@CarPro: The load to weight ratio in the roof crush test - do you have any clue what the top performing vehicles reach? Would 4.66 of the Leading be good - roof certainly looks fine....
Using IIHS's results as a guide, comparable-sized European SUVs are 5.00 - 5.30. It appears that other newer Chinese vehicles vary wildly, but are usually above 4.00 that's needed to earn a "Good" rating.
@@CarPro1993 Okay - that's interesting! Wondering if the reason for that are different goals when designing a vehicle? Or if it has to do with weight increase due to electrification?
I like how they have a rear dummy in the small overlap for driver and passenger test. Did they just recently start testing the passenger side as well?
They've only tested a few models this year for the passenger side, they'll likely do more as time goes on.
@CarPro:
The load to weight ratio in the roof crush test - do you have any clue what the top performing vehicles reach?
Would 4.66 of the Leading be good - roof certainly looks fine....
Volvo XC60 has 5.06, so i guess it's not bad
@@dandiart5383
Oh thank you - that's indeed helpful!!!
Using IIHS's results as a guide, comparable-sized European SUVs are 5.00 - 5.30. It appears that other newer Chinese vehicles vary wildly, but are usually above 4.00 that's needed to earn a "Good" rating.
@@CarPro1993
Okay - that's interesting!
Wondering if the reason for that are different goals when designing a vehicle?
Or if it has to do with weight increase due to electrification?
@@andreasausmuc may be because of glass roof in chineese cars.
Vivió o no vivió??? 😮
Es como si salieran ilesos. Ni siquiera la pantalla del frente se rompió...
Exelente resultado
Как обычно китай и безопасность это далеко ещё
Он получили 5 звёзд из 5
И как ты это понял? 😅
@@muradtagirov7534 по китайским меркам. Посмотрим тест в Европе
Видео похоже не сиоьрели даже
что ты несешь?)))