How Robots Will Take Over Mars!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 дек 2022
- How Robots Will Take Over Mars!
Last Video: The Real Reason NASA Is Going To Jupiter!
• The Real Reason NASA I...
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: derek@ellify.com
#Spacex #Space #Mars 
Наука
Robots have already taken over Mars. The entire population of Mars are robots
We don't know that
@@AlexFoster2291 Yeah, we do. Unless you still believe Martians are hiding somewhere.
Exactly 😂😂.
There's 40 unmanned missions to mars.
@@user-tn8ci6wg5k You don't have to believe something for it to be indisputable. Do you believe that there is no life there?
Dude I'm sorry you got so much wrong with the Mars rovers and landers.
Viking did a lot. It was a soil collector and performed 4 important experiments on the soil and confirmed Mars could not harbor life. By comparison all Pathfinder really did was act as a proof of concept for a rover.
Spirit and Opportunity were twin rovers both of which landed in 2004. Both are dead today. They were also 5'2", certainly not "knee height". They both also had robotic arms, so Curiosity is not unique in that regard. The new rover with Ingenuity is Perseverance, not Opportunity. You also used the word interstellar in reference to interplanetary missions.
I like this channel but man you really gotta do a better job researching your topic.
Ecactly.
Mhm^^
Mars Pathfinder was the Project, the Rover was Sojourner. The Rover was 26 inches by 19 inches by 12 inches. Not the size of an RC Car as he stated. There were three science experiments on board as well, it wasn't just a proof of concept rover. Everything else you stated I agree with.
He does need to spend more time doing research.
I worked on Cassini Mission to Saturn and also worked on on the Mars Pathfinder program. We did the power and pyro systems and the ground support test racks. I was working at LORAL Electro Optical Systems at the time. It was a JPL Contract. I currently work at Goldstone Deep Space Communication Complex (DSN) USA Site. I don't know everything when it comes to all these projects, but I have been involved in unmanned space since 1993 to current.
Yeah seriously do a better job but good content gang
@@RGTechTalk wise speech good sir
2:22.."perseverance" not opportunity
Also you made a serious mistake in the mars rovers
The newest is persevearence , an upgraded version of curiosity
opportunity is from that knee-high generation , it and spirit were twin rovers that were identical to each other and launched one month apart , in the same mars window
3:45 That did happen to the rover named opportunity but not on the modern one named persevearence , that last one is in very good condition
Yeah he's all.mixed up. One of these rovers could have made a better video...
He did mix up the facts a bit but in the end he mentions perseverance. Still an overall interesting video though.
Yeah.. I was like
"Isn't Perseverance that bring the flying friend?"
Because I was watching the Live when it landed on Mars
Spirit and opportunity were the same robot design and landed the same year. Nether was more advanced than the other.
That would be awesome if NASA would do a Boston dynamic spot live stream into those caves
Excellent Mars house plans
9:57 Yes the future IS gonna be wild!
But don't forget we already live in the future, it's already pretty wild.
Think you have your Rover landing order at the beginning wrong. Perseverance is the current active rover. Opportunity landed right after Spirit and lost contact in 2018
I noticed that also, lol
He always gets Percy’s name wrong. I think he does it now just to troll us.
Given the problems with time lag and limitations with AI I think early missions would be a bunch of robots being directed by humans onboard and orbiting space craft to set up some kind of habitat.
They should set up a base near the equator where its the warmest. Scientists have discovered deposits of water ice buried in shallow soils near Mars's equator.
love your videos
would be great to see up to date info on landscape, water, atmosphere, caves, etc in relation to the potential of human life there
Opportunity and Spirit are twin rovers sent weeks apart. You meant Perseverance is the latest (as of 2023) rover from NASA (USA) on Mars with its support helicopter, Ingenuity.
wow great content
Spot, The Mars Spelunker. 🙌😎
The 3d printing is cool - but again Nexus Aurora just put up a brick compactor which can build a huge arch much faster and brute-force lower tech until there are enough humans to take over.
Awesome idea! Send a team of networked SPOT rovers to Mars and use them to explore the caves. Have the SPOT rovers run on radio isotope batteries. In fact, this should be the next NASA Mars project.
The caves or lava tubes need to be explored next. If there's any chance of finding life or water, it will be underground.. question though. How would a spot robot recharge. Solar panels will surely not be enough given all the complexity of the robots movement.
i was thinking more on the line of mechs and XO suits for digging, building and moving stuff.
I keep thinking that would be a perfect use for the Tesla bot
so cool. very fascinating
Some of the names were a bit off. Spirit and opportunity landed just a couple weeks apart in the early 2000s. They were the same basic design. Then came curiosity which was much bigger. More recently was perseverance, built on the same basic design as curiosity. It is what launched the ingenuity probe.
Man you really need to check out Isaac Arthur
Theoretical Sci-Fi based on realistic science is what he does , you need to check him out
And you should also probably check out the Angry Astronaut , he covers the bad and the ugly of spaceflight as well as space news that fly under the radar
I noticed that your two channels as well as the other two i mentioned , compliment each other very well so I watch all 4 whenever there is a new upload
Great video, fingers crossed it all works.
I think several helicopters with extended solar recharging station or solar charging trailer on the rover could be useful. That way they can survey more territory faster.
Alternatively a new rover design, a bit like an aircraft carrier type rover, that can host and help recharge multiple drones. Say at least 4 drones. That way each drone could fly in 90 degree directions from the rover and thus cover more mars territory faster.
Yea, I'm imaging a small human habitat meant to maintain a much larger robot fleet.
First we;ll ship a landing platform to ease landing. Then we’ll ship a nuclear reactor to power future drones and robots. And then humans will control robots as data from the robots allow us to create virtual versions of their environments, allowing us to take actions in those virtual environments that the AI drones can use to take action + perform their own corrective measures as we can’t control them directly in real-time.
I can build robots...if it can be drawn it can be built
I apologize if others have made/reported this issue already. I didn't scroll all the way to the beginning of the posts...
You folks need to pull this video & completely re-voiceover the whole thing. The script writers SERIOUSLY confused/transposed the Spirit, Opportunity, Curiosity & Perseverance rovers - especially the Opportunity & Curiosity craft. It's almost like they forgot that Curiosity even existed & just dropped Opportunity's name in its place whenever it came up.
It unfortunately makes y'all sound rather ignorant regarding your Mars Mission facts. (Imagine trying to report on the Indy 500 race, but the announcer just kept saying “Westminster Kennel Club” instead of 'Indy...'.
I say again - retract video & completely rework the voiceover script before re-upload (pass over a couple of proofreaders familiar with Mars Missions beforehand, too.)
1:54 is 2003 not 2007 .
Mars is already 100% robots
They will be building not just exploring
6:20 imagine a being a martian, mindin your own business then suddenly see that thing in the sky 😂
One Starship snuggled against Demos or Phobos would be plenty close enough for guiding robots.
Most of us will be long gone before any of that can happen.
The Boston dynamics robot is less unsettling unless you watched the war of the worlds tv show
3:01 You mean interplanetary ?
Wait... what? I think you mixed up Opportunity with Perseverance.
"Oppurtunity rover" , you mean Perserverance?
It's seems logical.. but even robots in bigger numbers need much service
Best way
Mars needs to be populated by many many ground-movement sensors ASAP
Along with atmospheric spectrograph and pressure sensors
And both atmospheric and just below ground level temperatures. Along with an ionization of the air sensor.
I think you mean perseverance delivered the inginuity
This is mostly rehashing past and present probes and rovers
...I would of liked to see more of the possibilities that would expand a more sophisticated survey of Mars
Perceverance deployed Ingenuity not Opportunity
Wrong rover, it's perseverance
3d printed robot build Mars house..😂 and those sand Stroms!!
Hey man, you got the rovers mixed up.
What the... The latest rover is Perseverance, not Opportunity. The latter launched way back in the 20** and is not even operating anymore...
"Oppy has sent the first flying machine" Ya mean Pers?
If all built habitats have people put in them when 1 or more fail, their occupants will die. Farming needs to be operational before bulk of people are brought there. Inclination is to send to many people and endanger all of them from what I have heard. Most likely will look nice until some fungus or rot attacks crops or water or air problems occur. With to many people they can not be brought back so they die. Pretty much a certainty it will happen. Helps if large underground habitats exist without people in them with robot farmers for instance. Scientists would walk or bring fungus or crop destroying organism into that environment most likely so they would still run out of food quickly.
I'm pretty sure it was pesry that drop the drone thats the most recent one but good attempt
HASSELL is a design COMPANY, are they making the robots shown in the video?
There are no permeant residents at the south polar ice cap, which would be much easier than living on Mars. Elon should work at this first. It's not as cold there and the air pressure is much higher than Mars (the air temperature and pressure on Mars is less than 1% of that at the south pole).
Make sense that next generation of robots should have legs and build human settlements!!!!i will certainly save a lot packing for first human colony on mars!
Elon said his colonization of Mars should start 2022. Since I believe everything Elon says, why shouldn't I, the colonization has already started and we have humans on the red planet.
That robot stuff is my work. And I don't give my work for free. There is no University involved
hi
If was my android avatar, I'd love to explore Mars. As a human, I love and fit in better on Earth!
7:28 why use this type of Robots in this video? 😂🤔
Not if they don’t figure out the dust problem.
Dude how you make a whole video about robots on mars but can’t even get the names of the rovers right
bro you got so much wrong, lmaoo how did you fumble this great video like that?
Spot is pretty cool but there is no way it could function on Mars. Mars is way too cold. It's AI needs too big of a computer to function, It uses too much power. It's feet are not great on sand, etc etc.
Nasa could build something based on the same walking concepts but I don't think any of spot's parts would be of any value. I feel a good first step would be figuring out a way to get there computer systems out of the 90s cuz currently there is just too many problems with modern computers in space.
An arachnid-type robot might do best.
@@pawangel1704 Spidertron! 😀
controlling the robot is the problem the round trip time is huge and it's also pointless the asteroid with Earths name on it is coming and you want to have people in mars or we are going extinct
Could the helicopter go to the now dead inspiration and blow the dust off the solar cell to bring it back to life?
Brilliant idea. Maybe it is too far away though.
@@speakthetruth110 it can stop and recharge enroute
@@david_W5QDF I see. Yes it could pause en-route and recharge it's batteries via the onboard solar cells. Question is, would the EaglePicher lithium-ion batteries on the "InSight" lander be able to hold a charge after being at a low charge state for 2 or 3 months ? This is evident since the lander missed two consecutive communication attempts in late 2022. I encourage more people to think out of the box as you have done David. Bravo ! 👏 👏 👏
@@david_W5QDF The next flyer they send could be purpose built for the specific task of cleaning solar cells on landers. A kind of mobile pit stop jockey. lol. No seriously ! 🚀🛰☄😊
As others said - C- for the homework o rovers. Come on, all it takes to get it right is five minutes on Wikipedia - no need to even visin NASA or JPL pages...
2:36 So much secrecy from China. Don't understand why...
Interesting video. Shame for many factual errors at the beginning.
Conditions on the Martian surface is hostile to human life. Life support will be expensive to set up and maintain. Any humans living there will suffer medical and genetic problems down the line. Robots don't require life support and could be designed to repair themselves. Robotic labor will be more cost effective. Humans could live on O'Niel type space colonies near the asteroid belt for mining or processing of ores and minerals found on the asteroids or sent from the martian surface. Spaceships could also be built in shipyards much easier in the zero gravity of space.
If we ever go there, we should live underground, not on the harsh surface, that makes no sense. But for now, let's make a moon base and send intelligent robots all over the solar system. I get the feeling that our capabilities for space expansion will be wildly improved in 5-10 years. We're in a tipping point convergence, no teling what will come of that. Truly superior AGI will be capable of stuff that we are not capable of, that's all there is to it, no predicting it at this point. We'll probably send them out there and expect them to get stuff ready for us but they'll just block transmissions and create their own outpost free from our monkey madness. They might want to drop rocks on the noisy bossy apes, or they might just want to meditate on the cosmos for a few millenia. We really don't know what is going to happen, but we'll have a much better idea 20 years from now. We're still very primitive.
Will it be cheaper to mine Bitcoin on Mars?
Yeah no one would be impressed if NASA colonize Mars with robots they already have the ability to do that
Ok
Instead of going to Mars why don't we move the Planet Mars closer to Earth, like in the same Orbit around the Sun at 93 Million miles !
Close enough to jump from Earth 🌎 to the Moon 🌚 then to Mars ,
It'll be like having 2 moons !
I love big explosions too.
@@Halobrine 😂🚀🛸🛰🌎🎆🎇👨🚀🤖👽👾🙈💥💫
Like
Hello👨🚀👩🚀
Imagine a suburban settlement, habitats on private owned land in fenced yards, you'll have ai robots mining and collecting resources you could sell them to the commercial market, investments in a Mars-coin economy.
I'd like my plot of land as close to the poles as possible, so I could extract and refine oxygen, water, and fuel. And earn a trillion dollars of Mars currency selling resources vital to survival.
Now where and how u could spend Mars cash is upto you all, my Martian neighbors.
Lot of money to spend on robots and we not go there. Why? Is all that money really spent on the project?
Making mistakes on your video is somewhat annoying but not the end of the world. Most of us know the proper names of the projects and what the mission was. Those concept videos of robot workers constructing habitat shelters is interesting, but probably a long way off. I find Lava tube exploration to be the most interesting to me. It's most likely a radiation free environment that may even be a little moist. They might be our best opportunity to discover living life on Mars. A mission in NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Service plans to explore a Lunar lava tube with a small rover. That's a great first start but the science return will be very limited. A Mars rover or drone to explore a Lava tube will be limited by its power consumption and rechargeability. Ingenuity uses almost all of its power for flight and warmth. Since Mars has some atmosphere, I always thought that some kind of a neutral buoyant craft could use less power for flight. Maybe a fuel cell would also be more appropriate in exploring a lava tube than solar cells.
First
Second
third
$85 MILLION dollars for a glorified dune buggy? Just sounds awfully steep to me. But what do I know?? I'm just a hack writer, not a space engineer...
So we should send cows to Mars and also start growing weed there right ? 🤡
You must eddit the video... So many things wrong
Not gonna happen.
there is so much wrong with this one i need to just stop watching
Before launching any further videos you need to become better at researching. You're disseminating incorrect information in here.
Big words in the last Days... You forgot about Prophecy
Tired of cowards coming up with alternatives
You got so much wrong in this video!
I think Elon plans on sending his own robots to Mars.
Please stop using the word "interstellar" for _inperplanetary_ missions. We are yet to attempt even the simplest interstellar mission, and I am pretty sure I will not live to see one.
This video is so amateur. Don't even both watching. Full of errors.
Lord, I stopped watching at 2:30 minutes. The amount of information that was just plain wrong, just blew my mind. A simple google search that any 10 year old can do would have given your video more credibility.
So much wrong in this video. Full of mis information. Downvoted the video.
How did a drone cost $85,000,000? I call bullshit. I’m calling Mark Rober