7 Most Successful Gambits
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июн 2024
- 👉🏽 Say hello to 1500 ELO 📈
chessvibescourses.thinkific.c...
😎 Play Chess Here:
www.chess.com/membership?ref_...
👚 Merch: Chessvibes.shop 🍒 Most students gain 200+ points in months:
chessvibescourses.thinkific.c...
🐙 Play Chess Here:
www.chess.com/membership?ref_...
These chess gambits will show up in the King's Gambit, Elephant Gambit, Alekhine's Defense, Caro-Kann, Italian Game, and Vienna Game. You will win a lot of easy games if your opponents fall into these gambits, so pay attention!
The gambits in this video are:
1) Elephant Gambit - Wasp Variation
2) Triple Muzio Gambit
3) Fried Liver Attack
4) Silberschmidt Gambit
5) Matsukevich Gambit
6) Meitner-Mieses Gambit
7) Landau Gambit
Timestamps:
0:00 - Intro
0:35 - New patron shoutout!
1:18 - Gambit 1 (61% Win Rate)
3:13 - Gambit 2 (62% Win Rate)
6:40 - Gambit 3 (68% Win Rate)
8:06 - Gambit 4 (66% Win Rate)
10:39 - Gambit 5 (66% Win Rate)
14:16 - Gambit 6 (69% Win Rate)
17:18 - Gambit 7 (86% Win Rate)
Favorite Books:
📗 Fundamental Chess Openings (FCO) amzn.to/2PPvSLl
📘 Winning Chess Endings amzn.to/3jraVBB
📙 1001 Deadly Checkmates amzn.to/3jpwXob
📒 1001 Brilliant Ways to Checkmate amzn.to/2VwqwHV
Chess.com and amazon links are affiliate links. 
Хобби
Stuck at 1000 elo? Not anymore: chessvibescourses.thinkific.com/
I'm stuck at 2200+ blitz lichess
stuck at 300
Stuck at 785
@@Kyle-lq4by How????
@@arijohn4138 lmao i’m kidding i’m 1000
Next vid: “to prepare for this video I analyzed all games of chess that have ever been played in the entire universe…”
“So i did some mining off camera”
@@dumbwinner2188 but for chess analysis
“As you can see here glipborp is trying to pin the queen with a bishop”
r/technicallythetruth
@@simaosantos6378 how is this "technically the truth"?
Knight on d6 can be taken by bishop on f8. 05:59
I was looking at this line wondering how this isn't winning for black. ND6 is a terrible move. Even the recommended moves before ND6 are pretty bad.
yes right
In the Caro line he also straight up suggests a queen hang.
Queen check and take the pawn on f4
@@thatcringelord??
at 5:57 Knight to d6 doenst fork king and queen. bishop would take the knight
but pawn g4 in that position wins the game
according to the theory black resigns there
@@tylerhloewen if you play Nd6 before g4 you loose the control over f6 and your position is basically trash
@@tylerhloewen that just attacks the queen, its losing since your literally down like a full knight while the opponent still has all of their minor pieces but you only with 2 rooks and 1 bishop. And also your position is trash at that point. Its literally -10… its -10 for white.. g4 is only good because its the only good move. Its a complete blunder of a position and pieces.
For the Muzio Gambit at 6:00 the bishop can capture the knight right
nasty fork :)
yep
Yeah, I saw that too. Its not much of a fork when the bishop captures the night. Maybe I missed something
they can however it would be better to go bishop E5
It can
18:15 Knight can move to g4, it's protected by the bishop.
Just kick it away with h3 and proceed
@@jonnyd595
Nh6 and you are protecting the pawn. If white decides to take with bishop, the gambit still doesn't work out because black now has the bishop open which prevents you to have to take with pawn.
The Landau variation occurs a lot in some blackmar diemer gambit declined variations which morphs into similar position. Always fun to employ and it doesn't matter whether you sac the queen or bishop first, same unfortunate result for black. Only mate better is a smothered mate when a pawn delivers mate.I've had that once but naturally it takes a certain brand of patzer to fall into that one :)
in the triple Muzio Gambit you said that we have a fork with the knight but the bishop could take the knight and a better move is g4 attacking the queen accorded to the engine.
I saw that too the bishop can just take the knight and there's no fork
YES! Stockfish says this move is +10 for black! Don't play this move it's a complete blunder leading to a rook pawn vs. rook knight bishop pawn endgame.
also in a "triple" Muzio Gambit there's no 3rd sacrifice,. You can't really call it a sacrifice, if it's safely protected.
@@HiArashi13 he sacs his D pawn, no? sac the knight, the bishop and then pawn would be the 3rd. but yeah he does say bishop is the 3rd
5:58 Bxd6?
I've been on the receiving end of that final gambit many times as black and have always just brought the knight back for no particular reason. Now I feel justified, never realizing that I was avoiding that follow up line
Just to point out that in the 7th Gambit near the start of it the knight on F6 can move to G4 as it is protected by the light squared bishop thus making the queens defence useless.
@@raysatadal1137king f6
i am glad somebody said it :') literally that's what they do 90% of the time
This channel is a gem, unlike many popular ones feeding on clickbaits. So much value. Thank you so much😊
Very instructive in learning new gambits if we can get the opportunity to play them, in the vienna gambit that you showed the only move after knight d5 is to take the pawn with check the king moves over then black's king plays f8, the only winning move for white after that is knight h3, then you follow up with h6 to attack the queen. This is a very complicated position afterwards, but makes for a fun game.
That bishop move was really amazing, I was thinking what just happened but then I realised it's Nelson bro😂😂🥰
Great content, would love to get one on one sessions, but these opens are all dependant on the response, I would love to see a top 7 black opens against the most used white openings, unless that wouldn't make sense?
Thanks for making this helpful video, now it's easy for me to decide what gambit to play.
Im relatively new at Chess, I love Nelson I’ve gotten out of his videos the most I’ve ever gotten among all the top Chess videos out there that I’ve watched. Thank you Nelson for giving us so much important information about the game of Chess.
In the caro-kann defense, the horse can go to g4 in the 4th move as it is covered by the camel and we cannot take it with the queen and if we move the f file soldier to f3 ,the horse can escape to h6.
Hence failing the whole Gambit/defence
First tournament in 7 years coming soon... www.patreon.com/chessvibes
Thanks for your video man 🥰
All of you YT chess gurus should start a go-fund-me page to collect money for the top 3 pay off for a on-line tournament. I bet you can collect some pretty big money for a 100% pay off to the top 3,---and it may be the best money any of you ever make with the game. Plus, you can structure the tournament the way you want,---not the way the russians do it. It would be interesting to see if it grows.
Good luck my friend.
NELSON LOPEZ is above the rest!! 10 out of 10 or a perfect 10!! Idea, presentation, clearness etc... all the best!! So deserves a HUGE THANK YOU!!!
You should totally do a video on the "C57 Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fritz Variation" with white playing d6, a very dubious move
At 13:40, what should you do if black plays f6? I'm thinking of Re1, forcing Ne7; then Bc4, e6; Bxe6 Qe7. The bishop is still under attack and it looks like black now has enough defenders.
This video is incredible. Thanks so much for putting in the work to show us this stuff. You're great at this, overall, btw.
Another example of why I keep coming back to my favored Chess Ch. Thanks for your research, Nelson, well done!
1900-2000 and beaten title holders with the first and second gambit, I wonder what the win rate for the wing gambit is, for me that works really well both against Sicilian and French defense.
5:58... you dont have that fork cause Bishop takes knight D6
Noticed that as well xD
Yeah....
Well theory says the knight is sacrificed
@@shinoasada4590 video says nasty fork.... not sacrificed... you got the follow up moves for this knight sacrificed?
Pfff plz never heard of the quadruple muzio gambit I guess ...
The "nasty fork" at time 5:59 is easily countered without apparent consequence when the dark square bishop captures the knight. Am I missing something?
Yes, you are missing the fact that the lesson is given by a weak NM, not a real GM.
@@draganandrei5356 but that's basic which we all cud find out..even a 1200-1300 can see that coming.
@@draganandrei5356 That weak nm still is quadruple your elo.
@@Love.Masculinity I'm 500 and I saw that lol
I think Nelson just missed (on Gambit 7) that Knight g4 is reasonable move, because Bishop is defending this Knight and you can't really have it with your Queen
I noticed that too, but white could just play h3 and kick the knight back to h6, which is not a very useful square for the knight
but knight can go to g4 even tough the queen is attacking it it is protected by the c8 bishop.
I was tired 🤦♂️
@@ChessVibesOfficial lol was like ughhhh pork king and queen while bishop is up there ughhh
@@meriamamistoso9917 actually its fork not pork, research the basic things before dropping a comment.😉
@@absolutezero049 wut
@@absolutezero049 grow up
In the King's Gambit (one of my favorite openings) you missed that black's bishop is defending d6 so the knight can't fork there
i liked this channel. its very chilly and really gives a chess vibes. i love how he didnt even put a song in it to preserve chess vibes. keep it up!
In gambit 5, a simple pawn H6 kicks out the bishop, which if bishop backdown, can be followed by G5
That's why it's only a 66% win I guess... My wife knows chicken shit about these gambits and openings, yet she would just make a move like pawn to H6 and I would be just sad
Great effort man! We appreciate it!👍
19:00, why does the queen have to take first? I can only see checkmate, even if the bishop was to take first.
rule of cool, mating with the bishop only is cooler than with a queen. practiaclly, there's no difference.
@@godofmoi96 That's what I thought.
You are great man!! Amazing info I really enjoy watching your videos and learning from you maestro! 🙂
15:51 Meitner-Mieses Gambit Black can actually play Kf8, looks weird, but does the job.
So clear ! Awesome video.
LOVED this video, very informative. It felt like you prepaired tremendously and it showed in the video!
The matsukevich gambit is easy to defend when the queen and bishop are attacking just put a pawn diagonal from the bishop so if the bishop takes then the other pawn takes and if the bishop moves one square away just move a pawn 2 ranks and block the bishop 12:44
Great stuff! Wanna try these out
thank you for all the work you put in this video man. the output sure is awesome
I play the Meitner-Mieses gambit! Truly super fun to play - the idea is that the Queen can not return to f6 when they take on f2, because of the Knight, so they no longer can protect their rook. You're also threatening to fork either side.
my favorite vid of yours. you do a really good job of raising everyone's game. thank you
I appreciate that!
i love the gambits, thanks for the video!
a few questions here
In gambit 2, when u go for ND6, it can be taken by the bishop on f8, white will lose a piece
In gambit 5, after Qb3, what if black plays pawn to e6?
In gambit 7 which was 86% win rate, after pawn e5, black can move their knight to g4 since it was protected by the bishop on c8, what will we do after that?
For gambit 5, bishop could just take the queen if black pawn to e6
@@irfavengers01 Are you all robots? I’ve started to like chess, I didn’t realize how competitive & serious it was growing up - What’s your elo?
@@seenitalready im not that good cause my elo is just around 1600 lmao, but chess is a fun game, especially when you succeeded in outwitting ur opponent
the triple muzio"s gambit was de the best i ever seen. Keep working in your videos, i enjoyed very much, Greetings from Argenitna.
13:40 black can move the pawn from I7 to I6 so if you move the bishops from I1 to C4 ,black can move the pawn from e7 to e6 and they defend everythink and your king will be expose
I'm 2000 and I love gambits/opening. This video was a lot of fun and had me laughing alot
5:58 "black can resign now"
*Black takes knight with bishop*
"Oh fu-"
Could u make a vid on how to use each piece appropriately on certain positions?
@Chess Vibes
At time 6:00 it is a fork but won't black bishop will take knight at d6?
Nelson love the videos, but how many times do matches go like this. Its like I have been waiting to play lasker trap but nobody ever goes into these,
In response to the Fried Liver I prefer not to just block the bishop with d5 but instead go into the Ponziani-Steinitz Gambit with Nxe4. The move is somewhat dubious but because of that most people won't know the line, and white can easily lose on the spot by playing Nxf6 (respond with Qh4, maybe eventually your dark square bishop joins the attack, and it's just impossible for white to defend everything). Nxe4 is a bit better but black still has the advantage after forking with d5. The only correct move is Bxf6+, but if you know the line you can get out without being much worse, which in my opinion is a fair trade-off for all the times that white falls right into the trap without a second thought.
Yeah that’s the best
Nah just tracker counterattack
You write f6 many times. You mean f7. Also 4...Nxe4 is dubious, hoping for 5. Nxf7. Sadly 5. Bxf7+ and white is winning (black is not worse but simply losing).
The lines are trappy, but are any of them sound, can you build a reliable repertoire around them?
Some of them. The vienna game, fried liver attack, kings gambit, and maybe the elephant gambit are all reasonable to build around. The traps against the alekhines, a specific line of the kings gambit, and caro kan are too niche.
@@cmck362 elephant gambit is extremely unsound
@@zappyFPS Not really. You still get playable positions as black and it pulls white out of their opening. It's definitely not 'extremely unsound'.
@@cmck362 ok 1600 elo dont talk to me
@@zappyFPS Actually I think I _will_ keep talking to you. Based on everything I've seen if both sides play the best moves white just keeps the pawn and stays +1 in an open game. That's not exactly unsound for a gambit and certainly not enough to warrant an 'extremely' before it. In fact, I'd go so far as to call it reasonably playable. Shocking, I know!
But please continue being an asshole. It seems like that's what you enjoy doing. I'm sure everyone respects you for it.
You should do one on the stafford gambit, the one Eric Rosen plays a lot
Great thanks to your nice chess gambit information.
Aww I'm sad to see the Smith-Morra gambit didn't make the cut, personally my favourite gambit
6:00 you got this nasty fork and black can resign now
The f8 bishop's honest reaction
I like watching your videos ... very smart and organized
Please keep posting
You teached me alot, you are a great person, we are lucky to watch you.
Love a few of them, nobody ever plays kings gambit. In the last trap vs Caro Kann, I need to see the continuation if they take the pawn. Normally play the 2 knights defense
The trap doesn't land if they take the pawn. I would consult an engine for the mainline in that case.
Another excellent video! Thanks.
I like the content I really do, but i dont honestly see someone protect a pawn with a bishop for so long at 12:51. I think the most reasonable response would be for bishop to move out of c8 and move to e6. it provides an attack on your queen while being protected by a pawn, they are either forced to move queen or trade the queens and make the game last longer.
Nelson , I have been watching your videos for a long time and I have learned a lot.Thank you!
At 14:06 what do you play when black moves his pawn to h6 attacking the bishop?
Whats the app you are using below your video
Can't wait to try some of these out, cheers Nelson
Hi chess goals!
@@chesstactics5796 hi mate 😆
Also I don't know if you done a video of the TRAXLER counterattack but it might be an interesting video idea. It's one of my favourite lines of the fried liver. You get lots of wins
I've been spending some time with the Triple Muzio Gambit (I'm studying King's Gambit as my main) and after 10. Be3, Qg7 (the move he says is best for black) - I'm surprised to find that Black is winning?? Engine says 2.2. And after 11. Qxf4+, Nf6 12. Nc3 - Black is now winning 2.4.
Even though Black is initially underdeveloped, with some careful play they can equalize or even come out on top. Plus, they can line up an attack on the g-file that could be tricky for white. Honestly, unless your opponent is a straight bot I wouldn't recommend the Triple Muzio to King's Gambit Players.
9:52 regardless if king moves up or to the side, knight can move to g6 threatening the queen and checking the king (unless the king moves to d8
h7 pon : Am i joke to you?
5:59 is there any reason one can't take the knight with Bishop 🧐?
nope. Nd6+ is the wrong move and a losing one. g4 is the winning move in that position
I didnt see you cover it, I notice in quite a few games I've played King's Gambit, Black takes King side Knight to f6 after white develops our own king side knight to f3, attacking the pawn...maybe I'm playing it wrong, but I've been losing whenever I develop a piece rather than attack blacks knight.
Could you do a video on the Ponziani-Steinitz Gambit against the Fried Liver? With 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng6 Nxe4 It's a beautiful gambit with so many lines for Black and has a pretty high win percentage too. I'd love to know your thoughts on it
It’s crap. It’s completely lost after Bxf7+. Even if white misplays it they get a better position usually
@@polychromaa All gambits have perfect lines to play against. Gambits by nature give up material and with perfect play are just blunders. The point is that they have traps and better development which give an edge
@@thetotalitarianturtle3755 a lot of gambits against perfect play are not blunders. For example I would say the Evans gambit against perfect play is quite reasonable. Nxe4 there in my opinion is a blunder. It is extremely easy to get some sort of advantage with white. I spoke with a person who played this gambit, they said white would usually play suboptimally, but still end up with a +1 or +1.5 advantage!
@@polychromaa You can check the Lichess database, it shows Black winning the majority of the time with 54% at that point and winning 71% of the time when White takes on f7 with the knight and Black follows up with Qh4.
While it certainly won't work against someone like Magnus Carlsen or master rated players, 69% of people who get to to move 5 make the wrong move. And that drops even lower where only 3% of players on White make the best move on move 6 with Qe2.
This isnt meant to be a 100% fool proof gambit played at GM level, just a fun gambit to play in Blitz or Bullet that score some fun wins which is what this youtube channel shows and talks about. I never claimed it was perfect, just that it was a fun and beautiful gambit with a high win percentage which it is
Thank you very much for your good effort to make these GOOd wideos :)
In the muzio gambit kd6 is not a fork because the bishop can just take and strengthen blacks position overall unless there is something I am not seeing which is very likely.
The Elephant Gambit is one I've been using quite often!
18:20 The knight can sill move to g4 guarded by the bishop
Truly helpful stuff!!!
18:55 can someone explain me why does it have to be taken with the queen? It is the same if the bishop takes first and then give the checkmate with the queen right?
At 5:58 you say you could fork my king and queen but what would be your response if I played Bishop takes knight?
@10:20 couldn't knight from e5 go to g4 to attack bishop and defend check spot?
2:05 for the elephant gambit, when you’re in this position, what would you do if white decided to capture the a3 pawn with the bishop with check, rather than with the knight?
You slide ur king up and have all the same threats
Elephant gambit is absolute trash tho still don't play it
Please make a video on how to beat stockfish in 4 moves. Thanks 👍
Great video, very helpful.
Hell yeah! Good luck bro!!
For the DOUBLE MUZIO Gambit at 5:39, if white plays Qd5 check, black will most probably play Qe6 and then white can take the pawn on f4, giving check and then counterattack somewhere by saving the Queen.
Am I right???????
Please reply
Love your videos. Why have you been away from OTB for so long ?
5:58 Nelson sir , the knight can be captured by dark bishop .
13:18. Can't we slide the queen to c8 to save checkmate
I think after Qc8:
Bxf7+ Kd8
Be6 Nd4 (Na5 you can just move your queen)
Bxd7 Nxb3
Bxc8+ looks extremely winning
@@DrPyle-ys2xn after BxD7 can't we capture the bishop with queen??
When you played Nd6 in the Muzio gambit, Black can just take it with the bishop right?
Thank you!
I used the Fried Liver Attack and my enemy didn't know how to respond so I got a mate in 9!
Awesome video TY
2:08 what if white instead of capturing with the kinght they capture with the bishop checking your king? I Know it's better to capture with kinght as they're attacking your rook but what if they use the other piece?
The aim of the attack is to capture the rook or queen
One thing: you should make a video on the Nakhmanson gambit
Its super deadly
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. O-O Nxe4 6. Nc3! dxc3 7. Bxf7+ Kxf7 8. Qd5+
Amazing work bro.keep it up
5:59 the d6 sqare is covered from the bishop on f8
Thanks for the fun video. I would note, however, that after 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Bd3 Nf6? 4.e5, you say that Black can't play 4...Ng4 because White's queen controls that square. But so does Black's bishop. I'm not saying that Black's game is wonderful after 4...Ng4, but he doesn't lose a piece as you imply.
I was gonna say the same thing. It wouldn't make sense not to move the knight there unless there was some kind of cunning queen sacrifice he had in mind
Thank you 😊
Thanks very much. I thought i would never use landau gambit but second game after watching video i played aganist caro kann and won easily :)
Where's the video on the Meitner-Mieses Gambit??? I can't find it! @ChessVibes!
Here you go: ruclips.net/video/KqXlw5uWUog/видео.html
at 9:53, the knight can fork the rook and queen (potentially king too) if Ng6 ? Or am I not seeing something
H7 pawn