Warren, Anthony Mundine, Jacinta & Bess Price, Anthony Dillon are just a few of the admirable, intelligent and honest Aboriginal Australians we're all so very lucky to have. I'm very grateful.
Taxpayers give $30B annually for 984,000 people (3.8% of the population) • Expenditure per person in 2012-13 was $43,449 on Indigenous Australian compare to $20,900 on other Australians a ratio of 2.08 to 1 and increase from 1.95 in 2009. 3,278 Aboriginal corporations • 243 Native title bodies • 48 Land councils • 35 Regional councils • 122+ Aboriginal agencies • 3 Advisory bodies • 145 Health Organisations • 11 Indigenous Federal MPs • 12 Culturally important Indigenous days • Senator Price says Australian taxpayers spend at least $100 million a day on direct support for Indigenous Australians. Every year $39.5 billion of direct government expenditure every single year. The figures are based on the 2017 Indigenous Expenditure Report produced by the Productivity Commission. Issues of racial and social injustices are hardly ousted by elevating and heightening race (cultural identification, credentials). Especially on a political level, but also within the wider community. The Voice to Parliament is all about adding a new “Elite Canberra-based bureaucracy” in the constitution rather than reconciliation or recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Australia has over 270 cultures, let’s embrace them all, but most importantly let’s embrace the Australians who make up our country first. The individual, and not limit Australians as only their cultural identification, credentials. It began with a separate flag, (Hardly a unifying symbol. Oh you guys aren't Australian?). And has ballooned to billions of taxpayers money funding, and Acknowledgement of traditional owners, the loss of the ABC (now a mouthpiece for the cause) and a generational attack, offensive, assault on muti-cultural Australia that has left us divided, and embarrassed of Australia’s wonderful past. All to serve the self seeking, selfish interests of a very small militant, embittered and clearly corrupt organisation. This small ‘elite’ group has garnered incredible levels of power, and influence thanks to some very clever, and less than honest use of any available manipulation available to them, especially the weaponization of race. For decades our schools and Australian society in general has attacked, shamed and reviled our European heritage, while conversely literally inventing, exaggerating, and simply fantasising over Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ‘culture’. The Voice is not a path to reconciliation, and harmony it is a path to entrench structural racism within our nation's constitution. Something that should be abhorrent to all Australians but particularly so to Indigenous Aboriginal, and Torres Strait Islander’s. So please Greens, and The ALP don’t lecture and moralise any Australian on our tolerance, open-mindedness, or our almost universal acceptance of the Aboriginal people. The Voice is fluff, popular, crowd-pleasing, and overt virtue signalling, encouraging intolerance, narrow-mindedness, and dogmatism. Yet beyond this reality. The Voice is another expensive misuse of money that could and indeed should be actually being used to improve the lives of Australians. And perhaps even used to improve the lives of all Australians in need, without any thought to their race? Or their cultural background! Victimhood culture has taken over the Australian political landscape. Victimhood culture is another technique in obtaining power, and silencing opposition. The moment Australia stepped over the line from equality to a favoured group, we took a massive misstep. Vote no to this scam
So glad to see the Mundine family standing up for the NO vote this voice will not help indigenous people. Glad to see they don’t want to divide our country with apartheid. Vote NO
Every Labour leader since Whitlam has pulled this kind of grandstanding when they get into office. They have no interest, nor the ability, to take this country forward FOR EVERYONE HERE.
If you're referring to primary vote, the preferential voting system isn't designed to put the most popular in government, it's designed to put the least unpopular in government, and that's not always the same thing.
@@xpusostomos Yes but under the mandatory preferential system which applies in Australi's federal elections, we are only really given a choice between two outcomes. That could be changed under our current mandatory preferential voting system if 50.01% in each of a majority of electorates voted for the non-major parties, so it might be argued that, collectively, we get what we desire (i.e. that least unpopular alternative you refer to). But I would argue, the mandatory (and thus essentially undemocratic) nature of our federal election voting unfairly precludes us from reaching that point - which we could more easily under OPTIONAL Preferential voting - of deciding that government alternatives of either Labor or Coalition - are, in fact, both worse than a third minor party alternative. [I would finally argue, that for anyone preferring First Past The Post (not you I assume), optional preferential will preserve a degree of protection against the election of the most unpopular alternative - something which FPTP is prone to delivering].
@@grellis6483 I don't know what you mean that under preferential voting there are only 2 outcomes. That's not the case at all. It's also not the case that anybody needs 50.01% first preference votes to win. You could be the 2nd worst candidate in 1st preferences and win. Imagine Liberal get 30%, Labor 20%, Independ A, 12%, Independ B 15%, Independ C 16%, Independ D 9%. If everyone is preferencing Independ A, then he will pick up Independ D's votes, and pull up to 21% ahead of Labor. Then he's get B's votes and get to 36%. Then he'll get C's votes and get to 52%. The fact that most people put Ind A as 2nd preference means he was the least unpopular and gets over the line. In 1st past the post, the most popular wins, popular meaning gets the most 1st preferences (of course there are no 2nd preferences). Optional preferences don't help you at all, compared to just putting Liberal and Labor last. In optional preferences you don't have to get to 50%, because nobody might. So you just have to keep reallocating until 2 candidates are remaining. If those 2 are Lib and Labor, then you get the same answer. If they are Lib and some independent, you get the same answer. Actually your issue, if you want less major parties is not the preferential system, it's the one-candidate-per-region model, which always results in a 2 party (more or less) state. If you don't want that, you want something like the Hare-Clark voting system (as used in the Australian capital territory) where say 3 or 4 candidates are elected per region, then you'll get 4 or 5 parties having to cooperate for power (for good or bad).
@@xpusostomos I accept the validity of your example - that's how minor parties CAN win but only so long as the major parties don't swap preferences. And unless their combined vote is less than 50% then one of them will win. So a third party must get 50.01% of the primary vote in such a three way contest. (Yes, you are again correct, the 3rd party, could win with less than 50.01% of the primary vote by relying on the preferences of other minor parties. My example was a simplified three party model just to convey the difficulty of winning three cornered contests against the majors where the mandatory requirement to vote for them makes it so difficult to surmount their combined vote. I could have avoided that confusion by not saying 'primary'). We've certainly seen the major parties swap preferences in recent times, and my estimation is that increasingly, as the tide rises against them, they will resort to this to ensure mavericks are excluded. When the mandate is removed, the total number of distributed preferences is lower as many voters will cast fewer or no further preferences. This, in turn, lowers the size of the vote required to defeat a combined major party vote. You obviously understand this from what you have to say about optional preferential. I don't consider what you say is necessarily wrong as the system mostly operates now but for the reasons I've outlined, its not where I see Australian politics going, which is ever greater preference swapping between the majors. Whatever the various benefits and disbenefits of Hare-Clark etc (I lived in the ACT for decades), optional preferential provides the opportunity to lower the threshold to defeat the entrenched uniparty without the real dangers posed by FPTP. And, as I assume you appreciate, it is also obviously a democratic system as opposed to mandatory preferential voting which is actually quite totalitarian in that it effectively allows the parties to dictate you provide them a preference. Indeed, its as good as them looking over your shoulder! With so much overheated controversy for decades about it being compulsory to turn up to a polling booth to have your name checked off a list - which I consider a perfectly reasonable democratic safeguard of voting system integrity - it amazes me more people don't identify where the really undemocratic compulsion lies.
The only positive thing to come out of the Voice nonsense. Is that Australia and Australians can now see who genuinely cares about our country, and who’s taking advantage of Australians' better natures. 🥰Thank you Jacinta and Warren you are true Australians supporting all Australians no matter what their heritage. Bring Australia together. Australia is for all Australians equally, with objectivity, fairness, impartiality, and even-handedness.❤🇦🇺🦘
The passion from this bloke is a very powerful thing to see. This man believes in what he's talking about! And, he's also spot on! I've seen a single person on the Yes side of this vote with the same passion, and if they exist it's for personal gain. Mundine and Price are a total contrast to Burnie and Mao.
Bless Your Soul Warren !! Stay Strong we Need A Voice like you against All Narcissistic Leaders Thats The Voice Thats Needed Rout out these Evil Leaders and Unite Australians Warren Regardless of Creed or Race❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Spot on Warren,You are a legend and no one could have said that better. Your speech made me tear up, a very meaningful speech. I came to Australia 54 yrs ago, l am forever grateful and love this country to bits. NO DIVISION PLS, AND ITS A GIANT "NO" FOR ME.
Warren you are a true Aussie bloke and Jacinta you are an amazing woman. Take care as you battle this yes campaign that will divide us. We stand with you. Vote No and we hope the ,"ears" will listen and help your people in remote communities in the future. It's insane the amount of $ the yes group have to spend.
Prime Minister Mr. Albanese now pleads “Don’t close the door”. But Mr. Albanese. Hang on Mate! The wording of the referendum proposition already leaves the “door open” for the voice body to change its function and purpose from the very minute the referendum passes or at anytime in the future. Mr. Albanese touts “advisory body” or now touts a “structured advisory body” or an “advisory committee”. But the wording in the referendum proposition clearly states “a body” only. The legal definition of an “advisory body” and “a body” have different legal meaning and interpretation. A simple parliamentary consent given by any elected government who commands or can command a majority vote in the parliament can grant the voice body a new power or powers overnight to change the function and purpose of the voice body. This is the trick in the trap as the proposition door has been deliberately LEFT OPEN for such a purpose. This means that the proposition wording has the potential to send Australia down a similar roadway that New Zealand has already travelled only to find out later too late to return Australia. Pull back the curtains and blow away the smoke and WRITE “NO”. 🇦🇺💯%
Keep going Warren. Stand tall and strong. This Government is WEF WHO UN backed and this gov is not in the least in the welfare of Aboriginal people.Moreover the Communist party in Australia are deeply involved in the voice. And Albo as connections to the Communist Party of Australia
No!!!
with you all the way mate. You are one beautiful man
WARREN PLEASE COME TO SOUTH AUSTRALIA, AS SOME PEOPLE DONT GET IT HERE!!!!
VOTE NO!
Warren and Jacinta are already my voice and I will take instruction from them! NO NO NO
Good on ya mate👍
He's absolutely correct.
Spot on Warren, nobody could have said that better! I am voting NO!
Just vote NO !
Good on ya Warren 👍
...and thankfully, Warren is the voice of reason, sanity, and experience
for sure
And crush it we will.
That is right Warren don't let Albanese push you around your better than him Albanese is just a bully
We are with you Warren and Jacinta, hopefully people are listening to you.
Strong Voice Warren. Albo the flog owes you a huge apology.
good on you Warren Mundine for calling the slimey grubby Albo out - awesome
I trust Warren & Jacinta MAY GOD HELP the NO VOTE TO GET UP
What a legend and what a beautiful speech. No to dividing Australia on the basis of race!!!!
Warren, Anthony Mundine, Jacinta & Bess Price, Anthony Dillon are just a few of the admirable, intelligent and honest Aboriginal Australians we're all so very lucky to have. I'm very grateful.
Warren for PM
Bravo, real leadership.
Buddha bless you Warren.
It’s absolutely a NO NO NO
Warren is a good man. I have met him.
Warren Mundine is a national treasure.
Who gives a shit about him.
Haha he’s the original public purse mooch
Yes he is ❤
Make that man Prime Minister
Well ??? I thought Jacinta would be good PM material ( I have met her ) but in all honesty I think Malcolm Roberts would the best PM for all .
Well said Warren . VOTE NO AUSTRALIA .
Taxpayers give $30B annually for 984,000 people (3.8% of the population) • Expenditure per person in 2012-13 was $43,449 on Indigenous Australian compare to $20,900 on other Australians a ratio of 2.08 to 1 and increase from 1.95 in 2009. 3,278 Aboriginal corporations • 243 Native title bodies • 48 Land councils • 35 Regional councils • 122+ Aboriginal agencies • 3 Advisory bodies • 145 Health Organisations • 11 Indigenous Federal MPs • 12 Culturally important Indigenous days • Senator Price says Australian taxpayers spend at least $100 million a day on direct support for Indigenous Australians. Every year $39.5 billion of direct government expenditure every single year. The figures are based on the 2017 Indigenous Expenditure Report produced by the Productivity Commission. Issues of racial and social injustices are hardly ousted by elevating and heightening race (cultural identification, credentials). Especially on a political level, but also within the wider community. The Voice to Parliament is all about adding a new “Elite Canberra-based bureaucracy” in the constitution rather than reconciliation or recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Australia has over 270 cultures, let’s embrace them all, but most importantly let’s embrace the Australians who make up our country first. The individual, and not limit Australians as only their cultural identification, credentials. It began with a separate flag, (Hardly a unifying symbol. Oh you guys aren't Australian?). And has ballooned to billions of taxpayers money funding, and Acknowledgement of traditional owners, the loss of the ABC (now a mouthpiece for the cause) and a generational attack, offensive, assault on muti-cultural Australia that has left us divided, and embarrassed of Australia’s wonderful past. All to serve the self seeking, selfish interests of a very small militant, embittered and clearly corrupt organisation. This small ‘elite’ group has garnered incredible levels of power, and influence thanks to some very clever, and less than honest use of any available manipulation available to them, especially the weaponization of race. For decades our schools and Australian society in general has attacked, shamed and reviled our European heritage, while conversely literally inventing, exaggerating, and simply fantasising over Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ‘culture’. The Voice is not a path to reconciliation, and harmony it is a path to entrench structural racism within our nation's constitution. Something that should be abhorrent to all Australians but particularly so to Indigenous Aboriginal, and Torres Strait Islander’s. So please Greens, and The ALP don’t lecture and moralise any Australian on our tolerance, open-mindedness, or our almost universal acceptance of the Aboriginal people. The Voice is fluff, popular, crowd-pleasing, and overt virtue signalling, encouraging intolerance, narrow-mindedness, and dogmatism. Yet beyond this reality. The Voice is another expensive misuse of money that could and indeed should be actually being used to improve the lives of Australians. And perhaps even used to improve the lives of all Australians in need, without any thought to their race? Or their cultural background! Victimhood culture has taken over the Australian political landscape. Victimhood culture is another technique in obtaining power, and silencing opposition. The moment Australia stepped over the line from equality to a favoured group, we took a massive misstep. Vote no to this scam
Well said Warren Mundine you just spoke from the ❤ and is shows . 👍🤝👏 I stand with you and voting an enormous NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Well done
Well said Mr. Mundine, I will be voting NO !
Good on ya mate I've been no from the start and will be to the bitter end make no mistake this will be a street fight and it's all on us to fight it .
Spot on ✊
As always spot on Mr Mundine. You have total respect. Vote No Australia.
Fk mundine, his not indigenous.
Onya Wassa. Vote NO.
Well spoken warren 👏👏👏
Warren Mundine, a great Australian.
So glad to see the Mundine family standing up for the NO vote this voice will not help indigenous people. Glad to see they don’t want to divide our country with apartheid. Vote NO
VOTE NO!!!
Every Labour leader since Whitlam has pulled this kind of grandstanding when they get into office. They have no interest, nor the ability, to take this country forward FOR EVERYONE HERE.
Bravo Waren Mundine I'm with you.👍👍👍👍👍
Albo and his pals have no interest in fixing something that delivers such regular profits. Just keep blaming and demanding.
Vote NO!!!
How can any Gov of 32% be allowed to throw their muscle around is beyond me -Mr Mundine and Jacinta =❤ spot on
If you're referring to primary vote, the preferential voting system isn't designed to put the most popular in government, it's designed to put the least unpopular in government, and that's not always the same thing.
Well, how much say do you want with only 24%? You want more of a say?
@@xpusostomos Yes but under the mandatory preferential system which applies in Australi's federal elections, we are only really given a choice between two outcomes. That could be changed under our current mandatory preferential voting system if 50.01% in each of a majority of electorates voted for the non-major parties, so it might be argued that, collectively, we get what we desire (i.e. that least unpopular alternative you refer to). But I would argue, the mandatory (and thus essentially undemocratic) nature of our federal election voting unfairly precludes us from reaching that point - which we could more easily under OPTIONAL Preferential voting - of deciding that government alternatives of either Labor or Coalition - are, in fact, both worse than a third minor party alternative. [I would finally argue, that for anyone preferring First Past The Post (not you I assume), optional preferential will preserve a degree of protection against the election of the most unpopular alternative - something which FPTP is prone to delivering].
@@grellis6483 I don't know what you mean that under preferential voting there are only 2 outcomes. That's not the case at all. It's also not the case that anybody needs 50.01% first preference votes to win. You could be the 2nd worst candidate in 1st preferences and win. Imagine Liberal get 30%, Labor 20%, Independ A, 12%, Independ B 15%, Independ C 16%, Independ D 9%. If everyone is preferencing Independ A, then he will pick up Independ D's votes, and pull up to 21% ahead of Labor. Then he's get B's votes and get to 36%. Then he'll get C's votes and get to 52%. The fact that most people put Ind A as 2nd preference means he was the least unpopular and gets over the line. In 1st past the post, the most popular wins, popular meaning gets the most 1st preferences (of course there are no 2nd preferences). Optional preferences don't help you at all, compared to just putting Liberal and Labor last. In optional preferences you don't have to get to 50%, because nobody might. So you just have to keep reallocating until 2 candidates are remaining. If those 2 are Lib and Labor, then you get the same answer. If they are Lib and some independent, you get the same answer. Actually your issue, if you want less major parties is not the preferential system, it's the one-candidate-per-region model, which always results in a 2 party (more or less) state. If you don't want that, you want something like the Hare-Clark voting system (as used in the Australian capital territory) where say 3 or 4 candidates are elected per region, then you'll get 4 or 5 parties having to cooperate for power (for good or bad).
@@xpusostomos I accept the validity of your example - that's how minor parties CAN win but only so long as the major parties don't swap preferences. And unless their combined vote is less than 50% then one of them will win. So a third party must get 50.01% of the primary vote in such a three way contest. (Yes, you are again correct, the 3rd party, could win with less than 50.01% of the primary vote by relying on the preferences of other minor parties. My example was a simplified three party model just to convey the difficulty of winning three cornered contests against the majors where the mandatory requirement to vote for them makes it so difficult to surmount their combined vote. I could have avoided that confusion by not saying 'primary'). We've certainly seen the major parties swap preferences in recent times, and my estimation is that increasingly, as the tide rises against them, they will resort to this to ensure mavericks are excluded. When the mandate is removed, the total number of distributed preferences is lower as many voters will cast fewer or no further preferences. This, in turn, lowers the size of the vote required to defeat a combined major party vote. You obviously understand this from what you have to say about optional preferential. I don't consider what you say is necessarily wrong as the system mostly operates now but for the reasons I've outlined, its not where I see Australian politics going, which is ever greater preference swapping between the majors.
Whatever the various benefits and disbenefits of Hare-Clark etc (I lived in the ACT for decades), optional preferential provides the opportunity to lower the threshold to defeat the entrenched uniparty without the real dangers posed by FPTP. And, as I assume you appreciate, it is also obviously a democratic system as opposed to mandatory preferential voting which is actually quite totalitarian in that it effectively allows the parties to dictate you provide them a preference. Indeed, its as good as them looking over your shoulder! With so much overheated controversy for decades about it being compulsory to turn up to a polling booth to have your name checked off a list - which I consider a perfectly reasonable democratic safeguard of voting system integrity - it amazes me more people don't identify where the really undemocratic compulsion lies.
I am voting NO. Respect for Jacinta Price and Warren Mundine always!! ❤❤
I can see these amazing politicians are under terrible pressure. I just hope they know how much we No voters admire their courage and dignity!
When evil attacks you know you are doing good. Stay strong Warren and Jacinta
Warren is Angry and I'm on his side.
And I am sure he appreciates it.
Angry he’s about to lose his monopoly on Indigenous advisory services
VERY WELL SAID WARREN, HONESTY AND INTEGRITY,.
NOT SOMETHING "ALBO" SEEMS FAMILIAR WITH WHEN IT COMES TO "THE VOICE".
its not just the voice, ALBO has NO HONESTY AND INTEGRITY !!!!!!!! - Australians need to find a way to get rid of this labor Party Government..
@@gregjenkins2925 we need to get rid of both major parties.
@@gregjenkins2925absolutely correct. Thank The ones who voted "Albo" in.
The only positive thing to come out of the Voice nonsense.
Is that Australia and Australians can now see who genuinely cares about our country, and who’s taking advantage of Australians' better natures.
🥰Thank you Jacinta and Warren you are true Australians supporting all Australians no matter what their heritage.
Bring Australia together. Australia is for all Australians equally, with objectivity, fairness, impartiality, and even-handedness.❤🇦🇺🦘
I replayed this 4 times…….
Exactly.
Well said Warren.
Well Said Mr. Mundine 👏👏👏 🥰 VOTE "NO"
Warren 'My Man' Spoken with true emotion, not the confected emotion that is one of the Albanese weapons.
Proud of you Mr Mundine. Hold your head high. We are behind you and support you. Your not alone.
Warren Mundine For Prime Minister of Australia!! Best Speach ive Ever Heard in Australian Politics All My Life!! ❤️❤️❤️🙏❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
I'm a 100% supporter of Warren Mundine.
The passion from this bloke is a very powerful thing to see. This man believes in what he's talking about! And, he's also spot on!
I've seen a single person on the Yes side of this vote with the same passion, and if they exist it's for personal gain.
Mundine and Price are a total contrast to Burnie and Mao.
Thank you Warren for standing up, sorry for the abuse you have copped. Write NO
Well Presented Warren U I'm Totally Proud to call You & Jacinta MY Brother & Sister And Friends ..
God Keep you Safe .🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
Bless Your Soul Warren !! Stay Strong we Need A Voice like you against All Narcissistic Leaders Thats The Voice Thats Needed Rout out these Evil Leaders and Unite Australians Warren Regardless of Creed or Race❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
What an incredible speech
Well said, Warren.
Vote NO.
Warren Mundine thank you for speaking bthe truth
Good on you for standing up for Equity, Warren. Go on, CRUSH the division.
Anybody who is not moved by Warren’s plea/speech has a heart of stone. What a great man.
Spot on Warren,You are a legend and no one could have said that better. Your speech made me tear up, a very meaningful speech. I came to Australia 54 yrs ago, l am forever grateful and love this country to bits. NO DIVISION PLS, AND ITS A GIANT "NO" FOR ME.
VOTE 1 Mundine!
Warren Mundine - what a fantastic Australian champion!!! God bless you sir!!!
I'm with you, Warren I'm voting NO. Straight up.
This is the best thing I’ve heard in Australia in ages*****❤❤❤❤❤❤
There is so much passion Warren and Jacinta Proud to support what is the truth. Albo a Big fat NO
Warren you are a true Aussie bloke and Jacinta you are an amazing woman. Take care as you battle this yes campaign that will divide us.
We stand with you. Vote No and we hope the ,"ears" will listen and help your people in remote communities in the future. It's insane the amount of $ the yes group have to spend.
Good on you Warren god bless.
Prime Minister Mr. Albanese now pleads “Don’t close the door”.
But Mr. Albanese. Hang on Mate!
The wording of the referendum proposition already leaves the “door open” for the voice body to change its function and purpose from the very minute the referendum passes or at anytime in the future.
Mr. Albanese touts “advisory body” or now touts a “structured advisory body” or an “advisory committee”.
But the wording in the referendum proposition clearly states “a body” only.
The legal definition of an “advisory body” and “a body” have different legal meaning and interpretation.
A simple parliamentary consent given by any elected government who commands or can command a majority vote in the parliament can grant the voice body a new power or powers overnight to change the function and purpose of the voice body.
This is the trick in the trap as the proposition door has been deliberately LEFT OPEN for such a purpose.
This means that the proposition wording has the potential to send Australia down a similar roadway that New Zealand has already travelled only to find out later too late to return Australia.
Pull back the curtains and blow away the smoke and WRITE “NO”.
🇦🇺💯%
thank mate
Well said, my brother!, ✊️
Also, Thank you Mr Mundine - you give 'no' voters courage 👍🙏🏽
Power to you brother… well done you are a very courageous man !!!
I met Warren some years ago. A good bloke. I voted for him previously and would do so again in a heartbeat.
Bless you Warren.
Australia is a better place for having you.
Amen to that
Well said! Vote No Australia
Well said. HOPEFULLY, your real voice is heard.
So true Waren!
Definitely; attacking others does not help. They would be calling Warren & Jacinta racists if they were not indigenous people. Its NO from me in WA
You are telling the truth
God bless Warren, and Australia
If you don't know...vote NO!
Warren Mundine the next Governor General of Australia - this man is courages and loves Australia and all Australians.
Keep going Warren. Stand tall and strong. This Government is WEF WHO UN backed and this gov is not in the least in the welfare of Aboriginal people.Moreover the Communist party in Australia are deeply involved in the voice. And Albo as connections to the Communist Party of Australia
God bless Warren Mundine !! A true Aussie Patriot !!! 🦁 🔥
Much respect to Warren Mundine, Anthony Mundine & Jacinta Price
Praise the lord ❤️ 🙌 🙏 this is truth and truth will set everyone free
Yes Warren, brilliant speech. Treat everyone equal!!!! Don't divide us.❤
Good comment Warren
He is Martin Luther King of Australia
Well said Mate!!!!
Vote No. If Albo goes to France for Rugby World Cup dont come back; beautiful speech, Warren.
Good on ya mate
Stange how there are so many country men/and women in PARLIMENT WITH A VOICE already ///
Another country man here speaking the truth
There is a leader. Genuine focus on the people and rallying everyone to strive for a common purpose, not glory for themselves.
Well said, any sensible Australian would be with you in voting No