Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Who Wrote the New Testament and Why did They Write It? -Rabbi Tovia Singer
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 апр 2024
- Help us combat aggressive Jewish evangelism in Israel: outreachjudaism.org/partners/
Let’s Get Biblical Study Guide (Volume 1 & 2) outreachjudaism.org/shop/lets...
outreachjudaism.org/
www.videvo.net
/ tenaktalk
Music: www.purple-planet.com
Music at the end: Adon Olam • ''Adon Olam'' (Eternal...
www.toviasinger.tv/
#toviasinger #Judaism #Christianity #Messiah
I❤ listening and learning from you!
This is so great! Baruch HaShem!
make sure you send a donation not just hot air
I am not a Christian but everything that you have said connects to the teachings of my father and grandfather...More power to you Tovia Singer...
Qur’an 2:113-
The Jews say, "The Christians have nothing [true] to stand on," and the Christians say, "The Jews have nothing to stand on," although they [both] recite the Scripture. Thus do those who know not [i.e., the polytheists] speak the same as their words. But Allāh will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that over which they used to differ.
@@gooner2047 They are both right, the only difference is the New Testament is the negative side of the whole. Are you familiar with Yin Yang, positive and negative makes it whole. The Old Testament is similar to Yin Yang. Jews who practice Judaism are honoring the Old Testament. As the New Testament is only recognizing the negative side of the whole. My friend, that is the difference...
@antonevelone1439 The difference is the jews dont believe in jesus as the messiah and didn't accept what he came with, and they accused Marry of adultery . The Christians went to the extreme and started worshipping jesus and came with the trinity! That's the difference my friend. the old testament been tampered with aswell , and they don't have the torah that God sent moses
@@gooner2047 Basically the same just from a different perspective. Thanks to Rabbi Tovia Singer..
True. Repeating what you learned at school. I was so fortunate to be attracted by Judaism ✡️. Eye opening experience for ever.
Fortunate indeed! 🙏 🎆
I’m brand new to this channel and I’m absolutely loving it. As a completely separate non religious question, what is the song at the end of each video. Thank you.
Adon Olam (those first 2 words mean Master of the world) which is in the beginning of the morning prayer called Shacharis/Shacharit that Jews say daily.
Thank you very much.
@@michaelh3299 My pleasure. Glad you are enjoying the channel. You can always leave a question in the comments section and someone will try to answer if they know. ☺️
It's the best YT channel! ❤📺
@@1InvisibleSongstress
The song is Adon Olam - "Lord of the Universe."
Thanks to many of your messages on RUclips quite truth revealing
Dear Tovia Singer. I'm an ex-muslim and I am very thankful for the content you are putting out. I'm curious about all religions and its very hard to find sources that explain Judaism without being polluted by Politics or History. I watched a lot of Rabbis talking trying to understand what Judaism is truly about but only you made it clear.
You are truly pure and Universal and may God bless you.
Fully agreed, friend, Rabbi Singer has a special touch ... watching him is an informative pleasure 📖📚☀️
@@mwola
I’ve never thought that actually. By virtue of one indisputable fact. Not one Christian authored the gospels, believe it or not 11q13, the Melchizedek scroll says that Melchizedek leads an army of angels as if he commands them.
Christians were not the first binitarians, Jewish Essenes were. Unless you really believe man can command the angels no different than Jehova.
as someone who is muslim, i‘m curious because rabbi tovia agree‘s with islam a lot. what are your thoughts on islam?
@@zin3d1n5 Islam is last religion unaffected by modern ills. It will outlast everything as it is meant to.
@@zin3d1n5who are you asking
That was so very interesting: it is funny because christians have so much to learn - from you!! Thank You.
Qur’an 2:113-
The Jews say, "The Christians have nothing [true] to stand on," and the Christians say, "The Jews have nothing to stand on," although they [both] recite the Scripture. Thus do those who know not [i.e., the polytheists] speak the same as their words. But Allāh will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that over which they used to differ.
Thanks!
Thank you Rabbi!
Thank you!
@ToviaSinger1 Rabbi Singer, I'm a Catholic that prays a couple hours a day.
What would happen if I died tomorrow??
Very interesting. I will definitley be watching some more.
I was a little surprised that in a discussion about Paul's views, there was no mention of the fact that about half of Paul's epistles are known to be pseudepigrapha.
Love you Rabbi
Thank you rabbi...true hero!
Thank you Rabbi
GOD say don't put trust in the flesh u will be curse! Jeremiah.
He was referring to the flesh of the Romans who were behind the compilation of letters by Paul the Roman citizen and educated Jew "turned christian" in his own original way..
Hearing you speak really confirm my Jewish belief! ✡️
ya the talking snake and donkey makes lots more sense,,,,LOL
@@woodytheduke Your point?
@@bubbagumpy978 crystal clear dude,,,,read it again
@@woodytheduke Not so crystal clear. I asked a simple question. Does an unclear statement mean that you don't believe in God at all? Simple question. Not all can read into your deep statements.
@@bubbagumpy978
Balaam.
He kept beating the donkey because she saw the angel and wouldn't go forward until he finally got backlash from the donkey.
The curse then turned into a blessing
This content is gold. As an x-moslem i try to read as much as i can about other religions. Sadly there is not much quality content, dialogues on Judaism. I'll appreciate if you can share some good sources like podcast, dislogues etc. I try to listen while i drive.
It is crystal clear that the gospel authors intended to give the Jews a very bad name and ultimately bring an end to Judaism but they failed woefully
It's obvious that the gospels are a polemic against the Jews and their faith. It was written to destroy the faith in the Torah because the Jews dared to rebel against Roman rule twice.
@@nigatuabera4762Clearly his followers rather belief paul and not their idol. They claim they follow him but are to eager to be minimalists because works cant save you.
We're still here! Am Yisroel Chai!
@@bubbagumpy978 you sound ridiculous.
@@bubbagumpy978What is the evidence for the claim that the Oral Torah was added later by humans?
I remember hearing Prof. Paula Fredriksen answer a question about Paul's character and she replied, "Put it this way, if he asked my daughter in marriage,the answer would be no" emphasis added. Much to what Rabbi Singer described.
If Muhammad asked your daughter’s hand in marriage what would you say?
@@user-id1zo2bl6h 🤔The short answer is no,the long answer is NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
@@baldeagle-cq2jl so we agree on something! My beef with Rabbi Tovia Singer is saying he doesn’t stick his nose into other peoples religious business. That’s fine. But he does criticizes my Christian faith and that’s fine, I can handle that. However he never mentions Muhammad and when he does it’s always a superficial response - a lot of dancing. Rabbi doesn’t state that Muhammad is a false prophet that fulfills Deut 18:19-22.
Take Care,
And May the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob bless you.
Praying for the peace of Jerusalem and Israel.
Paul also wrote " Jumanji"
Had no idea he was so multi-genre! Loved Jumanji, much much more exciting & engaging than Thessalonians or Galatians! 🐅🐘🐍
Todah Rabba!
Thank you, William Hall, for level, fair, unbiased programing. Tovia is simply an emotional saint and mental genius.😇
Book of Mark was the first book. Mark is a Roman name Marcus, which means consecrated to the god Mars the god of Rome…. Romans writers created Jesus
The Epistles were written prior to any Gospels. Paul describes a spiritual Jesus, n Mark then created an earthly Jesus.
@peterrabbit1054 Paul's resurrection is different from the gospels: a new glorious body that can go to heaven. The gospels talk about a resuscitated body with scars, and this body cannot go to heaven. This is the reason why Jesus in John says to Mary, " Do not touch me for I have not ascended to my father. " If Jesus had the same body that he was born with, he could not ascend up to the heavens.
The gospels were concocted by the catholic church after 70 ad. Paul was a false apostle who took the writings of John and James and edited them to fit his false doctrines. Lies mixed with some truth. Anyone who has actually studied the bible without any bias and are not trying to force scripture to fit a personal interpretation know the NT is corrupted, edited, mistranslated and misinterpreted. Its very obvious.
Yes, because Paul had never met Jesus and had no idea of him. From his letters Jesus remains bloodless without any history, any sermons, any parables.
The only thing he told about Jesus' life was the last supper tale, a momentuous invention!
Hate to admit it but Rabbi has strong evidence and knowledge on this matter. I have to say that I have my doubt on Paul where the Rabbi explanation answers most of my own curiousities since many years ago.
Rabbi Singer always brings such knowledge and evidence 🙌 Such an enjoyable fascinating channel
Qur’an 2:113-
The Jews say, "The Christians have nothing [true] to stand on," and the Christians say, "The Jews have nothing to stand on," although they [both] recite the Scripture. Thus do those who know not [i.e., the polytheists] speak the same as their words. But Allāh will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that over which they used to differ.
@@gooner2047 🥱
@@gooner2047 such false words in the Koran. We jews say the Christians have nothing but even the Christians admit the Old Testament is the word of God. Stop your fake news nonsense
I’m no. 300 baby! You’re the man Rabbi Singer. We love ya!!!
Thank you rabbi
Paul's Epistles were written prior to the Gospels! There are so many parallels between Paul and Jesus, particularly in Acts. He seems to believe himself as The Christ- As in Gal 6:17 I would not be surprised, if Jesus was constructed from Paul's writings 🧐
Christians should ignore Paul's writings because he himself said that he was possessed by an Angel Satan
Paul is the false Apostles spoken of in Revelation 2:2
Yes, they were written before the gospels! I tried telling this to Christians but they said that was the devil deceiving people. No. We have evidence that his letters were first. It's incredible: you give them evidence and they deflect and use insults.
You can't prove that Paul wrote first or that there was a single Pauline author. I don't believe the official story. And I respectfully disagree with Rabbi Singer that Paul didn't know he was writing the Bible.
@@arriuscalpurniuspiso there r a # of clues that the Epistles were first - Acts uses Paul's experience as its core. Paul's account of Jesus is of a spiritual nature - because there wasn't yet an earthly Jesus, n That's where the Gospels come in.
@@arriuscalpurniuspiso
How would Paul know that he was writing for a Biblehow would Paul know that he was writing for a bible, that didn't even exist, and that no one was even thinking about it at that time
I do believe Paul knew what he was writing but he was under the influence and he was being possessed by an Angel Of Satan and he States so in his writings
Out of 13 letters Paul wrote only seven of them were written by Paul according to the experts
what is amazing is how we read the new testament and then want to tell you about it. your so well educated, you need to teach us. We have no idea about anything other than, it makes me feel good when I am afraid or in my room, I feel like god is talking to me. maybe as a relaxing book.
Merci beaucoup pour la vérité monsieur rabbi shalom
I very much respect how well-read rabbi Tovia is. I'm a devout Christian who will never, ever apostatize BUT I respect anyone who has actually taken the time to read The Holy Bible and tried to make sense of it rather than seethe in utter contemptment of the faith and dismissing it outright.
It is indeed wonderful to encounter someone who reads & wrestles earnestly with the Bible✌️
Qur’an 2:113-
The Jews say, "The Christians have nothing [true] to stand on," and the Christians say, "The Jews have nothing to stand on," although they [both] recite the Scripture. Thus do those who know not [i.e., the polytheists] speak the same as their words. But Allāh will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that over which they used to differ.
@@gooner2047 fake news
You are right Rabbi.
Onto us a child is born and a son is given. The Lord has already granted forgiveness, but some remain unbelievers.
You need to include Marcion in any discussion of New Testament origins, Marcion's Evangelion and Mark were probably late first century and are synoptic and Matthew and Luke were early second century. Luke is a highly interpolated version of the Evangelion might be a response to Marcion, but the writer of Luke and Marcion might have used a common text, with Marcion preserving it closer to its original form and Luke, possibly using material from Matthew and other sources to embellish it. These texts are also the ones we have access to due to their preservation. There is evidence for other early writings that are now lost to us which have echos or inclusions in the surviving texts, and there were other later attempts at Gospels that have been recovered.
Why are there hundreds of variant versions of the Christian bibles none used match the earliest original koine Greek new testament or Hebrew sources?
Bizarre
@@bt-lt4os 1 John 5:7-8, John 7:53,John 8:11, Mark 16:9-20, Mathew 17:21 just a few additions made not found in earliest original koine Greek new or the testament papyrus.
Then all the changes church fathers made to the Hebrew scripture.
And there are currently over 30 thousand different sects of churches all argue with each other who is " correct" and which bible should be used.
Kindly verify.
תודה
I think I might be able to explain this. The versions just differs in how litteral or paraphrasing they are.
For example :
During that time the phrase "did you eat" might have been a phrase you welcomed people with.
The literary translation will therefore say exactly "Did you eat", while a paraphrasing transation might say "Welcome"
@@2024years_since.... Complete new passages admitted insertion by church fathers 1 John 5:7-8 .
John 7:53
John 8:11
Mark 16:9-20
Not found in original koine Greek new testament.
Mathew 17:21 removed.
Then all the changes church fathers made to the Hebrew bible such as " Virgin in future tense" Isaiah 7:14 just one of hundreds of changes .
@@MitzvosGolem1 Where did you get from? I don't know Greek, so I need help to know how I should deal with what you wrote.... I mean like: Why were they added? Did they come from somewhere? etc
@@2024years_since.... The oldest original Christian bibles were in Koine Greek.
None used today match the original earliest new testament.
Look up " koine Greek new testament papyrus p75, 125CE".
Acretions, embelleshments, interpolations, in other words it was a case of playing broken telephone.
But, who would or could figure that out in that period of history?
Only the educated elites, privileged people, the social engineers of their day.
1:51 Codex Vaticanus is, as the name implies, a Codex.
_"Julius Caesar may have been the first Roman to reduce scrolls to bound pages in the form of a note-book, possibly even as a papyrus codex.[17] At the turn of the 1st century AD, a kind of folded parchment notebook called pugillares membranei in Latin became commonly used for writing in the Roman Empire.[18] Theodore Cressy Skeat theorized that this form of notebook was invented in Rome and then spread rapidly to the Near East.[19]"_
_"Codices are described in certain works by the Classical Latin poet, Martial. He wrote a series of five couplets meant to accompany gifts of literature that Romans exchanged during the festival of Saturnalia. Three of these books are specifically described by Martial as being in the form of a codex; the poet praises the compendiousness of the form (as opposed to the scroll), as well as the convenience with which such a book can be read on a journey. In another poem by Martial, the poet advertises a new edition of his works, specifically noting that it is produced as a codex, taking less space than a scroll and being more comfortable to hold in one hand. According to Theodore Cressy Skeat, this might be the first recorded known case of an entire edition of a literary work (not just a single copy) being published in codex form, though it was likely an isolated case and was not a common practice until a much later time.[20]"_
_"As early as the early 2nd century, there is evidence that a codex-usually of papyrus-was the preferred format among Christians. In the library of the Villa of the Papyri, Herculaneum (buried in AD 79), all the texts (of Greek literature) are scrolls (see Herculaneum papyri). However, in the Nag Hammadi library, hidden about AD 390, all texts (Gnostic) are codices. Despite this comparison, a fragment of a non-Christian parchment codex of Demosthenes' De Falsa Legatione from Oxyrhynchus in Egypt demonstrates that the surviving evidence is insufficient to conclude whether Christians played a major or central role in the development of early codices-or if they simply adopted the format to distinguish themselves from Jews.[25]"_
" "
G d bless you Rabbi, Wil'liam... written to get people to believe in Jesus yes but also to condemn the Torah of Moses, the observant Rabbis and children of Israel and damn/destroy/malign Judaism.
True Christianity does not condemn the Written Torah. It condemns the Oral Torah.
Modern Christians have no clue as to what the scriptures actually says. That is how Tovia is making them look like fools.
@@bubbagumpy978 Very interesting🤔 Would love to look up how NT condemns Oral but not written Torah, thanks 🙏
@@bubbagumpy978 you sound like you know something... would you like to throw some light on what the Jewish scriptures are really saying? Thanks 👍 enlighten us please...
@@bigtomboye I replied to one of your other posts with the information.
5:54 There are two candidates, if you look at early tradition.
St. Irenaeus, who left Asia Minor at 16, affirms the Gospeller was the Son of Zebedee, one of the Twelve.
Those left back in Asia Minor do not seem to think so. One of them, defending 14th of Nisan, refers to a John "who wore the golden headband" meaning he probably served as Cohen Gadol one of the years in the Temple.
Herzog poses with his fancy watch many times. Many of them do.
Acts was written in Greek, presumably by St. Luke the Evangelist. The Gospel According to Luke concludes where Acts begins, namely, with Christ's Ascension into heaven. Acts was apparently written in Rome, perhaps between 70 and 90 ce, though some think a slightly earlier date is also possible.
Flavian Imperial Court intrigue sponsored the beginnings of the gospels.
I think when we are talking about the NT, we should not assume that what we see today is the 1st century originals. We don’t know what the original 1st copies said. What we have today as the NT, is of earliest the fourth century, or even later, well in the age of the Roman Church. So what we factually have is a product of the Roman Church, and to understand the purpose of this NT, it must be understood in de context and purpose of the Roman Church, which is in all means a political-religious institution/instrument. Scholars shouldn’t just see the NT in the lens of archeology and history, but also in the lens of politics.
The originals are in Jerusalem and the owners are the Greek Orthodox church.
@@bt-lt4oscarbon 13 dating is known to be off plus or minus several hundred years.
Indeed the NT is political! It reeks of Roman Empirical propaganda!
How is it (at time when the Roman’s controlled Jerusalem) that the NT writings effortlessly vilify the Jewish leadership and honor the Roman leadership? JC is recorded as being complimentary of a Roman Centurion and Pontius Pilate who was a cruel, vicious, hard-headed, insensitive, and brutal ruler is portrayed as a wise and rather sensitive aristocrat who would go out of his way not to offend Jewish sensibilities? Sadly, this political perversion still rings true today.
Its a crime scene.....But Rabbi Tovia is on the case!
4:52 There is no childhood narrative in either Mark or John.
Because Peter and John both became disciples when Jesus was already an adult, and because His older fosterbrother St. James' account of the childhood was already taken in patches by Matthew and Luke, not much to go for a third or fourth Gospel taken different ones.
I had a pastor told me that we are to follow Paul's teachings and not jesus's
Paul was an occultist himself just like these Freemasons today "the same people"
Where did you get that from?
@@2024years_since.... from experience and investigation is called critical thinking
There is nobody doing the works of Jesus
Nobody's out witnessing about Jesus you're letting the preachers do it and they're all Freemasons and they're taking all your money
Except why would Freemasons be occultists? I grew up in a town that had a Masonic Temple and knew a Freemason or two and they seemed to be perfectly ordinary people.
@@user-uo7fw5bo1o have you ever heard the phrase "on a need to know basis"
Qur’an 2:113-
The Jews say, "The Christians have nothing [true] to stand on," and the Christians say, "The Jews have nothing to stand on," although they [both] recite the Scripture. Thus do those who know not [i.e., the polytheists] speak the same as their words. But Allāh will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that over which they used to differ.
Fake news
5:01 Joseph had died before Jesus took disciples.
St. James the Theadelph obviously knew St. Joseph and who was his father as well as Our Lord's fosterfather, but he became a believer only later after the Resurrection, at least an open one.
So, no reason why either Mark or John should mention him. In Luke he's mentioned in connexion with the supposal that in Mark 6 is voiced so Peter heard it. However, the guys were not mentioning Joseph who had already died.
Very simple.
Look at the context.
Who would have an interest in villifying the Jews when they are at a time of war against the Jews?
Class?
Very simple answer class.........
What should current Christians do? Convert to Judaism????
Learn the Doctrine of Christ, and not some dingbat theology the modern church puts forth.
If you are asking this question, you probably never knew the gospel as it was given and followed by the early church.
You don't need to convert, you can just be a Non-Jew who recognizes Judaism and Torah as truth; follow the moral instructions but not the religious instructions 🌼🐦 Pray to Hashem for Wisdom and Health😊
You may wish to become a Noahide, a Non-Jew who follows the 7 Noahide Laws🙏
Gentiles need to keep the 7 Noahide laws.
Islam is the other option, up to you
@@abc_6 If Jesus isn't the Messiah or born of a virgin, how would Islam be an option?🤔
through the Noahide covenant this ex- Christian learned to love the Jews. You are right about Paul. He was a megalomaniacal mystic and gnostic looking to start his own religion and live on in history. He succeeded.
I will liken paul to the pharaoh of Egypt.paul changed from prosecuting followers of jesus to a follower of jesus.after the pharaoh suffered the greatest defeat of his life he went all over in his kingdom and beyond telling people what happened to him and the mighty army urged people to serve and believe in the God of israel.
The funny thing about all of this is, Jesus worship the Lord God of the ark of the covenant at the second temple on the temple mount. That’s who Jesus worshipped even stated the father is greater than I meaning the Lord God of the ark of the covenant. even the Muslims, although they deny it, they worship the god of Abraham father of the Jews. and worship the god of Moses, the God that helped the Israelites and Moses cross. The Red Sea parted it in fact, so the Israelites could escape. same. God gave Moses and the Israelites, the land of Israel, the same God of Noah, the same God that king David was given the ability by to kill goliath, so how could there be a different God? There is only the Lord God of the ark of the covenant. That’s who God actually is in the whole world. Is going to find out simply a matter of time the Meshia will show up the third temple on the temple mount will be built and the ark of the covenant will be returned. All of the world will know that is God, and we as one world, and one people will have him to worship in his actual presence. That’s the future of this world, and many other great things not so far away, in fact.❤DALE. I AM WHO I AM. Is The Lord GOD. Simple truth
Amen
Your hero taught the idolatrous trinity.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 what I said, was Jesus worshiped the Lord God of the ark of the covenant on the temple mount at the second temple. The lord god of the ark of the covenant is my God. Perhaps you should reread and understand what you read before making an assumption god bless.❤️DALE.
@@dalemcmurray-hn6sc Your hero taught the idolatrous trinity.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 did you even take the time to read what I wrote? I think you should read again what I said.❤️DALE.
Does anybody know the language in which Paul's letters were written in?
Paul was a Roman citizen and spoke Greek. He was the student of Gamaliel and must have studied some Hebrew. The earliest copies of Paul's epistles are in Greek. There are no autographs of the epistles, but when Paul quotes from the Old Testament, it is clear he is sourcing from the Septuagint which is a Greek translation of the Hebrew scripture. Therefore it is reasonable to assume that Paul composed the epistles in Greek as well.
@@BabyHoolighan thank you, the reason I asked because his letters would have been some of the earliest writings. Even before the four Gospels. And you always hear that Jesus spoke Hebrew or Aramaic so I was thinking just maybe he would have something in those languages
@@allmapepz I believe the earliest document of Paul's writings are refered to as P46 dated to 125-225 C.E. The scholarship is extensive. You might want to look at the Peshitta which is a translation of the entire Bible into Syriac, a dialect of Aramaic. I bring this up because there is a minority of scholars that approach the research from the perspective of the primacy of Aramaic in biblical studies. And finally, there are the Aramaic Targums (sp?). But be warned, stepping out into this world of rich possibilities is like venturing out into a vast ocean without a boat.
Never have read Paul and am quite surprised by the arrogance in the excerpt🤔 Often am curious how/why Hashem permitted Paul's destructive work!🤔
He allows it to see who follows it
@antoniopadro1760 Thank you; yours is the best most logical answer it seems🙏
If Hashem was the God of the bible there would be many things that would not have happened to the Jewish people. If putting a false Messiah to death had been a righteous deed, then YHVH would have blessed them greatly despite what man would try to do to them.
Hashem has allowed them to be driven from 109 countries, and to be under continual persecution for 2000 years. They have not had even 1 day of complete safety since Jesus was crucified.
You can make the connections yourself.
@@bubbagumpy978 So anxious for people to stop believing Christian propaganda. The insanity of this line of thinking is quite disturbing.
Qur’an 2:113-
The Jews say, "The Christians have nothing [true] to stand on," and the Christians say, "The Jews have nothing to stand on," although they [both] recite the Scripture. Thus do those who know not [i.e., the polytheists] speak the same as their words. But Allāh will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that over which they used to differ.
Out of the Ten commandments ( leave aside the whole law), how many do you follow -- one? Two?
The book of Revelations was written by a Greek called John having visions in a cave a bit like Mohammed was Paul still considered himself a Pharisee but I guess what we would call these days a woke one cause he had done away with all the rituals
Quran wasnt written by Prophet Muhammad it was orally revealed. Prophet Muhammad was unlettered.
What role (influence) did the Jewish War of 66 to 70/73ACE and its aftermath have in a possible late first and early second century Christian desire to disassociate themselves from the Jews in the greater Roman world as well as cause the formation of the various canonical Gospels (there are others)?
Who wrote and how the books of the New Testament were written continues to be a matter of debate between secular modernist scholars and traditionalist scholars. How each group views the documents depends on that group's underlying assumptions. They are using exactly the same documents and archaeological findings regarding the early Jesus community, as well as the context of Greco-Roman culture and Second Temple Judaism, yet coming up with different conclusions.
Since none of the scholars were actually there at the time, such disagreement is entirely foreseeable.
Yo my bro, the ice cream man is not so happy and if he don’t get what he wants, he will back down. I’d advise don’t trust in the US but trust in God. The time is ticking. It’s going to be painful for my fellow Jews, but fear not stay strong and believe. This is one wicked world, and we all need to come back to the Almighty!!
The better and more relevant question is who wrote the Quran? That is the question. Please answer that I would like to hear your response.
why? you think that if it would be debunking islam it would look much different then with christianity? they see jesus as a prophet - I rest my case ... lol 🌹☺️
3:06 It's years since I went through St. Paul's letters, but if your impression is "the big issue is if Christians have to keep the commandments" this gives a very huge impression that St. Paul's followers were in a big part of Jewish ethnicity.
3:39 That's like saying "we have no way of knowing Moses was the son of Amram"
We know that because of the Hebrew tradition, 2000 years ago common to those who were already Samaritans, those who became what we now call Jews and those who became Christians.
We know the authors were Hebrews, except St. Luke. For Hebrews, two suggestions involve Sts Paul and Barnabas, both disciples to Gamaliel. For the Johannine corpus, the majority position in tradition says "the son of Zebedee" while Fr. Jean Colson has made an argument the author is not one of the twelve, but instead a Cohen.
The New Teatament is letters and documentary of the Apostle and decilples. I believe that they chose what they wanted to be in those books to accommodate the Greek customs of that Day. The TORAH is the only written document given to Moses from Hashem at Mt Siani.
4:40 St. Peter reads alternatively from the Gospels of Luke and Matthew, skipping some, inserting some, and his secretary Mark takes notes, and this happened before St. Peter was killed by Nero and also before St. Mark came to Alexandria, as the first bishop there.
This is obviously not exactly the version of the tradition given by St. Augustine, but it is the one of Clement the Stromatist, who lived, precisely, in Alexandria.
_"The Stromata (Greek: Στρώματα), a mistake for Stromateis (Στρωματεῖς, "Patchwork," i.e., Miscellanies), attributed to Clement of Alexandria (c. 150 - c. 215), is the third of a trilogy of works regarding the Christian life."_
This means his life spans the following popes of Alexandria or patriarchs, or less anachronistically bishops:
(8) Markianos (142-152)
(9) Celadion (152-166)
(10) Agrippinus (167-178)
(11) Julian (178-189)
(12) Demetrius I (189-232)
He died after all of the following had died, the first being the Gospeller:
(1) Mark the Evangelist (43-68)
(2) Anianus (68-85)
(3) Avilius (85-98)
(4) Kedron (98-109)
(5) Primus (109-121)
(6) Justus (121-131)
(7) Eumenes (131-141)
To pretend Clement or Celadion and Agrippinus to name bishops from his youth didn't know what they were talking about won't fly.
2:52 In Acts, St. Paul argues with the Synagogue of Beroea.
A Christian Church to this day, by now since centuries and probably most of the time since 1053, Greek Orthodox.
This would be the context in which he does the same for Jews in Thessalonica.
And he praises them as basically his best Church.
The observance of the Jewish religious laws was an important issue in the first century when Paul was writing to the churches.
I believe that the second coming of Jesus was also expected to happen imminently, like, say, the first century. Jesus still hasn't returned bodily. I don't understand why it is taking so long, unless Jesus was misquoted, or something terrible happened to him in Heaven after his ascension or Jesus was mistaken.
Paul and the widow Mary of Magdala were like Will and Grace, and Peter and Matthew were like Seinfeld and Costanza, and that's why we have two religions.
Judaism forbids new religions.
❤
The gospel prototypes were written after '"paul's" early prototypes.
YES,ALL KINGS SHALL FALL DOWN BEFORE HIM; ALL NATIONS SHALL SERVE HIM ✝️🩸 { psalm 72-11}
Before Solomon! That's what the text says!
Paganism. 🗿It referred to Hashem only!
I don't understand why Christian always misinterpreting scriptures 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Dear Rabbi,
I need your help understanding this!
I have a stone edition tanach because others said it was best, but I just found a verse that is truly disturbing to me… The more I read it the more I’m hoping it’s a bad translation…
Isaiah: 52:13 & 53:10
Behold, my servant will succeed; he will be exalted and become high and exceedingly lofty.
Hashem desired to oppress him and he afflicted him; if his soul would acknowledge guilt, he would see offspring and live long days and the desire of Hashem would succeed in his hand.
----------
Does this mean that the servant will be very good and that God is hurting him for amusement (desired to attack) and wants him to acknowledge his guilt?
Like, is God wanting him to see him as pure evil for knowingly and intentionally hurting good for amusement?
And once he sees God as pure evil he starts doing God’s will of hurting good beings too (desire of Hashem would succeed in his hand)?
Am I understanding this properly?
Is this a bad translation?
Does God want his people to harm good beings with him?
Answered you in last video w this comment
@@Yehonatan613 a little early, but Shabbat HaChodesh my dear friend 🙂🙏🏼
While im not fluent in Hebrew, too many Orthodox Jews have recommended the Stone Translation as the Only Worthwhile English Translation🪨
Do not fear🙏 You are not understanding the passage in full properness; don't give up 🙏
In short, the suffering servant is Israel (not JC). Rabbi Tovia Singer has many videos explaining Isaiah 53. He also goes into detail in his 2 Vol. Books: “Let’s Get Biblical.”
10:39 There is a totally different reading of Galatians 2 in Clement. The Cephas that St. Paul opposed was _not_ the Apostle Peter.
Paul was simply exposing frauds, which at first he had taken for people from Jerusalem, which they then weren't.
*And when they had known the grace that was given to me, James and Cephas and John, who seemed to be pillars, gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship: that we should go unto the Gentiles, and they unto the circumcision:*
In other words, three men pretended to be chief apostles, weren't, but as Paul didn't see the real men all that often, he was at first taken in.
10:24 Where in Acts do you pretend Paul went to Jerusalem to circumcise Timothy?
I did a search and found Acts 16, when he came _from_ Jerusalem. The one big time he was there, the Apostolic Council.
5:33 _"made up their own stories that are not related to each other"_
Or rather, each took a pick from St. James' Proto-Gospel, so they are related. To each other because to fact.
In the new testament era, 'Israel' is actually all the nations settled by all 12 tribes, not just the country known as Israel. We see the 'western' nations, including Israel, being brought down a few notches as of late. The debt banking system along with banking controlled politicians, etc . has weakened those nations and the rival nations, Russia, China have pushed the issue and will continue to do so.
🤗🤗🤗💯💯💯
So what did Paul teach?
"Kings of the earth" to be defeated. M. Should someone know what that means then a hope a mutual relationship can be established. I wouldn't fear old men so long as they remain as such.
❤️ your work Rabbi.
All are created in HIS image. We all should love HIM with our heart, soul, mind, body. HE is HOLY GHOST, incarnate in the body as GSUS, immutable forever. may GSUS quicken your dead spirit & make it holy. Joshua tells us of meeting GSUS before Jericho was conquered. GSUS brings hope the world can't give & the world can't take away
Totally misunderstood dear Rabbi. If you accuse Paul, the highly literate Jew of first century, if you don't understand Paul, you don't understand anything.
I'm pretty sure Paul made up his Damascus Road experience.
Those letters have Bren made up later and altered. And I can show you why.
Looking at some of the ways paul wrote Christianity it seams like paul isn't just talking to Christians but also to jews. While jews don't believe in hell they can believe that christians contribute to good character. Paul explains why the idea of hell is useful even though it's nonsense. Like for example the idea of hell gets rid of the idea of richuals and the purpose behind it. It also helps us think that Gods word can be spread through words rather then metaphors or creation. And when we leave Christianity to become jews we have more value in the thought of no hell and no war.
I have just an observation where you say the gospels (synoptics) have been embellished several times. Of course that is a personal theory that would support your main argument. I expect better from you as such a powerful spokesman.
I'm a Christian and I occasionally watch one of these videos. It might take some time, but I frequently come to realize some problem withwhat Rabbi Singer is saying. I think this is the video where he says that the gospels of the New Testament are always saying that the Jews are bad.
I think that is both false and misleading. The gospels don't say that all Jews are bad. I think they point out particular Jews who do evil. For example, there is the account of Jesus chasing the "money changers" out of the Temple. The gospel does portray that as an evil thing in itself, suggesting that it may have been dishonest as well. On the other hand, various Jewish people in the New Testament are portrayed favorably.
Singer describes John and Paul as people who want to persuade people, particularly Jewish people, to become followers of Christ. In much the same way, Singer is trying to persuade people to drop out of Christianity and to persuade Jews to stay Jewish. Does Singer not try to convince that all Christians are ignorant and foolish, at the least?
Baruch HaShem 🙏🏽✡️🌈
Mr. Tovia why is Christianity worshiping idols, it is forbidden of Moses law?
_"__3:58__ and believe these things __4:00__ as Christianity would develop the __4:03__ beliefs of what Christians uh seized uh __4:08__ as it developed so the story just __4:12__ snowballs and it's becomes more and more __4:15__ embellished"_
Like your speculations on how Christianity came to be without a Resurrection, _you mean?_
9:22 Try to trace one thing in Paul you disagree with to Greco-Roman Paganism ... just one. It's a challenge.
7:08 Even the Mishna is later than all NT books. Not each tractate in it, but their collection.
St. John had no Talmud to refer to, and was himself a great expert on Judaica. As his audience knew.
If he was "known to the High Priests" (a designation reflecting that the office had started to rotate, under impulsion of the Romans), it was probably not as their fishmonger. I don't think fish from lake Genesareth was sold in Jerusalem. It was because he was a priest. Which probably disqualifies him from being the "John" (companion to Peter) mentioned in Acts 4, but not from being the other John, the priest.
The oral Torah is thousands of years older.
Paul 1st century televangelist
Paul was a literary figure portrayed as writing epistles. In tone and subject he is portrayed as if he held the office of Roman Censor...but yet was part of some grassroots Messianic movement....but yet knew all the names of higher ups in Herodian circles. It was satire.
And with the skeletons in the closet.
9:33 _"His interest was power"_
He died decapitated. He was often humiliated. He often took off from people who had received him well and honoured him to people who were going to treat him badly or he couldn't know in advance. Doesn't seem very power hungry to me.
I think at a minimum he was ambitious, he never met Jesus yet even now many Christians just haven't taken that on board. I'm most of his letters he's complaining that they're not doing it how he wants. If he didn't get his way, he was a pain in the ass, which makes me think because of the thorn in his flesh he landed himself in positions in which he humiliated himself.
@@johnmichaelson9173 "not doing what he wants" ... which of the things, on your view, would he have NOT demanded "if he wasn't power hungry"?
@@hglundahl Oh no no no, as I was scrolling down the page I noticed how many comments you'd made, so I'm just not getting involved. Good luck for the future.
@@johnmichaelson9173 Thanks.
I actually would say all the gospels are written in the 2md century.
_"__5:52__ it's very unlikely that John 21 was __5:56__ written by whoever wrote John 20"_
What's the exact problem?
_"it's __5:58__ very unlikely that whoever wrote John 6:01 1-8 mean chapter 1 verse 1 through Verse 6:04 18 also __-orth-__ [wrote the] other part it's possible __6:07__ it's just unlikely"_
Again, what is the exact problem?
"16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works." 2 Timothy 3
" 20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. 21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Spirit" 2 Peter 1
Moses didn't receive the NT.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 "13 And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them? 14 And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you." Exodus 3
"56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad. 57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? 58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am." John 8
@@dancf Keep the 7 Noahide laws and leave Jews alone.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 "16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil." John 3
But you would say that wouldn't you?
5:27 St. Mark is also not denying He was the Son of God who became Man at His conception. It's just that he's not telling the story of that.
Maybe Paul was flavius Josephus? And new testament writers working for the Roman empire?
John and Matthew were with Jesus- what are you talking about??. John said " We've SEEN his glory, the glory of the One and Only who came from the Father full of grace and truth" (John 1:14)
If so, why did it took him 60Yesrs to edit His Revelation? So therefore the rabbi is so right and His opinion is conform to that what Muslims says!
Paul the false prophet!😅
The book of Revelation calls him a false apostle.
Yet Paul himself says that if anyone preaches a different gospel, he is a false prophet. Paul and Jesus taught the same gospel.
2Co 11:4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.
@@RoseSharon7777Where does it say this? Thank you.
@@bubbagumpy978 Deut 13 came first. Paul came later than Jesus. And didn't Jesus tell everyone if someone came saying "he's in the desert" or "he's in the inner room" not to believe them? Isn't that what Paul said? He met Jesus in the desert on the way to Damascus? Who supposedly showed up in the secret chamber? And wasn't it Jesus who stood in the temple and proclaimed "I AM"? I thought we were warned about this? A man would stand in the temple of God as if he was God. These are all the warnings we were told not to be deceived by. Those stories were edited in much later by the Catholic church. False scribes as Jeremiah 8.8 warned as did John. Paul's teachings are mixed with truth and lies. It's up to us to rightly divide truth from lies. Paul himself was proud of his lies that he told. He was arrogant and a narcissist and did not get along with the other apostles because he wanted to teach a different gospel other than what Jesus, John, Peter, and James taught. Especially claiming women had to be quiet in church and cover the heir heads. Pure lies. How can a woman be quite IN the "church" when the church is not a building. And you can't GO TO church to the ven cover your head because we ARE the church. That's how you find errors in the bible. We must establish the logos of truth by 2 or 3 witnesses line upon line precept upon precept. If it contradicts each other then you know there's a problem. And Deut 13 and all the prophets refute the gospel of Paul in many places.
@@RoseSharon7777 You are very misinformed. The KJV has no contradictions from Genesis to Revelations. I can't help or defend what the modern church has done to scripture. Jesus will judge them before He ever judges the Jews. I am not sure what your background is but I think I remember that you are a Noahide. My apologies if I am wrong.
I accept Jesus as the Messiah, but I also follow the commandments of Jesus, which are the commandments of God. That makes me an enemy of the modern church. I would not set foot in a church but I will also not be a Noahide or convert to Judaism.
This applies to all.
Mat_7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
I wanted to apologize for my message the other day. I'm sorry for my undeserved words towards you and my rash judgment. I've been going through some things I don't understand & just a lot of confusion. But that's no excuse.. I genuinely hope my words I had said don't come true, And that you can forgive my foolishness. Sincerely I hope all the best for you, for whatever it's worth.
If you are a Gentile, you need to keep the 7 Noahide laws. Good luck.
Secondly how miracles take place In these religions or is it magic
Couldn’t you say this about the OT also?
You're sitting on the edge of the Rabbit hole, red pill or blue pill? So "say this about the OT also?" Non believers do all the time the two creation stories in Genesis. The Exodus, no evidence. Tower of Babel & the mixing up of the languages, didn't happen. The more you find out the worse it gets. The problem is that Jesus & the disciples were all Torah observant Jews & without the Torah, Tanakh, the NT doesn't have a leg to stand on. Just one example, imagine Christianity without them having hijacked Isaiah!! So like the Rabbi, Jews can & will question the NT but Christians can't question the OT, they just can't get away with any criticism of the OT.