Hello I am Sinti from Germany means a direct descendent of the Rai and later Chach Dynasty. Sindh has always been royal. Since Alexander the great or the vedic Texts of Jains and Hindus also mentioned Sindhi Royals before the Arabs. I am happy that the Chachnamah exists, so we have something in the hand ✋🏽. Sindh was also Multiple Times conquered. Sindh alwaYs existed. Chachnamah is a good book to work with.
I am Meghwal from Mirpur khas, Sindh. My grandfather moved to India during partition. Most of our people (Meghwal Hindus) left behind were brutally murdered by muslims.
@Red-mn9bh I agree. My ancestors were cotton farmers and weavers as far as I know. We spoke Gujarati but our dialect was different (now it’s lost). I believe there are still people who speak our language. Although much of the city is Urdu and sasta Arabic.
The Lippi in which Sindhi was written is Hatwanki and Lohanki which was replaced by Arabic Lippi and the original script was demolished so is the history and dowry story is also correct Deval kot was given to the princess. Nemruz king gave away the land Bach to Rai dynasty is also true
Basically Arora is a city of Arora Khatris whose founder was their king Suryavanshi Kshatriya Maharaj Arut who was great grandson of Lav, son of Shri Ram. Chach Raja who was minister of Arora Khatri king. He defeated Arora king by deceit and became king. He was from Brahmin family. This Brahmin king took away Kshatriya power of Arora Khatris. And king Dahir was son of Chach.
@@Kreatorisbackyt Anpad admi have you read the original Historical Document of that Era named Chachnama. To all Castiests, obsessed with proving Rai King as their. I would suggest them to read the Book "Chachnama Retold " by Gobind Khushalani in which its clearly mentioned that Rai King was a Lohana. And Lohana community is neither related to Rajputs , Jats or Rors. They are related to Arora Khatris who are the Kshatriyas of Aror Capital of Sindh
Kunindas were himachali kanets , and khas are Pahadi people we just start calling ourselves brahmin and in modern time rajputs And most funny thing is most people say we come from rajasthan which is a hoax
@@rishavkumar1250 buddy we don't get any quota only few tribal people of uk get quota We are general mostly some shilpkar get sc quota but they don't get jobs because of outsiders who make fake sc certificate
Interesting you mentioned Nimruz, I recall it from my father's camera roll. After his retirement from Navy he got a job in Indian mission in Kandahar, he worked under defence attache there. He liked to travel and he went around Afg, he made very good friends in Nimruz. Sadly this area is very backward and became a smuggling hub
@@devyanilimaye8560 umarkot is a part of Sindh,which is Muslim majority,so it can't.And by that logic,several Muslim majority places in India belong to Pakistan.
4:44 isnt dowry a foreign concept? Did it come from Zoroastrian tradition or Islamic tradition? Or both? Or did Al Tabari assume it was dowry due to his arab-centrism?
Dowry was present in virtually all civilization of the world. So it cant be foreign. The curtent financial capital of India (Mumbai) was itself a dowry
Recently I saw this podcast about chronological blunder that happened with Mauryan & Gupta history where the guest claimed Guptas existed around 300 BC and Mauryans ruled the subcontinent around 1000 BC. Although it might sound unusual, it’s essential to address the widespread misunderstandings about how timelines are calculated.
its based on accepting the chinese claims of birth of buddha. rejecting the claims on indian and sinhalaese canon. guptas themselves used a calendar that started in 319 CE. also, there was a gradual progress of brahmi from mauryans to kushanas to guptas. gupta calendar was used by odia kings until the invasion of shasanka. how do you explain harshvardhan whose gradfather married a gupta princess? ashoka made greek inscription in kandahar. Read "Date of the Buddha" by Karam Tej Sarao.
Actually, western historians connect the Greek Sandrocottus and Indian Chandragupta maurya as the same person, fitting later dynasties accordingly. The popular theory is that right after 326 BC, Sandrocottus became the king of Magadha. But this Sandrocottus might have been a different Chandragupta or even Samudragupta, not necessarily the Maurya one. Greek sources mention that Sandrocottus took his army of 600,000 people and roamed around India, conquering vast parts of lands. This description fits more on Samudragupta, as he was known to the undefeated general. Meanwhile Maurya didn't really need to roam around with a vast army and unify land as he obtained an already unified kingdom from Dhananand. Another point is that Greek texts of 326BC do not mention Chanakya at all, meanwhile indian Puranas don't mention Porus or Purushottam at all. So there could have been a mix up between Sandrocottus, Samudragupta and Chandragupta Maurya. Which will move the history of Mauryas back by 700 years, I.e 1000 BC. Another thing is, megasthnese in Indica mentioned that he saw the dynastic lineage of magadha kings going back to some 3100 years. So it is not unlikely that there were already Maurya like kingdoms in the Gangetic-Sindhu plains. I'm a casual viewer so the dates mentioned might be a little off. I'll try to provide the name and link of the said podcast.
@@Ekanth_the_01 I know which 99% people don't know. Empire name officially= KarNata,(Same for Haidava or Hindavi Samrajya, Maratha is not official name) Capital city= Vijayanagara. British wrote you simply using it blindly ... Don't reference English books for Indian History 🤣🤣
@@Ekanth_the_01 People don't know why it is Carnatic kings or Carntic music, Carnatic wars and area some times Canara district in Karnataka and Canara bank...etc... It is because Of Vijayanagara Empire... The official name of Vijayanagara empire is कर्णाट(KarNata) साम्राज्य, Vijayanagara was Capital city not the Name of Empire ... Music was patronaged by These Kings and predecessor and whole South was rule 200 years by them... It spread to both the Coastal areas.... So Carnatic Is English word for KarNata and Britishers can't spell Kannada properly as they are foreigners to our land.. Now KarNata is Karnataka State and Canara is Kannada...
@@AshokJoshi-g5n not russia, it's western steppe And not all brahmins some brahmins are mixed with local population and sometime local people became brahmins
Your narrative has greatly improved and i am almost hooked to your channel.Keep doing this good work. Be careful to avoid Hindutwa Sanghi as well as extreme leftist narratives.Thank you.
@@sahilsingh6048 we have every right to love and praise our native heros like Raja Dahir, Ranjeet Singh, Hari Sing nalwa, Hemo kalani, bhagat Singh or Raja porus
Hello bhaiya i think my question is irrelevant but If it's possible to give you an answer I shall be highly thankful to you. I started upsc & my optional subject is history, my graduation in management so are you suggest optional history Book i shall be highly thankful to you
Hi Jay... Huge admirer of your work. Your videos are peek in the history books. One suggestion, if you can add pictorial representation and images, to depict the relations between the figures, the videos would be far more engaging and better follow.
Chuch became the ruler of Sindh through a palace intrigue that was hatched by a wanton queen along with her paramour Church.They poisoned the king. It was only Agham Lohana who resisted against the rise of a usurpor,Agham sacrificed his soul to keep intact his honour and prestige.
Deleting all the comments mentioning Punjabi khatris Lohanas Arora and Arain Jats... They were Rais of Sindh and Punjab. They do the same with the glorious history of South Indians as well. Because they believe that chattri keval Rajput...
*_Yep, during the reign of Shahanshah "Hormizd IV," a Parthian sardar named "Bahram Chobin" from the House of Mihran rebelled against the ruling House of Sasan, reached all the way to the capital Tisphan (Ctesiphon), and declared himself Shahanshah of the very short-lived 2nd Parthian Empire, aka the Mihranid dynasty, but Khosrow II Parvez regained the throne in 591 CE with the help of the Byzantine Emperor "Maurice."_*
@@ajaynain88 for instance, King of chithor mentioned Chach that Rai was his brother (cousin) and its the fact that Kings of Chithor were Rajputs, hence Rai dynasty was also Rajput...but Chach were probably Brahmins.
I m a Muslim, from Pakistan. Many of learned , sindhis , love n support Raja Dahir, may Allow bless him. All the stories about Muhammad bin Qasim are rubbish. Raja gave shelter to Abdullah shah Ghazi , who with his family left Arab mainland, ( he was from the house of prophet 6th generation) due to the oppression, which started on prophet 's family just after his death.
@@bilalkhan77553 Ever read any book? You won't be saying this. The Arab records tells us about these nomad balochs in 9th century living in eastern Iran, they were forced to leave Iran by Persian and turk rulers because of their stealing and robbing the caravans in between, these nomads then entered in Sindh through makran, even their for they lived in gidans and caves for so many years, till today alot of them r living in caves, isolated from the world.
I've heard claims that there are are some Pathans in the region of Pakistan, and the claims are that they are children of a Hindu king Bappa Rawal with 1000 Arab women, my question is is it true? How is it possible that he could impregnate 1000 women? And why would he? Are there in evidences that suggest that those Pathans are his descendents?
The Lippi in which Sindhi was written is Hatwanki and Lohanki ( similar to Punjabi, brahmi based ) which was replaced by Arabic Lippi and the original script was demolished so is the history and dowry story is also correct Deval kot was given to the princess. Nemruz king gave away the land Bach to Rai dynasty is also true
@@chittodnaresh9568 so the native scripts and writings were destroyed so we can only rely on foreign ones ...... such sad turn of events for such a rich land I always thought why there was so little of evidences and writings on sindh you cleared it thanks 🙏🙌
@@John_O_Connorindian muslims or foreigners who visited the land from Arab ,china, Greek most of our sources are from them which is also very vague considering we only get to see this with their pov.
Its clearly mentioned in Chachnama that Rulers of Rai Dynasty were Lohanas yet you didnt uttered a word while metioning their origins. And very cleverly tried to indirectly link to Rajputs. Ita true that Ruler of Chittod named Maharat was brother of Rai King but that was because Lohanas were ruling till Chittod that time. And its quite possbile that Bappa Rawal who captured Chhitod from Mori Rajputs 100 years after this incident was also from Lohana clan
Sorry to say sir but I think that you haven't listened his previous videos yet , because jai has confirmed that prakrit could be more older than classical Sanskrit in which most of the puranas and epics are written but whether it is older than Vedic Sanskrit of rig veda is still a matter of debate , so he came to a conclusion and said that maybe both the languages must have coexisted at same period or Vedic could be older but they both are originated from a single ancestral language .
Arabs have never conquered India. They have not ventured even as far as Iran. Iran has been a strong defence against the Arabs through the centuries. Bharat has been attacked by either Mongols (whom we mistakenly call Mogul) or Afghans like Ghori and Ghazni. Please don't mislead students who may be viewing this channel. By the way, the history of Sindh is documented for over 7 centuries in our Puranas.
then I guess Muhammad bin Qasim was a Mongol. And have you read a book like, ever? What do you mean the Arabs didn't conquer Iran? We live in the age of the internet, how do you not know such basic knowledge?
@@m.aryaanamiri2755 Interesting point. Other than Chachnama, can you please quote authentic Indian or Arab references to his invasion? Wikipedia or WhatsApp videos don't qualify for academic literature. Please quote original books, manuscripts or academic papers from reliable historians, Arab preferably
@@NarendraKv why would you want another source when 1 source says it happened without any contemporary,Indian or Arab saying that it is wrong?Do you realize how stupid that sounds?Why would several writers write entire books about the conquests of a single province when the Umayyad caliphate was already huge?That's like me saying prove to me Hindu gods exist without using Hindu scriptures.
@@m.aryaanamiri2755 jab answer na ho toh comments me aisi hi gapp mari jati hai..chachnama koi contemporary evidence nahi hai,8ce me Qasim aaya aur likha gaya 13th ce me toh use contemporary evidence nahi kaha jata,bin Qasim ki story bas ek gapp hai..famous American historian will Durant ne bhi jab india ki history likhi toh bin Qasim ke bare me nahi likha kyunki wo use credible history hi nahi mante the..
@@Anahita-nb7tx no historian,sindhi or anyone else told the writer of the chachnama he was wrong, so who are you going to believe, an American man, who came in the 20th century or a person much closer to the time of the conquest, without anyone objecting or producing evidence against it? And 1 historian challenging a historical document with no proof changes nothing. And even if you don't believe the chachnama, the land of Sindh holds evidence such as the renaming of brahmanabad to mansura.Besides, it is hard to respect any historical opinion held by an Indian, when your "intellectuals" propagate things such as the vikramaditya empire and the idea that alexander lost to porus, despite the fact that alexander fought porus at jhelum, and advanced to the beas river before his troops rebelled. Atleast we acknowledge that our so called intellectuals produce propoganda rather than blindly believing it.
Why so low views and subscribes i am watching your channel since 1 year but very disappoint by this so less appreciation ...you give very brilliant knowledge to us ..but people not watch this type of content, they only want to see """semi nude girls """ roasters who give only slangs they get views in million..
😊Sindh was never part of bharat!...... Sindh is Sindh..... Sindh has unique identity in history of world, There was only SINDH and name of Hind also drived from SINDH! Being a son of soil and proud Sindhi, We are so much proud on our Great King Raja Dahir but he was never fought war for bharat... Proud to be Sindhi
Brother,please make video in hindi for more hindi audience,i'm comfortable in emglish but i'm more comfortable in hindi,i know you doing Phd but please make it in hindi for better understanding ❤️❤️
Hinduism is older than Buddhism. This is not controversial. Only neo Buddhists have a problem with this because they believe th at indus valley was Buddhist... Buddhist texts are filled with debates with Brahmins and about vedas...
Lekin Sindhi lok the KAUN? Kaun the voh log, "sindhi" hone se pahele? Who were their ancestors? Basha aur dharam, unke, kaise aayein, Sindh mein? Are they the same people as the Harrapans? Kin log ke saath Sindh log ne karobaar kiya hai? What were their travel / migration patterns? Why are they known as great businessmen and money minded? Are they descendents of Indo-Sycthians (Sakas)? Andronovos? BMAC descendants? Islam ne kaise Raj kiya? What were their relations with the Rajputs, and the Mughals? Were they mercenaries in the Medians, Sassanians, and Achemenid empire? In Darius's empire? Modern history ke mutabiq kya kehlate hai Sindh log ke baarein mein? Why it went to Pakistan? What was it's relationship with Kalat (Balochistan)? It's a great vid you've made, but you need more special effects, and more pertinently, more answers to these types of questions.
@@John_O_Connorbut Pakistan was part of India once. Till partition there was mixer of Hindu Muslim population there. Even to day you find many Hindus in that region. Pl mind it
@@John_O_Connor A people is defined by its customs, cultural practices, language, attire, beliefs (religion among them), region, ancestry (genetics and history). One CANNOT, i stress CANNOT define a peoples simply by religion. A people today defined as “Sindhi” are referred to as such because many of the markers so mentioned above, put them in that category. One can subcategorize them further into “Lasi” (as those “Sindhis” from Lasbela district of Balochistan province), or by caste (tribe, if you will) such as Bhatia or Rajput. Still one define a Sindhi by most of the community traits, language and dialect CHIEFLY among them. But the other FUNDAMENTAL POINT, to which I was alluding to in my FIRST message, was that before the advent of a Sindhi Muslim or Sindhi Hindu (both of which can reside on EITHER side of the modern Indo-Pak political border), is the question of WHO were the “Sindhis” BEFORE they were so termed as such. Sindhi is a LANGUAGE as much as it is a community, NOT bound by a political border but my a language, customs, and common history. It’s the ANCESTRY, which I am speaking of. If we simply go with religion, then that is an absolutely terrible metaphor and cultural assassination of a community which existed well before modern syncretic Hindu beliefs, and certainly WELL ahead of Muhammad and his followers from the 7th century AD. We probably have to break down a community by language and when Sindhi first appeared as a language. That it came from a Prakrit, has been documented. It did not just “pop up” in the 9th century AD from Perso-Arabic influences. But who were the people who spoke the early Prakrit predecessor language to Sindhi? Are they more closely related ancestral to the invading Andronovos or the BMAC migrants? Are they more related to the early Harappans? More work has to be done to define this community rather than based upon historical events or modern religious beliefs. Language is a GOOD start.
@@milanmadhani323generally there are three groups of Sindh people sometimes four, one are somewhat direct descendants of Indus people like Mohana people, others are probably aryans, like brahims, jats, Rajputs, many dalits are probably also direct descendants of Indus valley people, but it's hard to exactly pinpoint.
There was a invasion of Arabs in Sindh. There was no Arab conquest. Indians provide all wrong information based on biased Muslim data. Arabs were thrown out by Son of Raja Dahir within 25 years and there was no Muslim rule for next 400 rule till Turks came.
@@John_O_Connoryou look Christian by name. May be converted to Islam. Muslim sind? Where did you get this. It was ruled by King Jayadrada 5000 years ago. He was Sind king, even before Christ or Mohammed were born. Both Gandhara (Afghan)) and sind are very close to each other.
The kashmiri hindu kings decision to cede kashmir to india was to protect the original hindus temples language and literary heritage of kashmiri royal lineage and and to protect the forcefully converted muslims and mughals from unsecular and intolerant islam cult not in resonance with democratic tradition s. But in the process of appeasing the islamically inclined politicians the hindus of sind and gandhar was not focussed. The same condition of sindhis would have resulted to kashmiri hindus and muslims and they would not have seen the light of democracy had kashmiris were not protected. Hope the true indian muslims understand the underlaying Nature of indian culture rather than being dubbed kakafirs or secondary citizens by pak islamic biassed govt.
Indus valley civilization isn't Pakistani it's a hindu civilization go cry elsewhere your country is literally called Islamic republic why you wanna associate with hindu history your name it's even a century olde bada aaya civilization claim karne
Bro haryana ki history ke upar bhi ek bana do Indus-saraswati civilization and Vedic civilization started in haryana Oldest and biggest indus-saraswati civilization sites bhirana and rakhighari are in haryana Vedas were written and codified in haryana Indian culture and sanatan dharm originated in haryana Homeland of Aryans Considered as aryavart and bharat before india itself Puru clan first clan of india Bharta dynasty first dynasty also sole winner of battle of ten kings Kuru empire first empire and biggest indian empire to ever exsist Yaudheya republic (military republic) considered as heros among kashtriyas Harshvardhan empire last ancient Empire of north india Tomar dynasty established delhi and last natives to rule delhi Hemu vikramaditya the last hindu King to rule delhi Please bro bana de
Bhai Ancient Indian republic aur Harshavardhana, dono pr bnayi h videos. ruclips.net/video/O4YhgFHf6co/видео.html&ab_channel=JayVardhanSingh ruclips.net/video/E_iXKEiyH4M/видео.html&ab_channel=JayVardhanSingh
@@JayVardhanSingh par agr aap specifically haryana ki history ke liye video bana dete to bohot madad hoti Haryana ki history sabse underrated history h Logo ko ye lagta h ki haryana ki Punjab se pehle koi identity nhi thi Agr apne video banai to kam se kam logo ko sacchai ka pata chalega Maine Jo points diye h unme se shayad apke kaam kuch aajaye
@@John_O_Connor mr Sherlock no one one evr called it indus or sindh valley civilisation before British We don't know what the people of this civilization called themselves It was started from Haryana majority of its site were located on sarswati river Majority of its sites are in india It's oldest site is in haryana India It's biggest site is in haryana India It's nothing pakistani even in past we civilised your ancestors who later got converted in 8th century ad You have no ownership over this civilization you bloody rape product
Correction at 11:44 - Umar was the Second Caliph, not the third.
Subscribed ❤
Hello I am Sinti from Germany means a direct descendent of the Rai and later Chach Dynasty. Sindh has always been royal. Since Alexander the great or the vedic Texts of Jains and Hindus also mentioned Sindhi Royals before the Arabs. I am happy that the Chachnamah exists, so we have something in the hand ✋🏽. Sindh was also Multiple Times conquered. Sindh alwaYs existed. Chachnamah is a good book to work with.
Just curious, How you guys ended up in Germany? Are you guys Hindu or please tell us something regarding Sindhis , curious to know, Thank You 🙏
😂😅 what a good joke?????)😅
@@kartikshiroya2270 You know zero about Sinti a big part of indian History ha meri qismat
Plz educate urself about Sinti
Oh Sinti and Roma are similar
I am Meghwal from Mirpur khas, Sindh. My grandfather moved to India during partition.
Most of our people (Meghwal Hindus) left behind were brutally murdered by muslims.
@Red-mn9bh I agree. My ancestors were cotton farmers and weavers as far as I know. We spoke Gujarati but our dialect was different (now it’s lost).
I believe there are still people who speak our language. Although much of the city is Urdu and sasta Arabic.
@Red-mn9bh is this why there are so many Muslim rajputs are in Pakistan?
No sindhi hindus were killed
Your rich baniya ancestors left while low caste sindhi hindu stil living in Pakistan
@@eden55272 I agree. The so called “Low caste Hindus” have became victim of desert cult.
Islamic invasion has been bad luck for Sindh and Sindhis. It's clear that Sindhis have always resisted the invaders and never welcomed them
Whats meaning. And history of your surname?
The Lippi in which Sindhi was written is Hatwanki and Lohanki which was replaced by Arabic Lippi and the original script was demolished so is the history and dowry story is also correct Deval kot was given to the princess. Nemruz king gave away the land Bach to Rai dynasty is also true
Please make a video on the dresses and protection worn by Indian soldiers during different time periods.
Hmmm
What about King Rudrayan (wife Queen Prabahvathi) and his son King Sinhakeshari of Sindh mentioned in Divyavadhana and Jain text ?
Basically Arora is a city of Arora Khatris whose founder was their king Suryavanshi Kshatriya Maharaj Arut who was great grandson of Lav, son of Shri Ram. Chach Raja who was minister of Arora Khatri king. He defeated Arora king by deceit and became king. He was from Brahmin family. This Brahmin king took away Kshatriya power of Arora Khatris. And king Dahir was son of Chach.
He is deleting comments mentioning Punjabi khatris Lohanas Aroras jats and Arains
There is no aroot king in history and aroras are dukandar people
@@Kreatorisbackyt Anpad admi have you read the original Historical Document of that Era named Chachnama. To all Castiests, obsessed with proving Rai King as their. I would suggest them to read the Book "Chachnama Retold " by Gobind Khushalani in which its clearly mentioned that Rai King was a Lohana. And Lohana community is neither related to Rajputs , Jats or Rors. They are related to Arora Khatris who are the Kshatriyas of Aror Capital of Sindh
Please make a video on ancient Uttarakhand (kunind, Shak, Khash etc)
Kunindas were himachali kanets , and khas are Pahadi people we just start calling ourselves brahmin and in modern time rajputs
And most funny thing is most people say we come from rajasthan which is a hoax
@@doctornightcore5262 you guys are also the only brahmins and Rajputs to get ST quota 😂
@@rishavkumar1250 buddy we don't get any quota only few tribal people of uk get quota
We are general mostly some shilpkar get sc quota but they don't get jobs because of outsiders who make fake sc certificate
Interesting you mentioned Nimruz, I recall it from my father's camera roll. After his retirement from Navy he got a job in Indian mission in Kandahar, he worked under defence attache there. He liked to travel and he went around Afg, he made very good friends in Nimruz. Sadly this area is very backward and became a smuggling hub
Sindhu State for India 🇮🇳...
Partition of Sindh between Sindhu 🇮🇳⛳ and Sindh 🇵🇰...
Haha brainwashed i*iot 😂
The partition already happened friend.
@@m.aryaanamiri2755my friend Umarkot district which is Hindu majority belongs in India
@@devyanilimaye8560 umarkot is a part of Sindh,which is Muslim majority,so it can't.And by that logic,several Muslim majority places in India belong to Pakistan.
4:44 isnt dowry a foreign concept? Did it come from Zoroastrian tradition or Islamic tradition? Or both? Or did Al Tabari assume it was dowry due to his arab-centrism?
Dowry was present in virtually all civilization of the world. So it cant be foreign. The curtent financial capital of India (Mumbai) was itself a dowry
@@The_Unknown_Smiley so why ban it?
@@cokedupnormies2651 because it's bad?💀
Just because it was present in all cultures doesn't mean it is right. What sort of question is that? 😐
I found your channel today...great work brother... going to watch all the videos..keep doing good work
The best history channel I have a come across
Recently I saw this podcast about chronological blunder that happened with Mauryan & Gupta history where the guest claimed Guptas existed around 300 BC and Mauryans ruled the subcontinent around 1000 BC.
Although it might sound unusual, it’s essential to address the widespread misunderstandings about how timelines are calculated.
False
Chutiyapa hai ignore karo
Can you send the link to the podcast please
its based on accepting the chinese claims of birth of buddha. rejecting the claims on indian and sinhalaese canon. guptas themselves used a calendar that started in 319 CE. also, there was a gradual progress of brahmi from mauryans to kushanas to guptas. gupta calendar was used by odia kings until the invasion of shasanka. how do you explain harshvardhan whose gradfather married a gupta princess? ashoka made greek inscription in kandahar.
Read "Date of the Buddha" by Karam Tej Sarao.
Actually, western historians connect the Greek Sandrocottus and Indian Chandragupta maurya as the same person, fitting later dynasties accordingly. The popular theory is that right after 326 BC, Sandrocottus became the king of Magadha. But this Sandrocottus might have been a different Chandragupta or even Samudragupta, not necessarily the Maurya one.
Greek sources mention that Sandrocottus took his army of 600,000 people and roamed around India, conquering vast parts of lands. This description fits more on Samudragupta, as he was known to the undefeated general. Meanwhile Maurya didn't really need to roam around with a vast army and unify land as he obtained an already unified kingdom from Dhananand. Another point is that Greek texts of 326BC do not mention Chanakya at all, meanwhile indian Puranas don't mention Porus or Purushottam at all. So there could have been a mix up between Sandrocottus, Samudragupta and Chandragupta Maurya. Which will move the history of Mauryas back by 700 years, I.e 1000 BC.
Another thing is, megasthnese in Indica mentioned that he saw the dynastic lineage of magadha kings going back to some 3100 years. So it is not unlikely that there were already Maurya like kingdoms in the Gangetic-Sindhu plains.
I'm a casual viewer so the dates mentioned might be a little off. I'll try to provide the name and link of the said podcast.
can you make a video on exactly how much was the extent of kuru empire according to both by scholars and by religious books
Please, Make A Video On ''Ancient Chhattisgarh''
😂😂😂 Where is it bro
😂
@@UnfollowthemYour north Indian grandmother was fucked by Arab invaders..😂😂 Therefore you don't know India.
@@sahilsingh6048When your forefather was getting r.aped in the ass by mughals, We had Kalturis and Marathas.. Saale UP-bihar ke har.ami.
Read about freemasonry and aga khan case and agents of slave owners
Please make a video on Karnata region or Karnataka too
He seem to undermine the might empires like Kadamba, Chalukya, Rastrakuta, Hoysala and Vijaynagara...
@@Ekanth_the_01first we should know there is no empire as Vijayanagara officially... Its official name is KarNata...
@@Unfollowthem If you don't know Vijaya Nagara empire then my advice is get to know about it...
@@Ekanth_the_01 I know which 99% people don't know.
Empire name officially= KarNata,(Same for Haidava or Hindavi Samrajya, Maratha is not official name)
Capital city= Vijayanagara.
British wrote you simply using it blindly ... Don't reference English books for Indian History 🤣🤣
@@Ekanth_the_01
People don't know why it is Carnatic kings or Carntic music, Carnatic wars and area some times Canara district in Karnataka and Canara bank...etc... It is because Of Vijayanagara Empire... The official name of Vijayanagara empire is कर्णाट(KarNata) साम्राज्य, Vijayanagara was Capital city not the Name of Empire ... Music was patronaged by These Kings and predecessor and whole South was rule 200 years by them... It spread to both the Coastal areas.... So Carnatic Is English word for KarNata and Britishers can't spell Kannada properly as they are foreigners to our land.. Now KarNata is Karnataka State and Canara is Kannada...
What was the homeland of the shungas ?
And what was the ancestry of pushyamitra ?
Please tell sir
Bihari brahmins
@@Ayush97772 they were aryans who come from outside
Shungas were hardcore brahmins and most probably from magadh
Can't say about exact place
All brahmins came from Russia .
@@AshokJoshi-g5n not russia, it's western steppe
And not all brahmins some brahmins are mixed with local population and sometime local people became brahmins
Your narrative has greatly improved and i am almost hooked to your channel.Keep doing this good work.
Be careful to avoid Hindutwa Sanghi as well as extreme leftist narratives.Thank you.
Wow nice analysis
The real hero of Sindh, Raja Dahir The great❤
😂😂😂
@@John_O_Connorthanks for your face reveal
@@John_O_Connor is Sajan ko kya takleef he be
@@sahilsingh6048 we have every right to love and praise our native heros like Raja Dahir, Ranjeet Singh, Hari Sing nalwa, Hemo kalani, bhagat Singh or Raja porus
@@sohailsindhi3335 yes , the above guy is an 'al-Bakistani' who isnt happy you being pakistani praising kafir Heroes.
Please make a video on Lalitaditya and Bappa Rawal
Hello bhaiya i think my question is irrelevant but If it's possible to give you an answer I shall be highly thankful to you. I started upsc & my optional subject is history, my graduation in management so are you suggest optional history Book i shall be highly thankful to you
Hi Jay... Huge admirer of your work. Your videos are peek in the history books. One suggestion, if you can add pictorial representation and images, to depict the relations between the figures, the videos would be far more engaging and better follow.
Chuch became the ruler of Sindh through a palace intrigue that was hatched by a wanton queen along with her paramour Church.They poisoned the king. It was only Agham Lohana who resisted against the rise of a usurpor,Agham sacrificed his soul to keep intact his honour and prestige.
Deleting all the comments mentioning Punjabi khatris Lohanas Arora and Arain Jats... They were Rais of Sindh and Punjab. They do the same with the glorious history of South Indians as well. Because they believe that chattri keval Rajput...
amazing video
Please consult present day Sindhi hisrorians or their writings .Lare M H panwhar has also mentioned about these wars
Please make a video about history books review and recommendations.eagerly waiting for you.
V. Knowledgeable video
Best wishes
*_Yep, during the reign of Shahanshah "Hormizd IV," a Parthian sardar named "Bahram Chobin" from the House of Mihran rebelled against the ruling House of Sasan, reached all the way to the capital Tisphan (Ctesiphon), and declared himself Shahanshah of the very short-lived 2nd Parthian Empire, aka the Mihranid dynasty, but Khosrow II Parvez regained the throne in 591 CE with the help of the Byzantine Emperor "Maurice."_*
Make a video about ancient 'Kumari Kandam'
🙏🙏🙏
Great Rai Rajput Kingdom Of Sindh | 🙏🚩
It is not a rajput kingdom
@@ajaynain88 for instance, King of chithor mentioned Chach that Rai was his brother (cousin) and its the fact that Kings of Chithor were Rajputs, hence Rai dynasty was also Rajput...but Chach were probably Brahmins.
@@stviking were these Rajputs Sindhi or where they came from?
They were described as shudras by contemporary traveler hiuen tsang
@@Tushir0001 I Don't Have Much Idea About It But Rai Rajput's Fought With Sasadin Kingdom In Afghanistan During Khusro Parwej Second | ✌️
I appreciate the knowledge but could you add some animation which makes your videos interesting
Please make a video on Turk Shahid and Hindu Shahid
“Shahi”
Turki Shahi,Hindu Shahi,Brahman Shahi
Turk shahi were Buddhist Turks, Hindu Shahis was Brahmin or kshatriya from odi near peshawar in swat valley
Turk shahi were Buddhist Turks, Hindu Shahis was Brahmin or kshatriya from odi near peshawar in swat valley
Turk shahi were Buddhist Turks, Hindu Shahis was Brahmin or kshatriya from odi near peshawar in swat valley
I m a Muslim, from Pakistan.
Many of learned , sindhis , love n support Raja Dahir, may Allow bless him.
All the stories about Muhammad bin Qasim are rubbish.
Raja gave shelter to Abdullah shah Ghazi , who with his family left Arab mainland, ( he was from the house of prophet 6th generation) due to the oppression, which started on prophet 's family just after his death.
😂😂😂
True.. Nice to know brother
❤from Agra
It is great you have not forgotten your history, you’re a Muslim probably for maybe maximum thousand years but a Sindhi for even longer.
What were the majority religion of sindh during the time of Arab invasion?
Buddhism
Buddhism
What were the local deities or main specific gods worshipped this time period when Arabs were arriving?
@@hoplite723 buddhism predominantly has prevailed in the west of sub-continent as the major most religion for centuries
Majority Religion was hindus, as sindh patronized the Hindu God Surya & Sindhi Guru Jhulelaal
Are there any oral traditions of these events that survive that can confirm these stories?
Please make a video on ancient banvasi (vaijayanti)
Jo 1000 years old likhe gye wo bhi kisi original source se likhe gyebhinge short mein? Right??
Han Esa hi hoga chahiye . Nahi to unki kya authenticity?
Sme people in India have surname "Raizada". Are they Sindhis?
No , they are sons of British Stooges or of rajput kings of hills
@@Pioneer-zx5fx You mean Ballochis
They are kashmiri brahmin
Nice
I admire Sindhi traders they're dynamic from West Indies to Singapore to HK. Most well known today's world Hindujas from Iran.
1:30
LOVE FROM KARACHI 🇵🇰♥️
Bruh they were Punjabi Khatris Arora Lohanas, Punjabi Jats and Arain..
Where was Nimru located?
persian empire ( homeland of parsis) just beside sindh. Also including present day Sistan and part of Baluchistan province of Iran .
@@chittodnaresh9568It was a balochi empire
@@bilalkhan77553there were no balochs at that time, they were hiding in caves somewhere in northwest Iran.
@@ScindianLad And they told you in your dreams
@@bilalkhan77553 Ever read any book? You won't be saying this. The Arab records tells us about these nomad balochs in 9th century living in eastern Iran, they were forced to leave Iran by Persian and turk rulers because of their stealing and robbing the caravans in between, these nomads then entered in Sindh through makran, even their for they lived in gidans and caves for so many years, till today alot of them r living in caves, isolated from the world.
Nice video
I've heard claims that there are are some Pathans in the region of Pakistan, and the claims are that they are children of a Hindu king Bappa Rawal with 1000 Arab women, my question is is it true? How is it possible that he could impregnate 1000 women? And why would he? Are there in evidences that suggest that those Pathans are his descendents?
You missed Raja Dhaj Ror kumar founder of Aror
Are there no written native source on sindh ??
The Lippi in which Sindhi was written is Hatwanki and Lohanki ( similar to Punjabi, brahmi based ) which was replaced by Arabic Lippi and the original script was demolished so is the history and dowry story is also correct Deval kot was given to the princess. Nemruz king gave away the land Bach to Rai dynasty is also true
@@chittodnaresh9568 so the native scripts and writings were destroyed so we can only rely on foreign ones ...... such sad turn of events for such a rich land I always thought why there was so little of evidences and writings on sindh you cleared it thanks 🙏🙌
In my dp
Aryan ivasion oe video banaye ?
Aryan invasion has been abandoned by scholars. Now the theory is Aryan migration.
Sir can you explain the battle of Thane 636
I will cover it in an upcoming video.
please about Kandhar now KANDAHAR
SINDH WILL BE HIND, IF ALL HINDUS UNITE AGAINST THE BARBARIC IDEOLOGY OF THE WEST.
Yeah fallacy has it's way to corrupt minds. Go get it.
Alag hi copium me h
Andhnamazi/jihadhi @trishulart-nr3ev
@trishulart-nr3ev You aren't a Maratha, you are a HARPIC BOY GAE VIM Bhikari BHIKKU
@@aagamjain1395 Tu jaake Nanga ghum, muh baandh ke
Science Journey Channel RUclips pur bhi iss Topic pur details mein kaha hai.🙏🙏
Sanatan samiksha science journey ko daily hi exposed kar deta hai..
amazing vid as always
Isn't it strange that no one in rest of India writing anything about Sindh. Means Sindh was neglected by the mainland India.
Detail writing of history in South Asia was started by Indian Muslims.
@@John_O_Connor by invader muslims..
@@John_O_Connorindian muslims or foreigners who visited the land from Arab ,china, Greek most of our sources are from them which is also very vague considering we only get to see this with their pov.
Its clearly mentioned in Chachnama that Rulers of Rai Dynasty were Lohanas yet you didnt uttered a word while metioning their origins. And very cleverly tried to indirectly link to Rajputs. Ita true that Ruler of Chittod named Maharat was brother of Rai King but that was because Lohanas were ruling till Chittod that time. And its quite possbile that Bappa Rawal who captured Chhitod from Mori Rajputs 100 years after this incident was also from Lohana clan
❤❤
You are true and unbiased historian that’s why you didn’t hesitate to say that Prakrit is older than Sanskrit ❤
Kyunki wo nahi hai..
@@Anahita-nb7tx samjha nahi mai 😳
@@Truthseeker838 sanskrit old hai prakrit nahi
what rubbish are you saying Prakrit is not even 2nd oldest in India 😂
Sorry to say sir but I think that you haven't listened his previous videos yet , because jai has confirmed that prakrit could be more older than classical Sanskrit in which most of the puranas and epics are written but whether it is older than Vedic Sanskrit of rig veda is still a matter of debate , so he came to a conclusion and said that maybe both the languages must have coexisted at same period or Vedic could be older but they both are originated from a single ancestral language .
Subscribed
Whay are u hiding that bhrahmin king dahir married his brother bai
Arabs have never conquered India. They have not ventured even as far as Iran. Iran has been a strong defence against the Arabs through the centuries.
Bharat has been attacked by either Mongols (whom we mistakenly call Mogul) or Afghans like Ghori and Ghazni.
Please don't mislead students who may be viewing this channel.
By the way, the history of Sindh is documented for over 7 centuries in our Puranas.
then I guess Muhammad bin Qasim was a Mongol. And have you read a book like, ever? What do you mean the Arabs didn't conquer Iran? We live in the age of the internet, how do you not know such basic knowledge?
@@m.aryaanamiri2755 Interesting point. Other than Chachnama, can you please quote authentic Indian or Arab references to his invasion? Wikipedia or WhatsApp videos don't qualify for academic literature. Please quote original books, manuscripts or academic papers from reliable historians, Arab preferably
@@NarendraKv why would you want another source when 1 source says it happened without any contemporary,Indian or Arab saying that it is wrong?Do you realize how stupid that sounds?Why would several writers write entire books about the conquests of a single province when the Umayyad caliphate was already huge?That's like me saying prove to me Hindu gods exist without using Hindu scriptures.
@@m.aryaanamiri2755 jab answer na ho toh comments me aisi hi gapp mari jati hai..chachnama koi contemporary evidence nahi hai,8ce me Qasim aaya aur likha gaya 13th ce me toh use contemporary evidence nahi kaha jata,bin Qasim ki story bas ek gapp hai..famous American historian will Durant ne bhi jab india ki history likhi toh bin Qasim ke bare me nahi likha kyunki wo use credible history hi nahi mante the..
@@Anahita-nb7tx no historian,sindhi or anyone else told the writer of the chachnama he was wrong, so who are you going to believe, an American man, who came in the 20th century or a person much closer to the time of the conquest, without anyone objecting or producing evidence against it? And 1 historian challenging a historical document with no proof changes nothing. And even if you don't believe the chachnama, the land of Sindh holds evidence such as the renaming of brahmanabad to mansura.Besides, it is hard to respect any historical opinion held by an Indian, when your "intellectuals" propagate things such as the vikramaditya empire and the idea that alexander lost to porus, despite the fact that alexander fought porus at jhelum, and advanced to the beas river before his troops rebelled. Atleast we acknowledge that our so called intellectuals produce propoganda rather than blindly believing it.
Why so low views and subscribes i am watching your channel since 1 year but very disappoint by this so less appreciation ...you give very brilliant knowledge to us ..but people not watch this type of content, they only want to see """semi nude girls """ roasters who give only slangs they get views in million..
Sindh is derived from the Sindhu Tribe of Jats, the first tribe that ruled the region.
😂
Illiterate, Sindh is derived from River Sindhu
@@HiddenHistoryofBharat before aryan Sindhu river was not sindhu i don't say he is 100 percent right but may be
Aapne hamara ateet ke muh pe jor ka tamacha maara hai.❤❤👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏
😊Sindh was never part of bharat!...... Sindh is Sindh..... Sindh has unique identity in history of world, There was only SINDH and name of Hind also drived from SINDH! Being a son of soil and proud Sindhi, We are so much proud on our Great King Raja Dahir but he was never fought war for bharat...
Proud to be Sindhi
Brother,please make video in hindi for more hindi audience,i'm comfortable in emglish but i'm more comfortable in hindi,i know you doing Phd but please make it in hindi for better understanding ❤️❤️
Tell us about people ,society,religion...useless to know the names of kings..harharmahadev
IS HINDUISM OLDER THAN BUDDHISM MAKE A VIDEO PLEASE IT'S VERY MUCH CONTROVERSIAL
What's controversial about it? Everyone knows that Vedas were written before Buddha's birth.
@@Progamermove_2003 I know but I want to listen from him in basis of fcats
@@justananimefan9156 And why do you want it?
@@thealphaN becuz I want it
Hinduism is older than Buddhism. This is not controversial. Only neo Buddhists have a problem with this because they believe th at indus valley was Buddhist...
Buddhist texts are filled with debates with Brahmins and about vedas...
Sahiras is more of a rendition of Cyrus 😂😂
South india before mauryan period
In any language there is no South India Existed... Do you know this??
Still mix is Vedic and paganism
South india was not really affected by mauryan empire. Cholas were quite strong.
Maurya impact was very less in South
South India was rich state now Naarth Indians have ruined our culture Saaar
Rai dynasta were decendants of maurayans and bhrahmin chah killed and establisted bhrahmin rule why are u hiding this.
Lekin Sindhi lok the KAUN? Kaun the voh log, "sindhi" hone se pahele? Who were their ancestors? Basha aur dharam, unke, kaise aayein, Sindh mein? Are they the same people as the Harrapans? Kin log ke saath Sindh log ne karobaar kiya hai? What were their travel / migration patterns? Why are they known as great businessmen and money minded? Are they descendents of Indo-Sycthians (Sakas)? Andronovos? BMAC descendants? Islam ne kaise Raj kiya? What were their relations with the Rajputs, and the Mughals? Were they mercenaries in the Medians, Sassanians, and Achemenid empire? In Darius's empire? Modern history ke mutabiq kya kehlate hai Sindh log ke baarein mein? Why it went to Pakistan? What was it's relationship with Kalat (Balochistan)? It's a great vid you've made, but you need more special effects, and more pertinently, more answers to these types of questions.
Sindh is an integral part of Pakistan because Sindhis are Muslims. Is that really that hard to understand?
@@John_O_Connorbut Pakistan was part of India once. Till partition there was mixer of Hindu Muslim population there. Even to day you find many Hindus in that region. Pl mind it
@@John_O_Connor A people is defined by its customs, cultural practices, language, attire, beliefs (religion among them), region, ancestry (genetics and history). One CANNOT, i stress CANNOT define a peoples simply by religion. A people today defined as “Sindhi” are referred to as such because many of the markers so mentioned above, put them in that category. One can subcategorize them further into “Lasi” (as those “Sindhis” from Lasbela district of Balochistan province), or by caste (tribe, if you will) such as Bhatia or Rajput. Still one define a Sindhi by most of the community traits, language and dialect CHIEFLY among them.
But the other FUNDAMENTAL POINT, to which I was alluding to in my FIRST message, was that before the advent of a Sindhi Muslim or Sindhi Hindu (both of which can reside on EITHER side of the modern Indo-Pak political border), is the question of WHO were the “Sindhis” BEFORE they were so termed as such. Sindhi is a LANGUAGE as much as it is a community, NOT bound by a political border but my a language, customs, and common history. It’s the ANCESTRY, which I am speaking of. If we simply go with religion, then that is an absolutely terrible metaphor and cultural assassination of a community which existed well before modern syncretic Hindu beliefs, and certainly WELL ahead of Muhammad and his followers from the 7th century AD.
We probably have to break down a community by language and when Sindhi first appeared as a language. That it came from a Prakrit, has been documented. It did not just “pop up” in the 9th century AD from Perso-Arabic influences. But who were the people who spoke the early Prakrit predecessor language to Sindhi? Are they more closely related ancestral to the invading Andronovos or the BMAC migrants? Are they more related to the early Harappans?
More work has to be done to define this community rather than based upon historical events or modern religious beliefs. Language is a GOOD start.
@@milanmadhani323generally there are three groups of Sindh people sometimes four, one are somewhat direct descendants of Indus people like Mohana people, others are probably aryans, like brahims, jats, Rajputs, many dalits are probably also direct descendants of Indus valley people, but it's hard to exactly pinpoint.
Punjabi khatris Arora Lohana Jats and Arain
There was a invasion of Arabs in Sindh. There was no Arab conquest. Indians provide all wrong information based on biased Muslim data. Arabs were thrown out by Son of Raja Dahir within 25 years and there was no Muslim rule for next 400 rule till Turks came.
Sindh was ruled by Sindhis after the Arab left. Muslim Sindhis.
@@John_O_Connoryou look Christian by name. May be converted to Islam. Muslim sind? Where did you get this. It was ruled by King Jayadrada 5000 years ago. He was Sind king, even before Christ or Mohammed were born. Both Gandhara (Afghan)) and sind are very close to each other.
Kanishak king afganisthan se ye bhi kamboj king the khoj karo too pta karo .
The kashmiri hindu kings decision to cede kashmir to india was to protect the original hindus temples language and literary heritage of kashmiri royal lineage and and to protect the forcefully converted muslims and mughals from unsecular and intolerant islam cult not in resonance with democratic tradition s.
But in the process of appeasing the islamically inclined politicians the hindus of sind and gandhar was not focussed. The same condition of sindhis would have resulted to kashmiri hindus and muslims and they would not have seen the light of democracy had kashmiris were not protected. Hope the true indian muslims understand the underlaying
Nature of indian culture rather than being dubbed kakafirs or secondary citizens by pak islamic biassed govt.
Was under the rulerbof Sikh. And bhoddist empire
Rai not Raya , noob😂
Now Sindh is the province of our great Islamic civilization 🇵🇰❤
Great BLUNDER to HUMANITY ☪️🤮
First foothood was in the Makran, Sindh came after. By the way, PAKISTAN ZINDABAD, the land of Sindh (Indus River) Valley Civilization ❤🇵🇰
Indus valley civilization isn't Pakistani it's a hindu civilization go cry elsewhere your country is literally called Islamic republic why you wanna associate with hindu history your name it's even a century olde bada aaya civilization claim karne
😂
Joker
Joker 😂
Audio and vedio not matching 😅
And your spelling is not correct 😂😂
@@king_halcyon childish
Sindhian😂 . Really??
Its Sindhi... brother !!!
Yes, my fault here. Should've used Sindhi.
Bro haryana ki history ke upar bhi ek bana do
Indus-saraswati civilization and Vedic civilization started in haryana
Oldest and biggest indus-saraswati civilization sites bhirana and rakhighari are in haryana
Vedas were written and codified in haryana
Indian culture and sanatan dharm originated in haryana
Homeland of Aryans
Considered as aryavart and bharat before india itself
Puru clan first clan of india
Bharta dynasty first dynasty also sole winner of battle of ten kings
Kuru empire first empire and biggest indian empire to ever exsist
Yaudheya republic (military republic) considered as heros among kashtriyas
Harshvardhan empire last ancient Empire of north india
Tomar dynasty established delhi and last natives to rule delhi
Hemu vikramaditya the last hindu King to rule delhi
Please bro bana de
Bhai Ancient Indian republic aur Harshavardhana, dono pr bnayi h videos.
ruclips.net/video/O4YhgFHf6co/видео.html&ab_channel=JayVardhanSingh
ruclips.net/video/E_iXKEiyH4M/видео.html&ab_channel=JayVardhanSingh
@@JayVardhanSingh par agr aap specifically haryana ki history ke liye video bana dete to bohot madad hoti
Haryana ki history sabse underrated history h
Logo ko ye lagta h ki haryana ki Punjab se pehle koi identity nhi thi
Agr apne video banai to kam se kam logo ko sacchai ka pata chalega
Maine Jo points diye h unme se shayad apke kaam kuch aajaye
Hariyana Stabilised By Rana Har Rai Singh | 🙏🚩
It is Sindh Valley Civilization (Indus in English). Adding a Hindu sounding name wont make it less Pakistani 😂
@@John_O_Connor mr Sherlock no one one evr called it indus or sindh valley civilisation before British
We don't know what the people of this civilization called themselves
It was started from Haryana majority of its site were located on sarswati river
Majority of its sites are in india
It's oldest site is in haryana India
It's biggest site is in haryana India
It's nothing pakistani even in past we civilised your ancestors who later got converted in 8th century ad
You have no ownership over this civilization you bloody rape product