I love when people argue different laws of physics, thermodynamics, entropy, motion, atmospherics and one by one get every single thing about it wrong.
I don't love it. The level of stupidity exhibited by idiots like "Nathan" is indicative of the dumbing down of people in general. God only knows what they are being taught in school.
I have wondered for years now why it is that some people really want the moon landings to be fake. It must be that in some strange way, human progress and achievement truly frightens them. Thanks again, Dan.
it's not that it frightens them, it's like every. single. other. conspiracy. they feel special like they're the ones on the inside of some super secret information, its another kind of dumb arrogance it's all it is
Yeah they are just people who desperately need to be the smartest in the room, but the world stopped letting them in, so they created their own society where they can all be the smartest in the room without ever being challenged lol.
In reality, he's saying 'I'm unemployable, so I'll make up a load of rubbish, pretend it's reality and get a load of gullible fools to pay me to say it.'
It's like he picked up the middle school textbook on gases, read the part in chapter one about how a gas expands to fill its container, then got confused and bored and stopped reading before the part in chapter four where they explain how gas behaves in a gravitational field.
@@russlehman2070 If you start from a position where you don't accept that gravity is real, and has predictable effects, then it becomes impossible to accept that there can be a pressure gradient without a container. Just like if you don't believe that space exists, and that NASA is evil and lies all the time, you can't accept any footage from space. Poor dumb bastards.
OMG... This must be the millionth time I've heard that "without a container" argument. No matter how often their arguments are debunked, they just keep using them over and over again. I honestly admire your patience in dealing with these people.
Thanks again. Listening to Mr Oakley is a weird experience- it’s discombobulating hearing someone sooo angry, sooo certain, soooo arrogant and soooo stupid all at once. It’s a lot. Definitely someone who I suspect would be perpetually lonely, defensive and unhappy .
Yes, so the question is does the anger come from people not accepting his "science" or from his loss of friends? Which came first, the chicken or the globe, I mean egg?
I love how Oakley consistently forgets that surveyors exist. All those independent measurements, done over and over ad nauseum, give us a very detailed way to know the radius of the Earth.
I have no doubt that if you handed any of these flerfs and space deniers a tape measure, and asked them to tell you he area of the room they are currently occuyping, in square meters or square feet, that they would have no idea how to accomplish it.
@cdcharacter5689 he's definitely not, just like Mark Sargent. They've both, and likely many more, gone full grifter. They got a taste of popularity, a bit of fame, maybe some money, more supporters and friends than ever in their lives. They talk about "scientists" or "teachers" having a vested interest in perpetuating a lie in order to keep their jobs, but for Oakley he would not only lose any income but also he'd lose all his friends, his whole life is flat earth. Scientists and teachers can just move on to the new science. Teachers are paid to teach whatever the current facts are, if the facts change, they can just teach the new facts, they aren't tied to a specific set of facts so long as they are true.
He's like many others he's *NOT* trying to convince anyone. He's trolling for gullible people to give him money. An awful lot of the people SciMan debunks are actually just cheap snake oil salesmen trying to make money.
Nathan is clearly the type of person who was insecure about himself growing up felt he had no power over anything. Flat and the internet clearly gives him the feeling he so desperately needs in life of being in control of something.
Nathan is the perfect definition of Dunning Kruger. It stuns me that anyone sits and listens to him ramble over and over on the same thing for so long. As you say, he loves the sound of his own voice so much he just repeats the same thing over and over and over.
_"Nathan is the perfect definition of Dunning Kruger."_ Not really. He's a perfect example of how easy it is to take people for a ride these days. If I say I have a masters degree in biology, I immediately encounter resistance and claims that I'm lying. But if I say the earth is flat, immediately everyone believes me and starts to frantically explain how I'm wrong. You have to appreciate the irony here.
@@corleth2868 I suspect his mother did not love *HIM*. He certainly lacks any real self esteem, or he would not be so afraid of being mistaken. That is classic evidence of neglect or emotional abuse. Those of us with loving, supportive parents are usually nowhere nearly so insecure. I would feel sorry for him if he were not such a jerk.
Nathan Oakley is 100% a danger to himself and others, he gets so insanely worked up over this topic unlike any flat earther I've seen. Someone get him in front of a doctor
Did you every see him in a debate with Bob the Science Guy? Bob was so calm and relaxed, and failed to be baited and rise to Nathan's lies and stupidity, so Nathan was reduced to a spluttering, aggressive incoherent rage. The anger was palpable, and it didn't seen healthy or normal, and I found it was rather frightening. If he was an American, I'd fear he shoot up a school!
You should've seen the email rant he had with a RUclips creator, when he decided to have a debate and found out his opponent was Conspiracy Catz. 😂 He gets worked up when people don't fall for his argument tactics.
The fabulous thing about people like Nathan is the more they talk, the more obvious it becomes that they're clueless. Or crazy. Or both. Take your pick.
With every flat earth thing i've heard they come up with some explanation for individual phenomena, which *COULD* make sense, IF you ignore all the other things that explanation ignores. I.e. they can't come up with a model that fits ALL the phenomena we see at the same time. In fact, i've seen them come up with 2 explanations that "explain" one thing each but totally contradict each other ... in the same sentence.
I suppose a sufficiently bored mathematician / physicist could come up with some flat Earth equations. Kind of like formulas for the solar system assuming an Earth centered rather than Heliocentric solar system. It'd be hella ugly! Or maybe the flat Earthers could do that since it's their idea. Trolls!
@@davidg4288 equations do not equal reality, moron. Just because they invented a language and are using this language to show how their theoretical nonsense "works" does not mean it represents reality... evrything begins and ends with assumptions in the heliocentric model....
@@davidg4288 I saw a thing with Dr. Bob of Bob the Science Guy/ResearchFlatMoon, and Culture Catz, on the latter's channel, IIRC. Dr. Bob showed a perfect mathematical model for flat-earth. 😉 Except... it was a sphere. 😄🤣😄
@@Armis71 There must be a hole in the dome there. Or he might claim buoyancy of course which means we can just pump argon from the top and make some profit.
He is like that little kid who learns a new phrase and uses it ad nauseam. I think he needs medication, therapy, or at the very least, a hug. Keep up the great work Dan.
The biggest problem is that they never will understand that vacuum doesn't suck. It is gravity induced pressure that pushes...The air particles at the top of the atmosphere are gently resting on top a soft bed made out of their pressured brothers.
TRUE, if gravity suddenly stopped and the earth was left crumbling, the atmosphere wouldnt shoot out and spread across the universe to fill the void, it would slowly dissipate based on interactions with the matter around it. they always seem to think vacuums are these monstrous forces, throwing around the evil sounding numbers 10 to the negative however many not even stopping to realise that that is a tiny number, and the vacuum is the absence of matter, ergo energy
So they believe density makes thinks fall to the floor but the atmosphere, which has density, should fly off into a less dense environment? Interesting
While singularly being unable to explain why something falls "down" (towards the centre of mass of the Earth) and not some other random direction due to their buoyancy theory.
Take half of the world's flerfing idiots and offer them the chance to perform an experiment that will 100% confirm if the Earth is flat and space is fake. Have them sign a waiver that they alone are solely responsible for the consequences of their actions with no possibility for their heirs / next-of-kin to sue as a result of the experiment. Live stream the entire process from start to finish on any and all platforms they choose. Allow them to have as many other flerfing idiots watch the process with absolutely no interference from any government agency. Send those who have agreed to the ISS. Put them in an airlock without spacesuits and give them the opportunity to go EV in shorts and a t-shirt. See how many of them suddenly decide space is, in fact, very, _VERY_ real.
He would probably claim to have been tranquilized on the way to the rocket and brought into some swimming pool with LCD Displays as spacecraft "windows".
Nice to see that there's some continuity in this crazy world of ours: The Sun continues to rise and set every day; Canadian winters are still cold; N.O. is still a top-drawer bull$hit merchant.... (Edit: Sorry, Dan; I simply couldn't make it to the end of this video - the urge to rearrange N.O.'s dental work by force was simply too strong in me.)
Yes, I had to take a deep breath or three also. I imagine having a "discussion" with this guy in a pub could turn real nasty, real quick! I did make it to video's end, though 😄
@@rexharrison6827 - My hunch is that he would be far less confrontational (and, quite frankly, a far less offensive human being) in-person, where he would be without the protection of both the internet and his mute button.
I worked at Digital Domain in 1996, not long after they were nominated for, but ultimately lost the visual effects Oscar for Apollo 13 to Babe. It was thought within the company that they may have lost because people didn't realize the amount of visual effects that were in the movie - they used no archival footage of the launch in the film. So let's set 1995 as the year where you could fool the public with convincing CG for space stuff. And this is from a top notch visual effects company using cutting edge and extremely expensive computers and software - tens of thousands of dollars with a limited set of people that knew how to use them. I'd really like to hear an explanation from any of these people of how you could create a convincing fake before that time, much less 27 years before then.
I find comfort in the guaranteed posting you do on Tuesday and Friday sciman. I always watch them before heading to work because they are on my notifications really early here on the east coast of the United states.
I love these arguments of "The globe earth model falls apart if we ignore gravity" like wow crazy! Kinda like how no matter how sturdy a building is, it'll fall apart if we remove the foundation. Maybe we should all start believing in flat houses?
Nathan repeatedly demonstrates that he knows that the Earth is not Flat. He deliberately chooses what evidence to ignore or misrepresent, and what logical fallacy to apply, in order to avoid the conclusion. Further, he deliberately bullies people.
@@antondovydaitis2261 he was so infamous amongst FE debunkers that when he actually deigned to reply to my comment on one of his videos, I took it as a badge of honour to be bullied by this great FE celebrity I had heard so much about!
Every time I hear these people talk about the "INCREDIBLY POWERFUL PERFECT VACUUM", I think back to Futurama. "How many atmospheres can the ship withstand, Professor?" "Well it's a Spaceship, so I would guess anywhere between zero, and one." Sure, the gas pressure at sea level is relatively strong (again, compared to: zero) under kilometres of atmosphere, but that's a smaller jump from 0 to sea level than it is going from the surface of water to a single metre underneath. Vacuum doesn't have "strength", it's a simple lack of atmosphere, so its relative "strength" only exists in COMPARISON to the pressure around it. Think about it. Is a vacuum at sea level any stronger or more powerful than a vacuum under 10 metres of water? No, of course not, it's a vacuum, it stays the same regardless of outside pressures, and as we get further from sea level what do we get? Less and less pressure, at the absolute limits of our atmosphere the pressure is very very nearly zero, and the vacuum beyond that point? Only a tiny, tiny, tiny bit lower.
The problem for those idiots is that they calculate with percent instead of straight numbers. And with percent of course a vacuum is indefinitely stronger. 1 atmosphere is infinite percent more than 0. But what those idiots do not think about is that for example a standard scuba tank has 200 atmospheres of pressure, making it 200 times more difference than between the atmosphere and a vacuum. But they of course do not want to understand that, because it would blow their believes out of the sky.....
As a young kid, it astounded me that the space shuttle had the landing gear open to the void of space. I thought 'woah, they must be extra strong to not to explode on the vacuum'. Then one day someone told me they were normal airplane tires, just filed with nitrogen. There's no need for anything special, the difference between land and void of space is exactly 1atm, which any tire can withstand, even a car one.
With your Futurama reference, asking how many atmospheres a spaceship can withstand is relevant if it's required to land on a planet with a higher atmospheric pressure than Earth. Usually, a spaceship will have a lower than sea level air pressure anyway and for the exact same reasons as a jet airliner - it's easier to maintain and the vessel is easier and lighter to build.
@@chrisantoniou4366 in the context of the episode they are sinking deep into the ocean, the line before the ones I quoted was "My god, that's over 1000 atmospheres of pressure!" You're absolutely correct though :D
I haven't tuned into the channel for quite a while but coming back to the news that Oakley has all but fallen off the RUclips space is beautiful music to my ears! God may not be real but miracles sure are!
I figured it all out, this is all a ploy to make people money. Dan and the flattys are in on this as they require each other. So they go back and forward making videos to gain views and money, then they split it all 50-50. So obvious captain obvious.
That funny because I'm currently watching the Apollo 17 mission for it 50 years, and the quantity of pictures and films we have on this mission alone is amazing. But those people always do as if we got just a handful of pictures and few minutes of film from Apollo 11 and nothing else.
They grasp at straws and ignore all else Some of the data and some of the imagery from Apollo 11 was garbled due to issues with Australia All the data from the other 6 landings is available, along with all the data from Apollo 8, 10, and 13 that circled the moon. That little bit is ignored by the nutters
@@Hellndegenerates You can pretend they don't exist all you want, you can even pretend they are fake. Your personnal incredulity is all yours, but is not and will never be a proof of anything. ;)
@@Hellndegenerates If you knew anything about rocket-science and space-engineering you could open your mouth and talk with us. If you think the moon landing is fake, you're probably just as fucking dumb as Nathanael.
@@Hellndegenerates Buy KSP on steam market. Do everything just like in the apollo missions and voila, you're on the moon. It's a joke that you dumnfuck are even allowed to access the internet. the whole swiss population laughs at you fucking degen morons suffering dunning-kruger effect. Vistit me at ETH at my courses in science. You fucking worthless tinfoil dipshit american. USA is a joke. apart from cali and some in NY you're the least educated country on earth. L
You don't even need to believe in gravity to prove Nathan wrong. Throw a ball into the air. What happens? It falls down. If you can accept that a ball thrown upwards will fall back down (regardless of why), then you disprove Nathan. Airbus made of molecules, which act like balls. They will have some velocity upward, and like that ball, will fall down. The faster a ball is travelling, the higher it goes, and you can calculate the height the ball will travel upwards based on its speed. It isn't based on the mass of the ball (you can try it with different mass balls travelling at the same speed and they will go up the same height). So the height of the air molecules will have a maximum height they can travel, which is entirely dependant on their speed. This means that so long as you can accept that "what goes up must come down", then there can be a region where air molecules can't get to because they haven't got the speed neccsary. This doesn't require someone to believe in gravity, it just requires them to see what happens when they throw a ball. They can see this with their own eyes, and can be done with objects that they have around their house. Even children know that when you throw a ball up, it comes back down. But it seems that Nathan doesn't even know that 🙄
This is true. Nathan's show in a total con job. He knows fully well that the Earth is spherical. On his shows he even has pictures of wind farm over the ocean that clearly disappear over the curve while he spouts the FE BS. He makes money off the true believers.
They will keep claiming it’s fake. You could send some of these con artists to space and they would still yell about CGI. It’s actually pretty pathetic.
@@mjjoe76 The good thing about sending these con artists into space is that they don't believe in neither gravity nor vacuum we don't need to worry about space suits or return vehicles for them. The average IQ of humanity will take a noticeable step up.
@@mjjoe76 The root problem with them is, they're religious extremists. They can't accept facts because they conflict with their views of reality. They literally believe in an upturned soup bowl smacked on top of a pizza, just because some book says so. Flat earthers can never be eradicated unless we eradicate Christianity first.
I can't wait till Artemis leaves a video camera on the moon so flerfers can watch the earth in real time! Will be hilarious. Nathan can watch himself wave at the moon (a few seconds after)!
Every time I'm feeling down, I watch a Sciman Dan video and take comfort in the fact that at least I have a better grasp of science than the Fleecers in the videos
6th law of thermodynamics: Conspiracy theorists incorrectly using the 2nd law will be swept into the abyss by the winds being compressed and sped up in their home solely because of how mentally inept they are.
I love watching this stuff as I'm full swing in the middle my mechanical engineering degree. All these big words and laws they throw out without understanding just how complicated thermodynamics can really be. That's a nightmare of a class.
What’s really funny about Oakley is that he gets so angry about people who fail to understand his gross misconceptions. He really needs to worry about his blood pressure rather than get angry about the science he doesn’t understand. But he certainly provides excellent entertainment.
If flat earth's air pressure is maintained by being in a closed container, why does it get less the higher you go? Shouldn't it be at the same pressure regardless of altitude?
I've heard their answer to that, they say it's because trees release oxygen down near ground level which causes the pressure to be higher there.. somehow
And the weirder part is that INSIDE A CLOSED CONTAINER… guess what. There’s a TINY, though measurable PRESSURE GRADIENT within gasses. It is NOT completely uniform. So even in their precious container, they have a gradient they can’t explain. Shocking.
It keeps coming back to the good old adage, "Vacuums don't suck." Space is not akin to a vacuum cleaner that's holding a hose to our planet and trying to pull our atmosphere away.
How does he explain Saturn, Jupiter and Uranus? I love how flat earthers pick and choose which science term they except and reject. Gravity doesn't exist but buoyancy does, ridiculous.
So Nathan was once a flying salesman...interesting. It amazes me to no end how people like Nathan can go on and on, and never stop to listen to themselves. Clearly, Nathan is still a 'flyin' salesman'.
Nathan"child-slapper" Oakley claims (I don't know why we should believe it. I'd like to see proof.) that he was a flying salesman. I think he just wants people to know that he actually had a job once.
Actually, he was briefly a salesman for expensive (snake oil) hi-fi. He once appeared on The Gadget Show in the UK - hence him calling himself “Nathan Gadget Oakley” prior to his Flat Earth rebirth. Unfortunately his anger issues made him unemployable.
The 2nd law - the entropy will increase over time in a closed system. That bit you missed out is the critical part. The only truly closed system in the universe - is the universe.
Nice channel, Dan. I just discovered it. Now that the first Artemis mission is completed, have you seen anyone calling that fake? I do recall one guy turning up the contrast on the orbital footage and claiming the blocky border between objects and space was proof of fakery.
I just watched a video from planarwalk, someone who debunks flat earthers like sci man dan, debunking someone who called Artemis fake, because "it has no steering wheel" No joke, some people are that dumb.
I was living on a hill station for 7 years. Water boils at 97 to 98 degrees up there. Not just one thermometer but many doing it over and over again. To explain less pressure to push against compared to sea level. Also the water has impurities so that is why there is a range.
We live above 450 metres and it's the same here. Also there is less heat in the air because there is less air. This is also the reason barometerswork and why climbers of Mt Everest need oxygen and jet airliners need to be pressurized. All acknowledged facts that Oakley can't explain.
Except that it is incorrect, unfortunately. In general, a process shifting towards equilibrium does not involve an increase in Entropy, and in particular, a cup of hot coffee cooling exhibits a reduction in Entropy, not an increase. For most processes, an increase in Entropy involves a temperature rise. For a single state system, the differential of Entropy is equal to the heat multiplied by the differential in Temperature.
I watched the lunar landing back in 1969. It was the middle of the night, like 2:30-3 Eastern. My parents woke me up to watch it. The stations would have already signed off (Yes, kids. The stations all shut down every night by playing the Star Spangled Banner to a flag waving clip, and didn't play 24/7/366), but they were broadcasting this night. Back then, the space program was significant in school curricula. Had it been all show, it would have been in prime time, I feel like. Alaska had never had live news content before that night, and they put up TV screens in Central Park. That's a shite-ton of coordination for a hoax.
The _really_ impressive part of the hoax was how they convinced the various militaries and space agencies of all the other countries in the world, a number of whom _really_ didn't like the US, and all of whom were tracking the launch and landing etc themselves. Tricking all of them... I mean that has to be some _magic_ powers.
My grandmother (born 1906) loved tech stuff. She told me about how she felt, being a child and seeing the first car arrive in her town, and the being an elderly lady, sitting in her living room, watching the Moon landing on television as it happened. What an amazing century the 20th was!
I've been watching your videos for well over two years now Dan (including RunManDan as it happens) and I can't help thinking that I should have got tired of you making conspiracy theorists look even more ignorant and foolish than they transparently are, but I continue to be enthralled. Keep up the good work!
The live televisionbroadcast of the moon landings would have been impossible to fake with the technology that existed at the time. There was simply no way to produce slow motion beyond a few seconds.
Half of the US population proves the point. I don't think there is another country with as much dense poeple anywhere else. The republican party, full of pseudo scientists, religious brainwashed morons, racist psychopaths, gun loving and miniscule intelligent idiots. MERICAA
ohh no. You went from Established titles scam to Raid Shadow Legends scam. Anyone who has played that game knows it is so boring that it plays itself and unless you spend a fortune on microtransactions. You can only get so far in the game before you hit a brick wall
Don't flat earthers say there's a dome over their flat earth (I can only assume it's a see through) then why doesn't the atmosphere reach the dome? and what's underneath the flat earth, rock? is that flat as well? Nathan if the earth does have a dome over it then there will be oxygen to breath so why not go in a hot air balloon with out an oxygen mask see how long you last as you go higher and higher, Dan can we crowed fund a trip to the moon for Nathan and leave him there
Additionally, Oakley's claim debunks the flat earth too. The entropy of an isolated system never decreases; which means that for a system in equilibrium, the entropy stays the same; otherwise, the entropy increases until equilibrium is reached. Oakley's problem is that the pressure gradient of the atmosphere is constant. So much so that meteorologists and geophysicists refer to altitude in terms of pressure. Yes, they talk about altitude in the atmosphere in terms of pascals and NOT meters. IOW, under Oakley's interpretation, a pressure constant gradient must tend toward equilibrium or it would be a violation of "natural law".
@Mickey Filmer Oh, he tends to accuse the questioner of bringing in irrelevant details to deflect from the main issue and of ignoring the "fact" that you need to have a container to have a pressure to have the gradient in in the first place.
@@swinde TOTALLY FALSE! To get that you'd need a container that shielded the contents from the effects of gravity. Consider a container with holes at different heights and filled with water, the water will be ejected more forcefully from the lower holes. (If you are a flerf who believes in a firmament you are disproved by the atmospheric pressure gradient. And you are disagreeing with Nathan Oakly and other flerfs.)
@@swinde If you meant to say "With a _sealed_ container there is no pressure gradient" I have a proposal for a clean energy source: We run a sealed pipeline with wind turbines inside up a mountain, if we close a valve to the outside the air inside should rush up the pipe to even out the pressure, when we open the valve the air inside should rush down the pipe to reform the pressure gradient, generating power both ways, _right?_
@@Hexalobular ...but Oakley is taking about a sealed container. If it wasn't sealed he wouldn't be going on about it preventing the atmosphere from being sucked into space, therefore @Swinde was correct in assuming a sealed container.
They don’t understand that nothing we observe on earth translates to a flat snow globe earth. Once your model requires literally all of established science to be rewritten, it should probably clue you in that your model is flawed. I honestly don’t think most of these guys believe the earth is flat.
Oakley is a strange character - dedicating most of his days to producing videos that then have about 500 views each. I'd go as far to say that, given his audience (such that it is) is probably the same people every day, he's probably totally harmless these days. I'm sure that winds him up more than anything :-)
I enjoy starting my week with Flat Earth Friday and ending it with Tinfoil Tuesdays. Your content makes excellent bookends to the work week. Thanks Dan!
100% they didn't, Nothing any flattard can say will change that. (Edit) oh ffs it Nathan slappy dude Oakley, The lying coward who can't convert kilometres to meters.
I like it when this channel focuses on those who deny the proven rather than those who assert the unproven. That's why I usually like flat earth Fridays more than TFT. Having a laugh at someone who believes in Santa Claus, for example, wouldn't really hold my interest. So this is a good one
The entropy of a cup of coffee actually decreases as the cools, because the particles jiggle around less as they lose energy so become less disordered. But the heat radiates to the air around it and the increase in entropy there compensates, and entropy is increased overall
@@Kualinar if you need someone who denies basic physics and is worse than Jokely, you'd have to choose Santos the Despicable (well, not quite his real name, but more accurate).
@@MaryAnnNytowl I agree. Stupidity is fine but that Santos is worse..DAMMIT, you're right. So transparent when he's wrong, he must resort to anger and petty name calling... what a guru!
Install Raid for Free ✅ IOS/ANDROID/PC: clcr.me/SciManDan_Dec22 and get a special starter pack 💥 Available only for the next 30 days
No thanks. I'm good. I've been good since day 1 of the RSL spam.
Nope
2:12
Anyone else literally groan out loud at this?
Looks like a sexy game, i hope it can run on my sexy Nokia 8110
I love when people argue different laws of physics, thermodynamics, entropy, motion, atmospherics and one by one get every single thing about it wrong.
yeah and they pick and choose which ones to believe
They're flat earthers, they literally don't understand the concept of "down"
Denying science by falsely quoting science is rather strange.
If gravity is real then why can I drive in reverse? Check mate Danny Boi
I don't love it. The level of stupidity exhibited by idiots like "Nathan" is indicative of the dumbing down of people in general. God only knows what they are being taught in school.
Poor Nathan, demoted from Flat Earth Friday to Tinfoil Tuesday.....🤣
Well, it is still fun to poke at him.
It's amazing how Nathan can spend an hour and a half saying absolutely nothing.
Just like my ex-wife
I'd say he'd make a good politician with a talent like that, but we have far too many idiot politicians as it is.
My Mrs can say fuck all in an HR and half Nd her lips move non stop Nathan reminds me of her except my Mrs usually wins
It's amazing how he uses so many words...... just to say nothing.
its a skill
I have wondered for years now why it is that some people really want the moon landings to be fake. It must be that in some strange way, human progress and achievement truly frightens them. Thanks again, Dan.
If the moon landing is real, it disproves the impenetrable "firmament" avove the flat earth, so, no moon landings.
it's not that it frightens them, it's like every. single. other. conspiracy.
they feel special like they're the ones on the inside of some super secret information, its another kind of dumb arrogance
it's all it is
Well pizza earth cult can't have moon landings be real, The others are just anti science trolls.
Yeah they are just people who desperately need to be the smartest in the room, but the world stopped letting them in, so they created their own society where they can all be the smartest in the room without ever being challenged lol.
@@Sem5626 Well said. 👍
Nathan has a rather long winded way of saying, "I don't understand basic physics".
Actually, it's «I don't understand reality».
In reality, he's saying 'I'm unemployable, so I'll make up a load of rubbish, pretend it's reality and get a load of gullible fools to pay me to say it.'
It's like he picked up the middle school textbook on gases, read the part in chapter one about how a gas expands to fill its container, then got confused and bored and stopped reading before the part in chapter four where they explain how gas behaves in a gravitational field.
Basic physics level_____
@@russlehman2070 If you start from a position where you don't accept that gravity is real, and has predictable effects, then it becomes impossible to accept that there can be a pressure gradient without a container. Just like if you don't believe that space exists, and that NASA is evil and lies all the time, you can't accept any footage from space. Poor dumb bastards.
OMG... This must be the millionth time I've heard that "without a container" argument. No matter how often their arguments are debunked, they just keep using them over and over again.
I honestly admire your patience in dealing with these people.
Is he referring to "sky vacuum" to separate it from his "brain vacuum"?
Brain vacuum known as fool's brain and it's nothing there inside, just nonsense.
Sky vacuum is needed to keep brain vacuum in the cranium. Outside pressure, you see...
If vacumes have brains then why does gravity not go into a vacuumed
Like Cypress Hill? "Insane In The Brain"?
@@jansennhenn579 "Grazy insane, got no brain."
Thanks again. Listening to Mr Oakley is a weird experience- it’s discombobulating hearing someone sooo angry, sooo certain, soooo arrogant and soooo stupid all at once. It’s a lot. Definitely someone who I suspect would be perpetually lonely, defensive and unhappy .
Probably why he hits toddlers.
Yes, so the question is does the anger come from people not accepting his "science" or from his loss of friends? Which came first, the chicken or the globe, I mean egg?
It’s so bad, I really can’t handle listening to him anymore; makes me cringe too much.
You forgot obnoxious.
That's exactly what my brother is like. He used to call me just to yell at me about things he does understand.
I love how Oakley consistently forgets that surveyors exist. All those independent measurements, done over and over ad nauseum, give us a very detailed way to know the radius of the Earth.
I have no doubt that if you handed any of these flerfs and space deniers a tape measure, and asked them to tell you he area of the room they are currently occuyping, in square meters or square feet, that they would have no idea how to accomplish it.
It must be terribly frustrating for Nathan to have all that knowledge and not be able to convince others of his genius.
Or earn hood money from it - instead going round begging for cash off his depleted minions
Sometimes, it sounds like he's not even convinced himself !
@cdcharacter5689 he's definitely not, just like Mark Sargent. They've both, and likely many more, gone full grifter. They got a taste of popularity, a bit of fame, maybe some money, more supporters and friends than ever in their lives. They talk about "scientists" or "teachers" having a vested interest in perpetuating a lie in order to keep their jobs, but for Oakley he would not only lose any income but also he'd lose all his friends, his whole life is flat earth. Scientists and teachers can just move on to the new science. Teachers are paid to teach whatever the current facts are, if the facts change, they can just teach the new facts, they aren't tied to a specific set of facts so long as they are true.
Nathan is to science what DarkSydePhil is to gaming
He's like many others he's *NOT* trying to convince anyone. He's trolling for gullible people to give him money.
An awful lot of the people SciMan debunks are actually just cheap snake oil salesmen trying to make money.
Nathan Joakley a legend in his own lunchtime , a lunchtime spent in his own echo chamber. Thanks Dan and keep up the good work.
A legend in his own mind.
@@chrisantoniou4366 I thought of that but am reluctant to admit he possesses any kind of mind.
@@joseraulcapablanca8564 Fair point... 😆
@@joseraulcapablanca8564 well played, well played. 👏
Nathan is clearly the type of person who was insecure about himself growing up felt he had no power over anything. Flat and the internet clearly gives him the feeling he so desperately needs in life of being in control of something.
That or it's making him money, because dumbasses have money to spend too.
Nathan is the perfect definition of Dunning Kruger.
It stuns me that anyone sits and listens to him ramble over and over on the same thing for so long. As you say, he loves the sound of his own voice so much he just repeats the same thing over and over and over.
_"Nathan is the perfect definition of Dunning Kruger."_
Not really. He's a perfect example of how easy it is to take people for a ride these days. If I say I have a masters degree in biology, I immediately encounter resistance and claims that I'm lying. But if I say the earth is flat, immediately everyone believes me and starts to frantically explain how I'm wrong. You have to appreciate the irony here.
I can't stand his voice, he could be talking about anything and that wouldn't change.
I'd be amazed if even his mother loved his voice.
@@corleth2868 I suspect his mother did not love *HIM*. He certainly lacks any real self esteem, or he would not be so afraid of being mistaken. That is classic evidence of neglect or emotional abuse. Those of us with loving, supportive parents are usually nowhere nearly so insecure. I would feel sorry for him if he were not such a jerk.
Nathan Oakley is 100% a danger to himself and others, he gets so insanely worked up over this topic unlike any flat earther I've seen. Someone get him in front of a doctor
Satan Santos is close second.
Did you every see him in a debate with Bob the Science Guy? Bob was so calm and relaxed, and failed to be baited and rise to Nathan's lies and stupidity, so Nathan was reduced to a spluttering, aggressive incoherent rage. The anger was palpable, and it didn't seen healthy or normal, and I found it was rather frightening. If he was an American, I'd fear he shoot up a school!
You should've seen the email rant he had with a RUclips creator, when he decided to have a debate and found out his opponent was Conspiracy Catz. 😂 He gets worked up when people don't fall for his argument tactics.
Sending someone to the doctor who doesn't want help doesn't help.
If gravity is real then why can I drive in reverse? Check mate Danny Boi
The fabulous thing about people like Nathan is the more they talk, the more obvious it becomes that they're clueless. Or crazy. Or both. Take your pick.
With every flat earth thing i've heard they come up with some explanation for individual phenomena, which *COULD* make sense, IF you ignore all the other things that explanation ignores. I.e. they can't come up with a model that fits ALL the phenomena we see at the same time. In fact, i've seen them come up with 2 explanations that "explain" one thing each but totally contradict each other ... in the same sentence.
If gravity is real then why can I drive in reverse? Check mate Danny Boi
I suppose a sufficiently bored mathematician / physicist could come up with some flat Earth equations. Kind of like formulas for the solar system assuming an Earth centered rather than Heliocentric solar system. It'd be hella ugly! Or maybe the flat Earthers could do that since it's their idea. Trolls!
@@davidg4288 equations do not equal reality, moron. Just because they invented a language and are using this language to show how their theoretical nonsense "works" does not mean it represents reality... evrything begins and ends with assumptions in the heliocentric model....
@@davidg4288 I saw a thing with Dr. Bob of Bob the Science Guy/ResearchFlatMoon, and Culture Catz, on the latter's channel, IIRC. Dr. Bob showed a perfect mathematical model for flat-earth. 😉 Except... it was a sphere. 😄🤣😄
@@MaryAnnNytowl Wrap your flat map around a sphere and join it along the edges? I'll have to look that up!
How does Nathan explain thin air or having to use oxigen on Everest. I'm still baffled.
There's a big giant vacuum near Everest that sucks all the oxygen out. :P
Trees release oxygen down near ground level and that why there's more pressure at the ground.. somehow
@@Armis71 There must be a hole in the dome there. Or he might claim buoyancy of course which means we can just pump argon from the top and make some profit.
From the top of Everest, Nathan can view his entire domain. Just a shame he cant see the whole of Flat Earth from up there
Simple, no brain, no need for oxygen...
He is like that little kid who learns a new phrase and uses it ad nauseam.
I think he needs medication, therapy, or at the very least, a hug.
Keep up the great work Dan.
Or a punch in the face or two.
The biggest problem is that they never will understand that vacuum doesn't suck. It is gravity induced pressure that pushes...The air particles at the top of the atmosphere are gently resting on top a soft bed made out of their pressured brothers.
The only thing that sucks is their lack of understanding....
My biggest problem is If gravity is real then why can I drive in reverse? Check mate Danny Boi
@@christianege4989 I disagree... they have a truly spectacular lack of understanding, lol.
TRUE, if gravity suddenly stopped and the earth was left crumbling, the atmosphere wouldnt shoot out and spread across the universe to fill the void, it would slowly dissipate based on interactions with the matter around it. they always seem to think vacuums are these monstrous forces, throwing around the evil sounding numbers 10 to the negative however many not even stopping to realise that that is a tiny number, and the vacuum is the absence of matter, ergo energy
its because their vacuum cleaner sucks, thus that must mean vacuums suck
So they believe density makes thinks fall to the floor but the atmosphere, which has density, should fly off into a less dense environment? Interesting
Just one of the contradictions of the globe earth 'debunking' pseudointellectuals.
because they are still echoing the "it is vacuum so it must be sucking thing out"
While singularly being unable to explain why something falls "down" (towards the centre of mass of the Earth) and not some other random direction due to their buoyancy theory.
I think they believe that gases aren't actually substances, they're some kind of magical ether that fills "empty" space.
just like your hoover (vacuum) makes dirt, which has density, fly off into its bag.
Nathan Oakley's van driver take on physics. Always gold.
Even if you would take Nathan into space, to the moon and back, he will still find a way to say it was all fake.
If it was possible to take Nathan into space, I'd say do it.
Bringing him back, though? Well......
Why would you wanna bring him back ?
Take half of the world's flerfing idiots and offer them the chance to perform an experiment that will 100% confirm if the Earth is flat and space is fake. Have them sign a waiver that they alone are solely responsible for the consequences of their actions with no possibility for their heirs / next-of-kin to sue as a result of the experiment. Live stream the entire process from start to finish on any and all platforms they choose. Allow them to have as many other flerfing idiots watch the process with absolutely no interference from any government agency. Send those who have agreed to the ISS. Put them in an airlock without spacesuits and give them the opportunity to go EV in shorts and a t-shirt. See how many of them suddenly decide space is, in fact, very, _VERY_ real.
Yep, the glass in the wins distorts everything. I've already seen his answers to any of the space station pics.
He would probably claim to have been tranquilized on the way to the rocket and brought into some swimming pool with LCD Displays as spacecraft "windows".
Nice to see that there's some continuity in this crazy world of ours: The Sun continues to rise and set every day; Canadian winters are still cold; N.O. is still a top-drawer bull$hit merchant....
(Edit: Sorry, Dan; I simply couldn't make it to the end of this video - the urge to rearrange N.O.'s dental work by force was simply too strong in me.)
Absolutely. I would do time for that fcker
Yep, I couldn't make it to the end.
Yes, I had to take a deep breath or three also. I imagine having a "discussion" with this guy in a pub could turn real nasty, real quick! I did make it to video's end, though 😄
@@rexharrison6827 - My hunch is that he would be far less confrontational (and, quite frankly, a far less offensive human being) in-person, where he would be without the protection of both the internet and his mute button.
I worked at Digital Domain in 1996, not long after they were nominated for, but ultimately lost the visual effects Oscar for Apollo 13 to Babe. It was thought within the company that they may have lost because people didn't realize the amount of visual effects that were in the movie - they used no archival footage of the launch in the film. So let's set 1995 as the year where you could fool the public with convincing CG for space stuff. And this is from a top notch visual effects company using cutting edge and extremely expensive computers and software - tens of thousands of dollars with a limited set of people that knew how to use them. I'd really like to hear an explanation from any of these people of how you could create a convincing fake before that time, much less 27 years before then.
@Keith Huggins Thanks
Well 2001 A Space Odyssey had brilliant Graphics in the 1970s !!!!!
Their reply would be like "Look, they faked it in 1995, therefore they faked it in1969 too!" ...
He's saying "Second Law Of Thermodynamics Violation Vacuum" as if it was some kind of magic spell
He forget to swish and flick.
I find comfort in the guaranteed posting you do on Tuesday and Friday sciman. I always watch them before heading to work because they are on my notifications really early here on the east coast of the United states.
VACUUMS create SUCTION!! Outer space is DEBUNKED!! Google ADMITS IT!! ruclips.net/video/z_tAuGN7GEA/видео.html
Nathan has the kind of anger-danger energy that I hope his friends and family leave him for their own safety and his.
I guess we need to add, "Unless acted upon by another force", to every statement in science.
Nathan abusing the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is a the equivalent of a war crime. Makes me cringe every time I hear him misuse it like that. 😩
I love these arguments of "The globe earth model falls apart if we ignore gravity" like wow crazy! Kinda like how no matter how sturdy a building is, it'll fall apart if we remove the foundation. Maybe we should all start believing in flat houses?
Good grief! Imagine the level of embarrassment if he ever wakes up to reality. 🙄
Nathan repeatedly demonstrates that he knows that the Earth is not Flat.
He deliberately chooses what evidence to ignore or misrepresent, and what logical fallacy to apply, in order to avoid the conclusion.
Further, he deliberately bullies people.
Slappy the clown isn't a real flat earther, he's just a con man taking the most stupid in society for whatever he can get
@@antondovydaitis2261 He also bullies defenceless children who rely on being protected by him. 😠
That's a big IF, my dude.
@@antondovydaitis2261 he was so infamous amongst FE debunkers that when he actually deigned to reply to my comment on one of his videos, I took it as a badge of honour to be bullied by this great FE celebrity I had heard so much about!
Every time I hear these people talk about the "INCREDIBLY POWERFUL PERFECT VACUUM", I think back to Futurama.
"How many atmospheres can the ship withstand, Professor?"
"Well it's a Spaceship, so I would guess anywhere between zero, and one."
Sure, the gas pressure at sea level is relatively strong (again, compared to: zero) under kilometres of atmosphere, but that's a smaller jump from 0 to sea level than it is going from the surface of water to a single metre underneath. Vacuum doesn't have "strength", it's a simple lack of atmosphere, so its relative "strength" only exists in COMPARISON to the pressure around it.
Think about it. Is a vacuum at sea level any stronger or more powerful than a vacuum under 10 metres of water? No, of course not, it's a vacuum, it stays the same regardless of outside pressures, and as we get further from sea level what do we get? Less and less pressure, at the absolute limits of our atmosphere the pressure is very very nearly zero, and the vacuum beyond that point? Only a tiny, tiny, tiny bit lower.
The problem for those idiots is that they calculate with percent instead of straight numbers.
And with percent of course a vacuum is indefinitely stronger. 1 atmosphere is infinite percent more than 0.
But what those idiots do not think about is that for example a standard scuba tank has 200 atmospheres of pressure, making it 200 times more difference than between the atmosphere and a vacuum.
But they of course do not want to understand that, because it would blow their believes out of the sky.....
As a young kid, it astounded me that the space shuttle had the landing gear open to the void of space. I thought 'woah, they must be extra strong to not to explode on the vacuum'. Then one day someone told me they were normal airplane tires, just filed with nitrogen. There's no need for anything special, the difference between land and void of space is exactly 1atm, which any tire can withstand, even a car one.
@@framegrace1 Especially since the higher relative pressure inside the tyre while it's in space isn't required to take any weight or do any work.
With your Futurama reference, asking how many atmospheres a spaceship can withstand is relevant if it's required to land on a planet with a higher atmospheric pressure than Earth. Usually, a spaceship will have a lower than sea level air pressure anyway and for the exact same reasons as a jet airliner - it's easier to maintain and the vessel is easier and lighter to build.
@@chrisantoniou4366 in the context of the episode they are sinking deep into the ocean, the line before the ones I quoted was "My god, that's over 1000 atmospheres of pressure!"
You're absolutely correct though :D
Damn Dan, brutally honest. “They figured out R 2000 years ago and were infinitely more clever than you.” I love it. Oakley deserves it.
I haven't tuned into the channel for quite a while but coming back to the news that Oakley has all but fallen off the RUclips space is beautiful music to my ears!
God may not be real but miracles sure are!
oh, anon...
I figured it all out, this is all a ploy to make people money. Dan and the flattys are in on this as they require each other.
So they go back and forward making videos to gain views and money, then they split it all 50-50.
So obvious captain obvious.
The best example of entropy is Nathan's brain.
And it also contains a lot of sky vacuum too!
That funny because I'm currently watching the Apollo 17 mission for it 50 years, and the quantity of pictures and films we have on this mission alone is amazing. But those people always do as if we got just a handful of pictures and few minutes of film from Apollo 11 and nothing else.
They grasp at straws and ignore all else Some of the data and some of the imagery from Apollo 11 was garbled due to issues with Australia All the data from the other 6 landings is available, along with all the data from Apollo 8, 10, and 13 that circled the moon. That little bit is ignored by the nutters
Pictures and films 🤣
@@Hellndegenerates You can pretend they don't exist all you want, you can even pretend they are fake. Your personnal incredulity is all yours, but is not and will never be a proof of anything. ;)
@@Hellndegenerates If you knew anything about rocket-science and space-engineering you could open your mouth and talk with us. If you think the moon landing is fake, you're probably just as fucking dumb as Nathanael.
@@Hellndegenerates Buy KSP on steam market. Do everything just like in the apollo missions and voila, you're on the moon. It's a joke that you dumnfuck are even allowed to access the internet. the whole swiss population laughs at you fucking degen morons suffering dunning-kruger effect. Vistit me at ETH at my courses in science. You fucking worthless tinfoil dipshit american. USA is a joke. apart from cali and some in NY you're the least educated country on earth. L
You don't even need to believe in gravity to prove Nathan wrong.
Throw a ball into the air. What happens? It falls down.
If you can accept that a ball thrown upwards will fall back down (regardless of why), then you disprove Nathan.
Airbus made of molecules, which act like balls. They will have some velocity upward, and like that ball, will fall down.
The faster a ball is travelling, the higher it goes, and you can calculate the height the ball will travel upwards based on its speed. It isn't based on the mass of the ball (you can try it with different mass balls travelling at the same speed and they will go up the same height). So the height of the air molecules will have a maximum height they can travel, which is entirely dependant on their speed.
This means that so long as you can accept that "what goes up must come down", then there can be a region where air molecules can't get to because they haven't got the speed neccsary.
This doesn't require someone to believe in gravity, it just requires them to see what happens when they throw a ball. They can see this with their own eyes, and can be done with objects that they have around their house.
Even children know that when you throw a ball up, it comes back down. But it seems that Nathan doesn't even know that 🙄
I still don't know if Nathan is confused or dishonest.
I believe he is dishonest.
It's why he used to get so upset about Ranty asking questions.
Yeah, there's a meanness to him that goes beyond standard confusion.
This is true. Nathan's show in a total con job. He knows fully well that the Earth is spherical. On his shows he even has pictures of wind farm over the ocean that clearly disappear over the curve while he spouts the FE BS. He makes money off the true believers.
This is a prime example of the Dunning-Kruger Effect in all its sad glory.
With how often he says "sky Vacuum" I think he expects to see Mega Maid sucking up the atmosphere every time he looks up.
"Sky vacuum", tells you all you need to know about Nathan.
The Sky vacuum is hanging on the sky hook
It tells you that he has a head vacuum :P
They always ignore the next bit in the second law, "unless energy is supplied to reverse the direction of heat flow."
From America here, love your upload schedule... When everyone else dies down, for my nights, I always catch your videos within 10-30 minutes. lol
Can't wait to see the reactions to Artemis when we put people on the moon...again.
They will keep claiming it’s fake. You could send some of these con artists to space and they would still yell about CGI. It’s actually pretty pathetic.
@@mjjoe76 The good thing about sending these con artists into space is that they don't believe in neither gravity nor vacuum we don't need to worry about space suits or return vehicles for them. The average IQ of humanity will take a noticeable step up.
@@mjjoe76 The root problem with them is, they're religious extremists. They can't accept facts because they conflict with their views of reality. They literally believe in an upturned soup bowl smacked on top of a pizza, just because some book says so. Flat earthers can never be eradicated unless we eradicate Christianity first.
I can't wait till Artemis leaves a video camera on the moon so flerfers can watch the earth in real time! Will be hilarious. Nathan can watch himself wave at the moon (a few seconds after)!
@@mjjoe76 I wish we could send them all to space. Permanently
Every time I'm feeling down, I watch a Sciman Dan video and take comfort in the fact that at least I have a better grasp of science than the Fleecers in the videos
5th law of thermodynamics : flatearthers are full of cow pow, whatever is the air pression around them.
6th law of thermodynamics: Conspiracy theorists incorrectly using the 2nd law will be swept into the abyss by the winds being compressed and sped up in their home solely because of how mentally inept they are.
I love watching this stuff as I'm full swing in the middle my mechanical engineering degree. All these big words and laws they throw out without understanding just how complicated thermodynamics can really be. That's a nightmare of a class.
What’s really funny about Oakley is that he gets so angry about people who fail to understand his gross misconceptions. He really needs to worry about his blood pressure rather than get angry about the science he doesn’t understand. But he certainly provides excellent entertainment.
If flat earth's air pressure is maintained by being in a closed container, why does it get less the higher you go? Shouldn't it be at the same pressure regardless of altitude?
I've heard their answer to that, they say it's because trees release oxygen down near ground level which causes the pressure to be higher there.. somehow
@@markshort9098 Then why most of the air is nitrogen? It is lighter than oxygen or CO2 (which of course is heavier than oxygen)
@@XtreeM_FaiL that's the flerfs answer not mine
@@markshort9098 Sorry, they're saying that trees fart? Like... wouldn't there be a wind coming off them?
And the weirder part is that INSIDE A CLOSED CONTAINER… guess what. There’s a TINY, though measurable PRESSURE GRADIENT within gasses. It is NOT completely uniform. So even in their precious container, they have a gradient they can’t explain. Shocking.
It keeps coming back to the good old adage, "Vacuums don't suck." Space is not akin to a vacuum cleaner that's holding a hose to our planet and trying to pull our atmosphere away.
vacuum cleaners don't work like that either
Nathan Oakley, so angry that he's not being invited on a space mission.
How does he explain Saturn, Jupiter and Uranus? I love how flat earthers pick and choose which science term they except and reject. Gravity doesn't exist but buoyancy does, ridiculous.
Better yet, they think buoyancy exists but deny that gravity exists, even though buoyancy cannot exist without gravity.
Speaking of vacuums, I think that describes the contents of Nathan's head
So Nathan was once a flying salesman...interesting. It amazes me to no end how people like Nathan can go on and on, and never stop to listen to themselves. Clearly, Nathan is still a 'flyin' salesman'.
Nathan"child-slapper" Oakley claims (I don't know why we should believe it. I'd like to see proof.) that he was a flying salesman. I think he just wants people to know that he actually had a job once.
@@fepeerreview3150 What do you think he sold? I shudder to think about it...
Actually, he was briefly a salesman for expensive (snake oil) hi-fi.
He once appeared on The Gadget Show in the UK - hence him calling himself “Nathan Gadget Oakley” prior to his Flat Earth rebirth.
Unfortunately his anger issues made him unemployable.
@@duncanmcneill7088 Why am I not surprised?
The 2nd law - the entropy will increase over time in a closed system. That bit you missed out is the critical part. The only truly closed system in the universe - is the universe.
Nice channel, Dan. I just discovered it. Now that the first Artemis mission is completed, have you seen anyone calling that fake? I do recall one guy turning up the contrast on the orbital footage and claiming the blocky border between objects and space was proof of fakery.
I just watched a video from planarwalk, someone who debunks flat earthers like sci man dan, debunking someone who called Artemis fake, because "it has no steering wheel"
No joke, some people are that dumb.
@@viewera LOL everyone knows the Orion spacecraft was powered by an outboard motor.
@@PDubbler I've been following these debunking channels for some time and it's unbelievable how stupid flat earthers are.
The question we should be asking is what's the pressure inside Nathan's head? Does it go into negative figures?
The minus numbers DID actually create a negative number in his case! Fascinating...
Why If gravity is real then why can I drive in reverse? Check mate Danny Boi
it's actually unusually high, because his great density gives him his own gravitational field.
I was living on a hill station for 7 years. Water boils at 97 to 98 degrees up there. Not just one thermometer but many doing it over and over again.
To explain less pressure to push against compared to sea level. Also the water has impurities so that is why there is a range.
The atmospheric pressure gradient is one of those many things flat earthers don't want to discuss. It makes their claims look a bit silly.
Water boils at 100° at sea level
Use distilled water no range just a single point of boiling.
@@kmagnussen1052, did just can't remember the value. Mostly used it to clean equipment.
We live above 450 metres and it's the same here. Also there is less heat in the air because there is less air. This is also the reason barometerswork and why climbers of Mt Everest need oxygen and jet airliners need to be pressurized. All acknowledged facts that Oakley can't explain.
For a response to what Nathan is saying regarding gravity at 5:00 please see Desertphile's video from 13 years ago called "gravity" It never gets old
Jokey should know all about perfect vacuums there's one between his ears
As Nathan prattles on and on, I keep finding myself reciting Desertphile's gravity rant.
You're not alone :D
That was a great explanation of entropy. I never thought to use coffee coming to equilibrium temperature. Thank you.
Except that it is incorrect, unfortunately. In general, a process shifting towards equilibrium does not involve an increase in Entropy, and in particular, a cup of hot coffee cooling exhibits a reduction in Entropy, not an increase. For most processes, an increase in Entropy involves a temperature rise. For a single state system, the differential of Entropy is equal to the heat multiplied by the differential in Temperature.
I watched the lunar landing back in 1969. It was the middle of the night, like 2:30-3 Eastern. My parents woke me up to watch it. The stations would have already signed off (Yes, kids. The stations all shut down every night by playing the Star Spangled Banner to a flag waving clip, and didn't play 24/7/366), but they were broadcasting this night. Back then, the space program was significant in school curricula. Had it been all show, it would have been in prime time, I feel like. Alaska had never had live news content before that night, and they put up TV screens in Central Park. That's a shite-ton of coordination for a hoax.
Me too, but in the UK, I was 6.
Me too. It was at my uncle’s house in Germany, and I was nine.
That's a really nice point, and so nostalgic! I was 14 in the summer of 1969 and we were visiting my grandmother outside of Pittsburgh (US).
The _really_ impressive part of the hoax was how they convinced the various militaries and space agencies of all the other countries in the world, a number of whom _really_ didn't like the US, and all of whom were tracking the launch and landing etc themselves.
Tricking all of them... I mean that has to be some _magic_ powers.
My grandmother (born 1906) loved tech stuff. She told me about how she felt, being a child and seeing the first car arrive in her town, and the being an elderly lady, sitting in her living room, watching the Moon landing on television as it happened.
What an amazing century the 20th was!
I've been watching your videos for well over two years now Dan (including RunManDan as it happens) and I can't help thinking that I should have got tired of you making conspiracy theorists look even more ignorant and foolish than they transparently are, but I continue to be enthralled. Keep up the good work!
The live televisionbroadcast of the moon landings would have been impossible to fake with the technology that existed at the time. There was simply no way to produce slow motion beyond a few seconds.
God I can’t stand that guy. Not you SMD you’re doing a great job 👍🏻
Have they ever faced pressure changes with altitude?
That would require them to experience reality, and they're clearly against that.
That would require them to leave their foil-lined basements.
If NO would go on a spaceship and people would go for a space walk he probably doesn't want to wear a space suit.
Hey Dan long time fan of the channel and even longer all time MMA superfan the way you pronounced Rousey was hilarious to me (no hate just banter) 🤣🤣🤣
There was that Australian "scientist" who "proved" the Moon to be plasma. It's on a video so it must be true.
Great video, Dan. It's always fun to see flat earthers screaming "I DON'T UNDERSTAND BASIC PHYSICS".
Love your content scimandan
A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Nathan proves the point.
There are occasions when a subject likely didn't have a mind in the first place. Once again, Nathan proves the point.
Half of the US population proves the point. I don't think there is another country with as much dense poeple anywhere else. The republican party, full of pseudo scientists, religious brainwashed morons, racist psychopaths, gun loving and miniscule intelligent idiots. MERICAA
I'm glad you watch these for us, because I couldn't handle two minutes of this guy.
ohh no. You went from Established titles scam to Raid Shadow Legends scam. Anyone who has played that game knows it is so boring that it plays itself and unless you spend a fortune on microtransactions. You can only get so far in the game before you hit a brick wall
Don't flat earthers say there's a dome over their flat earth (I can only assume it's a see through) then why doesn't the atmosphere reach the dome? and what's underneath the flat earth, rock? is that flat as well? Nathan if the earth does have a dome over it then there will be oxygen to breath so why not go in a hot air balloon with out an oxygen mask see how long you last as you go higher and higher,
Dan can we crowed fund a trip to the moon for Nathan and leave him there
"The Firmament" I think Dave or someone did a video talking about a guy who though he would big chunks of glass from the dome. Lol.
I thought everyone had a personal dome?
Because the dome is as big as the universe.
Additionally, Oakley's claim debunks the flat earth too. The entropy of an isolated system never decreases; which means that for a system in equilibrium, the entropy stays the same; otherwise, the entropy increases until equilibrium is reached.
Oakley's problem is that the pressure gradient of the atmosphere is constant. So much so that meteorologists and geophysicists refer to altitude in terms of pressure. Yes, they talk about altitude in the atmosphere in terms of pascals and NOT meters.
IOW, under Oakley's interpretation, a pressure constant gradient must tend toward equilibrium or it would be a violation of "natural law".
I love how they have to converse over a giant 🖕 from Wikipedia’s flat earth misinformation warning lol 😂🤦🏻♂️
I wonder how he explains barometer readings that vary from day to day or less?
@Mickey Filmer Oh, he tends to accuse the questioner of bringing in irrelevant details to deflect from the main issue and of ignoring the "fact" that you need to have a container to have a pressure to have the gradient in in the first place.
@@Hexalobular
With a container there in no pressure gradient. There is just a static pressure throughout the container.
@@swinde TOTALLY FALSE!
To get that you'd need a container that shielded the contents from the effects of gravity.
Consider a container with holes at different heights and filled with water, the water will be ejected more forcefully from the lower holes.
(If you are a flerf who believes in a firmament you are disproved by the atmospheric pressure gradient. And you are disagreeing with Nathan Oakly and other flerfs.)
@@swinde If you meant to say "With a _sealed_ container there is no pressure gradient" I have a proposal for a clean energy source:
We run a sealed pipeline with wind turbines inside up a mountain, if we close a valve to the outside the air inside should rush up the pipe to even out the pressure, when we open the valve the air inside should rush down the pipe to reform the pressure gradient, generating power both ways, _right?_
@@Hexalobular ...but Oakley is taking about a sealed container. If it wasn't sealed he wouldn't be going on about it preventing the atmosphere from being sucked into space, therefore @Swinde was correct in assuming a sealed container.
5:07 They always confuse the space vacuum with the suction of a vacuum-cleaner, i think.
oh dang.... im a little disappointed in the sponsor... I wont support them but still a great video Dan
whats wrong with the sponsor?
@@leeroy265, it's not that great of a game and has some controversy. Basically you aren't playing the game.
@@amanvarkkey930 Who says?
@@protoborg who says what?
I think Nathan Oakley is a violation of the second law of thermodynamics..
Thermodumbnamics in his case...
Well, technically 'downloading the original' IS a false statement... because the original is film and you can't download the analog negative.
Nathan's bit about clouds would mean that weather was impossible, as high pressure areas would instantly equalise with low pressure systems.
They don’t understand that nothing we observe on earth translates to a flat snow globe earth.
Once your model requires literally all of established science to be rewritten, it should probably clue you in that your model is flawed.
I honestly don’t think most of these guys believe the earth is flat.
I would really like to hear Nathan explain weather, aka uncontained pressure differentials.
Well it's obviously rooted in all the hot air he's blowing
That, or why and how the air pressure is measurably lower at the top of a tall building than on the ground.
The funny thing is they spend all their time "debunking" science but they don't spend a single second collecting data to prove their hypothesis.
Oakley is a strange character - dedicating most of his days to producing videos that then have about 500 views each. I'd go as far to say that, given his audience (such that it is) is probably the same people every day, he's probably totally harmless these days. I'm sure that winds him up more than anything :-)
How many of those 500 views are other content creators visiting to generate their debunking responses, I wonder?
He can no longer afford to buy the views he used to do.
@@davidroberts5090 And people just needing a regular face-palming.
Or who like seeing their stupid raw.
Same ol' lame arguments, just new examples. Yep, Nathan's stagnating. Like all of flat earth.
Just hearing a voice shouldn't instill so much disdain, yet with Oakley here we are.
Did Nathan ever answer Catz? Catz totally destroyed Nathan on his own show lmao
I enjoy starting my week with Flat Earth Friday and ending it with Tinfoil Tuesdays. Your content makes excellent bookends to the work week. Thanks Dan!
I mirror your sentiment.
The Flat Earth vrsion of the 2nd law of thermodynamics is : 'This means that I'm right and you're wrong, nanananabooboo!'
No
No they didnt
100% they didn't, Nothing any flattard can say will change that. (Edit) oh ffs it Nathan slappy dude Oakley, The lying coward who can't convert kilometres to meters.
Beat me to it.
Hahaha Nathan has figured it all out! Nuff said… what a brilliant man, I’d like to meet him one day.
I like it when this channel focuses on those who deny the proven rather than those who assert the unproven. That's why I usually like flat earth Fridays more than TFT. Having a laugh at someone who believes in Santa Claus, for example, wouldn't really hold my interest. So this is a good one
Scimandan has sunk to a new level. First it was Kamikoto Knives, then Established Titles, now it is Raid, Shadow Legends. He really has sold out.
The entropy of a cup of coffee actually decreases as the cools, because the particles jiggle around less as they lose energy so become less disordered. But the heat radiates to the air around it and the increase in entropy there compensates, and entropy is increased overall
It's just adorable how very sure of himself he is.
And, apparently very angry at reality?
Truly, Nathan is one of the worst human being on our globe. Amazing how desperate this group has become. Thanks again Dan.
Nathan takes second seat to Vladimir Putin.
@@Kualinar Putin maybe an awful person, but at least he doesn't deny basic physics.
@@Kualinar if you need someone who denies basic physics and is worse than Jokely, you'd have to choose Santos the Despicable (well, not quite his real name, but more accurate).
@@MaryAnnNytowl I agree. Stupidity is fine but that Santos is worse..DAMMIT, you're right. So transparent when he's wrong, he must resort to anger and petty name calling... what a guru!