Let's Solve A Special Polynomial Equation
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 окт 2024
- 🤩 Hello everyone, I'm very excited to bring you a new channel (SyberMath Shorts).
Enjoy...and thank you for your support!!! 🧡🥰🎉🥳🧡
/ @sybermath
/ @aplusbi
⭐ Join this channel to get access to perks:→ bit.ly/3cBgfR1
My merch → teespring.com/...
Follow me → / sybermath
Subscribe → www.youtube.co...
⭐ Suggest → forms.gle/A5bG...
If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
in...
#algebra #polynomials #polynomialequations
via @RUclips @Apple @Desmos @NotabilityApp @googledocs @canva
PLAYLISTS 🎵 :
▶ Trigonometry: • Trigonometry
▶ Algebra: • Algebra
▶ Complex Numbers: • Complex Numbers
▶ Calculus: • Calculus
▶ Geometry: • Geometry
▶ Sequences And Series: • Sequences And Series
Since you do so many polynomial equations you perhaps should mention Descartes Rule of Signs, which in this case tells us that there are 0 or 2 positive roots and one negative root. Also the signs of the qutients are handy. Here you try 1 and get nonnegative coefficients for quotient and remainder, and so there are no roots greater than 1. Thus you do not have to try 2, 4, 8 or 16.
good idea
Great job!
I like your saying “ trial and error” because my first attempt was to split 17 as 1 and 16 which didn’t work. But I still am happy to find the other option of 9 and 8 worked perfectly.
A little calculus may be informative before solving (if a bit of overkill).
Let y = x^3 -x^2 +2x +16. Then y' = 3x^2 - 2x + 2 > 0 for all real x. Therefore y is a strictly-increasing cubic function and must have exactly one real zero. Now, since y = 16 at x = 0, the real zero of y must occur where x is negative. So, there's one negative zero and a pair of complex conjugates.
17 is also a perfect square minus a perfect cube.
Rational roots of the polynomial: ±1,±2,±4,±8,±16. x=-2 works...
1st method: easy to see -2 is a root
i dont think that's a valid method
@@BenDover69831 It is valid: P(-2)=-8-4-4+16=0 then (x+2) divides P(x). Use Horner method then use the classical solving methods of quadratic equations.
@@benjaminvatovez8823 i mean it works but it's not valid because it's guess and check
why not?
@@ShortsOfSyber cause it's just guessing (my opinion)