I had a Corsa as a rental car on my vacation last year, I was pleasantly surprised. A solid car for city traffic up to 120 km/h. Slightly sporty but pleasantly comfortable. definitely a small car that I would prefer.
As I am learning to drive in a 95 hp 2023 VW Polo that struggles more then this in 5th gear is pretty crazy. I have to shift into 4th if I want to go anywhere. That shows the torque this has that the car I learn to drive in doesn't have.
@@azaph_yt it is the driving school car yeah, it is also not a fun moment when my instructor tells me to go faster because it takes like a year for to actually go faster...
Wow this car is pretty fast for 75hp. A 72hp Aygo can barely reach 160kph while this one easily does 180. Probably because the Astra's engine has more torque.
Top speed and acceleration indicate that it's indeed the 75 hp version, tho I agree that it looks quick on video. I have the 130 hp / 230 Nm version of this car and it pulls very well up to about 180 km/h (but takes a long time to reach top speed after that and uses a lot of fuel if you stay there)
118 mph and stable not bad, just got one in silver for my place in Spain €15800 brand new would have been €23200 in uk ! But I don’t think I’ll be going over 120 kph😅
@@MrZillas Well my gf has a clio 90 hp, 900cc. You would think it would be a small economic little banger but guess what - every move you makeeee (sting, ahem) you have to raise the rpm high and as the gears are pretty short, you also have to drive at high rpm on anything above 80+km/h. if you want to start moving anywhere you have to drop a gear or two and floor it. The result is that in reality, that clio will do about 6l/100km while my 2.0 200hp polo will do the same with 7 liters. What I'm trying to say is that for proper economy use, this is not enough HP unless you really never drive above 50km/h. In which case the car is too expensive for that use only.
A 75HP car in 2024 is kinda wild. An old colleague got a Corsa F with a 1.2 and fuel economy is a constant issue for him, the advertised 4.4-5 is 8.5-9 and he's on highway 95% of the time. That fuel economy is worse than what I average in my 2007 Polo 4 1.4 at 7.3 and I drive it in cities and highways equally. Before I figured I'd just buy a used NA car instead of buying a brand new one at stupid prices I was looking at a Corsa F and a Fabia and for 1k€ less Skoda has a fucking 110HP offer with an automatic. Like, you read how efficient modern engines are and then there's shit like this.
@@hellcat69420 Read beyond the first sentence and you'll see my reasoning. Just because there's something more shit it doesn't justify this being shit. However, to reiterate what I wrote, it's a heavy car with a small ass engine that you have to spin high to go anywhere fucking over the fuel economy, something that cars in this category should excel at,. When cars decades older with bigger engines get similiar fuel economy there is something seriously fucked.
Mit 5 Gängen und der Leistung ist der halt nicht wirklich geeignet die Autobahn. Meiner hat 130 PS mit der 8-Gang-Automatik mit und dreht bei 100 km/h nur ca. 1800 U/min. Bei normaler Fahrweise kann ich auf der Landstraße mit unter 5 Litern fahren.
@@FabianSkilling soweit ich weiß, gibt es ab 2024 keine 8Gangautomatik mehr. Statt dessen ein 6Gang DSG vermutlich trocken. Mit vermutlich den selben Problemen wie bei VW.
It's very pully for its engine under 80kph, but still miserable and you need to revv the crap out of it to get up to speed. I don't find a single reason to have an 1.2 liter engine, especially with such a crappy fuel consumption.
What's the problem? 40 years ago people travelled with 25 hp through the country, 2 adults on the front-seats, 2 kids on the other seats, trunk full of luggage.
@@MrZillas Because of weight relative to the engine's power. a 75HP Corsa in the 90s was great, because those cars rarely weighed more than 900kg, this thing is at ~1200. Throw an AC into it along with the kids and wife and you'll be redlining to get moving at the light in the summer. Small engines with today's car sizes make no sense, because they're hurting the fuel economy, since you have to rev them higher. My Polo 4 with a 1.4 - mixed highway and city driving - gets better fuel consumption than my old coworker's 1.2 Corsa F - mostly highway - from 2023. We complained fuel consumption on the motorway last December and my car was 1L below his. 15 years of difference.
75hp? Need gloves for that one!
Ever driven a Corsa? Yes you do need gloves..
I had a Corsa as a rental car on my vacation last year, I was pleasantly surprised. A solid car for city traffic up to 120 km/h. Slightly sporty but pleasantly comfortable. definitely a small car that I would prefer.
not bad for 75 hp, but yeah it's not designed for fast work.
I own a Corsa 1.2 75hp now for almost 4 years, love it 🦾🦾🦾🦾
Me too, my first car and I love it
As I am learning to drive in a 95 hp 2023 VW Polo that struggles more then this in 5th gear is pretty crazy. I have to shift into 4th if I want to go anywhere. That shows the torque this has that the car I learn to drive in doesn't have.
The 100 hp corsa feels a bit sporty even, it has good torque for the amount of power (205 Nm).
@@azaph_yt The Polo I am talking about actually has 80 HP, so 5 more than this
@@hellcat69420 Is it the driving school car? I learned to drive in a 90 HP Diesel Golf IV, which was kinda like that too.
@@azaph_yt it is the driving school car yeah, it is also not a fun moment when my instructor tells me to go faster because it takes like a year for to actually go faster...
75hp perfect for Wolt deliveries. Low fuel consumption, low cost for maintenance. Better than clio or punto.
Low fuel consumption not so much, if you step on it it will go trough gas quickly, I tell you after being with this car for 3 years
für 75 PS echt nicht schlecht. Der Vordermann im Weißen Van hat eine leicht Aggressive Fahrweise 😁
I had one....and I ordered a new one.....A very good small car....and 75 HP are enough.....where could you drive a race in this days...😂
Astonishing
Great car for around town! MPG is rubbish as you need to work it hard,.
Wow this car is pretty fast for 75hp. A 72hp Aygo can barely reach 160kph while this one easily does 180. Probably because the Astra's engine has more torque.
Probably because the Corsa's engine has more torque.
Nice one. Thanks. Love Opel!
How about an electric Astra for interest sake?
I have the GS Line version with 130 ps, it is perfect for city and highway, and it has great handling!
No way thats 75hp...did you forget a 1 in front?! That moved like it had double the HP, like 150
that's what i m thinking about wow 0 to 150 km/h it's push like my mazda 6 2.5l 170hp ! crazy
I know right
Top speed and acceleration indicate that it's indeed the 75 hp version, tho I agree that it looks quick on video.
I have the 130 hp / 230 Nm version of this car and it pulls very well up to about 180 km/h (but takes a long time to reach top speed after that and uses a lot of fuel if you stay there)
Ngl, this is actually decent
a Corsa the size of an Astra is insane, what happened to small cars
It´s not even close lol.
@@aquilinorodrigo I meant the old astra's, card grew too much
@k3ramb083 Well, the '98 Astra is 4.11 and the new Corsa is 4.06.
I have it, gs line ... With fuel super+ I did it 0-100 to 11.7sc and max speed 188 km/h
118 mph and stable not bad, just got one in silver for my place in Spain €15800 brand new would have been €23200 in uk ! But I don’t think I’ll be going over 120 kph😅
A 75 hp car in 2024.... That's like selling a semi rotten horse back in the medieval ages.
It's a city-car, what do you want? I had 75 hp like 20 years ago too, and it was great to get from A to B. Way better than bicycle.
@@MrZillas Well my gf has a clio 90 hp, 900cc.
You would think it would be a small economic little banger but guess what - every move you makeeee (sting, ahem) you have to raise the rpm high and as the gears are pretty short, you also have to drive at high rpm on anything above 80+km/h. if you want to start moving anywhere you have to drop a gear or two and floor it.
The result is that in reality, that clio will do about 6l/100km while my 2.0 200hp polo will do the same with 7 liters.
What I'm trying to say is that for proper economy use, this is not enough HP unless you really never drive above 50km/h. In which case the car is too expensive for that use only.
Depends what you want, there is a 130HP 8 speed auto variant of the same car - that is suitable both for in the city and highways.
There is also a new car with 66 hp in 2024
+ why is it a problem for a car to have like 75 HP when it is a 2024 car model? ALso the 2024 Dacia Spring (EV) has 45 hp
Auto Abstract
Opel Corsa F
Acceleration up to 100km/h - YES
Can you do a video please with an Opel Corsa Opc please 🙏 ?
Do you think 130 hp version of this engine last long ? I mean a small engine but high torque and hp. It sounds susspicious to me.
A 75HP car in 2024 is kinda wild. An old colleague got a Corsa F with a 1.2 and fuel economy is a constant issue for him, the advertised 4.4-5 is 8.5-9 and he's on highway 95% of the time. That fuel economy is worse than what I average in my 2007 Polo 4 1.4 at 7.3 and I drive it in cities and highways equally.
Before I figured I'd just buy a used NA car instead of buying a brand new one at stupid prices I was looking at a Corsa F and a Fabia and for 1k€ less Skoda has a fucking 110HP offer with an automatic.
Like, you read how efficient modern engines are and then there's shit like this.
Why is a low HP car wild in 2024? And look at the Dacia Srping with 30 HP less than this with just 45 hp
@@hellcat69420 Read beyond the first sentence and you'll see my reasoning. Just because there's something more shit it doesn't justify this being shit.
However, to reiterate what I wrote, it's a heavy car with a small ass engine that you have to spin high to go anywhere fucking over the fuel economy, something that cars in this category should excel at,. When cars decades older with bigger engines get similiar fuel economy there is something seriously fucked.
Jawoll, nä der geht watt ? Besser als diese Porsche-Scheiße !
its 1.2 VTi ?
Why would that speedo ever go to 240. Bet they hoped there were some REALLY steep hills near the dealership.
Because you can buy one with 136hp that hits 210kph. :D
That way 100 is at the top and 30-40-50 are also easily seen.
It's not 75 hp. At less 100-110.
I can assure you it is, I have it too and this are the performances, surprisingly stable at medium/high speed and a bit sporty
iT'S NOT 75HP. I don't believe you
75 л,c ей ? это так производитель шутит ? туда надо было 175 л.c а не 75.
My 02 plate honda jazz will over 100mph and considering this is 2024 😅 that's slow
Кто ездил на оке вспомнит этот звук😂 3 цилиндра сила, ну что за современные тенденции😮 а по ресурсу как, кто знает?
Are you sure this only 75:hp!!!! Good car
Le 6 marce ci sono solo sulle versioni 100 o 130 cv😮
Quindi versione 75 cavalli sono 5 marce?
@@Gabriele-ps6zzyes
Peugeot car 🙄
2024 car with the interior of a 2011 car lol
Why does this car go better than my 90HP car? 0-100 its slower but above 140 its way faster
gearing
weight could also be a reason
75 hp?😅
Bei so viel Drehzahl ist die Sprit-Ersparnis dahin. Eben Dreizylinder.
Mit 5 Gängen und der Leistung ist der halt nicht wirklich geeignet die Autobahn. Meiner hat 130 PS mit der 8-Gang-Automatik mit und dreht bei 100 km/h nur ca. 1800 U/min. Bei normaler Fahrweise kann ich auf der Landstraße mit unter 5 Litern fahren.
@@FabianSkilling soweit ich weiß, gibt es ab 2024 keine 8Gangautomatik mehr. Statt dessen ein 6Gang DSG vermutlich trocken. Mit vermutlich den selben Problemen wie bei VW.
das ding is genau das selbe auto wie mein corsa von 2005
It's very pully for its engine under 80kph, but still miserable and you need to revv the crap out of it to get up to speed. I don't find a single reason to have an 1.2 liter engine, especially with such a crappy fuel consumption.
Only 75 horsepower?!
What's the problem? 40 years ago people travelled with 25 hp through the country, 2 adults on the front-seats, 2 kids on the other seats, trunk full of luggage.
@@MrZillas Because of weight relative to the engine's power. a 75HP Corsa in the 90s was great, because those cars rarely weighed more than 900kg, this thing is at ~1200. Throw an AC into it along with the kids and wife and you'll be redlining to get moving at the light in the summer.
Small engines with today's car sizes make no sense, because they're hurting the fuel economy, since you have to rev them higher. My Polo 4 with a 1.4 - mixed highway and city driving - gets better fuel consumption than my old coworker's 1.2 Corsa F - mostly highway - from 2023. We complained fuel consumption on the motorway last December and my car was 1L below his. 15 years of difference.
These are jokes laying on 4 wheels, not cars 😂😂😂😂
Slow and very underpowered i’ve driven one.
And very high fuel consumption around 8 l/100km because you have to use all the revs.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂you have helmet?? But for 75 hp is to fast…
this is worse then my corsa twinport 1.2 from 2005 with 80hp like for what reason would you buy a car that revs that high at 75hp thats made in 2024
Шумная очень.
too slow
بوني ع رجلك
Опеля эти ваши вообще на любителя, ещё и 1.2 75 лошадок, он вообще не едет, особенно если его загрузить