@@LegoBeachStudios working on explaining that soon for all the globe proponents who parrot this exact response. The cognitive dissonance is crazy! Give the evidence they’ve been screaming for for decades, and instead of saying “wow you actually showed star trails in an FE model”, it’s completely ignored, and the cognitive dissonance immediately fires off a supposed gotcha question. The southern constellations are already pretty self explanatory to anyone who can critically think through this. For some no evidence or explanation will be able to break the brainwashing.
@@josephhanvey5891 "Give the evidence they’ve been screaming for for decades, and instead of saying “wow you actually showed star trails in an FE model”, it’s completely ignored, and the cognitive dissonance immediately fires off a supposed gotcha question." Lol, no. You've failed to provide evidence of anything and none of your whining about "cognitive dissonance" or "supposed gotchas" changes that. It appears that you are filming the starfield refracting through a transparent dome. Obvious problems: 1. You didn't actually show star trails in an FE model. You showed something that might LOOK like star trails from some points on the FE model, but would be very much not visible from the other points where it should be visible. The rotation of the southern starfield and the pole is visible from all points south of the equator. The VERY obvious problem with your model is that as you have demonstrated, the "south pole" would only be visible from one side of the Southern hemisphere and not from the other. 2. You're the one completely ignoring that the starfield in the southern hemisphere is very different from the one in the northern hemisphere. What YOU have demonstrated is what should be identical (though reversed) starfields rotating in opposite directions. That's obviously not what the night sky looks like in the southern hemisphere. Keep at it though! One of these days I'm sure you'll stumble on the answer!
@@josephhanvey5891you were asked a very straightforward question which you deflected with 2 uses of “cognitive dissonance” - a phrase that no self-respecting adult will use - and that you’re “working on it”. You’re a sad attention seeking narcissist. Give the requestor a straight answer. Or answer why the same stars which form opposing direction trails slightly north or south of the equator are vertical at the equator.
Wait a minute. Aren't you seeing the closer circle of stars from the perspective of the outside of the dome but the farther circle of stars from the perspective of inside of the dome? That's what it looks to me at 0:37. If you were looking at both of them from the same side, you'd see them both rotating clockwise.
@@SharingCaring-u1f I’ve got videos with pics from inside showing all three zones at once northern, southern, and equatorial trails. Not only that it creates the same phenomenon with the sun… which causes the 24 hour apparent anti arc sun in Antarctica past the Antarctic circle. The celestial dome and sky system of our flat earth explains all of the celestial phenomena.
@@josephhanvey5891 I think the most confusing thing is that we're never seeing them all of these things you are talking about working together at once. For example, you have a recent video titled "Day and night zones in the level earth enclosed universe model" that shows different star rotations from the same side of the dome. However, the two sets of stars are moving in the same counter clockwise direction, and the view straight up from the equator would show stars right next to each other moving in completely opposite directions across the sky. That isn't an accurate representation of what we see from the earth; you only gave us an example of what you would see if you're looking through the dome from the outside of it. Like I said in my original comment that you first replied to, the example you have in the video we're commenting on actually has the two star fields rotating in the same rotational direction because the view we have shows us the stars closer to us from an outside-the-dome perspective and the stars further from us from an inside-the-dome perspective. You zoom away from the dome and it looks normal from one hemisphere's perspective, but when you zoom in and if you were to place your camera in the middle of the earth and look up at that dome, you'd see two star whirlpools right next to each other rotating in the same direction. Showing us a view that looks correct from anywhere other than on the surface of the earth doesn't work, because it doesn't mimic what we actually see from where we are. You've got another video titled "The Anti-arc-tic 24 hour apparent Sun does work within the level earth enclosed universe model." How does the sun ever eventually set on that model? How does the sun appear to do a circle all the way around people standing in Antarctica while at a low angle the entire time? All we see in that video is that you can make a reflection move in a counter-clockwise circle on the side of the dome, but it doesn't come even close to mimicking what they actually observed on TFE. This is why these videos don't work. There's always something not quite accurate. Then you come out with another one that is set up slightly differently, but that one has something different that isn't quite accurate as a result. You do need to have a camera on the outside of the dome to show us what your setup is, but in a video like this one or the day and night zones one, the placement of your camera does not show it working from the perspective of a human on the earth, which is the one thing that HAS to work for your model to be relevant.
Thank you for doing these incredible experiments. God bless 🙏
Also, what star projector is this? I'd love to get one for my room!
outstanding ty
How do you explain the completely different stars seen in the Southern Hemisphere?
@@LegoBeachStudios working on explaining that soon for all the globe proponents who parrot this exact response. The cognitive dissonance is crazy! Give the evidence they’ve been screaming for for decades, and instead of saying “wow you actually showed star trails in an FE model”, it’s completely ignored, and the cognitive dissonance immediately fires off a supposed gotcha question.
The southern constellations are already pretty self explanatory to anyone who can critically think through this.
For some no evidence or explanation will be able to break the brainwashing.
@@josephhanvey5891 "Give the evidence they’ve been screaming for for decades, and instead of saying “wow you actually showed star trails in an FE model”, it’s completely ignored, and the cognitive dissonance immediately fires off a supposed gotcha question."
Lol, no. You've failed to provide evidence of anything and none of your whining about "cognitive dissonance" or "supposed gotchas" changes that.
It appears that you are filming the starfield refracting through a transparent dome. Obvious problems:
1. You didn't actually show star trails in an FE model. You showed something that might LOOK like star trails from some points on the FE model, but would be very much not visible from the other points where it should be visible. The rotation of the southern starfield and the pole is visible from all points south of the equator. The VERY obvious problem with your model is that as you have demonstrated, the "south pole" would only be visible from one side of the Southern hemisphere and not from the other.
2. You're the one completely ignoring that the starfield in the southern hemisphere is very different from the one in the northern hemisphere. What YOU have demonstrated is what should be identical (though reversed) starfields rotating in opposite directions. That's obviously not what the night sky looks like in the southern hemisphere.
Keep at it though! One of these days I'm sure you'll stumble on the answer!
@@josephhanvey5891you were asked a very straightforward question which you deflected with 2 uses of “cognitive dissonance” - a phrase that no self-respecting adult will use - and that you’re “working on it”. You’re a sad attention seeking narcissist. Give the requestor a straight answer. Or answer why the same stars which form opposing direction trails slightly north or south of the equator are vertical at the equator.
I challenge you to make a steelman model of how startrails work on a globe.
Sooo incredible. This makes sense.
This is the ⛽
Thanks man
Wait a minute. Aren't you seeing the closer circle of stars from the perspective of the outside of the dome but the farther circle of stars from the perspective of inside of the dome? That's what it looks to me at 0:37. If you were looking at both of them from the same side, you'd see them both rotating clockwise.
@@SharingCaring-u1f I’ve got videos with pics from inside showing all three zones at once northern, southern, and equatorial trails. Not only that it creates the same phenomenon with the sun… which causes the 24 hour apparent anti arc sun in Antarctica past the Antarctic circle.
The celestial dome and sky system of our flat earth explains all of the celestial phenomena.
@@josephhanvey5891 I think the most confusing thing is that we're never seeing them all of these things you are talking about working together at once. For example, you have a recent video titled "Day and night zones in the level earth enclosed universe model" that shows different star rotations from the same side of the dome. However, the two sets of stars are moving in the same counter clockwise direction, and the view straight up from the equator would show stars right next to each other moving in completely opposite directions across the sky. That isn't an accurate representation of what we see from the earth; you only gave us an example of what you would see if you're looking through the dome from the outside of it.
Like I said in my original comment that you first replied to, the example you have in the video we're commenting on actually has the two star fields rotating in the same rotational direction because the view we have shows us the stars closer to us from an outside-the-dome perspective and the stars further from us from an inside-the-dome perspective. You zoom away from the dome and it looks normal from one hemisphere's perspective, but when you zoom in and if you were to place your camera in the middle of the earth and look up at that dome, you'd see two star whirlpools right next to each other rotating in the same direction. Showing us a view that looks correct from anywhere other than on the surface of the earth doesn't work, because it doesn't mimic what we actually see from where we are.
You've got another video titled "The Anti-arc-tic 24 hour apparent Sun does work within the level earth enclosed universe model." How does the sun ever eventually set on that model? How does the sun appear to do a circle all the way around people standing in Antarctica while at a low angle the entire time? All we see in that video is that you can make a reflection move in a counter-clockwise circle on the side of the dome, but it doesn't come even close to mimicking what they actually observed on TFE.
This is why these videos don't work. There's always something not quite accurate. Then you come out with another one that is set up slightly differently, but that one has something different that isn't quite accurate as a result. You do need to have a camera on the outside of the dome to show us what your setup is, but in a video like this one or the day and night zones one, the placement of your camera does not show it working from the perspective of a human on the earth, which is the one thing that HAS to work for your model to be relevant.
Can you show us what it looks like from inside the dome, and not just from outside ?
❤❤❤❤❤
Wooow 👍