Math Trick - Multiply Using Lines!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • This amazing multiplication trick possible has it's origins in Japan -although I have heard arguements it is a Vedic math trick.
    Either way - this trick allows you to multiply two numbers quickly and accurately, using a handy visual method - lines.
    This method does not use any multiplication tables, making it accessible to all learners.
    Part 2 of this video (how to multiply using lines with fives and zeros) is here:
    • Math Trick - multiply ...
    Arithmetic made simple!
    To donate to the tecmath channel:paypal.me/tecmath
    To support tecmath on Patreon: / tecmath
    To buy tecmath mechandise: teespring.com/...

Комментарии • 897

  • @healthandyou4963
    @healthandyou4963 2 года назад +20

    This man just changed my perception towards maths ,I never knew calulationg could be so interesting.Thanks man!

  • @olufred9424
    @olufred9424 3 года назад +8

    Your channel has increased my test scores by so much. Thank you very much 😊

  • @nunu-zo6vz
    @nunu-zo6vz 6 лет назад +25

    I remember being confused at grade four when they taught us this, now looking back to it, it's actually more simple.

  • @Xeidasx
    @Xeidasx 10 лет назад +192

    thank you for showing this to me!!!! i wish they had taught us this in school...

    • @thuglover87
      @thuglover87 10 лет назад +14

      Same here stupid teaching methods were given to us

    • @Dr4g0nW00d
      @Dr4g0nW00d 10 лет назад +4

      they never learn u something useful in school

    • @MrMattbarbs
      @MrMattbarbs 10 лет назад +5

      Grammer might be nice.

    • @EETechs
      @EETechs 9 лет назад +2

      Matt Barbour duuur, thirr nevers learns mes this stuf'SSS. I fur sur dum'.

    • @rajangamkannan9281
      @rajangamkannan9281 7 лет назад

      Xeid

  • @chtitmog
    @chtitmog 10 лет назад +38

    If I knew this when I was a kid, it would have changed the way I saw maths back then. Lol. Great demonstration! :-)

  • @tecmath
    @tecmath  11 лет назад +10

    Correct! It would end up a messy quagmire to work out 8945 x 9854, and for these sorts of cases it is not the quickest method.
    I'd use the vedic math techniques to do those types of calculations.

    • @LuminSSS
      @LuminSSS 3 года назад +1

      @@sumatiranjan126 this is op. wtf r u talking about?

  • @akivaSk
    @akivaSk 3 года назад +2

    I prefer doing it at a table. f.e 212*13:
    2 1 2
    * - - -
    1 | 2 1 2
    3 | 6 3 6
    (Diagonal from the top right corner to the bottom left corner of the result)
    answer: (2)_(1+6)_(2+3)_(6) = 2756
    This is especially better for large numbers

  • @neozinicola7391
    @neozinicola7391 4 года назад +116

    I shocked my teacher when I did this on a test

  • @christiankong5874
    @christiankong5874 5 лет назад +182

    This got patched in the latest update

  • @00gamer2
    @00gamer2 9 лет назад +1

    This is basicly a visualization of the foil method you would use in expanding brackets, and extending that to two numbers i.e. 14 * 12 would be (10 + 4)(10+2) = 100 + 20 + 40 + 8 = 168. Expressing this in a algebraic form is probably more space efficient. Great video, btw.

  • @CaddraLophat
    @CaddraLophat 9 лет назад +7

    That's amazing, Oml thank you maths has never been easier

  • @tecmath
    @tecmath  11 лет назад +3

    Thanks for watching. The reason for the same numbers.....luck I guess (Ididn't know this was the case!).

  • @mquirk00
    @mquirk00 10 лет назад +38

    These get real ridiculous with anything higher. Its meant for smaller multiplication. Doing something like 7895 x 68 can take a whole sheet of paper, and that's a relatively small multiplication problem. The ones demonstrated here are pretty much the ceiling for being a practical method. Even something like 689 x 42 can get pretty out of control on a piece of paper.

  • @cynceresin9791
    @cynceresin9791 11 лет назад +1

    I'm bad in math, but a visual learning and this make since to me. I will now continue practice .

  • @Shadownes
    @Shadownes 10 лет назад +17

    OIH :O I've been shitty at math all my life, this is really the best way to calculate. Thanks mate for uploading :D

    • @itachiuchiha7842
      @itachiuchiha7842 3 года назад

      ?

    • @eeeeoree4973
      @eeeeoree4973 3 года назад

      @@itachiuchiha7842 what are you tryna know bro this comment was 7yo ago mybe before your birth 😂😂😂😅

  • @seesharp53
    @seesharp53 5 лет назад +5

    I've seen this method described elsewhere many times - the examples shown always use low value digits, always. It's when you try something like 97 x 58 that you realise how tedious it gets.

    • @Olnx
      @Olnx 2 года назад

      agreed

    • @Alkis05
      @Alkis05 2 года назад

      High digits alway a problem. Maybe work with complements:
      100 x 60 - 97 x 2 - 3 x 60

    • @Alkis05
      @Alkis05 2 года назад +1

      Or use a different line (eg. dashed line) to represent a line with value 5 instead of 1. That cuts down the max number of lines per digit from 10 to 5.

  • @crazypuppypoker
    @crazypuppypoker 11 лет назад +1

    im in college and have always struggled with multiplication and this is the greatest thing i have ever learned

  • @lavendergaming7830
    @lavendergaming7830 5 лет назад

    I LIKE TO USE LINE BUT I NEVER USE SOME BUT NOW AM LEARNING THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR LETTING ME KNOW TO USE LINE!!!!

  • @sbalogh53
    @sbalogh53 10 лет назад +3

    I just tried it with 427x126 and got the correct answer of 53802. I find the hardest part is lining up the groups correctly, but practice would probably solve that issue.

  • @nigelmoscrop9987
    @nigelmoscrop9987 9 лет назад +16

    How about seven ,eight or nine in the equation , could be a bit messy , I'd say !

  • @ElizesFavorites
    @ElizesFavorites 10 лет назад +3

    This is awesome! Comes in perfect for my exams.
    Thanks for sharing xx

  • @mamuhanzo6791
    @mamuhanzo6791 8 лет назад +80

    what about if any number has a zero ? for example 101x12 or 304x203

    • @user-zb8br6nw3e
      @user-zb8br6nw3e 8 лет назад +1

      do you find out

    • @tacorevenge87
      @tacorevenge87 7 лет назад +14

      Use the vigesimal system mate, that is why the mayas invented it, to deal with the zero, also invented by the mayas.

    • @mamuhanzo6791
      @mamuhanzo6791 7 лет назад

      Arturo Manaia
      ty bro

    • @SirKingHoff
      @SirKingHoff 7 лет назад +13

      whenever you encounter a 0 just leave a space where the line would be drawn if the unit was say 1 instead of 0, then draw a circle and use that. but instead of adding the intersections like you normally would just make that group (thousands, hundreds etc) 0.

    • @moeinmk5262
      @moeinmk5262 7 лет назад +2

      SirKingHoff

  • @edwarddanial2584
    @edwarddanial2584 11 лет назад +1

    you do a great job.I also like to times two #:s by 11 in my head faster than a calculator.simplistic yet unique

  • @willymcbilly635
    @willymcbilly635 10 лет назад +7

    FUCK WHY DID I NOT DISCOVER THIS BEFORE MY EXAMS

  • @ookalar665
    @ookalar665 7 лет назад

    This is a great math trick. I'm going to be writing my ged test in Canada in a couple weeks and this will really help me! Thanks

  • @captainbueno
    @captainbueno 10 лет назад

    This is interesting, and it is worthwhile to look at it for a bit and understand why it works, but on average you will get the answer more quickly with numeric "long" multiplication.

  • @named161
    @named161 2 года назад

    Bro I literally got out of bed and grabbed my graph paper for this one, cheers mate!
    This is Awesome!!!

  • @calderdash9975
    @calderdash9975 3 года назад

    Thanks, think that's one of my favourite, maths tricks of all time.

  • @theempath8244
    @theempath8244 3 года назад

    I have dyscalculia and this has helped me to understand multiplication, so I thank you very much for his video.

  • @jeffkukkee
    @jeffkukkee Год назад

    I'm 40 and just learning this now.... amazing!!

  • @TheDoggirl3
    @TheDoggirl3 4 месяца назад

    Thanks for teaching this new way that I never learned in my school days.

    • @TheDoggirl3
      @TheDoggirl3 4 месяца назад

      Especially when your partially deaf like me.

  • @Snagglefratz
    @Snagglefratz 10 лет назад

    I'm an old dude and I got this right away. It's really cool. It's a shame they didn't teach this when I was in school.

  • @BlindManBert
    @BlindManBert 11 лет назад

    Answer: the intiial examples are typically quite simple and don’t involve both large numbers of crossings (like 19 x 81) or large number of carries in the addition phase. This is one of the limitations of this “graphics crossings” approach, I would say.

  • @mrsricerocket5871
    @mrsricerocket5871 5 лет назад +1

    I love it thank you! Finaly i can get my head around times tables

  • @detroitmade_jts
    @detroitmade_jts 9 лет назад +2

    Thank you.... I tried so hard to figure out the other videos, but with your video it clicked instantly....being a 2014 graduate of High School I wish they'd taught this to those in my class who had a hard time with math.....but thank you once again for sharing some of your knowledge

    • @stus2159
      @stus2159 6 лет назад +1

      You were thinking about teaching people this method?? Are you dense? No wonder our education system is fucked.

  • @justcheryl5568
    @justcheryl5568 4 года назад

    It works and used common sense to adjust to zeros or numbers greater than 8 - very cool

  • @jessicamoneaevans1171
    @jessicamoneaevans1171 3 года назад +1

    This is so awesome. Go explain. My boyfriend not that good in math and this help so much.

  • @suspicious_coconut_water
    @suspicious_coconut_water 2 года назад

    Dude you just helped me learn quick math in my head

  • @maryj9684
    @maryj9684 5 лет назад +2

    I HAVE MY SAT TOMORROW I NEEDED THIS 👊🏿😂😂

  • @Examinx
    @Examinx 10 лет назад

    This is just another form of rewriting the numbers into a sum and multiplying them. For example, the 212*13 can be rewritten as (2*100+1*10+2)*(1*10+3).
    You get 2*1000+(6+1)*100+(2+3)*10+6=2756.
    It's probably quicker to think of how to expand the number, multiply, and add before you do it, since doing something like 212*(10+3) is quicker (2120+636=2756) than expanding everything.
    If you have 9's, you can do subtraction instead. 25*19=25*(20-1)=500-25=475.

  • @BabyTweetyPie13
    @BabyTweetyPie13 11 лет назад +2

    This is amazing! Thanks so much! It's way better doing this method than having to remember the tables c: Really helped with my maths!

  • @janetheostrich
    @janetheostrich 7 лет назад +1

    This just blew my mind - thank you!

  • @rellyfranc9836
    @rellyfranc9836 6 лет назад

    Thank you so much I have struggled for the longest to find a trick that I can understand. Very grateful for this 😬😬

  • @theicedevil
    @theicedevil 2 года назад +1

    This method i can actually do in my head.

  • @Rawrasur
    @Rawrasur 4 года назад

    Omg thank u i have been failling my math classes for the past 3 years 😭😭😭😭 but now i finally understand cuz i found the method that works best for me

    • @tecmath
      @tecmath  4 года назад

      Glad to have helped.

  • @keatoncallaghan3101
    @keatoncallaghan3101 7 лет назад

    this is a massive help for my year 9 exam going into year 10 its really important i nail my times tables
    thanks

  • @aeroga4717
    @aeroga4717 8 лет назад +1

    Thanks i got it, Flawlessly thanks for your exceptional explanation

  • @BlindManBert
    @BlindManBert 11 лет назад

    Very nicely described and nice looking!! I posted a similar discussion in my “Math Rules” channel. Several folks commented out that this technique is not truly Japanese. In fact, it was apparently used to teach kids how to use an abacus perhaps up until thirty years ago, but since then it’s been dropped from the curriculum. So Japanese students today would never be taught this approach. I don’t refer to it as “Japanese” as much as the “graphics crossing” approach for lack of a better name.

  • @laxmimehta4246
    @laxmimehta4246 3 года назад

    AS i am a 10 year old i feel a bit confused at first but then when i watched the video i felt as it this rocked this world!!!!!!!!!

  • @fadelali330
    @fadelali330 2 года назад

    You explained it clearly,thank you

  • @billhart3814
    @billhart3814 10 лет назад +1

    This is in fact a method taught to a school girl in China. She taught it to a guy called Akahad who made a video showing the technique and uploaded it to MetaCafe on Nov 16th 2006. The method only works easily for numbers with small digits, for which the original poster was criticised. However he claimed it was not intended to be an actually efficient method, but only "meant to be a little trick to show to friends and kids who hate maths". Either way, the video was so popular it made $2000 in 4 days. It is said that the school teacher who introduced it did so to get kids interested in maths. The criss-cross pattern was used because it reminded the school children of the stools they sat on. It is absolutely not the Vedic method, definitely not Mayan and quite probably not Japanese. It does not appear to be a traditional Chinese method.

  • @MONKEYBALLZism
    @MONKEYBALLZism 10 лет назад

    So relieved I always hated the other way they teach in school one thing learned today :)

  • @irfangamerhd3394
    @irfangamerhd3394 8 лет назад

    Thanks for showing the maths work

  • @gesunheit
    @gesunheit 11 лет назад

    Super awesome! I'm a person of two things math and complications.

  • @Lace_Loves_Icecream
    @Lace_Loves_Icecream Год назад

    This man just gave me some Knowledge that I will use to confuse my math teacher

  • @matejbanik2505
    @matejbanik2505 4 года назад +1

    Thank you you are better than teachers😁

    • @tecmath
      @tecmath  4 года назад

      I am a teacher. But thanks 😁

  • @guitarlessonsformortalssan8619
    @guitarlessonsformortalssan8619 10 лет назад

    The more ways you have to look at a problem the better, so I'm going to say cool method for building a mental picture.

  • @vaishnavic6632
    @vaishnavic6632 3 года назад

    Great ...first time seen this kind of calculation 👌

  • @petrusvenasiu3630
    @petrusvenasiu3630 3 года назад

    What an amazing method! Thanks for making my life easy

  • @Chalisque
    @Chalisque 11 лет назад

    Try it with 97*76 and compare that with the numeral method. Then do likewise with FD*CE in hex vs doing it numeral by numeral. This is only a nicer method for numbers like 13 and 14 where the individual digits are small.

  • @tecmath
    @tecmath  11 лет назад +2

    Yes - that is a limitation :)

  • @firstnamelastname3743
    @firstnamelastname3743 5 лет назад

    School should really teach this. This japanese technique is really helpful

  • @ProjSHiNKiROU
    @ProjSHiNKiROU 11 лет назад

    To save lines, you can use a thick line to represent a number like 2.

  • @genji2645
    @genji2645 11 лет назад

    Nailed it.!.!.!. I will share this!!

  • @TD-jw4eu
    @TD-jw4eu 10 лет назад +6

    13x14=
    1x1=1
    3+4=7
    3x4=12
    Carry the 1 from the 12 to make the 7 into a 8
    7+1=8
    12-10=2
    13x14=182
    Viola

  • @SaadSuleman
    @SaadSuleman 11 лет назад +2

    Brilliant!!! Wish I knew this when I was at school...... :(

  • @TEE78SR
    @TEE78SR 4 года назад +19

    I like this method, but lost me if there was 0 included I need to see how this works as well on the board???

    • @rileyk5228
      @rileyk5228 4 года назад +1

      Try coloring it a diff color and then not counting those intersections. Or pretend to draw the line and skip to the next spot

    • @sandrabowen8956
      @sandrabowen8956 4 года назад

      @@rileyk5228 thats a great idea lol

    • @nickname3114
      @nickname3114 4 года назад

      Isnt to hard there is no spoon/zero so don't draw a line and put a 0 where a line isnt try 10x12
      One line on the right no lines just a spoon on the left U end up with 012 now you can't have a spoon on the left so swap it to the right that's it 12spoon 😁
      The Matrix there is no 🥄

    • @nickname3114
      @nickname3114 4 года назад +1

      doing higher number is a pain try 6789 19x9, 99x99 is there a trick around this problem to many lines

    • @x7teee
      @x7teee 4 года назад

      Dean Edwards 99 X 100 - 99 lmao

  • @surortaal
    @surortaal 10 лет назад +3

    i must have missed some of your previous videos because i cant find to have a solution for 10 *10 and for numbers smaller than 10 for multiplication, according to this method. can you please help me out on that . i really enjoyed this method of multiplication and do you the same method for addition too.thanks .

  • @josephandthegang9433
    @josephandthegang9433 3 года назад +5

    When my teacher put this on my test I got it wrong LOL

  • @VishantR22
    @VishantR22 11 лет назад

    for multiplication by 9, 99, or 999 etc..
    Eg: 999 * 99
    Step 1: Add two zeros(for two 9's) to 999 = 99900
    Step 2: Subtract 999 from 99900 = 98901
    Step 3 : Congrats, done in two steps :D

  • @frinduangelo4375
    @frinduangelo4375 10 лет назад

    this is realy good and helpful. pritty easy as well

  • @kyellmasarate9654
    @kyellmasarate9654 6 лет назад

    Honestly I dreamed about this after my birthday. Before I saw this I have proof that I made this type of multiplying numbers by myself.
    The dream was so realistic. It really taught me how to do this. After that dream and I woke up I was so nervous try this. But I really tried what I had seen in my dream, and it was true!
    Please, can anyone tell me who invented this because it was just an invention of my dream.

  • @YouAreWrongStopTryin
    @YouAreWrongStopTryin 11 лет назад

    Just by thinking of the method I came up with a way. Draw a single dashed line whenever a zero appears and just do not count any intersections with the dashed line when you add it up. You could just not draw the dashed line, but I would draw it as a place holder so that you don't mess up when circling the different sections.

  • @HanneleKormano
    @HanneleKormano 10 лет назад +1

    An interesting way to visualize multiplication - it looks like magic, but it is no different conceptually from working it out the long way.

  • @meshugunner
    @meshugunner 11 лет назад

    Excellent. Not nearly as fast as using reference numbers or direct multiplication but it's very graphic and clear. It doesn't involve some seemingly magical formula like the Vedic methods. IMO it would be even more striking if the lines for the 10s & 1s were in contrasting colors. I think I will use this to teach my young grandson. Thanks.

  • @honkhonk8009
    @honkhonk8009 9 лет назад +1

    your accent is very relaxing

  • @lavenderlady9942
    @lavenderlady9942 5 лет назад

    If the number is big like 49*85
    Even drawing took so long and the lines are confusing.
    However it works for 1 or 2 digids in value places
    Thanks

  • @winlalitha
    @winlalitha 10 лет назад +1

    Really Really Superb Technique

  • @Xake64
    @Xake64 9 лет назад

    This is going to help me so much with my maths. Thanks man this is going to make a huge difference

  • @Theveryevilturtle
    @Theveryevilturtle 10 лет назад

    So helpful thanks! Since I don't know my times tables (I'm really bad at math) this has really helped! Except my math teacher got mad at me when we did a test the other day and I used a method that he didn't know :/

  • @ZakarooNetwork
    @ZakarooNetwork 6 лет назад

    Thank You Sir. This has Just confirmed genius is Real and Ancient.

  • @thornbottle
    @thornbottle 10 лет назад +7

    I worked out the sums in my head before he even finished drawing the lines.
    14x12 = (10x12) + (4x12) is much faster to do in your head.

    • @lynagranger7486
      @lynagranger7486 4 года назад

      133×177

    • @maskerdasher343
      @maskerdasher343 4 года назад +1

      I was thinking 12x12=144+12=156

    • @XiaoPangZi
      @XiaoPangZi 4 года назад

      @@lynagranger7486 Please try that with lines, we would be done way before with any other method anyway xD

    • @theodoreroosevelt1858
      @theodoreroosevelt1858 4 года назад

      yeah but thoughs are just examples bro soooooo whats 69*420 than in your head

    • @XiaoPangZi
      @XiaoPangZi 4 года назад +1

      @@theodoreroosevelt1858 It's 28'980, why? (yes i did that in my head, there are tricks for this too..) BROOOO...

  • @QuinchGaming
    @QuinchGaming 10 лет назад

    OMFG why wasn't I taught this at school! For "practical" multiplcation solutions this works perfectly.

  • @debadeepdatta
    @debadeepdatta 3 года назад

    Your tricks are super awesome.

  • @louisegreen9312
    @louisegreen9312 10 лет назад

    It is a very good idea, and interesting to use but then think about those, such as those who have dyslexia, who find it hard to look at lines/letters close together - this would make large multiplications impossible. It also doesn't really give much credence to the actual maths behind it/ It's all well and good giving people nifty tricks but then if they need to understand WHY at some point they will come unstuck by continually using these little tricks.

  • @DannnnnyW
    @DannnnnyW 11 лет назад

    Hey thanks for the well instructive informative video. I was firs introduced to this method on RUclips an many of the videos kind of confused me in one way or another. But not your video! It was well executed and I now know this method when combatting multiplication with no fuss thanks to you! *****

  • @pdfdan
    @pdfdan 10 лет назад +5

    What about digits greater than 5? 88 times 77

    • @jirvingnc
      @jirvingnc 10 лет назад

      It still works.. 6776 no calculator here.. 56 carry the 5, 117, carry the 11, and 56+11 = 6776

  • @aimg0d-pubgmobile905
    @aimg0d-pubgmobile905 6 лет назад

    OMG Thanks a lot that will be a very good thing for me to do in school

  • @sandyramzy9015
    @sandyramzy9015 6 лет назад

    Omg yesssss finally the long multiplication in long no calculator tests are gonna be easy

  • @petitio_principii
    @petitio_principii 4 года назад

    I'm quite bad at math, but the conventional way seems way faster to me. I don't get much what gain is there. Maybe if one's really good at visualization one could imagine those lines and add them up just mentally, but I'd be even worse at that than at trying to do the same math by head conventionally. Thanks though, not complaining, I just don't see much the point. Maybe before you have basic times tables known "by heart." For that I knew/know a trick that uses both hands, going only from 6 to 10 though. Basically both hands with all fingers closed in a fist wouls be 10*10; for 9*10 you lift a finger in one hand, for 8*7 you lift a two fingers in one and three in another. Then you multiply the lift fingers for the unit, and add up the closed fingers as tens, and add both results. Maybe one can extend that by imagining to have more fingers or that the toes are doing the same, I haven't tried.

  • @tyleraustinpanton8290
    @tyleraustinpanton8290 6 лет назад

    Thank you so much tecmath, your videos are GREAT keep posting. THANKS.

  • @Mountain_Terror
    @Mountain_Terror 9 лет назад

    You explained it very well, thank you

  • @Mario-pw4pq
    @Mario-pw4pq 6 лет назад

    so cool am gonna master this now

  • @oliversmith8220
    @oliversmith8220 11 лет назад

    Great written method going to use that in my exam but difficult to work out in your head lol :)

  • @dannymcphee
    @dannymcphee 9 лет назад

    Really cool Mr. Tecmath, quite an interesting diversion, and refreshing mental exercise.--Thanx

  • @mtelab4941
    @mtelab4941 10 лет назад

    This is pretty cool, nothing I'd ever use, but very cool :)

  • @meshugunner
    @meshugunner 11 лет назад

    Numbers are hard to come by in Australia. They have to be imported from India and there's a heavy import duty which makes them rare and expensive. Just be grateful for what you have

  • @RachelMcMaster
    @RachelMcMaster 11 лет назад

    This is a great quick way to solve equations! Wonder why we don't do this in England

  • @mitchb6068
    @mitchb6068 6 лет назад

    Our teacher wants us to learn this, this is pretty easy now:)

  • @ChastityBTheEntrepreneur
    @ChastityBTheEntrepreneur 9 лет назад

    OMG!!!! This is phenomenal lol! This makes math that much more fun to do.