Saying the Eastern Orthodox church started in 1054 AD isnt the most accurate and I am saying that as a maronite catholic. It would probably be more accurate to say both the catholic and eastern orthodox church started in the first century and were united until 1054.
@Scary Scores well your "al-lah" says that we are "kafir" and that your not allowed to be friends with Jews or Christian.. oh and doesn't jahannam have a special place for Christians???
I am simply a Christian man🌿✝️🌿, I love all Denominations. Because they all acknowledge and believe that Christ is the Redeemer. They all acknowledge and believe that he is the WAY, the TRUTH and the LIFE. 😊
But not all believe in the power of the gifts of the Holy Spirit, and outright disrespect the Holy Spirit. In that sense, they don't teach the truth and are to be avoided at all costs, because their teachings do not align with scripture (or Jesus's sayings).
As long as you live out what Jesus called you to do and the epistles say to do as a Christian, im cool with a certain group emphasizing certain areas. But if some outright deny scripture (like trinity: god is 1 and 3) or add to it (catholics idolizing mary or mormons having multiple wives and idolizing their leader dude) thatsss when I start to get a little creeped out.
can 2 persons walk together unless they agree Amos 3v 3 you christians are divided with each others and don’t even understand and follow simple sound Biblical teachings of the Christ Jesus
Shouldn't the Catholic and Orthodox churches start at the same time, whether that's 30AD or 1054AD? Even though they only split officially in the 11th century, they grew parallel to one another, and it's misleading to imply that the Roman Catholic Church has a thousand year head start on the Eastern Orthodox.
tyep, he first church was the orthodox antioch church and not the catholic church yes. the catholic church came to be after one bishop in rome declared himself superior, while all the power lay in the eastern part of rome around 250 ad or so, as far as I know.
first numbers were wrong sadly, the first church was the orthodox antioch church and not the catholic church yes. the catholic church came to be after one bishop in rome declared himself superior, while all the power lay in the eastern part of rome around 250 ad or so, as far as I know.
NGL same 😂. They're... interesting. Shall we read from the Book of Sherman? Or 3 Meqabyan? Or perhaps one of the 20 that the Ethiopians call non-canonical?
I am Orthodox and it does not matter to me which church I go to. The most important thing is that the church, regardless of the sect, is a place to worship the Lord, and it is the house of the angels.❤
@@lecoeurjeannette435 I am Orthodox, my dear There's no reason to lie about something like that Mainly because our Lord Jesus Christ did not specify a specific denomination He gave us his name. We are called Christians because we are followers of Christ This is why I have no motive or difference between sects, no matter how different their rituals are. I have nothing but Christ, and the Church is my house of angels. As for distinguishing between sects and following the rituals of sects, it is not in my vocabulary in life. I just follow Christ It is true that I am Orthodox, but I do not distinguish between churches I do not accept a picture or statue And I do not like that the glory of Christ when healing a person or a miracle be given to anyone else, even the saints, because there is no salvation in anyone else except through Jesus Christ.
First of the Catholic church isn't older than the Orthodox church and secondly in 30 AD most of the early Christians still considered themselves messianic Jews.
I also want to be Atheist only I can not manage out - missing origin of life without God _ can you explain to me logically how to be Atheist but not because you reply to me I love to be Atheist because who care what _ so how to be Atheist logically _ I do not love religions that is why I`m are Atheist - who care what you hate what you love is not logical explanation _ if you say there is not God, this is Evolution - for Evolution you need Globe Earth and you can not prove on no way, except bunch of lies and propaganda _ USA are on Moon - ah what USA claim here everything shall be questionable whole life Russia is what ever in space ah they also are not brave boys whole time China ah etc etc _ so you do not known at all origin of live and claim no God - no that is no way is stupidity
I mean, technically, Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons aren't part of the mainstream Christianity and are often considered heretical. Nonetheless, this is a really good video summarizing every church concisely and is easy to understand. Thank you.
Both of them go against the Bible. the Mormons added to scripture and believe in 3 distinct, separate Gods. The Jehovah's witnesses deny the trinity, and are therefore in heresy.
@@filokbobdragon1397 Najważniejsze by kierować się Biblią jako pierwszym źródłem, a później starym Kościołem z lat apostołów i wczesnych ojców Kościoła.
@@rhys09876 We don't prefer to be called Mormons. It would be nice if you would call us Latter-day Saints, instead of an offensive nickname created by the people who hated our church in the early 19th century.
Technically, Catholicism also has appeared in 1054. Before - it was simply Christianity, having two main centers, with some differences in theology, but still undivided and common. Moreover, if one of them continues the original tradition, is much more Orthodox Christianity, than Catholicism, being closer to the first Christian believers...
@@lain7758 Catholicism is quite far from what the first Christians believe. F.e. St. Paul stated in his 1st Epistle to Timothy, that bishops and diacons should be, among other, a husband of one wife, because how could anyone care about the God's Church, if he can not take care of his own home and family. How many Catholic priests do have wifes and families?
@@lain7758 yes, some are uncapable, but they shouldn't become priests. Anyway, Catholicism has changed so much during millenia, that it has not much common with the Christ's teaching. The Eastern and Orthodox Churches are much closer to it.
@@avtandil the recommendations in 1 Timothy 3:2 are pretty much omissive in nature. God has spoken, it's up to us to interpret His teachings correctly.
@@rozlinchristian1106 Nope. If you don't believe Jesus is God, you are not a Christian. If you don't believe that Jesus died and rose again, you aren't a Christian. If you don't believe in the Trinity, you aren't a Christian. Other beliefs that you shouldn't believe (unscriptural): You shouldn't pray to saints. You shouldn't pray to Mary. You shouldn't make statues of people (that's idolization - as is praying to them). Other things you CAN do: Read aprocyphal/pseudepigraphical works (nowhere in scripture does it say you cannot - but it DOES reference it).
@@Fortunately_Existing that s what i thought too , the majority of moroccans and algerians are muslims and the minority are jewish but Christians are just european ppl who live with us
Really enjoyable and informative short video🙌 however, it is commonly agreed upon that Jehowas Witnesses and the Church of Mormon falls outside the definiton of Christianity, as they have their own separate religious books, and denies the holy trinity.
@@rolyjosephs4797 but they still have their own book called the Book of Mormon. Just like how Christians have the old testament (Torah) and the new testament (the Bible). If Christians didn’t have the New Testament, they would have been called Jews. So that why many people believe you guys to be different religions
@@giovannigiorgio2262 what your allah said in alquran? Muhammad and all Muslims going to hell. i give you the verse from your satanic book alquran if you don't know.
Our eastern orthodox brothers are not gonna like that you refer to them as splitting from the Roman Catholics when it is the Roman Catholics who split from them(in their view)
Well when you originally had 5 main seats of the church and 5 equal patriarchs but one of them decides he is above the others and starts implementing new dogma, I would say it is that one that has split from the others. And the orthodox church has existed well before 1054 AD. Just for reference the Bulgarian orthodox church was founded in 870 AD and received patriarchal status in 919 AD and those of Antioch, Alexandria, Jerusalem and Konstantinopol are way way older and were never under the patriarch of Rome (the pope) authority.
@@s.y.s6030 I believe the Eastern Orthodox church to be the one true catholic church as well, I'm just trying to provide a neutral view unlike the video.
technically if you look back to the good ol' days you'll see that when they changed that part of the creed they were like "under whos authority did ya'll do that" and the response was "the pope's" and they didnt like that (historically the church would hold an ecumenical council over changes such as these) also ya'll changed the name ("orthodox") plus Catholicism has the bigger population (by 1 billion💀) and is basically universally accepted as the OG church
@@e-1074 Just because something has a bigger following, doesn't make it any truthful. The orthodox church was able to preserve its original dogmas and traditions while being under Muslim rule for over 5 centuries while the catholic church despite having the resources and access to the colonies of the Western powers has changed its views with every new pope. I would like to ask how does the pope's infallibility work when there are popes who blatantly contradict their predecessors and even condemn some to be heretics when under this central to the catholic church dogma every pope should be right. And also it was the pope who made the changes with the Filioque.
*PHILIPPINE INDEPENDENT CHURCH* FOUNDED 1902 AD As part of the Philippine Revolution, founded on the principles of Philippine nationalism within the clergy.
Catholic here, and I disagree that you listed the Eastern Orthodox Church founding at 1054, while listing Roman Catholic at 33 AD... If you ask me, both churches only existed in 1054, if not the exact reverse of what you listed, since before they split in that year, both the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches were one, single church, called the Imperial Church of Rome, or more simply, just "the Church"... They originally have 3 major patriarchates and each patriarchate celebrate using different rites, the Latin/Roman Rite used by the Patriarchate of Rome, the Syriac/Antiochene Rite used by the Patriarchate of Antioch, and the Coptic/Alexandrian Rite used by the Patriarchate of Alexandria... The Patriarchate of Constantinople was later added using the Greek/Byzantine Rite, and later, the Patriarchate of Jerusalem using the same rite... However, there were other rites used, such as the Armenian rite used by the Armenian Apostolic Church, and although this church participated in the early councils of the Imperial Church (despite Armenia being an independent kingdom), later on, they stopped participating... However, their authority and legitimacy was still recognized by the patriarchs of the Imperial Church... Later, the Patriarchate of Alexandria was the first of the 5 patriarchates to experience schism, splitting into the newly-formed Coptic Orthodox Church, and the Church of Alexandria that remained in communion with the other 4 patriarchates of the Imperial Church... Then later, it was the Patriarchate of Antioch, splitting into the newly-formed Syriac Orthodox Church, and the Church of Antioch that remained in communion with the other 4 patriarchates of the Imperial Church... Then later, the biggest schism of all happened in 1054, called the "Great Schism", where the Patriarchate of Rome and Patriarchate of Constantinople excommunicated each other... The 3 other patriarchates of the Imperial Church, the Church of Alexandria, the Church of Antioch, and the Patriarchate of Jerusalem all supported the Patriarch of Constatinople, essentially isolating the Patriarch of Rome... This was due to the arrogance of the Roman patriarch into thinking that they can just single-handedly change a church doctrine and impose it upon the other patriarchates without calling an ecumenical council... Soo, basically, it was actually the Church of Rome that separated from the Imperial Church, and not the other way around... The 4 churches/patriarchates of the Imperial Church that remained in communion with each other later on became the Holy Orthodox Catholic Church, or more commonly known as the Eastern Orthodox Church, while the Church of Rome would later become the Roman Catholic Church... Soo basically, if there's one of the 2 churches that closer to being the "successor" to the Imperial Church, it would be the Eastern Orthodox, and not the Roman Catholic Church... And again, I'm saying this as a Roman Catholic... The thing about the Roman Catholic Church is that numerous changes and reforms were implemented... Many of the ancient practices of the early Imperial Church were lost and changed due to the Catholic reforms, which is just unfortunate... One such large reform that changed alot from the church was the Counter-Reformation campaign... Practices that were removed/added to the Church during this time included was the added use of the musical instrument "organ" to the liturgy, something that was never used before... Another is the removal of the use of local languages, and enforcing the use of Latin in every single liturgical service, even when the congregation doesn't even understand Latin... Another is enforcing the use of shape of "Latin cross" on every church building, and disapproving the use of the earlier-used "Greek cross-shaped" church buildings, which was used all throughout the Roman Empire during the ancient times... Another is the removal of the use of "rood screens", which is a screen barrier that separates the nave/congregation from the sanctuary/altar in order to preserve the sanctity of the altar... It was something that was, again, used all throughout the Roman Empire during the ancient times, but its use was disapproved during the counter-reformation campaigns... The counterpart of these "rood screens" in the Eastern Orthodox Church is the "iconostasis", which served a similar purpose... And then, another such large reforms was the introduction of the "Novus Ordo" during the 2nd Vatican Council during the 20th Century... This remove basically removed all sense or "ancientness" from the church... Meanwhile, the Eastern Orthodox Church never had a single large reform since the Schism, preserving all ancient traditions and rituals in the liturgy...
@@stevenmora0017 The thing with Old Believers is that they refused to drop some rituals whose origins can be traced back to Russian pagan rituals of old, and refused to adapt to the "integration" of the Russian church with the rest of the Eastern Orthodoxy... This disparity in rituals between the Russian church and the rest of Eastern Orthodoxy can be traced back to the formation of the Moscow Patriarchate itself, because the patriarchate in Moscow was established independently, without approval or guidance from the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople... Because of this, the Moscow Patriarchate was misled and therefore, became a Christian church with Russian pagan elements, as opposed to the purely Christian practices of the rest of Eastern Orthodoxy... Along with this syncretization, came the mistranslation of scriptures and misinterpretation of doctrines... So to fix this, and to further integrate the Russian church with the rest of Eastern Orthodoxy, a council of bishops was called by the Patriarch of Moscow and Tsar of Russia, and along with the Russian bishops, they also invited delegations not just from the Ecumenical Patriarchate, but also from the Patriarchate of Jerusalem and Patriarchate of Alexandria, to guide the Russian church to the right path... However, the changes and resolutions that came out of the councils were rejected by the so-called "Old Believers", or the conservative minority who wants to preserve the old Russian traditions, even if they're not purely Christian... Thus, the Moscow Patriarchate continued to be in communion with the rest of Eastern Orthodoxy, except for those so-called Old Believers who continued some of their pagan-origin practices, and continued to use their mistranslated and misinterpreted doctrines and scriptures, as opposed to the ones revised by the council to match those used by the rest of Eastern Orthodoxy... So technically, the Old Believers are not legitimate, and therefore heretics, in the eyes of the Eastern Orthodox Church... The Old Calendarist however, along with the so-called "True Orthodox", were born mainly out of socio-political, and not religious or theological issues... The Old Calendarists, as seen from their name, split from mainstream Eastern Orthodoxy because they refused to adapt the Gregorian calendar, or the Revised Julian calendar, which are updated calendars and therefore more accurate, as opposed to the Old Julian calendar used by the so-called Old Calendarists... Meanwhile, the "True Orthodox" was formed mainly by the anti-communist clergy, who opposed all forms of socialism and views the ideology as anti-Christian... Most True Orthodox factions splitted from the Russian Orthodox Church after the Moscow Patriarchate supported the formation of the Soviet Union, however, True Orthodox factions also emerged from other communist countries outside of the ROC sphere... Most True Orthodox are also Old Calendarists by nature, meaning, they also dont accept the Gregorian calendar or the revised version of the Julian calendar... So these Old Calendarists and True Orthodox are considered by mainstream Eastern Orthodoxy as schismatics, and therefore, heretics, just like the Old Believers...
Only Eastern Orthodox church is original and truth Christianity which have continuity related to the root of Christianity. All denomination should back to Orthodox church truth dogmatics. Wish you all the best. ☦️
I grew up Baptist/ non-denominational. It’s seems Presbyterians run the church most inline with the way the Bible instructs. The best ones in my San Antonio fall under PCA. I watched the online service on Sunday. I’m taking my family in person next week. Lutheran was my second choice but it felt a bit too Catholic (the choreographed phrases and responses).
the first church was the orthodox antioch church and not the catholic church. the catholic church came to be after one bishop in rome declared himself superior, while all the power lay in the eastern part of rome around 250 ad or so.
Im thinking of becoming a Christian but im still quite hesitant and scared and also overwhelmed by the choices of Christianity. What would you recommend without using your own bias?
I'd just read the Bible and the Holy Spirit will guide you through it. I'm non-denominational. We are insistent on teaching the Bible without a denominational lens.
@@reyanaaluI can definitely respect and agree with the sentiment. Also I don't know if this is just pop culture nonsense but is it true that some people of the book (though not actual Muslims) might be given the chance to ascend to heaven? While I'm asking what exactly is the general Islamic opinion on christ? From what I've read it goes in to radical extremes so if you can help clarify that'd be amazing. 😁 Have a great day!
2:57 JW here, that church has a cross on the flagstone! We don't believe use the cross. We actually take place in average library-like buildings for our meetings. 🙂 Love y'all. And remember, James 1:17
The older your church is, it's more likely to be a true church since all of the old heretic churches went extinct over time and new heresies started to pop up in modern times.
But that's not the exact date of catholic church btw. Before great schism church in Rome was not the same as it is after the great schism, filioque, non leavened bread, cardinals, papal supremacy, etc. Some webs says they came from 33 because they have a list of bishops in Rome (that every Orthodox, oriental Orthodox, Anglican, Assyrian, etc. Also have) and mostly because they state that doctrine in that way. Btw I'm not saying catholic church came from nowhere, but definitely is not more old that other churches, but it's a development of the latin church in Rome through centuries, as Orthodox is a development in Constantinople and Greek world, and Lutheran in Germany, and anglicans in England
@@matiasgamalieltolmosuarez790 The Roman Church and the Greek church were two separate churches with different cultures that were in communion before the Great Schism. The schism doesn't separate one single church into two. What happened was that the churches in communion broke away from the communion. Lutheran and Anglican churches don't have any apostolic succession at all.
@@anycyclopedia are u kidding me?? So there wasn't any christian living in England before schism ?? And what about Germany, Scandinavia?? Of course Germany and Scandinavia were christianized centuries after reformation, but by BISHOPS WITH APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION. Or do u think Christianity never came to north Europe in a valid way??? The archbishop of Canterbury, York, Magdenburg, Bremen, Uppsala, Dubin, and all the bishops (Lubeck, Meissen, etc.) who accepted the reformation were the same valid as the bishops who rejected the reformation. By your logic just the ancient Territory of Roman empire would be "apostolic" but other places Christianized after are Not apostolic???
The timeline of the early churches isn't the most accurate. Actually it's the Catholic perspective, while Orthodox would tell you that the Orthodox Church existed since 30 AD and that the Roman Catholics separated in 1054.
It's byzantine churches, it's not right to call chalcedonian churches as orthodox. Only the Oriental Orthodox who follows the christological formula of cyril can call themselves orthodox
You can definitely look to the Early Eastern Church Father's, like St. Chrysostom, St. Basil, and many others for this! While the Early Church appears to go either way on the subject of Papal Supremacy, we can definitely say that there were local bishops under Patriarchs that all met in Councils to define dogma and settle theological, sacramental, and practical disputes. The Bishop of Rome was typically present and given authority during these meetings. The Eastern Church was thus highly structured and emphasized ritual, which more often than not remains today!
Yup, this is why I tried to be objective in my response. I have my own interpretation, but I'm not about to get on the internet and wade through this ages - old debate :)
Only opinion, I'm not pretend to the absolute truth!!! They were Early Christians. Neither ortodox nor catholic. But, as far as they admit the pope (for example, in the Orthodox church there are some canonised popes before 1054, as I know), in 1054 the east Christians had broken away from the church that after that situation was named catholic.
the orthodox and catholic churches were united together until 1054 AD, the schism divided them, a better start date for them both would be ~33 AD, on this day actually June 4th, Holy Pentecost
I find it funny that this video is biased by declaring that the Catholic church is the one that started in 30 AD and the Eastern Orthodox Church split off from it.
I am a Christian that loves the display of the Catholic churches with their murals, but accepts the Bible as truth over individuals that become misguided christians, so I have protestant characteristics, but i believe Gods & Jesus kingdom is only 1 Faction that makes a whole to people united under doing Christian missions & preaching the truth - not multiple churches. You either please Jesus or are not following his ways to the letter 📙
The official name is "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints". Mormon is an old fashioned slur given to us in the 19th century by people who hated us.
There are a lot of disputable historical info again. Why Catholic Church exist since 30 AD, but Orthodox only since 1054? And the same bout Church of the East... Sadly, there's no info on Old-Believers and Uniatiс Churches.
Before 1054 Orthodox and Catholicism was as one. But Rome broke out in 1054 from the east and created a lot of problems that created Protestantism. Instead Eastern Church - Orthodox has remained in the ancient traditions of Christianity and is a correct church that, more than others, is closer to the Apostolic Faith
How can u say roman catholic church as 30 ad but then go on to say oriental and eastern orthodox and church of the east came later. All 4 were part of the original church they all originated from the beginning itself
The good thing about the church in Cleveland was that there was no sus or zombified activities there and no Siren Head is intruding because the power of Jesus, AMEN
It may have bothered me too much that you've said that Roman Catholic church started at 30AD, while Easter Orthodox was founded at 1054. While I do think this is exactly backwards from reality, you could have used a more neutral language to say that both were united until the split in 1054. I had to dislike it for this. New people might conclude that Catholic church was the only one from the time of Christ. The way you handled other orthodox churches wasn't great either.
Right, Christian congregations that started in the first century AD could hardly be considered to be what is today Catholics. In fact, Catholicism, as well as Orthodoxy, reformed Christianity so much that Protestants emerged in the Middle Ages pointing out that the Christianity (of the Church) had strayed away from the teachings of the scriptures, adoping non-Biblical and even pagan mythology.
If you put the Roman Chatolic Church on 30 Ad, you should also put The Orthodox, because not way that Church has been just since 1054. You lack a lor o Knownladge here...
Its absolutely wrong to divide Christianity into different parts. We all just need to follow Jesus Christ and unite for those Christian who suffering different hardship .We are just a christian or not anything and follow only one Jesus .So ,way we are divided in to so many different parts.
Do you really think that Jesus has waited until 1863 to tell us that all the other religions were wrong and that his Apostoles had mistaken to teach their faith?
He said Church of the East which is think he is referring to the Eastern Catholic Church, and the Greek Catholic Church is part of the Eastern Catholic Church.
What denomination or tradition of Christianity do you identify with?
im atheist,formaly orthodox
I'm roman Catholic Church ⛪
@@A_G_w_R come to Catholicism, we have cookies
non-denominational but close to baptist and anabaptist
Catholic
Saying the Eastern Orthodox church started in 1054 AD isnt the most accurate and I am saying that as a maronite catholic. It would probably be more accurate to say both the catholic and eastern orthodox church started in the first century and were united until 1054.
Yeah...
Well said
Same for the Church of the East and the Oriental Orthodox
Yes it is truth the Pope said it , Catholic Church is just 1 western and eastern cause we have the same faith
Considering the Nicene creed discusses "One holy, catholic, and apostolic church" that would be correct. The Orthodox are catholic, but not roman.
Danish born protestant and love all branches of Christianity ☦️✝️🙏
God bless u, I'm Chilean protestant, from the Methodist and Pentecostal tradition 🥰
United yet divided , divided yet united. 😢😔
i am Catholic i love Jesus as my God but also i live his holy mother mary
@@CamiloOsSan How is Mary the mother of Jesus ?
@@nehalmanayathara1481 Really?
I am Catholic!
Peace and Goodwill to every Christian born of good hearts!
Same
Proud Roman Catholic 🇻🇦🇻🇦🇻🇦
Im a muslim but i respect Christian ✝️ ☦️
No, you don‘t!
I'm Christian and respect muslim 😊
@@ofanatema6457 Persecution of Christians Today?
@Scary Scores well your "al-lah" says that we are "kafir" and that your not allowed to be friends with Jews or Christian.. oh and doesn't jahannam have a special place for Christians???
@@kingjames.4715 jesus disse para amar nossos inimigos... não esqueça irmão
I am simply a Christian man🌿✝️🌿, I love all Denominations. Because they all acknowledge and believe that Christ is the Redeemer. They all acknowledge and believe that he is the WAY, the TRUTH and the LIFE. 😊
So what are you
But not all believe in the power of the gifts of the Holy Spirit, and outright disrespect the Holy Spirit.
In that sense, they don't teach the truth and are to be avoided at all costs, because their teachings do not align with scripture (or Jesus's sayings).
As long as you live out what Jesus called you to do and the epistles say to do as a Christian, im cool with a certain group emphasizing certain areas. But if some outright deny scripture (like trinity: god is 1 and 3) or add to it (catholics idolizing mary or mormons having multiple wives and idolizing their leader dude) thatsss when I start to get a little creeped out.
can 2 persons walk together unless they agree Amos 3v 3
you christians are divided with each others and don’t even understand and follow simple sound Biblical teachings of the Christ Jesus
Many Christian churches, but our unity in faith in Jesus Christ is what matters
There are too many Christian religions through ridiculous. That means it’s corrupted.
Shouldn't the Catholic and Orthodox churches start at the same time, whether that's 30AD or 1054AD? Even though they only split officially in the 11th century, they grew parallel to one another, and it's misleading to imply that the Roman Catholic Church has a thousand year head start on the Eastern Orthodox.
tyep, he first church was the orthodox antioch church and not the catholic church yes. the catholic church came to be after one bishop in rome declared himself superior, while all the power lay in the eastern part of rome around 250 ad or so, as far as I know.
I'm Mormon and i can say that is accurate the only thing he didn't say about our beliefs is that we also read the KJV bible
He said: "in addition to Bible.". Details don't matter like which version of Bible is when you want to shortcut.
it doesn't matter what church you go i am an Egyptian orthodox christian & I respect all the branches of christianity .
Hello cousin, I am from Lebanon 🇱🇧🙏🏻🇪🇬
I'm fron Egypt too, we are called Coptic Orthodox (part of oriental orthodoxy)
@@medhatmekhael6763 Why don't y'all have a full copy of y'all's Bible fr? And translate it to English when you get it pls
I'm an Atheist, but I still respect all Christians especially my Mom and Step-Dad who are born-again Christians! ⚛️
wait what , step dad 🤣🤣
Yeah atheists don't have much respect for religions usually…
@@ayush_d17 so?
We pray that you find your back to Christ before life comes to an end.
@@ayush_d17yea.. it’s not like it’s a normal thing..
as a christian, I was expecting this video to be innaccurate or mediocre but this was really good
Me too , western atheirst RUclipsrs use to be anti christians for sure
@@CamiloOsSan yes
it is inaccurate regarding Eastern Orthodoxy
It is inaccurate
first numbers were wrong sadly, the first church was the orthodox antioch church and not the catholic church yes. the catholic church came to be after one bishop in rome declared himself superior, while all the power lay in the eastern part of rome around 250 ad or so, as far as I know.
As a Protestant, my favorite denomination is the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church.
respect
😊
NGL same 😂. They're... interesting.
Shall we read from the Book of Sherman?
Or 3 Meqabyan? Or perhaps one of the 20 that the Ethiopians call non-canonical?
Though an agnostic I love the learning about religions and beliefs
Catholic, I love Jesus
I am Orthodox and it does not matter to me which church I go to. The most important thing is that the church, regardless of the sect, is a place to worship the Lord, and it is the house of the angels.❤
Same, I'm Orthodox to but feel very comfortable praying and attending services of Catholic and especially Anglican churches.
Me too, I'm Catholic, but I very value your denomination's liturgies, full of Holy Spirit.
Ребята, вы не православные😞
@@lecoeurjeannette435
I am Orthodox, my dear
There's no reason to lie about something like that
Mainly because our Lord Jesus Christ did not specify a specific denomination
He gave us his name. We are called Christians because we are followers of Christ
This is why I have no motive or difference between sects, no matter how different their rituals are. I have nothing but Christ, and the Church is my house of angels. As for distinguishing between sects and following the rituals of sects, it is not in my vocabulary in life.
I just follow Christ
It is true that I am Orthodox, but I do not distinguish between churches
I do not accept a picture or statue
And I do not like that the glory of Christ when healing a person or a miracle be given to anyone else, even the saints, because there is no salvation in anyone else except through Jesus Christ.
@@loooliiioo, храни Вас Господь ❤
I am proud Protestant ✝️
First of the Catholic church isn't older than the Orthodox church and secondly in 30 AD most of the early Christians still considered themselves messianic Jews.
I'm an Atheist but I liked the information provided in the video. Nice work Nerd Robot.
I also want to be Atheist only I can not manage out
- missing origin of life without God
_
can you explain to me logically how to be Atheist but not because you reply to me I love to be Atheist because who care what
_
so how to be Atheist logically
_
I do not love religions that is why I`m are Atheist
- who care what you hate what you love is not logical explanation
_
if you say there is not God, this is Evolution
- for Evolution you need Globe Earth and you can not prove on no way, except bunch of lies and propaganda
_
USA are on Moon
- ah what USA claim here everything shall be questionable whole life
Russia is what ever in space ah they also are not brave boys whole time
China ah
etc etc
_
so you do not known at all origin of live and claim no God
- no that is no way is stupidity
I mean, technically, Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons aren't part of the mainstream Christianity and are often considered heretical. Nonetheless, this is a really good video summarizing every church concisely and is easy to understand. Thank you.
Both of them go against the Bible. the Mormons added to scripture and believe in 3 distinct, separate Gods. The Jehovah's witnesses deny the trinity, and are therefore in heresy.
I tak niewiadomo, która religia podoba się Bogu najbardziej
Uważam również jako Świadek Jehowy, że Mormonowie to głupie świnie i nawet niech nie próbują się nam dorównywać
@@filokbobdragon1397 Najważniejsze by kierować się Biblią jako pierwszym źródłem, a później starym Kościołem z lat apostołów i wczesnych ojców Kościoła.
@@__________________________5338 a myślisz, że co robią Świadkowie Jehowy?
2:40, Seventh-Day Adventist Here❤🎉.
I am a Latter Day Saint Christian, thank you for including us in the video ❤
Mormons arent Christian’s
@@rhys09876 We don't prefer to be called Mormons. It would be nice if you would call us Latter-day Saints, instead of an offensive nickname created by the people who hated our church in the early 19th century.
@@acorngnome Is LDS okay?
@@ireneusjustinpolicarp8628 Yes.
As a LDS, I’m excited that people recognize us :)
Im a non-denominational protestant and no matter what denomination we are, we are all brothers in Christ.
Technically, Catholicism also has appeared in 1054. Before - it was simply Christianity, having two main centers, with some differences in theology, but still undivided and common. Moreover, if one of them continues the original tradition, is much more Orthodox Christianity, than Catholicism, being closer to the first Christian believers...
Yes, Catholicism is the true successor to OG Christianity, how did you know?
@@lain7758 Catholicism is quite far from what the first Christians believe. F.e. St. Paul stated in his 1st Epistle to Timothy, that bishops and diacons should be, among other, a husband of one wife, because how could anyone care about the God's Church, if he can not take care of his own home and family. How many Catholic priests do have wifes and families?
@@avtandil Matthew 19:12.
@@lain7758 yes, some are uncapable, but they shouldn't become priests. Anyway, Catholicism has changed so much during millenia, that it has not much common with the Christ's teaching. The Eastern and Orthodox Churches are much closer to it.
@@avtandil the recommendations in 1 Timothy 3:2 are pretty much omissive in nature. God has spoken, it's up to us to interpret His teachings correctly.
🙂 We are all Christians. We all follow Christianity. That's it 🙂
People believe different things about God and have different interpretations of the Bible depending on what church you go to.
It's not that simple
@@rozlinchristian1106 Nope.
If you don't believe Jesus is God, you are not a Christian.
If you don't believe that Jesus died and rose again, you aren't a Christian.
If you don't believe in the Trinity, you aren't a Christian.
Other beliefs that you shouldn't believe (unscriptural):
You shouldn't pray to saints.
You shouldn't pray to Mary.
You shouldn't make statues of people (that's idolization - as is praying to them).
Other things you CAN do:
Read aprocyphal/pseudepigraphical works (nowhere in scripture does it say you cannot - but it DOES reference it).
Even Muslims are followers of Jesus Christ and his teachings.
I love being a Pentecostal 😇😇 God bless you all!
Mee too ❤
i am catholic Algerian change, but i respect all Religions 💙💛.
As a moroccan i didn’t know that algeria had Christians
didn't you guys were muslims
@@Fortunately_Existing that s what i thought too , the majority of moroccans and algerians are muslims and the minority are jewish but Christians are just european ppl who live with us
@@manyacho_k المسحيون في كل مكان عزيزتي 👼🏻، أنا جزائريٌ مغير ديانته 👼🏻😊.
God bless the Catholics in Muslim majority countries!
I am Hindu.. but i respect Cristian ❤️
Really enjoyable and informative short video🙌 however, it is commonly agreed upon that Jehowas Witnesses and the Church of Mormon falls outside the definiton of Christianity, as they have their own separate religious books, and denies the holy trinity.
Wrong! The Mormon's believe in God the Eternal Father, his son Jesus Christ and in the Holy Ghost.
JWs don't have a separate book. Why did you lie?
@@rolyjosephs4797 but they still have their own book called the Book of Mormon. Just like how Christians have the old testament (Torah) and the new testament (the Bible). If Christians didn’t have the New Testament, they would have been called Jews. So that why many people believe you guys to be different religions
I'm a Brazilian Catholic!🇻🇦🇧🇷✝️
Im Catholic.
We are all Christians who believe in Jesus Christ ⛪❤️✝️
also u all enter hell fire 🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂
@@giovannigiorgio2262 what your allah said in alquran? Muhammad and all Muslims going to hell. i give you the verse from your satanic book alquran if you don't know.
how? jesus said that only if you eat his body and drink his blood you will be saved, but those that are not catholic do not do that.
Yes
@@littlecottagegirl4757then did Jesus lie to the thief beside him on the cross? That probably didn’t take comunión
Seventh day Adventist here
Same!💖
You forgot the Byzantine Orthodox Church
I am roman catholic.☝️🇻🇦🇪🇸
I'm a non-denominational Christian. Proud to be one. 😊
I’m atheist/agnostic proud to be one ☝️
This channel expresses christianity and islam perfectly. Respect
Thank you for your information 👌👍🙏
Our eastern orthodox brothers are not gonna like that you refer to them as splitting from the Roman Catholics when it is the Roman Catholics who split from them(in their view)
Well when you originally had 5 main seats of the church and 5 equal patriarchs but one of them decides he is above the others and starts implementing new dogma, I would say it is that one that has split from the others. And the orthodox church has existed well before 1054 AD. Just for reference the Bulgarian orthodox church was founded in 870 AD and received patriarchal status in 919 AD and those of Antioch, Alexandria, Jerusalem and Konstantinopol are way way older and were never under the patriarch of Rome (the pope) authority.
@@s.y.s6030 I believe the Eastern Orthodox church to be the one true catholic church as well, I'm just trying to provide a neutral view unlike the video.
@@X_mano Sorry, missed the sarcasm 😀
technically if you look back to the good ol' days you'll see that when they changed that part of the creed they were like "under whos authority did ya'll do that" and the response was "the pope's" and they didnt like that (historically the church would hold an ecumenical council over changes such as these)
also ya'll changed the name ("orthodox")
plus Catholicism has the bigger population (by 1 billion💀) and is basically universally accepted as the OG church
@@e-1074 Just because something has a bigger following, doesn't make it any truthful. The orthodox church was able to preserve its original dogmas and traditions while being under Muslim rule for over 5 centuries while the catholic church despite having the resources and access to the colonies of the Western powers has changed its views with every new pope. I would like to ask how does the pope's infallibility work when there are popes who blatantly contradict their predecessors and even condemn some to be heretics when under this central to the catholic church dogma every pope should be right. And also it was the pope who made the changes with the Filioque.
*PHILIPPINE INDEPENDENT CHURCH* FOUNDED 1902 AD
As part of the Philippine Revolution, founded on the principles of Philippine nationalism within the clergy.
Catholic here, and I disagree that you listed the Eastern Orthodox Church founding at 1054, while listing Roman Catholic at 33 AD... If you ask me, both churches only existed in 1054, if not the exact reverse of what you listed, since before they split in that year, both the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches were one, single church, called the Imperial Church of Rome, or more simply, just "the Church"...
They originally have 3 major patriarchates and each patriarchate celebrate using different rites, the Latin/Roman Rite used by the Patriarchate of Rome, the Syriac/Antiochene Rite used by the Patriarchate of Antioch, and the Coptic/Alexandrian Rite used by the Patriarchate of Alexandria... The Patriarchate of Constantinople was later added using the Greek/Byzantine Rite, and later, the Patriarchate of Jerusalem using the same rite... However, there were other rites used, such as the Armenian rite used by the Armenian Apostolic Church, and although this church participated in the early councils of the Imperial Church (despite Armenia being an independent kingdom), later on, they stopped participating... However, their authority and legitimacy was still recognized by the patriarchs of the Imperial Church...
Later, the Patriarchate of Alexandria was the first of the 5 patriarchates to experience schism, splitting into the newly-formed Coptic Orthodox Church, and the Church of Alexandria that remained in communion with the other 4 patriarchates of the Imperial Church... Then later, it was the Patriarchate of Antioch, splitting into the newly-formed Syriac Orthodox Church, and the Church of Antioch that remained in communion with the other 4 patriarchates of the Imperial Church...
Then later, the biggest schism of all happened in 1054, called the "Great Schism", where the Patriarchate of Rome and Patriarchate of Constantinople excommunicated each other... The 3 other patriarchates of the Imperial Church, the Church of Alexandria, the Church of Antioch, and the Patriarchate of Jerusalem all supported the Patriarch of Constatinople, essentially isolating the Patriarch of Rome... This was due to the arrogance of the Roman patriarch into thinking that they can just single-handedly change a church doctrine and impose it upon the other patriarchates without calling an ecumenical council... Soo, basically, it was actually the Church of Rome that separated from the Imperial Church, and not the other way around... The 4 churches/patriarchates of the Imperial Church that remained in communion with each other later on became the Holy Orthodox Catholic Church, or more commonly known as the Eastern Orthodox Church, while the Church of Rome would later become the Roman Catholic Church... Soo basically, if there's one of the 2 churches that closer to being the "successor" to the Imperial Church, it would be the Eastern Orthodox, and not the Roman Catholic Church... And again, I'm saying this as a Roman Catholic...
The thing about the Roman Catholic Church is that numerous changes and reforms were implemented... Many of the ancient practices of the early Imperial Church were lost and changed due to the Catholic reforms, which is just unfortunate... One such large reform that changed alot from the church was the Counter-Reformation campaign... Practices that were removed/added to the Church during this time included was the added use of the musical instrument "organ" to the liturgy, something that was never used before... Another is the removal of the use of local languages, and enforcing the use of Latin in every single liturgical service, even when the congregation doesn't even understand Latin... Another is enforcing the use of shape of "Latin cross" on every church building, and disapproving the use of the earlier-used "Greek cross-shaped" church buildings, which was used all throughout the Roman Empire during the ancient times... Another is the removal of the use of "rood screens", which is a screen barrier that separates the nave/congregation from the sanctuary/altar in order to preserve the sanctity of the altar... It was something that was, again, used all throughout the Roman Empire during the ancient times, but its use was disapproved during the counter-reformation campaigns... The counterpart of these "rood screens" in the Eastern Orthodox Church is the "iconostasis", which served a similar purpose... And then, another such large reforms was the introduction of the "Novus Ordo" during the 2nd Vatican Council during the 20th Century... This remove basically removed all sense or "ancientness" from the church... Meanwhile, the Eastern Orthodox Church never had a single large reform since the Schism, preserving all ancient traditions and rituals in the liturgy...
Same could be said about oriental orthodox churches
Haven't heard about Old Believers? Or Old Calendarists?
@@stevenmora0017 The thing with Old Believers is that they refused to drop some rituals whose origins can be traced back to Russian pagan rituals of old, and refused to adapt to the "integration" of the Russian church with the rest of the Eastern Orthodoxy... This disparity in rituals between the Russian church and the rest of Eastern Orthodoxy can be traced back to the formation of the Moscow Patriarchate itself, because the patriarchate in Moscow was established independently, without approval or guidance from the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople... Because of this, the Moscow Patriarchate was misled and therefore, became a Christian church with Russian pagan elements, as opposed to the purely Christian practices of the rest of Eastern Orthodoxy... Along with this syncretization, came the mistranslation of scriptures and misinterpretation of doctrines...
So to fix this, and to further integrate the Russian church with the rest of Eastern Orthodoxy, a council of bishops was called by the Patriarch of Moscow and Tsar of Russia, and along with the Russian bishops, they also invited delegations not just from the Ecumenical Patriarchate, but also from the Patriarchate of Jerusalem and Patriarchate of Alexandria, to guide the Russian church to the right path... However, the changes and resolutions that came out of the councils were rejected by the so-called "Old Believers", or the conservative minority who wants to preserve the old Russian traditions, even if they're not purely Christian... Thus, the Moscow Patriarchate continued to be in communion with the rest of Eastern Orthodoxy, except for those so-called Old Believers who continued some of their pagan-origin practices, and continued to use their mistranslated and misinterpreted doctrines and scriptures, as opposed to the ones revised by the council to match those used by the rest of Eastern Orthodoxy... So technically, the Old Believers are not legitimate, and therefore heretics, in the eyes of the Eastern Orthodox Church...
The Old Calendarist however, along with the so-called "True Orthodox", were born mainly out of socio-political, and not religious or theological issues... The Old Calendarists, as seen from their name, split from mainstream Eastern Orthodoxy because they refused to adapt the Gregorian calendar, or the Revised Julian calendar, which are updated calendars and therefore more accurate, as opposed to the Old Julian calendar used by the so-called Old Calendarists... Meanwhile, the "True Orthodox" was formed mainly by the anti-communist clergy, who opposed all forms of socialism and views the ideology as anti-Christian... Most True Orthodox factions splitted from the Russian Orthodox Church after the Moscow Patriarchate supported the formation of the Soviet Union, however, True Orthodox factions also emerged from other communist countries outside of the ROC sphere... Most True Orthodox are also Old Calendarists by nature, meaning, they also dont accept the Gregorian calendar or the revised version of the Julian calendar... So these Old Calendarists and True Orthodox are considered by mainstream Eastern Orthodoxy as schismatics, and therefore, heretics, just like the Old Believers...
claiming the catholic church is from 30AD and that the orthodox is from 300-1000AD shows the bias or how uninformed this channel is
I am a Seventh Day Adventist❤❤❤❤
Only Eastern Orthodox church is original and truth Christianity which have continuity related to the root of Christianity. All denomination should back to Orthodox church truth dogmatics. Wish you all the best. ☦️
❤🤍💙 all your videos mate👍
I am orthodox Christianity from Russia 🇷🇺☦️, Russia is orthodox Christianity
I choose not to follow a religion in my life, but I watched this video just out of curiosity
Well maybe keep on following that curiosity..
I think a religion might help you in life. I’m a Muslim but choose what you want.
In this world, there is nothing happens by change.
@@xrushing5956 dawg don‘t violate my religion like that you goddamn atheist or smth
@duckynado8781 such behavior is so not halal mode 🚫🚫🚫🚫 😱 😱
Good work explaining
I love being orthodox ☦️
I grew up Baptist/ non-denominational. It’s seems Presbyterians run the church most inline with the way the Bible instructs. The best ones in my San Antonio fall under PCA. I watched the online service on Sunday. I’m taking my family in person next week. Lutheran was my second choice but it felt a bit too Catholic (the choreographed phrases and responses).
The vast amount of denominations is both a strength and a major weakness for Christianity as its totally impossible to keep unity among adherents.
I’m a Lutheran … “The first Protestant denomination. Founded by Martin Luther. Emphasizing faith and scripture over rituals”.
Am Christian I love all domination as long you believe in Jesus the messiah we are family in our savior love to all you ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️✝️✝️✝️✝️
the first church was the orthodox antioch church and not the catholic church. the catholic church came to be after one bishop in rome declared himself superior, while all the power lay in the eastern part of rome around 250 ad or so.
Orthodox Christianity is the most peaceful & accomodating of all sects. Love Orthodoxy 💌💌
I’m a LDS! Praise the Lord :)
One thing, Orthodoxy was not founded in 1054. It was founded on Pentecost.
Im thinking of becoming a Christian but im still quite hesitant and scared and also overwhelmed by the choices of Christianity.
What would you recommend without using your own bias?
I'd just read the Bible and the Holy Spirit will guide you through it. I'm non-denominational. We are insistent on teaching the Bible without a denominational lens.
I am muslim, i love christians❤
Do you love Atheists?
Thank you 💫
@@CobraSaucee ❤❤
✝️🤝☪️
@@reyanaaluI can definitely respect and agree with the sentiment. Also I don't know if this is just pop culture nonsense but is it true that some people of the book (though not actual Muslims) might be given the chance to ascend to heaven?
While I'm asking what exactly is the general Islamic opinion on christ? From what I've read it goes in to radical extremes so if you can help clarify that'd be amazing. 😁 Have a great day!
2:57
JW here, that church has a cross on the flagstone! We don't believe use the cross.
We actually take place in average library-like buildings for our meetings. 🙂
Love y'all. And remember, James 1:17
The older your church is, it's more likely to be a true church since all of the old heretic churches went extinct over time and new heresies started to pop up in modern times.
But that's not the exact date of catholic church btw. Before great schism church in Rome was not the same as it is after the great schism, filioque, non leavened bread, cardinals, papal supremacy, etc.
Some webs says they came from 33 because they have a list of bishops in Rome (that every Orthodox, oriental Orthodox, Anglican, Assyrian, etc. Also have) and mostly because they state that doctrine in that way.
Btw I'm not saying catholic church came from nowhere, but definitely is not more old that other churches, but it's a development of the latin church in Rome through centuries, as Orthodox is a development in Constantinople and Greek world, and Lutheran in Germany, and anglicans in England
@@matiasgamalieltolmosuarez790 The Roman Church and the Greek church were two separate churches with different cultures that were in communion before the Great Schism. The schism doesn't separate one single church into two. What happened was that the churches in communion broke away from the communion. Lutheran and Anglican churches don't have any apostolic succession at all.
@@anycyclopedia are u kidding me?? So there wasn't any christian living in England before schism ?? And what about Germany, Scandinavia?? Of course Germany and Scandinavia were christianized centuries after reformation, but by BISHOPS WITH APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION. Or do u think Christianity never came to north Europe in a valid way???
The archbishop of Canterbury, York, Magdenburg, Bremen, Uppsala, Dubin, and all the bishops (Lubeck, Meissen, etc.) who accepted the reformation were the same valid as the bishops who rejected the reformation. By your logic just the ancient Territory of Roman empire would be "apostolic" but other places Christianized after are Not apostolic???
The timeline of the early churches isn't the most accurate. Actually it's the Catholic perspective, while Orthodox would tell you that the Orthodox Church existed since 30 AD and that the Roman Catholics separated in 1054.
It's byzantine churches, it's not right to call chalcedonian churches as orthodox. Only the Oriental Orthodox who follows the christological formula of cyril can call themselves orthodox
I'm Lutheran
It is not an explanations it's just naming of churches.
eastern orthodox church since 1054 ad 😂
If the Eastern Orthodox Church was birthed/created in 1054 then so was the Roman Cathic Church. (it was a split not a new church.)
Tf are these dates eastern orthodoxy was the first form of christianity, you should put catholicism at 1054 si ce they were the ones to split up
I’m catholic and I’m from Italy 🇮🇹❤️🔥✝️
With this, I am really wondering what kind of Christianity practiced in Greece before 1054 if it was not Orthodoxy back then
You can definitely look to the Early Eastern Church Father's, like St. Chrysostom, St. Basil, and many others for this! While the Early Church appears to go either way on the subject of Papal Supremacy, we can definitely say that there were local bishops under Patriarchs that all met in Councils to define dogma and settle theological, sacramental, and practical disputes. The Bishop of Rome was typically present and given authority during these meetings. The Eastern Church was thus highly structured and emphasized ritual, which more often than not remains today!
Catholicism
They were Orthodox
Yup, this is why I tried to be objective in my response. I have my own interpretation, but I'm not about to get on the internet and wade through this ages - old debate :)
Only opinion, I'm not pretend to the absolute truth!!!
They were Early Christians. Neither ortodox nor catholic. But, as far as they admit the pope (for example, in the Orthodox church there are some canonised popes before 1054, as I know), in 1054 the east Christians had broken away from the church that after that situation was named catholic.
the orthodox and catholic churches were united together until 1054 AD, the schism divided them, a better start date for them both would be ~33 AD, on this day actually June 4th, Holy Pentecost
I find it funny that this video is biased by declaring that the Catholic church is the one that started in 30 AD and the Eastern Orthodox Church split off from it.
because its true
@@IshSheva But Eastern Orthodox People would claim it's the exact other way around.
I am a Christian that loves the display of the Catholic churches with their murals, but accepts the Bible as truth over individuals that become misguided christians, so I have protestant characteristics, but i believe Gods & Jesus kingdom is only 1 Faction that makes a whole to people united under doing Christian missions & preaching the truth - not multiple churches.
You either please Jesus or are not following his ways to the letter 📙
i AM Roman Catholic Church india🇮🇳🇮🇳
Are u from Kerala?
Is it legal to be Catholic 🇻🇦 in India 🇮🇳?
@@gabrielvalerio3992 yeah it is but I am not Roman Catholic I am syro Malabar catholic ✝️
@@nathelzean9745 WHAT?
The official name is "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints". Mormon is an old fashioned slur given to us in the 19th century by people who hated us.
Then why is your book called the Book of Mormon then?
There are a lot of disputable historical info again.
Why Catholic Church exist since 30 AD, but Orthodox only since 1054? And the same bout Church of the East...
Sadly, there's no info on Old-Believers and Uniatiс Churches.
Orthodox was not created in 1054, it was created at the Holy Pentecost
Roman Catholic ✋
Before 1054 Orthodox and Catholicism was as one. But Rome broke out in 1054 from the east and created a lot of problems that created Protestantism. Instead Eastern Church - Orthodox has remained in the ancient traditions of Christianity and is a correct church that, more than others, is closer to the Apostolic Faith
How can u say roman catholic church as 30 ad but then go on to say oriental and eastern orthodox and church of the east came later. All 4 were part of the original church they all originated from the beginning itself
The good thing about the church in Cleveland was that there was no sus or zombified activities there and no Siren Head is intruding because the power of Jesus, AMEN
what?
@@stars-hk9uo Cleveland, Ohio
It may have bothered me too much that you've said that Roman Catholic church started at 30AD, while Easter Orthodox was founded at 1054. While I do think this is exactly backwards from reality, you could have used a more neutral language to say that both were united until the split in 1054. I had to dislike it for this. New people might conclude that Catholic church was the only one from the time of Christ. The way you handled other orthodox churches wasn't great either.
Right, Christian congregations that started in the first century AD could hardly be considered to be what is today Catholics.
In fact, Catholicism, as well as Orthodoxy, reformed Christianity so much that Protestants emerged in the Middle Ages pointing out that the Christianity (of the Church) had strayed away from the teachings of the scriptures, adoping non-Biblical and even pagan mythology.
Wrong information: oriental orthodox and eastern orthodox were older than Roman catholic church, you can read Acts to make sure
correct
Christianity has many denominations but which one is the real religion introduced by Jesus? I mean which one is the real Christianity?
Catholicism.
@@lain7758
no
You know, Jesus didn’t came on Earth to start a religion ! He came so we can be saved and have a relationship with Him.
@@Azyo62 yes.
You'd have to ask Jesus himself, which denomination he feels as the most fitting to his teaching.
All the Orthodox Churches started in 33 AD as well.
Not all.
Some started around 100AD, others around 400 AD. But, yeah, not +1000AD as mentioned in the video.
If you put the Roman Chatolic Church on 30 Ad, you should also put The Orthodox, because not way that Church has been just since 1054. You lack a lor o Knownladge here...
Catholic here, agreed with you.
@Nerdrobot really ? U really bout to swap the starting dates of orthodox and catholic
U should update this video cause thats just bad information
Thank For The Video ✝️💟😍👌😁💞
Its absolutely wrong to divide Christianity into different parts. We all just need to follow Jesus Christ and unite for those Christian who suffering different hardship .We are just a christian or not anything and follow only one Jesus .So ,way we are divided in to so many different parts.
I am seventh day adventist ☺️☺️☺️
Same!💖
Do you really think that Jesus has waited until 1863 to tell us that all the other religions were wrong and that his Apostoles had mistaken to teach their faith?
@@gabrielvalerio3992
Actually that’s not what the SDA teaches
Hi from a person who supports all religions! :D
Just saying here, Don't want to be cancelled but the Mormon church in my place is kinda like a different religion.
As is jehovah
The accurate name is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. There is no "Mormon church".
I agreed. Same with JW’s. Both deny the Trinity.
Lmao get cancelled ousted 😂
Make a video about Hinduism and Buddhism and Sikh like how you did it on Islam, Judaism and Christianity
What about the greek catholic church ?
Its the Catholic Church
He said Church of the East which is think he is referring to the Eastern Catholic Church, and the Greek Catholic Church is part of the Eastern Catholic Church.
I believe in only one denomination
Christian
There is only 1 🇻🇦❤
Roman Catholic Church didnt start on 30AD This is very big lie.
Catholicism was formed in 1054, when it broke from the true Orthodox Church
wasnt it the opposite
@@micahabelm3725 no. Pope became boss in 1054, before that he shared with Patriarchy
...நீங்கள் எந்த ஆலயத்திற்கு போனாலும் , உங்கள் ஆத்துமா இரட்சிக்கப்படவேண்டும்..
ஆமென் 😇🙏🏼
Good
Which denomination will be saved by Jesus?