Amen thank you guys for taking the time. Hopefully a pt 2 in the future. This question did shake up my faith, when dealing with these calvinst bible critics. If we don't have a PERFRCT bible, we have nothing, (that's how I feel). I came to the same conclusion about the Cambridge. I don't understand if these mistakes were just misprints, or mispelling? If so why don't they fix it? I couldn't find anything on pastor Knox explaining this. I ordered Ruckmans "errors" in the kjv bible. I heard he did an excellent job answering this. There are a total of 12 so called mistakes in this oxford vs Cambridge controversy. Most are just capitalization. You guys covered the main ones. I even seen two oxfords differing, this just stirred the pot even more for me. I just don't understand why these mistakes haven't been fixed, by true bible belivers? Why would oxford keep printing this? Anyways thank you guys, much love .
Acts 11:28 & 1 John 5:8 spirit in Cambridge vs Spirit on Oxford can you explain if it’s meant to be the Holy Spirit it should be capital doors this mean in the context do you affirm this is not speaking about the Holy Spirit
I respectfully disagree. Not understanding the revisions and purpose of those revisions will lead you to that conclusion. I have no problem with the 1611 other than the fact that most Bible believers are not using an actual 1611, because of the way some letters were written different in 1611 such as the "J"s were written as "I"s etc. this is what the revisions were for.
![LAVROV's interview with Tucker CARLSON 😁 [Parody]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mbMemqc-QEk/mqdefault.jpg)
Amen thank you guys for taking the time. Hopefully a pt 2 in the future. This question did shake up my faith, when dealing with these calvinst bible critics. If we don't have a PERFRCT bible, we have nothing, (that's how I feel). I came to the same conclusion about the Cambridge. I don't understand if these mistakes were just misprints, or mispelling? If so why don't they fix it? I couldn't find anything on pastor Knox explaining this. I ordered Ruckmans "errors" in the kjv bible. I heard he did an excellent job answering this. There are a total of 12 so called mistakes in this oxford vs Cambridge controversy. Most are just capitalization. You guys covered the main ones. I even seen two oxfords differing, this just stirred the pot even more for me. I just don't understand why these mistakes haven't been fixed, by true bible belivers? Why would oxford keep printing this? Anyways thank you guys, much love .
We have a perfect bible! The original 1611 first printing.
Very smart points.
Is the pure Cambridge edition a good KJV to get over the Oxford?
Good stuff brothas 💪✝️🙏
Amen! Glory to God!
Sin vs sins. Sin is like water. Unless it's in a bottle, it's unusual to talk about A Water or even An Water.
A little or alot, can drown you.
What about Ruth 3:15?
Acts 11:28 & 1 John 5:8 spirit in Cambridge vs Spirit on Oxford can you explain if it’s meant to be the Holy Spirit it should be capital doors this mean in the context do you affirm this is not speaking about the Holy Spirit
Neither. The 1611 Authorized not the 1769 Blayney Oxford or the 1901 PCE.
I respectfully disagree. Not understanding the revisions and purpose of those revisions will lead you to that conclusion. I have no problem with the 1611 other than the fact that most Bible believers are not using an actual 1611, because of the way some letters were written different in 1611 such as the "J"s were written as "I"s etc. this is what the revisions were for.