It should be pointed out that the Matabele had only conquered Mashonaland some sixty years before ther British arrived. The Matabele were themselves Imperialists.
@@ncubesays The Matabele were a Zulu offshoot who arrived in what is now Zimbabwe as late as 1840 by conquest over the local Shonas. If I remember correctly, the Matabele called neighbouring Shonas "Maswina", which I think may mean "carrion people".
So just out of interest who looked more like hitler and how well has the country done since? Why does no one have any grief towards the Romans or any other empire? (Greek, Ottoman…!)
How about this for context Cecil Rhodes is the one who started the whole modern New World Order agenda. He donated his wealth for that specific purpose.
Many people miss the whole point of colonization: If Europeans hadn't colonized Africa, somebody else would have. There will always be another colonizer looking over your shoulder. Indeed before Europeans arrived in South Africa, black people colonized South Africa - as the original inhabitants of SA were the San. Although this is not documented in the historical record it is evident from the archaeological and linguistic records. Black people were the biggest colonizers in Africa. To this day many of them insist on using the word "Africans" for themselves - as if the whole continent belongs to them despite Africa being inhabited by Egyptians, San, etc.
Hitler was quite the ambitious man himself. Shall we exalt his merits too? It's always lovely when someone thinks ambition is quality we should aspire too.
@@chadbentoski5778 The only reason why hitler`s ambition is looked down upon is because it did not work out. Ambition is only good if your achieve your goals.
Went to a secret society to expand and preserve the British Empire then the power shifted to the Rockefellers to implement the New World Order from the UN as we know it today 😉
Read "Tradedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time" I am afraid Oswald Spengler was right. Cecil Rhodes marked the start of the empire phase of The West and there is no going back from that just collapse.
That argument that the Europeans had a right to mine Africa's resources because they had the equipment needed to get the minerals is absolutely bonkers, it's like me saying because I have a shovel and my neighbor doesn't I therefore have a right to dig for gold in their yard because I have the equipment they do not as of yet possess.
@@BizarroLanigirod their mining technology or knowledge about geology (basically nothing) didn't let them have mass gold extraction ( so most of the gold will go unnoticed), in most places where there was gold, they didn't even mind about it, but if they did in the other hand, they will be extracting only a little if not nothing, but about diamonds, sure they were not extracting it. And i was also talking about other precious materials.
Its absoltely right though. Its also not justifying the act of imperialism. Its saying that those rsources are not african because africans were not the ones who obtained them. Which is true.
It would be more like claiming the oil underneath your freinds house is his simply because he lives under there. Even though that oil would be worthless and impossible to access without specialized equipment.
Nigel John Biggar CBE is a British Anglican priest, theologian, and ethicist. From 2007 to 2022, he was the Regius Professor of Moral and Pastoral Theology at the University of Oxford. Who’d have thought…
@Kraken Thunder no, there are many european nations that didn't colonize and are super rich. And colonisation sometimes (like the case of France) costed them more than they won from it.
@@SirDrakeFrancis A dozen African countries are forced to pay $500 billion dollars every single year to France. France wouldn't survive without it's thievery.... And we can also talk about what they have done and continue to do to Haiti
People don’t know anything about Cecil Rhodes.. they need to understand Carroll Quigley.. Georgetown Professor that had a a famous student called Bill Clinton that was a Rhodes Scholar. That statue will never fall as it has such a large significance to a small group of people at the very top of the Hierarchy.
He was based, I’m proud of the British Empire it created my country of New Zealand the common denominator between the successful and unsuccessful ones where how many uncivilised people where in the colonised area, Hong Kong, Canada, the USA, Singapore Australia and New Zealand are all prosperous nations directly because of the British empire, sadly places like Rhodesia where in the right place at the wrong time, if it was 200 years ago Rhodesia would be the Australia of Africa but sadly we had hard minded idealist international organisations who applied the idea of equal rights to every situation regardless of the advancement of the society, theirs a reason the USA was successful, because they slowly and pragmatically gave voting rights as more and more became educated and civilised
I’m south african and live in the areas “Rhodes” brought terror on. WTF . What this guy did …. has the British given back the heads of South African Kings who opposed them?!😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
Good video.. nice to see someone who knows what they talking abt doing the talking for once instead of a bunch of ppl with no concept of history or Rhodes in particular..
No, they wouldn't have even touched them for a century until europeans or asians sold them equipment to mine it. As shown by this exact thing happening in Botswana.
"He disregarded the rights of the people-the 'natives,' as he referred to them-already living on the lands that he claimed." (Britannica) "Backed by the British army, Rhodes's colonising forces dispossessed millions of Africans of their land and created an apartheid state that endured for 90 years." (The Guardian)
Cecil they have made into ceaser (oly) so he eye bursts out from the tube from rocky handsome 😂 so then they can say rhodes was behind it Regards The world of jinns 😂
that was a horrible interview, it seem like the interviewer didn't have no knowledge about Cicil to counter the lies this man was speaking in Cicil defience
Well let what rhodes did to sa and the people happen to this lad and his family then see what he thinks seems like a lot of karma is happening in the west now.people just trying to justify wrong doings. He killed thousands of people and Hitler loved him.
Africa needs justice and so do all the countries that were colonized. Unil Europeans experience what their forefathers did things can never be made right.
15;15 NO?? I am now coming to the conclusion that this professor is utterly useless with his defense of Rhodes. Rhodes was no saviour. Just my opinion.
When I saw “history defended” i knew in order for this information to retain its self within my brain first I must clear out previously learned propaganda for an even more foolish and deliberately delusional take.
This man is co.pletwly ofd. In Kimberly a big part of the consessions were run bij natives. To pretend they did nothing bit surface mining is simply false. To use this falsehood as an excuse for robbin' peoples land is absolutely immoral. As it was in the 19th century
It should be pointed out that the Matabele had only conquered Mashonaland some sixty years before ther British arrived. The Matabele were themselves Imperialists.
But they did not cleanse entire arrears of their inhabitants.
Kindly explain how Matebeleland was an empire? What yoke did the Ndebele place the Shona under?
@@ncubesays The Matabele were a Zulu offshoot who arrived in what is now Zimbabwe as late as 1840 by conquest over the local Shonas. If I remember correctly, the Matabele called neighbouring Shonas "Maswina", which I think may mean "carrion people".
true
Right, and not above engaging in slaughter and exploitation by the sound of it
The audacity to say taxation "encouraged" Africans to work for him
They promised lower rates if they worked
2:40 Benjamin jarret?
@@gopivh
So just out of interest who looked more like hitler and how well has the country done since? Why does no one have any grief towards the Romans or any other empire? (Greek, Ottoman…!)
Stop the nonsense. America has been topling and meddling with African governments since the beginning of time. Africa is wealthy in resources
they do. Lots of people give grief to multiple empires
@@blackthanos5957
2:40 Benjamin Garrett?
Context is everything. For details, read Thomas Pakenham's monumental work, "The Scramble for Africa."
Quite right Steve. A marvellous piece of work
Read Carrol Quigley’s
Tragedy & Hope
How about this for context Cecil Rhodes is the one who started the whole modern New World Order agenda. He donated his wealth for that specific purpose.
I've read it from cover to cover. It's tripe.
@@Lettersfromhome18
2:40 Benjamin who ?
Leopold II of Belgium was the Hitler of Africa. Not Rhodes. Rhodes was, say, the Ferdinand Marcos of Africa.
True! Wish more people knew about him and what they did in the Congo.
Who the blip was Ferdinand Marcos?
@@jmac356Philippines. "Dictator"
Many people miss the whole point of colonization: If Europeans hadn't colonized Africa, somebody else would have. There will always be another colonizer looking over your shoulder. Indeed before Europeans arrived in South Africa, black people colonized South Africa - as the original inhabitants of SA were the San. Although this is not documented in the historical record it is evident from the archaeological and linguistic records. Black people were the biggest colonizers in Africa. To this day many of them insist on using the word "Africans" for themselves - as if the whole continent belongs to them despite Africa being inhabited by Egyptians, San, etc.
How original
@@omalone1169
Does an opinion have to be novel to be valid?
He is an apologist for Rhodes atrocities plain and simple
Rhodes is no hitler just stop a reasonable comparison would be leopold II of Belgium
Bill Clinton Rhodes scholar so yeah
Read Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley.. watch the Bill Clinton inauguration to the democratic convention in 1992
@@malopephasha5341the fact that u even think theres a difference is hilarious lmao
They’re all evil ppl burning in whatever hell u believe in lmao
@@jamesmcintyre1675what will I get from watching it
Wait so a 19 year old came to Africa and took it like a storm. Hate him or not but to have such an ambition is remarkable.
Wangu watsamwei
Was funded by the rothschilds unknowingly working the ambitions set out years prior by Herzl
Hitler was quite the ambitious man himself. Shall we exalt his merits too? It's always lovely when someone thinks ambition is quality we should aspire too.
@@chadbentoski5778 The only reason why hitler`s ambition is looked down upon is because it did not work out. Ambition is only good if your achieve your goals.
@@tatendacharleszindoga7542 That's a load of crap. Ambition is almost always worse when one achieves their goals.
A book called "The Creature from Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin has a different opinion about Mr. Rhodes.
Where did the 7 wills of Cecil Rhodes end up?? As none of his fortune went to his aires. 😉
@James McIntyre Not sure James but Probate Law seems to be a mess.
Went to a secret society to expand and preserve the British Empire then the power shifted to the Rockefellers to implement the New World Order from the UN as we know it today 😉
Read "Tradedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time" I am afraid Oswald Spengler was right. Cecil Rhodes marked the start of the empire phase of The West and there is no going back from that just collapse.
@@reinhardtburger7108
What did Spengler say ?
That argument that the Europeans had a right to mine Africa's resources because they had the equipment needed to get the minerals is absolutely bonkers, it's like me saying because I have a shovel and my neighbor doesn't I therefore have a right to dig for gold in their yard because I have the equipment they do not as of yet possess.
Were the ottomans entitled to Balkan women? Were Mongols entitled to kill most of Asia and a good portion of Europe? No. Then shutup
@@SirDrakeFrancis so black Africans didn't have gold before the civilized white man came in to mine it?
@@BizarroLanigirod their mining technology or knowledge about geology (basically nothing) didn't let them have mass gold extraction ( so most of the gold will go unnoticed), in most places where there was gold, they didn't even mind about it, but if they did in the other hand, they will be extracting only a little if not nothing, but about diamonds, sure they were not extracting it. And i was also talking about other precious materials.
Its absoltely right though. Its also not justifying the act of imperialism. Its saying that those rsources are not african because africans were not the ones who obtained them. Which is true.
It would be more like claiming the oil underneath your freinds house is his simply because he lives under there. Even though that oil would be worthless and impossible to access without specialized equipment.
Nigel John Biggar CBE is a British Anglican priest, theologian, and ethicist. From 2007 to 2022, he was the Regius Professor of Moral and Pastoral Theology at the University of Oxford.
Who’d have thought…
Imagine if no Europeans colonised Africa, what would it be like today ?
It would like exactly like it looked a few hundred years ago. There are places in Africa that have never been colonized. What do they look like?
Like the great civilizations it had when Europeans were living in caves and the dark ages
@Kraken Thunder no, there are many european nations that didn't colonize and are super rich. And colonisation sometimes (like the case of France) costed them more than they won from it.
@@SirDrakeFrancis A dozen African countries are forced to pay $500 billion dollars every single year to France. France wouldn't survive without it's thievery....
And we can also talk about what they have done and continue to do to Haiti
@krakenthunder7046 Finland,Switzerland,Norway,Sweden and Monaco.
Rhodes the Illuminati Head master
Rothschild gofer to plunder all the diamond and gold mines.
ELVIS is alive and well and working at the Rotana Hotel in Khartoum.
👍🏻💯👍🏻
His statues should remain. For good and bad, he is part of our history.
This interview is just incredible. I'm not sure how Nigel can say these things honestly.
Are people better off in Zimbabwe than they were in Rhodesia?
Asking for a friend...
having travelled there recently I can confirm that everyone is so rich - even homeless people have trillions of $
Yes
Depends on their colour
@@Swagnermite
😂
From Cape Town to Cairo will always be revolutionary.
There’s nothing revolutionary about masses of sheep.
A book?
What an apologist for Rhodes!
My thought exactly
Care to elaborate?
cry about it
Boo hoo!
People don’t know anything about Cecil Rhodes.. they need to understand Carroll Quigley.. Georgetown Professor that had a a famous student called Bill Clinton that was a Rhodes Scholar. That statue will never fall as it has such a large significance to a small group of people at the very top of the Hierarchy.
He was based, I’m proud of the British Empire it created my country of New Zealand the common denominator between the successful and unsuccessful ones where how many uncivilised people where in the colonised area, Hong Kong, Canada, the USA, Singapore Australia and New Zealand are all prosperous nations directly because of the British empire, sadly places like Rhodesia where in the right place at the wrong time, if it was 200 years ago Rhodesia would be the Australia of Africa but sadly we had hard minded idealist international organisations who applied the idea of equal rights to every situation regardless of the advancement of the society, theirs a reason the USA was successful, because they slowly and pragmatically gave voting rights as more and more became educated and civilised
He went to Africa to core his sickness
It's in many of his people ( "it" being The sickness of colonisation and White supremacy/White imperialism).
Can homosexuality be cured ?
Can depravity be cured?
never heard someone defend british colonialism so poorly
Cecil is under a Hugh great big rock in Africa, I doubt he even cares what happens to his statue .
Can someone tell me why they think the people in this video are delusional and crazy?
Google who he actually is and then see this interview again
These colonists can lie chaai wow
It was an accident
He went to Africa to core his tuberculosis at age sixteen
Stop cheapening the memory of Apartheid and colonization in South Africa...
Who said weren't capable of evolving from shallow mining
HAHAHAHA hillarious buddy. or should i say victim eternal?
Great watching an intellectual not allowing a young sophist attempting to drop all relevant context and to play gotcha.
Right! King Leopold was.
Leopold u cannot compare to Rhodes. Leopold was a complete and total CLunt.
I’m south african and live in the areas “Rhodes” brought terror on. WTF . What this guy did …. has the British given back the heads of South African Kings who opposed them?!😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
How is the corruption in South Africa?
A citable reference would help, as I can find nothing about this online.
What heads?
given "back" to whom exactly?
Translate and explain 'Usuthu'.
what a great and based man
what a totally one sided and bias interview
This is the best BS I seen today.
I'm glad that we can know and come to the realization it's all about power and no races
So this interviewer seems to think imperial Britain brought no benefits to Africa? Thank god for an intellectual intellectual pointing out the facts.
Good video.. nice to see someone who knows what they talking abt doing the talking for once instead of a bunch of ppl with no concept of history or Rhodes in particular..
Wtf, most white washed shii ever, they wouldve found a way to retrieve those diamonds just like the British came to a conclusion
No, they wouldn't have even touched them for a century until europeans or asians sold them equipment to mine it. As shown by this exact thing happening in Botswana.
This is the funniest thing I've seen this year. I pray to reach this level of delusion someday.
Bongo v Coup today's news from Africa.
Facts
A lot of woke crybabies in the comments
"He disregarded the rights of the people-the 'natives,' as he referred to them-already living on the lands that he claimed." (Britannica)
"Backed by the British army, Rhodes's colonising forces dispossessed millions of Africans of their land and created an apartheid state that endured for 90 years." (The Guardian)
@@6iaZkMagW7EFsplease link to these articles
The historian is basically arguing for Rhodes, biased take
No it's a really balanced discussion objectively examining critical issues
Now for our next talk: Third Reich, slavers or saviours?
Extraordinary Man, misrepresented in the modern age.
Nice try 😂
Cecil they have made into ceaser (oly) so he eye bursts out from the tube from rocky handsome 😂 so then they can say rhodes was behind it
Regards
The world of jinns 😂
Stop with the clickbait style headlines. Rhodes was a terrible man. Period.
Your opinion isn't fact.
Period.
Haha Everything has came full in full circle now from a British Empire to a New World Order as we know it today ran through the United Nations… FACT
Yes, and why Bill Clinton was a Rhodes scholar.
Some of the figureheads in the Biden administration are Rhodes Scholars to
Rhodes did a lot more to develop the country and ultimately a lot more good for the lot of its inhabitants than Mugabe did. Period.
Rhodes was a bad dude. But iconoclasm must be opposed by all means.
Rhodes’ mentality is clapped
that was a horrible interview, it seem like the interviewer didn't have no knowledge about Cicil to counter the lies this man was speaking in Cicil defience
Mind pointing out the "lies" the good professor told?
Forgive me if I trust him over a random
Perhaps they are both Rhodes reputation protection racket
Spell check required.
Well let what rhodes did to sa and the people happen to this lad and his family then see what he thinks seems like a lot of karma is happening in the west now.people just trying to justify wrong doings. He killed thousands of people and Hitler loved him.
Africa needs justice and so do all the countries that were colonized. Unil Europeans experience what their forefathers did things can never be made right.
Groups of europeans have been enslaved many times, read some bloody history.
sophistry (n.) a deliberately invalid argument displaying ingenuity in reasoning in the hope of deceiving someone.
What's ur counterargument then
Claptrap from apologists for imperialism!
Comedic,
Embarrassing
This guy is talking nonsense
rhodes apologist
What nonsense content is this from the interviewee?
Disgusting. What else can one expect
15;15 NO?? I am now coming to the conclusion that this professor is utterly useless with his defense of Rhodes. Rhodes was no saviour. Just my opinion.
Plastic dome
He isn’t british
Born in Scotland
When I saw “history defended” i knew in order for this information to retain its self within my brain first I must clear out previously learned propaganda for an even more foolish and deliberately delusional take.
No, he was worse.
Unbelievable... He is defending someone who committed genocide
Where's your proof for this?
Who did Cecil Rhodes kill exactly and how many.
Evidence?
This man is co.pletwly ofd.
In Kimberly a big part of the consessions were run bij natives. To pretend they did nothing bit surface mining is simply false.
To use this falsehood as an excuse for robbin' peoples land is absolutely immoral.
As it was in the 19th century
Lol this mans delusion is insane