As regards Marie Farrell why would she risk her own marriage and family life to make a false statement about seeing Ian Bailey in Killfadda bridge the night of rhe murder then retract it after almost 10 years later? A GSOC report found no evidence of her being coerced into making a statement to link Mr Bailey to the murder.
The GSOC report that the officers refused to cooperate with? The same report that found pages had been cut from the job book around the time of Bailey being arrested? Why on Earth do you think that a report that the officers were not compelled to cooperate with, and then didn't, is evidence of anything to do with this case? Actually the only thing it is evidence of is that those officers who refused to testify were *absolutely* hiding something. How can you be so naïve?
"It isn't about believing he did it or not" - reminds me of the last interview Ian Bailey gave to Virgin Media - "It doesn't matter if you're guilty or innocent".
or resentfull because framed for few decades mybe theyre on the telly talking about him only statements taken got paid others didnt get paid so evidence classed as rubbish ?wouldnt bailey of said all the sorry he could to fix his realationship and not be bothered going kill strangers?
What a load of crap, twisting their words to you're own interpretation. Media jury at its best again. No one knows what happened and who did it. My opinion is that he is innocent but as I said it is my opinion and not a definite statement because I don't know and have no authority to claim I do.
You missed how he first says he's not making money off it, then at the end says he was paid some. Is it because he says they are making? And he hadn't for awhile?
Except that even after his death she states he is innocent. Even her daughter's that hated him have statements supporting him. So you believe the whole family are protecting Bailey? Because that makes sense to you, does it?
@@xmareirishx She has consistently stated he is innocent for over 25 YEARS not just recently. You also did not address the point that the daughters also supported him, despite hating him. How exactly do you explain that then?
@@random6809 Read my words... to change sides now would go against her... I believe the one daughter (the only one around that morning) stuck to her story about what happened, even when under pressure from others. I believe the daughters supported Jules, there is a big difference, maybe they were scared she may end up in prison, you don't know what her children were thinking... So do you support a self confessed rapist??? He wrote about it in his own Journal/diary. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_serial_rapists
Once again, excellent. Couldn't tune in live unfortunately.
As regards Marie Farrell why would she risk her own marriage and family life to make a false statement about seeing Ian Bailey in Killfadda bridge the night of rhe murder then retract it after almost 10 years later? A GSOC report found no evidence of her being coerced into making a statement to link Mr Bailey to the murder.
The GSOC report that the officers refused to cooperate with? The same report that found pages had been cut from the job book around the time of Bailey being arrested?
Why on Earth do you think that a report that the officers were not compelled to cooperate with, and then didn't, is evidence of anything to do with this case? Actually the only thing it is evidence of is that those officers who refused to testify were *absolutely* hiding something.
How can you be so naïve?
"It isn't about believing he did it or not" - reminds me of the last interview Ian Bailey gave to Virgin Media - "It doesn't matter if you're guilty or innocent".
I was asking myself if she insists in his innocence because she may have guilty knowledge and would be considered an accessory to the crime?
Or he is innocent and she believes him.
Bailey was resentful at the fact he wasn't able to profit off the back of Sophie's murder, but it wasn't for the want of trying!
Nick Foster has made plenty off the back of Sophie's murder, but that's ok with you, right?
or resentfull because framed for few decades mybe theyre on the telly talking about him only statements taken got paid others didnt get paid so evidence classed as rubbish ?wouldnt bailey of said all the sorry he could to fix his realationship and not be bothered going kill strangers?
What a load of crap, twisting their words to you're own interpretation. Media jury at its best again. No one knows what happened and who did it. My opinion is that he is innocent but as I said it is my opinion and not a definite statement because I don't know and have no authority to claim I do.
The bias is obvious.
You missed how he first says he's not making money off it, then at the end says he was paid some. Is it because he says they are making? And he hadn't for awhile?
Great video as usual. Thanks NATW.
Glad you enjoyed it
She knows he done it.
Except that even after his death she states he is innocent. Even her daughter's that hated him have statements supporting him.
So you believe the whole family are protecting Bailey? Because that makes sense to you, does it?
they are protecting the mother, Jules, you nonce.@@random6809
@@random6809 She has started legal proceedings against Netflix, so to change sides now would go against her. Not that she has a chance of winning...
@@xmareirishx
She has consistently stated he is innocent for over 25 YEARS not just recently.
You also did not address the point that the daughters also supported him, despite hating him.
How exactly do you explain that then?
@@random6809 Read my words... to change sides now would go against her...
I believe the one daughter (the only one around that morning) stuck to her story about what happened, even when under pressure from others. I believe the daughters supported Jules, there is a big difference, maybe they were scared she may end up in prison, you don't know what her children were thinking...
So do you support a self confessed rapist??? He wrote about it in his own Journal/diary. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_serial_rapists
The man ian is not guilty the law says it