Case discussion 17

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 окт 2024

Комментарии • 18

  • @cosmicseeker1069
    @cosmicseeker1069 8 месяцев назад

    One more reason could be non standard gp which might fail to match the master file and in turn the WL. Sometimes even diff brands can give us this problem! I had trouble using waldent cones compared to diadent which is slightly better!

  • @legendwei96
    @legendwei96 Год назад

    Thanks Dr Suresh, this will help immensely in my practice

  • @ramansingh3053
    @ramansingh3053 2 месяца назад

    Thankyou it was very helpful sir

    • @Aspire32
      @Aspire32  2 месяца назад

      Most welcome

  • @KavitaPatil-gn3jh
    @KavitaPatil-gn3jh Год назад

    Thank u sir sharing ur knowledge

  • @muhsinvengara2404
    @muhsinvengara2404 Год назад

    Sir fot fitting a 6 percent 20 gp is it mandatory to work with 6 20 file till the working length

    • @Aspire32
      @Aspire32  Год назад +1

      It depends. If it is wide canal then you may fit 6% directly. But if its narrow canal and u have done 4% enlargement then 6% cone wont go. Ideally one should enlarge the file to the same size of gp

    • @muhsinvengara2404
      @muhsinvengara2404 Год назад

      @@Aspire32 is 4 percnt enough for narrow canals...and also in curved canals

    • @cosmicseeker1069
      @cosmicseeker1069 8 месяцев назад

      ​@@muhsinvengara2404for narrow canals 4% enof. DrSuresh has mentioned about that in his othr vids. Do check it out.

    • @cosmicseeker1069
      @cosmicseeker1069 8 месяцев назад

      ​@@muhsinvengara2404in curved, u can't possibly go to 6% or even bigger size 4% as it might create ledges or perforation!

  • @fksmaker5067
    @fksmaker5067 Год назад

    Good sir

  • @bsk4627
    @bsk4627 6 месяцев назад

    Hi sir
    In which platform I can share my doubts regarding cases

  • @mishitachaudhary4187
    @mishitachaudhary4187 Год назад

    Sir please upload a case of 8 RCT too!! Need guidance for that