There's only one thing I would change about the simulation. Have the background being displayed in the windows spin to simulate geocentric force. If they have gravity in the pod, the pod would have to be rotating at a certain speed to simulate that. And short of literally having a rotating pod, simply showing the "space" outside spinning would make it more realistic.
I think they are thinking in terms of pretty small things, and using centrifugal forces to simulate earth's gravity requires huge ships, because otherwise "gravity" will impact different heights of a human and cause huge problems. NASA thinks in falcon heavy/vulcan and orion size, not Starship size
Fascinating show as per usual, with a depth of coverage and likable presenters that make it engrossing. I thought the NASA robot was rather slow next to Boston Dynamics Atlas, who can now move without pulleys and overhead cabling, perhaps they could strike a deal with NASA to offer their robots for the mission, or an adapted model? I'd love to go to space, as an INTJ science nut who is also an artist and very practical, but my sense of surreal humour would probably drive everyone else crazy lol!
BD's Atlas makes this Nasa effort look like a toy ... as Nasa are already working with BD's Spot robot dogs (for potentially exploring Mars) I don't get why they are wasting funds trying to develop their own bipedal robot 🤷♂️
For efficiency, since there is a 10 min delay is better to have e conversation in sets of 10 or more questions at once and then the answers for a wider bandwidth in communication
If questions aren't interdependent, this is probably how it will be done. But when an answer to a question determines what question will be asked next, you would still have to wait for 10 minutes.
0:48 I believe this would be easier with a 3D mouse such as those made by 3Dconnexion. That way you would only have one thing to control the vehicle with. 8:45 I do see one such device here.
Nope. You can't properly control 2 independent axles sufficiently well with a Space Navigator. I own one, and can assure you of this fact. Also, joysticks and such things are the worst possible controllers for a wheeled vehicle. But you are unaware of this basic fact. That is why the wonderful "steering wheel" was invented.
I couldn't think of anything worse than being part of Bezos's expedition to Mars. Taking into consideration the experiences of his Amazon staff: you'd be overworked, underpaid, forced to pee in bottles, and occasionally thumped by a robot. He'd be out that airlock in the first week.
we either become multiplanetary or we perish with the earth. Also something like this is best started early so we can make mistakes and improve before its too late
Robotic companies are way ahead of NASA... Come on guy's, put your heads together and keep your pride aside... Otherwise, it will take 40-50 years, like it already has...
Overall the other minutiae on here is going to be useless. We won’t be shooting the moon anytime soon either. Big dreams without Oil. I don’t see it happening.
I dont understand one thing, we still live with covid and why not do some homework and prioritise real world problems instead of stepping foot and possibly spreading Covid to Martians. Such an ignorant world we live in.
Plenty of amazing technologies have come out of Nasa and similar groups. As long as humans exist, this world will have problems. We can have temporary fixes like feeding people, or permanent fixes like advancing technology.
its a bit weird when NASA couldnt "land" on the moon again. maybe in the 60s, no other country can use the sattelite to see the U S is setting a Moon atmosphere in MOJAVE desert.
@@rcisneros8567 thanks for reply back , the poor would never get a chance to visit NASA , and I wish BBC understand that when producing this amazing show .
This was first shown in July 2019, why repeat it now as though it's a new episode?
Awesome. More about space technologies.
11:05 motivation is important. The crew talks about personality types, and how they would work together.
There's only one thing I would change about the simulation. Have the background being displayed in the windows spin to simulate geocentric force. If they have gravity in the pod, the pod would have to be rotating at a certain speed to simulate that. And short of literally having a rotating pod, simply showing the "space" outside spinning would make it more realistic.
I think they are thinking in terms of pretty small things, and using centrifugal forces to simulate earth's gravity requires huge ships, because otherwise "gravity" will impact different heights of a human and cause huge problems. NASA thinks in falcon heavy/vulcan and orion size, not Starship size
Thank you for sharing.
I predict that Tesla bots will be the first robots deployed on Mars.
Too late, NASA beat them to it years ago. Wheeled robots with a robotic arm.
@@mikeomolt4485 True. I meant “humanoid”robots.
Fascinating show as per usual, with a depth of coverage and likable presenters that make it engrossing. I thought the NASA robot was rather slow next to Boston Dynamics Atlas, who can now move without pulleys and overhead cabling, perhaps they could strike a deal with NASA to offer their robots for the mission, or an adapted model?
I'd love to go to space, as an INTJ science nut who is also an artist and very practical, but my sense of surreal humour would probably drive everyone else crazy lol!
BD's Atlas makes this Nasa effort look like a toy ... as Nasa are already working with BD's Spot robot dogs (for potentially exploring Mars) I don't get why they are wasting funds trying to develop their own bipedal robot 🤷♂️
@@MotoGoato Nasa is great at wasting $... Wait you didn't think they did serious work.
For efficiency, since there is a 10 min delay is better to have e conversation in sets of 10 or more questions at once and then the answers for a wider bandwidth in communication
If questions aren't interdependent, this is probably how it will be done. But when an answer to a question determines what question will be asked next, you would still have to wait for 10 minutes.
Amazing! - sjsrana
I notice the Grecian 2000 technology still works very well. The years are hidden.
Nice video
Wtf? We have seen this episode months back!
Key technologies for space exploration:
20th century: duct tape and pencil
21st century: canned air
0:48 I believe this would be easier with a 3D mouse such as those made by 3Dconnexion. That way you would only have one thing to control the vehicle with.
8:45 I do see one such device here.
Nope. You can't properly control 2 independent axles sufficiently well with a Space Navigator.
I own one, and can assure you of this fact.
Also, joysticks and such things are the worst possible controllers for a wheeled vehicle. But you are unaware of this basic fact.
That is why the wonderful "steering wheel" was invented.
Robots=Boston Dynamics
5:33 hygeine😊
This is a repost
or, about 60 days using ion thrusters--they don't need Hohmann orbits.
17:55 .... Hey Nasa ..... Boston Dynamics have seen your robot and think it's cute ... but kinda basic 😉
I thought the same thing, the Boston Dynamics robots look as if they could run rings around the NASA robot.
@@GManWrites BD could have one Atlas running rings around the Nasa bot whilst another Atlas does backflips over both of them 😂🤣
Not going to the moon or Mars with bezos suing everyone, the crybaby doesn’t like to be left out even with his x4 costs…
I couldn't think of anything worse than being part of Bezos's expedition to Mars. Taking into consideration the experiences of his Amazon staff: you'd be overworked, underpaid, forced to pee in bottles, and occasionally thumped by a robot. He'd be out that airlock in the first week.
@@debbiehenri345 he’d be strapped to the inner cone of the rockets at lift off!
From their strange interest in colonizing the moon, you'd swear that this species must have destroyed their own habitat.
we either become multiplanetary or we perish with the earth. Also something like this is best started early so we can make mistakes and improve before its too late
Earth is definitely FLAT..
"We went to the moon but that technology got destroyed and it's difficult to build it back up" and the people laugh at their empty wallet
The lunar surface is strewn with rocks. Some large. NASA needs a bulldozer or something to get around the rocks.
They should choose submariners, They are used to it
Ask asimo !🤖🙂
Musk is an engineer, Bezos a shopkeeper. At least Branson seems to be enjoying his wealth.
Kemey alenado
If it was left to Jeff Bezos would be another 50 years to get anywhere.
Great work guys .... but you were a bit late . That vehicle with the bubble and a passenger can step into a spacesuit has been around for years.
it's NASA not Nasa...
Robotic companies are way ahead of NASA... Come on guy's, put your heads together and keep your pride aside... Otherwise, it will take 40-50 years, like it already has...
The moon was never going to be part of the British empire, these no one living there to give it back to once we are done with it.😂😂😂😂🇬🇧🙏🏻
That's wry.
someone needs to feed the blonde
Among us 🤣🤙
Dr.desouza Rajeev------------
BBC++---4d, print
Transparent/invisible/ghost-/plasma/hot-cold+--/via, infra-ultra/--------robotics/vehicles.NASA-layers/tiers------
Give me the money and I will tell you that God said it's not good for man to be alone....during creation
🌳🌱🌱🌳sir i m invent Tree sensorable power acceptor Ai quantum India. This power acceptor Ai More update OUR new type Google quantum computer
has the elon done an infa red finished tesla..
That Valkyrie robot is sooo rubbish Compared to the one at Boston Scientific.
Jeff Bezos who is it?
Overall the other minutiae on here is going to be useless. We won’t be shooting the moon anytime soon either. Big dreams without Oil. I don’t see it happening.
Hi 🙂, take a look to my recent drawing about Boston Dynamics humanoid. Hope to see you around 😉.
I dont understand one thing, we still live with covid and why not do some homework and prioritise real world problems instead of stepping foot and possibly spreading Covid to Martians. Such an ignorant world we live in.
Plenty of amazing technologies have come out of Nasa and similar groups. As long as humans exist, this world will have problems. We can have temporary fixes like feeding people, or permanent fixes like advancing technology.
buying gf
its a bit weird when NASA couldnt "land" on the moon again.
maybe in the 60s, no other country can use the sattelite to see the U S is setting a Moon atmosphere in MOJAVE desert.
Hope you enjoy going to NASA on my TV Licence fee hard earn money
I understand what you are saying, but keep in mind, if it was here or not, your fee would not change.
@@rcisneros8567 thanks for reply back , the poor would never get a chance to visit NASA , and I wish BBC understand that when producing this amazing show .