How Waterproof Casio G-Shock really is? Deep Sea Test

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 янв 2025

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @chrishince8947
    @chrishince8947 3 года назад +941

    What time is it when your 2km underwater?
    Time to get a new watch!

    • @Xeridanus
      @Xeridanus 3 года назад +53

      And lungs and blood vessels and well, anything made of soft tissue. Your bones might be fine. Might...

    • @Thedoug369
      @Thedoug369 3 года назад +11

      Time for an undertaker!

    • @bitkarek
      @bitkarek 3 года назад +6

      its time to die.

    • @mrnmrn1
      @mrnmrn1 3 года назад +17

      After going that deep, all you need to get is a coffin...

    • @Pentti_Hilkuri
      @Pentti_Hilkuri 3 года назад +9

      It's "I don't care anymore" time.

  • @John-ym9ht
    @John-ym9ht 3 года назад +580

    It's satisfying to find products that actually perform to and beyond their ratings. There seems to be so much false advertising out there. Well done G- Shock!

    • @jarekpszuk6944
      @jarekpszuk6944 3 года назад +53

      Casio watches are notoriously good in water resistance, even the 10 dollar Casio F91W is able to survive scuba diving trips with advertised 30 meter water resistance.

    • @AlexKall
      @AlexKall 3 года назад +12

      I remember a TV show or something that tested one long time ago, they even bbqed the watch, the plastic melted and the display cut out as long as it was on the BBQ, but as soon as it was removed it worked flawlessly. Impressive watches!
      Had one of those with 10 year battery and it did hold out for at least 8 years which is impressive as I used the backlight quite a lot.
      The only thing bad was the backlight button as it was just a thin bit of metal which broke of. I took it apart but didn't get the gasket on as it was supposed to go on so it wasn't water proof any more. Showered and had it under water, could see water droplets inside but still worked even with the water inside it.
      But it got condensation on the inside of the glass easily so a bought a new watch of the same watch again 👍

    • @macbook802
      @macbook802 3 года назад +3

      It’s still false advertising

    • @jarekpszuk6944
      @jarekpszuk6944 3 года назад +44

      @@macbook802 imagine the product being more durable than the manufacturer claims or customer expects and calling it false advertisement lol.

    • @macbook802
      @macbook802 3 года назад

      @@jarekpszuk6944 lawsuit

  • @superfast30
    @superfast30 3 года назад +306

    Even the most basic G-Shock models are overbuilt. Great test!

    • @PlasmaMongoose
      @PlasmaMongoose 3 года назад +20

      Makes sense as that feature is its main selling point.

    • @Sashimi404
      @Sashimi404 3 года назад +29

      7900 are not even iso rated. Imagine testing a frogman, a certified iso divers

    • @garbagetalkerbeast4311
      @garbagetalkerbeast4311 Год назад +2

      @@Sashimi404 I have a G7900 1 and DW9052.Both are great watch for daily

    • @betulaobscura
      @betulaobscura 8 месяцев назад +1

      Not "overbuilt" but properly built.

  • @StevanOutdoor
    @StevanOutdoor 3 года назад +91

    This is why I wear a Casio G-shock digital watch in my job as bushcraft, outdoor, survival instructor. Not just because the promised depth is no problem (I never go that deep) but also the shock proof. When I jump of a cliff and the watch hits the water it will withstand this sudden impact. Great testing on the watches.

  • @KriegerDelfin24
    @KriegerDelfin24 3 года назад +39

    I have the G-Shock and it has been trough alot. Really holds up to its name. Dont want to miss it any more

  • @bubbajenkins123
    @bubbajenkins123 3 года назад +762

    They found the G-spot. It was at the bottom of the ocean, bros. Take note.

    • @upsidedown4155
      @upsidedown4155 3 года назад +27

      It takes deep investigation, but like treasure, euphoric once found lol

    • @ACETONEWALL
      @ACETONEWALL 3 года назад +6

      Knowing where it is has made it even more out of reach

    • @RTB71289
      @RTB71289 3 года назад +10

      When you find it, you're gonna get wet.

    • @ironpirate8
      @ironpirate8 3 года назад +2

      It may as well be..

    • @dcale15
      @dcale15 3 года назад +6

      When it becomes an ocean is when you know you have found it

  • @StygianBlood
    @StygianBlood 3 года назад +224

    Probably the best advertisement these watches have or ever will get lol

    • @TheAverageTargaryen
      @TheAverageTargaryen 3 года назад +25

      Naw bro they’re big in the watch community everyone’s got a G shock for outdoor or everyday life even high rollers with Pateks, A Lange Söhne, Etc

    • @donniev8181
      @donniev8181 3 года назад

      Best or worst depending on the results.

    • @KarunaMurti
      @KarunaMurti 3 года назад +15

      Nah they already have better advertisements since the beginning (used as hockey game puck) and torture tests for more than 35 years already.

    • @donniev8181
      @donniev8181 3 года назад +3

      @@KarunaMurti yeah cause you always get hit by hockey pucks at 200 meters deep while swimming

    • @babalonkie
      @babalonkie 3 года назад +8

      @@donniev8181 They are the most reliable and robust affordable watches in existence and have been for decades... they are also more well known than Rolex... They earned their name decades ago and kept it.
      This test literately has ZERO practical use... as the watch can withstand more pressure than any human, even in a reinforced diving suit... So unless you drop the watch in the Mariana trench and plan to magically defy physics and get it... this video is just for fun (unless it breaks at human diver depths... which i don't need to see the video to know it will survive).
      They can survive hammer hits, being run over, repeatedly smashed on a brick wall... and this is just my personnel experience.

  • @MartinLuetzelberger
    @MartinLuetzelberger 3 года назад +80

    G-Shock fans have been waiting for this for a long time! 👍

  • @rause8622
    @rause8622 3 года назад +97

    I wear a g-shock everyday, this was really cool to watch I’m glad that it does what it says!

    • @hippycow1006
      @hippycow1006 3 года назад +4

      I wore mine to camp raven knob maybe 5 years ago. I swam with it, must’ve hit it on something because when I came out, it had water in it. It slowly started dying from there. Kinda sad

    • @entertainme7523
      @entertainme7523 3 года назад

      @@hippycow1006 what model

    • @hippycow1006
      @hippycow1006 3 года назад

      @@entertainme7523 I’m not sure, it was sitting in a drawer and I decided to use it. Probably 2001 or something like that

    • @hippycow1006
      @hippycow1006 3 года назад

      @@entertainme7523 nevermind, 1990’s and mine was destroyed in 2016

  • @joewas2225
    @joewas2225 6 месяцев назад +4

    As a G-Shock fan this puts a smile on my face. Hands down the best advertisement for one. Not only meets what they claim but far exceeds them.

  • @Henchman_Holding_Wrench
    @Henchman_Holding_Wrench 3 года назад +189

    Me washing that watch everyday after my shift ends: "Is this really safe?"

    • @entertainme7523
      @entertainme7523 3 года назад +8

      Soap will harm the seals

    • @tinton08568
      @tinton08568 3 года назад

      don't wash it with soap or chemicals

    • @jacobcurry922
      @jacobcurry922 3 года назад +1

      Wel shucks I give mine a good ole wash every now and then

    • @KennyVo120
      @KennyVo120 3 года назад +1

      Just warm water is fine, don't use detergents soaps etc

  • @derogre9602
    @derogre9602 3 года назад +297

    Please test the "Vostok Amphibia" Watches! Those are russian dive watches used by russian military, still produced in the same Factory in chistopol since the 60s! Those watches are known for their genius design, they are waterproof waaay over the rated depth of 200m. Also they are pretty cheap 70-80$ !

    • @juslitor
      @juslitor 3 года назад +21

      A good idea. The diver watch crowd would go nuts if you tested the most popular sub 500€ watches at the market.

    • @Beyondthepress
      @Beyondthepress  3 года назад +138

      We have those coming soon!

    • @derogre9602
      @derogre9602 3 года назад +16

      @@Beyondthepress Awesome! this deepsea-chamber is very cool and interesting content!

    • @BaddaBigBoom
      @BaddaBigBoom 3 года назад +2

      @@Beyondthepress "one month" Meranom? ;-)

    • @BaddaBigBoom
      @BaddaBigBoom 3 года назад +5

      I have two ...and a Kommandirski :-) Thumbs up.

  • @BarnOwl61
    @BarnOwl61 3 года назад +21

    I am very, very impressed with the quality of this relatively affordable diver. Happy to be the owner of a few models. I always expected it to perform a lot better than 20 bar, but this was incredible! I think my swimming in the pool won't be a problem! Compliments to Casio watches!

    • @parabyssg
      @parabyssg Год назад +2

      Before this video, I was sometimes afraid to swim with my CasioOak, but now absolutely not

    • @e28forever30
      @e28forever30 Год назад

      @@parabyssg
      Every G can stand up to serious abuse.

  • @AleksiJoensuu
    @AleksiJoensuu 3 года назад +40

    My guess is that if you would have gone back to surface from that 500-700 meters it would have come back to life. Because you know how if you push on an LCD with your finger it will go blank. So I think the glass pressed on the screen and made it go weird, but it might have been okay if you came back.

  • @ibanezleftyclub
    @ibanezleftyclub 3 года назад +75

    If you were a kid in the mid to late 80’s and the 90’s, you weren’t cool until you had one of these.

    • @LordTechPro
      @LordTechPro 3 года назад +13

      Even now

    • @elsamu95
      @elsamu95 3 года назад +14

      Even now, also if the g shocks were Swiss they would cost thousands of dollars.

    • @askylibrarianoftheoceans4102
      @askylibrarianoftheoceans4102 3 года назад

      I took an alternate route - I had a Mickey Mouse watch. I was cool because I could tell time on an analogue watch... which is really sad, tbh

    • @desertsoldier41
      @desertsoldier41 3 года назад

      @@elsamu95 Victorionox makes a Shock proof watch that costs $250 its called the INOX....so no. Marathon has a G-shock alternative for $100.

    • @voltgaming2213
      @voltgaming2213 3 года назад +4

      samu nah Japanese watches also cost high because of “made in Japan “ prestige but Casio keeps low by manufacturing out side btw Japan made g shock are better only slightly

  • @stevecollins2770
    @stevecollins2770 3 года назад +62

    SUGGESTION: Block the light coming from behind the watch and put several LEDs to shine on the watch face from outside the chamber.

  • @joeyr7294
    @joeyr7294 3 года назад +9

    0:45 the way he rubbed the cylinder, looks like it makes him really happy lol.

    • @Matt28NJ
      @Matt28NJ 3 года назад +1

      I noticed that too. Boys and their toys...

  • @JB-zp5fb
    @JB-zp5fb 3 года назад +749

    So a $100 Casio can go deeper than a $6000 Rolex Submariner, sounds like great value for money.

    • @adiwestborneo6652
      @adiwestborneo6652 3 года назад +30

      For money. Not style

    • @L1ama
      @L1ama 3 года назад +192

      @PCJPguy and it still keeps worse time than a $5 quartz oscillator by orders of magnitude lol

    • @PaoloUttinacci
      @PaoloUttinacci 3 года назад +4

      Rolex?? What is!!

    • @naio21
      @naio21 3 года назад +82

      @omar alrubaie this G-Shock also can, as it's solar powered. Of course the rechargeable battery won't last forever (+/- 15 years), but nor will a Rolex without servicing periodically.

    • @JohnDoe-sp5jd
      @JohnDoe-sp5jd 3 года назад +128

      @PCJPguy FYI Rolex watches are not hand assembled, and it certainly doesn’t take a year to make one. Rolex have made 1.2 million watches in 2019. All Rolex watches are robotically assembled beside the ones that have embedded diamonds.

  • @jrc9568
    @jrc9568 3 года назад +4

    this is a 200meter Casio watch...is very resistant...amazing test....greetings from Colombia.

  • @evilarchconservative2952
    @evilarchconservative2952 Год назад +3

    Love ❤ my G-Shocks....this proves they are tougher than advertised.

  • @iftimevasile4648
    @iftimevasile4648 3 года назад +40

    Awesome videos! It would be interesting to test some affordable watches (like Casio, Timex or Seiko), rated at 30 and 50 meters to see how they perform under greater water pressure.

    • @skipinkoreaable
      @skipinkoreaable Год назад +1

      Yes. Over at the Greg Anderson channel he says that he always swims with any Casio that says 50m or more and never had an issue in 30 years. It would be interesting to see.

    • @Dorgpoop
      @Dorgpoop Месяц назад +1

      ​@@skipinkoreaable
      I've worn a Casio f91w for years, which is only officially rated as water resistant enough for showers and not swimming, but I've swam with it in the sea for years with no issues. When Casio says that a watch is only water resistant, they actually test it to a depth of 30 m, which is deeper than any non professional diver could ever swim. They massively understate the performance of their watches because in Japan the laws are very strict on false advertising so they play it safe.

  • @paulelliott3220
    @paulelliott3220 3 года назад +26

    The deep sea chamber is a wonderful item to have
    Think how many thing you can slowly crush - he’s having a go and this is great
    Did it get the metal version of the bends from the sharp decrease in pressure ?
    It’s a wonderful channel

  • @thehorologychannel
    @thehorologychannel 3 года назад +3

    Very impressive for the watch, that even is not a dive watch. Thank you very much for the video!

  • @RealBelisariusCawl
    @RealBelisariusCawl Год назад +2

    I used to sell watches for a living. G-Shocks may not be the prettiest watches out there but they are without a doubt the absolute best buy for the money. Crazy durable, crazy long-lasting, absolutely worth it if you actually need a watch that will never fail you, no questions asked.
    I’d take it into combat if I had to.
    We sold watches five times that price that were way nicer looking that I wouldn’t trust to do one tenth as much as one of these little babies.

  • @WoodworkerDon
    @WoodworkerDon 3 года назад +15

    The outcome does not SHOCK me at all. :)

  • @papricep6248
    @papricep6248 2 года назад +2

    I love that in ever way G Shocks are tougher than advertised and much tougher than I would ever need.

  • @YouTube_user3333
    @YouTube_user3333 3 года назад +3

    I got given a G shock watch recently. I was a little concerned how much it would cost to fit a new band. After watching this, it’s totally worth putting a new band on, for my free diving. 👏 thank you

  • @BryanTorok
    @BryanTorok 3 года назад +3

    Thank you for doing these tests. It is really nice to know that my watch will survive to any depth that I am likely to take it. For me that might be 10 feet.

  • @rolex517
    @rolex517 3 года назад +42

    You would try an Oil filled watch, something like a Sinn Hydro, they are rated to 11,000 feet.

    • @khalidnajjar
      @khalidnajjar 3 года назад +14

      or a casio duro and do an oil fill mod the rating on that is still un known

    • @smallthings6590
      @smallthings6590 3 года назад +7

      I'd like to see a oil filled gshock to see how much better it gets.

    • @AlfredoCronistaViajes
      @AlfredoCronistaViajes 3 года назад +3

      I agree. In some other video even someone offered to send her a hydrolyzed watch for testing. A cheap CASIO could be enough. A MRW-200H o something like that.

    • @thelairdmc
      @thelairdmc 3 года назад +3

      Haha, I just posted requesting oil filled!
      Great minds think alike!

    • @richardking6985
      @richardking6985 3 года назад +4

      I was just about to suggest fiilling the gshock with mineral oil ....

  • @gshockhighfashion
    @gshockhighfashion 3 года назад +10

    G-Shock, real toughness.

  • @InNominePraxis
    @InNominePraxis 3 года назад +74

    I was screaming "PRESS THE BUTTONS" after you took it out. Does it still make the beeping sounds, is the EL backlight still working?

    • @AndrewZonenberg
      @AndrewZonenberg 3 года назад +24

      I also wanted to see them open it up and see if the electronics were soaked or if the inside stayed dry.

    • @appalachiangunman9589
      @appalachiangunman9589 3 года назад +2

      @@AndrewZonenberg same here. I’d like to know at what point it would actually leak.

    • @snowywelsh
      @snowywelsh 7 месяцев назад

      Me too

  • @BushCampingTools
    @BushCampingTools 3 года назад +2

    Still watertight to 300m but the LCD is now deforming from the pressure of the glass at 31.5 bar as one can see the letters SAT starting to disappear. Amazing!

  • @timmcdonald5335
    @timmcdonald5335 3 года назад +11

    It would be great if you can do more of these tests with dive watches.

  • @edgolembe956
    @edgolembe956 4 месяца назад +2

    An impressive test. With the current interest in oil filled "Hyro Modding" watches, it be interesting to see how that would work.

  • @igbowgames
    @igbowgames 3 года назад +12

    "There is one guy in the world that might break this watch" Casio G-Shock new slogan

  • @98167
    @98167 4 месяца назад +1

    thank you. I enjoyed your demonstration & humor 😅

  • @certomaz
    @certomaz 3 года назад +9

    I aways knew cheap plastic g-shock is better than metal divers, now thanks to your tests it is proved. Thank you!

  • @spacepie9
    @spacepie9 3 года назад +20

    I'd love to see an underwater camera test where the camera is recording from inside the chamber. Maybe a cheap one from amazon, then move up to a gopro with or without a waterproof housing.

    • @ewcm1878
      @ewcm1878 3 года назад

      Go pro sucks.

  • @Wingnut_Stickman
    @Wingnut_Stickman 3 года назад +3

    It is nice to see a product that lives up to its claim. BTP Rocks!

  • @commanderlake7997
    @commanderlake7997 3 года назад +33

    Notice all the buttons pop out when the screen breaks at full pressure.

    • @Eckoolt
      @Eckoolt 3 года назад +9

      They were pushed in because of pressure at first, that means watch didn't let in any water.

    • @iridiumballs1645
      @iridiumballs1645 7 месяцев назад

      06:11

  • @LordTechPro
    @LordTechPro 3 года назад +45

    G-SHOCK. Absolute Toughness.

  • @Celestier
    @Celestier 2 года назад +2

    Wow Even though it's a basic model of the G-Shock, it's amazing how it works flawlessly up to 500 meters!!

  • @unclebob540i3
    @unclebob540i3 3 года назад +4

    G shocks are tough! I used one as my primary dive watch for years.

  • @sevensixtwothirtynine3020
    @sevensixtwothirtynine3020 Год назад +1

    quite possibly THE BEST watch review ever

  • @maboleth
    @maboleth 3 года назад +3

    Great test! The best I've found on the internet so far. Suggestion to maybe try compressing and decompressing in smaller steps next time? Maybe it wouldn't break that easily even at 2km? When you relieved the pressure it literally exploded inside. Again, fantastic test! I love Casio even more now. :)

  • @dorusalman4000
    @dorusalman4000 3 года назад

    Nice work to test Casio watches..i am a fan Casio G Shock !! YOU ARE THE BEST !!

  • @JamesEsau
    @JamesEsau 3 года назад +46

    It seemed to really not like the speed at which you increased pressure. I'd be curious to see if it would hold up to greater pressure if you went slower (more like real scenario since you can't dive that fast)

    • @USS_ESSEX_CV-9
      @USS_ESSEX_CV-9 3 года назад +1

      I would imagine if he went slow it probably would have broken closer to a kilometer in depth. That is completely a guess on my part I have no evidence whatsoever to back that up

  • @northshoreman
    @northshoreman 3 года назад +2

    That is unbelievable.

  • @consciouslasagne354
    @consciouslasagne354 3 года назад +3

    My friend gave me my G-shock. What a nice friend.

  • @zsavage1820
    @zsavage1820 2 года назад +1

    If I"m not mistaken... that screen is liquid crystal ... I am still shocked G... that the Casio lived up to it's hype... thanks again for another great video...

  • @rjgscotland
    @rjgscotland 3 года назад +7

    Lighting was better in the last watch video. I think you need to bump up the exposure compensation (EV Comp) setting on the GoPro a bit to counteract the backlight.

    • @fewwiggle
      @fewwiggle 3 года назад +1

      Or, maybe (for digital watches) he needs a small reflector/mirror off to the side to throw some more front light on the watch face.

    • @AlexKall
      @AlexKall 3 года назад +1

      @@fewwiggle good idea!

  • @stephenbridges2791
    @stephenbridges2791 3 года назад +1

    I have the negative display version of that very watch. Nice to see it do so well.

    • @snowywelsh
      @snowywelsh 7 месяцев назад

      I have that one too.

  • @johnl.8616
    @johnl.8616 3 года назад +14

    Casio G shocks, they take a beating.

  • @donniev8181
    @donniev8181 3 года назад +2

    These companies are definitely watching these tests with their fingers crossed. God bless

  • @scottsj4625
    @scottsj4625 3 года назад +3

    That is impressive that it was still fine past 600 meters for a 200 meter rated Gshock, I have a few of them, I really like them and they can really take abuse.

  • @recht181
    @recht181 3 года назад +2

    not finished with the vid yet, but this will make or break my decision to buy one. thank you!

  • @jaceshards
    @jaceshards 3 года назад +22

    "You can still see the time but some of the seasonings are gone." Lauri, you should be ashamed for such a dreadful pun, lmao.

  • @PaoloUttinacci
    @PaoloUttinacci 3 года назад +4

    CGS, simply the best watches on earth.

  • @bensneller5797
    @bensneller5797 3 года назад +26

    What happened to the giant blender project u were planning to build a few years ago?

    • @Beyondthepress
      @Beyondthepress  3 года назад +17

      I have been way too busy :D I try to get my shit together and finish it on someday

  • @joshedward420
    @joshedward420 3 года назад

    Just found this chanel, and I Love this Chanel!

  • @awmperry
    @awmperry 3 года назад +3

    That’s bloody impressive.

  • @winmachielse1233
    @winmachielse1233 8 месяцев назад +1

    Impressive test. I have g-shocks since the 80’s, they’re very tough indeed.

    • @itsallrobbish
      @itsallrobbish Месяц назад

      Good for you. I have my DW-5200 from 1984 that I bought new and I have a DW-5600C from 1987, brilliant watches!

  • @heramoti123
    @heramoti123 3 года назад +11

    NEXT TIME TEST THE G-SHOCK FROGMAN SERIES

  • @jazzman5598
    @jazzman5598 Год назад

    I love your watch vids. Thank you both!

  • @aliffitisham129
    @aliffitisham129 3 года назад +5

    Let us hope that this channel will grow big one day and have the chance to test the sea dweller 🙏

  • @ma7978
    @ma7978 3 года назад

    Have this watch for years! Best watch EVER MADE!!

  • @gyulahajdu2798
    @gyulahajdu2798 3 года назад +3

    Finally a real stress test :D

  • @chrisk1255
    @chrisk1255 3 года назад +1

    4:07 You can see the cracks appear in the crystal. Fantastic!
    These watches are still invincible, in my opinion.

  • @Macieyevsky
    @Macieyevsky 3 года назад +4

    I think that 3D printed stuff with different infill percentage might behave funny in this chamber. It would be a pretty good video theme.

  • @SidBonkers51
    @SidBonkers51 2 года назад +1

    Brilliant, cant say I'm surprised though, Casio know how to make a proper tough watch.

  • @aaroncerverau
    @aaroncerverau 3 года назад +15

    Please please, try a G shock Frogman to see how a "true diver's G shock watch" performs .
    Please please

    • @GadgetInspektor
      @GadgetInspektor 3 года назад

      but they rated it 20ATM/200m too. So if it would be so much more capable why wouldn’t Casio rate it 300 or 500m?

    • @aaroncerverau
      @aaroncerverau 3 года назад

      @@GadgetInspektor normally when they rate watched, they need to leave a margin, so it could be safely rated at X meters of depth resistance. For example, watch is rated 20bar, but testing might be at 25bar, so there is always a little bit more protection.

    • @filippxx
      @filippxx 3 года назад

      @@GadgetInspektor I Think it's related to paying for new certifications and paperwork. It's really not worth the trouble of doing that in a few hundred dollars watch as everyone already know they can take at least double from independent tests.

  • @DovidSal
    @DovidSal 3 года назад

    i have no idea of what they are saying but i really like the show for the technical part and because of the way they do the show , very simple, spontaneously .. just regular people doing a good test.. regards..

  • @derGotti1988
    @derGotti1988 3 года назад +14

    You could test a "Sinn UX" rated up to 5 km depth with the watch still working. The case actually can hold the pressure of up to 12 km depth. A really impressive dive watch :)

    • @azianknight
      @azianknight 2 года назад +4

      Who's gonna dive at 12KM wearing a watch? The deepest dive a human being has gone is 332 metres. Lol

    • @Jorj57
      @Jorj57 2 года назад +2

      @@azianknight a submarine 😂

  • @jaumeballesteros4238
    @jaumeballesteros4238 3 года назад +1

    Buenísimos vídeos..por favor, mete un casio f91..
    Saludos

  • @BennyTygohome
    @BennyTygohome 3 года назад +6

    The screen would go dark and anni would say "stop" but when the man would look it would appear better again.

  • @ciaociao5993
    @ciaociao5993 3 года назад +1

    There are many legendary watches you could test:
    1) Citizen ny0040
    2) Seiko SKX007/SKX013/SKX009
    3) Vostok Amphibian
    4) Cressi Manta
    5) Citizen Aqualand 1 JP2000
    6) Casio Frogman GWF-D1000
    7) Invicta Pro Diver 8926OB
    8) Hamilton Khaki Navy Frogman
    9) Citizen jp1010
    10) Every Rolex
    11) Omega Seamaster Diver 300
    12) Hamilton KHAKI NAVY SCUBA
    13) Swatch Scuba
    14) Seiko Turtle / mini Turtle
    15) Longines Hydroconquest
    16) Seiko Sea Urchin SNZF17
    17) Casio New Frogman GWF-A1000
    18) Sector DIve 300

  • @1SaG
    @1SaG 3 года назад +22

    If I ever dove to 700 meters, I wouldn't be worried about my watch. I'd be dead from the water pressure long before the watch would give up the ghost ... :D

    • @Pete...NoNotThatOne
      @Pete...NoNotThatOne 3 года назад +6

      If I ever get to seven hundred metres, my feet will be encased in a block of concrete, and I won’t give a shit what time it is

    • @e28forever30
      @e28forever30 3 года назад

      Slechte vertaling hoor...😬

    • @Jack_Krauzers
      @Jack_Krauzers 3 года назад +1

      dude I wont even go pass 100m 🤣 that's scary beneath the pitch black where water consumes you

  • @BishanMash
    @BishanMash 4 месяца назад +1

    Can you do a video on an anadigi gshock?

  • @Arctos3gs
    @Arctos3gs 3 года назад +6

    "So you can go swim with this and wash your hands." :'D

  • @KurzawaJakub
    @KurzawaJakub 3 года назад

    Thank you for testing the G-Shock watch!

  • @phillipdavies1081
    @phillipdavies1081 3 года назад +5

    Always been a big fan of Casio G-Shocks, owned a few of them over the years. Knew they were good but even I didn't realise they were this good.

  • @MusicFurler
    @MusicFurler 3 года назад +5

    Would salt water be different in anyway? Just curious.

    • @kanada2525
      @kanada2525 3 года назад

      Yes it would.
      Divers usually put their watches in a glass of clean water overnight after a saltwater dive to desolve the salt buily up by buttons and such, is what I was told after diving on holiday by the instructor.
      It was a casio g shock mtg 930du.
      It is pushing 9 years and I never take it off!
      2 years ago id did get but foggy after a hot summer day I was after exercise, I had a swim in the local stream wixh was pretty cold. That must of done it.
      Next year I am planning to buy the " new" all metal g shock.

    • @CakeDispenser
      @CakeDispenser 3 года назад

      @@kanada2525 I hope in the future they release a Gshock square that is solar powered and keeps track of time with GPS.

    • @Sashimi404
      @Sashimi404 3 года назад

      ρ g h. Desity times by gravity and depth. Salt and tap water have different densities. If youre diving irl, it would make a different. A dive at 200m will results different pressure reading between a salt water vs tap water.

  • @sc1837
    @sc1837 2 года назад

    Great thanks...Would like to see a Casio Duro tested or a ratio freediver. Thanks

  • @KENKENNIFF
    @KENKENNIFF 3 года назад +3

    I got one of these because its like the one Walter wears in The Big Lebowski. He knows about pressure.

  • @Jimmy2Deadly
    @Jimmy2Deadly 3 года назад

    Love these classic watches

  • @brotherandrew3393
    @brotherandrew3393 2 года назад +4

    The problem is that your pressure chamber does not tell us when the watch is no longer sealed so that water can come in. The watch can still work if it is unsealed under pressure as long as it is not flooded with water.

  • @maddon001
    @maddon001 3 года назад

    my friends g shock had a hard life, to give it a good send off we placed it under a bmw wheel and did a huge burn out on top of it. amazingly the inner workings survived and still showed the time.

  • @WoodworkerDon
    @WoodworkerDon 3 года назад +19

    I'm never first.
    I'm never last.
    But I'm always watching,
    And having a blast.

  • @villagranvicent
    @villagranvicent Год назад +1

    It would be interesting to discover the 10-times more expensive Frogman also dies at 600m

  • @doctwiggenberry5324
    @doctwiggenberry5324 3 года назад +3

    I bet even Jaques Costeau would have loved to have that watch.

  • @phongnguyen007
    @phongnguyen007 3 года назад +1

    Crazy even 50 bar is far beyond expectation

  • @albedo0point39
    @albedo0point39 3 года назад +33

    Send it back to Casio and see if they'll replace! :P

    • @assassinlexx1993
      @assassinlexx1993 3 года назад +17

      Say you have a deep bathtub.

    • @aswinipaikray809
      @aswinipaikray809 3 года назад +1

      @@assassinlexx1993 😂😂😂

    • @adsads4307
      @adsads4307 3 года назад +1

      @@assassinlexx1993 yeah, like 2km deep bathtub

    • @snowywelsh
      @snowywelsh 7 месяцев назад

      I took mine to the bottom of voyager deep and it still survived!

  • @FiveJiggawatts
    @FiveJiggawatts 3 года назад +1

    Could you test a rolex submariner

  • @lafaina79
    @lafaina79 3 года назад +4

    When a Casio oil filled?

    • @MonMon-vy8cb
      @MonMon-vy8cb 3 года назад +1

      Someone already did that to Casio Duro, you can find here at youtube.

    • @lafaina79
      @lafaina79 3 года назад

      @@MonMon-vy8cb a deep pressure test? I'm curious....

  • @bode3186
    @bode3186 3 года назад

    thanks for your hard efforts

  • @김태원-d3u
    @김태원-d3u 3 года назад +4

    For someone who is disappointed with the G shock result.
    Plz, no worries.
    The watch is gonna survive even though the owner is likely dead by the water pressure..
    If you are not a "super" professional diver or sth,
    The watch is gonna be totally fine

  • @snowfugitive3318
    @snowfugitive3318 3 года назад +2

    Let's be honest if you are 1km under water I don't think your gonna be worried about your 40$ watch 😂 Your gonna be dead

  • @TheAstronomyDude
    @TheAstronomyDude 3 года назад +10

    Push the G!!! You should have tried to see if the backlight still turns on.

    • @Beyondthepress
      @Beyondthepress  3 года назад +5

      I didn't know that there is such a feature :D

  • @kevinbeckett2181
    @kevinbeckett2181 3 года назад +2

    Would love to see a gshock frogman in there, they are said to go to 1000m no problem! Rated iso200m. Bit expensive though!

  • @kolo95pl
    @kolo95pl 3 года назад +5

    Please test two same watches one hydromod and one normal. Im very curious about result. 😀