Airbus Emergencies: ENG FIRE/DAMAGE on TAKEOFF | A320NEO | Real Airline Pilot

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 дек 2024

Комментарии • 35

  • @julianheald8661
    @julianheald8661 Год назад +1

    Absolutely love the introduction. "And we're about to have a bad day." Brilliant

  • @leonbelford3863
    @leonbelford3863 Год назад +3

    Informative and entertaining as always. Well done and thank you Sir.

  • @peterlazuric5641
    @peterlazuric5641 Год назад

    What a great video. I loved seeing how you handled the host of other problems caused by the engine fire. The landing gear failure on final and using the gravity gear extension handle was epic. Let me see if I have this right, please correct me if I am wrong. After you extend the gear handle you crank it three times. The first crank isolates the hydraulic system from the gear. The second crank unlocks the landing gear door. The third crank unlocks the landing gear. Then gravity lowers the landing gear very slowly.

  • @AVIATIONSOUNDEXPERT
    @AVIATIONSOUNDEXPERT Год назад +2

    Hello Emanuel,
    1)
    Did you press the rudder trim reset button below 50ft AGL?
    2)
    Why did you use 1600ft for EOAltitide (100ft+1500ftAGL), while you had used 100ft+1000ft AGL for THRRED and ACCALT ?
    Why did you take 1500ft AGL above aerodrome level for EOACCLALT?
    3)
    Is it permissible to set MCT when you reach the EOACCALT?
    Or do you need to retract the flaps and slats first?
    Thanks for answering.

  • @GustavoRodrigues
    @GustavoRodrigues Год назад

    TOLISS and on general, all the current performance calculators on my experience, are only considering runway limitations for the numbers. On toliss I use the landing perf with flaps 3 on departure to see the GA Climb gradient at 60C outside and if I comply with the take-off gradient. and I'm stuck in flaps 2. but climb performance is way more reliable.

  • @yassine8695
    @yassine8695 Год назад

    9:40 Sorry couldnt help but notice that both packs were off for takeoff, but you turned on pack 1 despite eng 1 catching fire. Im assuming you meant to simulate them both being on and you turn off pack1 since eng 1 failed, or was this on purpose?

  • @umi3017
    @umi3017 Год назад +1

    Losing 80% thrust in a single engine failure is kinda a myth, but you do lose about 80% of the climb rate.
    Think it this way: if you have both engine failed, you don't level-off, you glide down, so if you can normally climb at 2500fpm, and glide at -1500fpm, you'll got only 500fpm with 50% of the thrust, it's about right on a 737 or 320 type airliner, so you just lost a bit more than 50% of total thrust.

    • @TeamOdiffat
      @TeamOdiffat 4 месяца назад

      I mean, thrust -drag=only 20% of what it would be with two engines operating.
      You still have 50% thrust but the thrust/drag ratio changed since the second engine not running increased drag. Not only the fan but also the rudder/aileron inputs required and potential sideslip. So saying that you lose 80% thrust might theoretically not be correct but it’s practically helpful in simplifying and making it easy to remember.

  • @frankbyte
    @frankbyte Год назад +1

    Shouldn't flaps 2 only be allowed if not possible otherwise, for having less drag in case of engine-failure and then climb a bit better with flaps 1+F? In particular when high terrain is around?

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 Год назад +1

      Depends on multiple factors. Many airlines prefer not to use Flaps 1 in the A321 due to increased tailstrike risk

    • @frankbyte
      @frankbyte Год назад

      @@tomstravels520 I see, thanks.

  • @tomstravels520
    @tomstravels520 Год назад

    Can you please demonstrate an engine relight mid flight. So select the fault where engine can be restarted and what scenario this may occur using the different methods to relight

  • @eaglethedigger
    @eaglethedigger Год назад +2

    Interesting. So when you are a passenger on such a flight it seems "normal" that you dont get any information from the flightdeck as the procedures (accel,climb,ecam) take so long? Good to know... lots of work for you guys in front

  • @FlyingCube6
    @FlyingCube6 10 месяцев назад

    sadly i use the flybywire, which doesnt have very good failures. Great video, thank you

    • @A330Driver
      @A330Driver  10 месяцев назад

      It's well worth considering the Fenix Airbus if you're on MSFS. It's an excellent addon!

  • @goncalogoncalves7888
    @goncalogoncalves7888 Год назад

    Turning Pack 1 ON in this scenario is a big no-no. Everyone on board would develop serious breathing issues after the 10:00 mark. I'm assuming that wasn't intentional if you are indeed a real A320 pilot...

  • @tomstravels520
    @tomstravels520 Год назад

    Are you passing on any issues you find back to ToLiss such as the gravity extension not appearing?

  • @ericmartrenchard214
    @ericmartrenchard214 Год назад

    hello how to create a pilot point at takeoff and use it for an immediate return after a breakdown thank +++for your tuto ;) Eric

  • @ThunderboltDragon
    @ThunderboltDragon Год назад

    Would emergency vehicles be waiting upon landning?

  • @Brendanmccreight
    @Brendanmccreight Год назад

    Will you still be doing 737 content?

    • @A330Driver
      @A330Driver  Год назад +2

      Hi, over the past ten days I released 4 737 videos so the answer is pretty much yes ;-)

  • @bonk2361
    @bonk2361 Год назад

    does it make sense to simulate failures in anything else than toliss?

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 Год назад

      Depends what failures. Main one ToLiss does not yet support is flap/slat failures

  • @henrychan720
    @henrychan720 Год назад

    Is it just me or does the fenix autopilot stuggle to follow the srs during an engine out climb and always stalls itself?

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 Год назад

      Not tried that yet but I had issues with it on go arounds where it pitched up excessively and then I couldn’t push nose down or even trim nose down. It was only alpha floor and high AOA protection that stopped it stalling

    • @lucaspedrosa2344
      @lucaspedrosa2344 Год назад

      @@tomstravels520 Same thing happened to me in a go around with the Fenix.

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 Год назад

      @@lucaspedrosa2344 yeah sorry I was talking about the Fenix. Never had that problem with ToLiss

  • @n1msu
    @n1msu Год назад

    Does anybody know who made this addon? And what simulator it's running on?

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 Год назад +1

      ToLiss A320Neo running on XPlane 12 using auto-ortho

    • @n1msu
      @n1msu Год назад

      Thanks Tom! I should know really as I have the A321 version, I was just impressed at how the EGT temp sensor increased when the fire began, that doesn't even happen on the fslabs or airlinetools a3xx! @@tomstravels520

  • @enzino237
    @enzino237 Год назад +1

    You completely disregarded the loss of the Green Hydraulic system which affects landing distance, braking capability and go around performance (L/G RETRACT among INOP SYS list in the STATUS page). So to the question " is there anything else that we forgot?" the answer is yes.
    And that's why the landing gear wouldn't come down.

    • @A330Driver
      @A330Driver  Год назад

      The 320 is such a limited plane, lol
      In the A330 that I fly the green system is supplied by both engines so all that stuff is still available.
      We need a good A330 for our Sims!

    • @enzino237
      @enzino237 Год назад

      @@A330Driver I agree with you on that, but make sure to not go too fast reading that STATUS page. It might bite you on the A330 as well in a sim... Don't ask me how I know, eh.

    • @vatsalnarechania6652
      @vatsalnarechania6652 Год назад

      In such a condition where L/G Gear not downlocked ECAM popped out while passing about 2000', would you still continue the approach in real life or conduct a missed approach thereafter troubleshoot and then land back?
      P.S: This situation may or may not include other emergencies.