I heard lectures of shri Oak, who is scholar in Indic literature, he quotes in his lecture and also proved with modern science that, rigved is around 21000 to 22000 years old. Then Ramayan is around 14000 years old, Mahabharat is 6000 to 7000 years old. You can watch his video on you tube.
Mrugendra Ji, Can I make a suggestion which you surely have already thought about. Can these 25 VEDMURTIS - in taittiriya and also others be increased through through sponsarship programs. Saving the Traditions. Choosing the right candidates, taking care of their remuneration and livelyhood from studentship for full life. Iam sure you must have looked at such options.
This is by far the best introduction to Vedas. and I must add that I have seen many explanations but this is better than all. Thanks CIS for bringing this. And Shri Mrugendra Vinod ji with all humility I bow down to your feet.🙏🙏
Namaste Guruji. Thank you much for the wonderful narration. Only one flaw i saw was that while defining Aporusheyatvam, you quoted Sri. Shankaracharya's definition of '...kartu asmaraNaM apouruSEyatavaM'. That is not correct. Even folklore literature have unbroken traditions and their authors are forgotten (asmaranam). Thus, this definition will cause ativyapti dosha. Correct definition one can find is in Sri. Madhvacharya's work. He defines as akartu prasiddhaM apouruSEyatvaM. Meaning, Veda have reputation of to be no author. Compare this with your definition of forgotten author.
Why vEda-s are called 'Veda' ? Sri MadhvaAchraya-ji quotes pipplAda sruti -- nEndriyANi nAnumAnaM vEdA haivainam vEdayanti tasmAdAhuH 'vEdAH' -- iti pipplAda sruti Sri. Jaya Tirtha (tIkAchrya of Madhva school) comments on this quote of Acharya and says -- enaM paramAtmAnam.h | tasmAt.h vedanakaraNatve samAne.api asAdhAraNyena vyapadeshA bhavantIti nyAyAt.h vishishhTavastuvedanakaraNatvAdeva hi etAn.h vedA ityAhuH | term `enaM' (meaning 'this') refers to the Paramaatman. Therefore, although the property of informing (about something or the other) is common to the Vedas and other texts, it is because this Vedic text gives information about "Special Tatva",hence it is called `Veda'.
![Coheed and Cambria - Searching for Tomorrow [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hDsYGLbmadg/mqdefault.jpg)
गुरु जी प्रणाम।
वैदिक बालकों को प्रेम।
Pranam
बहोत ही प्रशंसनीय उपक्रम! मृगेंद्रजी आप ऐसेही सरलतासे वेदोंके विषयमे प्रबोधन करे और हमे थोड़ा ज्ञानी बनाए ये विनंती। 🙏🏻
Always loved to hear more and more from Shri Vinod ji, as usual.
Ahh... happy to see Mr. Mrugrendra Vinod, a distinguished scholar, back on screen after almost 2 yrs ..... Thanks CFIS for this upload!
Very informative discussion 👍🙏🏻
Little Eklavya behind mrugendra ji nods well, he's going know more than most viewers about Vedas
Absolutely 🙏🚩🚩🚩🙏
I heard lectures of shri Oak, who is scholar in Indic literature, he quotes in his lecture and also proved with modern science that, rigved is around 21000 to 22000 years old. Then Ramayan is around 14000 years old, Mahabharat is 6000 to 7000 years old. You can watch his video on you tube.
वेद ईश्वर की वाणी है और वेदों के अध्ययन से आनंदायी कुछ भी नहीं हैं।
Bahut hi sundar wyakhaan.
Thanks 🙏
Blessed to find such an enlightening session on youtube!
उत्तम प्रयास,
Very good 👍..
How to contact shri Vinod ji .i want to gain something from him.
Please ask him how can we study veda
Mrugendra Ji,
Can I make a suggestion which you surely have already thought about.
Can these 25 VEDMURTIS - in taittiriya and also others be increased through through sponsarship programs.
Saving the Traditions.
Choosing the right candidates, taking care of their remuneration and livelyhood from studentship for full life. Iam sure you must have looked at such options.
जरथुस्त्र का काल भी अनुमानित है
Namstey...
This can be presented objectively, literature available
🙏🚩🚩🚩🙏
This is by far the best introduction to Vedas. and I must add that I have seen many explanations but this is better than all. Thanks CIS for bringing this.
And Shri Mrugendra Vinod ji with all humility I bow down to your feet.🙏🙏
Namaste Guruji. Thank you much for the wonderful narration. Only one flaw i saw was that while defining Aporusheyatvam, you quoted Sri. Shankaracharya's definition of '...kartu asmaraNaM apouruSEyatavaM'. That is not correct. Even folklore literature have unbroken traditions and their authors are forgotten (asmaranam). Thus, this definition will cause ativyapti dosha. Correct definition one can find is in Sri. Madhvacharya's work. He defines as akartu prasiddhaM apouruSEyatvaM. Meaning, Veda have reputation of to be no author. Compare this with your definition of forgotten author.
❤️
👌
Why vEda-s are called 'Veda' ?
Sri MadhvaAchraya-ji quotes pipplAda sruti --
nEndriyANi nAnumAnaM vEdA haivainam vEdayanti tasmAdAhuH 'vEdAH' -- iti pipplAda sruti
Sri. Jaya Tirtha (tIkAchrya of Madhva school) comments on this quote of Acharya and says --
enaM paramAtmAnam.h | tasmAt.h vedanakaraNatve
samAne.api asAdhAraNyena vyapadeshA bhavantIti nyAyAt.h
vishishhTavastuvedanakaraNatvAdeva hi etAn.h vedA ityAhuH |
term `enaM' (meaning 'this') refers to the Paramaatman. Therefore, although the property of informing (about something or the other) is common to the Vedas and other texts, it is because this Vedic text gives information about "Special Tatva",hence it is called `Veda'.