Evolution of the Tanks - Mitsi Studio
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
- Join our RUclips or Patreon membership for early access videos:
/ @mitsistudio
www.patreon.co...
Tanks through time. A fascinating journey of tank evolution and tank power.
In this video, we dive into the dynamic history and incredible evolution of tanks, from their humble beginnings to their modern-day roles on the battlefield.
Store - cool Evolution of the Tanks merchandise:
www.mitsistore....
Join our Discord - Be part of our online community:
/ discord
Follow us on our socials:
Instagram: / mitsi.studio
Website: mitsi.studio/p...
Behance: www.behance.ne...
The voiceover is done by Christian Neale:
www.fiverr.com...
Subscribe to our channel and share our videos.
We appreciate all your support!
Join our RUclips or Patreon Membership for early access videos:
ruclips.net/channel/UCuXCgyOCMXic7j0_wghXnRAjoin
www.patreon.com/user?u=35130109&fan_landing=true&view_as=public
Can you make a video about
Evolution of helicopter?
The crass language...really ? You think you're cool or trying to appeal to a 10 year old demographic ?
wowww the pro-ukrainian stuff at the end really set me off, you clearly know nothing about the conflict, and you seem to not know or care that atleast quarter of your subs do not share your opinion, most of the world does not support Ukraine you know? most of the world's population support Russia, majority Africa, central asia, middle east, parts of south america, parts of the carribean, most of Asia and of course Russia itself, you are really shooting yourself in the foot with this even though Ukraine is losing the war.
@@valyshknee4203 www.economist.com/media-assets/image/20220409_WOT949.png just look at the map...
T-34 Ukrainian tank or Soviet but not russian.
You guys can't just show up every couple of months and drop an absolute masterpiece each time.
I know right!?
I totally agree with you 👍🏾
real
And yet, they do! Like fucking Call of Duty!
real
Im surprised how they can make something so terrifying used in quite a lot of wars look so cartoonish.
Yea, that Mark I tank kinda cute tho😂
War is a game. Yet people still play it
Viva lé France, Napoléon
Tanks are not terrifying they are cool
@@retrogamer545well the enemy will be terrified
A shame that the FT-17 wasn't mentioned considering how it was the first tank that looked like what we think of as a tank. All the same though, this is really awesome, and I hope to see more of this in the future.
Yep, I agree, FT-17 set the benchmark for all modern tanks to come, and it was a superb light tank of the period too. Plus it's soo damn Cute! I just want to hug it and pet it on the turret, such a good boy.
it was the first mass produst turret tank but lil willy did have a turret.but yay why no ft17.
It is a very, very watered down history of the tank.
I mean the FT-17 was the first to have been set up like the modern tanks we know. Surely didn't look like it, however the driver front, combat center and engine back was pioneered by the FT-17
they also forgot about the austrian "Burstyn Motorgeschütz" from 1911/12
It was even designed for crossing trenches and had a rotatable turret. In my eyes the only true first tank
I love how he is so educational yet still say stuff like "They can copy and paste tank name strait from ww2 like it a fucking call of duty game" GOD I love them. keep up the good work.
You guys need to publish an RTS game using these models as assets. I would play the hell out of this.
Same, I love rts game especially modern military ones
or make model kits of them, that would be amazing
@@nozzatron01gaming11oooooh 3d printer time lol 😂
I think in their patreon have models of things used to people who want to print them, not sure
nice idea
Great video. But kinda sad that the Renault FT-17 wasn't mentioned here. It's the first tank to have a rotating turret. Can't imagine how modern tanks would look like without it.
And not only that, it was also the most produced tank from the Great War, 3700 of them, that's more than the Germans and Brits combined.
Another thing they missed, Czechoslovakia had a decent tank production just before the war, the Germans used quite a lot of Panzer 35(t)'s and 38(t)'s well into 1941 until their own tank production finally caught up!
It's the father of modern tanks, as you said it had a rotating turret but it also had a compartment specially for the engine.
@@_MaitreuPanda___ carbon monoxide poisoning was a serious issue in the early tanks.
Couldn't agree more. It set the standard for most tanks put into service: A fully rotating turret; driver in the front, fighting compartment in the middle and engine compartment in the rear. Absolute unit of a little tank.
Not surprising, this channel is anti-french for some reason
They can make a game with this style, and I'd buy it.
Advanced Wars on the Gameboy. Good times.
Deep inside we like cartoonish art style even in our 20s
Same man it looks awesome.
Hell yeah!
Same Thought it has Potential.
8:16 I mean, we still call our air force "Luftwaffe".
Naja es ist was es ist. Luftwaffen. halt außerdem wurde im Video der KF51 gezeigt und nicht ein "Panther" was das nazi Deutschland namen kopieren jetzt auch nicht sinnvoll macht
It's just air force in German 😂
"Luftstreitkräfte" wohl eher
die der Luftwaffe
Actually, the replaceability of the M4 was quite comforting to Allied tank crews as it was the American Sherman that was over engineered, particularly in service to maximizing crew survivability. Anecdotally, there was one particular crew that ended up losing 3 tanks to enemy action, only to return to base to pick up a new tank each time.
Only 2500 Sherman crew died in WW2. It has the best crew survival rates. The T34 was unreliable and killed it's crew. Probably the second most overrated tank ever after the Tiger. At the end of the day trained tankers are the most precious resource in armored warfare, the tank that protects that best is the best tank.
Especially since T-34s usually don't have spall liners the whole WW2, a non-penetrating shot for a Sherman is a very deadly metal shatter to T-34 crews. Soviet crews were relatively expendable since they are easily replaced anyway.
Just compare the numbers
The Eastern Front had 6 million Germans and 9 million Soviet soldiers over the course of 4 years
The United States had and the Allies landed 300 thousand soldiers in Normandy. At the same time, the operation was clearly planned by a member of the Kuklusklan movement
I've heard one British tank vet say that he was in his 5th tank when WW2 ended.
He also said the British didn't get a decent tank until *_after_* the war.
@@duitkreminder that the Soviets put the fuel tanks in the fighting compartment to either side of the driver, which is less then ideal when you get hit
I was hoping for the french tanks to be mentioned like the Renault FT that was a game changer to ww1 that after the war, many nations learned from the Renault's design as it serves the basics of tank designs
Don t expect to much of a channel that potrayed us as coward in a different video
French bashing is still a thing twenty years after iraq
@@aurelienthietard7636 hahaha
With just how much it gets wrong I'm not suprised. Like how it never touches on the long barrel revolution and it mentions the importance whilst degrading the very tanks which inspired it. Or how it quite litterally makes it look like the maus was anything more than 2 prototypes and actually saw service (neither of which is true and if we compare it to other german prototype programs it's obvious how little attention it was given). Or how it perpetuates myths about german manufacturing (which is sad because the importance of allied bombings and the supply situation almost never gets stated)
Honestly I might have to do a full writeup.
The 2c bis and charmond too
It's crazy, he completely swept the French subject...
The Sherman was one of the easiest tanks to escape from uninjured if it was destroyed, so that was of great comfort to the crews.
Adding the fact that is bassicaly like a limousine for the crew considering the standard of the time
That’s one of the reasons why Soviet tankers who had Shermans preferred it over the T-34.
Yep, but it use very inflamable fuel and the shell compartment where not very well protected. Not for nothing that one of the sherman nickname was bronson. Shermans was just super easy to blew up.
@gaetantreib4163 early shermans were prone to becoming bonfires however 1943 onward they were just as likely to set alight as another tank.
@@gaetantreib4163 isnt its called "Ronson" not "Bronson" also that is only used post war.
Also sherman is not that easy to blew up, study says they have similar explosion rate to other tanks of similar class or size at the time (Except the one british used as they have the brightest idea to overload the tank with ammo and still wonder why their tanks explosing everywhere) even an account from Russian that have Hero of the Soviet honor that use Sherman says he was pinned down while using his Sherman once from german attacks but his Sherman survives despite receiving multiple hits.
I absolutely need a tank game with this kind of style, commentary and all
Also im glad you pointed out the panther naming thing cuz i find it really weird, hopefully this version doesnt have any reliability issues lmao
there was a game like this, but dont know the name anymore.
@@mr.flupsurf2860shield wall
Its honestly amazing how much effort we put into destroying eachother.
You can bet when someone invents something new, some prick will pop up next to them asking two questions;
1. How can we kill people with this?
2. How can this help to make things more comfortable for the lives of MY people who are going out to kill OTHER people?
Its a bit more natural than you think
The key is to put more effort into killing your enemy than your enemy is putting into killing you.
Well, simply put, if the other guy has a sharp stick, then you need a sharp rock on a stick, because otherwise he can come over and steal your stuff.
Humans can operate well in groups, but groups rarely work together if it's not against something else.
@@WG55I’d argue the key is to put in more effort in the factory so the guys in the field put in none.
Wish you guys had mentioned the Centurion being the first MBT, and the FT-17 for basically defining what the modern tank should look like and function.
Согласен, странно что ещё Леклерк не упомянули. Самый технологичный танк запада того времени.
Первый ОБТ - советский Т-64
@@alexeievgenievich5556 Первым основным боевым танком мог стать "Центурион" или "Пантера".
@@petrf-rw4pwcenturion was made 1946
@@petrf-rw4pwthat’s not even the first soviet MBT bro
Im quite disappointed that they failed to mention the Rennault tank the French were fielding during WW1. Their design basically inspired future tank designs in the following years of history.
Edit: Eyyy why people fighting in my comments?
The author hates French and russians
The animation is gold, however the writting is really, really bad. It feels like they copy & pasted some biased british/american article, inserted some old myths and as you said above, completely forgot about the really important designs like the FT-17, T-55 and the introduction of ERAs.
they post like every month, if you aren't satisfied with it why are you watching em? if you want those many tanks watch a full tank documentary telling all the tanks in history, they aren't national geographic.
Yep, they even forgot to mention that the French had superior tanks during the start of WW2 but didn't know how to incorporate them in their armed forces.
@@TrafficTheConeyou not aloud to have a opinion ? He was not criticizing it he was just saying his opinion
Как же иронично весь этот нахрюк на бэбрамсы выглядит в свете недавних событий
без нахрюка никуда, всё таки хорошо что у них есть только мультики
Читаешь мысли) Ток хотел про этот анимационный высер написать...
Не, ну про отлетающие башни, превратившиеся в доп. артиллерию реально смешно.
@@montecarlo2684 Смешно будет нам, когда ты гавно будешь 5ый угол искать после захода Русских в Авдеевку.
Ну, вот такая у них пропаганда...
05:18 "you can barbaross all the way back to where you came from"💀💀💀
What does Barbaross mean?
@@D4v1dWasTaken It was Operation Barbarossa which the Germans had launched against the Soviet Union in WW2 ~1941
@@D4v1dWasTaken The Barbarossa plan was the Germans' plan to capture the USSR in a few weeks, but the war dragged on
I really like the styling of these videos! After watching, I think some other tanks should have been mentioned such as:
- Vezdekhod (First motorised armoured tank prototype)
- Renault FT tank (First tank to have a fully rotating turret)
- Char 2C (Largest operational tank)
Isnt the tsar tank the biggest operational tank?
@@Herr_Jäger I don't even know if that even classifies as a tank 🤣
@@federovsquared5646 Everyone else calls it a tank 🤷♂️
@@Herr_Jäger Probably because calling it an armoured fighting vehicle is too long of a name.
The Renault FT-17 is mentioned in the World War I video.
“Yes you can leave a comment”
“And no we will not read it”
Lmaoo😂
война на Украине показала что леопард не может воевать довольно долго на поле боя, так же как и абрамс, которого с первого выстрела уничтожил т-72б3
Абрамс: 😭😡
Т-72б3: 🗿🤫
Абрамс и Леопард не предназначены для этого поля боя - они предназначены для твердой поверхности и открытой местности, где они могут использовать высокую скорость, хорошие приборы обзора и прицеливания, и самое главное - поддержку авиацией и артиллерией, и всем возможным. А на Украине - зыбкая почва и деревья - они проваливаются и не могут использовать свою оптику максимально эффективно, а поддержки у них вообще никакой нет. И экипажи на них не обучены - управлять танком можно научиться очень быстро, но вот вести бой - это нужны годы обучения.
Абрамс и леопард когда в них попал снаряд т 90 😢😢😢😔😡🤬😖🤕🤕♨️🎆🎇
I’m sad you guys didn’t mention one of the best tanks from WW1 (and my personal favorite) the French FT-17 Rennault, it was one of the first tanks that looked like a modern tank (outward treads, single barrel on a turret that was either a 8mm machine gun or a 37mm cannon), and one of the first mass produced tanks, but nevertheless great video!
I think you made a mistake. The Renault was armed with either a single barrel cannon or a machine gun. We hadn’t really figured out how to put those two together at the time, and it’s not like there was enough space in the turret anyway.
@@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 Thank you for pointing that out, I had meant to say that but I forgot to fix that line of text when I rewrote this like 5 times, I’ll fix it now
afterwards, I think Mitsi doesn't like French, given the treatment they had in previous videos
@@CascouPrime In which video ? It's a real shame, if for such a reason, they didn't mention France at all in this video. I mean that country is kinda a pioneer in tank developpement.
@@adddaddda7748 in the video where they prtray how different countries fight, France shows up and instead of... idk Napoleon's grand armee, or ww1 french soldiers, or hell even the french resistance in 1940, they just showed a stereotypical french dude waving a white flag at the first sign of trouble. I wasn't surprised afterwards that the FT wasn't even mentionned in this video considering the previous french bashing...
With Mitsi, you are guaranteed to learn something new while cracking up laughing.
3:54 ... Definitely. XD
And enjoying US propaganda :D
Good video but it's sad that France isn't mentioned when it was the first country to develop a "modern tank" with 360° turret and tracks, the succesful Renault FT-17. We had pretty nice design during the WWII and the Cold War too (B1 bis, AMX 13,...)
FT is a critical development. Oscilating turrets can go straight to hell though
it's not a bad turret configuration
the question is Why did we built Oscilation turrets?
Oscilating turrets have his advantages like placement saver, smaller size and could on certain tanks equipped with autoloader so on lighter tanks ist an absolute monster killer (see the ebr in WT annoying)
but on heavy tanks in another hand is pointless, poor elevation degrees
@@latch9781
@@latch9781Oscillating turrets were the best design at that time, plus the French did come up with other amazing things during that time. In my opinion Amx 30 is also a superior counterpart than the German leopard 1.
@@latch9781Oscillating turrets wonky asf
@@latch9781 Oscilating turrets were amazing, not by the design neither armor protection (which was not really good), but because they were the consequences of a really fast automatic reloading system.
Задача 1:сказать что хоть у ссср и страшнейшие танки были,все же они были не лучше м4 - выполнено
Задача 2:сказать какой абрамс ахуенный и т 90 шляпа - выполнено
Байден гордится выполненной вами задачей,вам выдается 3 грамма легальной наркоты и литр нефти!
How long have you guys been in the animation industry? This just feels extremely professional and well done. The details, everything having personality, effort spent everywhere not just on key stuff. It's really impressive, makes me think you guys will have a really good run over time.
Watch their introduction video about themselves
3 years
Tanks won't be obsolete, it'll adapt and improve over the years just like infantry and perhaps aircraft. People have said that since World War 1 yet main battle tanks are still relevant in the modern battlefield, albeit with improvements and newer technology.
It's just that Russia doesn't know how to use Soviet tanks. The KF-51 tank can smoke both tank and drone on the bbq.
@@WolfeSaber9933 Training is also key. Yes, your statement is somewhat correct.
@@WolfeSaber9933Its not only that, but people seem to think that just because tanks are being destroyed that makes them obsolete. Engines of war will be destroyed in the course of their use just by being Engines of war. Doesnt matter what it is.
@@WolfeSaber9933 now they do, they didn't in the begining of the war
@@whispofwords2590 B-b-but MY countries MBT that isn't in Ukraine and has never saw combat against a conventional army would do SO much better guys, it has all these better traits, trust me!
Thanks!
Once again, a great piece.
Bravo, Mitsi !!!
Awesome!!!
u wrong Italian tanks are the best
Edit: I love it when I make stupid nonsense statements, people dumber than my comment come along to attack something so obvious. Xdddd
@@darkleaf5167The only thing better about Italian tanks is that the reverse is faster than forward.
@@ApacheBruvAnd smoll look cute
@@mitsistudiocan you do magic? I kinda want sword and magic
He fails to mention that the Abrams was also in Ukraine, and they are doing a hell of a lot worse than the Leopards.
Eh, this video was uploaded waaaaay before the Abrams tanks were deployed in Ukraine, cut the makers some slack.
@@mekingtiger9095 then don't make stupid assumptions or try to predict things about the war if they want to be cut some slack
The authors did not forget to lick the US tanks 👎, the Shermans were burning then - especially against the Tigers, and now the Abrams are burning in Ukraine.
@@Zloy_moskovit abrams doing fine
@@spudgun3982thank you for spreading truth my friend
You forgot to mention Jan Zizka, the Bohemian leader who was the first to successfully use war wagons as battle tanks to face the entire Holy Roman Empire armies without losing a single battle during the Hussite Wars.
Bohemia would might not survive the russo ukrainian war
If it still existed ofc or uh survive by improving their tanks and smart soldiers
Or that dude with the elephants.
he cant show every tank that was shown to humans, its not a documentary
8:29 I agree and like how the way you tell that Ukraine were indeed just a giant testing ground
He haven't said that. He says that countries are also using ruzzian invasion to test their weapons. Which is nothing new and has nothing to do with the reason the war started.
@@localhost0 Ukrainian brainwashed kid don't cry because Russia is winning 🗿🍷
I'm surprised the Centurion didn't get a mention, nor the Challenger 2.
Good video, love the art style. Keep it up!
Or the Renault FT.
morser karl or shwerer gustav
Also, Little Willie never went to France and the A7V could fall over 🤣🤣🤣
@@arrowoneomega4649those aren't tanks, they're artillery
I thought that as well, re Centurion and Challenger series
Уже увидели леопард и Абрамс, горят очень даже хорошо!
Очень хорошо горят
Да
@@jokerkot4759you mean be shot by 1 round and not burn?
@@OmarGarcia-kr4jz у нас хотя бы танки не гроб
5:44 is my favorite part. That fading of the foreground to highlight the flying tank killed me
По задумке, эти танки должны были доставляться на транспортных самолётах в тыл немецких войск и объеденившись с силами ополчения СССР - "партизанами" наносить удары по немецким линиям снабжения, держу вкурсе
It's disgraceful they didn't mention the most powerful tank of WW2, the Bob Semple.
Viva le France
Me attempting to find the funny
Made of the strongest armor and weapons
It's armor looked like simple corrugated iron, but was actually made of a secret material known as New-Zealandium!
The main gun could kill any human, and it was equipped with many of them. That's horrible😱
"Wonder how the Leopards are doing"
Let me give you a demonstration
Landmine: Kaboom?
Russians: Yes Rico, Kaboom
Not to mention that Ukraine also uses Russian tanks so it’s not the tank that is performing poorly…
Как как поведут Леопарды и Абрамсы? Так же отлично горят.
Ну, не показывать же это в пропагандистском ролике...
Т90 лучше горит)))
5:55 sure it can bitch slap mines, but it can also become a warcrime device when your out of ammo :)
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
T H E B O D I E S W E R E M A N G L E D B E Y O N D R E C O G N I T I O N.
OH NAH YOU WILD FOR THIS ONE
Shame they didn't mention French tanks as the Renault FT changed the conception of tanks for the end of WW1 and WW2.
For those wondering it had the 1st turret that could rotate and needed only 2 soldiers to operate. It is considered as the 1st "modern" tank
Or the FCM 2C that needed 13 soldiers to operate but was a slow monster
They didnt even mention the french as tank makers XD, so sad...
3:59 damn they’re being perfectly honest about it
7:06 was the funniest scene😂
5:56 “you had a crab Sherman used to bitch slap mines into the air” 😂😂😂😂
3:55
The reason why Japan and Italy were not good at building tank was that they were facing different enemies. In the 1930s and before WW2, both Japan and Italy were against relatively weaker countries. In the 1930s, Japan was against Chinese who did not have enough explosives or tanks to destroy Japanese tanks. Italy was against Ethiopian who also did not have enough explosives or tanks to destroy Italian tanks. Because of these, both countries did not feel the necessity to build more durable and powerful tanks because their light tanks were enough to against pre-WW2 enemies. While, the UK, US, USSR, and Germany had to build more durable and powerful tanks to defeat powerful enemies who were euqal foe each other.
Moreover, there were some limitations in production, and engineering. Major powerful countries of WW2 had enough production capacity and engineering. While, Japan were lack at production capacity and engineering, and Italy was lack at production capacity.
To also follow up Italy was expecting combat in mountain terrain(but ended up in the desert) and the Japanese were fighting in island jungle thus lightweight/easy to maneuver tanks made more sense than heavy armored tanks, also the Japanese was aiming for a naval victory thus Battleships Aircraft Carriers and Torpedoes were prioritized over tanks.
Plus the Japanese tanks usually were required to be able to perform amphibious landings or at least brought on shore by a smaller landing craft, which limited their weight and therefore armor and gun caliber
japan just had bad tank designs lol
Makes sense, explains a lot
Japan was building ships so they couldnt build as much tanks
It's a shame that not a single French tank has been mentioned, not even the FT 17 which is the father of French tanks
It's not the father of French tanks in fact there was other before it but it is the father of modern tanks with a 360° turret and an engine in the back but you are right tho there should have been at least one French tanks since they were some of the biggest designer of those
If you guys would ever make strategy game (CoH style like of base building and such) I would buy it in 100%. The style is so fun to watch.
Best animation studio I have watched in a long while.
@@jzsbff4801 fully agree
@jzsbff4801 I love how they just slapped the swastika right in your face not giving any craps about demonitization
4:46 my guy was poppin' wheelies while in tank while dunkin' on Germans 😂😂😂😂
Didn't expect that splat at 2:27 . Brutal
i love this animation style so much, it takes a dark truth and turns it into something funny and sort of cute with the colors and little round soldiers lol
With the effort of animation and content put into every single video. This channel is so much way underrated and deserves so much more
2:20
Standing in a line of fire
32 will lead the way
Coming over the trench and wire
Going through endless grey
4:14
We are the Panzer Elite
Born to compete
Never retreat
5:00
Into the Motherland the German Army marched
Comrades stand side by side to stop the Nazi charge
7:30
Death in the shape of Panzer Battallion
Insect of terror, don't run
Face your fate like a man
Sabaton 😎😎😎
SABATON!
Ah, a man of culture.
Basically the entire video: Steel commanders rule the battlefield
@@szaboaron8966spearhead flanders, tankers leading the storm of panzers
I love this Studio so much because of how quick it pumps out new content we get to love and enjoy 🙏🙏🙏
"quick" lol (not that I have a problem with a video a month)
@@itsamefroggie yeah its not quick at all but the animation and research done for the videos aswell as how long they are is well worth the wait👍
You can probably Barbarossa your way out of there 5:16
BEST LINE XD
Now that we had tanks, maybe the evolution of battleships ? xD
With like the ships of the line at the start, then the monitors, dreadnoughts etc... And finally to finish with the Iowa and Yamato :3
It would be interesting I think ^^
And great video of course, as always ^^
Heck, it could even cover the Iowa's conversion, and potentially some of the future concepts of a 'battleship' (I.e a bigass ship containing hundreds of VLS launchers)
@@amhuman5138 Ah yeah, didn't thought about the future of battleships (and why it has been raplaced by aircraft carrier too ^^')
@@debilus7921Yeah, that's a good one too.
@@amhuman5138either that or they gonna use railguns when they become available
5:05 T-34 really just said "siuuu" 💀💀💀
Now I can’t unhear it💀💀💀💀
i hear the loud moaning meme 😭
I'm from Russia🇷🇺, I wanted to mention the СССР T34 tank made of concrete. Russian T14 „Армата” tanks do not participate in the war due to engine problems and complete secrecy. Peace above everyone's heads.
First time viewer, long time tank fan; it’s honestly amazing how they’re able to get CG to look almost exactly like filmed claymation
I absolutely adore the animation style and the writing for this. Streamlined and adult to keep my attention
Soviet tanks were designed to break through the defenses of NATO countries, they had to withstand pontoons, they had to be armored and be able to shoot on the move without stopping, For this Soviet designers went to reduce the armor space and installed a loading mechanism on T-64, T-72, T-80 tanks.
the NATO countries took a different path, and took the German concept of powerful guns, strong armor and maximum comfort for the crew as a new one. This increases the rate of fire during ambush shooting, but during offensive actions, the rate of fire drops noticeably, besides, the downside is the monstrous size of NATO tanks, which are almost a meter higher than the Soviet ones.
The offensive in Zaporozhye revealed the above-described shortcomings of NATO tanks, besides the German Leopard 2 are limited in the use of high-explosive shells, which were not originally envisaged.
While an autoloader is pretty good its also unnecessary when you can simplify your tank design and just simply train someone to handle the pressure and reload as fast or even faster then an autoloader
Sound every logical
The entire point of NATO tanks is crew survivability, which is demonstrated to be superior, no Leopard in Ukraine has tossed it's turret. Also the Leopard 2 variants Ukraine has are old, and the Leopard is not the best NATO tank either, it's protection is not as good as the Challenger or Abrams. This was shown in Syria where Turkey did lose some leopards that tossed their turrets, this is because of where the leopard stores secondary ammo. The Abrams has never tossed it's turret, neither has the Challenger 2 but those just have not seen as much combat as the Abrams and Leopard.
@@duitk You are wrong about the flight of the turret at Abrams, there is a video on RUclips where this is captured. It is also worth considering (the same answer to the comment above) that each crew member increases the necessary amount of armor for their protection, on T-64/T-72/T-80 tanks there are only three crew members: the driver, the gunner and the commander. In NATO tanks, a loader is added to them, which charges projectiles standing up, which requires space and, accordingly, an increase in the mass and height of the tank. It is also worth adding that high-explosive shells, which were transferred to the stern niche of the turret on the T-90M, lead to the explosion of ammunition.
I mean...if the Ukraine war has taught us anything its that Russian Tanks are just Terrible
bro doesn’t even know that abrams was oneshotted and noscoped by T-72
And how many T-72s have died to one shot again? In how many ways?
That makes me wonder why we even bother with tank armor at all nowadays.
never happened lol
@@mekingtiger9095 we do bother. No Abrams has been destroyed by a T72.
@@adrian4596 Has any T-72 ever had the chance to fire at an Abrams to begin with?
Not every German tank was over-engineered and produced in small numbers. The StuGIII was the most produced German tank because it was very cheap and efficient. The reason why German tanks kept getting bigger was, that initially this strategy was very successful. The Tiger 1 was the first heavy tank and had no opponents. But at a certain point, size becomes a disadvantage. So this strategy didn't work anymore. If you compare numbers then you also have to consider the economic strength of the countries.
Minor Correction: Heavy tanks like the Tiger never technically stopped working, so much as they became tactically redundant decades later. The US and USSR both adopted version of their own during the Cold War.
Germany's issues during WW2 largely stem from its resource poverty. It never had the fuel reserves to function as a modern mechanized army in the way that the US, UK and USSR did.
So, I guess they kinda did stop working, but in a more literal sense than you seem to imply.
@@Kingfisher_2376The key to German heavy tanks was reliable logistics and maintenance. A dedicated tank regiment with excellent radio based coordination and proper support was expected to punch through the enemy lines and wreak havoc whilst mechanised and motorised troops followed up.
This is a doctrine that is still used to this day, but what Germany suffered in WW2 was the horrible state of their logistics. Not only they had sabotaged production lines and faulty supply points, their comms were also tapped in late war meaning that any and all moves they made were known to their enemies.
Also, the lost of air power was one of the biggest damnings to happen to them. With the threat of getting annihilated from above, german armour was unable to play any active roles during daytime and had to move under the cover of darkness.
The last bit may also be where the term 'Army of the Night' became popularised from.
The Tiger 1 was a good heavy tank but it was too heavy and over engineered compared the sherman or t34.
Plus, as early as Kursk the Soviets had devised ways to kill or disable Tigers.
Anti tank trenches, anti tank mines, new Ptab anti tank bomblets dropped by Il-2s, and positioning t34s, anti tank guns and spgs into positions where they could shoot Tigers in the much thinner side or rear armor.
Also, don't forget that after Kursk things like the Sherman firefly, Sherman 76, M36 jackson, Su-85, Su-100, Isu-122 and Is-2s started rolling onto the battlefield.
Also also, the germans forgot to provide enough recovery vehicles in the event a tiger was disabled or broke down.
Bastante errónea tu información, es sabido que en EEUU y Europa están borrando la historia pero te aviso que el Tiger I no fue el primer tanque pesado, fuera de modelos prototipos, el primero en producirse en números decentes fueron los modelos KV rusos, los cuales para inicio de Barbarroja no tenían rival y solo un cañón antitanque de 88 o un bombardero eran capaces de neutralizarlos (La película estadounidense "Fury", esta basada en la historia real de como un solitario KV-1 fue capaz de frenar toda una división panzer por su cuenta y tras destruir todos los cañones de 88 que los alemanes poseían, fue destruido junto con su tripulación por unidades de granaderos) y el Tiger I fue la respuesta a los KV 1 y 2 soviéticos.
@@generalhorse493the tiger wasnt t 34 or m4 sherman. It had a designated role as a breakthrough tank, such as no medium tank wouldnt be enough to replace it
8:20 lmao
All i want in life is to be as happy as the cowboy at 7:19
Cuanto sesgo político quieres en tu video?
Mitsi Studio: si
7:45 - *listens carefully* Wait is that... Red Al- No.... Yes. Yes it is. Don't know how you got around the copyright, but hey good call.
I’m disappointed the French tanks aren’t portrayed when they was innovative and effectives the FT17 literally created the true design of tanks and ww2 French tanks where also the best of their time ( but they had problems of doctrines and high commands )
Yup not sure how France wasn't one of the main tank producing nations. They certainly produced more and more capable tanks than the Japanese or Italians that's for certain. The Chars were impressive tanks, just sadly the French army was stuck in WW1 mode.
@@stephen4121 France had a pretty big anti war sentiment during the interwar. So why would we have produced massive quantitities of tank that we wouldn’t have needed in an ideal world ? And by the time we realised we needed more tanks, it was too late anyway.
One of said chars, the B1-bis had been in development since 1920. Very much stuck as a WW1 type of design. And intended to be used in a trench war scenario. It was still a nightmare for every german unlucky enough to encounter one during the short lived conflict.
The only counter for the B1-bis the german had at the during the rather short war against my country was the 88mm anti air gun, whose effectiveness as an anti tank weapon was only discovered by pure accident. Probably a gun crew saw a B1 approaching, panicked, pointed the gun at the tank in desperation and fired.
In terms of effectiveness, think about this: At one point, a single B1 tore apart a small german armored column. 13 tanks destroyed in a single engagement. And not a single penetrating german shot out of the dozens that hit the aforementioned B1.
They were so good the germans salvaged the ones they could, and stuck a flamethrower where the 75mm was. You know, for extra nastiness. And then threw those at the soviets.
To quote a comic about it, it was a « slug with enough armour to pass as a swiss safe, and with sharp teeth ». Comic is named « The butcher of Stonne », if you are interested.
@@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 B1 Bis wasn't developped in 1920'. The "Char de Bataille" trials was in 1924, and the B1 was develloped from its contestants in the beginning of the 30', it wasn't made to reach trenches, but instead to assault fortifications like the Siegfried line and to be used as support for the Maginot Line guns.
France also producted more than 1000 infantry tank in 1940 and 500 cavalry tanks, along side many armored cars
"Maybe later we'll see how the German leopard tank will perform"
This has definitely aged nicely.
They certainly make good target practice
@@UnknownLord711
like every tank without any infantry
This idea that Russian tanks are target practice is a meme being circulated by Nafo bots! Incompetent armored commanders on both sides in Ukraine are manufacturing tank graveyards by putting their men in the crosshairs of enemy aviation or artillery. But both sides are also proving that tanks aren’t obsolete when used correctly! The Ukrainians in particular are currently experiencing a nightmare scenario of repeated defeats on the frontlines, combined with powerful allies and financial backers that falsely believe their side is winning. Ukraine is receiving all the armor it could ever ask for but the question is whether it’ll all be a waste!
@@IsaiahRichards692 i was talking about the Leopard 2’s
@@IsaiahRichards692
U sound like a pro russian
American engineer: what should we name the ta-
American engineer: Sherman
American engineer: but we already have like 20k of th-
American engineer: *sherman*
T(h)ank you Mitsi! Top quality content as always! T(h)anks! 💥
6:04 had me dead for some reason
6:57: That thing looks like it can wreck a giant.
Видно, что автор политически на стороне бандеровского правительства, учитывая, что Т-34 был проще и легче ремонтировался в отличии от Шермана, а современные модели Абрамса весят сейчас как чертов Pz - VII, Королевский тигр рукоплескал бы со слезами на глазах. Современные русские танки до сих пор сохраняют задел на простоту, удобство в ремонте и надёжность, а отрыв башни, это сначала надо попасть, да и если бк расстрелян, то опасность отсутствует. Типичная пропаганда с искажением фактов.
та буд-то леоперди а бабрамси вежі не метають XD
Скоро все абрамсы в Украине будут гореть
The Bob Semple Tank would be a interesting variant too. Great video!
*Panzerlied starts playing*
Ob Stürmt oder schneit
Ob die sonne uns lacht
Der Tag glühend heiß
Oder eiskalt die Nacht.
Are you from indonesia?
Verstaubt sind die Gesichter,
Doch froh ist unser Sinn,
Es braust unser Panzer
Im Sturmwind dahin
-3 abrams
4
@@ВинниПух-у5п, 6
5
You forgot to tell about french tanks who introduced a lot of new technologie before the WWII, like during the great war with the renault ft 17, it was far more eficient than other tanks, to big and slow, and the b1 bis who were facing easely german tanks at the begining of WWII, the only problem were the use of and the sabotage in production.
they will never do that XD this channel is part of the stupid french-bashing clan ... they just act like they're an history channel lol
Indeed
Good video but I feel France deserves recognition for the Renault FT or Britain for the Centurion being the first MBT a little before the Soviets introduced the T-54/55 (the latter being built as a tank for for the cold war and potential nuclear conditions as they were intended to keep crews safe from fallout.)
Good video, but the MAUS and Ratte took up screen time that should have gone to good and influential tanks that were actually used, or even "The Panzer IV, III AND V, as iconic weapons that you had a chance to see more than once in a lifetime before the advent of the internet." Im subscribing though, this is enjoyable content.
The Soviet March at the end of the video was absolute perfection
i noticed it instantly because i listen to it on repeat 😭
8:28
Forgot to mention the FT-17, the first tank with a rotating turret
Ikr
Seeing that it is coming out soon got me really excited cause of the top quality animation you guys do keep up the work
Not wanna be thsth guy, but 1 horse is capable for 15 hp if you compair it to a emgine, a human is 4,3 hp. Your welcomed😊
This time you guys should make "Evolution of Planes" or "Evolution of Submarines". But anyways, every video you make is such a masterpiece. Will wait for the next one
"We would see leopard 2 perform"💀
You mean graveyard for 4 Mykolas?
man its biased asf, abrams are burning in ukraine rn
i love these animations there so well put together i remember when How Countries Fight Their Wars popped up in my recommended 3 years ago I'm happy to see more animations being uploaded again there pure gold and the commentary tops it off
damn, it made me smile when I saw how Abrams lifted the gun turning the turret around the hull, because the engine bulging from above the stern of the M1 physically prevents Abrams from shooting from the stern
Well, I guess the question about the Leopard’s performance has been well answered during the last month 😂😂
Same could be said about the M1 Abrams in the Saudi Arabian military.
Seems to be more related to the experience of the tank crew and the doctrine that is being followed.
Yeah. High survivability even after multiple hits and every crew survived. Literal free advertisement for western tanks. However, bad usage from Ukrainians. Won’t say they are complete idiots though they did organised a decent retreat but the usage of leopard tanks is dumb.
Same with the French AMX-10 RC, seems more like unfamiliarity with the equipment that's causing issues.
Though I wouldn't wish to be a Ukrainian logistics officer.
@@concernedimperialguardsman993now bring that same energy when discussing Russian tanks
8:10 And we saw! **Footage of blown turrets of leopard tanks in Ukraine**
Abrams also flies off in the new addition
turrets blowing off leopards is a rare sight unlike russians they dont store ammo right under the turret ring
@@Space_Muffin45
If you don't understand russian, use Google translate
Потому что в русских танках все делает автомат заряжания, а в американских голодный негр Джимми. И посреди боя Джимми могут ранить, контузить или убить. Или он может устать. Снаряды- то тяжёлые. А автомат заряжания всегда одинаково быстр.
Как вы правильно отметили, башни наших танков подлетают вверх от любого пробития в башню. Но давайте будем честны. Если снаряд пробил башню - экипаж погиб. Что в Абрамс, что в т90.
И да. Один Абрамс может быть лучше одного т90. Но у России танков все ещё в несколько раз больше, чем у остального мира.
А, кстати ваши абрамсы и челенджеры немного тяжёлые. И застревают в украинской грязи. А ещё они больше и заметнее танков РФ.
@@ellez0ne No they dont. Its funny cus the interior is immaculate while the exterior looks like it was shit out the backend.
The perfect video that could have been sponsored by world of tanks.
I was expecting one but i was deeply dissapointed
1 German tank was better then 10 American tanks, but the Americans always had 11
Technically it was 1 panzer = 5 Sherman’s but they had six sorry for being 🤓👆
if they showed how to drive Russian tanks burning in Ukraine, why didn't they show the destroyed leopards?
Possibly because this video was finished before .
¡Gracias!
Awesome!!!
Khohol?
20 mexican dollars
@@mitsistudio do m4a3e2 sherman and kv-2
8:10 damn that aged like a milk
6:24 M A U S
M A U S(chan)
I actually quite like the fact that they brought back the Panther name for one of their tanks; Germany's naming schedule makes it immediately known whos tank it is, and they have always used predatory feline animals for their tank names. To bring back the Panther is an honor to the tank that came before it and the crews that manned it, regardless of what government used it.
It's nevertheless unfortunate that they chose the name of a tank that was activly used by the Nazis during WW2, especially if you consider that there are other "predatory feline animals" whose names could have been used. Löwe (Lion) was the name of an experiemental design during WW2, while Jaguar (both the same in English and German, so a huge plus) wasn't used as a name for a tank during WW2 at all. Looking at all these facts, the decision to reuse the name "Panther" looks odd at best. Considering that Germany is currently again frowned upon for taking a leading role in Europe, it's downright distasteful - and I say that as a German.
@@EllroyMcBong Ah yes, the brainwashing of Germans to not take pride in anything they do comes into full effect. Theres nothing wrong with taking pride in certain aspects of your history, especially small things like the performance and name of a tank. No one is telling you to strap on hugo boss and goose step around the parade square, but an acknowledgement of German tank design history is not distasteful.
It's just surprising they'd want to reuse the name. I see nothing wrong with it, but the German government is pretty touchy about WW2.
@@EllroyMcBongyour defeatist mindset is at it again hm?
@@jacqirius It seems to me that you don't know the meaning of the word "defeatist". Should you look it up, please also look up the term "Wehrboo". I'm fairly sure that you will read that word quite often in the future regarding you as a person.
4:59
medic: were his legs?
doctor: were his face?
medic: found it
doctor: were?
medic: um in the field over there
doc: ..... yeah 100% dead
It's sad that you missed the Renault ft17, Challengers, T26, Type 10, ztz99 etc. These tanks also had their own stories to tell!!!
we get it, you play war thunder
@@thechlebek901 currently in love with the game!!
@@thechlebek901 And for good reason too
@@thechlebek901it really doesn't matter you can't talk about tanks going from British mark1 to M4 there's a thing called FT17 that changed everything
@@leprianto4930 The pershing was shown, Type 10 and ZTZ 99 are pointless to show
I do feel like it'd have been interesting to mention the French FT-17, given it was the first produced "normal" turreted design. Nonetheless an interesting video : D
I absolutely love the models and animation in this, being both an animator and taking a huge interest in the history of both world wars!
Man Leopard 2 did aged well now considering how they perform.
it was just overated they also performed bad in lybria or syria forgot which country
@@jacob-lf4id thats the thing media has been hyping about it, but no tank is invisible. All you need is air power. Ukraine need more air defences more than overrated tanks
They're one of the most modern tanks and they're reported to perform as excepted, good. People who judge military vehicles because they've seen videos of them being destroyed deserve prison. You don't know what the tank in question achieved before being destroyed. The same thing applies to Russian tanks.
@@MrAdamOOR lots of kids hyping up their countries mbt. but yea i agree with u totally im a diehard challenger 2 tank and i know it has never been destroyed by enemy fire before but one aps shell to its lower plate or side and its dead
@@ancalagon1144 with open terrain, artillery and most importantly the long range anti missile Ka-52 that makes it look bad. Leopard 2 variation is a good tank but the doctrines they are applying without proper air cover is suicidal. I guess small drones really can decide the tides for now.
Almost half of the abrams, 5 sent over have been been comfirmed "kills". As of making this comment. In only 2 months
Out of the 31 abramses in ukraine, 3 have been confirmed lost and 1 was damaged. Even if you couldnt damaged as a casulty, thats one eight, not half
@Brother_Rony sorry late at night when writing and for sole strange number I assumed their were only 12 abrams. My bad that's due to their only being 12 challengers their (what considering their smooth bore gun is probably a good thing, plus it's not like we could send any more with the size of the uk tank fleet😢). Either way ukriane has confirmed that they have temporarily taken the abrams off the frontlines. Tho the Leopards are still their and certainly won't ever be taken off simply due to how much ukriane has been given
@@baileygregory9192 coping wont make the tousands of russian wrecks any less shameful, but keep trying....
@@ythandle825 >send leopards
>leopards blown up
>send abrams
>abrams blown up
muh russian tanks are shit (ours dying at the same rate or faster doesnt mean theyre shit!!!)
@@whoami30204to be honest there is really no problem with russian tanks/their design. Its more the corruption, lack of proper maintainance due to corruption and the "questionable" way that they are sometimes used.