Climate Change: The Impacts and the Need to Act

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 фев 2019
  • Under Chair @RepRaulGrijalva’s leadership, the Natural Resources Committee is hosting the first House hearing on #climatechange in more than eight years. Watch live this Wednesday, February 6, at 10 a.m. Eastern time.
    Record-setting hurricanes, floods, wildfires and droughts don’t just happen - they’re intensifying because of #ClimateChange. Join us as we take the first step to #ActOnClimate and break eighty years of Republican silence and denial. The American people deserve answers and demand action.

Комментарии • 309

  • @codyfezatte5130
    @codyfezatte5130 Год назад +40

    If the alarmist knew what they were talking about there would not be any . The low intellegentance level of many of these elected officials is astounding ,how can we stop them from ruinning our future .

    • @terrific804
      @terrific804 Год назад +1

      Take away THEIR guns!

    • @codyfezatte5130
      @codyfezatte5130 Год назад +1

      @@terrific804 They would not have any . They would just set there waiting for the China bus to come to load them up like a bunch of cattle and take them to the work camp to be happy in their new socialist life where everything is fair, free and equal as they were taught in college . ( the indoctrination center ) . Then of cource ,they would rat everone out that dose not believe in their B . S . So they can feel proud of them selves .

    • @terrific804
      @terrific804 Год назад +2

      @@codyfezatte5130 I was thinking take away the politician's access to law enforcement's guns... I know that's pretty much impossible... that's why the Constitution codified our God given right to have our own.

    • @troyholland70
      @troyholland70 Год назад +1

      It's you, the disease on democracy that is killing our once great country. Your an embarrassment and an entitled brainwashed Marxist socialist. No help for you, no charge required from us, only you. So move to a so called better country like Germany and China ya friggin traitor

    • @troyholland70
      @troyholland70 Год назад +1

      Hey a job or piss off

  • @AlBeZed
    @AlBeZed Год назад +41

    objection your Honour. there is no need for action. The crises is Mann-made, the climate is fine.
    reducing carbon is impossible, as well as unnecessary. CO2 is not a polluant.
    Let me put it in my words, sharing 30 years of observation in the real world and dedication to common sense:
    TIME and PROPORTIONS are the two key factors, which deliberately seem marked out, this time and in any kind of organised and imposed fanatical belief, aka agenda.
    In general, same as in real life, there is no urgency and it's ok as it is.
    There are two major aspects of existence, which we absolutely need to consider simultaneously. Big mistake, if we don't.
    1. Nature (and its climate) is simple.
    2. Trying to understand Nature ( its climate and weather) is phenomenonly complex, climate is following a chaotic pattern. Reliable predictions are impossible.
    My conclusion:
    Science is wrong by taking things apart, instead of looking at Nature in the long run and as a whole.
    Nature is in a constant state of change with the aim to keep the system balanced. It's capacity to "do" that is unlimited. Time doesn't matter. It's been doing it for billions of years. Eternally.
    Humanity and science are wrong in thinking, that we could "do it" , god or bad. Our influence on this system is ZERO, NADA, NIENTE. Not now, not as a consequence for the future.
    Having said that, doesn't mean we shouldn't care about nature and the environment. Of course we have to, but first understand basics, then respect time and proportions.
    There is no causality, CO2 does not have the alledged effect, it's the other way round. In a natural cycle, it's warmer and therefore we measure higher CO2 ppm counts in the atmosphere.
    Inevitably, a cooler period will follow, consequently CO2 ppm counts will go lower. Then maybe science would rightly conclude: CO2 is a tracer, not a polluant.
    Temperatures vary slightly, so is CO2 ... this is a correlation, scientifically mistaken as causality. Get back to work.

    • @t00ls742
      @t00ls742 Год назад +1

      I keep trying to tell people it is CO that is the problem...not CO2
      we cannot breathe a monoxide, but can breathe a dioxide...same as all living things to include plants

    • @AlBeZed
      @AlBeZed Год назад

      ​@@t00ls742 yeah, but not as such. CO is toxic in your body and blood. It's very reactive with O2 so in open air, it's not very stable and turns into CO2 almost immediately.
      inhaling some CO2 has no effect, exhaling CO2 is essential. Plants apparently need it for photosynthesis. 1200 ppm in real greenhouses is target for good growth of plants.
      Millions of years ago, we had up to 7'000 ppm in the atmosphere and 23 degrees Celsius on the ground. guess what happened?
      right. exponential growth, TRex & Co.
      so when considered properly, both molecules are no problem.
      If there was anything to be afraid of, it's the COLD , like in ice and iceage. It happened before, but nothing to worry about right now, it's natural. mankind survived the last ice age, whereas most Neandertal men got extinct ... got a second chance ... and currently try it again. alarmists should be taxed.

    • @ccreature7086
      @ccreature7086 11 месяцев назад

      I don't think the "science is wrong", I believe the ANALYSIS is wrong.
      What i don't understand is how so many models could be developed (with TAXPAYER'S MONEY) and none of the builders had the BALLS to make one that could accurately recreate the past. How can they sleep at night if what they made doesn't work?!?
      So much of this topic and government policy is built upon LIES - they KNOW what they're doing is wrong but they are as corrupt as the russian government taking payment for work that isn't done correctly. Just like the building inspectors in Turkey that accepted bribes and allowed construction of homes to be built that did not comply to standards and then collapse at the slightest earthquake tremor - THIS IS NEGLEGENT CORRUPTION !!

    • @jimmyf9545
      @jimmyf9545 9 месяцев назад

      You can't fix stupid. I present evidence here in the form of the og poster.

    • @jimmyf9545
      @jimmyf9545 9 месяцев назад

      ​@@t00ls742Boy, good thing we have you two geniuses around to keep us less enlightened ones knowledgeable. And the way you use the English language with your grammar skills. Excellent. My day was just made better.

  • @grahamlyons8522
    @grahamlyons8522 Год назад +28

    Climate change refers to natural long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns. It is NOT caused by human activities and especially NOT by the burning of fossil fuels.

    • @nelsonhelmutt5076
      @nelsonhelmutt5076 Год назад

      Oddly NASA Agrees with you even though they are not very loud with that official assertion

    • @jimmyf9545
      @jimmyf9545 9 месяцев назад

      Prove it. I'm waiting. You know more than 98% of the scientific community.

  • @andrebrouwers7464
    @andrebrouwers7464 Год назад +10

    Mr Neguse will actually destroy the future of his kids. What a sad and un- or badly educated individual.

  • @jamesbradley7227
    @jamesbradley7227 Год назад +6

    It's all about the Great reset. Get John christy

  • @woodwork5574
    @woodwork5574 5 лет назад +20

    I love Dr.Curry laughing at these crazy people thinking the climate can be changed enough to make s difference and that we can change climate At All.

    • @jimmyf9545
      @jimmyf9545 9 месяцев назад

      Yeah, you have all the facts. Not all these college graduate scientists.

  • @truelegoproductions
    @truelegoproductions 9 месяцев назад +2

    Reading these comments gives me hope!

  • @Chino780
    @Chino780 5 лет назад +15

    None of these politicians with their Catastrophe sermons have any clue what they are talking about. I wonder who wrote their notes for them.

    • @Triple5live
      @Triple5live 5 лет назад +2

      Chino780 exactly. The claim of being a family man doesn’t mean climate change is the real deal

    • @Chino780
      @Chino780 5 лет назад

      @mistercrowly86 Please explain.

    • @Captain-Sum.Ting-Wong
      @Captain-Sum.Ting-Wong 5 лет назад

      So you think the scientists don't have any clue what they are talking about? You're pathetic.

    • @Chino780
      @Chino780 5 лет назад

      Captain Sum Ting Wong Is that what I said?

    • @Captain-Sum.Ting-Wong
      @Captain-Sum.Ting-Wong 5 лет назад

      Uh, yes. The Democrats are simply saying what the climate scientists and other experts are saying. And looking at your other comments where you deny the realities of climate change, that makes it even more clear.

  • @ctrockstar7168
    @ctrockstar7168 Год назад +3

    There’s a bunch of money to be made by members of the committee and congress if we hurry

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад +2

    We had a company that managed their own forest well and continuous logging for one over 100 years but the family owned business was leveraged out of business and the old growth forest was completely clearcut in 20 despite wide spread protest of clearcut in the the last forest area. The old growth forest is another type of forest this was the last area in California.. The campaign to eliminate nitrogen gas production is still working on the old growth forest.

  • @michaelharrison7072
    @michaelharrison7072 10 месяцев назад +1

    So much hot air and no need to act foolishly as some have.

  • @woodwork5574
    @woodwork5574 5 лет назад +6

    Worry about people health when there is no gas to deliver your groceries downtown.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад +2

    They're supposed to remember the FEMA changed their emphasis after recognition of the rising oceans in the ,1980s . They were not rebuilding but were relocating people out of flood plains.

  • @BelisarioHRomo
    @BelisarioHRomo 11 месяцев назад +3

    There is a Malthusian perspective that believes there are too many people, and there is a bias towards industrializing human extermination in order to reduce selectively (by them) population to the minimum while the governance controls everything, absolutely everything. The forcible imposition of "transitioning to clean sustainable green energies" (that does not exist) away from hydrocarbon fuels is seen by climate change catastrophists as the right weapon to set back the advanced industrial society's ability to sustain the current population. They understand that moving away from these fuels will have consequences, including loss of life, which aligns with their ideology. Hydrocarbon fuels have become essential for capitalism and modern industrial society. Without them, we would be unable to maintain our current level of production and operations, leading to potential loss of life. This hidden agenda is intertwined with the global warming movement, which has evolved to incorporate concepts like ending racism to save the planet. The underlying bias is that by eliminating hydrocarbon fuels and capitalism, they can achieve depopulation and de-industrialization goals. However, this perspective is fundamentally flawed and self-destructive, except for the elite who believe they will own the earth, and control the outcome, leaving the rest to suffer and die. The reality is that the Earth is not a stable and predictable place, and we should take advantage of prosperous times, such as the current interglacial warming period. Therefore, it is crucial to make the most of the opportunities available to us now. and STOP STUPIDITY GREED AND DOGMA.

    • @jimmyf9545
      @jimmyf9545 9 месяцев назад +1

      You just spewed a lot of nothing. Congratulations!

    • @trimansells
      @trimansells 5 месяцев назад

      Truth!

  • @TK-qm8rb
    @TK-qm8rb Год назад +4

    Trump for speaker of the house! Make 2023 the year we impeach Biden and Harris!

    • @popeye1250
      @popeye1250 Год назад

      That whole (extended) Biden crime family is a perfect case for applying the R.I.C.O. statutes.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 Год назад

      Conspiracy Forever!

  • @woodwork5574
    @woodwork5574 5 лет назад +10

    Dr.Curry is the only sane voice in this hearing.

  • @thomaslawson4253
    @thomaslawson4253 Год назад +6

    the 1.5 degree rise in global warming over 100 years (possibly caused by increased carbon ) can only have one effect and that is to melt glacial ice causing a rise in sea levels. since the rise in sea levels is so small it cannot be measured in an accurate manner than the effect 0f increased carbon cannot be much. all wild assed speculation on increased extreme weather is not backed up by data.the glaciers seen in the early 19th century were formed during the little ice age. forest fires(80 %which are caused by people) are not effected by a small changed in temperature. while milder winters are somewhat evident this could be a normal cycle.warming dose not cause drought since the hotter areas of the world are also the wettest. the on going attempts at green energy are causing severe problems to our grid which will soon cause electric blackout.

    • @controversiallygreg311
      @controversiallygreg311 Год назад

      There is little or no scientific evidence of a 1.5 degree AVERAGE rise in temp. over the last 100 years.
      If for no other reason than if you employed 5,000 scientists (as the UN did for the IPCC Paper, showing the result they require for The WEF & Davos man, by selecting data and a period for the data, together with a theoretical model of Climate and ran it all through a selected, custom written piece of computer software - You now have a commedy of errors published by The UN and denounced by a very large % of the scientists who are attributed as having contributed - who contend their names should be removed as their contribution was to deny the accuracy of this giant work of fiction!)
      Anyway let us consider 5,000 scientists deciding on an average temperature in my garden and the adjoining 11 acre field and the orchard, for a period of a month. Now match them against another 5,000 acting independently - I guarantee they could not establish an accurate average temperature - they could merely provide an average of the range of temperatures they had arrived at. Nor would one group of 5,000 agree with another!
      I have long said the derivation of the word weather is a miss-spelling as The Whether Man hasn't a clue whether it will rain or shine in a week's time, let alone a month a year or a decade!
      Never forget the consensus of scientists was at one time that the world was flat!
      Do not forget Galileo was placed under house arrest for his scientific heresy in declaring that the sun, stars and firmament did not revolve around the world!
      You will no doubt be aware that for a large part of history the consensus was that the world was flat and being carried on the back of a tortoise!
      The IPCC maunderings are just a self serving modern version of the same fantasies - I suggest you read it and note its own failure to come to any actual scientific conclusion and the prodigious number of caveats contained therein - It is about as accurate as the Netflix pack of lies emanating from the unhinged Meghan & Harry Windsor! It also is a yarn spun for money.
      Are you aware that it is impossible to scientifically measure the amount of CO2 in our planet's atmosphere - one can merely estimate it. The best guess is that it accounts for 0.04% of our atmosphere of which the activities of all of man in all of history has contributed at most 0.03%
      Now stop and think for a moment - The Chinese people exhale around 3,381,000,000lbs of CO2 a day! Not to mention the output of their 2,363 coal fired power stations and the 1,171 being built - Of course much of this coal is purchased from Australia thus keeping their economy afloat!
      Be minded that a prodigious amount of that coal is used to make exports to the rest of the world. In the WOKE Green Energy Scam scenario of western world we have exported much of our industry and a huge amount of our jobs to China and India - so as not to use coal, oil and gas (We just gut down gazzillions of acres of trees & crops to make Biomass! And use Billions of tons of oil to import what we need from China & India!
      We mustn't forget just how many Billions of tons of coal are used to make steel, re-bar etc for oh so green and useless wind-turbines & a prodigious amount of coal is required to make the Millions of square miles of glass for solar panels which most of the time are grossly inefficient not to mention the squillions of tons of coal used to make cement for wind-turbine plinths!
      Then of course there is the huge use of child labour and slave wages paid to mine the 500,000lbs of the earth's crust to get enough minerals to make ONE car battery so that is 18,000,000,000,000lbs for the batteries for the 36,000,000 cars in Britain alone, that are supposed to be electric by 2913 - not to mention the fact there is insufficient copper on the planet for the windings in the electric motors!
      Net Zero is clearly a guarantee for bankruptcy, starvation and war!

    • @roberthicks1612
      @roberthicks1612 Год назад

      "can only have one effect and that is to melt glacial ice" The real question is, which came first, the melting of the ice or the raise in temperature? Think about it. If you have a lot of ice, and it melts, will that cause the temperature to rise? Water acts as a heat storage. When it is low, it forms a solid (ice) and when it has more energy, it becomes a liquid (water) then when more energy is added, it becomes a gas (steam). During the little ice age, something blocked a lot of energy from hitting the earth so glaciers around the world advanced. This is because the earth was storing less energy. Then in the mid 1600, the earth started getting more energy and the glaciers began to retreat, thus raising the temperature of the earth.

  • @careyjamesmajeski3203
    @careyjamesmajeski3203 9 месяцев назад

    Fire broke out because of “hot wind”?!?! Come on…. That’s ludicrous.

  • @pakurilecz
    @pakurilecz 5 лет назад +3

    I'm not getting the hearing. i'm getting a whole lot of clips and snips

  • @controversiallygreg311
    @controversiallygreg311 Год назад +3

    Please note the following caveat placed on many websites, Twitter, Wikipedia etc:
    Please note the following caveat placed on many websites, Twitter, Wikipedia, RUclips etc:
    Climate change United Nations:
    "Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns, mainly caused by human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels."
    This is at best bias, propaganda, exaggeration or based on deliberate social engineering.
    Sadly it is based on computer models designed to produce the desired result for those commissioning the prediction.
    In reality the statement would seem to be a lie.
    May I suggest YOU read the full IPCC Report, which fails to support the claim!
    May I remind you that for centuries the consensus of scientists were claimed to believe the Earth was flat
    & the consensus of scientists & the whole of the Catholic Church agreed the Sun, planets & stars all revolved around our planet!
    Real science has never been reliable and has always depended on debate, new information & proof!
    Remember around 80% of electricity we use is generated by Oil, Gas & other, so called Fossil Fuels & there is no scientific proof that CO2 causes Climate Change OR Global Warming!
    ATMOSPHERIC CO2 - 01
    Our planet has had a changing climate, with periods of warming, cooling & ice ages for 4.6BILLION years.
    Very late in the day:
    Primates emerged around 165,000,000 years ago, then
    Mankind started to emerge about 150,000 years ago, Denisovans & Neandertals about 80,000 years ago and then Homosapiens.
    We survived the last ice age and started farming around 20,000 years ago and the end of the ice age around 13,000 brought about extensive settled farming and towns and cities burgeoned.
    In around 1810 mankind numbered 1Billion, now we have reached 8Billion.
    Never have we been so healthy, well fed, well housed and had so much choice. Our life expectancy in 1909 was around 42 it is now over 80 as a result of developement, initiative, invention and medicine all of which was gifted to the world having been, in the main created by the Western Civilisations.

    • @kevinoneill41
      @kevinoneill41 Год назад +1

      The first sign of up right man was 1.5 million years ago. Is this not been carbon dated?

    • @grahamlyons8522
      @grahamlyons8522 Год назад

      @ Controversially Greg
      "Never have we been so healthy, well fed, well housed and had so much choice. Our life expectancy in 1909 was around 42 it is now over 80 as a result of development, initiative, invention and medicine all of which was gifted to the world has been, in the main created by the Western Civilisations."
      All were made possible by the use of coal and gas for energy.

    • @controversiallygreg311
      @controversiallygreg311 Год назад

      @@kevinoneill41 I appreciate I have over simplified as there were around 7 or 8 notable forerunners of mankind:
      Homo Habilis a sport of hominids existing from around 2.4 to 1.4M years ago. They were around for seemingly 1M yrs. making them far more successful, in terms of survival, than Homo Sapiens seems likely to be!
      Homo Rudolfensis is another extinct hominid species were around 1.9 & 1.8M years ago.
      Homo Erectus is an extinct sport of early human seemingly lived through the challenges of the Pleistocene period that’s about 1.9M years to about 143,000 years ago. They were seemingly spread from Africa, through India, China, Java & Georgia, largely south of the ice sheet!
      Homo Heidelbergensis lived between 700,000 and 200,000 years ago.
      Homo Floresiensis seemingly survived from 95,000 to 17,000 years ago in Indonesia, but were diminutive (3.5ft.) with a much smaller brain but there are signs of use of stone tools!
      As they became extinct some sports even left traces of their DNA in modern man such as the Neanderthals & Denisovans.
      Neanderthals which were one of the widespread precursors of man seem to have co existed having been around from around 160,000 & 30,000 years ago & were seemingly fairly widespread in Europe & central Asia - they account for about 0.012% of mankind’s DNA, thought to be as a result of very limited interbreeding!
      However making some allowance for them I stand by my dating - be minded that the earliest fossil record of mankind found to date were a small group (two adults and a child) found in Ethiopia, they dated to around some time between 160,000 and 40,000 years before our modern times.
      It is believed hominids were largely wiped out by one of the many periods of natural Climate Changes our planet has experienced in the 4.6Billion years Earth has hurtled through space, with its Climate largely dictated by The Sun (our local Star), Volcanism & Plate Tectonics with the occasional asteroid strike!
      When Homo Sapiens emerged in Europe around 44,000 years ago, dated remains having been found in Bacho Kiro caves in Bulgaria.
      There would seem to be evidence from about that date in The Middle East also - the evidence indicates itinerant hunter gatherers progressing to limited herdsmen moving seasonally, but it was not until the present period of warming that commenced around 12,000 years ago that the ending of the iceage gave rise to development towards widespread settled farming - though such places as Gobekli Tepe and Catal Hoyuk emerged mystifyingly soon!
      These anomalies are bound to occur when you consider just how limited our knowledge of what brought about the end of the Bronze Age and the civilisations of the Hitites, Babylonians, Assyrians, Egyptians, Minoans etc - who seem to have vanished very rapidly around 1177BCE!
      I apologise for over simplifying, for the sake of brevity, both in the first entry and even here, on those grounds I stand by my precis of the last few Million years!
      If a booklist would help you I am happy to fossick through my library and make some suggestions.
      To view the original article CLICK HERE

    • @controversiallygreg311
      @controversiallygreg311 Год назад

      @@grahamlyons8522 There is little or no scientific evidence of a 1.5 degree AVERAGE rise in temp. over the last 100 years. If for no other reason than if you employed 5,000 scientists -
      (as the UN did for the IPCC Paper, showing the result they require for The WEF & Davos man, by selecting data and a period for the data, together with a theoretical model of Climate and ran it all through a selected, custom written piece of computer software - You now have a comedy of errors published by The UN and denounced by a very large % of the scientists who are attributed as having contributed - who contend their names should be removed as their contribution was to deny the accuracy of this giant work of fiction!)
      Anyway let us consider 5,000 scientists deciding on an average temperature in my garden and the adjoining 11 acre field and the orchard, for a period of a month. Now match them against another 5,000 acting independently - I guarantee they could not establish an accurate average temperature - they could merely provide an average of the range of temperatures they had arrived at. Nor would one group of 5,000 agree with another!
      I have long said the derivation of the word weather is a miss-spelling as The Whether Man hasn't a clue whether it will rain or shine in a week's time, let alone a month a year or a decade!
      Never forget: The consensus of scientists was at one time that the world was flat!
      Do not forget: Galileo was placed under house arrest for his scientific heresy in declaring that the sun, stars and firmament did not revolve around the world!
      You will no doubt be aware: For a large part of history the consensus was that the world was flat and being carried on the back of a tortoise!
      The IPCC maunderings are just a self serving modern variation of the same fantasies.
      I suggest you read The IPCC Paper on Climate Change and note its own failure to come to any actual scientific conclusion and the prodigious number of caveats contained therein - It is about as accurate as the Netflix pack of lies emanating from the unhinged Meghan & Harry Windsor! It also is a yarn spun for money.
      Are you aware that it is impossible to scientifically measure the amount of CO2 in our planet's atmosphere - one can merely estimate it. The best guess is that it accounts for 0.04% of our atmosphere of which the activities of all of man in all of history has contributed at most 3.225% of that total!
      Now stop and think for a moment - The Chinese people exhale around 3,381,000,000lbs of CO2 a day! Not to mention the output of their 2,363 coal fired power stations and the 1,171 being built - Of course much of this coal is purchased from Australia thus keeping their economy afloat!
      Be minded that a prodigious amount of that coal is used to make exports to the rest of the world. In the WOKE Green Energy Scam scenario of western world we have exported much of our industry and a huge amount of our jobs to China and India - so as not to use coal, oil and gas (We just gut down gazzillions of acres of trees & crops to make Biomass! And use Billions of tons of oil to import what we need from China & India!
      We mustn't forget just how many Billions of tons of coal are used to make steel, re-bar etc for oh so green and useless wind-turbines & a prodigious amount of coal is required to make the Millions of square miles of glass for solar panels which most of the time are grossly inefficient not to mention the squillions of tons of coal used to make cement for wind-turbine plinths!
      Then of course there is the huge use of child labour and slave wages paid to mine the 500,000lbs of the earth's crust to get enough minerals to make ONE car battery so that is 18,000,000,000,000lbs for the batteries for the 36,000,000 cars in Britain alone, that are supposed to be electric by 2913 - not to mention the fact there is insufficient copper on the planet for the windings in the electric motors!
      Net Zero is clearly a guarantee for bankruptcy, starvation and war!

  • @alexandrawhitelock6195
    @alexandrawhitelock6195 Год назад

    "Soon your wood burning stove will be illegal". In VT, wood heat is primary…the house soon will ban fuel heat…except for wood or electric. So if they ban wood heat everyone would hVe to go electric…insane for VT. I am selling and moving…

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    We don't need wind power or nuclear power plants. They are both obsolete form's of generating electricity. The generator invented by Thomas A Edison didn't use water wind or fossil fuels. He used the field magnets to move the armature magnets and coils of copper wire. This AC power continuous peak power without fuel was used to power dynamos with inverters and transformers. One 140 amp generator with inverters cam power a grid of dynamos with inverters and transformers to deliver any amount of current and voltage AC power to the power lines without fuel cost. The PUC was created by Congress to assure these inexpensive power plants were used instead of expensive hydroelectric and fossil fuels power plants. They did fail to support the Edison generator and dynamos power plants.

  • @vmarshall
    @vmarshall 10 месяцев назад +1

    Will violent storms stop? Will hurricanes end? Do humans imagine they can end floodings and storms? Is it believed the weather will become gentle for humans if we dedicate our futures to controlling unappreciated emissions? 😅 😮

  • @user-tm5id7te6l
    @user-tm5id7te6l 2 месяца назад

    He doesn't address the assertion that climate tragedies have always been this bad.

  • @ecd14u
    @ecd14u Год назад

    What is MR.GRIJALVA on? I do not want any of it! There is no climate emergency!

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    The Edison generator power plants can be used as individual power plants for farm's and houses. .The dynamo with a rechargeable battery to move the Dynamo and be recharged by the dynamo as it is powering the car reduces fossil fuels use and emissions.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    Reduce high voltage AC power lines with Edison generators and dynamos power plants would increase reliability of power transmission.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    The government land is land to be managed not land to be sold. We promised to hold the land for posterity not ambition.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    We are grossly misinformed about power generation and power use as well as global warming and global infertility.

  • @premalalperera4710
    @premalalperera4710 10 месяцев назад

    Any reason why these forest fires occur repeatedly in places like the western nations including Australia and not in Africa or Asia or even South America?

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    The oceans are warming and the ice is melting. These are significant in our known scope of geology. There is no restoration of energy balance in these hearings. We have agreed to end serious and persistent damaging effects of chemical weapons and nuclear technology but we have not carried out any reduction of halogenated vinyl halogenated carbon or nuclear technology. The shift from the waste of fossil fuels for electricity and transportation has not been done either. We have Edison generators and dynamos power plants and vehicles to replace nuclear power plants and fossil fuels power plants and vehicles. We should not have any trouble shifting to edison generator and dynamos power plants and vehicles. While we shut down halogenated vinyl and halogenated carbon to increase fish population across the world 🌎 and improve atmosphere level and reduce ionization from halogenated vinyl halogenated carbon and nuclear technology.

  • @maureentibbetts8802
    @maureentibbetts8802 Год назад +4

    God is in charge of our climate

  • @forsberg7328
    @forsberg7328 10 месяцев назад

    He talks about wild fires of which are all either Prescribed burns and farm burn offs.Just one in Bannf Canada was a prescribed burn that went out of control.A fire needs someone to ignite it .I have followed fires for over 20 years.Slash instead Instead of using fire.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    FEMA should continue to relocate
    people instead of rebuilding to continue to move people out of the rising oceans. It's already about 4 feet of rise since 1953. USGS surveys numbers compared to the present reveal the real and present rise in ocean level since USGS established sea level in 1953 for the national topographic map of the USA

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    Can we build Edison generator and dynamos power plants and vehicles to replace nuclear power plants and fossil fuels use in Massachusetts.??.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    We are grossly misinformed about power generation and power use. You have my permission to mention the reality of Edison generators that are permanent magnet motor as a generator and do not have magnets all around the armature like s Tesla hydroelectric generator common to our minds.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад +1

    The house resources committee meeting as usual without preparing the population of the USA for the hearing. The discussion of industrial pollution that is relevant to climate change global warming and global infertility is constantly missing from every discussion. While the gross misinformation regarding power generation continues with out change.

    • @jimmyf9545
      @jimmyf9545 9 месяцев назад

      Jesus Christ, what the hell are you saying?

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    Are we going to hear the shameless ommission of serious and persistent damaging effects of chemical weapons manufacturing use and stockpile disposal?

  • @lisacoleman1059
    @lisacoleman1059 Год назад +2

    No

  • @woodwork5574
    @woodwork5574 5 лет назад +3

    OMG a Rev. is actually here lending his “expert” testimony.
    Can I GET AN AMEN

  • @alexandrawhitelock6195
    @alexandrawhitelock6195 Год назад

    Applaud Dr Curry. Re: natural gas…it will very soon be banned in W.NY…includes Buffalo…insanity

  • @woodwork5574
    @woodwork5574 5 лет назад +3

    Stop SCARING EVERYONE Miss Co Chair.

  • @jonathanoconnor9546
    @jonathanoconnor9546 Год назад

    16,000 years ago no residual snow during summer at Chicago. 12,000 yrs ago a 2 mile high glacier over Chicago gouging out the Great Lakes. 7,000 yrs ago it was warm enough that there was a warm inland sea in Iceland. (Happy to provide a video with an Icelandic Glaciologist saying so). From 1300 to 1890 we were in the Little Ice Age. Since humans are responsible for Climate Change, what is the Industrial Activity we humans keep turning on and off? (What kind of technology did we have 16,000 yrs ago when it was warm? Ans: Hunter/Gatherer. No sign of even simple agriculture... pre horse drawn plows, yet warm.)
    From Ice Core Samples 500 million yrs ago CO2 conc in the atmospehere was 4,000 ppm. Today it is 400 ppm. What were we humans doing 500 million yrs ago to make the CO2 *Ten Times* today's CO2 conc ?

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 Год назад

      Why don't YOU go find out? You seem to KNOW everything about climate science. Oh dear, what am I thinking? Being a moron you wouldn't think that there are LOTS of other FACTORS determining the Earth's average temperature, not just the co2.
      Explain the Keeling Curve please as a start.
      55 years of Oil & Gas Lobby narrative works wonders does it not?

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 Год назад

      Hello? Bueller?
      Why don't YOU go find out? You seem to KNOW everything about climate science. Oh dear, what am I thinking? Being a moron you wouldn't think that there are LOTS of other FACTORS determining the Earth's average temperature, not just the co2.
      Explain the Keeling Curve please as a start.
      55 years of Oil & Gas Lobby narrative works wonders does it not?

    • @jonathanoconnor9546
      @jonathanoconnor9546 Год назад

      @@mrunning10 A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Global Warming
      ruclips.net/video/RZlICdawHRA/видео.html

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 Год назад

      ​@@jonathanoconnor9546 Ya, this clown again. Heywood, BS in Business. Gee whiz I surely do trust him when it comes to the fucking climate. Hey Heywood what's the fucking Keeling Curve? And paid as well, receives grant funding for "studies" from the fucking Oil Lobby. Gee, what the fuck do you think his CONCLUSIONS will turn out to be?? Support of renewables or support for Oil ??? Wake the F*** UP.
      Typical conspiracy, tech or no tech has fucking NOTHING to do with the confirmed measurements year to year that the planet is experiencing WARMING. Can you get that through your conspiracy head? (most likely NOPE)
      And he's fucking WRONG and LYING, quoting from the "450 Report" that was fucking FUNDED by an Oil Lobby. Wake the F**** UP please.
      Funded by an Oil Lobby. Funded by an Oil Lobby. Wake the F*** UP.
      And the TECH is here NOW, has been for 30 years, and is PROVEN and WORKS, we just have to build it. Germany had a helium bed reactor over 30 years ago, 20% solar cells are here fucking NOW, geothermal has ALWAYS worked.
      YOU are BRAINWASHED by 50 years of Oil & Gas Lobby narrative PAYING for Congressmen to get elected to keep the OBSCENE profits going and going and going
      THAT is the fucking CONSPIRACY. This clown is FUNDED by Oil & Gas Lobby and morons listen to him to confirm that conspiracy hole in the head.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    Are we going to hear the shameless ommission of the effects of nuclear technology?

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    We are grossly misinformed about power generation and climate change global warming and global infertility.

  • @stuartDEgane
    @stuartDEgane 5 лет назад +6

    SO does the massive movement in the magnetic North Pole have nothing to do with the change in weather patterns??

    • @neilpederson1467
      @neilpederson1467 5 лет назад +1

      no

    • @revahill2074
      @revahill2074 5 лет назад +1

      No, actually.

    • @revahill2074
      @revahill2074 5 лет назад +1

      Reverse the cause and effect.: climate change->melting ice->mass loss->pole shift

    • @neilpederson1467
      @neilpederson1467 5 лет назад +1

      Reva Hill Changing climate (more intense heat waves, heavy rain, intense/large fires, warming, increased tree death by heat, drought, and beetles) is strongly being driven by human activities and elevated CO2 in the atmosphere

    • @revahill2074
      @revahill2074 5 лет назад

      @@neilpederson1467 yes, all those things are happening, driven by CO2 & other GHG emissions trapping heat in the atmosphere, NOT by the changes in Magnetic North. Magnetic North is changing. It has changed before. It does not cause climate change.

  • @jonmorda7256
    @jonmorda7256 5 месяцев назад

    Why are they showing a forest fire under a climate change caption? Is climate change responsible for every disaster now???

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    The worry of acid rain was actually propaganda control ignoring substantial reality of alkaline rain. The concern of ozone never mentioned the bulk of ozone had been lost 19 00 to 1947.

    • @markcampbell7577
      @markcampbell7577 Год назад

      We reduced the production of sulphate and nitrate pollution. This pollutant causes basic rain. We did get improvement in the health of the forests with pollution control but the problem was basic rain from atmosphere ionization from halogenated vinyl and halogenated carbon free radicals due to sunlight and heat.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    The oceans are warming and the diversity of life is decreasing and the atmosphere is declining in depth. These primary effects are serious and persistent damaging effects caused by halogenated vinyl halogenated carbon and nuclear technology that we have agreed to eliminate in Treaty obligations and enforcement in the 1970s and 1980s. We have not done the work we agreed to do yet. Edison generators and dynamos power plants and vehicles easily replace fossil fuels and nuclear power plants. The synthetic material needs a lot of research to have replacement material but we are not going to be able to wait.

  • @larkljc
    @larkljc 9 месяцев назад

    There is no consensus. Stop politicizing science.

  • @torino390
    @torino390 Год назад +2

    Lol! I've never heard so much garbage and fear mongering.
    Plot twist, the climate is just fine. 😉

  • @larrylegg8245
    @larrylegg8245 Год назад +2

    THIS IS PROPAGANDA LIES AND B.S.

  • @lappo2534
    @lappo2534 11 месяцев назад

    John Christy 2015

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    The fires recently came about luckily in time to save the atmosphere from total absence due to one million tons of VX nerve agent release from Georgia USA chemical weapons dump. If the fires recently did not happen minus 200 degrees Fahrenheit winter would be common if at all.

    • @jimmyf9545
      @jimmyf9545 9 месяцев назад

      Wtf? Dude, back in the bunker for you.

  • @woodwork5574
    @woodwork5574 5 лет назад +4

    Hahaha And you think we are going to stop hurricanes.

  • @peapod8
    @peapod8 Год назад +1

    Expounding in strained high-pitched tirades. I smell BS. How 'bout you?

  • @woodwork5574
    @woodwork5574 5 лет назад +2

    Preach man Preach.Rev.Yearwood completely changed my mind.....not.

  • @woodwork5574
    @woodwork5574 5 лет назад +4

    Ms.Nazar you are not a scientist.

  • @maureentibbetts8802
    @maureentibbetts8802 Год назад

    I doubt what you are saying

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    We could build Edison generator and dynamos power plants to replace nuclear power plants and fossil fuels power plants and vehicles.. BS biology BA chemistry MA toxicology certified radiation safety State of California environmental industrial toxicology and environmental restoration.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    Edison generators or battery powered dynamo powered electric cars trucks trains airplanes helicopters and ships immediately reduce fossil fuels use with unlimited range electric power vehicles. We are grossly misinformed about power generation and power use in cars trucks trains airplanes helicopters and ships.

  • @maureentibbetts8802
    @maureentibbetts8802 Год назад +1

    You cannot control the climate, sorry

  • @sam-fc9ky
    @sam-fc9ky Год назад

    God is in control

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 Год назад

      Except he left the fucking planet to us. wake the fuck up.

  • @julianafontaine974
    @julianafontaine974 5 лет назад

    Bonsoir bonne vidéo bravo à vous je likeee 14
    Amitié juliana

  • @arcanaco
    @arcanaco 5 лет назад +5

    Suggestion Box:
    Update ALL State USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Maps to reflect regional and local climate changes.
    Commission Army Corps of Engineers to design floodwater drainage purification and transportation pipeline networks
    Establish American Farm Corps network to link Farmers with US Citizen workers and volunteers for seasonal job and internship opportunities.
    Offer tax credits, start-up loans and complete online educational resources to Homesteaders operating 50% or more from renewable home based power supply such as solar or small scale windmills.
    Secure all US power grids against EMP or other disasterous event

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    We have been suffering declining fish populations since the invention of halogenated vinyl and halogenated carbon in 1920s. The declining fish populations begins and it was eventually discovered the mechanics of sperm count loss of all species was caused by the free radicals from halogenated vinyl and halogenated carbon molecules in the environment were interfering with the polarity of protein when sperm motility is used. The fishing or overfishing has never been a significant cause of decline in fish populations.. The EPA mission under treaty enforcement and obligations were supposed to focus on the elimination of halogenated vinyl and halogenated carbon pollution because of the known cause of global warming and global infertility of chemical weapons manufacturing use and stockpile disposal.

  • @tomcodd476
    @tomcodd476 11 месяцев назад

    All a big con

  • @woodwork5574
    @woodwork5574 5 лет назад +1

    Never will we bend to government control of our lives via climate but bag religious zealots.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 Год назад

    The plants do not use carbon dioxide gas
    The plants produce carbon dioxide and idea the carbolic acid formed as the carbon source for sugar and cellulose. Do not waste fossil fuels to generate electricity and transportation
    We are capable of generating electricity easily without fossil fuels and we can manufacture unlimited range electric power vehicles without fuel or recharge stations using generators or battery powered dynamos to power the electric motor.

  • @alyssaatwood7049
    @alyssaatwood7049 5 лет назад +5

    Thank you Dr. Cobb for advocating for science-based solutions to protect our natural resources and the communities that depend on them. It is indeed not too late to avoid the most damaging impacts of future climate change.

    • @rosesummers5075
      @rosesummers5075 Год назад

      If the funding stopped today for all the programs to control the climate I bet the real weather would continue being unpredictable and on a average day you might see some rain in California without flooding.

  • @jamesday1638
    @jamesday1638 Год назад

    I BELIEVE GOD CONTROLS THE CLIMATE THE GREATER THE SIN IN THE WORLD THE MORE FLOODING AND SERVER THE WEATHER GETS. THE MORE FIRES RIOTS AND UNREST THIER WILL BE. LIVE YOUR LIVES AND STOP SINING. GOD WILL BLESS US WITH GOOD WEATHER. DO YOU BELIEVE MEN OR GOD..MEN ARE NOT PERFECT GOD IS PERFECTION. THIER IS NOTHING THAT YOU WILL EVER EMAGINE YOU CAN'T FIX WHAT DOESN'T EXIST. YOU THINK YOU ARE GOD'S

  • @timothydoyle4122
    @timothydoyle4122 4 месяца назад

    clown show

  • @LeadingEdgePropertie
    @LeadingEdgePropertie 5 лет назад

    Me Hollie is the voice of reason and Pragmatism. Dr Curry disappoints by being bland and uninformative.

    • @Captain-Sum.Ting-Wong
      @Captain-Sum.Ting-Wong 5 лет назад +1

      He didn't even try to hide his shilling for the natural gas industry.

    • @richardellis2955
      @richardellis2955 Год назад +3

      Dr Curry is a champion of Truth. One of the many honest climate scientist that walked away from the corrupt UN IPCC

  • @karolokuniewicz9705
    @karolokuniewicz9705 Год назад

    Curry is a liar. You what has happened in US in terms of water access, crop failure, wild fires, floods, landslides, hurricanes, snowfalls and heatwaves. She calls it "oversimplification". I wish here to lose a house in one of such events promptly so she will be able to say first hand how it is when your life is oversimplified by Big Oil interest and science denial.

    • @controversiallygreg311
      @controversiallygreg311 Год назад

      What utter drivel!
      Attendees & advocates of the WEF, Davos, COP1 to 30, Greens and their like should be rounded up and charged with Crimes Against Humanity.

  • @davidandsherryprudhomme3j131
    @davidandsherryprudhomme3j131 Год назад

    Read the Bible for proof

  • @Axeman1957Ca
    @Axeman1957Ca Год назад +1

    @climatehoax