Locking tuners should be on all guitars manufactured today! Save time and less tuning problems. I have change for locking tuners on all of my guitars and never look back :) Thanks for the video!
I used to think that they're bullshit. But I installed Schaller locking tuners on my Ibanez RG (fixed bridge) and it was a dream. Stays in tune like a well oiled machine.
They're getting more ubiquitous. I like the idea of putting them on all guitars from the factory because, if you don't like locking tuners, you can always either take out the thumbscrews in which case they're normal tuners or string up like you normally would and then tighten the thumbscrews just enough to avoid rattle.
1 thing to consider when installing new strings with lock tuners is what tuning you will be using or if you will be constantly using different tunings. If you plan on going from c standard to e standard for example maybe give it a single wind around the tuning post before slotting, especially on the thicker strings as they move more while tuning. Idk if I explained this all too well but hey.
@@jeffrey6129 i'm pretty sure you can just tune to the range of the lower tuning - you can always tune up (within reason), but once you clip your string, you're limited on how low it'll go before running out of string 🤷♂you can always leave a little more slack than you need, it doesn't hurt anything - but too much slack kind of defeats the purpose of having locking tuners
The (maybe) improved tuning stability off locking tuners is a nice little added bonus. But the time and hassle they save you on re-stringing your guitar is what makes them a must have in my opinion. EVERY good guitar should come with locking tuners IMO. Even if it's a FR-Model with a locking nut.
IKR? Carefully winding your strings, pulling on them to make sure they stay in tune, nobody's got time for that. I love my Gotoh Magnums, They save so much time and I would never go back to regular tuners.
As far as tuning stability goes, I’m amazed at how many guitarists don’t know how to stretch their strings in properly. Good video!! Thanks for the info on locking tuners, man!
Yep, I saw Herman Li explaining this on twitch. He says this is one of the reasons many people don't understand/like Floyd Rose bridges, you have to stretch the string before tuning it or it will go out of tune when you use the whammy.
Once I got a guitar with locking tuners I was sold. I put them on my Christmas list for my other guitars. Getting older my eyes don't focus like they used to, my hands are a little shaky and I'm just a bit more clumsy in general. With locking tuners, if I can hit the hole I'm done.
I think what people mistake for string stretch is really the string taking a while to form the bends that the string must make at the bridge, nut and where it meets the tuning peg. One can speed this process greatly for a new string by pressing down on string in front of bridge saddles and on both sides of the nut and also press on the string at the tuner to help it make that tight 90 degree bend. Do this and you will greatly reduce the time it takes a new string to become stable.
I think the thing I love most about my locking tuners is that they've made it much easier to change strings on my Bigsby-equipped guitars (to the point where I don't feel like I need two other people)
Unless your guitar has a locking nut then locking tuners should be a given improvement. Honestly even though it seems like overkill, locking tuners on a guitar with a locking nut can offer easier string changes overall.
I just installed my first set of locking tuners (Grover) on an Epiphone LP. I fell in love with them if only for how quickly it enables you to change strings. I have since ordered 5 more sets to install on all my Fender guitars.
I've noticed an improvement to my tuning stability on guitars with a tremolo system, even when accounting for lubricating the nut and saddles etc. I'm not saying it went from awful to perfect, but it was noticeable to my ears and confirmed with a strobe tuner
@@wyssmaster I recently got a guitar with a tremolo, are you saying I'll have less problems going out of tune with these tuners than with the tuners that came with the guitar.
@@PenguinNoodleSoup If your guitar has a standard non-locking tremolo! Tuning is more stable not having to wrap the string around the post! Btw the way if you have a locking trem, they were designed to help the guitar stay in tune! And once the guitar is in tune the nut is locked now making the tuner irrelevant! All fine tuning is made from the bridge location!
This is so much better, i hate changing strings on my non locking tuners, getting the wrap around right is a real pain, locking tuners is definitely the way to go!
I'm doing a total mod on a '97 Squire Affinity Strat. Between proper winding and stretching I don't have slipping issues at the tuners but with this mod I DO have an upper budget limit. Skipping a feature I don't need gives me a bit more money to put into pickups. Thanks for the video!
In this case though... There's really not much added.. just the lock knob, lol... I've had them on several guitars for years.. And I ain't goin back! The time saving alone is enough.. now I don't even need to have a cutter.
I have 12 guitars in my collection. I changed all of them with lockers. Best thing I ever did. A lot of touring guitar techs had their own method of stringing strings which drove me crazy.
One of the biggest misconceptions and myths of the guitar world (and there are a *lot* ), is that locking tuners directly increase tuning stability and will fix all tuning problems. That is not the case. The _only_ reason a locking tuner might help tuning stability is that there are no wraps around the pole piece that can expand and contract. If you have too many windings around a normal tuning post and they overlap, the strings will start to expand and contract against each other adding to the friction at the contact points and the possibility that they will not return back to proper pitch. The expensive locking tuners are also usually made of high quality material and are better made compared to the tuners getting replaced so that also adds to the misconceptions. String slippage will rarely, if ever at all, occur with a proper over/under etc. string locking technique and normal tuners. The nut and bridge have much more to do with tuning stability than the tuners themselves, and those are often the offenders when it comes to tuning problems. The biggest plus, and intention, of locking tuners is to significantly decrease the amount of time it takes to change strings. They make the process so fast and efficient. Gigging musicians who change their strings regularly or who are on tour will benefit the most from them, but for hobby bedroom players who don't do changes frequently (weekly/monthly) it's a decision to make if the expense it worth it because they are more of a convenience item and they don't give as much of a practical tuning stability increase as others tend to believe. The nut and bridge. Those are the focus points unless it's clear and obvious the tuners are worn out and the gears themselves are slipping due to wear.
A long long time ago, in a galaxy far far away, I thought locking tuners meant that they locked into whatever pitch... In other words, you couldn't turn the knob, and it couldn't move up or down. ... Such duhh.
I use them on my Fender Strats in order to reduce tuning issues. Otherwise, I stick to the popular standard brand tuners if replacements are needed. But keep in mind it is only just one step in correcting possible tuning issues. As was briefly mentioned the string nut and bridge can also be a source of tuning issues depending on the design and condition and amount of wear over time.
I hadn't tried locking tuners until I started buying Carvin guitars about ten years ago. I absolutely love them when it comes time to change strings. It takes me about 1/4 the time that it usually would. As far as staying in tune better… I'd say that in my experience they're a little better, but I wouldn't expect a giant difference.
Based on your description I was convinced I didn't care to upgrade. But after watching you actually change the string, I'm 100% sold. My headstocks have a bunch of scratches on them from me wrapping the strings around. With locking tuners I won't have to worry about that.
Locking tuners are a good upgrade but what a lot of players overlook is the nut. I always use graphite or pencil lead in the string grooves when replacing strings because graphite is a natural lubrication when friction is involved with metal or any other hard material.
I heard about that graphite in the nut slots when I was gigging years ago and yep, saves the strings from sticking there. Especially helpful with a Strat+trem. Great shout out.
I have a 1991 Fender Stratplus and the Schaller locking tuners work the same as the day i got it, no problems. I had to tighten up the buttons a couple of times but that's it. Just bought some Fender stamped locking tuners for my MIM player Tele, going to get them tomorrow.
I'm a vintage tuner guy for Strats and Teles. Gotoh makes a great locking tuner that looks the same at a glance and adds almost no mass. I discovered them on my first Grosh and use them on all my builds now. Plus, ease of string changes compared to the old vintage with the hole hole in the top is a major improvement for me, but I'm a klutz.
Locking tuners are awesome and I put them on all my guitars. They're nice on six strings but an absolute necessity for extended range guitars. They're a lot cheaper nowadays, too, with good quality tuners being available for less than $30
i am slightly dyslexic ...and for nearly 40 yrs ...i have always had trouble changing strings...cant tell if i have wrapped them under or over ...how many winds ...or even which way to go ...locking tuners are a real godsend ....i know they didnt market them for me ..but i am once happy camper with these on my axes
Just replaced my gforce auto tuner on my LP with locking Grover’s, I’m in love, next guitar to get this up grade will be my Strat. Every guitar should come standard with these. I won’t put them on my Taylor but on my electric guitars....yeah.
I just did the same thing. GForce tuners look good on paper, but I couldn't bond with them. I put a set of Kluson Revolution locking tuners on my Les Paul. I really like them and I plan on putting a set on my SG.
I have Sperzel locking tuners on my Squier Pro Tone. They are some of the original locking tuners on the market and they weren't cheap. I recommend them on guitars with tremelos and they definitely make string change easier. My strat will stay near perfect tune for weeks at a time but I am not sure I would put them on a high end or vintage guitar or Acoustic although they would work great. Remember the bridge and nut can also affect tuning stability but good tuners are a big help. Cheap tuners with backlash in the gears will be problematic locking or not although you can now find decent tuners without spending an arm or leg like I did.
I'm a gigging guitarist and I have them for the sole purpose of making on-the-fly string break changes faster. I haven't found them to be more or less stable than normal tuners in terms of tuning, but they're definitely more convenient and worth having for your gigging/most frequently played guitars.
I have an old Peavey Predator that I could not keep in tune when using the tremolo so I hard tailed it. I'm putting locking tuners on it and will be freeing up the tremolo. Plus I'm installing Rose pickups with a blender circuit. Should be fun...
I don't have any problems with tuning stability with any of my guitars. I just stretch them good when I change them. The only benefit of locking tuners is if you have multiple guitars, and you change the strings in them every month. Locking tuners will save time when you change strings, or if you break one, on stage. I always use 18:1 standard tuners.
Never having an issue with tuning stability on my Gibson SG. No locking tuners. Just properly slotted nut. My G&L USA Legacy Special has Sperzel Locking tuners and i like it because of how easy to change strings. Locking tuners to me is just a supplement to a properly slotted nut and faster string changes.
I got a set of Gotohs on my ESP CTM and they are awesome! I wish I had tried them a long time ago! Now I just need a set for my Les Pauls. Maybe be able to get that damn G string ghost out of them.
I agree. A locking tuner does nothing more than save you the hassle of correctly wrapping the string around the tuners. There is no string slippage if one correctly wraps the strings. Also given the gear ration the act of increasing tension on strings cannot possibly unwind the strings or cause it to slip. Most tuning problems arise from the string binding at the nut and not stretching strings correctly. Most people would benefit more from installing a TUSQ nut and removing the string trees.
As one who repairs and upgrades guitars, if you are going to upgrade the nut to a TUSQ, then also upgrade the trees to either the TUSQ equivalent, or use polished roller trees. The angle of the strings under the trees are there for a reason. When you remove the trees completely, the angle is changed in relation to the nut and you may get unwanted harmonic overtones, or a kind of sitar effect. Good video and info, StringJoy.
@@Sandarpan Sometimes staggered tuners won't get you out of the mud, I prefer using one good quality string tree on the e and B strings (on a strat). String tree location is important too! Too far from the nut it's useless, too close and you get more tuning problems.
Just put locking tuners on my strat it stayed in tune well before and still does the main difference is a full string change takes a couple of minutes from none to on and stretched and tuned and that alone is worth the money being able to change a set twice as fast oh and no need for string trees which is also a nice bonus
Using a 7 string in drop F with a 74 for your low F string basically makes locking tuners a necessity. Especially when played aggressively. I’m going to upgrade to them immediately.
I put locking tuners on most of my better guitars and certainly all my work guitars. It makes changing strings so much easier and faster. Out tune problems I always blamed the nut and I put bone nuts on all of my guitars. I noticed some of my work guitars still went in and out there of tune. When you did a few bends the post wrap would loosen up and tighten up. It was the tuners and replacing them fix that. Another great video Steve.
I have vintage style fender, standard fender, and locking style fender tuners. I really like the fender locking tuners the best. I wish they could make them look like the vintage tuners but we can't always get what we want.
I use locking tuners but I actually do wrap the string around the post once because I've got flat wounds and I don't trust that clamp to hold a flatwound down. That said I wind it around the peg twice, *then* run it through the peg hole and then clamp it down. Then it's tuned in just a few turns.
Love my locking tuners. I use them on my Sheraton hollow body and my Takamine acoustic.My main reason is quick string changes as I change strings for every gig and if I have 2 gigs in a day ( summer weekends) I'll change the D and G between gigs as I break these a lot!.
Scott , I was the person who asked for this video. Thanks for the time & effort. You answered all my questions about locking guitar tuners. I've been playing guitar for almost forty years & your videos have addressed many issues i have always been curious about. I've used another companies strings for most of my playing years but have been very pleased to make the switch to Stringjoy.
I feel like it only makes sense if you change strings regularly. And even then, having a winding key would do the job just as well and you can use it on all guitars so... eh.
I just got a Mitchell ms450 it came with lock ing tuners haven't changed the strings yet on my other guitars I have standard tuners l use a Luthierknot when l put on new strings never had a problem with slipping or staying in tune, the lock ln tuners are kinda nifty 🎶🎵
I bought a Suhr-Strat with locking tuners, and the tuning stability is Phenomenal. It's light-years ahead and far-superior to my vintage Fender Stratocaster = honesty. oNe LoVe from NYC
When you've got a lot of guitars, the time saving alone is great, like someone mentioned that if you have to do several at once.. way, WAY faster. Pull it tight through the hole.. lock the back, and with the tuners I have been getting, I don't even need the cutter anymore! Done! Fastest string change ever! It's CONSIDERABLY faster... Not just by a little bit.
Let’s...not give the manufacturers an excuse to start making crappy locking tuners vs “these higher quality $125 sets”. If locking tuners came on all of them there’d be people in suits to exploit the market and we’d lose.
I put locking tuners on all my guitars. Even my acoustics. If your guitar uses cheap tuners and you upgrade with good locking tuners, you'll notice a change for the better. But there are good non locking tuners that function as well as locking tuners. Even still you gain the advantage of being easier to change strings with locking tuners so it's a win win for not much money. I think grover locking 502c are the best.
Just got my first guitar with locking tuners. It seems to me that any alternate tuning (other than perhaps drop D) would be problematic with locking tuners due to not enough slack or extra being left on the tuning pegs. Thoughts, anyone?
I am about to install locking tuners and am wondering the same thing. I play open tunings and am considering a little slack in the string to accommodate the different tensions. Anyone else do this?
Is there a practical reason other than cost for some of the bowed string instruments to keep having friction-based tuners rather than gear-based tuners?
Heh. I remember a Peanuts comic from back in the day ... Charlie Brown says to Linus, "Well, my dad finally figured out what that lever under the dash of his new car was for. It was one more thing to go wrong."
The only reason i would consider putting them on would be if locking tuners would hold better tuning while using tremolo bar. I imagine the wraps wouldn't loosen or tighten because you don't really need to wrap the strings. Would a roller nut and locking tuners be best for this desired outcome?
Hey Brother. Your vid was the most instructive vid on the locking tuners. Thank you. I appreciate the pros and cons, gotta have those. Thank you again. Dirt
One drawback is that if you change tunings on the fly, your string will break. The spooling effect of "normal" will let you tune up and down without the temper break occurring. I used to use Sperzels but now I use ratio "normal" tuners.
Did you know some of The Schaller type sealed tuners tout themselves as locking tuners as well. It's claimed that after you tune them up, you simply tighten the tiny Phillips head screw on the end of the tuning peg handle and it locks it down. Seemed to work for alot of units. Give it a try.
I’ve been playing professionally for 20 years, and I’ve always used the old school Kluson tuners because they look cool, but I finally got sick of tuning all 6 strings after EVERY song. I’ve had locking tuners on my #1 for a little over a month now, and while the tuning stability is no longer an issue at all, the added weight from the headstock is definitely distracting during solos, especially in the upper registers, and my left-hand vibrato isn’t as loose as I like.
I think it depends on the situation if they're worth it or not. For example, if you buy a lower end guitar that comes with cheap tuners that don't stay in tune very well, it'd be worth upgrading the tuners to at least some better quality tuners, and while you're at it you could get locking tuners if you wanted them. Or if you have a decent quality, but still doesn't stay in tune very well, like a Gibson style guitar, then locking tuners might help fix that. Also if you have a strat or a guitar with a strat style trem system, locking tuners might help with the tuning stability.
I have used locking tuners for years on electric guitars and find that they work quite well. I wonder in the long term if the pin mechanism may get worn out. I also wonder whether the signal is slightly “degraded” because of the lack of the mass around the string post.
I had been playing guitar for 2 1/2 years before someone clued me in about stretching strings. I thought I had a crappy guitar, it just turns out that nobody ever taught me how to change strings the right way. Ever since I got my first set of locking tuners, I've made it a priority to put them on every guitar I own. Changing strings the old fashioned way feels really tedious once you've gotten used to them.
Thanks, Stringjoy. I got my set in the mail (gold with pearl handles) and I thought they were just toys. Very small, no directions included, and the pearl handles are quite small as though built for a Fender Strat or something! I like how you said "trying to determine" because I'm still not sure.
With standard tuners I have a hard time changing strings because I have had them break on me while putting them on. I might switch to locking tuners so I can put them on and then tune them.
Nice overview and advice regarding locking tuners. I've been considering changing out the Kluson turners on my 2010 Gibson Les Paul '52 Tribute to locking turners. I'm not a big fan of changing strings and also not that crazy about the Kluson's (both look and function). I like the idea of locking tuners making the restring job faster and easier. I am looking at the Gotoh SD90-MGT-05M Magnum Lock Vintage Locking Tuners as they appear to be drop in replacements or pretty close to it. Your review has provided a lot I need to know about using them correctly. Thanks again.
Major advantage: I'm very lazy when changing my strings...I hate it! Got my eye on some Grover Roto-Grips.😁 Doubt I'll notice the weight on my Les Paul.
I know a lot of people are really swearing by the evertune system, have you had any experience with that and how it might help keep your guitar in tune even better?
I just recently switched to locking tuners and i feel like the stock tuners on my guitar were just as good but idk how to wrap the strings around the tuners properly and the locking tuners make changing strings a breez so I like them a lot just for that lol
With Schaller locking tuners I always had tuning issues and needed to lock my nut every time after a string change (my guitar has a Floyd Rose Original). That's why I bought a Grover set of locking tuners and the problem remains the same. In conclusion: locking tuners are just good when you need to restring your guitar, it's just super easy but it does nothing more!
i had a lot of problem with tuning stability on my epi wildkat (expecially when using the bigsby) and i thought i needed locking tuners. turns out i just needed to lube the nut with grapite and give the strings a good stretch. now i can play for hours and use the bigsby all the time without having to tune the guitar. i think that if you already have nice tuners (the wildkat has groovers) the only reason to get locking tuners would be to restring faster
will i be able to easily swap to alternate tunings? as in low E string to D or to F, worried about the small amount of slack leftover when used with a locking tuner
No problem! I have Grover locking tuners, and tuning down to D is no problem. When you pull a string through the peg hole, and then lock it with the rear thumbscrew clasp, the string is too floppy to even produce an audible note, so the lowest pitch for any string is “floppy”. Just be sure to not pull the string too tight before you lock it, which would require about 15 lbs of tension to pull a 10 gauge string to D. Not likely
Part of the theory of locking tuners it removes the need to wrap the strings around the pegs. The wraps will give the strings a chance to relax and detune. Besides, you can buy locking tuners on Amazon for less than 20 dollars. I have found that they are of similar quality to an expensive set of grovers or whatever other big brand
Oh for sure! And I didn't know they came that cheap on Amazon. I will say I've almost never had a positive experience with a cheap product on Amazon (it's all just knock off Chinese goods), but YMMV.
Thanks for watching! If you're trying to determine whether locking tuners are the right move for you, I hope this video is helpful!
They make it so they will SlipKnot. (Sorry for the pun) But now when I get locking tuners, I know how too change them correctly.
That's all that counts!
yep
Why did you show the wrong way?
I put some locking tuners on my guitar. When tuned it up the High E broke when i got to D#, I'm using 9's. Does anyone have a solution to this?
"add a little weight"
*looks at my Les Paul*
Change to les Paul jr
My Strats weights 5kg..I feel you man
hahahaha
@@redfox7497 strats are nowhere near as heavy as les pauls lol
@@redfox7497 kg? What is this in freedom units?
Locking tuners should be on all guitars manufactured today! Save time and less tuning problems. I have change for locking tuners on all of my guitars and never look back :) Thanks for the video!
I do dig them as well, largely for convenience sake on my end. May look to add some to one or two other guitars eventually.
I used to think that they're bullshit. But I installed Schaller locking tuners on my Ibanez RG (fixed bridge) and it was a dream. Stays in tune like a well oiled machine.
They're getting more ubiquitous. I like the idea of putting them on all guitars from the factory because, if you don't like locking tuners, you can always either take out the thumbscrews in which case they're normal tuners or string up like you normally would and then tighten the thumbscrews just enough to avoid rattle.
karol walczak I agree.
No one makes locking tuners that look the same as the current tuners on my guitar.
1 thing to consider when installing new strings with lock tuners is what tuning you will be using or if you will be constantly using different tunings. If you plan on going from c standard to e standard for example maybe give it a single wind around the tuning post before slotting, especially on the thicker strings as they move more while tuning. Idk if I explained this all too well but hey.
Excellent point.
Thanks
Is there a vid that explains how to do it properly?
you explained it fine. i like to go between standard and dadgad and was already keeping that in mind
@@jeffrey6129 i'm pretty sure you can just tune to the range of the lower tuning - you can always tune up (within reason), but once you clip your string, you're limited on how low it'll go before running out of string 🤷♂you can always leave a little more slack than you need, it doesn't hurt anything - but too much slack kind of defeats the purpose of having locking tuners
I got myself locking tuners on one of my guitars and they do the job! I' m bending strings all the time and stay tune 98% .
lol, I'll get em cause now if I even look at my whammy bar, all the strings change anywhere from 1 to 4 steps IN EITHER DIRECTION
@@Phyoomz Your intonation is way off. Maybe truss rodd as well. Also make sure Rose is paralell to the guitar body.
locking tuner is heaven if you having a few guitars to restring at the same time.
I believe that! It certainly speeds things up.
The (maybe) improved tuning stability off locking tuners is a nice little added bonus. But the time and hassle they save you on re-stringing your guitar is what makes them a must have in my opinion.
EVERY good guitar should come with locking tuners IMO. Even if it's a FR-Model with a locking nut.
IKR? Carefully winding your strings, pulling on them to make sure they stay in tune, nobody's got time for that. I love my Gotoh Magnums, They save so much time and I would never go back to regular tuners.
locking tuners have nothing to do with locking nut!
As far as tuning stability goes, I’m amazed at how many guitarists don’t know how to stretch their strings in properly. Good video!! Thanks for the info on locking tuners, man!
Yep, I saw Herman Li explaining this on twitch.
He says this is one of the reasons many people don't understand/like Floyd Rose bridges, you have to stretch the string before tuning it or it will go out of tune when you use the whammy.
Once I got a guitar with locking tuners I was sold. I put them on my Christmas list for my other guitars. Getting older my eyes don't focus like they used to, my hands are a little shaky and I'm just a bit more clumsy in general. With locking tuners, if I can hit the hole I'm done.
I'm all about anything that makes life easier!
Hitting the hole usually gets it done for me too. Sorry, I can't pass up an opportunity to make a dirty joke.
@@teakvandergarderen2973 thanks beavis....huh ...cool
that's what she said...
I think what people mistake for string stretch is really the string taking a while to form the bends that the string must make at the bridge, nut and where it meets the tuning peg. One can speed this process greatly for a new string by pressing down on string in front of bridge saddles and on both sides of the nut and also press on the string at the tuner to help it make that tight 90 degree bend. Do this and you will greatly reduce the time it takes a new string to become stable.
this is exactly right.
Love my locking tuners. Makes changing strings so easy, and yes they stay in tune much better.
I think the thing I love most about my locking tuners is that they've made it much easier to change strings on my Bigsby-equipped guitars (to the point where I don't feel like I need two other people)
Unless your guitar has a locking nut then locking tuners should be a given improvement. Honestly even though it seems like overkill, locking tuners on a guitar with a locking nut can offer easier string changes overall.
hell, get locking tuners and a locking nut!
@@pineapplej7310 I'd rather go with locking tuners and rolling nut+saddles, eliminate all the friction
damn! locking tuners do not lock string length, absolutely nothing to do with nut
Never thought i would care about locking tuners until i got some. Would never go back now.
I just installed my first set of locking tuners (Grover) on an Epiphone LP. I fell in love with them if only for how quickly it enables you to change strings. I have since ordered 5 more sets to install on all my Fender guitars.
damn send me the good tuners you take off
I've been playing since the 1960s and my luthier has converted me to locking tuners just today. Thanks for the helpful video.
The best thing about locking tuners is how easy it makes changing your strings. I don't see a huge advantage otherwise.
Sean Oxton +1
I've noticed an improvement to my tuning stability on guitars with a tremolo system, even when accounting for lubricating the nut and saddles etc. I'm not saying it went from awful to perfect, but it was noticeable to my ears and confirmed with a strobe tuner
Most tuning problems are a result of a bad nut or improper depth/width cuts in the nut.
@@wyssmaster I recently got a guitar with a tremolo, are you saying I'll have less problems going out of tune with these tuners than with the tuners that came with the guitar.
@@PenguinNoodleSoup If your guitar has a standard non-locking tremolo! Tuning is more stable not having to wrap the string around the post! Btw the way if you have a locking trem, they were designed to help the guitar stay in tune! And once the guitar is in tune the nut is locked now making the tuner irrelevant! All fine tuning is made from the bridge location!
This is so much better, i hate changing strings on my non locking tuners, getting the wrap around right is a real pain, locking tuners is definitely the way to go!
Absolutely solved my tuning issues with a Les Paul and a Jackson with Floyd Rose tremolo.
nonsense, you must have had poor quality tuners before , or you were not stringing them properly
I'm doing a total mod on a '97 Squire Affinity Strat. Between proper winding and stretching I don't have slipping issues at the tuners but with this mod I DO have an upper budget limit. Skipping a feature I don't need gives me a bit more money to put into pickups. Thanks for the video!
So true about how having more things going on means more things there are to go wrong.
In this case though... There's really not much added.. just the lock knob, lol... I've had them on several guitars for years.. And I ain't goin back! The time saving alone is enough.. now I don't even need to have a cutter.
I have 12 guitars in my collection. I changed all of them with lockers. Best thing I ever did. A lot of touring guitar techs had their own method of stringing strings which drove me crazy.
One of the biggest misconceptions and myths of the guitar world (and there are a *lot* ), is that locking tuners directly increase tuning stability and will fix all tuning problems. That is not the case. The _only_ reason a locking tuner might help tuning stability is that there are no wraps around the pole piece that can expand and contract. If you have too many windings around a normal tuning post and they overlap, the strings will start to expand and contract against each other adding to the friction at the contact points and the possibility that they will not return back to proper pitch. The expensive locking tuners are also usually made of high quality material and are better made compared to the tuners getting replaced so that also adds to the misconceptions. String slippage will rarely, if ever at all, occur with a proper over/under etc. string locking technique and normal tuners. The nut and bridge have much more to do with tuning stability than the tuners themselves, and those are often the offenders when it comes to tuning problems. The biggest plus, and intention, of locking tuners is to significantly decrease the amount of time it takes to change strings. They make the process so fast and efficient. Gigging musicians who change their strings regularly or who are on tour will benefit the most from them, but for hobby bedroom players who don't do changes frequently (weekly/monthly) it's a decision to make if the expense it worth it because they are more of a convenience item and they don't give as much of a practical tuning stability increase as others tend to believe. The nut and bridge. Those are the focus points unless it's clear and obvious the tuners are worn out and the gears themselves are slipping due to wear.
A long long time ago, in a galaxy far far away, I thought locking tuners meant that they locked into whatever pitch... In other words, you couldn't turn the knob, and it couldn't move up or down.
... Such duhh.
@@atakdragonfly1675 that's me 10 min ago lol.
Yes, they are great. Especially for fast string changes.
I use them on my Fender Strats in order to reduce tuning issues. Otherwise, I stick to the popular standard brand tuners if replacements are needed. But keep in mind it is only just one step in correcting possible tuning issues.
As was briefly mentioned the string nut and bridge can also be a source of tuning issues depending on the design and condition and amount of wear over time.
I hadn't tried locking tuners until I started buying Carvin guitars about ten years ago. I absolutely love them when it comes time to change strings. It takes me about 1/4 the time that it usually would. As far as staying in tune better… I'd say that in my experience they're a little better, but I wouldn't expect a giant difference.
Based on your description I was convinced I didn't care to upgrade. But after watching you actually change the string, I'm 100% sold. My headstocks have a bunch of scratches on them from me wrapping the strings around. With locking tuners I won't have to worry about that.
Yep they're pretty handy in that way
Changing your strings in a few minutes is priceless. Stick it, clamp it, cut it, turn it, DONE.
100 percent worth it. I swapped Fender Player series tuners for the Fender locking and Wow it stays in tune a ton better.
nonsense
Hi from England. Locking tuners. I have them on all my guitars. Stainless steel frets yes, roller bridge yes, zero fret yes.
Locking tuners are a good upgrade but what a lot of players overlook is the nut. I always use graphite or pencil lead in the string grooves when replacing strings because graphite is a natural lubrication when friction is involved with metal or any other hard material.
Good call!
I heard about that graphite in the nut slots when I was gigging years ago and yep, saves the strings from sticking there. Especially helpful with a Strat+trem. Great shout out.
I have a 1991 Fender Stratplus and the Schaller locking tuners work the same as the day i got it, no problems. I had to tighten up the buttons a couple of times but that's it. Just bought some Fender stamped locking tuners for my MIM player Tele, going to get them tomorrow.
I'm a vintage tuner guy for Strats and Teles. Gotoh makes a great locking tuner that looks the same at a glance and adds almost no mass. I discovered them on my first Grosh and use them on all my builds now. Plus, ease of string changes compared to the old vintage with the hole hole in the top is a major improvement for me, but I'm a klutz.
I love locking tuners. String changes are so much quicker.
Locking tuners are awesome and I put them on all my guitars. They're nice on six strings but an absolute necessity for extended range guitars. They're a lot cheaper nowadays, too, with good quality tuners being available for less than $30
Thanks man, just picked up a white falcon and it has my first locking tuners. Been playing old school for 45 years, learning still!
i am slightly dyslexic ...and for nearly 40 yrs ...i have always had trouble changing strings...cant tell if i have wrapped them under or over ...how many winds ...or even which way to go ...locking tuners are a real godsend ....i know they didnt market them for me ..but i am once happy camper with these on my axes
Just replaced my gforce auto tuner on my LP with locking Grover’s, I’m in love, next guitar to get this up grade will be my Strat. Every guitar should come standard with these. I won’t put them on my Taylor but on my electric guitars....yeah.
I just did the same thing. GForce tuners look good on paper, but I couldn't bond with them. I put a set of Kluson Revolution locking tuners on my Les Paul. I really like them and I plan on putting a set on my SG.
draw back: when using floyd bridge with locking saddles, you don't have much string left when it breaks
there is if you leave some string when cutting. it is not aesthetically pleasing, but works
I have Sperzel locking tuners on my Squier Pro Tone. They are some of the original locking tuners on the market and they weren't cheap. I recommend them on guitars with tremelos and they definitely make string change easier. My strat will stay near perfect tune for weeks at a time but I am not sure I would put them on a high end or vintage guitar or Acoustic although they would work great. Remember the bridge and nut can also affect tuning stability but good tuners are a big help. Cheap tuners with backlash in the gears will be problematic locking or not although you can now find decent tuners without spending an arm or leg like I did.
I'm a gigging guitarist and I have them for the sole purpose of making on-the-fly string break changes faster. I haven't found them to be more or less stable than normal tuners in terms of tuning, but they're definitely more convenient and worth having for your gigging/most frequently played guitars.
I have an old Peavey Predator that I could not keep in tune when using the tremolo so I hard tailed it. I'm putting locking tuners on it and will be freeing up the tremolo. Plus I'm installing Rose pickups with a blender circuit. Should be fun...
I don't have any problems with tuning stability with any of my guitars. I just stretch them good when I change them. The only benefit of locking tuners is if you have multiple guitars, and you change the strings in them every month. Locking tuners will save time when you change strings, or if you break one, on stage. I always use 18:1 standard tuners.
Never having an issue with tuning stability on my Gibson SG. No locking tuners. Just properly slotted nut. My G&L USA Legacy Special has Sperzel Locking tuners and i like it because of how easy to change strings. Locking tuners to me is just a supplement to a properly slotted nut and faster string changes.
I got a set of Gotohs on my ESP CTM and they are awesome! I wish I had tried them a long time ago! Now I just need a set for my Les Pauls. Maybe be able to get that damn G string ghost out of them.
I agree. A locking tuner does nothing more than save you the hassle of correctly wrapping the string around the tuners. There is no string slippage if one correctly wraps the strings. Also given the gear ration the act of increasing tension on strings cannot possibly unwind the strings or cause it to slip. Most tuning problems arise from the string binding at the nut and not stretching strings correctly. Most people would benefit more from installing a TUSQ nut and removing the string trees.
I completely agree.
As one who repairs and upgrades guitars, if you are going to upgrade the nut to a TUSQ, then also upgrade the trees to either the TUSQ equivalent, or use polished roller trees. The angle of the strings under the trees are there for a reason. When you remove the trees completely, the angle is changed in relation to the nut and you may get unwanted harmonic overtones, or a kind of sitar effect. Good video and info, StringJoy.
@@Majik53 Or use staggered tuners that can keep the correct string angle without trees
@@Sandarpan Excellent point. I have staggerd locking tuners on my mexi-strat.
@@Sandarpan Sometimes staggered tuners won't get you out of the mud, I prefer using one good quality string tree on the e and B strings (on a strat). String tree location is important too! Too far from the nut it's useless, too close and you get more tuning problems.
Just put locking tuners on my strat it stayed in tune well before and still does the main difference is a full string change takes a couple of minutes from none to on and stretched and tuned and that alone is worth the money being able to change a set twice as fast oh and no need for string trees which is also a nice bonus
You would still need trees or a retainer bar if the angles are not right. Unless you got staggered ones.
Using a 7 string in drop F with a 74 for your low F string basically makes locking tuners a necessity. Especially when played aggressively. I’m going to upgrade to them immediately.
I put locking tuners on most of my better guitars and certainly all my work guitars. It makes changing strings so much easier and faster. Out tune problems I always blamed the nut and I put bone nuts on all of my guitars. I noticed some of my work guitars still went in and out there of tune. When you did a few bends the post wrap would loosen up and tighten up. It was the tuners and replacing them fix that. Another great video Steve.
I have vintage style fender, standard fender, and locking style fender tuners. I really like the fender locking tuners the best. I wish they could make them look like the vintage tuners but we can't always get what we want.
I use locking tuners but I actually do wrap the string around the post once because I've got flat wounds and I don't trust that clamp to hold a flatwound down.
That said I wind it around the peg twice, *then* run it through the peg hole and then clamp it down.
Then it's tuned in just a few turns.
I don't get how properly fitted strings would slip off on regular tuners
Love my locking tuners. I use them on my Sheraton hollow body and my Takamine acoustic.My main reason is quick string changes as I change strings for every gig and if I have 2 gigs in a day ( summer weekends) I'll change the D and G between gigs as I break these a lot!.
Scott , I was the person who asked for this video. Thanks for the time & effort. You answered all my questions about locking guitar tuners. I've been playing guitar for almost forty years & your videos have addressed many issues i have always been curious about. I've used another companies strings for most of my playing years but have been very pleased to make the switch to Stringjoy.
I'm so glad to hear it Paul! It's my pleasure, always happy to help. Glad to have you in the family!
Excellent discussion of the pro's and con's and demonstration of proper stringing technique. Thanks!
Glad you enjoyed it Ernest!
Love locking tuners especially on guitars with tremolo bridges.
I feel like it only makes sense if you change strings regularly. And even then, having a winding key would do the job just as well and you can use it on all guitars so... eh.
Wow, now I know why I keep falling down on my left side while playing, ever since I put Grover locking tuners on my LP.
I just got a Mitchell ms450 it came with lock ing tuners haven't changed the strings yet on my other guitars I have standard tuners l use a Luthierknot when l put on new strings never had a problem with slipping or staying in tune, the lock ln tuners are kinda nifty 🎶🎵
Thank you for your very informational video. I really enjoyed watching it because you answered almost ever question I had.
I have never used them before. I would like to get them on my next new guitar
Got them on my Schecter. Work really well.
I bought a Suhr-Strat with locking tuners, and the tuning stability is Phenomenal. It's light-years ahead and far-superior to my vintage Fender Stratocaster = honesty. oNe LoVe from NYC
I have them on my Strat and they are great, can't wait to put some on my Gretsch with a Bigsby. I think it will make string changes way easier.
Quicker to string up after you've done it a few times. Less time = back to playing sooner, after stretching of course. Thank you for the video!
Thanks for watching!
When you've got a lot of guitars, the time saving alone is great, like someone mentioned that if you have to do several at once.. way, WAY faster. Pull it tight through the hole.. lock the back, and with the tuners I have been getting, I don't even need the cutter anymore! Done! Fastest string change ever! It's CONSIDERABLY faster... Not just by a little bit.
Locking 100% without doubt.
Love locking tuners! They make string changes a joy! I don’t see why they don’t come stock on all guitars.
Let’s...not give the manufacturers an excuse to start making crappy locking tuners vs “these higher quality $125 sets”. If locking tuners came on all of them there’d be people in suits to exploit the market and we’d lose.
i hate lockers, the only way i have lockers on a guitar is if they came stock and i sstill put at least two wraps on them anyways
I put locking tuners on all my guitars. Even my acoustics. If your guitar uses cheap tuners and you upgrade with good locking tuners, you'll notice a change for the better. But there are good non locking tuners that function as well as locking tuners. Even still you gain the advantage of being easier to change strings with locking tuners so it's a win win for not much money. I think grover locking 502c are the best.
Just got my first guitar with locking tuners. It seems to me that any alternate tuning (other than perhaps drop D) would be problematic with locking tuners due to not enough slack or extra being left on the tuning pegs. Thoughts, anyone?
I am about to install locking tuners and am wondering the same thing. I play open tunings and am considering a little slack in the string to accommodate the different tensions. Anyone else do this?
Can you change tuning if you have a floating bridge with locked nuts?
I rarely comment on videos but man oh man, what a great, clean content. Cheers!
Is there a practical reason other than cost for some of the bowed string instruments to keep having friction-based tuners rather than gear-based tuners?
I've actually never understood this either. I don't think it's cost so much as it is tradition.
Friction based tuners make me cringe when I turn them I feel like the damn thing is gonna break apart
Yeah I feel the same way....
Yeah, it felt that way with the cello I rented for a couple weeks.
Wow! You did an outstanding job explaining and demonstrating! I’m sold on this! Thank you
Heh. I remember a Peanuts comic from back in the day ... Charlie Brown says to Linus, "Well, my dad finally figured out what that lever under the dash of his new car was for. It was one more thing to go wrong."
The only reason i would consider putting them on would be if locking tuners would hold better tuning while using tremolo bar. I imagine the wraps wouldn't loosen or tighten because you don't really need to wrap the strings. Would a roller nut and locking tuners be best for this desired outcome?
Hey Brother. Your vid was the most instructive vid on the locking tuners. Thank you. I appreciate the pros and cons, gotta have those.
Thank you again.
Dirt
I use locking tuners on all y guitars. They usually work best when I make sure the intonation is right and the strings are stretched.
One drawback is that if you change tunings on the fly, your string will break. The spooling effect of "normal" will let you tune up and down without the temper break occurring. I used to use Sperzels but now I use ratio "normal" tuners.
Did you know some of The Schaller type sealed tuners tout themselves as locking tuners as well. It's claimed that after you tune them up, you simply tighten the tiny Phillips head screw on the end of the tuning peg handle and it locks it down. Seemed to work for alot of units. Give it a try.
I’ve been playing professionally for 20 years, and I’ve always used the old school Kluson tuners because they look cool, but I finally got sick of tuning all 6 strings after EVERY song. I’ve had locking tuners on my #1 for a little over a month now, and while the tuning stability is no longer an issue at all, the added weight from the headstock is definitely distracting during solos, especially in the upper registers, and my left-hand vibrato isn’t as loose as I like.
I plan on getting locking tuners on my new PRS Silver Sky SE. Thanks for the info
waste of money
I'm gonna get some for my 2 les Paul's tired of stringing them up the old way
I think it depends on the situation if they're worth it or not. For example, if you buy a lower end guitar that comes with cheap tuners that don't stay in tune very well, it'd be worth upgrading the tuners to at least some better quality tuners, and while you're at it you could get locking tuners if you wanted them. Or if you have a decent quality, but still doesn't stay in tune very well, like a Gibson style guitar, then locking tuners might help fix that. Also if you have a strat or a guitar with a strat style trem system, locking tuners might help with the tuning stability.
I have locking tuners on all my guitars because it makes string changes so much faster. I even put them on my acoustic too!
I'm considering doing the change-over myself for just this reason...
I have used locking tuners for years on electric guitars and find that they work quite well. I wonder in the long term if the pin mechanism may get worn out. I also wonder whether the signal is slightly “degraded” because of the lack of the mass around the string post.
Your bridge and the bridge saddles have way more impact on your tone and intonation than the string post. Any change in tone is imaginary.
I had been playing guitar for 2 1/2 years before someone clued me in about stretching strings. I thought I had a crappy guitar, it just turns out that nobody ever taught me how to change strings the right way. Ever since I got my first set of locking tuners, I've made it a priority to put them on every guitar I own. Changing strings the old fashioned way feels really tedious once you've gotten used to them.
Thanks, Stringjoy. I got my set in the mail (gold with pearl handles) and I thought they were just toys. Very small, no directions included, and the pearl handles are quite small as though built for a Fender Strat or something! I like how you said "trying to determine" because I'm still not sure.
With standard tuners I have a hard time changing strings because I have had them break on me while putting them on. I might switch to locking tuners so I can put them on and then tune them.
Nice overview and advice regarding locking tuners. I've been considering changing out the Kluson turners on my 2010 Gibson Les Paul '52 Tribute to locking turners. I'm not a big fan of changing strings and also not that crazy about the Kluson's (both look and function). I like the idea of locking tuners making the restring job faster and easier. I am looking at the Gotoh SD90-MGT-05M Magnum Lock Vintage Locking Tuners as they appear to be drop in replacements or pretty close to it. Your review has provided a lot I need to know about using them correctly. Thanks again.
Glad we could help!
Did you end up doing it ??? I'm wondering about doing the same thing on my SG
Major advantage: I'm very lazy when changing my strings...I hate it!
Got my eye on some Grover Roto-Grips.😁 Doubt I'll notice the weight on my Les Paul.
I know a lot of people are really swearing by the evertune system, have you had any experience with that and how it might help keep your guitar in tune even better?
I really want to try one! I haven't yet.
You can’t do bends with them.
@@brianvillage9649 that's actually not true, you can absolutely do bends with them, you just have to set it up differently to allow it
@@Stringjoy The cheapest evertune guitar that I have found is $1,099 and the hardware is $499!
I want one of those Talmans so bad they're so rare and expensive now when they were so cheap years ago
I just recently switched to locking tuners and i feel like the stock tuners on my guitar were just as good but idk how to wrap the strings around the tuners properly and the locking tuners make changing strings a breez so I like them a lot just for that lol
We had the same first car! Mine had the cd changer in the trunk.
With Schaller locking tuners I always had tuning issues and needed to lock my nut every time after a string change (my guitar has a Floyd Rose Original). That's why I bought a Grover set of locking tuners and the problem remains the same. In conclusion: locking tuners are just good when you need to restring your guitar, it's just super easy but it does nothing more!
They have advantages for fixed bridge guitars. Bending issues fixed because wounds dont come loosem etc
That's a win. My Tele came stock with locking tuners and I love them so much, I'm about to put locking tuners on my Les Paul.
i had a lot of problem with tuning stability on my epi wildkat (expecially when using the bigsby) and i thought i needed locking tuners. turns out i just needed to lube the nut with grapite and give the strings a good stretch. now i can play for hours and use the bigsby all the time without having to tune the guitar. i think that if you already have nice tuners (the wildkat has groovers) the only reason to get locking tuners would be to restring faster
I think there are probably a lot of people that go to locking tuners for that reason and I concur, in many cases it can be a bridge or nut issue.
will i be able to easily swap to alternate tunings? as in low E string to D or to F, worried about the small amount of slack leftover when used with a locking tuner
No problem! I have Grover locking tuners, and tuning down to D is no problem. When you pull a string through the peg hole, and then lock it with the rear thumbscrew clasp, the string is too floppy to even produce an audible note, so the lowest pitch for any string is “floppy”. Just be sure to not pull the string too tight before you lock it, which would require about 15 lbs of tension to pull a 10 gauge string to D. Not likely
Everyone is talking about keeping your guitar in tune, but for me the biggest benefit is how much easier it makes string changes.
Part of the theory of locking tuners it removes the need to wrap the strings around the pegs. The wraps will give the strings a chance to relax and detune. Besides, you can buy locking tuners on Amazon for less than 20 dollars. I have found that they are of similar quality to an expensive set of grovers or whatever other big brand
Oh for sure! And I didn't know they came that cheap on Amazon. I will say I've almost never had a positive experience with a cheap product on Amazon (it's all just knock off Chinese goods), but YMMV.
That is a voluptuous vox you've got there!
Thanks! We love it.