Hi Tony, I'm confused as to why when you take the step from u to u* the "yh"-term turns into "h^2". Any chance you could clue me in on whats happening there? Many thanks in advance.
@@ProfessorSaadExplains at 5:07 your have u(y)=(1/mu)(dp/dx)(y^2-hy)+(Uw/h)y ; you then develop u* as u(y)/Uw and conclude at 5:29 u*=u(y)/Uw=y/h (moved from the back of previous equation) +(1/mu)(dp/dx)(1/Uw)
@@ShuffleJosh I found the same. I believe this is simply a mistake copying from one page to the next. it should be (*)[y^2 - hy] and simplifies in the end to u* = eta + alpha(eta^2 - eta)
Hi Tony,
I'm confused as to why when you take the step from u to u* the "yh"-term turns into "h^2". Any chance you could clue me in on whats happening there? Many thanks in advance.
@@ProfessorSaadExplains at 5:07 your have u(y)=(1/mu)(dp/dx)(y^2-hy)+(Uw/h)y ; you then develop u* as u(y)/Uw and conclude at 5:29 u*=u(y)/Uw=y/h (moved from the back of previous equation) +(1/mu)(dp/dx)(1/Uw)
@@ShuffleJosh I found the same. I believe this is simply a mistake copying from one page to the next. it should be (*)[y^2 - hy]
and simplifies in the end to u* = eta + alpha(eta^2 - eta)