shame you did not start with pics of Satellite blowing up in space 3 days ago . [ warning ] ... low earth orbit will be dead ...now back to your version
@@Slavic_Goblin ... Shame part of plan [ 4 winds ] is to make low earth orbit dead [ musk link ] sooooooo you don't have to worry about tit for tat .. this is not a cricket match , where you take a turn ..OR Ladies [ rainbow] , think arming and training is not full declaration of war .... question are you familiar phrase .. broom stick in a dark star hole >>>
GPS satellites ABSOLUTELY depend on input signals. Even a few feet drift in orbit magnifies to many orders of magnitude. Their orbital data is uploaded DAILY to correct for drift in it's timing signal calculations. Lots of wrong info in this video dude....
The way to take down Glonass is to launch RF reflectors and park them in front of the Russian satellites. They maneuver around, we maneuver back in front. They run out of fuel, and that's that. We leverage our vastly superior launch capability to keep sending up dumb reflectors. The best thing about it is that it is easily reversible and doesn't clutter up space with debris. Amateur radio people have demonstrated that Starlink can be used as a GPS system. Good luck taking all those down.
The method you propose doesn't interact physically with the satellite, so the operator cannot say somebody tampered with their equipment. But if you have the ability to position and maneuver in close vicinity of a satellite then a cheaper method would be just wrapping the satellite with Al on polyamide foil and be done with it. Sure, the engines could blow some holes but the solar panels and antenna array would become useless. You need only one satellite with multiple "charges" and ion thrusters. Heck, maybe they'll use it to test a VASIMR prototype. Another method, non-contact this time, but still destructive, would be to use masers in orbit, close proximity, to overload and disable electronics. Last, would be to just jam the frequencies used in communications. Again, from orbit, but that would require just a satellite in the relative vicinity, a km or so, of the positioning system satellite. That sat could also do some spoofing on demand if equipped accordingly and we have enough reverse engineering on GLONASS.
@@jackuzi8252 Yes, it's called Kessler Syndrome. Are we prepared to live without GPS? I'm not talking about myself I can navigate using a map and a compass from one side of the street to another well enough. I mean the GPS the planes and ships are using...
@@milutzuk The question is whether the Kremlin is prepared to live without GPS (and GLONASS, assuming retaliatory measures). Given that GPS delivers far more to the US/western military and economy than GPS/GLONASS does to Russia, the answer might well be yes.
Garmin devices can support multiple Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), including GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, and IRNSS (NavIC). Some newer Garmin watches have an "All Systems" setting that allows users to connect to multiple GNSS systems at once. Just wanted to share this in case someone reads you comment and doesn’t know that and instantly assumes bad about garmins. I 100% would be a skeleton in the woods if it wasn’t for Garmin wearables saving me more than once😊.
@@Irregular503 yeah that’s what they told me on the phone. The watch is 6 months old and every exchange they send is worse in some way. I’m excited about replacing the watch soon with wahoo.
I know for a fact that the US military is going to space based signatures navigation/locating which is not subject to jamming/spoofing. You can bet others are doing the same.
@@Russia-bullies Not with proper cryptography, which the US has been doing on it's military-only bands. Google is your friend and guardian against ignorance. Try looking it up.
Do we know how intense glonass is used? Russian and Ukranian fighters have all be photographed with Garmin units in the cockpit. Garmin is a commercial US company making systems that work with American GPS. No surprise since Glonass is reliable up to 20 meters, while GPS is up to 5 meters reliable.
Most of Garmins products sold, here in Europe at least, are GPS and Glonass ready. Garmin even recommends using both simultaneously as it gives a quicker response
@@electricspeedkiller8950 Fun fact, GPS is accurate down to centimeters or even millimeters if you want, and there is no civilian or military GPS. Its all the same for everyone. Dual receivers and/or augmentation is "all" you need to get the quality of positioning the military has.
They do! During late 2022/early 2023, Russian jet pilots inadvertantly showed that they were using civilian GPS units to execute flight maneuvers to approach Ukrainian targets. Russia doesn't use GPS in its _weapons guidance_ systems because the USA can obfuscate GPS data in a warzone on command by suddenly adding encryption or momentarily shutting off satellites. The problem for Russia is that GLONASS is not good for rapidly updating location data in the way GPS is. Pull out your phone, turn on positioning and it can track your location to within 1-2 meters in real time multiple times every second. That's already absolutely stupid accurate for your show human corpus or Uber ride but insanely accurate for a GPS guided weapon traveling at Mach 4. When GLONASS _isn't being manipulated_ it gives very precise info but on a more human time scale of several seconds or minutes. So their "precision" weapons often miss by dozens of meters because the last update to their flight trajectory was 5 seconds ago while dropping at Mach 1.
The ammunition is already in space (the debris fields) so you just need to steer them towards your targets. Seeing how we know very little about X-37B am sure America has a few cards up its sleeve still.
Russia was working on interstellar nuclear station. They have good advancements in nuclear propulsion, so such vehicle can potentially be a Space Battle Cruiser or something. Maneuvering in space without needing much fuel. Just casually and without any disturbance approaching every GPS satellite.
There’s literally 100s of thousands of satellites in space I assure you only America uses americas satellites lol Americans seem to lose brain cells year on year it’s insane
@@LWQ15881 There is less than 10k satellites in orbit, almost half of which are starlink LEO guys. There is only a few dozen of the GPS types, in 4 constellations, usa russia EU and china, and yes, most consumer goods around the world that uses one of these systems uses the american one.
Your explanation of satellite lifetimes is not correct. Orbital decay depends on altitude - the higher, the lower the atmospheric drag. At 400km an orbit will decay in 10 years; at 700 km in 100 years, and at 900 km in 1,000 years. I haven’t calculated the decay time for a satnav orbit, but it’s likely many millions of years. The reasons for limited satnav lifetimes are component failure and limited fuel for stationkeeping.
They did that in the past, fucked up the upper atmosphere as well as taking out 1/3rd of active sats at the time. There's a space nuclear test ban treaty now.
Is there a reason you are showing a US boat when talking about the Russian Kazan? Starting right after the NordVPN ad. Weight until the US Flag flying on the stern shows up if you don't recognize it from the sail / SEAL decompression chambers.
As I understand it; most people think of anti- satellite weapons in the wrong way. Striking the satellites with a projectile or burning it with a beam is NOT necessary. It only takes a small amount of force applied to a satellite to send it tumbling off into space. Sure satellites have fuel onboard to make positioning and station keeping adjustments; but the amount that is carried is very limited; with most older satellites having little fuel left. So all that's needed in many cases is just a gentle, steady push over a period of time to send satellites spinning out of control.
The US and any country with any little bit of responsible thinking would be extremely reluctant to attack satellites with missiles. The debris field would take out other satellites and those debris fields would take out the rest. It would be a cascading disaster that would destroy everything in the orbit and lower orbits as the stuff eventually started to fall down.
@@jackuzi8252 I understand your logic and you might be right. On the other hand, countries that have the means to put satellites in orbit probably also have better ways to manage without them. It might somewhat level the playing field but it wouldn't be an equalizer. It definitely would justify the country with satellites to take drastic measures against another country that attacked them...
*Nobody wins a nuckear WW3, not a certainty. A hybrid-WW3 has already started. Part of psyop weapon of certain agressor is scaremongering with nuckear threats they cannot afford (or have strategic ir tactical advantages) to follow up. Only thing to fear is the fear itself.
A plot point I love from Ace Combat 7 is both sides think they'll be clever and wipe out the other side's satellites which creates a debris field that just nukes global telecommunications and cripples everyone.
Yes. Are you sure that people are not willing to trade that? Let's say a regional largely land power that doesn't have any real global commitments? Who is dependent on high bandwidth always available satcom to run their global military?
So amazing that we can just shoot down satellites from a jet like that. I think Elon has provided one answer. How easy is it to shoot down 5,000 to 30,000 satellites? Also, for the jamming issue, sure, downlinks can't be jammed. But every practical satellite uses uplinks, and those can be overloaded with RF energy. This has short term and long term effects.
@@NL-tq1yr What the 5000 satellites part? Not even then. Unless you want to set off dozens of them in LEO. Even then they would have to be nuclear nail bombs. Nukes don't do as much damage outside the atmosphere.
@@scottfranco1962 most of military and starlink satellite are leo. It's enough to detonate a nuclear explosion in space to decemet rhe area than every satellite that passes that area will be toast.
@@NL-tq1yr No, because most of the leo satellites won't be in that area or on that side of the planet. They circle the earth. Because there is no atmosphere, it would only kill the satellites in line of sight at the time of the explosion. This means to kill off a constellation of satellites would take repeated nukes, likely dozens of them. In the meantime I am guessing someone would notice and get a mite upset.
Constellations like Starlink are basically invulnerable to normal ASAT missiles becasue launching them is much cheaper than shooting them down. You would need to launch multiple interceptors with one launch on one orbital plane. But dispersing them around the whole orbit would take time and so it begin to be a game of who have more fuel for maneuvering. And Starlink's array could probably be used as crude positioning system and global real-time radar recoinnassance, just with software update. In a hot war this might be what will be done.
We all have seen multiple instances where Russian military personnel and aircraft have been using GPS over there GLONASS and it don’t take a dummy to figure out why that is🤣🤣 if I was a betting man I’d put my money on two things. 1- it’s just more reliable and more accurate. 2- since both sides are jamming the living shit out of anything electronic if they use the enemies way of things there’s a better chance those things are not being jammed and can be used with less interference. But if I had to chose just one it would be the first opinion and that’s most likely the biggest reason. Keep in mind I know fuck all about jamming and electronic warfare so I’m talking from what little information I do know about the topic🤨🤨
One big difference this video did not cover is that the Russian military complement their Sat-Nav systems with ground based radio beacons via their EW units. Also they rarely use GPS/GLONASS for targeting themselves because of the susceptibility to jamming/spoofing, a common example being the sudden detection of high priority precision weapons like HIMARS GS-31 or Stormshadow incoming will trigger widespread and largely indiscriminate jamming and spoofing which adversely affects their own weapons if using GPS/GLONASS.
GLONASS has better coverage in the polar region, because Russia is closer to the north pole. GPS has better coverage around the equator, which is one of the reason why phones have both GPS and GLONASS. That is one of the technical reasons. I would not be surprised if US devices would switch to GLONASS in the northern polar regions, Canada, Norway, Sweden etc. Same way expect Russian planes to use GPS guidance around the equator. Also another thing to add is GPS/GLONASS are merely used to add corrections to the existing inertial guidance systems. So at worse the difference would be no more than 20-30m. The other reason is the term GPS is widely used as a Blanket term for GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems), most of the people are not even aware of GLONASS, they think it is the same. Jamming and Spoofing are a different thing though, mentor pilot did a video on it, you should check it out. It goes into details about the systems and how jamming and spoofing works. You dont need to have high tech systems. The Russians just added a unidirectional antenas to get around jamming and spoofing while only allowing signals coming from above to pass, bypassing ground based jamming equipments. If you are interested, Iran spoofed a US drone to land it within Iran.
@@masoodjalal1152 I have a $200 Chinese phone (Cubot brand) and it uses all 5 satellite systems. Use of the unencrypted beacon data isn't really restricted by anything other than the software and minor receiver hardware components. The idea that the American GPS system (the oldest and most primitive) is somehow superior to the other 4 is somewhat delusional.
Low earth orbit satellites can potentially be disabled by long term heating from ground based directed energy weapons. But navigation satellites and other objects in higher orbits would need strikes from space based energy weapon platforms or kinetic ASAT weapons. Kinetic weapons create a lot of debris and energy based weapons would be preferred to reduce the mess.
One topic not discussed is launching rockets filled with tungsten/lead/steel balls into your enemy's constellation orbit, in the opposite direction. One metric ton of cargo would equate to 100,000 10-gram objects. Instead of launching in the direction of earth's rotation, launch against it, producing high velocity impacts with other objects (navigation satellites) in that orbit. Impacts would produce more debris. While the effect wouldn't be instant, satellite destruction would continue for a few years until the metal balls fell out of orbit, so even if the enemy had additional satellites ready to launch, they'd meet the same fate as existing ones. Of course the enemy could do the same thing to your constellation, so this would only be a winning play for Russia or China (in that the US has more to lose if all navigation satellites are destroyed).
That creates more hazards for other objects such as commercial satellites and even the ISS. A unitary kinetic intercept is already producing way too much debris. A space claymore mine would multiply the hazard. Energy weapons are a better path.
@@stupidburp As noted, energy weapons are impractical against nav satellites due to their high orbits. Mass release of small objects in collision orbits would be inexpensive and require no new technology. Most of the hazard would be confined to objects in that orbit. Note that they wouldn't have to be dispersed with any kind of large explosion, just sort of "dispensed". The reverse orbit provides the destructive energy.
@@grekiki 100,000 is just a per-ton (tonne) number. Russians have rockets that can lift 6.5 tons to geostationary orbit. Of course that's going WITH the earth's rotation, so the payload might be halved...but of course multiple launches are possible.
A new navigation system has been developed which uses the magnetic signature of the surface. The developers claim it is accurate to a meter and cannot be jammed. Airliners will soon be using it to avoid GPS jamming and spoofing.
I have vaguely heard of it, and there is theorethical research in using neutrino-based navigation too. My question is, which country develops what you claim and where did you get this?
@@dannydetonator This system reads the magnetism in the Earth's crust which cannot be changed or jammed, or made to send false position data to aircraft. The man said that it was totally passive, so couldn't be jammed. I think it came up in a discussion of the problems airliners are having flying near Russia because of GPS jamming. It sounds fantastic to me, but the man said it was a done deal and would probably be in airliners fairly soon. Who knows. He was an American working for some American company.
The US military is going to space based signatures navigation/locating which is not subject to jamming/spoofing. You can bet others are doing the same.
@@nadahere The only thing I got on that is a research article. I deeply doubt how reliable these are. Also, these will require LEO sats. Those will more far more vulnerable and might be directly hacked.
someone told me gps is not encrypted so the receiver doesnt know which signal is true, so if you overload it then it is punked as you can entercept their codes and then overload it with nonsense data...
American GPS used to be military only. Then it was public band (lower accuracy)and an encrypted military band (higher accuracy). The military band was decrypted by Clinton. GPS was originally created due to USSR shooting down a Korean airliner en route form anchorage to Seoul. There are still jam-resistant mlitary bands. Theres no telling what secret gps packages migh be3 carried on other satellites. They are trying to use Starlink asw a backup GPS system- researchers got prettygood accuracy with just it'sregular signal and not with a sgps system on board.Keyb0ae is mke3wsigt bup.Wiiikieeieedediqa gps and theres tnons of information.
Target the ground control stations with extreme prejudice. The satellites are sent correction signals about every 15 to 20 minutes. Disrupt that, and you will, in about a day's time, have inaccurate and unacceptable positioning data. Take out the ground stations, and their satellites will fail shortly thereafter.
@libraeotequever3pointoh95 I believe, at this point, whether or not Ukraine and the Western world can be called a war or not with Russia is just a matter of quibbling over semantics. We are at war, a slow-moving swing of the cricket bat until final contact
should just send up 100s of lite weight solar sailing space drones to slowly reorientate orbit parameters towards various juicy space targets to activate when order 66 is signaled....
The video was pretty clear it was medium orbit, and then there's a few that Russia is putting up in highly elliptical orbits -- look up Molnya and Tundra orbits for examples -- in order to get better coverage just over Russia.
His grammar and general use of English are very good - like a native. But he struggles with "th" and with other sounds of English. Like most foreigners, he can hear only the sounds of his native language and reproduces only those in his English. Hence the distracting accent.
Seems with their home grown system Russian pilots wouldn't need to tape up over the counter American system GPS receivers in their newest and finest planes. Yet they were there for all to see in Russian Go Pro footage from early missions. They don't even trust their own system, how much of a concern is it?
Technology integration is a massive process that requires billions of dollars to seemlessly integrate like how US managed. Russia is not a superpower neither are China and India. US truly is sole superpower. Russian glonass is an attempt just that, an attempt
@@electricspeedkiller8950word for word everything he said is true. Its not hubris, its reality. If they lowered their corruption to Soviet levels, maybe things would change.
It is in all ins-only planes to get fixes (americans did such too), those which with integrated space nav, uses whole range of nav systems glonass+gps+bsidu+whatether becous it uses western universal electronics components lol
The idea of the US resorting to the kinetic destruction of adversarial satellites is absurd at this stage; a better question would be what EW solutions would/could the US use to hinder said satellites.
In low atmosphere lasers are more feasible. Less scatter and the satellites are in an environment where any heat they receive they can't easily cool. Remember air cooking is no longer a thing in space
GPS/GLONASS don't really use ground control stations, they have an internal clock with a correction on it, your GPS/GLONASS device just receives the time signals and location data of the satellites themselves, and extrapolates your position from that using the delay in th clock time on the satellite, and the Doppler effect.
@@greencanner4284 I'm quite familiar with how GNSS works. I've been using it for 30 years as a land surveyor. I manage a GNSS RTK network in southern California. Each system (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and Beidou) uses ground control stations to establish their orbits, update clocks and to upload ephemerides. It is one of the 3 main segments of all systems, the others being space and ground. GLONASS has a pretty weak ground segment as it is. Without an updated orbit, the satellite vehicle position you reference in your description would rapidly degrade (days or weeks), with a subsequent degradation in positioning accuracy for the user segment. At some point it would not meet the user's needs. As the US GPS satellite on-orbit technology has modernized, they have added some degree of self control from space, but I don't recall the details of that. I doubt the Russians have any number of SV's in orbit that can do that, if they even have plans to add that capability at all.
First of all - laser beam is never ideally straight / coherent - there's always some residual dispersion at emmiter, not medium related. For context - laser guidance gives ~2m dot at ~10km. Imagine dispersion at 20 000 km.
Doesn't have to be visible light spectrum. Microwave or other spectrum directed energy weapons are feasible. Microwave transmitters are currently in common use for communications. Scaled up these could potentially bake a satellite slowly over time. Dumping heat is difficult in space because of the vacuum. Overwhelming the heat radiator systems in a satellite should be feasible because it will likely take more than a single orbit to cool. Cumulative heating at each pass could eventually bake the electronics rendering it inert.
I forget the name of it, but Russia has like four satellite receivers or something and didn't. Ukraine blow up one of them so they're only able to gather so much data
Makes you wonder……how did Russia manage to build a giant satellite receiver in Crimea if they’ve only been there since 2014? Turns out they’ve been there since 1783 and built the satellite facilities in the 1970’s.
Please make a video about the current state from US and China Navies. Maybe talk about the navy of others countries in the south china sea area and the us and china shipbuilding capabilities
So much blabbing - yet not a single thought about Kessler's syndrome. Intercept just a handful of sats with missiles and the *whole* orbit is going to shit for everybody for decades.
No. You don't understand Kessler's syndrome. That's a low orbit phenomenon. While certainly a concern at say 200km, it simply isn't a meaningful concern at a 20,000km orbit.
Then a guy with 3 DirecTV receivers get full precision locations from a giant constellation of cheap internet satellites from an billionaire buffon... 🤔🙃🤫
Is the need to update the satellites another vulnerability? GPS satellites have their positions tracked by a whole series of tracking stations and the satellites then need to be told their own new position data, which itself is not easy because they are far away. If something interfered with/sabotaged the tracking or updating for Glonass, that would be a serious issue. And given that the US has bases all over the world, they have a lot more tracking locations to use. Would this make a difference?
I think less people are aware Glonass exists than they are aware that GPS exists, so makes for a more interesting title, also Ukraine has 2 options (Galileo & GPS) so it would be harder to destroy both. But you know what you were thinking when you asked that question, you were thinking that he talks about Glonass because he is biased, which is also probably true
@Ekstrax my question was more: why discuss the weaknesses of Russia Infrastructure. Surely a better balanced view is, what are the weaknesses of all GPS systems. I do suppose I am making it political, as I don't think either the west or Russia gets a balanced view of World issues or positions just their own propaganda.
@@Alex.Holland So, maneuvering using cold gas thrusters and covering the exterior in radar absorbing material would do nothing? We're not talking about Romulan cloaking device here, just significantly reduced observability and radar cross section. My bet is that DARPA already has the tech.
NATO doesn't need to panic, Russia can't fight its way out of a paper bag and the west is enjoying watching the Russian military and economy evaporate. How desperate do you need to be to go ask North Korea for soldiers? 🤣🤣
@@jsncrso The Russians have slaughtered the Nat0 created armed and led military of the Ukraine every pathetic Nat0 game changer weapon has failed but you guys keep cope alive lol
@@nigelgarrett7970 I do Love the pathetic nafo talking point of the 3 day war that was never stated by Russia only by nato propaganda outlets though for time tables the ukie military said last year they will be in Crimea in 3 weeks they made it a foot and a half forward lost tens of thousands of men and all the western super duper weapons they were given that year LMFO
Get the Binkov plushie here: crowdmade.com/collections/binkovsbattlegrounds/products/binkovs-battlegrounds-plush
I wonder if any current electromagnetic railguns could achieve a sat-kill altitude?
Or any of the centrifugal launch platforms in development?
shame you did not start with pics of Satellite blowing up in space 3 days ago . [ warning ] ... low earth orbit will be dead
...now back to your version
The biggest problem to striking at GLONASS, is that in a tit for tat that ensues, we'd get Kesslered... and nobody wants that.
It's yet another M.A.D.
@@Slavic_Goblin ... Shame part of plan
[ 4 winds ] is to make low earth orbit dead [ musk link ] sooooooo you don't have to worry about tit for tat .. this is not a cricket match , where you take a turn ..OR Ladies [ rainbow] , think arming and training is not full declaration of war .... question are you familiar phrase .. broom stick in a dark star hole >>>
@@Slavic_Goblin MAd ...lol ..see you in hell Stefan Bandara
Russian satellite breaks up in space, forcing ISS astronauts to shelter in capsules: great timing.
GPS satellites ABSOLUTELY depend on input signals. Even a few feet drift in orbit magnifies to many orders of magnitude. Their orbital data is uploaded DAILY to correct for drift in it's timing signal calculations. Lots of wrong info in this video dude....
The way to take down Glonass is to launch RF reflectors and park them in front of the Russian satellites. They maneuver around, we maneuver back in front. They run out of fuel, and that's that. We leverage our vastly superior launch capability to keep sending up dumb reflectors. The best thing about it is that it is easily reversible and doesn't clutter up space with debris.
Amateur radio people have demonstrated that Starlink can be used as a GPS system. Good luck taking all those down.
The method you propose doesn't interact physically with the satellite, so the operator cannot say somebody tampered with their equipment. But if you have the ability to position and maneuver in close vicinity of a satellite then a cheaper method would be just wrapping the satellite with Al on polyamide foil and be done with it. Sure, the engines could blow some holes but the solar panels and antenna array would become useless. You need only one satellite with multiple "charges" and ion thrusters. Heck, maybe they'll use it to test a VASIMR prototype. Another method, non-contact this time, but still destructive, would be to use masers in orbit, close proximity, to overload and disable electronics. Last, would be to just jam the frequencies used in communications. Again, from orbit, but that would require just a satellite in the relative vicinity, a km or so, of the positioning system satellite. That sat could also do some spoofing on demand if equipped accordingly and we have enough reverse engineering on GLONASS.
Large quantities of tungsten/lead/steel balls launched into orbit in the opposite direction can take anything down.
@@jackuzi8252 Yes, it's called Kessler Syndrome. Are we prepared to live without GPS? I'm not talking about myself I can navigate using a map and a compass from one side of the street to another well enough. I mean the GPS the planes and ships are using...
@@milutzuk The question is whether the Kremlin is prepared to live without GPS (and GLONASS, assuming retaliatory measures). Given that GPS delivers far more to the US/western military and economy than GPS/GLONASS does to Russia, the answer might well be yes.
@@jackuzi8252 That would be very bad for everyone. Google "Kessler syndrome."
My Garmin wearables use Glonas. It sucks so bad I could care less if all the satellites get blown up lol
Garmin devices can support multiple Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), including GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, and IRNSS (NavIC). Some newer Garmin watches have an "All Systems" setting that allows users to connect to multiple GNSS systems at once. Just wanted to share this in case someone reads you comment and doesn’t know that and instantly assumes bad about garmins. I 100% would be a skeleton in the woods if it wasn’t for Garmin wearables saving me more than once😊.
You'll care about the debris if it happens enough times
@@Irregular503 yeah that’s what they told me on the phone. The watch is 6 months old and every exchange they send is worse in some way. I’m excited about replacing the watch soon with wahoo.
Couldn't care less. Could care less would mean that you do care.
@@MrWezzell thanks for pointing out something worthless Mr Weasel lol
Maybe the real GPS is the friends we find along the way...
I know for a fact that the US military is going to space based signatures navigation/locating which is not subject to jamming/spoofing. You can bet others are doing the same.
Doesn't that require LEO satelites? Which will make the guidance Sats way more vulnerable.
I know that all signals are jammable & spoofable & you’re silly.
@@Russia-bullies Not with proper cryptography, which the US has been doing on it's military-only bands. Google is your friend and guardian against ignorance. Try looking it up.
Do we know how intense glonass is used? Russian and Ukranian fighters have all be photographed with Garmin units in the cockpit. Garmin is a commercial US company making systems that work with American GPS. No surprise since Glonass is reliable up to 20 meters, while GPS is up to 5 meters reliable.
Most of Garmins products sold, here in Europe at least, are GPS and Glonass ready.
Garmin even recommends using both simultaneously as it gives a quicker response
Military GLONASS is up to 4-5m accurate, and military GPS is up to 2-3m accurate.
@@electricspeedkiller8950 Fun fact, GPS is accurate down to centimeters or even millimeters if you want, and there is no civilian or military GPS. Its all the same for everyone. Dual receivers and/or augmentation is "all" you need to get the quality of positioning the military has.
Isnt gps an open thing though? Like couldnt russia equip it as a backup?
Lol giving gps data on russian assets to the US sounds like it would work
They do! During late 2022/early 2023, Russian jet pilots inadvertantly showed that they were using civilian GPS units to execute flight maneuvers to approach Ukrainian targets.
Russia doesn't use GPS in its _weapons guidance_ systems because the USA can obfuscate GPS data in a warzone on command by suddenly adding encryption or momentarily shutting off satellites. The problem for Russia is that GLONASS is not good for rapidly updating location data in the way GPS is. Pull out your phone, turn on positioning and it can track your location to within 1-2 meters in real time multiple times every second. That's already absolutely stupid accurate for your show human corpus or Uber ride but insanely accurate for a GPS guided weapon traveling at Mach 4. When GLONASS _isn't being manipulated_ it gives very precise info but on a more human time scale of several seconds or minutes. So their "precision" weapons often miss by dozens of meters because the last update to their flight trajectory was 5 seconds ago while dropping at Mach 1.
Just search "Russian jet using GPS" on any search engine and you'll get tons of pictures and videos of them using GPS
Flying IFR becomes I Follow Roads
VFR becomes Very Fast Roads for increased throttle over highways
The ammunition is already in space (the debris fields) so you just need to steer them towards your targets. Seeing how we know very little about X-37B am sure America has a few cards up its sleeve still.
Kenetic hits or an emp on the satellites themselves
why not just drope nukes in space?
Because they have the chance to affect ALL sattelites
20 seconds damn I must be first 🤔
How can Glonasty gps be disabled? Get the ruskie manning the big red on button drunk. 😂
Loser.
Russia was working on interstellar nuclear station. They have good advancements in nuclear propulsion, so such vehicle can potentially be a Space Battle Cruiser or something. Maneuvering in space without needing much fuel. Just casually and without any disturbance approaching every GPS satellite.
No way it's interstellar😂😂😂 you talking about an NTR?
@@alisenoweirddudo6898 Interplanetary... Yeah, interstellar is wild. Not that nuclear space station isn't...
I heard they got the Interstellar technology from Aliens because they love Irkutsk so much
NO EVERYONE DOESNT USE THEIR OWN SYSTEM, EVERYONE USES AMERICA'S !
Not true !!
There’s literally 100s of thousands of satellites in space I assure you only America uses americas satellites lol Americans seem to lose brain cells year on year it’s insane
@@LWQ15881 There is less than 10k satellites in orbit, almost half of which are starlink LEO guys. There is only a few dozen of the GPS types, in 4 constellations, usa russia EU and china, and yes, most consumer goods around the world that uses one of these systems uses the american one.
@@LWQ15881you’re a simple person aren’t ya
I prefer the Somali one
America's last decade has begun.
Your explanation of satellite lifetimes is not correct. Orbital decay depends on altitude - the higher, the lower the atmospheric drag. At 400km an orbit will decay in 10 years; at 700 km in 100 years, and at 900 km in 1,000 years. I haven’t calculated the decay time for a satnav orbit, but it’s likely many millions of years. The reasons for limited satnav lifetimes are component failure and limited fuel for stationkeeping.
that reference to Not What You Think KILLED me lmao
They did that in the past, fucked up the upper atmosphere as well as taking out 1/3rd of active sats at the time. There's a space nuclear test ban treaty now.
GLONASS (GPS) ❌
GLONASS / GPS ✅
lmao your "not what you think" reference was pretty awesome 😅 the self awareness of how similar it sounds to the original is pretty hilarious
Is there a reason you are showing a US boat when talking about the Russian Kazan? Starting right after the NordVPN ad. Weight until the US Flag flying on the stern shows up if you don't recognize it from the sail / SEAL decompression chambers.
Wait* not weight
Looking has they regularly use consumer grade GPS clients, I don''t think Russian armed forces would miss GLONASS that much...
*Bot Detected*
@@Ekstrax Sorry to disappoint you vatnik, the fotos of russian planes with Garmin GPS hanging on the cockpit are real.
As I understand it; most people think of anti- satellite weapons in the wrong way.
Striking the satellites with a projectile or burning it with a beam is NOT necessary.
It only takes a small amount of force applied to a satellite to send it tumbling off into space.
Sure satellites have fuel onboard to make positioning and station keeping adjustments; but the amount that is carried is very limited; with most older satellites having little fuel left.
So all that's needed in many cases is just a gentle, steady push over a period of time to send satellites spinning out of control.
Hello hope everyone has a great weekend 😊❤
The US and any country with any little bit of responsible thinking would be extremely reluctant to attack satellites with missiles.
The debris field would take out other satellites and those debris fields would take out the rest. It would be a cascading disaster that would destroy everything in the orbit and lower orbits as the stuff eventually started to fall down.
But if you don't have a significant satellite fleet of your own, that could be a win. When no one has satellites, every country's equal.
@@jackuzi8252
I understand your logic and you might be right. On the other hand, countries that have the means to put satellites in orbit probably also have better ways to manage without them. It might somewhat level the playing field but it wouldn't be an equalizer.
It definitely would justify the country with satellites to take drastic measures against another country that attacked them...
"Its not what you think". I see what you did there
Space Force!
GLONASS will go down on it's own. That will happen before we want to do something about it.
You're speaking like Ukrainian
all the experts on who would win WW3....No one wins WW3
*Nobody wins a nuckear WW3, not a certainty. A hybrid-WW3 has already started. Part of psyop weapon of certain agressor is scaremongering with nuckear threats they cannot afford (or have strategic ir tactical advantages) to follow up. Only thing to fear is the fear itself.
mate, my biggest fear is kessler syndrome, how did you no mention this in the opening
When you have more to lose than your enemy that can fight back you are bound to lose the fight
I swear I thought the thumbnail was of a satellite dropping cigarettes onto Russian warships. Haha.
Just create their own MIT Moscow institute of technology that will catch them up in no time
hope you find a solution for the troops in kursk
A plot point I love from Ace Combat 7 is both sides think they'll be clever and wipe out the other side's satellites which creates a debris field that just nukes global telecommunications and cripples everyone.
Yes. Are you sure that people are not willing to trade that? Let's say a regional largely land power that doesn't have any real global commitments? Who is dependent on high bandwidth always available satcom to run their global military?
So amazing that we can just shoot down satellites from a jet like that. I think Elon has provided one answer. How easy is it to shoot down 5,000 to 30,000 satellites?
Also, for the jamming issue, sure, downlinks can't be jammed. But every practical satellite uses uplinks, and those can be overloaded with RF energy. This has short term and long term effects.
Pretty easy if you have a nuke
@@NL-tq1yr What the 5000 satellites part? Not even then. Unless you want to set off dozens of them in LEO. Even then they would have to be nuclear nail bombs. Nukes don't do as much damage outside the atmosphere.
@@scottfranco1962 most of military and starlink satellite are leo.
It's enough to detonate a nuclear explosion in space to decemet rhe area than every satellite that passes that area will be toast.
@@NL-tq1yr No, because most of the leo satellites won't be in that area or on that side of the planet. They circle the earth. Because there is no atmosphere, it would only kill the satellites in line of sight at the time of the explosion. This means to kill off a constellation of satellites would take repeated nukes, likely dozens of them. In the meantime I am guessing someone would notice and get a mite upset.
Multiple small lasers can be used like a large single laser...
"Plays imperial March"
Constellations like Starlink are basically invulnerable to normal ASAT missiles becasue launching them is much cheaper than shooting them down. You would need to launch multiple interceptors with one launch on one orbital plane. But dispersing them around the whole orbit would take time and so it begin to be a game of who have more fuel for maneuvering.
And Starlink's array could probably be used as crude positioning system and global real-time radar recoinnassance, just with software update. In a hot war this might be what will be done.
I don’t think Russians would be bothered, nor would they care about the danger to orbital traffic
@@looinrims They wouldn't be bothered with what?
We all have seen multiple instances where Russian military personnel and aircraft have been using GPS over there GLONASS and it don’t take a dummy to figure out why that is🤣🤣 if I was a betting man I’d put my money on two things. 1- it’s just more reliable and more accurate. 2- since both sides are jamming the living shit out of anything electronic if they use the enemies way of things there’s a better chance those things are not being jammed and can be used with less interference. But if I had to chose just one it would be the first opinion and that’s most likely the biggest reason. Keep in mind I know fuck all about jamming and electronic warfare so I’m talking from what little information I do know about the topic🤨🤨
One big difference this video did not cover is that the Russian military complement their Sat-Nav systems with ground based radio beacons via their EW units.
Also they rarely use GPS/GLONASS for targeting themselves because of the susceptibility to jamming/spoofing, a common example being the sudden detection of high priority precision weapons like HIMARS GS-31 or Stormshadow incoming will trigger widespread and largely indiscriminate jamming and spoofing which adversely affects their own weapons if using GPS/GLONASS.
GLONASS has better coverage in the polar region, because Russia is closer to the north pole. GPS has better coverage around the equator, which is one of the reason why phones have both GPS and GLONASS. That is one of the technical reasons. I would not be surprised if US devices would switch to GLONASS in the northern polar regions, Canada, Norway, Sweden etc. Same way expect Russian planes to use GPS guidance around the equator. Also another thing to add is GPS/GLONASS are merely used to add corrections to the existing inertial guidance systems. So at worse the difference would be no more than 20-30m.
The other reason is the term GPS is widely used as a Blanket term for GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems), most of the people are not even aware of GLONASS, they think it is the same.
Jamming and Spoofing are a different thing though, mentor pilot did a video on it, you should check it out. It goes into details about the systems and how jamming and spoofing works. You dont need to have high tech systems. The Russians just added a unidirectional antenas to get around jamming and spoofing while only allowing signals coming from above to pass, bypassing ground based jamming equipments. If you are interested, Iran spoofed a US drone to land it within Iran.
@@masoodjalal1152 I have a $200 Chinese phone (Cubot brand) and it uses all 5 satellite systems.
Use of the unencrypted beacon data isn't really restricted by anything other than the software and minor receiver hardware components.
The idea that the American GPS system (the oldest and most primitive) is somehow superior to the other 4 is somewhat delusional.
This video did not show up in my recomendations, despite me having the bell thinghy turned on. Not something that I seee happening very often.
Lol at glonas being jammed by the occupiers themselves when they try jam GPS. genius work.
Lol for spelling the subject wrong.
Low earth orbit satellites can potentially be disabled by long term heating from ground based directed energy weapons. But navigation satellites and other objects in higher orbits would need strikes from space based energy weapon platforms or kinetic ASAT weapons. Kinetic weapons create a lot of debris and energy based weapons would be preferred to reduce the mess.
Fall into the sea, GLONASS, fall into the sea.
Nothing on the L3-Harris CCS?
Space Force suhs & you gotta wonder what that lil cargo bayed space shuttle’s been doing for decades up there 🤔
I hope no one will destroy satellites with rockets because that would cause a Kessler Syndrom for our planet.
One topic not discussed is launching rockets filled with tungsten/lead/steel balls into your enemy's constellation orbit, in the opposite direction. One metric ton of cargo would equate to 100,000 10-gram objects. Instead of launching in the direction of earth's rotation, launch against it, producing high velocity impacts with other objects (navigation satellites) in that orbit. Impacts would produce more debris. While the effect wouldn't be instant, satellite destruction would continue for a few years until the metal balls fell out of orbit, so even if the enemy had additional satellites ready to launch, they'd meet the same fate as existing ones. Of course the enemy could do the same thing to your constellation, so this would only be a winning play for Russia or China (in that the US has more to lose if all navigation satellites are destroyed).
100k objects isn't even that much, sattelite would just climb into 5km higher orbit if needed.
That creates more hazards for other objects such as commercial satellites and even the ISS. A unitary kinetic intercept is already producing way too much debris. A space claymore mine would multiply the hazard. Energy weapons are a better path.
@@stupidburp As noted, energy weapons are impractical against nav satellites due to their high orbits. Mass release of small objects in collision orbits would be inexpensive and require no new technology. Most of the hazard would be confined to objects in that orbit. Note that they wouldn't have to be dispersed with any kind of large explosion, just sort of "dispensed". The reverse orbit provides the destructive energy.
@@grekiki 100,000 is just a per-ton (tonne) number. Russians have rockets that can lift 6.5 tons to geostationary orbit. Of course that's going WITH the earth's rotation, so the payload might be halved...but of course multiple launches are possible.
That would fuck everyone on earth and would basically be a terrorist attack. It would eliminate everything in that orbit and beyond.
A new navigation system has been developed which uses the magnetic signature of the surface. The developers claim it is accurate to a meter and cannot be jammed. Airliners will soon be using it to avoid GPS jamming and spoofing.
I have vaguely heard of it, and there is theorethical research in using neutrino-based navigation too. My question is, which country develops what you claim and where did you get this?
@@dannydetonator This system reads the magnetism in the Earth's crust which cannot be changed or jammed, or made to send false position data to aircraft. The man said that it was totally passive, so couldn't be jammed. I think it came up in a discussion of the problems airliners are having flying near Russia because of GPS jamming. It sounds fantastic to me, but the man said it was a done deal and would probably be in airliners fairly soon. Who knows. He was an American working for some American company.
The US military is going to space based signatures navigation/locating which is not subject to jamming/spoofing. You can bet others are doing the same.
@@nadahere The only thing I got on that is a research article. I deeply doubt how reliable these are. Also, these will require LEO sats. Those will more far more vulnerable and might be directly hacked.
@@aniksamiurrahman6365 No satellites required. I know what I'm talking about because I move in those circles
My laser pointer is good enough
someone told me gps is not encrypted so the receiver doesnt know which signal is true, so if you overload it then it is punked as you can entercept their codes and then overload it with nonsense data...
American GPS used to be military only. Then it was public band (lower accuracy)and an encrypted military band (higher accuracy). The military band was decrypted by Clinton. GPS was originally created due to USSR shooting down a Korean airliner en route form anchorage to Seoul. There are still jam-resistant mlitary bands. Theres no telling what secret gps packages migh be3 carried on other satellites. They are trying to use Starlink asw a backup GPS system- researchers got prettygood accuracy with just it'sregular signal and not with a sgps system on board.Keyb0ae is mke3wsigt bup.Wiiikieeieedediqa gps and theres tnons of information.
Title should be this:- how to start WW3
Too unspecific.
How to maybe start Kessler Syndrome
That would be lazy and very overused by people who spend too much time on Twitter
You looking for a Ironclad agreement with Jihad Joe
@@Paulftate Lol. Haven't heard that one. Stop making him sound so badass.
🔴 I'm surprised you didn't mention the possibility of going after the ground stations. Wouldn't it be a lot easier?
1 of the 4 is gone, so I'm told.
Target the ground control stations with extreme prejudice.
The satellites are sent correction signals about every 15 to 20 minutes.
Disrupt that, and you will, in about a day's time, have inaccurate and unacceptable positioning data.
Take out the ground stations, and their satellites will fail shortly thereafter.
That would be construed as an act of war, though.
@libraeotequever3pointoh95 I believe, at this point, whether or not Ukraine and the Western world can be called a war or not with Russia is just a matter of quibbling over semantics.
We are at war, a slow-moving swing of the cricket bat until final contact
should just send up 100s of lite weight solar sailing space drones to slowly reorientate orbit parameters towards various juicy space targets to activate when order 66 is signaled....
Your Graphic implied the Glonass Sat are geostationary ? they are not so.
The video was pretty clear it was medium orbit, and then there's a few that Russia is putting up in highly elliptical orbits -- look up Molnya and Tundra orbits for examples -- in order to get better coverage just over Russia.
13:18 It's not *_"trash-hold"_* 😊
His grammar and general use of English are very good - like a native. But he struggles with "th" and with other sounds of English. Like most foreigners, he can hear only the sounds of his native language and reproduces only those in his English. Hence the distracting accent.
Do you have a road atlas anon?
RUSSIANS DONT EVEN HAVE UP TO DATE MAPS , HOW DOES THIS WORK OUT FOR THEM .😮😊
a russian satellite literally exploded as you put out this video endangering astronauts
Seems with their home grown system Russian pilots wouldn't need to tape up over the counter American system GPS receivers in their newest and finest planes. Yet they were there for all to see in Russian Go Pro footage from early missions. They don't even trust their own system, how much of a concern is it?
Technology integration is a massive process that requires billions of dollars to seemlessly integrate like how US managed.
Russia is not a superpower neither are China and India.
US truly is sole superpower.
Russian glonass is an attempt just that, an attempt
@@gantulgaganhuyag717 I'm glad you say it with such confidance. Just keep minding your business and don't look at them.
@@electricspeedkiller8950word for word everything he said is true. Its not hubris, its reality. If they lowered their corruption to Soviet levels, maybe things would change.
It is in all ins-only planes to get fixes (americans did such too), those which with integrated space nav, uses whole range of nav systems glonass+gps+bsidu+whatether becous it uses western universal electronics components lol
Putin drank from a cup. 15:33
this is the kind of fact finding we need
Cup of tea, Dear?
"it's not what you think" everyone: Wait what channel am I watching?
It is actually a piece of cake, do nothing. There is a very good chance of a self-destruction.
😂 12:04 joke, I almost hit unsubscribe.
There's a little tiny space shuttle that's weaponized with a big surprise 😅 for ze ruzzia!
I am happy with my bunking plushie ❤ even tho I overpaid lmao still I been a binkov fan since your early days
The idea of the US resorting to the kinetic destruction of adversarial satellites is absurd at this stage; a better question would be what EW solutions would/could the US use to hinder said satellites.
In low atmosphere lasers are more feasible. Less scatter and the satellites are in an environment where any heat they receive they can't easily cool. Remember air cooking is no longer a thing in space
What about attacking ground control stations?
GPS/GLONASS don't really use ground control stations, they have an internal clock with a correction on it, your GPS/GLONASS device just receives the time signals and location data of the satellites themselves, and extrapolates your position from that using the delay in th clock time on the satellite, and the Doppler effect.
@@greencanner4284 I'm quite familiar with how GNSS works. I've been using it for 30 years as a land surveyor. I manage a GNSS RTK network in southern California.
Each system (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and Beidou) uses ground control stations to establish their orbits, update clocks and to upload ephemerides. It is one of the 3 main segments of all systems, the others being space and ground.
GLONASS has a pretty weak ground segment as it is. Without an updated orbit, the satellite vehicle position you reference in your description would rapidly degrade (days or weeks), with a subsequent degradation in positioning accuracy for the user segment. At some point it would not meet the user's needs.
As the US GPS satellite on-orbit technology has modernized, they have added some degree of self control from space, but I don't recall the details of that. I doubt the Russians have any number of SV's in orbit that can do that, if they even have plans to add that capability at all.
Can't we develop a laser weapon that could work at that distance... Basically cut off the panels or something
A distant target is difficult to hit.
Sounds like glonass is fine
👍🏻😎👽🤖
First of all - laser beam is never ideally straight / coherent - there's always some residual dispersion at emmiter, not medium related. For context - laser guidance gives ~2m dot at ~10km. Imagine dispersion at 20 000 km.
Doesn't have to be visible light spectrum. Microwave or other spectrum directed energy weapons are feasible. Microwave transmitters are currently in common use for communications. Scaled up these could potentially bake a satellite slowly over time. Dumping heat is difficult in space because of the vacuum. Overwhelming the heat radiator systems in a satellite should be feasible because it will likely take more than a single orbit to cool. Cumulative heating at each pass could eventually bake the electronics rendering it inert.
It's called the X-37.
Bingo
Binkov, the Russian bots will not like this video!
for that, аmerican bots are squealing with happiness
I forget the name of it, but Russia has like four satellite receivers or something and didn't. Ukraine blow up one of them so they're only able to gather so much data
Makes you wonder……how did Russia manage to build a giant satellite receiver in Crimea if they’ve only been there since 2014?
Turns out they’ve been there since 1783 and built the satellite facilities in the 1970’s.
at least figure out the topic, the ukra`s damaged the early warning system about the attack, and not what you said.
Don't attack the satellites, hit the ground stations. It only takes a week or two for accuracy to be seriously degraded.
Please make a video about the current state from US and China Navies. Maybe talk about the navy of others countries in the south china sea area and the us and china shipbuilding capabilities
1st
early!
The Chinese trolls are out in this one !
So much blabbing - yet not a single thought about Kessler's syndrome. Intercept just a handful of sats with missiles and the *whole* orbit is going to shit for everybody for decades.
By the time you wiped out the other birds in the same orbit, the target could deploy another constellation in a slightly different orbit.
No. You don't understand Kessler's syndrome. That's a low orbit phenomenon. While certainly a concern at say 200km, it simply isn't a meaningful concern at a 20,000km orbit.
kotal kahn
انسال ياجوج و ماجوج ، لكم مفاجأه
Then a guy with 3 DirecTV receivers get full precision locations from a giant constellation of cheap internet satellites from an billionaire buffon... 🤔🙃🤫
DF-21D ASBM Saved
1941 Pearl Harbor From
Japan Attack?
Don't even think about it. It will open a can of worms.
The West is running out of ways to escalate the conflict.
@@shanerooney7288 Exactly, time to end this war and reach a negotiated settlement
This is why quantum navigation needs more investment.
How likely is it that it will be viable?
@@h.c5750 vehicles do able now, missile warheads not yet
@@h.c5750 At the moment, I think it is more considered for ships and submarines to avoid using GPS.
I complain about you being biased, so maybe I should buy a little Binkov to use as a voodoo doll
To laser a high-altitude satellite I guess you would need 1.21 GIGAWATTS? 😜
Think it through, the power is only needed for nanoseconds.
It only works if the satellite is going 88mph
Is the need to update the satellites another vulnerability?
GPS satellites have their positions tracked by a whole series of tracking stations and the satellites then need to be told their own new position data, which itself is not easy because they are far away. If something interfered with/sabotaged the tracking or updating for Glonass, that would be a serious issue. And given that the US has bases all over the world, they have a lot more tracking locations to use. Would this make a difference?
Haha. USA will never try to do it, simply becouse they know if Russia will do the same, USA army will be like newborn kitty.
When the time comes they will have to do it.
USA has more to lose.
True, US advantage and maybe also disadvantage is their over-reliance on modern technology
HOW ARE YOU ASKING WHAT WOULD IT TAKE TO DISABLE.....IT DOESNT WORK NOW!
Are you just very under educated or rage bait?
@@donetski7324I think a mixture of both
go look at his comments lmao
shit is so funny
Just send in the f15. 104-0 look out below, smoked a satellite just for show
why is Galileo which far superior to GPS not reviewed ?
Because Glonass is far superior
Didn't the film gravity made fan of russia for trying the same thing ? Now who's the fool
Why disable Glonoss and not US GPS?
I think less people are aware Glonass exists than they are aware that GPS exists, so makes for a more interesting title, also Ukraine has 2 options (Galileo & GPS) so it would be harder to destroy both. But you know what you were thinking when you asked that question, you were thinking that he talks about Glonass because he is biased, which is also probably true
@Ekstrax my question was more: why discuss the weaknesses of Russia Infrastructure. Surely a better balanced view is, what are the weaknesses of all GPS systems.
I do suppose I am making it political, as I don't think either the west or Russia gets a balanced view of World issues or positions just their own propaganda.
cuz magog
Surveillance and communication satellites are the target, not gps
In the future, I could see a stealth military Starship as a possibility. Once you have that, there are many options available.
Van Allen radiation belt
no such thing as stealth in space.
@@Alex.Holland So, maneuvering using cold gas thrusters and covering the exterior in radar absorbing material would do nothing? We're not talking about Romulan cloaking device here, just significantly reduced observability and radar cross section. My bet is that DARPA already has the tech.
@@gregkelly2145 the entire world would know exactly where it was because of the launch, and could track it if they wanted to.
@@gregkelly2145it would reflect light regardless, a telescope would be able to see it
Fanboys dont know the west is now seen as an embarrassment 😂
*Bot Detected*
Yep, all those sanctions and the biggest losers, due to the sanctions, are the West.
@@Ekstrax Coper detected.
NaT0 panic mode lol
NATO doesn't need to panic, Russia can't fight its way out of a paper bag and the west is enjoying watching the Russian military and economy evaporate. How desperate do you need to be to go ask North Korea for soldiers? 🤣🤣
@@jsncrso The Russians have slaughtered the Nat0 created armed and led military of the Ukraine every pathetic Nat0 game changer weapon has failed but you guys keep cope alive lol
@@mrpilkington9710 Day 850+ of the 3 day SMO. Yes, it looks like Ukrainian forces have been totally smashed.
@@nigelgarrett7970 I do Love the pathetic nafo talking point of the 3 day war that was never stated by Russia only by nato propaganda outlets though for time tables the ukie military said last year they will be in Crimea in 3 weeks they made it a foot and a half forward lost tens of thousands of men and all the western super duper weapons they were given that year LMFO