the biblical measurements.
By the way, no credible recognized archeologist says the Temple was south of the Temple Mount. For example, all these archaeologists from the 1800's and 1900's who had access to the site said the same thing about the Temple being on the Temple Mt.: DeVougue 1864, Ferguson 1878, Warren 1880, Conder 1884, Schick 1896, Watson 1896, Mommert 1903, Dalman 1909, Hollis 1934, Simons 1952, Vincent 1954, Ritmeyer 1985.
And Josephus must be studied in unity with the Mishnah, Tosefta and the works of Conrad Schick topographical work of the Temple Mount. Josephus whom Martin and Cornuke both falsely quote, never said the Temple was in the city of David nor did he ever say an entire legion of Roman soldiers and their hangers on was permanently living in Jerusalem. He used the word "Tema" which means a lesser amount. Cornuke also doctors excerpts from the Jewish Bible so that they fit the claims he attempts to hawk. He has even lied that Israeli archaeologist Eli Shoukrun claimed that the Holy Temples stood in the City of David, whereas Shoukrun insists on the traditional site's location.
The Jewish tradition about the Temple Mount's location boasts anecdotal contiguity since the early AD 70's. Evidently, Josephus was aware of Jews who had begun returning daily to the Mount a mere 2-3 days after the Holy Temple had been sacked. This presence continues among others through early rabbis who ascended to it and was punctuated only for a few years in the Bar-Kokhvah revolt of 132-135 AD until the Byzantine era, when Jews were permitted to go there only one day a year. It is then, intriguingly, in the 4th century, that two gentile authors attest to this Jewish presence and note how the Jews would come up to the giant Foundation Stone and brush it with oil.
Daily Jewish presence is renewed during the Persian occupation of the early 7th century and shortly afterward with the Arab Muslim occupation of 638, a presence that was pretty uninterrupted until the First Crusade of 1099. To even suggest we Jews are so dumb that we managed to forget our holiest site along the way since the AD70 Destruction is preposterous and offensive; and utterly arrogant when stated by non-Jews. So this tradition is rock solid, and none of the Christians who attempt to defy it can provide convincing answers that bear scrutiny to the question of when the Jews forgot the supposed original site.
Sorry, but the "archeologist" cabal never bothered to read the Bible. There are at least a dozen verses in the O.T. (Tanakh) that give specific clues to the true location of the Temple. Of course, one has to have the Holy Spirit in order to pick-up on these clues. "Professional" Archeologists have deep PRIDE in their work and the "back-slapping" they receive from their cohorts. Matthew 11:25 At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes.
Sweetheart, I am a Jew who knows his Scripture in the Hebrew original and I will not take lessons in it from your likes. The findings and claims of the reputable and credible archaeologists working in Jslm. perfectly align with the Miqra (Jewish Bible). Your Non Testament's babble is totally irrelevant to this subject and any "Scripture" beyond the Miqra (such as its mistranslated "old testament" version) is Buy-Bull, let alone further mistranslations by the likes of Cornuke and Dr. Martin that were authored out of their agenda to place the Holy Temple/s in the COD.
I have neither the time nor the patience to talk sense into nincompoops like you who are obsessed with proving the Jews wrong out of the same ole' Christinsane motivations, in your (plural) futile efforts to cope with reality. Therefore, this comment concludes the extent of this exchange to me, both actively and passively. Proceed to talk in some echo chamber if you need to.
@@ZviJ1 thank you for this
@@ZviJ1 please can you send me the whole text? i have a discussion wo claims that the temple stood in the city of david
No Geneology, first communion.It all fits he also has the scared hands
Temple 0
This is why you read the word of God. Test every spirit, this dude just want some money. Lev 1:6 you flay, or skin all the burnt offerings from the bulls. Not the sheep, goats, or rams.