I tried to game on Intels UHD 770 Graphics… It’s not good.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- Since having the Intel Core i7 12700K within our test rig, I have wanted to see how good the UHD 770 integrated graphics are when it comes to gaming. Have Intel improved their iGPUs enough to game yet? Let’s find out.
Featured Products on Amazon
- Intel Core i7-12700K: amzn.to/454D6gF
#TechLabUK #PCGaming #IntelUHD770
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @techlabuk
Visit the Website
techlab.tobias...
Follow Us
Instagram: / techlab_uk
Twitter: / techlab_uk
Facebook: / techlab.tf
Twitch: / techlabuk
Join the Community
Discord: / discord
Steam: steamcommunity...
Support Us
Amazon Wishlist: www.amazon.co....
Amazon Affiliate: amzn.to/3GSs29y
OverclockersUK Affiliate: tidd.ly/3B23tGs
CDKeys Affiliate: www.cdkeys.com/...
Fanatical Affiliate: www.fanatical.com?ref=techlabuk
![MISSING: SLIM SHADY [Expanded Mourner’s Edition Trailer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xh8qgHrOO1g/mqdefault.jpg)
32 fps in Red Dead Redemption is unplayable? It is a ridiculous statement. "Universally, 24fps is accepted as the norm for a “cinematic” frame rate. 30fps is accepted for broadcast in North America, and 25fps is the broadcast standard in Europe."
the problem isn't necessarily the framerate, but in games the frametime varies a lot, so even if you gain 32 fps one frame might last 10% longer than another one, that feels EXTREMELY laggy
then still anything under 60fps doesn't really feel good at all in games, because once again frametimes are the biggest culprit, better to have more framerate than your display can show as otherwise even 130 fps on a 144Hz screen can feel like shit but completely fine on a 60Hz screen, and 60Hz screens looks blurry in motion in high action games
might be good enough for racing games but when you aim with a mouse it's a big nah
older 30fps playstations (so up to the PS4) feel completely unplayable to me, i get nausea in like 20 mins or less in the case of those
I don't know why we, humans, are so susceptible to frametime differences, if we see a constant stream it looks sorta smooth even if it only changes 30 times a sec, but if there's even the slightest difference, literal milliseconds between frames, it feels unsmooth and laggy
Anything that is in last gen consoles also have a really smooth frametime on Intel IGPU, I don't know what's happening in newer tittles but a lot of them have really bad optimization.
lock the game to 24fps @@BH4x0r
why are you talking about movies and broadcast television
watching 30 fps and 24 fps and playing 30 fps and 24 fps is different
The UHD iGPU definelty isn't the best for gaming lol. But when I was shopping for my 13700K, I specifically wanted it. Because of the iGPU, I can use Intel QuickSync encoding and decoding in Premiere Pro along with CUDA acceleration, improving my workflow. Great video as always mate!
For GPUs designed to just be able to output pictures/slideshows/videos and webpages at 4K, Intel’s desktop iGPUs have come a long way.
The fact that you can even open modern 3D games on them at all now is surprising, let alone play some at 30fps.
And they are blessing to have in a high end gaming rig if your GPU dies or needs troubleshooting. This is really there most common use case.
yep for gaming it´s not good but really appreciated by creators but i will use that also for my second monitor (youtube,web etc) and thank you for this test! really interesting and actually it surprised me
Surprised me too although the last iGPU from intel I tested was in a Celeron lol
The speed of this CPU, the Integrated graphics is more than enough if you do mainly music production on one screen or play football manager type games.
The CPU side of things is crazy fast. So glad we upgraded the testing rig with it.
I recommend using FSR and XeSS where available instead of lowering resolution to 720. Could have run at even lower internal resolution, and it would have still looked as good or better than native 720.
Great shout out. have you done any testing around that? might be worth us giving it ago in a future video?
@@TechLabUK No for UHD. Yes for Ryzen 5700G. I leave the resolution at 1080, but use FSR. If I try the same game at 720, it subjectively looks worse than 720 upscaled with FSR.
BTW, I got in on the Intel ARC A750 LE for $199.99 at Newegg here in the U.S. last week. Still testing old games to see what will work without having to add the latest DXVK DLLs. But I will definitely be testing XeSS in Cyberpunk this weekend.
Also: Big thanks for all the testing and info you have provided on ARC. 🏅
Thanks for the video. At least it would allow you to work or watch content or basic games if your GPU went down. If it was cheaper than the other 12700k then I'd take it
It is great for those times. What do you mean the "other" 12700k?
I find it quite geeky that people who review so many PC components cry about how bad a UHD is when the 770 for what it is is quite impressive. To be able to play AAA games in 2024 with not graphics card at 1080p even if its on the lowest is amazing. Doubt people who've been spoiled with high end GPU'S and CPU'S will understand. UHD's are starting to get better than some popular low end gpu's from the past.
For playing some of the most demanding titles avaliable getting around 20 fps isn't that bad.
I mean the scenario where you skip buying a gpu you would probably not play those games anyway. So you could be fine with other simpler games.
why do you even bother with high quality or even 1080p with an intel igpu?
what about 3ds max , blender , autocad, staad pro? can i use these software to uhd 770 since I'm planning to buy i3 13500 ?
btw nice video
No idea about their performance. I generally only look at how well things can game.
Intel UHD graphics may be terrible, but they're not bad if you adjust your expectations
I played some recent double A releases on the laptop UHD 520 on an i3-6006u, running both single channel and dual channel 2400mhz ddr4. It actually managed to run many modern games and almost all old games on modest to impressive settings.
Cheers for the video!
I wouldn't expect it to game at all. That CPU is what ppl want. Add just about any GPU and you can game better than the igpu can offer. Thanks for the video.
The CPU is amazing. Just fun seeing what the iGPUs can do as we don’t have many through.
on paper this thing should blow my pc out of the water but in practice its not as good as my old laptop?
Black Mesa uses the source engine too still looks great 👍
Black mesa tends to be a little more demanding but would make a good test. Have you tested it with an iGPU?
@@TechLabUK No but I thought the engine is heavy on cpu usage relative to modern titles so it should be good with a weak gpu. It's incredible I still think for example counter strike source is better than csgo.
I manage to play maxpayne 3 on ultra(AA off) at 65fps at 1080p
Obviously, this is not good for games, but for an integrated graphics card, it performs very well, allowing it to play a large number of not-so-current games, and the current ones, although with low performance, it runs them.
what RAM setup you use? 4gb x 2 or 8gb x 2? 4gb x 2 now kind of obsolete for iGPU and APU. with 16gb rRAM you can play probably only up to 900p-720p but its can run some game even in high settings for some indie title, my Athlon 3000g get some boost when I change from 4gb x 2 to 8gb x 2, there some game eat my RAM up to 4gb.
16GB (2x8GB)
Nice video! Would that cpu and its integrated graphics be enough to stream (without gaming on it)?
I can't see why not, never tried it but Intel iGPUs are supposed to be good at encoding and streaming apparently.
So basically integrated graphics is equal to console settings, not totally unplayable
Even the 770 UHD cant handle some Roblox games like Titanic SOS lmao
I have a question for doing the content editing do we need a Graphic card, I am planning to build a new desktop computer for content creation. Please guide.
If you mean editing and exporting videos then no, you don't "need" an external graphics card as you can simply encode on the CPU but generally people do use GPUs because it's faster encoding. Supposedly.
Well I have an RTX 4080 and this the UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is a mobile GPU. It works fine for office related things and light gaming. The CPU sux and has a near 100% fail rate.
How does it handle sims 4?
So is it safe to say that, games from 2015 or below can be playable at 1080p high/medium...?
Old game will most likely be fine.
What about the original witcher 3 2015 version..
Is it possible to get 30FPS at 1080p medium..?
I actually have a 13500..
**Intel i5 13500 with uhd 770
Now i have a new problem with UHD 770, DX9 textures are working poorly, sometimes the game crashes, do you have a solution..?
There's no error codes it runs, but it runs worst..!
they make external hard drives.. why not external graphics cards?
They do, they are called eGPUs and you can build them yourself as we have done on the channel before.
@@TechLabUK oh wow.. lol.. just another thing i independantly invented in my mind and then find out other people have actually invented in reality.. i like to think that when i say this that someone went back in time and made it happen before i said it.. probably actually how it works too btw.. lol.. so then im like that was fast wow lol.. what egpu would you put on this system to play any gam in ultra in 2055? thats the year im writing this comment from..
Don't know until you try it
True. Could play Half-Life 2 on it fine so if ever in a jam it's got your back :D
I dont need it for ggaming, I need it for an office to connect somme monitors on it, pass data use excel maybe somme programs, Will tthe Core i9 12900K with the UHT 700 work for this? If so which Motherboard can I use for it, I dont want a super expesnive one but neither a cheap one that wont work. Hope someone can help with this, I am not good on builds.
The built in graphics will work for that workload fine and should support up to 4 monitors if you wanted but finding a motherboard with that many display outputs may be an issue. Any motherboard will work fine but I would be looking at a B660 and up.
@@TechLabUK yeah will use a tool which I forgot it's name lol. But after research got the MSI pro z690 A for ddr5
@@kevinnovak9440 A Z690 will do the trick. I find MSI board very good too.
@@TechLabUK so there was some issues with ddeliveries and made changes, what do you think of the MSI B760 Gaming Plus?
@@kevinnovak9440 I would buy one, I generally use the Gaming Plus boards in my main rig and never had an issue.
gt730 kille her
not very good is it
Not great but good enough for some, although you wouldn't want to spend the money on a 12700K just to game with the iGPU lol
@@TechLabUKwell 😳
@@TechLabUK no, but if you want the CPU performance with the benefit of being able to run most games, then it is at the point of being more than adequate imo
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣amd fan
3184 Sophie Ferry