Evolution of the Tanks - Mitsi Studio

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 дек 2024

Комментарии •

  • @mitsistudio
    @mitsistudio  Год назад +563

    Join our RUclips or Patreon Membership for early access videos:
    ruclips.net/channel/UCuXCgyOCMXic7j0_wghXnRAjoin
    www.patreon.com/user?u=35130109&fan_landing=true&view_as=public

    • @aklapotherpotherpothikrebh603
      @aklapotherpotherpothikrebh603 Год назад +10

      Can you make a video about
      Evolution of helicopter?

    • @CFox.7
      @CFox.7 Год назад +2

      The crass language...really ? You think you're cool or trying to appeal to a 10 year old demographic ?

    • @valyshknee4203
      @valyshknee4203 Год назад +2

      wowww the pro-ukrainian stuff at the end really set me off, you clearly know nothing about the conflict, and you seem to not know or care that atleast quarter of your subs do not share your opinion, most of the world does not support Ukraine you know? most of the world's population support Russia, majority Africa, central asia, middle east, parts of south america, parts of the carribean, most of Asia and of course Russia itself, you are really shooting yourself in the foot with this even though Ukraine is losing the war.

    • @unsuisseegare1291
      @unsuisseegare1291 Год назад

      @@valyshknee4203 www.economist.com/media-assets/image/20220409_WOT949.png just look at the map...

    • @VEAFY
      @VEAFY Год назад +1

      T-34 Ukrainian tank or Soviet but not russian.

  • @riane3100
    @riane3100 Год назад +6680

    You guys can't just show up every couple of months and drop an absolute masterpiece each time.

  • @ementos5358
    @ementos5358 Год назад +7953

    Im surprised how they can make something so terrifying used in quite a lot of wars look so cartoonish.

    • @TheGreenB1rd
      @TheGreenB1rd Год назад +143

      Yea, that Mark I tank kinda cute tho😂

    • @adhiesive
      @adhiesive Год назад +87

      War is a game. Yet people still play it

    • @banielshow6424
      @banielshow6424 Год назад +20

      Viva lé France, Napoléon

    • @retrogamer545
      @retrogamer545 Год назад +21

      Tanks are not terrifying they are cool

    • @ch-53esuperstallion76
      @ch-53esuperstallion76 Год назад +49

      @@retrogamer545well the enemy will be terrified

  • @johanoskarsson8209
    @johanoskarsson8209 Год назад +1780

    A shame that the FT-17 wasn't mentioned considering how it was the first tank that looked like what we think of as a tank. All the same though, this is really awesome, and I hope to see more of this in the future.

    • @andyboi8399
      @andyboi8399 Год назад +161

      Yep, I agree, FT-17 set the benchmark for all modern tanks to come, and it was a superb light tank of the period too. Plus it's soo damn Cute! I just want to hug it and pet it on the turret, such a good boy.

    • @mrman5666
      @mrman5666 Год назад +22

      it was the first mass produst turret tank but lil willy did have a turret.but yay why no ft17.

    • @viski2528
      @viski2528 Год назад +42

      It is a very, very watered down history of the tank.

    • @nitsu2947
      @nitsu2947 Год назад +15

      I mean the FT-17 was the first to have been set up like the modern tanks we know. Surely didn't look like it, however the driver front, combat center and engine back was pioneered by the FT-17

    • @andrefasching1332
      @andrefasching1332 Год назад +11

      they also forgot about the austrian "Burstyn Motorgeschütz" from 1911/12
      It was even designed for crossing trenches and had a rotatable turret. In my eyes the only true first tank

  • @Bluestripedpillow
    @Bluestripedpillow Год назад +187

    I love how he is so educational yet still say stuff like "They can copy and paste tank name strait from ww2 like it a fucking call of duty game" GOD I love them. keep up the good work.

  • @ImpendingJoker
    @ImpendingJoker Год назад +2379

    You guys need to publish an RTS game using these models as assets. I would play the hell out of this.

    • @sharroYT
      @sharroYT Год назад +87

      Same, I love rts game especially modern military ones

    • @nozzatron01gaming11
      @nozzatron01gaming11 Год назад +79

      or make model kits of them, that would be amazing

    • @optimised120
      @optimised120 Год назад +39

      @@nozzatron01gaming11oooooh 3d printer time lol 😂

    • @somegdplayer4039
      @somegdplayer4039 Год назад +26

      I think in their patreon have models of things used to people who want to print them, not sure

    • @ranggars_
      @ranggars_ Год назад +3

      nice idea

  • @napoleonibonaparte7198
    @napoleonibonaparte7198 Год назад +884

    They can make a game with this style, and I'd buy it.

  • @braderickson9996
    @braderickson9996 Год назад +2441

    Thanks!
    Once again, a great piece.
    Bravo, Mitsi !!!

    • @mitsistudio
      @mitsistudio  Год назад +186

      Awesome!!!

    • @darkleaf5167
      @darkleaf5167 Год назад +36

      u wrong Italian tanks are the best
      Edit: I love it when I make stupid nonsense statements, people dumber than my comment come along to attack something so obvious. Xdddd

    • @ApacheBruv
      @ApacheBruv Год назад +42

      ​@@darkleaf5167The only thing better about Italian tanks is that the reverse is faster than forward.

    • @Accountlyut
      @Accountlyut Год назад +10

      @@ApacheBruvAnd smoll look cute

    • @asaifaji
      @asaifaji Год назад +2

      ​@@mitsistudiocan you do magic? I kinda want sword and magic

  • @TheBoringEdward
    @TheBoringEdward Год назад +87

    8:16 I mean, we still call our air force "Luftwaffe".

    • @HoneyBatxher
      @HoneyBatxher 6 месяцев назад

      Naja es ist was es ist. Luftwaffen. halt außerdem wurde im Video der KF51 gezeigt und nicht ein "Panther" was das nazi Deutschland namen kopieren jetzt auch nicht sinnvoll macht

    • @Basementguy1
      @Basementguy1 5 месяцев назад +8

      It's just air force in German 😂

    • @TheBoringEdward
      @TheBoringEdward 5 месяцев назад +1

      "Luftstreitkräfte" wohl eher

    • @Basementguy1
      @Basementguy1 5 месяцев назад

      die der Luftwaffe

  • @gn01816984
    @gn01816984 Год назад +2552

    Great video. But kinda sad that the Renault FT-17 wasn't mentioned here. It's the first tank to have a rotating turret. Can't imagine how modern tanks would look like without it.

    • @Canofasahi
      @Canofasahi Год назад +193

      And not only that, it was also the most produced tank from the Great War, 3700 of them, that's more than the Germans and Brits combined.
      Another thing they missed, Czechoslovakia had a decent tank production just before the war, the Germans used quite a lot of Panzer 35(t)'s and 38(t)'s well into 1941 until their own tank production finally caught up!

    • @_MaitreuPanda___
      @_MaitreuPanda___ Год назад +88

      It's the father of modern tanks, as you said it had a rotating turret but it also had a compartment specially for the engine.

    • @Canofasahi
      @Canofasahi Год назад +32

      @@_MaitreuPanda___ carbon monoxide poisoning was a serious issue in the early tanks.

    • @Yahtzee1
      @Yahtzee1 Год назад +31

      Couldn't agree more. It set the standard for most tanks put into service: A fully rotating turret; driver in the front, fighting compartment in the middle and engine compartment in the rear. Absolute unit of a little tank.

    • @captainobvious8530
      @captainobvious8530 Год назад +96

      Not surprising, this channel is anti-french for some reason

  • @Kingfisher_2376
    @Kingfisher_2376 Год назад +1123

    Actually, the replaceability of the M4 was quite comforting to Allied tank crews as it was the American Sherman that was over engineered, particularly in service to maximizing crew survivability. Anecdotally, there was one particular crew that ended up losing 3 tanks to enemy action, only to return to base to pick up a new tank each time.

    • @duitk
      @duitk Год назад +200

      Only 2500 Sherman crew died in WW2. It has the best crew survival rates. The T34 was unreliable and killed it's crew. Probably the second most overrated tank ever after the Tiger. At the end of the day trained tankers are the most precious resource in armored warfare, the tank that protects that best is the best tank.

    • @LyonPercival
      @LyonPercival Год назад +71

      Especially since T-34s usually don't have spall liners the whole WW2, a non-penetrating shot for a Sherman is a very deadly metal shatter to T-34 crews. Soviet crews were relatively expendable since they are easily replaced anyway.

    • @juryfilatov4520
      @juryfilatov4520 Год назад

      Just compare the numbers
      The Eastern Front had 6 million Germans and 9 million Soviet soldiers over the course of 4 years
      The United States had and the Allies landed 300 thousand soldiers in Normandy. At the same time, the operation was clearly planned by a member of the Kuklusklan movement

    • @massimookissed1023
      @massimookissed1023 Год назад +26

      I've heard one British tank vet say that he was in his 5th tank when WW2 ended.
      He also said the British didn't get a decent tank until *_after_* the war.

    • @eugeneoliveros5814
      @eugeneoliveros5814 Год назад +15

      @@duitkreminder that the Soviets put the fuel tanks in the fighting compartment to either side of the driver, which is less then ideal when you get hit

  • @Nietabs
    @Nietabs Год назад +986

    I was hoping for the french tanks to be mentioned like the Renault FT that was a game changer to ww1 that after the war, many nations learned from the Renault's design as it serves the basics of tank designs

    • @aurelienthietard7636
      @aurelienthietard7636 Год назад +124

      Don t expect to much of a channel that potrayed us as coward in a different video
      French bashing is still a thing twenty years after iraq

    • @cottonbear2777
      @cottonbear2777 Год назад +6

      @@aurelienthietard7636 hahaha

    • @l.a.wright6912
      @l.a.wright6912 Год назад +35

      With just how much it gets wrong I'm not suprised. Like how it never touches on the long barrel revolution and it mentions the importance whilst degrading the very tanks which inspired it. Or how it quite litterally makes it look like the maus was anything more than 2 prototypes and actually saw service (neither of which is true and if we compare it to other german prototype programs it's obvious how little attention it was given). Or how it perpetuates myths about german manufacturing (which is sad because the importance of allied bombings and the supply situation almost never gets stated)
      Honestly I might have to do a full writeup.

    • @emilianoiphone
      @emilianoiphone Год назад +6

      The 2c bis and charmond too

    • @louisdedieu4662
      @louisdedieu4662 Год назад +22

      It's crazy, he completely swept the French subject...

  • @ПалецВверх-у6м
    @ПалецВверх-у6м 9 месяцев назад +224

    Как же иронично весь этот нахрюк на бэбрамсы выглядит в свете недавних событий

    • @МаркМаркович-н3и
      @МаркМаркович-н3и 9 месяцев назад +1

      без нахрюка никуда, всё таки хорошо что у них есть только мультики

    • @lambogikka7039
      @lambogikka7039 9 месяцев назад +37

      Читаешь мысли) Ток хотел про этот анимационный высер написать...

    • @montecarlo2684
      @montecarlo2684 9 месяцев назад +16

      Не, ну про отлетающие башни, превратившиеся в доп. артиллерию реально смешно.

    • @lambogikka7039
      @lambogikka7039 9 месяцев назад

      @@montecarlo2684 Смешно будет нам, когда ты гавно будешь 5ый угол искать после захода Русских в Авдеевку.

    • @ВинниПух-у5п
      @ВинниПух-у5п 9 месяцев назад +30

      Ну, вот такая у них пропаганда...

  • @TheSYLOH
    @TheSYLOH Год назад +972

    The Sherman was one of the easiest tanks to escape from uninjured if it was destroyed, so that was of great comfort to the crews.

    • @cardiv5zuikaku944
      @cardiv5zuikaku944 Год назад +89

      Adding the fact that is bassicaly like a limousine for the crew considering the standard of the time

    • @brennanleadbetter9708
      @brennanleadbetter9708 Год назад +76

      That’s one of the reasons why Soviet tankers who had Shermans preferred it over the T-34.

    • @gaetantreib4163
      @gaetantreib4163 Год назад +20

      Yep, but it use very inflamable fuel and the shell compartment where not very well protected. Not for nothing that one of the sherman nickname was bronson. Shermans was just super easy to blew up.

    • @Gran-knight9815
      @Gran-knight9815 Год назад +21

      ​@gaetantreib4163 early shermans were prone to becoming bonfires however 1943 onward they were just as likely to set alight as another tank.

    • @cardiv5zuikaku944
      @cardiv5zuikaku944 Год назад +33

      @@gaetantreib4163 isnt its called "Ronson" not "Bronson" also that is only used post war.
      Also sherman is not that easy to blew up, study says they have similar explosion rate to other tanks of similar class or size at the time (Except the one british used as they have the brightest idea to overload the tank with ammo and still wonder why their tanks explosing everywhere) even an account from Russian that have Hero of the Soviet honor that use Sherman says he was pinned down while using his Sherman once from german attacks but his Sherman survives despite receiving multiple hits.

  • @9999AWC
    @9999AWC Год назад +952

    Wish you guys had mentioned the Centurion being the first MBT, and the FT-17 for basically defining what the modern tank should look like and function.

    • @alexeievgenievich5556
      @alexeievgenievich5556 Год назад +25

      Согласен, странно что ещё Леклерк не упомянули. Самый технологичный танк запада того времени.

    • @petrf-rw4pw
      @petrf-rw4pw Год назад +8

      Первый ОБТ - советский Т-64

    • @Vanadium
      @Vanadium Год назад

      @@alexeievgenievich5556 Первым основным боевым танком мог стать "Центурион" или "Пантера".

    • @Xyleena_Akira
      @Xyleena_Akira Год назад +36

      ​@@petrf-rw4pwcenturion was made 1946

    • @neoknight9180
      @neoknight9180 Год назад +27

      @@petrf-rw4pwthat’s not even the first soviet MBT bro

  • @Mr_Metro
    @Mr_Metro Год назад +289

    I’m sad you guys didn’t mention one of the best tanks from WW1 (and my personal favorite) the French FT-17 Rennault, it was one of the first tanks that looked like a modern tank (outward treads, single barrel on a turret that was either a 8mm machine gun or a 37mm cannon), and one of the first mass produced tanks, but nevertheless great video!

    • @manofironthathasntturnedcr9817
      @manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 Год назад +6

      I think you made a mistake. The Renault was armed with either a single barrel cannon or a machine gun. We hadn’t really figured out how to put those two together at the time, and it’s not like there was enough space in the turret anyway.

    • @Mr_Metro
      @Mr_Metro Год назад +14

      @@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 Thank you for pointing that out, I had meant to say that but I forgot to fix that line of text when I rewrote this like 5 times, I’ll fix it now

    • @CascouPrime
      @CascouPrime Год назад +20

      afterwards, I think Mitsi doesn't like French, given the treatment they had in previous videos

    • @adddaddda7748
      @adddaddda7748 Год назад +4

      @@CascouPrime In which video ? It's a real shame, if for such a reason, they didn't mention France at all in this video. I mean that country is kinda a pioneer in tank developpement.

    • @forters7613
      @forters7613 Год назад +4

      @@adddaddda7748 in the video where they prtray how different countries fight, France shows up and instead of... idk Napoleon's grand armee, or ww1 french soldiers, or hell even the french resistance in 1940, they just showed a stereotypical french dude waving a white flag at the first sign of trouble. I wasn't surprised afterwards that the FT wasn't even mentionned in this video considering the previous french bashing...

  • @Olvidemos_eso
    @Olvidemos_eso 10 месяцев назад +16

    Cuanto sesgo político quieres en tu video?
    Mitsi Studio: si

    • @yasermotaky7410
      @yasermotaky7410 Месяц назад +1

      No menciona ni siquiera un TIGER 2...

    • @wladehot2586
      @wladehot2586 11 часов назад

      ​@@yasermotaky7410 What about Tiger 2? The Tiger 2, like the first tiger, is a mobile armored tank destroyer designed to cover the fronts, of course, it looks impressive, but in fact it is not a tank in the standard sense, and it would be more useful from Japanese medium tanks of the latest modifications, and, by the way, if I agree with the author of the video about Italian tanks. But the Japanese tanks were not so bad, which cannot be said about the British, who were technologically lagging behind until the end of the war, and if their first tank was good, then if you follow their history of tank building, they are still not very successful, which is very paradoxical for us.
      а что тигр 2 ? тигр 2 это как и первый тигр ,мобильная бронированная ПТСАУ ,разработанная для затыкания фронтов ,выглядит конечно внушительно ,но по сути затычка ,коя и танком в стандартном понимании не является ,от японских средних танков последних модификаций и то толку было бы больше и кстати ,если на счёт итальянских танков я с автором видео согласен ,то вот японские танки были не так уж и плохи ,чего не скажешь о британских ,кои до конца войны так и отставали технологически и если их первый танк был хорош ,то в дальнейшем если проследить их историю танкостроения ,у них до сих пор всё не очень хорошо ,что как по мне весьма иронично.

  • @squareguy5353
    @squareguy5353 Год назад +294

    Its honestly amazing how much effort we put into destroying eachother.

    • @SSgtJ0hns0n
      @SSgtJ0hns0n Год назад +19

      You can bet when someone invents something new, some prick will pop up next to them asking two questions;
      1. How can we kill people with this?
      2. How can this help to make things more comfortable for the lives of MY people who are going out to kill OTHER people?

    • @colelinse6196
      @colelinse6196 Год назад +9

      Its a bit more natural than you think

    • @WG55
      @WG55 Год назад +13

      The key is to put more effort into killing your enemy than your enemy is putting into killing you.

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 Год назад

      Well, simply put, if the other guy has a sharp stick, then you need a sharp rock on a stick, because otherwise he can come over and steal your stuff.
      Humans can operate well in groups, but groups rarely work together if it's not against something else.

    • @sturmgeschutze3070
      @sturmgeschutze3070 Год назад

      @@WG55I’d argue the key is to put in more effort in the factory so the guys in the field put in none.

  • @federovsquared5646
    @federovsquared5646 Год назад +281

    I really like the styling of these videos! After watching, I think some other tanks should have been mentioned such as:
    - Vezdekhod (First motorised armoured tank prototype)
    - Renault FT tank (First tank to have a fully rotating turret)
    - Char 2C (Largest operational tank)

    • @Herr_Jäger
      @Herr_Jäger 10 месяцев назад +2

      Isnt the tsar tank the biggest operational tank?

    • @federovsquared5646
      @federovsquared5646 9 месяцев назад +2

      @@Herr_Jäger I don't even know if that even classifies as a tank 🤣

    • @Herr_Jäger
      @Herr_Jäger 9 месяцев назад

      @@federovsquared5646 Everyone else calls it a tank 🤷‍♂️

    • @federovsquared5646
      @federovsquared5646 9 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@Herr_Jäger Probably because calling it an armoured fighting vehicle is too long of a name.

    • @johnsonknight1120
      @johnsonknight1120 9 месяцев назад

      The Renault FT-17 is mentioned in the World War I video.

  • @sukoiberkut75
    @sukoiberkut75 Год назад +143

    ¡Gracias!

    • @mitsistudio
      @mitsistudio  Год назад +21

      Awesome!!!

    • @the_ewil
      @the_ewil 9 месяцев назад +3

      Khohol?

    • @DakXlite
      @DakXlite 7 месяцев назад +2

      20 mexican dollars

    • @fonfon3965
      @fonfon3965 4 месяца назад

      @@mitsistudio do m4a3e2 sherman and kv-2

  • @North8008
    @North8008 Месяц назад +6

    0:58 horses actually can have up to 16 horse power

  • @hfd_blackrose.of.darwin
    @hfd_blackrose.of.darwin Год назад +664

    Im quite disappointed that they failed to mention the Rennault tank the French were fielding during WW1. Their design basically inspired future tank designs in the following years of history.
    Edit: Eyyy why people fighting in my comments?

    • @F.O.U.N.D.E.R
      @F.O.U.N.D.E.R Год назад +1

      The author hates French and russians

    • @TamanskayaDivision
      @TamanskayaDivision Год назад +144

      The animation is gold, however the writting is really, really bad. It feels like they copy & pasted some biased british/american article, inserted some old myths and as you said above, completely forgot about the really important designs like the FT-17, T-55 and the introduction of ERAs.

    • @TrafficTheCone
      @TrafficTheCone Год назад +6

      they post like every month, if you aren't satisfied with it why are you watching em? if you want those many tanks watch a full tank documentary telling all the tanks in history, they aren't national geographic.

    • @curtis1552
      @curtis1552 Год назад +51

      Yep, they even forgot to mention that the French had superior tanks during the start of WW2 but didn't know how to incorporate them in their armed forces.

    • @Oogadyman
      @Oogadyman Год назад +19

      @@TrafficTheConeyou not aloud to have a opinion ? He was not criticizing it he was just saying his opinion

  • @mr.tmcmeister4131
    @mr.tmcmeister4131 Год назад +65

    5:44 is my favorite part. That fading of the foreground to highlight the flying tank killed me

    • @Senior--Pomidor
      @Senior--Pomidor Год назад

      По задумке, эти танки должны были доставляться на транспортных самолётах в тыл немецких войск и объеденившись с силами ополчения СССР - "партизанами" наносить удары по немецким линиям снабжения, держу вкурсе

  • @hanzkommandant
    @hanzkommandant Год назад +144

    Tanks won't be obsolete, it'll adapt and improve over the years just like infantry and perhaps aircraft. People have said that since World War 1 yet main battle tanks are still relevant in the modern battlefield, albeit with improvements and newer technology.

    • @WolfeSaber
      @WolfeSaber Год назад +2

      It's just that Russia doesn't know how to use Soviet tanks. The KF-51 tank can smoke both tank and drone on the bbq.

    • @hanzkommandant
      @hanzkommandant Год назад +4

      @@WolfeSaber Training is also key. Yes, your statement is somewhat correct.

    • @whispofwords2590
      @whispofwords2590 Год назад +17

      ​@@WolfeSaberIts not only that, but people seem to think that just because tanks are being destroyed that makes them obsolete. Engines of war will be destroyed in the course of their use just by being Engines of war. Doesnt matter what it is.

    • @warthoggoulags1679
      @warthoggoulags1679 Год назад +1

      @@WolfeSaber now they do, they didn't in the begining of the war

    • @theroundtable6371
      @theroundtable6371 Год назад +4

      @@whispofwords2590 B-b-but MY countries MBT that isn't in Ukraine and has never saw combat against a conventional army would do SO much better guys, it has all these better traits, trust me!

  • @CliffCardi
    @CliffCardi Год назад +6

    4:00 not knowing about the New Zealand Bob Semple tank, which was basically an armored tractor.

  • @outsider9599
    @outsider9599 Год назад +680

    Good video but it's sad that France isn't mentioned when it was the first country to develop a "modern tank" with 360° turret and tracks, the succesful Renault FT-17. We had pretty nice design during the WWII and the Cold War too (B1 bis, AMX 13,...)

    • @latch9781
      @latch9781 Год назад +22

      FT is a critical development. Oscilating turrets can go straight to hell though

    • @b1bis204
      @b1bis204 Год назад

      it's not a bad turret configuration
      the question is Why did we built Oscilation turrets?
      Oscilating turrets have his advantages like placement saver, smaller size and could on certain tanks equipped with autoloader so on lighter tanks ist an absolute monster killer (see the ebr in WT annoying)
      but on heavy tanks in another hand is pointless, poor elevation degrees
      @@latch9781

    • @calhounli9656
      @calhounli9656 Год назад +11

      ​@@latch9781Oscillating turrets were the best design at that time, plus the French did come up with other amazing things during that time. In my opinion Amx 30 is also a superior counterpart than the German leopard 1.

    • @weaselwolf8425
      @weaselwolf8425 Год назад +1

      ​@@latch9781Oscillating turrets wonky asf

    • @xXCharli03Xx
      @xXCharli03Xx Год назад +1

      ​@@latch9781 Oscilating turrets were amazing, not by the design neither armor protection (which was not really good), but because they were the consequences of a really fast automatic reloading system.

  • @Stealth86651
    @Stealth86651 Год назад +359

    How long have you guys been in the animation industry? This just feels extremely professional and well done. The details, everything having personality, effort spent everywhere not just on key stuff. It's really impressive, makes me think you guys will have a really good run over time.

    • @PopTap
      @PopTap Год назад +16

      Watch their introduction video about themselves

    • @AL-Shorts_YT
      @AL-Shorts_YT 11 месяцев назад +1

      3 years

  • @Pointclearius
    @Pointclearius Год назад +288

    I'm surprised the Centurion didn't get a mention, nor the Challenger 2.
    Good video, love the art style. Keep it up!

    • @mcstaal
      @mcstaal Год назад +26

      Or the Renault FT.

    • @arrowoneomega4649
      @arrowoneomega4649 Год назад +2

      morser karl or shwerer gustav

    • @andybelcher1767
      @andybelcher1767 Год назад +6

      Also, Little Willie never went to France and the A7V could fall over 🤣🤣🤣

    • @68poundercarronade
      @68poundercarronade Год назад +3

      ​@@arrowoneomega4649those aren't tanks, they're artillery

    • @samwatson2373
      @samwatson2373 Год назад

      I thought that as well, re Centurion and Challenger series

  • @IBXakunlama
    @IBXakunlama Год назад +13

    7:06 was the funniest scene😂

  • @Romatwoknfive
    @Romatwoknfive Год назад +161

    05:18 "you can barbaross all the way back to where you came from"💀💀💀

    • @D4v1dWasTaken
      @D4v1dWasTaken 6 месяцев назад +1

      What does Barbaross mean?

    • @redenzR
      @redenzR 6 месяцев назад +5

      @@D4v1dWasTaken It was Operation Barbarossa which the Germans had launched against the Soviet Union in WW2 ~1941

    • @Terapevt1k
      @Terapevt1k 6 месяцев назад +3

      ​@@D4v1dWasTaken The Barbarossa plan was the Germans' plan to capture the USSR in a few weeks, but the war dragged on

  • @btm9099
    @btm9099 Год назад +54

    3:59 damn they’re being perfectly honest about it

  • @guillermorobustelli2652
    @guillermorobustelli2652 Год назад +124

    You forgot to mention Jan Zizka, the Bohemian leader who was the first to successfully use war wagons as battle tanks to face the entire Holy Roman Empire armies without losing a single battle during the Hussite Wars.

    • @kazueballesteros3665
      @kazueballesteros3665 Год назад +2

      Bohemia would might not survive the russo ukrainian war
      If it still existed ofc or uh survive by improving their tanks and smart soldiers

    • @kristopherdecker6549
      @kristopherdecker6549 Год назад +1

      Or that dude with the elephants.

    • @kingcytoxien1775
      @kingcytoxien1775 Год назад

      he cant show every tank that was shown to humans, its not a documentary

  • @SnappBacc
    @SnappBacc 8 месяцев назад +1

    3:54 Japan: Type 3 chi-nu, Type 3 chi-ha,
    Italy: P26, M40, AB41 (not a tank but decent armoured car)

  • @FahrurRoziqin
    @FahrurRoziqin Год назад +57

    8:29 I agree and like how the way you tell that Ukraine were indeed just a giant testing ground

    • @fy_pool_day
      @fy_pool_day 7 месяцев назад +2

      He haven't said that. He says that countries are also using ruzzian invasion to test their weapons. Which is nothing new and has nothing to do with the reason the war started.

    • @aryansmily3205
      @aryansmily3205 5 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@fy_pool_day Ukrainian brainwashed kid don't cry because Russia is winning 🗿🍷

  • @jbeckley6849
    @jbeckley6849 Год назад +227

    With Mitsi, you are guaranteed to learn something new while cracking up laughing.

    • @Master10k2
      @Master10k2 Год назад +2

      3:54 ... Definitely. XD

    • @blazed9346
      @blazed9346 Год назад +5

      And enjoying US propaganda :D

  • @southendsunxdsep
    @southendsunxdsep Год назад +64

    Shame they didn't mention French tanks as the Renault FT changed the conception of tanks for the end of WW1 and WW2.
    For those wondering it had the 1st turret that could rotate and needed only 2 soldiers to operate. It is considered as the 1st "modern" tank
    Or the FCM 2C that needed 13 soldiers to operate but was a slow monster

    • @X13565
      @X13565 Год назад +8

      They didnt even mention the french as tank makers XD, so sad...

  • @Safe117
    @Safe117 8 месяцев назад +2

    i love this animation style so much, it takes a dark truth and turns it into something funny and sort of cute with the colors and little round soldiers lol

  • @catthatlooksatyoufunny7377
    @catthatlooksatyoufunny7377 Год назад +85

    I absolutely need a tank game with this kind of style, commentary and all
    Also im glad you pointed out the panther naming thing cuz i find it really weird, hopefully this version doesnt have any reliability issues lmao

    • @mr.flupsurf2860
      @mr.flupsurf2860 11 месяцев назад +6

      there was a game like this, but dont know the name anymore.

    • @Alphatrillon
      @Alphatrillon 9 месяцев назад

      ​@@mr.flupsurf2860shield wall

  • @coolsolder
    @coolsolder Год назад +32

    Didn't expect that splat at 2:27 . Brutal

  • @dylanbilson4271
    @dylanbilson4271 Год назад +118

    2:20
    Standing in a line of fire
    32 will lead the way
    Coming over the trench and wire
    Going through endless grey
    4:14
    We are the Panzer Elite
    Born to compete
    Never retreat
    5:00
    Into the Motherland the German Army marched
    Comrades stand side by side to stop the Nazi charge
    7:30
    Death in the shape of Panzer Battallion
    Insect of terror, don't run
    Face your fate like a man

  • @e66e55
    @e66e55 Месяц назад +3

    1:27 i know its hard to catch BUT THAT ONE WOOD THINGIE HAS THAT V8 ENGINE I SEE IT

  • @V-S7909
    @V-S7909 Год назад +164

    3:55
    The reason why Japan and Italy were not good at building tank was that they were facing different enemies. In the 1930s and before WW2, both Japan and Italy were against relatively weaker countries. In the 1930s, Japan was against Chinese who did not have enough explosives or tanks to destroy Japanese tanks. Italy was against Ethiopian who also did not have enough explosives or tanks to destroy Italian tanks. Because of these, both countries did not feel the necessity to build more durable and powerful tanks because their light tanks were enough to against pre-WW2 enemies. While, the UK, US, USSR, and Germany had to build more durable and powerful tanks to defeat powerful enemies who were euqal foe each other.
    Moreover, there were some limitations in production, and engineering. Major powerful countries of WW2 had enough production capacity and engineering. While, Japan were lack at production capacity and engineering, and Italy was lack at production capacity.

    • @ryanw531
      @ryanw531 Год назад +30

      To also follow up Italy was expecting combat in mountain terrain(but ended up in the desert) and the Japanese were fighting in island jungle thus lightweight/easy to maneuver tanks made more sense than heavy armored tanks, also the Japanese was aiming for a naval victory thus Battleships Aircraft Carriers and Torpedoes were prioritized over tanks.

    • @aidenm9510
      @aidenm9510 Год назад +16

      Plus the Japanese tanks usually were required to be able to perform amphibious landings or at least brought on shore by a smaller landing craft, which limited their weight and therefore armor and gun caliber

    • @patrickwoodruff8881
      @patrickwoodruff8881 Год назад +2

      japan just had bad tank designs lol

    • @LanderKoenig
      @LanderKoenig Год назад +1

      Makes sense, explains a lot

    • @DieNibelungenliad
      @DieNibelungenliad Год назад +8

      Japan was building ships so they couldnt build as much tanks

  • @KungFuWizardOfJesus
    @KungFuWizardOfJesus Год назад +48

    Best animation studio I have watched in a long while.

    • @KungFuWizardOfJesus
      @KungFuWizardOfJesus Год назад

      @@jzsbff4801 fully agree

    • @illegalisntlegal
      @illegalisntlegal Год назад

      ​@jzsbff4801 I love how they just slapped the swastika right in your face not giving any craps about demonitization

  • @M551_Sheridan
    @M551_Sheridan Год назад +100

    5:55 sure it can bitch slap mines, but it can also become a warcrime device when your out of ammo :)

    • @Whytfarehandlesathing
      @Whytfarehandlesathing 6 месяцев назад

      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      The bodies were mangled beyond recognition.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION.
      T H E B O D I E S W E R E M A N G L E D B E Y O N D R E C O G N I T I O N.

    • @Cetussoldier
      @Cetussoldier 5 месяцев назад +3

      OH NAH YOU WILD FOR THIS ONE

  • @betula2137
    @betula2137 11 месяцев назад +4

    01:36: it was actually an Australian who proposed the original tank, multiple times, the leadership were like 'nup' until they borrowed the concepts (which they to pay compensation for)

    • @TC1YT
      @TC1YT 10 месяцев назад

      U mean Austrian?

    • @betula2137
      @betula2137 10 месяцев назад

      @@TC1YT No I mean Australian. After all, we had plenty of inspiration with emus 'n all

  • @Geshiko-GuP
    @Geshiko-GuP Год назад +12

    "Wonder how the Leopards are doing"
    Let me give you a demonstration
    Landmine: Kaboom?
    Russians: Yes Rico, Kaboom

    • @averiWonBTW
      @averiWonBTW Год назад +2

      Not to mention that Ukraine also uses Russian tanks so it’s not the tank that is performing poorly…

  • @otterspocket97
    @otterspocket97 Год назад +78

    I absolutely adore the animation style and the writing for this. Streamlined and adult to keep my attention

  • @grayface19yearsago70
    @grayface19yearsago70 Год назад +40

    With the effort of animation and content put into every single video. This channel is so much way underrated and deserves so much more

  • @AIK-arT
    @AIK-arT 11 месяцев назад

    아 진짜 너무 재미있게 잘봤습니다😊
    역시 밀리터리의 꽃은 전차지요❤
    아기자기한게 너무 귀여운데 화력이 화끈하네요❤❤❤❤❤

  • @Lukusprime
    @Lukusprime Год назад +109

    First time viewer, long time tank fan; it’s honestly amazing how they’re able to get CG to look almost exactly like filmed claymation

  • @Chris-hz8ll
    @Chris-hz8ll Год назад +191

    Not every German tank was over-engineered and produced in small numbers. The StuGIII was the most produced German tank because it was very cheap and efficient. The reason why German tanks kept getting bigger was, that initially this strategy was very successful. The Tiger 1 was the first heavy tank and had no opponents. But at a certain point, size becomes a disadvantage. So this strategy didn't work anymore. If you compare numbers then you also have to consider the economic strength of the countries.

    • @Kingfisher_2376
      @Kingfisher_2376 Год назад +18

      Minor Correction: Heavy tanks like the Tiger never technically stopped working, so much as they became tactically redundant decades later. The US and USSR both adopted version of their own during the Cold War.
      Germany's issues during WW2 largely stem from its resource poverty. It never had the fuel reserves to function as a modern mechanized army in the way that the US, UK and USSR did.
      So, I guess they kinda did stop working, but in a more literal sense than you seem to imply.

    • @TheNapster153
      @TheNapster153 Год назад +1

      ​@@Kingfisher_2376The key to German heavy tanks was reliable logistics and maintenance. A dedicated tank regiment with excellent radio based coordination and proper support was expected to punch through the enemy lines and wreak havoc whilst mechanised and motorised troops followed up.
      This is a doctrine that is still used to this day, but what Germany suffered in WW2 was the horrible state of their logistics. Not only they had sabotaged production lines and faulty supply points, their comms were also tapped in late war meaning that any and all moves they made were known to their enemies.
      Also, the lost of air power was one of the biggest damnings to happen to them. With the threat of getting annihilated from above, german armour was unable to play any active roles during daytime and had to move under the cover of darkness.
      The last bit may also be where the term 'Army of the Night' became popularised from.

    • @generalhorse493
      @generalhorse493 Год назад +4

      The Tiger 1 was a good heavy tank but it was too heavy and over engineered compared the sherman or t34.
      Plus, as early as Kursk the Soviets had devised ways to kill or disable Tigers.
      Anti tank trenches, anti tank mines, new Ptab anti tank bomblets dropped by Il-2s, and positioning t34s, anti tank guns and spgs into positions where they could shoot Tigers in the much thinner side or rear armor.
      Also, don't forget that after Kursk things like the Sherman firefly, Sherman 76, M36 jackson, Su-85, Su-100, Isu-122 and Is-2s started rolling onto the battlefield.
      Also also, the germans forgot to provide enough recovery vehicles in the event a tiger was disabled or broke down.

    • @rgelioredeker3374
      @rgelioredeker3374 Год назад

      Bastante errónea tu información, es sabido que en EEUU y Europa están borrando la historia pero te aviso que el Tiger I no fue el primer tanque pesado, fuera de modelos prototipos, el primero en producirse en números decentes fueron los modelos KV rusos, los cuales para inicio de Barbarroja no tenían rival y solo un cañón antitanque de 88 o un bombardero eran capaces de neutralizarlos (La película estadounidense "Fury", esta basada en la historia real de como un solitario KV-1 fue capaz de frenar toda una división panzer por su cuenta y tras destruir todos los cañones de 88 que los alemanes poseían, fue destruido junto con su tripulación por unidades de granaderos) y el Tiger I fue la respuesta a los KV 1 y 2 soviéticos.

    • @taistelusammakko5088
      @taistelusammakko5088 Год назад +2

      ​@@generalhorse493the tiger wasnt t 34 or m4 sherman. It had a designated role as a breakthrough tank, such as no medium tank wouldnt be enough to replace it

  • @napoleonibonaparte7198
    @napoleonibonaparte7198 Год назад +132

    It's disgraceful they didn't mention the most powerful tank of WW2, the Bob Semple.

    • @liliankeong
      @liliankeong Год назад +3

      Viva le France

    • @dylanmoore3201
      @dylanmoore3201 Год назад +1

      Me attempting to find the funny

    • @humanperson9443
      @humanperson9443 Год назад

      Made of the strongest armor and weapons

    • @johngellare3507
      @johngellare3507 Год назад +1

      It's armor looked like simple corrugated iron, but was actually made of a secret material known as New-Zealandium!

    • @Akin_channel
      @Akin_channel Год назад

      The main gun could kill any human, and it was equipped with many of them. That's horrible😱

  • @williamritchie693
    @williamritchie693 10 месяцев назад +2

    Fun fact. The name tank was supposed to be only a cover for the first tanks. Many of the soldiers who saw them covered assumed they were water tanks and that’s what command stuck with.
    It could have been anything. Maybe it could have been called “big metal box with guns that may or may not break down or explode”.

  • @debilus7921
    @debilus7921 Год назад +41

    Now that we had tanks, maybe the evolution of battleships ? xD
    With like the ships of the line at the start, then the monitors, dreadnoughts etc... And finally to finish with the Iowa and Yamato :3
    It would be interesting I think ^^
    And great video of course, as always ^^

    • @amhuman5138
      @amhuman5138 Год назад

      Heck, it could even cover the Iowa's conversion, and potentially some of the future concepts of a 'battleship' (I.e a bigass ship containing hundreds of VLS launchers)

    • @debilus7921
      @debilus7921 Год назад

      @@amhuman5138 Ah yeah, didn't thought about the future of battleships (and why it has been raplaced by aircraft carrier too ^^')

    • @amhuman5138
      @amhuman5138 Год назад

      @@debilus7921Yeah, that's a good one too.

    • @mrpoyo7968
      @mrpoyo7968 Год назад

      ​@@amhuman5138either that or they gonna use railguns when they become available

  • @spirit_miku
    @spirit_miku Год назад +26

    i love these animations there so well put together i remember when How Countries Fight Their Wars popped up in my recommended 3 years ago I'm happy to see more animations being uploaded again there pure gold and the commentary tops it off

  • @lazy_bag_bones-hs3fb
    @lazy_bag_bones-hs3fb Год назад +25

    It's a shame that not a single French tank has been mentioned, not even the FT 17 which is the father of French tanks

    • @leprianto4930
      @leprianto4930 Год назад +4

      It's not the father of French tanks in fact there was other before it but it is the father of modern tanks with a 360° turret and an engine in the back but you are right tho there should have been at least one French tanks since they were some of the biggest designer of those

    • @jacksheldon8566
      @jacksheldon8566 19 дней назад

      The somua was also the main design that influenced the Sherman.

  • @coling3957
    @coling3957 Год назад +3

    Little Willy was a development vehicle to demonstrate the concept. It was never intended for service, simply to display the characteristics to be incorporated in future fighting vehicles...

  • @jaxon3999
    @jaxon3999 Год назад +45

    5:05 T-34 really just said "siuuu" 💀💀💀

    • @NascarF1_driver
      @NascarF1_driver 10 месяцев назад +3

      Now I can’t unhear it💀💀💀💀

    • @get2da_chappa
      @get2da_chappa 10 месяцев назад +2

      i hear the loud moaning meme 😭

  • @rigmo2224
    @rigmo2224 Год назад +38

    I love this Studio so much because of how quick it pumps out new content we get to love and enjoy 🙏🙏🙏

    • @itsamefroggie
      @itsamefroggie Год назад +2

      "quick" lol (not that I have a problem with a video a month)

    • @magical_dioxide7948
      @magical_dioxide7948 Год назад +1

      @@itsamefroggie yeah its not quick at all but the animation and research done for the videos aswell as how long they are is well worth the wait👍

  • @Waaott
    @Waaott Год назад +33

    The Bob Semple Tank would be a interesting variant too. Great video!

  • @AnastasiyaPonagorov-mh5sn
    @AnastasiyaPonagorov-mh5sn 2 месяца назад

    Im pretty surprised Mitsi studio is so good i really like it thank you Mitsi studio for making such
    good video's!

  • @josephpoirot5029
    @josephpoirot5029 Год назад +51

    You forgot to tell about french tanks who introduced a lot of new technologie before the WWII, like during the great war with the renault ft 17, it was far more eficient than other tanks, to big and slow, and the b1 bis who were facing easely german tanks at the begining of WWII, the only problem were the use of and the sabotage in production.

    • @haydentenno6773
      @haydentenno6773 Год назад

      they will never do that XD this channel is part of the stupid french-bashing clan ... they just act like they're an history channel lol

    • @vilks887
      @vilks887 Год назад +1

      Indeed

  • @xaythearsonist2003
    @xaythearsonist2003 Год назад +22

    4:46 my guy was poppin' wheelies while in tank while dunkin' on Germans 😂😂😂😂

  • @RemyistStudio
    @RemyistStudio Год назад +18

    Forgot to mention the FT-17, the first tank with a rotating turret

  • @hiraeth0811
    @hiraeth0811 8 месяцев назад +30

    война на Украине показала что леопард не может воевать довольно долго на поле боя, так же как и абрамс, которого с первого выстрела уничтожил т-72б3

    • @SFM_MEDIC228
      @SFM_MEDIC228 8 месяцев назад +8

      Абрамс: 😭😡
      Т-72б3: 🗿🤫

    • @DmitriyOrlovW
      @DmitriyOrlovW 4 месяца назад +4

      Абрамс и Леопард не предназначены для этого поля боя - они предназначены для твердой поверхности и открытой местности, где они могут использовать высокую скорость, хорошие приборы обзора и прицеливания, и самое главное - поддержку авиацией и артиллерией, и всем возможным. А на Украине - зыбкая почва и деревья - они проваливаются и не могут использовать свою оптику максимально эффективно, а поддержки у них вообще никакой нет. И экипажи на них не обучены - управлять танком можно научиться очень быстро, но вот вести бой - это нужны годы обучения.

    • @СтепанКозырев-м1ы
      @СтепанКозырев-м1ы 4 месяца назад +2

      Абрамс и леопард когда в них попал снаряд т 90 😢😢😢😔😡🤬😖🤕🤕♨️🎆🎇

    • @Kurze_fan
      @Kurze_fan 13 дней назад

      ​@@DmitriyOrlovW Получается идеальной территорией для Абрамов и Леопардов является немецкие автобаны ?

    • @DmitriyOrlovW
      @DmitriyOrlovW 13 дней назад

      @@Kurze_fan Они были созданы для территорий и стран типа Ирана, Ирака, Сирии, где много открытого места с твердой поверхностью и практически нет ПВО, мешающего поддержке авиацией. Ну и для продажи союзникам - там важнее подставка под бутылку с "Колой" и кондиционер, чем надежный двигатель и ходовая.

  • @adamcheklat7387
    @adamcheklat7387 Год назад +32

    6:57: That thing looks like it can wreck a giant.

  • @m.a.118
    @m.a.118 Год назад +23

    7:45 - *listens carefully* Wait is that... Red Al- No.... Yes. Yes it is. Don't know how you got around the copyright, but hey good call.

  • @newcourier7446
    @newcourier7446 Год назад +10

    The Soviet March at the end of the video was absolute perfection

    • @juehju
      @juehju Год назад +2

      i noticed it instantly because i listen to it on repeat 😭

    • @IrwanMilano
      @IrwanMilano Год назад

      8:28

  • @-Griffin-
    @-Griffin- 7 месяцев назад

    Talking about the history of tanks without mentioning the Renault FT is incredible.....truly incredible

  • @hahadesu6355
    @hahadesu6355 Год назад +20

    You can probably Barbarossa your way out of there 5:16
    BEST LINE XD

  • @javierstewbean7503
    @javierstewbean7503 Год назад +30

    5:56 “you had a crab Sherman used to bitch slap mines into the air” 😂😂😂😂

  • @Ashishsharma-fw8nu
    @Ashishsharma-fw8nu Год назад +22

    All i want in life is to be as happy as the cowboy at 7:19

  • @felixthecat3n2
    @felixthecat3n2 29 дней назад

    These videos are absolutely brilliant.. I'm sure it takes 100s of hours to produce just a minute or two of film.. Keep up the good work!

  • @raphael-1531
    @raphael-1531 Год назад +34

    I’m disappointed the French tanks aren’t portrayed when they was innovative and effectives the FT17 literally created the true design of tanks and ww2 French tanks where also the best of their time ( but they had problems of doctrines and high commands )

    • @stephen4121
      @stephen4121 Год назад +12

      Yup not sure how France wasn't one of the main tank producing nations. They certainly produced more and more capable tanks than the Japanese or Italians that's for certain. The Chars were impressive tanks, just sadly the French army was stuck in WW1 mode.

    • @manofironthathasntturnedcr9817
      @manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 Год назад +3

      @@stephen4121 France had a pretty big anti war sentiment during the interwar. So why would we have produced massive quantitities of tank that we wouldn’t have needed in an ideal world ? And by the time we realised we needed more tanks, it was too late anyway.
      One of said chars, the B1-bis had been in development since 1920. Very much stuck as a WW1 type of design. And intended to be used in a trench war scenario. It was still a nightmare for every german unlucky enough to encounter one during the short lived conflict.
      The only counter for the B1-bis the german had at the during the rather short war against my country was the 88mm anti air gun, whose effectiveness as an anti tank weapon was only discovered by pure accident. Probably a gun crew saw a B1 approaching, panicked, pointed the gun at the tank in desperation and fired.
      In terms of effectiveness, think about this: At one point, a single B1 tore apart a small german armored column. 13 tanks destroyed in a single engagement. And not a single penetrating german shot out of the dozens that hit the aforementioned B1.
      They were so good the germans salvaged the ones they could, and stuck a flamethrower where the 75mm was. You know, for extra nastiness. And then threw those at the soviets.
      To quote a comic about it, it was a « slug with enough armour to pass as a swiss safe, and with sharp teeth ». Comic is named « The butcher of Stonne », if you are interested.

    • @VegasFan3000
      @VegasFan3000 Год назад

      @@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 B1 Bis wasn't developped in 1920'. The "Char de Bataille" trials was in 1924, and the B1 was develloped from its contestants in the beginning of the 30', it wasn't made to reach trenches, but instead to assault fortifications like the Siegfried line and to be used as support for the Maginot Line guns.

    • @VegasFan3000
      @VegasFan3000 Год назад

      France also producted more than 1000 infantry tank in 1940 and 500 cavalry tanks, along side many armored cars

  • @GuardbrosFieldRadio
    @GuardbrosFieldRadio Год назад +74

    I actually quite like the fact that they brought back the Panther name for one of their tanks; Germany's naming schedule makes it immediately known whos tank it is, and they have always used predatory feline animals for their tank names. To bring back the Panther is an honor to the tank that came before it and the crews that manned it, regardless of what government used it.

    • @EllroyMcBong
      @EllroyMcBong Год назад +11

      It's nevertheless unfortunate that they chose the name of a tank that was activly used by the Nazis during WW2, especially if you consider that there are other "predatory feline animals" whose names could have been used. Löwe (Lion) was the name of an experiemental design during WW2, while Jaguar (both the same in English and German, so a huge plus) wasn't used as a name for a tank during WW2 at all. Looking at all these facts, the decision to reuse the name "Panther" looks odd at best. Considering that Germany is currently again frowned upon for taking a leading role in Europe, it's downright distasteful - and I say that as a German.

    • @GuardbrosFieldRadio
      @GuardbrosFieldRadio Год назад

      @@EllroyMcBong Ah yes, the brainwashing of Germans to not take pride in anything they do comes into full effect. Theres nothing wrong with taking pride in certain aspects of your history, especially small things like the performance and name of a tank. No one is telling you to strap on hugo boss and goose step around the parade square, but an acknowledgement of German tank design history is not distasteful.

    • @MintyLime703
      @MintyLime703 Год назад +13

      It's just surprising they'd want to reuse the name. I see nothing wrong with it, but the German government is pretty touchy about WW2.

    • @jacqirius
      @jacqirius Год назад +5

      ​@@EllroyMcBongyour defeatist mindset is at it again hm?

    • @EllroyMcBong
      @EllroyMcBong Год назад +9

      @@jacqirius It seems to me that you don't know the meaning of the word "defeatist". Should you look it up, please also look up the term "Wehrboo". I'm fairly sure that you will read that word quite often in the future regarding you as a person.

  • @johnofbrabant
    @johnofbrabant Год назад +13

    T(h)ank you Mitsi! Top quality content as always! T(h)anks! 💥

  • @dannylojkovic5205
    @dannylojkovic5205 2 месяца назад

    I already knew quite a bit of this information (still learned quite a bit though, like where the name of the tank comes from), but I love these animations and the commentary!

  • @akriegguardsman
    @akriegguardsman Год назад +51

    7:52 what about T-64 and T-80
    There are like 15 T-14 and leopards are quite dissapointing when thrown against well prepared defenses and into a minefield

    • @Chulavoi
      @Chulavoi Год назад +4

      Это да, в чем то мы схожи, леопарды на мины, Т-72 на противотанковые орудия, ведь руководство не может допереть что посылать танки КОЛОННОЙ не выгодно

    • @arcturus4762
      @arcturus4762 Год назад +1

      15 T-14s won't do much. As it is right now, unless total war unleashes again, IFVs are arguably better than proper tanks. The reason most big-bad-cannon tanks were made was to counter other tanks. So in an infantry support scenario, light IFVs with repeating autocannons are much better to field than other tanks. Due to the amount of AT missiles being used (and how most go through the roof), IFVs are just better for now. Tanks will get to shine when there's enough of them to guarantee Tank v Tank battles again.

    • @engineerenginering8633
      @engineerenginering8633 Год назад +2

      the leopards arent dissapointing tho, they are good at taking trenches

    • @ancaplanaoriginal5303
      @ancaplanaoriginal5303 Год назад +1

      @@arcturus4762 most ATGMs aren't top attack.

    • @akriegguardsman
      @akriegguardsman Год назад +3

      @@engineerenginering8633 while an excellent tank no doubt it did suffer many casualties when throw up against prepared defenses and drones in Ukraine

  • @stagle51183
    @stagle51183 Год назад +13

    This time you guys should make "Evolution of Planes" or "Evolution of Submarines". But anyways, every video you make is such a masterpiece. Will wait for the next one

  • @thanakritphaithuncharatrua398
    @thanakritphaithuncharatrua398 Год назад +10

    ขอขอบคุณ

  • @CheerfulJigsawPuzzle-jo9lq
    @CheerfulJigsawPuzzle-jo9lq 9 месяцев назад +1

    At 2:10 I like funny the Germans looked around at little willie when it was stuck in the trench.

  • @atrijaghosh7418
    @atrijaghosh7418 Год назад +43

    It's sad that you missed the Renault ft17, Challengers, T26, Type 10, ztz99 etc. These tanks also had their own stories to tell!!!

    • @thechlebek901
      @thechlebek901 Год назад +4

      we get it, you play war thunder

    • @atrijaghosh7418
      @atrijaghosh7418 Год назад +1

      @@thechlebek901 currently in love with the game!!

    • @flakitohdz30
      @flakitohdz30 Год назад +1

      ​@@thechlebek901 And for good reason too

    • @leprianto4930
      @leprianto4930 Год назад +5

      ​@@thechlebek901it really doesn't matter you can't talk about tanks going from British mark1 to M4 there's a thing called FT17 that changed everything

    • @thechlebek901
      @thechlebek901 Год назад

      @@leprianto4930 The pershing was shown, Type 10 and ZTZ 99 are pointless to show

  • @bittalks11
    @bittalks11 Год назад +14

    I absolutely love the models and animation in this, being both an animator and taking a huge interest in the history of both world wars!

  • @cheesyfromindonesia9969
    @cheesyfromindonesia9969 Год назад +87

    *Panzerlied starts playing*

    • @Wiggasaurus
      @Wiggasaurus Год назад +4

      Ob Stürmt oder schneit
      Ob die sonne uns lacht

    • @t34calliope
      @t34calliope Год назад

      Der Tag glühend heiß
      Oder eiskalt die Nacht.

    • @doowee54
      @doowee54 Год назад

      Verstaubt sind die Gesichter,
      Doch froh ist unser Sinn,

    • @MrPlanesYoutubeAccount
      @MrPlanesYoutubeAccount 3 месяца назад

      Es braust unser Panzer
      Im Sturmwind dahin

    • @MrPlanesYoutubeAccount
      @MrPlanesYoutubeAccount 3 месяца назад

      Mit donnernden Motoren,
      Geschwind wie der Blitz,
      Dem Feinde entgegen,
      Im Panzer geschützt.
      Voraus den Kameraden,
      Im Kampf steh'n wir allein,
      Steh'n wir allein,
      So stoßen wir tief
      In die feindlichen Reih'n.

  • @PPC4
    @PPC4 Год назад +2

    They showed a 'V' engine going into a Sherman, that made me chuckle. There was a reason it was tall...

  • @PaHDoMNblu_4ell
    @PaHDoMNblu_4ell Год назад +10

    "We would see leopard 2 perform"💀
    You mean graveyard for 4 Mykolas?

    • @tankenjoyer9175
      @tankenjoyer9175 9 месяцев назад +1

      man its biased asf, abrams are burning in ukraine rn

    • @iliketoast-q9b
      @iliketoast-q9b 17 часов назад

      Lol, nonsense. Crew survivability is a key features western tanks have been designed for since the cold war. Meanwhile russian tanks hold vraious world records in turret throwing.

  • @squareguy5353
    @squareguy5353 Год назад +9

    The perfect video that could have been sponsored by world of tanks.

    • @Private_jin
      @Private_jin Год назад

      I was expecting one but i was deeply dissapointed

  • @notarmchairhistorian7779
    @notarmchairhistorian7779 Год назад +84

    "Maybe later we'll see how the German leopard tank will perform"
    This has definitely aged nicely.

    • @UnknownLord711
      @UnknownLord711 Год назад +21

      They certainly make good target practice

    • @legolasreich8145
      @legolasreich8145 Год назад +14

      @@UnknownLord711
      like every tank without any infantry

    • @IsaiahRichards692
      @IsaiahRichards692 Год назад +15

      This idea that Russian tanks are target practice is a meme being circulated by Nafo bots! Incompetent armored commanders on both sides in Ukraine are manufacturing tank graveyards by putting their men in the crosshairs of enemy aviation or artillery. But both sides are also proving that tanks aren’t obsolete when used correctly! The Ukrainians in particular are currently experiencing a nightmare scenario of repeated defeats on the frontlines, combined with powerful allies and financial backers that falsely believe their side is winning. Ukraine is receiving all the armor it could ever ask for but the question is whether it’ll all be a waste!

    • @UnknownLord711
      @UnknownLord711 Год назад

      @@IsaiahRichards692 i was talking about the Leopard 2’s

    • @legolasreich8145
      @legolasreich8145 Год назад +9

      @@IsaiahRichards692
      U sound like a pro russian

  • @physanon5327
    @physanon5327 Месяц назад

    The swears in this video actually jumpscare me. Whoever does the voicework has such a nice sounding and calm voice that the swearing catches me off guard every time. It's like hearing a swear in a Kurzgesagt video.

  • @simondemoulin5815
    @simondemoulin5815 Год назад +19

    I like the little touch from Red Alert 3 : the Soviet March OST at the end.
    For the last question, I think the tank still has some use : overall speed in nearly any terrain, better range than the majority of infantry-carried weapons, don't care about enemy bullets (because you can't expect to see every enemy soldier to have a rocket-launcher, so good chance to see them retreat if not well equiped enough), relative resistance against explosions (to a certain degree, of course) compare to civilian building/makeshift trench and defence, capacity to rapidly take and fortify a position,...
    If I can suggest other videos, you can definitely talk about the evolution of airplane (+ zeppelin and helicopter ?) and the evolution of naval battle (early greek, chinese, british,... until today).
    Not the most original propositions, I agree, but you can definitely put some explosions in the video. ^^

  • @mantha6912
    @mantha6912 Год назад +8

    I'm blown away by the animation. I'm a huge tank nerd so I already know all this stuff (including the handful of incorrect things in the video), but I kept watching because of the gorgeous animation.

  • @7h3_man
    @7h3_man Год назад +16

    Excellent work as always

    • @mitsistudio
      @mitsistudio  Год назад +3

      Thanks Darcy! And thanks for the support

    • @shokirbekabdubannobov
      @shokirbekabdubannobov Год назад +5

      ​@@mitsistudioваша русофобия меня зашкаливает 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 но я серезно потомучто там обе сторони оснашени техникам производстви СССР ви говорите что русские танки горит но вы не видели что горит у украинцев
      Редактироват я не за россии и ешё не за украини просто там идёт война двух хорошо организованних армии

    • @sandhamwichs
      @sandhamwichs Год назад

      @@shokirbekabdubannobov and thus the beginning of the youtube comment war has begun

    • @juehju
      @juehju Год назад +2

      @@shokirbekabdubannobov dont worry too much about it, theres so much damn propaganda that almost no one can tell whats going on over there, plus its all jokes and fun in the end. *Remember Comrade, the T series for Russia and USSR are so damn sexy it does not even matter*

    • @shokirbekabdubannobov
      @shokirbekabdubannobov Год назад

      ​@@juehjuСпасибо товариш за совет я признаюс что там много пропаганди от обеих сторон но танки серии Т до сих пор воюют в украине причем на обу строну себя неплохо показал себе на етом войне
      Ещё один раз говорю я нейтралний человек по отношению етой войны в украине❤

  • @anitanavani449
    @anitanavani449 9 месяцев назад +1

    5:30 'you see Ivan,when the tank is flying, the enemy is confused whether to shoot anti tank or anti aircraft gun.'

    • @Mieszkovski
      @Mieszkovski 9 месяцев назад +1

      Meanwhile, the German 8.8 cm anti-aircraft gun which was also used for ground targets:

  • @พิตตินันท์จันทร์ศรี-ว5ฟ

    8:15 "Maybe in the near future, we will see how the German Leopard tanks or their latest 2022 Panther tanks will perform." That aged like milk now because it was reported last month that several Leopard 2 tanks were destroyed and abandoned in Ukraine. Maybe in the near future, we will see how the Abrams will perform against more adequate adversaries, not outdated tanks like T-55s or the Asad Babil tanks (which is a heavily-downgraded T-72) that it faced in Iraq. Will it reign supreme? Or we could see the Abrams being destroyed or towed by Russian tanks, everything is possible.

    • @playersczart9484
      @playersczart9484 Год назад +14

      I wasnt able to understand what most of the Western media and viewers were thinking about when saying that a dozen of tanks will change the war. Ukraine got around 3000 of different vehicles, from MaxPro and IFV's to tanks like Leo 2 and Challenger 2, but as we've seen - all of them burns the same as USSR "old crap". I am silent about the fact, that when you have tanks from Germany, UK, Slovakia, Poland, old USSR tanks and some of your new tanks, this will be a madness for repair crews, because you'll have to find different details for each tank and that means that the repair of any tank will last longer.

    • @thechlebek901
      @thechlebek901 Год назад

      survivability is alien technology to Russia

    • @KJIELIL_BAJIEPA
      @KJIELIL_BAJIEPA 3 дня назад +1

      всё нормально, 20 из 31 переданного абрамса сожжены, можно присылать ещё)

    • @iliketoast-q9b
      @iliketoast-q9b 17 часов назад

      No tank is invincible. The Leopard is reportedly performing as expected, that is to say they are good at what they were designed for. Haven't seen even a single one of them throw a turret yet either where as russian tanks do that with alarming frequency. Also where is the T-14?

  • @MrAdamOOR
    @MrAdamOOR Год назад +73

    Man Leopard 2 did aged well now considering how they perform.

    • @jacob-lf4id
      @jacob-lf4id Год назад +27

      it was just overated they also performed bad in lybria or syria forgot which country

    • @MrAdamOOR
      @MrAdamOOR Год назад +21

      @@jacob-lf4id thats the thing media has been hyping about it, but no tank is invisible. All you need is air power. Ukraine need more air defences more than overrated tanks

    • @ancalagon1144
      @ancalagon1144 Год назад +29

      They're one of the most modern tanks and they're reported to perform as excepted, good. People who judge military vehicles because they've seen videos of them being destroyed deserve prison. You don't know what the tank in question achieved before being destroyed. The same thing applies to Russian tanks.

    • @jacob-lf4id
      @jacob-lf4id Год назад +1

      @@MrAdamOOR lots of kids hyping up their countries mbt. but yea i agree with u totally im a diehard challenger 2 tank and i know it has never been destroyed by enemy fire before but one aps shell to its lower plate or side and its dead

    • @MrAdamOOR
      @MrAdamOOR Год назад +6

      @@ancalagon1144 with open terrain, artillery and most importantly the long range anti missile Ka-52 that makes it look bad. Leopard 2 variation is a good tank but the doctrines they are applying without proper air cover is suicidal. I guess small drones really can decide the tides for now.

  • @Martin-ot6kw
    @Martin-ot6kw Год назад +14

    I do feel like it'd have been interesting to mention the French FT-17, given it was the first produced "normal" turreted design. Nonetheless an interesting video : D

  • @Lechuga1815
    @Lechuga1815 Год назад +99

    The Sherman was amazing engineering. Not only did it succeed in all being effective in combined arms, anti-tank, it was relatively cheap, and mass-produceable. But it had one of the best features for a US produced tank, it was compact and easy to transport. Easily the biggest hurdle to getting a lot of tanks in the war is transporting them across the sea. For a tank that was built across the ocean, it performed very well compared to the home field advantage tanks that Germany and Russia fielded.

    • @m4shermanfan225
      @m4shermanfan225 Год назад +4

      Gaming

    • @lancepharker
      @lancepharker Год назад +15

      They also had a stabilized main gun, which was so top secret, that they... didn't distribute the manuals... to their own troops... sigh.

    • @raketny_hvost
      @raketny_hvost Год назад +4

      Sherman had it's faults for eastern Europe landscapes. However mediums often determined battlefields

    • @stepanchelli4295
      @stepanchelli4295 Год назад

      ahahha, ok )))

    • @robertoroberto9798
      @robertoroberto9798 Год назад +2

      @@lancepharkerThe good news is that if a crew/armoured division knew how to use it, then the Sherman just became even more effective on top of all the other factors. If the crew didn’t know how to use the stabilizer, then the Sherman would be on par with other tanks instead of being worse.

  • @Jonas-ri4dk
    @Jonas-ri4dk Год назад +36

    That visuals are so stunning. Love the content. Which software do you use for 3d modeling and animating this masterpieces? Keep up with this work!

  • @togmor6225
    @togmor6225 Год назад +13

    As usual a true masterpiece. But what about the french? If it wasn´t for the wrong doctrine, the french fielded some remarkable tank designs like the FT-17 and the Char B1

    • @taistelusammakko5088
      @taistelusammakko5088 Год назад

      Char b1 was bad tank, but this channel seems to hate french for some reason

  • @ellyelletidmai7215
    @ellyelletidmai7215 3 месяца назад

    6:06 the Churchill AVRE petard is used to breach fences or break bridges and stuff but the 20 kilogram mortar is called the spigot mortar or nicknamed the flying dustbin and its caliber is 230mm