+Joseph Ang Correct. But once I knew a guy who didn't believe in me when I said that humans are animals. He even went to the biology teacher and asked her this question in hope to prove me wrong. He was 8 years old though, so was I. :) Imagine his disappointment when he learned the obvious. I wouldn't imagine a grown man saying the same thing though.
@Sara Cole I guess this guy had some seriously funny reactions. Parrots love that but yeah, more often than not, people end up accidentally reinforcing bad behaviours like screaming and biting.
+Stephaney Gangadin wild Orcas do. different orcas from different oceans have been known to make sounds differently, however an Orca "tribe" or family has its own language, and also have different "accents"
Hello chicken owner here, they have their own unique language where certain noises mean different things and they have a wide variety of them. My one girl does velociraptor noises(not sure what that one means yet) I have never heard any other chickens make a sound exactly like it, she often commonly purrs and has different forms of chatters or complaints. The calls for alarm sound alike but are slightly different; for instance if its a false alarm and she wants attention, just laid a egg, saw a aerial predator, or a terrestrial predator! When a chicken hears a egg song all the others will yell with that one chicken too in what I like to call a "Sympathy pain call" even roosters will do it. I believe its more to let them know they are there but its something that i still find interesting
The radio show I heard about Prairie Dogs mentioned that, in tests, they could invent new words to describe something they had never seen before. That is rarely seen in animals. They lack displacement, but their current location and the current time are the most important things to them.
My cat definitely talks some serious shit when he gets hungry or agitated!! The human standard is Not the Only way to measure things!! Even with our language, only around 7% of what we say is actually conveyed in the words we use. The majority of our communications are in things like tone and non-verbal clues... Even though my cat just meows and things like that, I can genuinely understand several different things he "says" based on context clues, tone, body language etc!! I can usually tell what he is communicating!! And he 100% definitely uses more verbal sounds (meows etc) than he would in Nature because he totally does understand that WE communicate verbally and he understands that's how he needs to try to communicate with me!! He does the best he can with the limitations he has but he understands how to convey what he wants from me!! They are so smart it's crazy....
Nah, it's not true that only 7% of what we say is conveyed in the words we use. For example, everything you just said conveyed a lot of information, and it was all conveyed in words. I can growl, bark or scream, but I won't be able to convey the information that I would convey by uttering the phrase 'I want to invest on real estate in China in 2019'. Well, you cat can't say what I just said. That's because, regardless of how awesomely smart cats can be, they lack language.
Your cat may actually have developed a specific laguage for you alone. I notice cats use different signals for the same thing to different people in the same family. It's also mentioned at the end of this article: www.thecut.com/2015/04/your-cat-is-trying-to-talk-to-you.html
They would watch us more and imitate our actions (such as a raccoon watching you take something apart/put it together and try to copy it and learn how it works
Maybe smell and vision. Basically I see and at fall of a bridge then a week later I can show you what I saw.(with out using a computer) or what it smelt like
+Julliete Blackwood (The Blue Mermaid) Why just colour? The words could alter the senses of whomever your speaking to, to the point that their mind believes that their body is physically in the situation you are describing. I wonder what learning a subject like calculus would be like if language was that powerful?
It seems to me that we've created such strict stipulations for language so that no other creatures communications will fill all points and we remain unique. It seems to me language among non human animals would be any type of symbolic communication. If that's our definition then it seems language occurs in any animal that exists in a community. The more intelligent the animal the more complex the language
Monogrammar seems the most logical option. The simplest possible language is a monogrammar ☝ language 📜. The grammar rule ➊ of a sentence existing is all the grammar needed. 😆 Directly translating a monogrammar ☝ language 📜 into the non-monogrammar ❌☝ languages 📜📜📜 humans 👥👥👥👥 have results in gibberish 😵💫. Thus, in order to translate a monogrammar ☝ language 📜, you need to know a monogrammar ☝ language 📜. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anyway, the point is, it is useful for AI 🤖, as it is modular, and easy to start learning. It can also be used as a reference for understanding common human languages. 😆
I lived with a variety of animals in my life. I have no doubt: all of them communicate and some of them have language. We just don't understand. If you pay attention to tour cat or dog, you will notice the variations on the sounds, like phonemes. The reasons behind the "limited communication" of many observed animals is likely due to natural conditions (very hash). If I put YOU in a jungle situation from chieldhood let's see how your vocabulary would be...
II-V-I hello! I understand your point, since I also had the opportunity to study human development and language at college. But have you ever observed how domestic animals start to use phonemes and specific gestures to communicate?
@@Sage2000 Yes, of course. But (I beg your pardon) I don't understand why you bring this up. Many domestic animals have a decent ability to communicate with humans but a) still no language because it doesn't have all traits (if we follow the definition in the video which I assume) and b) wild animals do have quite an elaborate system too. Which of course depends on the species. Highly social animals however like Orcas, Lions, Apes... communicate on a broad spectrum in the wild because their "lifestyle" (here I lack proper English vocabulary) requires to do so. If you put a group of human children into a jungle they will most likely communicate a lot to survive. Even though their communication will be centered around different topics. How culture, creativity etc. would be, however, that's a topic for another comment :)
As you mentioned after all we are all animals. And this is why I am convinced that every animal can communicate with the same type of animal. As humans have their language in the same way dogs and elephants have their own "language" no matter if it is sign language, some voices, or even a dance.
Thanks TED ED . Apart from the great knowledge . Can we please appreciate how great funny the animation is . Not only in this episode but also in all others .
Crows actually have different dialects for different regions. Calls from different states and even group's can differ. I crow call for fun, and if I am ever going to a new location I listen to recordings of group's from those areas and change my calls accordingly. It's very facinating. As they are extremely intelligent. I even feed my local crows and they come to a specific clicking noise I make, letting them know it's time to eat.. it's been years and I don't feed them regularly and they have taught their children my "feeding call" so they know where to get a free meal if they hear it, it's quite amazing they have passed it down and remembered it even though it isn't a constant feeding source.
Tom H Well, /k/, /æ/, and /t/ don't have any meaning on their own, but you can put them together to make the word 'cat' which does have a meaning. With animals, most sounds and units of body language have their own meaning, and you can't put them together to make more complex meanings. A dog's growl usually expresses anger or superiority, and a whimper usually expresses fear, inferiority, or a want. So each sound has it's own meaning, and you can't put them together.
I am a linguistics student and every class talks about 7 different features (around that much I think). I'm kinda mad because the video oversimplified the features and now everyone here is acting like they came up with a groundbreaking idea when there are many other details to take into account. Of course animals have features of language in many cases, but the fact that they don't have all of them means that they have a COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, which is nothing like language. People really need to get educated before making outlandish claims.
I'm not an animal dude, this video just show me that we are so different, we were created with another special way to live. that's why we have the capacity to think in our purpose of live.
Biologically, you are an animal, no denying it. We were not "created" in the intelligent sense, although we are extraordinary compared to the rest of the animal kingdom.
yea, crows too, and there was a parrot that used comunication with words like a 4 year old kid (search it, was a famous trained one) but if they added all of them would be so much
동물들이 언어를 갖고 있는지 알아보고 무었을 언어라고 정의하는지 배웠습니다. 또 언어와 관련된 4가지 특징 분리성, 문법, 생산성, 전위성에 대하여 배워서 무슨 동물들은 언어를 가지고 있다는 것을 알아냈습니다. 하지만 우리언어가 가장 좋은 것같습니다. 좋은 영상감사합니다.
christy price Because humans separated themselves from animals (I think because we are more advanced and stuff). But we are still animals, just a different species.
The premise of this video is not correct. The narrative tells us that by human standards no other animal has a language. The problem is that we are superimposing our system of language on to another creature. this is the same as studying a tribe in the Rain Forest and deciding that they are not civilized because they do not have electricity. It may not be a great example, but hopefully you get the idea. when we meet a race of spacefaring creatures, they may think that we have no language, because we do not communicate in the same manner as they. How can we determine if other animals have a language without completely knowing their means of communication? It is like going to country that speaks another language and unless you are fluent in that country's language and trying to form a sentence that makes all grammatical sense to that person. Most of us can not do that. We need to memorize certain words and phrases and bring along our little cross language dictionary. Three examples of creatures that we know a lot about but can not communicate to them in their style, are the other primates, canines and felines. We can say the same thing with the cetaceans. We are like children learning our parents way of communicating and still making silly sounds and every once in a while making a noise or gesture that makes sense to our parents.
+Lorie Franceschi Language and communication aren't the same thing. Language exhibits specific properties mentioned in the video, while a communication system is something more arbitrary.
+Lorie Franceschi The point of the video was "Do any animals have language comparable to humans?" And the answer was no. The question was distinctly about human style language, not generic communication methods (which would be a different and longer topic).
+Peter Thomas they are trying to put a human language value on other animals. You can not do that and expect to get any answer close to what we think of as language. again my question is, can any of us speak in any other animal's language? No we can not. We can teach other primates and cetaceans who to do basic communication skills, but they are learning our language not us learning theirs. Do not put our way of thinking on any subject on to any animal besides our own species. Science is just not done in that method. if you speak another human language, you know that the way its grammar is put together it totally different than English. So how can we, as humans, know if another animal has a language that has grammar and syntax when the hundreds of human languages do not even match each other in the way they are put together. In English we put the adjectives in front of the noun. In the Romance languages, the noun goes in front of the adjective. How do we know if the other animals do not have a different style of putting their adjectives with their nouns? We can not know because we do not speak their language. Quit trying to put a human face on animal language it will not work and you will be laughed off the stage if you tried to put this in front of an audience of animal scientists.
Most animals do not have anything close to language, even if they have the ability to communicate. Just rematch the video, language is different to communication. Yes, there's a lot of research on a lot of things to do with animal language, some could be quite complex, others have bits and pieces but aren't anywhere close. Even IF we find any animals with language, almost ALL of them don't have it. Also, we understand human language quite fucking well, the entire study of linguistics is based on it. The last two thirds of your last response is assuming we don't know anything about human languages, or at the very least that we haven't extrapolated from it. Seriously, give science more credit than that.
Yes. Humans are animals. It’s just animals have a different way of doing it. I can’t believe we really think because they don’t talk like us they can’t communicate with others
In other words: "We can't really understand anything other than what we can conceptualize, so we assume they must not be doing so"... I can understand the "continuum" because if the Universe is telling us anything, its that everything grows and develops, but knowing this same factor and that these creatures have been existed side by side for our entire understanding... Why are you even asking this question? You, clearly, wouldn't be able to understand it anyway.
"so we assume they must not be doing so" Yes, but that's not the end. After the assumption, we come up with ways to test if they're doing so or not. They fail all the test. We conclude. That's how science works.
I don't know if that's the case or not. it would depend on if communication or language or whatever you call it is linked to intelligence. Is it that animals don't have a language or is it that they just communicate different? It is possible if language is linked to intelligence that maybe they have more limited capacity for language. But while you may be able to look at all humans in the world and find similarities in all our languages we are all human. We all can speak like humans, we all have mostly the same physical abilities to speak, can make the same sounds as each other mostly, there may be exceptions with physical disabilities and mutations, but humans all have the same abilities to talk in general. Not all animals do. And physical abilities like being mute or deaf can effect human communication so it proves there is more than just intelligence that can effect it. Using a combination of sounds pausing is what we call a word. Making another combination of sounds and pausing is called another word. If we keep making sounds, pause, sounds, pause, combinations of sounds, pause, that's called a sentence. I don't know if this is what qualifies as a language. Maybe this is what qualifies as a, "human" language. Even if we had the same intelligence but were different creatures, would our language be the same if our physical abilities to both give out information, and receive information because our senses are different be the same? There probably are many ways of intelligently communicating without using a combination of something, spacing it out, and another combination of something to form words, and then using those words in a certain order to speak. Like you could use a specific sound and always have that sound mean the same thing no matter how the sound was made or how many times it was made, and have another sound mean something else, like how you can have sounds on a smart phone, one can mean there is a notification, one can mean a text has been sent, and the other can mean someone is calling you on the phone. And you can communicate that way without sounds. Like if primates use their gestures together to add things to what they are saying, or say things in more detail this could just be a more human-like way of communicating even if it doesn't use sounds. I think there are lots of ways of communicating that you could communicate besides how humans do. Is it related to intelligence? Maybe, but does a language being complex mean it has to be exactly like a human's? Humans not only use sounds to communicate, we combine things in a certain order to communicate. The order may actually just be the way humans communicate. But we have body language which works totally different from our verbal language. If body language is so much about intelligence then why do humans have body language? I think body language is very different from how we think of language or communication. Body language is automatic. We usually think of communication as something we deliberately do to give information to each other. if that qualifies as a language and body language does not then you could say that animals do not all have a language because I think some animals only learn to read each other but do not actually learn to speak. Is this a matter of intelligence? Maybe. But it is just a different way of communicating. I think humans communicate purposefully. It could be our brain, it may also be because I think being able to communicate purposefully allows humans to control when we give out information or not. In fact I think humans use this to deceive each other mostly which is why humans like communicating deliberately rather than just reading each other sometimes. People will actually control their body language and facial expressions possibly subconsciously to hide information and even fake facial expressions and body language to basically lie and deceive people without words, and purposeful communication is easier to lie with so I think humans will often conceal their automatic communication so no one actually knows what people are fully thinking, their motives, feeling, etc... If people just let their bodies automatically do the talking then humans may be able to actually read each other better, because body language always means the same thing unlike how we could take the word apple and decide it means a chair instead of a apple, body language always means the same thing, it is not changeable, it doesn't lie. So intentional communication is much better if you want to conceal things about yourself or deceive. So yeah I think humans don't use automatic communication for that reason. Same goes for tone of voice and some evidence has shown our bodies actually produce smells like animals we could use to communicate but don't, we get rid of them. The smell communication some animals use also automatically I believe changes depending on the mood and other features of a animal. I think that intentional communication is done in birds, it could be intelligence, but the thing is that I think it may also be they cannot smell well usually, or at all sometimes, and smell is not so good for communicating in the air it seems because a lot of smells seem to not travel through the air well, plus I think too much automatic communication with body language could interfere with a bird's ability to fly. Where as I think humans do not want everything about them to be known. It is possible to could be intelligence too. Humans could probably use intentional communication in a lot of other ways than just with a combination of sounds, or letters. It is possible some animals have more advanced ways of gaining information than we know, but it is so different from how humans communicate it is harder to understand or read. But I could be wrong, I am not saying I could not be. But it's just a idea.
I've heard animals have different accents and some species communicate differently in different places on earth. I'm not sure but I think it's not really universal
What if some animal language are missing some of those 4 properties, but instead have some kind of 5'th property that we (humans) lack or havn't even thought that a language can have?
Language is to communicate, nothing else other than that. Animals also communicate through their language as humans do; however, I think the importance is humans can share various matters with details compared to animals.
Do all of one species of Animal communicate the same way, or do they have "Languages" within the species? Are there differences in the ways an Elephant from the North of Africa communicate, to one from the South? (For example) If so, is this akin to a different Language? Or is it more of a Dialect or Accent? If animals struggle to understand each other, do they try other forms of communication, like humans would use gestures or expressions if they dont know the language?
Not necessarily language but I once saw a vid where a penguin that was COMPLETELY WILD walked up to a guy with a camera, stopped, put it's head down, and made this weird noise before checking him out and leaving, best greeting manners I've seen in this modern world tbh.
Not really. "Language" is something only found to be had by humans. We, humans, have different intellectual abilities from other animals. That's why we're the only ones that display the cognitive ability of language. Now, if you want to say "language" means something else, do it, but it will be your own personal technical term, not the actual meaning of the scientific term "language" as effectively used in science.
Manuel Luján exactly dude. Many species exhibit parts of human language, but not fully-loaded with the advanced components that makeup a true language ability. Our language capability is open-ended, displaced, productive, and recursive. Overall, humans are cognitively the most advanced species on earth. That’s due to both enhanced, and unique abilities. We’re so advanced, that we debate over our dominant status. We study ourselves, and comprise scientific -ologies. We even form abstract concepts about making contact, with aliens, we consider smarter than ourselves. I have a dog. Various animal species do have complex intelligences. Apart from humans, the animal kingdom is spectacular all within itself.
Damn. After watching this I have feeling. How we became like how we are. Where we focus life without smartphone is going to be okay or not, we forget all these buildings,religions,language,meals etc we created on Earth 😊
so is a whistle language ( in turkey and in Canary islands) really a language? they have qualities to be ' referred" as language ( grammar, structure, etc.). However, assume that they're from different species than us. Would you conclude that they're just making noises and not talking in a language?
It is sort of a language, but to be precise it is a register of spanish, conveyed through whistling. The phonetics, semantics and grammar are conveyed through tone and length of the whistle.
@@scptime1188 so why do people (maybe teachers ) think that animals don't have a language? We don't know what it means or if they have grammar structure in their "language". Whales have dialects with their clicking sounds and also, researchers have already decoded Prairie dogs language. So, i'm not sure why people think that animals can't have a language when 99.99% of humans wouldn't be able to decipher the "whistle language". sorry just ranting.
Is there a citation for "dolphins don't have grammar"? I didn't think we were any where near understanding their communication well enough to make that statement conclusively....
Look at the movie "The grammar of happiness" which shows very strong evidence for reconsidering this "basic" traits of language, base on the Piraha Indigenous
The art style of the video reminds me of Roald Dahl's books.
Micael Ferreira Oops, found a scam!
Michael Ferreira definitely not clicking that link
The two replies are about a scam. Too bad, because this comment is good.
So... they're Quentin Blake style?
Ikr
but what if an alien looks at our language and says it is not a language because it is missing one of the features of their language?
Anyway, our language is enough for carbon-based life like you and me to communicate XD
True
that's exactly why science from the humanocentric angle is always flawed.
But he didn't say that animals doesn't have language .
BaconOfTheDarkSide oh ya haha
I knew that crabs were shellfish but not selfish.
I like that pun 😂
the crab from moana was selfish though...
Bro I love puns and punsters.😜🤪
Ha ha
I could correct you by saying, "*crustacean" but I'm not going to because the pun is funny XD
Of course they have language! The dogs in my neighborhood be having a whole conversation with each other 😂
@@306Bloodline pp
Is
@Sara Cole yo that's cool
Bees talk about food.
Prairie Dogs talk about predators.
Humans meme.
But only the dankest of memes
Foooooood!! 😍sparkle sparkle😍
bananian
I talk about food ALL THE TIME and I'm 95% sure that I'm a human...
You forgot two:
Bunnies talk about carrots
Nick talks about blueberries
Judy Hopps Don't bring furry cancer here.
Imagine the only way human beings could communicate with each other was through dance. Life would immediately become 100 times more hilarious.
For us of course. Them, not so much
So, it means No Obesity!🤣
Lol Michael Jackson would be king in that world 🤣
Well it wouldn't be hilarious cause it would be normal
Except it would be normal so wouldn't be funny. Is it funny that people make sounds with their mouths?
"after all, we are all animals" thank you, now i can show this to anyone who says "er no, we are humans not animals".
+Blaze Blue
Whereby man differs from the lower animals is little, most people throw it away
+Chubira Chu I guess a human excetionalist would argue that we are our own special category, although I'd disagree with them.
Animal is a term we invented to differ ourselves from other organisms.
In science and biology, we are animals.
In other contexts,mlikemlegal and social, we are not.
+Joseph Ang
Correct. But once I knew a guy who didn't believe in me when I said that humans are animals. He even went to the biology teacher and asked her this question in hope to prove me wrong. He was 8 years old though, so was I. :) Imagine his disappointment when he learned the obvious. I wouldn't imagine a grown man saying the same thing though.
Damn self-centered crabs only talking about themselves.
They are so shelf-ish! :-D
Kkkkkk
Daniel Valencia “I LIKE MONEY” - MrKrabs
Daniel Valencia hi
Sometimes I feel like most people are crabs.
I used to have a parrot that would talk nice to lure me to his cage and then he'd charge at me when I got close. He knew what he was doing.
@Sara Cole I guess this guy had some seriously funny reactions. Parrots love that but yeah, more often than not, people end up accidentally reinforcing bad behaviours like screaming and biting.
Do animals have accents?
Ducks do.
+Stephaney Gangadin Accents that are due to learning (rather than genes) are found in a lot of mammals and birds.
+The Scientist Hahah you see that at "did you know"
+Stephaney Gangadin wild Orcas do. different orcas from different oceans have been known to make sounds differently, however an Orca "tribe" or family has its own language, and also have different "accents"
they do
Who the hell dislikes knowledge?!
+Fiinsk the ignorant I guess
+Fiinsk A crab.
a human
Republicans lol
Lol, I meant to write "blind" in my first comment XD
Hello chicken owner here, they have their own unique language where certain noises mean different things and they have a wide variety of them. My one girl does velociraptor noises(not sure what that one means yet) I have never heard any other chickens make a sound exactly like it, she often commonly purrs and has different forms of chatters or complaints. The calls for alarm sound alike but are slightly different; for instance if its a false alarm and she wants attention, just laid a egg, saw a aerial predator, or a terrestrial predator!
When a chicken hears a egg song all the others will yell with that one chicken too in what I like to call a "Sympathy pain call" even roosters will do it. I believe its more to let them know they are there but its something that i still find interesting
i hope this is satire
did you eat her?
The radio show I heard about Prairie Dogs mentioned that, in tests, they could invent new words to describe something they had never seen before. That is rarely seen in animals. They lack displacement, but their current location and the current time are the most important things to them.
The video stated prairie dogs do have displacement.
yes, but prairie dogs still lack productivity and secreteness?
My cat definitely talks some serious shit when he gets hungry or agitated!! The human standard is Not the Only way to measure things!! Even with our language, only around 7% of what we say is actually conveyed in the words we use. The majority of our communications are in things like tone and non-verbal clues... Even though my cat just meows and things like that, I can genuinely understand several different things he "says" based on context clues, tone, body language etc!! I can usually tell what he is communicating!! And he 100% definitely uses more verbal sounds (meows etc) than he would in Nature because he totally does understand that WE communicate verbally and he understands that's how he needs to try to communicate with me!! He does the best he can with the limitations he has but he understands how to convey what he wants from me!! They are so smart it's crazy....
Dragon 9 No, cats do seem to be quite good at comunicating, they use difrent tones, gestures, body language, etc
Nah, it's not true that only 7% of what we say is conveyed in the words we use. For example, everything you just said conveyed a lot of information, and it was all conveyed in words. I can growl, bark or scream, but I won't be able to convey the information that I would convey by uttering the phrase 'I want to invest on real estate in China in 2019'. Well, you cat can't say what I just said. That's because, regardless of how awesomely smart cats can be, they lack language.
Your cat may actually have developed a specific laguage for you alone. I notice cats use different signals for the same thing to different people in the same family. It's also mentioned at the end of this article: www.thecut.com/2015/04/your-cat-is-trying-to-talk-to-you.html
What If animals tried to talk to us, but they gave up thinking we're too stupid...
They would watch us more and imitate our actions (such as a raccoon watching you take something apart/put it together and try to copy it and learn how it works
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
They probably already do.
Ever heard the phrase “So long, and thanks for all the fish”
There’ll be a few that still try
Sike u thick
So what is the next step in language development? What would a superior alien's language have that we don't?
Maybe smell and vision. Basically I see and at fall of a bridge then a week later I can show you what I saw.(with out using a computer) or what it smelt like
+matt THORNE so some kind of telepathy?
Probably words that can communicate color.
+Julliete Blackwood (The Blue Mermaid) Why just colour? The words could alter the senses of whomever your speaking to, to the point that their mind believes that their body is physically in the situation you are describing. I wonder what learning a subject like calculus would be like if language was that powerful?
telepathy accordingly to many alien abductees
It seems to me that we've created such strict stipulations for language so that no other creatures communications will fill all points and we remain unique. It seems to me language among non human animals would be any type of symbolic communication. If that's our definition then it seems language occurs in any animal that exists in a community. The more intelligent the animal the more complex the language
Monogrammar seems the most logical option.
The simplest possible language is a monogrammar ☝ language 📜. The grammar rule ➊ of a sentence existing is all the grammar needed. 😆
Directly translating a monogrammar ☝ language 📜 into the non-monogrammar ❌☝ languages 📜📜📜 humans 👥👥👥👥 have results in gibberish 😵💫.
Thus, in order to translate a monogrammar ☝ language 📜, you need to know a monogrammar ☝ language 📜.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyway, the point is, it is useful for AI 🤖, as it is modular, and easy to start learning. It can also be used as a reference for understanding common human languages. 😆
I lived with a variety of animals in my life. I have no doubt: all of them communicate and some of them have language. We just don't understand. If you pay attention to tour cat or dog, you will notice the variations on the sounds, like phonemes. The reasons behind the "limited communication" of many observed animals is likely due to natural conditions (very hash). If I put YOU in a jungle situation from chieldhood let's see how your vocabulary would be...
Communication yes, Language no. It's as easy (or complicated) as this. Our definition of language means that it has to have All traits of language.
II-V-I hello! I understand your point, since I also had the opportunity to study human development and language at college.
But have you ever observed how domestic animals start to use phonemes and specific gestures to communicate?
@@Sage2000 Yes, of course. But (I beg your pardon) I don't understand why you bring this up. Many domestic animals have a decent ability to communicate with humans but a) still no language because it doesn't have all traits (if we follow the definition in the video which I assume) and b) wild animals do have quite an elaborate system too. Which of course depends on the species. Highly social animals however like Orcas, Lions, Apes... communicate on a broad spectrum in the wild because their "lifestyle" (here I lack proper English vocabulary) requires to do so.
If you put a group of human children into a jungle they will most likely communicate a lot to survive. Even though their communication will be centered around different topics.
How culture, creativity etc. would be, however, that's a topic for another comment :)
@@Sage2000 Oh, and thank you for not mixing up phones and phonemes, always a pleasure!
II-V-I hey! That’s bellow the belt... I will fix the typo.
As you mentioned after all we are all animals. And this is why I am convinced that every animal can communicate with the same type of animal. As humans have their language in the same way dogs and elephants have their own "language" no matter if it is sign language, some voices, or even a dance.
Please give the animators of this video a hug and a huge thumbs up for me! Great job guys!
Fantastic definition of human languages. I've learnt something today. Love ted-ed.
The guy/team who directed and created the animations in the video deserves a prize!!!
Amazing!!
Anyone else laughed when the chickens were talking and what they were talking about? 😂😂
Oscar level Animation
Nothing like a good conversation about being turned into food
Thanks TED ED . Apart from the great knowledge . Can we please appreciate how great funny the animation is . Not only in this episode but also in all others .
An interesting lesson on the vastness of language and communication.
So Is math a language? I feel like it follows all 4 of those criteria.
yes it's classified as a universal language
Math is the language of the universe.
Yes of course maths is a language of science.. Go read the very first page of concepts of physics by HC VERMA .....
Great author
I don't speak math
The only thing I know about math is I hate it
Crows actually have different dialects for different regions. Calls from different states and even group's can differ. I crow call for fun, and if I am ever going to a new location I listen to recordings of group's from those areas and change my calls accordingly. It's very facinating. As they are extremely intelligent. I even feed my local crows and they come to a specific clicking noise I make, letting them know it's time to eat.. it's been years and I don't feed them regularly and they have taught their children my "feeding call" so they know where to get a free meal if they hear it, it's quite amazing they have passed it down and remembered it even though it isn't a constant feeding source.
i love the narrator's voice. its so soft and calm
I think there's another feature of language that you forgot: double articulation - using meaningless sounds to create meaningful words.
Example?
Tom H Well, /k/, /æ/, and /t/ don't have any meaning on their own, but you can put them together to make the word 'cat' which does have a meaning. With animals, most sounds and units of body language have their own meaning, and you can't put them together to make more complex meanings. A dog's growl usually expresses anger or superiority, and a whimper usually expresses fear, inferiority, or a want. So each sound has it's own meaning, and you can't put them together.
Interesting!
I am a linguistics student and every class talks about 7 different features (around that much I think). I'm kinda mad because the video oversimplified the features and now everyone here is acting like they came up with a groundbreaking idea when there are many other details to take into account. Of course animals have features of language in many cases, but the fact that they don't have all of them means that they have a COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, which is nothing like language. People really need to get educated before making outlandish claims.
my spanish teacher is a prodigy in tht thing!!!
I'm not an animal dude, this video just show me that we are so different, we were created with another special way to live. that's why we have the capacity to think in our purpose of live.
Biologically, you are an animal, no denying it. We were not "created" in the intelligent sense, although we are extraordinary compared to the rest of the animal kingdom.
2:21 Dude caught me off guard - just the way he says " and if he has _a gun_ "
I always love Avi Ofer's animations in these videos
I don't see any mention of dogs in this presentation. What an oversight!
totally agree
Jan Gephardt dogs aren't the only important animal u know ?
Of course not. But there's been a lot of research into dog cognition and their understanding of syntax, in recent years. It seemed an odd omission.
Or even more importantly, no elephants.
yea, crows too, and there was a parrot that used comunication with words like a 4 year old kid (search it, was a famous trained one) but if they added all of them would be so much
동물들이 언어를 갖고 있는지 알아보고 무었을 언어라고 정의하는지 배웠습니다. 또 언어와 관련된 4가지 특징 분리성, 문법, 생산성, 전위성에 대하여 배워서 무슨 동물들은 언어를 가지고 있다는 것을 알아냈습니다. 하지만 우리언어가 가장 좋은 것같습니다. 좋은 영상감사합니다.
the answer is of course yes,
Because
humans are also animals -_-
Wrong but I understand what you mean. Humans are mammals not animals.
@@christyprice1798 is a mammal not a type of animal?
lily ophelia It is and @christy price yea humans are animals. A living organism comprising of organ systems and a brain. Animals.
@@Jahnos then why aren't we called animals?
christy price Because humans separated themselves from animals (I think because we are more advanced and stuff). But we are still animals, just a different species.
This video made me feel special in this cruel world.
Technically, we can't say an infinite number of things with a finite number of letters and a finite amount of time. We could say a whole lot, though.
***** That's why I said with a finite amount of time.
+Shawn Ravenfire It's more about the possibility to say anything.
Shawn Ravenfire
Shawn Ravenfire if you limit the time, then there is no difference between infinite and finite set of characters. It is cheating
I was literally thinking this.
Very informative and one of the finest animations I ever seen by now.
crab and fish 0:10
Bee 0:25
praire dog 2:16
great ape 2:28
dophin 3:11
I love the how you pictured the future of chickens!
Wow, crabs are such narcissists
yup,because they talk about themselves.
I knew it since Spongebob Squarepants.
Yeah they are
h4 fan detected :)
I'm just wondering why y'all didn't talk about elephants.
The premise of this video is not correct. The narrative tells us that by human standards no other animal has a language. The problem is that we are superimposing our system of language on to another creature. this is the same as studying a tribe in the Rain Forest and deciding that they are not civilized because they do not have electricity. It may not be a great example, but hopefully you get the idea. when we meet a race of spacefaring creatures, they may think that we have no language, because we do not communicate in the same manner as they.
How can we determine if other animals have a language without completely knowing their means of communication? It is like going to country that speaks another language and unless you are fluent in that country's language and trying to form a sentence that makes all grammatical sense to that person. Most of us can not do that. We need to memorize certain words and phrases and bring along our little cross language dictionary.
Three examples of creatures that we know a lot about but can not communicate to them in their style, are the other primates, canines and felines. We can say the same thing with the cetaceans.
We are like children learning our parents way of communicating and still making silly sounds and every once in a while making a noise or gesture that makes sense to our parents.
+Lorie Franceschi Language and communication aren't the same thing. Language exhibits specific properties mentioned in the video, while a communication system is something more arbitrary.
+Svitri Magnusson You are putting a human value on language which might just be wrong.
+Lorie Franceschi The point of the video was "Do any animals have language comparable to humans?" And the answer was no.
The question was distinctly about human style language, not generic communication methods (which would be a different and longer topic).
+Peter Thomas they are trying to put a human language value on other animals. You can not do that and expect to get any answer close to what we think of as language. again my question is, can any of us speak in any other animal's language? No we can not. We can teach other primates and cetaceans who to do basic communication skills, but they are learning our language not us learning theirs. Do not put our way of thinking on any subject on to any animal besides our own species. Science is just not done in that method. if you speak another human language, you know that the way its grammar is put together it totally different than English. So how can we, as humans, know if another animal has a language that has grammar and syntax when the hundreds of human languages do not even match each other in the way they are put together.
In English we put the adjectives in front of the noun. In the Romance languages, the noun goes in front of the adjective. How do we know if the other animals do not have a different style of putting their adjectives with their nouns? We can not know because we do not speak their language.
Quit trying to put a human face on animal language it will not work and you will be laughed off the stage if you tried to put this in front of an audience of animal scientists.
Most animals do not have anything close to language, even if they have the ability to communicate.
Just rematch the video, language is different to communication.
Yes, there's a lot of research on a lot of things to do with animal language, some could be quite complex, others have bits and pieces but aren't anywhere close.
Even IF we find any animals with language, almost ALL of them don't have it.
Also, we understand human language quite fucking well, the entire study of linguistics is based on it. The last two thirds of your last response is assuming we don't know anything about human languages, or at the very least that we haven't extrapolated from it. Seriously, give science more credit than that.
1:33 that was so adorable
Dolphin: speaks animal jokes
Animals around: *laughs in animal*
I don't think other animals know the dolphin language
@@cuhpimp8084 that's the joke
@@Bleepbleepblorbus still the joke makes no sense
The style of the animation in this video reminds me so much of the works of Quentin Blake. Really takes me back to my Roald Dahl days
Thats how humans define their language. Of course nonhumans dont have same type of language.
Seriously, I keep clicking on to the next vid for the awesome animations. So funny!
we humans are so smart...im a very intelligent creation
and also a dangerous creature...
Are you a crab? 😂😂😂
Im gonna say it... I've enjoyed the animation more than the main topic... The topic is amazing thats why i clicked it.. But the animation was great
dolphins be like - "asl?"
+jitesh pabla American Sign Language?
+UshioKiss age sex location
3m Pacific Ocean
Everything on this channel is so interesting. 🤣💖 Just seeing the caption makes me want to click the video
I hear mice squeaking in the walls. I’m convinced they’re communicating with each other.
We are all animals but with good virtue and sympathy and behaviors we can become human.
Yes. Humans are animals. It’s just animals have a different way of doing it. I can’t believe we really think because they don’t talk like us they can’t communicate with others
I love this animation style. Beautiful video!
In other words:
"We can't really understand anything other than what we can conceptualize, so we assume they must not be doing so"...
I can understand the "continuum" because if the Universe is telling us anything, its that everything grows and develops, but knowing this same factor and that these creatures have been existed side by side for our entire understanding...
Why are you even asking this question? You, clearly, wouldn't be able to understand it anyway.
"so we assume they must not be doing so"
Yes, but that's not the end. After the assumption, we come up with ways to test if they're doing so or not. They fail all the test. We conclude.
That's how science works.
I don't know if that's the case or not. it would depend on if communication or language or whatever you call it is linked to intelligence.
Is it that animals don't have a language or is it that they just communicate different? It is possible if language is linked to intelligence that maybe they have more limited capacity for language. But while you may be able to look at all humans in the world and find similarities in all our languages we are all human. We all can speak like humans, we all have mostly the same physical abilities to speak, can make the same sounds as each other mostly, there may be exceptions with physical disabilities and mutations, but humans all have the same abilities to talk in general. Not all animals do. And physical abilities like being mute or deaf can effect human communication so it proves there is more than just intelligence that can effect it.
Using a combination of sounds pausing is what we call a word. Making another combination of sounds and pausing is called another word. If we keep making sounds, pause, sounds, pause, combinations of sounds, pause, that's called a sentence.
I don't know if this is what qualifies as a language. Maybe this is what qualifies as a, "human" language. Even if we had the same intelligence but were different creatures, would our language be the same if our physical abilities to both give out information, and receive information because our senses are different be the same? There probably are many ways of intelligently communicating without using a combination of something, spacing it out, and another combination of something to form words, and then using those words in a certain order to speak. Like you could use a specific sound and always have that sound mean the same thing no matter how the sound was made or how many times it was made, and have another sound mean something else, like how you can have sounds on a smart phone, one can mean there is a notification, one can mean a text has been sent, and the other can mean someone is calling you on the phone. And you can communicate that way without sounds. Like if primates use their gestures together to add things to what they are saying, or say things in more detail this could just be a more human-like way of communicating even if it doesn't use sounds. I think there are lots of ways of communicating that you could communicate besides how humans do. Is it related to intelligence? Maybe, but does a language being complex mean it has to be exactly like a human's?
Humans not only use sounds to communicate, we combine things in a certain order to communicate. The order may actually just be the way humans communicate. But we have body language which works totally different from our verbal language. If body language is so much about intelligence then why do humans have body language? I think body language is very different from how we think of language or communication. Body language is automatic. We usually think of communication as something we deliberately do to give information to each other. if that qualifies as a language and body language does not then you could say that animals do not all have a language because I think some animals only learn to read each other but do not actually learn to speak. Is this a matter of intelligence? Maybe. But it is just a different way of communicating. I think humans communicate purposefully. It could be our brain, it may also be because I think being able to communicate purposefully allows humans to control when we give out information or not. In fact I think humans use this to deceive each other mostly which is why humans like communicating deliberately rather than just reading each other sometimes. People will actually control their body language and facial expressions possibly subconsciously to hide information and even fake facial expressions and body language to basically lie and deceive people without words, and purposeful communication is easier to lie with so I think humans will often conceal their automatic communication so no one actually knows what people are fully thinking, their motives, feeling, etc... If people just let their bodies automatically do the talking then humans may be able to actually read each other better, because body language always means the same thing unlike how we could take the word apple and decide it means a chair instead of a apple, body language always means the same thing, it is not changeable, it doesn't lie. So intentional communication is much better if you want to conceal things about yourself or deceive. So yeah I think humans don't use automatic communication for that reason. Same goes for tone of voice and some evidence has shown our bodies actually produce smells like animals we could use to communicate but don't, we get rid of them. The smell communication some animals use also automatically I believe changes depending on the mood and other features of a animal. I think that intentional communication is done in birds, it could be intelligence, but the thing is that I think it may also be they cannot smell well usually, or at all sometimes, and smell is not so good for communicating in the air it seems because a lot of smells seem to not travel through the air well, plus I think too much automatic communication with body language could interfere with a bird's ability to fly. Where as I think humans do not want everything about them to be known. It is possible to could be intelligence too. Humans could probably use intentional communication in a lot of other ways than just with a combination of sounds, or letters. It is possible some animals have more advanced ways of gaining information than we know, but it is so different from how humans communicate it is harder to understand or read.
But I could be wrong, I am not saying I could not be. But it's just a idea.
1:23 I laughed way too hard at this 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The theory of language is made to understand each other then most of the organism or every organism are capable of using a language
So their "language" is universal? Like when dolphins from pacific ocean met dolphins from indian ocean, they'll be able to communicate?
I've heard animals have different accents and some species communicate differently in different places on earth. I'm not sure but I think it's not really universal
Koko also showed sadness when Robin Williams died. They had met before and apparently Koko liked him.
Animals: This is how we're gonna survive.
Humans: Coffin Dance meme
What if some animal language are missing some of those 4 properties, but instead have some kind of 5'th property that we (humans) lack or havn't even thought that a language can have?
The carb was like: Ah, man i thought i finally got a friend. in 4:38
I can just see these video because of the art and drawings. The crab tearing up when the speaker says it doesn't have such language skills had me🤣
When you realise dolphins were using tinder before anyone😂
I really enjoyed the show a lot, it was very entertaining and you helped me with my homework ...
didn't know taylor swift hunted prairie dogs
Language is to communicate, nothing else other than that. Animals also communicate through their language as humans do; however, I think the importance is humans can share various matters with details compared to animals.
"Are we going to be chicken nuggets?" 😂
+Merloki❧ valar morghulis
I love learning all these things about animals!!!
we are not all animals , but we all came from the same origin , thank you for the wonderful info❤
If you aren't an animal then what are you? Fungi? Plant? Some sort of alien lifeform? No, wait! I got it! You are clearly a robot.
Do all of one species of Animal communicate the same way, or do they have "Languages" within the species?
Are there differences in the ways an Elephant from the North of Africa communicate, to one from the South? (For example)
If so, is this akin to a different Language?
Or is it more of a Dialect or Accent?
If animals struggle to understand each other, do they try other forms of communication, like humans would use gestures or expressions if they dont know the language?
The difference between a language and a dialect is arbitrary, but your other questions are interesting though!
But crows have ALL of the requirements and you didn’t show them
Ravens are among the smartest and have been proven to meet this video's criteria and beyond.
When both comments and video are impressive and you can't go together than pause the video just like me and read the comments first🙏🏼
4:13 Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!!
Nice video. It is amazing that DNA possess all the qualities of language yet people deny it is a product of intelligence.
do animals talk about us, like we talk about them?
Language
1. The method of HUMAN communication either spoken or written, consisting of the use of words in a structured and conventional way.
But honeybees can talk... haven't you seen the bee movie??
Not necessarily language but I once saw a vid where a penguin that was COMPLETELY WILD walked up to a guy with a camera, stopped, put it's head down, and made this weird noise before checking him out and leaving, best greeting manners I've seen in this modern world tbh.
All creatures have language. Our problem is to measure their ability according our rules, which is the wrong approach.
Not really. "Language" is something only found to be had by humans. We, humans, have different intellectual abilities from other animals. That's why we're the only ones that display the cognitive ability of language.
Now, if you want to say "language" means something else, do it, but it will be your own personal technical term, not the actual meaning of the scientific term "language" as effectively used in science.
Manuel Luján exactly dude. Many species exhibit parts of human language, but not fully-loaded with the advanced components that makeup a true language ability.
Our language capability is open-ended, displaced, productive, and recursive.
Overall, humans are cognitively the most advanced species on earth. That’s due to both enhanced, and unique abilities.
We’re so advanced, that we debate over our dominant status. We study ourselves, and comprise scientific -ologies. We even form abstract concepts about making contact, with aliens, we consider smarter than ourselves.
I have a dog. Various animal species do have complex intelligences. Apart from humans, the animal kingdom is spectacular all within itself.
I suspect Hummingbirds have a very complex language. From basic greetings to describing complex locations for food.
Question: Do animals have language?
Conclusion: We are all animals.
Damn. After watching this I have feeling. How we became like how we are.
Where we focus life without smartphone is going to be okay or not, we forget all these buildings,religions,language,meals etc we created on Earth 😊
When RUclips titles end with a question mark, the answer is always "no".
so is a whistle language ( in turkey and in Canary islands) really a language? they have qualities to be ' referred" as language ( grammar, structure, etc.).
However, assume that they're from different species than us. Would you conclude that they're just making noises and not talking in a language?
It is sort of a language, but to be precise it is a register of spanish, conveyed through whistling. The phonetics, semantics and grammar are conveyed through tone and length of the whistle.
@@scptime1188 so why do people (maybe teachers ) think that animals don't have a language? We don't know what it means or if they have grammar structure in their "language".
Whales have dialects with their clicking sounds and also, researchers have already decoded Prairie dogs language. So, i'm not sure why people think that animals can't have a language when 99.99% of humans wouldn't be able to decipher the "whistle language".
sorry just ranting.
to think we fully understand the communicative means of other species is simply absurd
This video was very useful. thanks for making it
the animation was so funny
Is there a citation for "dolphins don't have grammar"? I didn't think we were any where near understanding their communication well enough to make that statement conclusively....
"We are all animals" then animals can understand english language.
Look at the movie "The grammar of happiness" which shows very strong evidence for reconsidering this "basic" traits of language, base on the Piraha Indigenous
that dancing bee it looks like is HIGH ON HONEY!
Lol
I didn’t know animals had language this is very cool
the animations look like a redbull add
I have chickens, by just constantly hearing the clicks you can find what means what like within language, but with sound
or like word coding
this is so wrong on so many levels..
How though? You cant just say that without context
that were some really nice animations/illustrations! Good job