great video. if you change the loft of the Driver shaft how does this affect a pured shaft, my original driver shaft was pured (ping tip) for two clicks down to 7.5 degrees, but if I am moving it back to 9 Degree standard loft setting how does this effect the shaft? would this increase dispersion? is it worth getting the ping tip reset to match the pure setting at 9 degrees?
I recently purchased shafts that have been purred. When you say 12:00, do you mean with bottom of club flat and 12 :00 to hosel or 12:00 to the face of the club where impact is with club flat?
Hi Jim The alignment mark is at 12 o’clock if you look down at the hosel. The PUREd orientation is in the target facing plane. The mark is purely for installation purposes only.
Hi. The installation line is positioned at 12 o’clock but the pure orientation is target facing so technically 9 o’clock. It’s easier to align the shaft with the face than 90° to it.
I think the jury will always be out on Pureing. The measurements in the video , show the shaft in it's most stable position, but that's under horizontal force. The golf club is a rotational force and so, the relevance of that test will always be disputed. I've watched several Pured vs non pured tests , TXG's test comes to mind, where no difference has been found.
Many thanks for your comments and thoughts, always keen to hear everyone’s views. TXG invested heavily in a SST PURE license, before they were acquired by Club Champion, so you’d like to think they’d have carried out conclusive research on the merits before committing to signing.
@@Precision_Golf Sure they absolutely said that , but it contradicts the quantifiable and measurable data that they found in their driver v driver test, which displayed literally no difference. I've yet to see any video on RUclips which has shown a measurable benefit of pureing, and by that I mean a significant improvement in side to side and front to back dispersion.
@@GRIFF22 ultimately it’s a technology we firmly believe in to eliminate any questions of shaft instability. We have many experiences over the years of customers wanting a shaft PUREd and have eulogised about the results. Regardless we incorporate it into every build without a specific charge. PUREd vs Non-PUREd it’s the same cost. I know independent testing had been carried out, to what extent I’m unsure but I will get this data for you. 👍🏻
great video. if you change the loft of the Driver shaft how does this affect a pured shaft, my original driver shaft was pured (ping tip) for two clicks down to 7.5 degrees, but if I am moving it back to 9 Degree standard loft setting how does this effect the shaft? would this increase dispersion? is it worth getting the ping tip reset to match the pure setting at 9 degrees?
It will take it out of the SST Pured position so certainly best to have it reset into the resultant hosel position
I recently purchased shafts that have been purred. When you say 12:00, do you mean with bottom of club flat and 12 :00 to hosel or 12:00 to the face of the club where impact is with club flat?
Hi Jim
The alignment mark is at 12 o’clock if you look down at the hosel. The PUREd orientation is in the target facing plane. The mark is purely for installation purposes only.
Once pured, where does the line point to? Towards the target? I'm confused?
Hi. The installation line is positioned at 12 o’clock but the pure orientation is target facing so technically 9 o’clock. It’s easier to align the shaft with the face than 90° to it.
I think the jury will always be out on Pureing. The measurements in the video , show the shaft in it's most stable position, but that's under horizontal force. The golf club is a rotational force and so, the relevance of that test will always be disputed. I've watched several Pured vs non pured tests , TXG's test comes to mind, where no difference has been found.
Many thanks for your comments and thoughts, always keen to hear everyone’s views. TXG invested heavily in a SST PURE license, before they were acquired by Club Champion, so you’d like to think they’d have carried out conclusive research on the merits before committing to signing.
Hi Lloyd. Check out TXG’s latest live 19th Sept at 27 minutes.
@@Precision_Golf Sure they absolutely said that , but it contradicts the quantifiable and measurable data that they found in their driver v driver test, which displayed literally no difference. I've yet to see any video on RUclips which has shown a measurable benefit of pureing, and by that I mean a significant improvement in side to side and front to back dispersion.
@@GRIFF22 ultimately it’s a technology we firmly believe in to eliminate any questions of shaft instability. We have many experiences over the years of customers wanting a shaft PUREd and have eulogised about the results. Regardless we incorporate it into every build without a specific charge. PUREd vs Non-PUREd it’s the same cost. I know independent testing had been carried out, to what extent I’m unsure but I will get this data for you. 👍🏻
ruclips.net/video/g98OKRQ4QJY/видео.html