Centre for Eastern Studies, you have great capacity for analysis. Are you in any active dialogue with structures within EU? Such analysis should be brought up on the desks of representatives
Not all those who criticize NATO and the EU are Russian bots. The true fact is you and your pro-western kind don't like to be criticized and you are genuinely hypocrite.
@salainenagentti3251 yeah... in other comment you argued that Finland totally lost Winter War, where in reality they remained natural instead of puppet state up until Russian invasion in Ukraine showed them neutrality does not work. Go cry somewhere else vatnik, you can't fool anyone about being on Russian paycheck. And talks about "keep the ideas open" fail as hard as trying to rationalise flat earth arguments
Most people in Western Europe choose ignorance and self-deceit but will get tears and sweat and blood instead. Waking up from this dream will be very painful indeed.
It's astonishing that people tend to forget that just 30-40 years ago the borders of the GDR (Russias sphere of influence) were a mere 45 kilometers from the center of Hamburg away. 1700 km of buffer space wasn't enough for Russia's insecurities.
What do you know about "most people in Western Europe"? I'd say most people on earth are tired of American hegemony. Perhaps you are the one who needs to wake up? If you bully someone long enough, eventually you will face consequences.
Excellent presentation!!! Very clear on the structural problems of Russia and its inability to deal with those problems as an Empire, other than war and paranoia!!! And of course their incessant propaganda!!
@@salainenagentti3251 OH NO! by technicality they lost... So what? Helsinki never fell, and out of all states in soviet sphere of influence they had it relatively good... still bad enough to hate Russia even more, but it took till 2022 when they realized all those neutrality guarantees mean nothing against modern Russia, till then they remained neutral since fall of Soviet Union.
@@Mr.Funnyman273 despite losing they remained a separate country, not even a satellite state of Soviet Union. What kind of victory was it for USSR? and calling it copium and calling me names... yeah, go ahead, enjoy your totalitarian rule for as long as there is no mass conscription from Moscow and St. Petersburg. After that starts... good luck, you'll need it. (PS: don't bother threatening conscription over here, as unlike what some Russians believe, no army was deployed, so there is still plenty people to defend here)
You start by omitting 20 explosions of military warehouses in Bulgaria that killed many civilians on Bulgarian soil, circa 2015 to 2018. This was a lot worse than what happened in the Czech Republic and typical Polish behavior to downplay stuff that happens around the Balkans/Romania. This is what you are missing from "how to defeat Russia" apart from the clowns that were blocking the Ukraine border. Start with yourself
A lot of Russain fan boys in here... The west is 20 years ahead of Russia in military technology. How is Russia going to stop NATO if they can't even get near Kiev..
20 years? I think it's closer to 40. We may not have the spaceships some might have expected that difference to make, but those bradleys are doing great over there.
Russia their milatary budjet 72 billion dollars! USA military budjet is 900 billion dollars! Western world have supported Ukraine 150 billion dollars military help! Russia have only 3% of world total military budjet! Great Britain attacked against Crimea already in 1853! Crimea was part of Russia in 1954! Khruchev ilegally moved Crimea part of Ukraine in 1954!
@@RaineriHakkarainen you statement is like comparing power to energy. with those 150 billion they managed to hold Russia for almost 3 years, and both sides are equally exhausted 3 * 72 = 216. think about it for a moment, if west could stop Russia with such small part of their budget, Russia has no chance against them if they cared, but they don't have such land grab ambitions like Putin does... no one wants to attack Russia, people want to trade, as that's more profitable for everyone unlike land grab wars. You second point about Crimea being part of Russian Empire also does not land to much. Before Russian Empire it was independent as a Khanate, covering just about the area Russia claims form Ukraine today + Rostov and Krasnodar regions. Those regions remained culturally and ethnically distinct from Moscow Russia for centuries, just like many other regions Russia conquered, and all the way to 1926, according to census Soviet Union had at the time, people in modern day Krasnodar considered themself over 60% Ukrainian.
no one wants to do it why would i join their war fuck them Uncle Sam made it let him send his soliders to die 😂 propaganda to drag us into a war that is not ours ukraine is not the european union and not nato member so fuck this bullshitt video
Wtf, Dont you guys advise politicians? Tell them this, that's who needs to be convinced. Most people watching this already understand & agree with this strategy. Politicians need to be step up, ignoring the problem only hurts us more. The west is heavily infected with bribed officials, politicians, & otherwise influential assholes on russias payroll. Thats the only possible explanation for our continued inaction, imo. Our use of sanctions was naive. The oil price cap is the best example. Why on earth would russia abide by our sanctions, willingly cooperating with these restrictions & sell oil at a reduced price? Due to inflated egos of western politicians, Once again it's embarrassingly delusional to think we could control the entire world & prevent russias sale of oil. The sanctions can be worked around, much like the "sanctions" or laws on drugs & guns. Despite being illegal, have we eradicated the issue? Russia operates with a street mentality, perhaps many dont recognize it. Its untrustworthy, sneaky, manipulating, and aggressive. Violence & pain is the only language they understand. They're always willing to go one step further, violence is their trump card, and we look weak with our soft, overly bureaucratic, liberal statements of condemnation. We need to understand a few things if we're to defeat russia. Sanctions add difficulty & expense, but countries can work around them. Sadly, its unrealistic to think any of the war criminals will be prosecuted, we're physically unable to do anything about it. Sanctions won't end the war, they arnt designed to bankrupt countries, just make their lives more difficult. Ramping up sanctions slowly and giving aid to ukraine slowly, provides time for russia to adjust. The west must decide to inflict defeat on russia, form a cohesive plan, give ukraine drastically more aid, & start dominating russia like they do to us. Give them problems, ultimatums, & headaches. Russia survived the war by acting tough, appearing strong, & keeping us scared. Look up russias use of reflexive control theory, its a literal mathematical formula for controlling your enemies, we know they use it, yet it still works.....
This is a channel of an analytical institute subordinate to the Polish ministry of foreign affairs. Polish government (regardless of which party is in power) is actually saying the same thing as they do, the problem is, Poland does not have the same heft as say, Germany or France to actually get its point across to all of its allies. Complacency is too alluring an option when you're not directly threatened.
13:30 "Russia would simply become a federation" - exactly what we tried in 1990. 9:50 "[Some] still say we should reach a deal, [but]" 10:30 "Russia draws imaginary red lines for us but it doesn't draw any red lines for itself." - yes, they began drawing a red line on NATO expanding east of Germany, but apparently we also only draw red lines for others and continue our expansionism. When I started writing this comment it resulted in me giving four paragraphs of detailed insight into my view on politics, so I stop on only pointing some parts out of the video, without necessarily commenting them. Although I will say - both sides play the game of geopolitics; here the means are the same on both sides, and there is only one final goal - global hegemony.
The usual Russian apologist spiel. No promise was ever made that Russia could veto the expansion of NATO; it repeatedly accepted in legally binding treaties that it acknowledged the sovereignty of its former satellite states, and a basic element of that sovereignty, denied to them under the Soviet yoke, is the right to enter or leave alliances as they choose. Knowing Russia for what it has always been, most of those states rushed to join NATO, as we see for good reason. NATO did not rush in, but rather was invited in by the sovereign states, all peaceful democracies, that wished to join it for protection against Russia. Nobody compelled them to do so, and it is exactly Russia’s inability to accept the sovereignty of neighboring countries that has driven NATO’s expansion. The problem is Russia, the solution is NATO. Dictatorships can never be granted veto power over the actions of democracies.
@@mebsreaand what if Mexico joined Russia’s purely defensive alliance? The US will lose their shit. And what if before inviting Mexico, Russia started spreading anti-US sentiments? And what about proceeding with Canada? We all know what would happen. Oh, by the way, do you know any examples of NATO defending? Because I struggle to remember. But there are examples of NATO being on the offensive. Western hypocrisy is phenomenal. Spreading terror in half of the world in the name of freedom and democracy. No wonder so many countries want to join BRICS now. They were victims for decades and nobody cared
True - but the democratic value here is that nations have the freedom to choose. You say winner takes all. I say we need to try to defy that conclusion.
@@mebsrea how about US and European democracies supporting Yeltsin who shot his Parliament from tanks because this Parliament refused to accept Yetlsin's ways of reforms which perfectly aligned with the Western vision? Funnily enough this vision very much resembles to what US was making in Latin America. Your talks on democracy is a complete and brazen lie. You guys only don't like the dictators which are not handy for you. But even if we omit this point, in 1997 there was the Founding act signed between NATO and Russia, where both sides declared they will refrain from tearing Europe into blocks and from violence. To each other AS WELL AS to the 3rd party countries. Since then happened what? Not UN backed bombardment of Yugoslavia in 1999 (!), Iraq bombing with deceiving the UN on Iraq leadership wielding biological weapon, then Lybia, Syria...and it was sorta okay for you. But when it's Russia in same Syria, Georgia or Ukraine - it makes you squeak. I won't pretend and preach I'm a moralist like you usually do, but I demand equal treatment. If you can, Russia can too. Period.
@@mebsrea You need to revisit Mearsheimers realism. Countries, powerful nations reign in their regions just like the US maintain their sea to sea security so Russia maintains Eurasia and it is the most naive fool that expects that large powerful nations would bend to little puny ones.
@@johnandrew5467 what bot? I’m Belarusian. I can’t stand this Polish masochism, watching them supporting the same ukronazis that murdered their ancestors in Wolyn. Some even shout Slava ukraini, a nazi collaborator banderite slogan
@@johnandrew5467What bot is he? Or are you just another retarded american thinking "ooga booga cyrillic letters equal russian bot". You do know that ukrainians use cyrillic letters too which means you're equating ukrainians as russians, "johnandrew"?
Do an analysis what will be left of Ukraine after this war, how it will recover from this, because it's questionable if the West will actually going to go though on massive investments in full or people returning to places that are now rubble, leaving all of their jobs in they got now in the EU. Ukraine is being depopulated and it's infrastructure being obliterated every day, the longer this lasts for, the more grim it looks for Ukraine.
Oh shush you, the West rebuilt all of Europe just fine after both world war one and world war two. Even Russia managed to glue itself back together after those conflicts. Japan became a world leader in high-end electronics. South Korea did the same. Post-war reconstruction has been done succesfully many times before in democratic countries, usually with greater prosperity as a result.
Russia will have to pay repetitions ( quite few billions were seized from Putin goons) with modern drones and satellite imaging there will be lots of evidence and every town has mass grave nearby, the amount of evidence will be huge so all that money will never going back to Russia. Russians will be dirt poor for decades
@@davidschaftenaar6530 That was a long time ago, times and interests change. Us in Serbia were betrayed by the West, so Ukraine should be careful. It would be nice having a realistic outlook analysis done, because it could be presented to potential investors. The West not only bombed us and robbed us of our most important piece of land, but also now supports a regime that is non-democratic, corrupt, criminal, cleptocratic and that does not care about our well being.
Realistically a proper Study of the consequences, should have been carried out decades ago, before NATO began its East Ward Expansion in the Mid 1990s under President WB Clinton and the USA's "Project for a New American Century" (PNAC) 1996.
It's full of nonsense. Gentleman in the black shirt says Russia wants all of Ukraine not just the Donbass, that's fear mongering designed to throw Europeans into paranoia. Ukraine is a clearly divided country like Germany, look at their voting history these 30 years of Independence. Many videos proving that eastern civilians are sympathetic to Russia like East Germany. If Kyiv wasn't so desperate to extract their resources, they'd have recognized and respected their Independence so they can be free to join NATO. But wisdom is short in Kyiv, they're learning the very, very hard way.
YT fascist mods are deleting all my detailed comments, but the only way is from inside. Majority of "insode citizens" have no balls for it. So what does it leave us with?
Waaaaiit, what do you mean by can still win? Ukraine is winning and Russia is about to run out of missiles, tanks, people and most importantly, shovels in a couple of days, right? Nice narrator though
Russia's got 1 important advantage over the West though: determination. Western leaders are more worried about their immediate electoral prospects, and so only want to make sure things stabilise quickly in the short term. Russian leaders though, plan for the long term, and are far more likely to lose their lives if they fail, and so are much more motivated to succeed.
Not really, the elections mean nothing as we can see all electable parties are NATO countries. The difference consists in the fact that for Russia Ukraine matters. For the West, Ukraine is a disposable trojan horse.
While I agree with your observation in general, I wouldn't call it an advantage though. >Immediate elctoral prospects True, one might think our politicians only think in electoral terms. But don't forget that they usually travelled a very long power-struggling road before we ordinary citizens have even heard their names. They know what it means like to plan for the long term because their personal long term goal was running for office for which they worked harder than we can possibly fathom. The difference between democracies and autocracies is that by creating an institutionalized sense of uncertainty whether you will remain in power or not, we keep decision makers in check. Abuse of power is less likely in our systems and even though it happens too, it most likely creates less damage. Just raise the number of people who could potentially fuck up and each of them will fuck up less, individually. That's long-term stability. >lose their lives if they fail/more motivated to succeed On an individual level, it might be a motivating factor to raise the stakes for failure. But honestly, I think fear sucks as a motivating factor. Especially if you fear for your own life/the lives of the ones dear to you. You will quickly find yourself limited to a binary flight vs. fight view on the world and your decisions will consider self-preservation above all, not the long term consequences for either your domain of responsibility or your country. Also, people raised in a culture of fear make terrible advisors to those in charge. If you grow up knowing that your supervisor can make your life hell, you will quickly learn it's probably best for you to just tell him what he wants to hear. And these entire generations of yes-men sucking it up to their bosses out of fear probably also told Putin that he could "take Kiyiv in just three days, trust me bro". edit: Think about Putin himself now. Do you think he is taking long-term decisions best for his country? Or is he just trying to cover his ass/remain in power? Imagine this Ukraine war thing he has going on right now doesn't end in victory but in defeat. Do you think he can just retire and receive pension for the rest of his days, yelling at the TV angrily whenever he sees his political opposition who became president after him? Don't think so. He'll more likely be hanging from a tree and God knows, he is very well aware of that too.
Could you make a video about russian culture's toxic influence? Even in Poland books that proclaim russian imperial anti-West ideas are extremely popular
I saw Putin litening Tchaikovsky competition concertos like Tchaikovsky 1-2 Prokofiev 2-3 Scriabin Rachmaninov 1-2 and Rhapsody theme Paganini! Of course Putin did go crazy thinking we are the greatest like Hitler who tough we are the greatest cultue because Bruckner Beethoven Bach Mozart!
There is no thing such as "the collective West" though. That's the beauty of democracy and pluralism, we are allowed to disagree and do so constantly. Therefore, you will find channels spreading the propaganda of your preference and are left to decide on your own which version of reality is more likely representing the "truth".
@@husseinhussein466it’s called Military AID just like Russia gets Military AID from Iran NK China this is very different from actual boots on the ground and joining in carrying out assaults surely you already know this right
The use of "We" is infuriating, when he says "we" he means Ukrainians, who are treated not like humans but as NPCs, that are expected to die for as long and as much as needed. Anyone who really wants to "defeat Russia" should heed his own words, instead of silently expecting other to do all the job. Is it unrealistic, does it mean you can't support Ukraine without being on the frontlines yourself? No, of course you can support Ukraine, but there must be an understanding that it's not "you" who is actually doing the defeating part. Ukraine, most of all, wants peace.
The more i'm listening to this dude and his entitled-ass rant - the more i start to feel that Putin actually has to do something with Poland instead of current plans to simply securing the BSF assets and land corridor to them. For starters - IMHO just a little "special attitude-adjustment operation" should probably do the trick, but who knows
When their expertise was the reason for the suggestion of little Scholz and the bacon of hope and the miracle of the century of the Foreign minister it is again as good as trash.
Huh, they must've had a large budget cut it would seem, seeing how all they have to show for their plans for defeating Russia is a 48 minute long video of some swine oinking, grunting and farting.
La Russia conosce bene la mentalità dei politici Polacchi ,secondo voi se la Russia viene attaccata ,cosa ne sarà della bella Polonia . Amici Polacchi ,questo signore e un altro ZELINSKY . Apriti gli occhi
How many deadlines has it been for this war... heck, even for Kursk area alone? Just Russia is slowly gaining land does not mean they are "winning" There is no clear winner so far, and it's obvious both sides are strained, Russia more so.
@@cola98765 So Russia taking land does not mean that its winning...got you. Does the fact that Ukranians rely on forced mobilization while Russia relies entirely on volunteers, effectively confirming that Russia has been successfully attriting ukranians also not mean that Russia is winning? Does massive desertion of up to 20% (as per most recent politico article referencing Ukranian MPs) also not mean that Russia is winning? Does the fact that Russia has adjusted to the point of near-instantaneous response times and over 90% success rate at jamming GPS systems also not mean Russia is winning? What exactly would mean that Russia is winning then? Is it gonna be "losing" all the way up to kyiv and then suddenly the war is over or what? Im just trying to understand how will we understand when Russia will be winning if it isn't currently?
Is it safe to keep usd and euro which are weapons of sanction. All countries are in fear of usd euro theft. West is just 10 percenr of world population
The real truth is that we should have helped Russia when the USSR fell. We didn’t, and now we have a problem we all have to deal with. Life is not a zero sum game. Game theory tells us that working in good faith means we all win. You can destroy others without destroying ourselves. Learn the lessons of ww1 and ww2. If we cripple our neighbours they will eventually cripple us.
@@PrairieCossackHow exactly? By funding Yeltsin's campaign? You know, the guy who built the putin system and was applauded by the west during that time?
De iure it is a federation but de facto it is not. The budget is centralised, regions have little of their own money - some of the poorest regions are those where oil and gas resources are located. Putin denied people the right to choose their own governors - they are not elected but chosen by Moscow.
@ our politicians are all elected by dirty money and you know it. Russia is no less a federation than usa. Each republic or state had a parliament, they have THEIR OWN LAWS. And they get good budgets. If you go to comparable size city in Russia and USA you can see the difference. Russia is building and growing, usa is rotting and falling appart.
@@dkudlayPresumably, you're an American. 1) rusnya has zero federation aspects comparable to the US. 2) No, rusnya is not "building and growing", just a few days ago, a central city sewage pipe burst that led to a five floor fountain - you can't make this shit up (buh dum tss, pun intended) If it's so bad in the US, why haven't you moved to rusnya? When was the last time you enjoyed a literal shit fountain in downtown Chicago?
@@ESF-EF Peace means allowing Russia to prosper and develop like any other nation. Can you imagine the US being sanctioned up to its' ears and isolated by the rest of the world for its' war crimes?
@@chriss2452 The difference being that you are absolutely allowed to demand that in the US, on public Television, prime time news. Saying that out loud in Russia means jail time at best and a visit by good old Doctor Novichok at worst.
Understand that nothing from the current Russian government can remain after Putin. Not one office, Not one idea. Nothing can remain, the new structure has to be built from the ground up.
Putin did not come up with Russia. He is continuing a foreign policy strategy that has formed over hundreds of years based on Russian geography, neighbors, competitors, etc. Even some of the most liberal Russian opposition leaders, like Navalny, supported Russian military interventionism to prevent NATO expansion. In case of Navalny in particular he was opposed to how kind and gentle Russia was in regards to Georgia in 2008 and called for an earlier intervention - that was his "opposition to the status quo". He of course ended up retracting his statements over the years - but he was much like an American leader in that regard: warmongering and ruthless but always apologetic after the deed is done, then rinse and repeat. The Russian government is entirely legitimate. It is one of the most significant cultures known to world with one of the richest histories and a truly sovereign governance system.
What poorly researched and HIGHLY biased material. This is the type of content that is just so cringe worthy you won't be sure if to take it seriously. 😅
Lost the Russo-Japanese War, lost a lot in World War I and sidelined herself away from the Allied Powers (therefore, lost), lost the Polish-Soviet War, obtained little strategic gains in the Winter War and suffered quite the casualties that forced a rethink in Soviet doctrine, lost the Soviet-Afghan War, and failed to remove Chechen independence during the First Chechen War.
@@pmayo7894 Russia is a juggernaut for sure, but its not a perfect fighting machine, its forces vary in strength and veracity down through the ages but they sorted out Napoleon, they RHEEMED Hitler and they will devour Nato.
@@andrerothweiler9191 In early September, Russian oil supplies to Hungary and Slovakia via the Druzhba pipeline, which passes through Ukraine, increased sharply. The average daily transit in the period from September 1 to 4 was 18.3 thousand tons, which is 17 percent higher than in August
You should make another video about the allegations of Natos refuse to accept Russia's membership. There was no any applications, yet many russians believes -TV myths- the opposite. Here's the quote of 2009 article on Reuters "Polish minister wants to see Russia in NATO": "Sikorski said his remarks should be seen in the context of NATO's "open door" policy and that Moscow had sent no signals of wanting to join. Most Russians still view NATO with deep distrust two decades after the end of the Cold War".
Good call. In early 2000's Putin asked IF he could join and were answered positive. I forgot who he talked to, but they said to put in an application. Putin said he don't want to wait in line and eventually declined. And now his propaganda machine claims to be rejected, inexistant agreements and a load of other related bs.
2007 Munich. A great speech; a pivotal moment. Pushing back against a belligerent policy outlined in the Wolfowitz doctrine and Project for the New American Century.
@@Aleks96 exactly; they lost more wars than they won.. at least the international ones.. it’s pathetic tinkers thinking they are this invincible force: THEY ARE NOT!!
@@robertvonschumann7297 how can you not understand such basic English? He’s saying Russia has lost lots of wars, and can be defeated again, if there is the will to do so
Keep on dreaming. I would say, the confrontation did not start by Russia. In fact Russia in early 2000's was hoping to integrate with the west but was rejected.
As a Russian in my late 20's, I can fully confirm your words. We Russians were enchanted by the West. Me and other children of the 90's were raised on the cultural inheritance of the two worlds. Dang it, we were learning both Pushkin and Shakespeare at the same time! My favourite TV channels were Jetix, Discovery and Animal Planet. Harry Potter was one of my favourite series, I remember the joy that each new HP book brought to me. My father was a dedicated Reader's Digest subscriber. We dreamed of becoming part of the West. Many of us did, or, at least, did try - through emigration, or, like me, - learning the language and browsing English-speaking resourses, sharing and picking up ideas, opinions, memes, etc. I remember this in real time, watching TV news with my father: NATO membership was denied, relationships deteriorated gradually, step by step... It was bitter to watch. And here we are.
@@abyssalAnalyst Show us the application to join the Nato. Сидят, пи#дят и занимаются мифотворчеством. Сами придумали, сами поверили и сами же обиделись. Лол.
it was NEVER possible you half witts, Russia is the largest nuclear state with advanced WMDs any real threT to the Russian state would result in the cauterization of the earth.
Lol this video thinks Russia will just sit by and let it happen, he also count on these western politicians (criminals themselves) on being just. 😂😂😂😂😂
Missing the pre-2007 diplomatic actions that directly lead to the events from 2007 onwards is clearly misrepresenting the case; Russia's attempt to enter NATO and the US opposition, as well as the US using NATO as a pawn to pressure Russia so as to avoid economical integration with Europe in any degree are very much instigating factors here. From the US perspective, Europe is a vital area when it comes to economical competition. The idea that Russia could integrate with the rest of Europe and perhaps form a nuclear block that can directly compete with the US was pretty much an existential nightmare for them. It would be impossible for them to veer off to Asia to contain China if Europe could still maintain a good economic relationship with Europe. By playing fiddle to US political pressure for 20+ years instead of pursuing our own European interests, we are, in the long term, resigning Europe to geopolitical insignificance.
Without Russia, there's no NATO 😅😅😅,it's would be useless.so the Americans don't want to loose their source of income from the European 😅😅& to control then 😅😅
Whether that be true or false, Western Europe does not need or want its incorporation with dictatorships. You imagine Russia joining "The West" to form a happy band, skipping hand-in-hand towards the setting sun. Ain't gonna happen. The same applies to China. Both are a long way from our democratic systems and hold themselves distant thereby.
If you're really "European" (doubtful), you're no idea what you're talking about and are highly misinformed. Learn some history why and how EU and NATO was created and how they changed after 1990. Europe is more relevant and least complying to US needs than ever, despite being its largest trade partner. By the end of this week you'll see if US will stay a trusted ally at all in the near future. If not, you'll get your wish of maximal soverignity which comes with military sabotage, which won't increase our chances to withstanding a nuclear, totalitarian/autocratic anti-western axis. Here's the news and reason why your subverted views are harmful: we're in a hybrid WW3 now, which only will escalate. There's no easy way out. We unite with allies and do what's necessary or perish, it's everyone's collective choice.
Honestly, I think you're underestimating the danger of succesfully destabilizing the Russian regime. The risk of nuclear weapons going missing in the chaos is terrifying enough on its own. In my opinion, the West ought to aim for a return to something like the pre-2014 status quo instead. That means rewarding lack of aggression and genuine willingness to talk, should Russia ever show these qualities. Russia does understand something other than force, namely, personal gain. We should appeal to that. Not by trading away pieces of Ukraine, but by offering a path to prosperity for both countries. Russia should be convinced to participate once again in the international rules based order (however grudgingly), because it was a much better deal for all involved than the current mess.
Putler is sociopath and he understands only power and force. He thinks Ukraine is Russia. First state/kingdom was Kievan Rus (Kyivan Rus). It was not Ukraine, Belarus or Russia. But today's descendants are definitely Ukrainians!!! Putler doesn't want to talk. He likes to conquer.
It's delusional for one to still be talking about Ukraine winning the war with Russia 🇷🇺 when 20% of Ukraine's land is in Russian hands with all the weapons from 32 countries, including the US.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Except: - Russo-Japanese War - World War I - Polish-Soviet War - Winter War (yes, the Soviets gained Finnish land, but it became of little strategic gain) - Soviet-Afghan War - First Chechen War Yes, Russia can be beaten.
Yeah and so what? The Americans recently lost many wars, the Germans lost 2 world wars, the French lost many wars (Napoleonic wars) and the Brits too. Or may you think the Poles would win this time? Dude, the Poles should thank the Russians for having their country's borders of today, or else they could give them back to Germans if they're so generous.
![The State of Russia in 2024 [DOCUMENTARY]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cQmQ4Bg6Qqs/mqdefault.jpg)
Its still incredible to me how many people are still in denial about russia. Either out of ignorance of willfulness.
You deliberately don’t capitalize russia & then wonder why people have a infantile understanding of Russia
@@max_skim-pontoon-coughwhat?
@@EEX97623 its a juvenile thing. I don’t expect you to understand though
@@max_skim-pontoon-cough That's because russia is insignificant on the larger scale.
@@hightower6645 glad to know you’ve moved on then.
Centre for Eastern Studies, you have great capacity for analysis. Are you in any active dialogue with structures within EU? Such analysis should be brought up on the desks of representatives
Thank you for this video. Hopefully more people (not russian bots) can see it.
Not all those who criticize NATO and the EU are Russian bots.
The true fact is you and your pro-western kind don't like to be criticized and you are genuinely hypocrite.
@salainenagentti3251 yeah... in other comment you argued that Finland totally lost Winter War, where in reality they remained natural instead of puppet state up until Russian invasion in Ukraine showed them neutrality does not work.
Go cry somewhere else vatnik, you can't fool anyone about being on Russian paycheck. And talks about "keep the ideas open" fail as hard as trying to rationalise flat earth arguments
Everyone who doesnt support your russophobic oppinion is a bot now?
Ah yes, the good old "everyone who disagrees with me is a russian bot"-mentality. Hope you've remembered to take your meds.
@@salainenagentti3251 There is not a single crime that can be attributed to NATO , except for cowardice
Most people in Western Europe choose ignorance and self-deceit but will get tears and sweat and blood instead. Waking up from this dream will be very painful indeed.
That is why Trump forcing them to pay up
It's astonishing that people tend to forget that just 30-40 years ago the borders of the GDR (Russias sphere of influence) were a mere 45 kilometers from the center of Hamburg away. 1700 km of buffer space wasn't enough for Russia's insecurities.
What do you know about "most people in Western Europe"? I'd say most people on earth are tired of American hegemony. Perhaps you are the one who needs to wake up? If you bully someone long enough, eventually you will face consequences.
Being nice to bully is stupid
Excellent presentation!!! Very clear on the structural problems of Russia and its inability to deal with those problems as an Empire, other than war and paranoia!!! And of course their incessant propaganda!!
Napoleon and Hitler were probably also thinking "it is still possible!".
So did Bolsheviks when they reached Vistula.
Or later as soviets when going for Helsinki.
The Finns lost the war and lost 13% of their lands.
Just look at the treaty of Paris of 1948, in case you have no knowledge about it.
@@salainenagentti3251 OH NO! by technicality they lost...
So what? Helsinki never fell, and out of all states in soviet sphere of influence they had it relatively good... still bad enough to hate Russia even more, but it took till 2022 when they realized all those neutrality guarantees mean nothing against modern Russia, till then they remained neutral since fall of Soviet Union.
@@cola98765 ⚡⚡COPIUM OVERDOSE OF PRIBALT MORON ⚡⚡
Finns lost, that loss is their only national pride.
@@Mr.Funnyman273 despite losing they remained a separate country, not even a satellite state of Soviet Union. What kind of victory was it for USSR?
and calling it copium and calling me names... yeah, go ahead, enjoy your totalitarian rule for as long as there is no mass conscription from Moscow and St. Petersburg.
After that starts... good luck, you'll need it.
(PS: don't bother threatening conscription over here, as unlike what some Russians believe, no army was deployed, so there is still plenty people to defend here)
Taktyczny komentarz dla zasięgu na siedem wyrazów
???
You start by omitting 20 explosions of military warehouses in Bulgaria that killed many civilians on Bulgarian soil, circa 2015 to 2018.
This was a lot worse than what happened in the Czech Republic and typical Polish behavior to downplay stuff that happens around the Balkans/Romania.
This is what you are missing from "how to defeat Russia" apart from the clowns that were blocking the Ukraine border. Start with yourself
Bravo for producing english content.
Please invite more International guests. Paul Ronzheimer, Arestowich, Carlo Masala, Bartosiak, July Roginski
Thank you for this quality content!
47 minutes of pure alarmist fantasy
Very good concise explanation of the situation and what must be done to resolve it
You fools lost! You went after Russia and lost!
Deal with it!
This video is made by 12 years old. Do you really think Russia will just sit by and let the country collapse? Foolish simple minded thinking.
very comprehensive analysis, thank you. it would be great if european politicians could read it
It would be awesome if European politicians began to cooperate with Russia instead of crawling for the US.
*Goes full Dr. Strangelove after 3 beers*
Superb material
A lot of Russain fan boys in here...
The west is 20 years ahead of Russia in military technology. How is Russia going to stop NATO if they can't even get near Kiev..
20 years? 😂😂😂😂
You mean ahead like in Afghanistan?
20 years? I think it's closer to 40.
We may not have the spaceships some might have expected that difference to make, but those bradleys are doing great over there.
Russia their milatary budjet 72 billion dollars! USA military budjet is 900 billion dollars! Western world have supported Ukraine 150 billion dollars military help! Russia have only 3% of world total military budjet! Great Britain attacked against Crimea already in 1853! Crimea was part of Russia in 1954! Khruchev ilegally moved Crimea part of Ukraine in 1954!
@@RaineriHakkarainen you statement is like comparing power to energy.
with those 150 billion they managed to hold Russia for almost 3 years, and both sides are equally exhausted 3 * 72 = 216.
think about it for a moment, if west could stop Russia with such small part of their budget, Russia has no chance against them if they cared, but they don't have such land grab ambitions like Putin does... no one wants to attack Russia, people want to trade, as that's more profitable for everyone unlike land grab wars.
You second point about Crimea being part of Russian Empire also does not land to much.
Before Russian Empire it was independent as a Khanate, covering just about the area Russia claims form Ukraine today + Rostov and Krasnodar regions.
Those regions remained culturally and ethnically distinct from Moscow Russia for centuries, just like many other regions Russia conquered, and all the way to 1926, according to census Soviet Union had at the time, people in modern day Krasnodar considered themself over 60% Ukrainian.
We can do it, but does everybody want to do it.
no one wants to do it why would i join their war fuck them Uncle Sam made it let him send his soliders to die 😂 propaganda to drag us into a war that is not ours ukraine is not the european union and not nato member so fuck this bullshitt video
One of the best videos about this topic! Thanks!
You don't elect or help elect Trump. Thank you to all Arab-Americans in Michigan. Putin and Netanyahu love you
Very good analysis (as always)
The material, as always, is of the highest quality. Thank you.
Highest quality propaganda 🤣🤣😂and you can even see, that says alot about how knowledgeable you are about Russian history 😭🤦
@sibusisotshabalala3662 Poland Russia 1920 :D
Propaganda?
4:24 just allow russia to conquer europe. Since they cant get their shit together.
Wtf, Dont you guys advise politicians? Tell them this, that's who needs to be convinced. Most people watching this already understand & agree with this strategy. Politicians need to be step up, ignoring the problem only hurts us more.
The west is heavily infected with bribed officials, politicians, & otherwise influential assholes on russias payroll. Thats the only possible explanation for our continued inaction, imo.
Our use of sanctions was naive. The oil price cap is the best example. Why on earth would russia abide by our sanctions, willingly cooperating with these restrictions & sell oil at a reduced price?
Due to inflated egos of western politicians, Once again it's embarrassingly delusional to think we could control the entire world & prevent russias sale of oil. The sanctions can be worked around, much like the "sanctions" or laws on drugs & guns. Despite being illegal, have we eradicated the issue?
Russia operates with a street mentality, perhaps many dont recognize it. Its untrustworthy, sneaky, manipulating, and aggressive. Violence & pain is the only language they understand. They're always willing to go one step further, violence is their trump card, and we look weak with our soft, overly bureaucratic, liberal statements of condemnation.
We need to understand a few things if we're to defeat russia. Sanctions add difficulty & expense, but countries can work around them. Sadly, its unrealistic to think any of the war criminals will be prosecuted, we're physically unable to do anything about it. Sanctions won't end the war, they arnt designed to bankrupt countries, just make their lives more difficult. Ramping up sanctions slowly and giving aid to ukraine slowly, provides time for russia to adjust.
The west must decide to inflict defeat on russia, form a cohesive plan, give ukraine drastically more aid, & start dominating russia like they do to us. Give them problems, ultimatums, & headaches.
Russia survived the war by acting tough, appearing strong, & keeping us scared.
Look up russias use of reflexive control theory, its a literal mathematical formula for controlling your enemies, we know they use it, yet it still works.....
This is a channel of an analytical institute subordinate to the Polish ministry of foreign affairs. Polish government (regardless of which party is in power) is actually saying the same thing as they do, the problem is, Poland does not have the same heft as say, Germany or France to actually get its point across to all of its allies. Complacency is too alluring an option when you're not directly threatened.
I love this narrator
Great video, thanks for sharing.
13:30 "Russia would simply become a federation" - exactly what we tried in 1990. 9:50 "[Some] still say we should reach a deal, [but]" 10:30 "Russia draws imaginary red lines for us but it doesn't draw any red lines for itself." - yes, they began drawing a red line on NATO expanding east of Germany, but apparently we also only draw red lines for others and continue our expansionism.
When I started writing this comment it resulted in me giving four paragraphs of detailed insight into my view on politics, so I stop on only pointing some parts out of the video, without necessarily commenting them. Although I will say - both sides play the game of geopolitics; here the means are the same on both sides, and there is only one final goal - global hegemony.
The usual Russian apologist spiel. No promise was ever made that Russia could veto the expansion of NATO; it repeatedly accepted in legally binding treaties that it acknowledged the sovereignty of its former satellite states, and a basic element of that sovereignty, denied to them under the Soviet yoke, is the right to enter or leave alliances as they choose. Knowing Russia for what it has always been, most of those states rushed to join NATO, as we see for good reason. NATO did not rush in, but rather was invited in by the sovereign states, all peaceful democracies, that wished to join it for protection against Russia. Nobody compelled them to do so, and it is exactly Russia’s inability to accept the sovereignty of neighboring countries that has driven NATO’s expansion. The problem is Russia, the solution is NATO. Dictatorships can never be granted veto power over the actions of democracies.
@@mebsreaand what if Mexico joined Russia’s purely defensive alliance? The US will lose their shit. And what if before inviting Mexico, Russia started spreading anti-US sentiments? And what about proceeding with Canada? We all know what would happen.
Oh, by the way, do you know any examples of NATO defending? Because I struggle to remember. But there are examples of NATO being on the offensive. Western hypocrisy is phenomenal. Spreading terror in half of the world in the name of freedom and democracy. No wonder so many countries want to join BRICS now. They were victims for decades and nobody cared
True - but the democratic value here is that nations have the freedom to choose. You say winner takes all. I say we need to try to defy that conclusion.
@@mebsrea how about US and European democracies supporting Yeltsin who shot his Parliament from tanks because this Parliament refused to accept Yetlsin's ways of reforms which perfectly aligned with the Western vision? Funnily enough this vision very much resembles to what US was making in Latin America.
Your talks on democracy is a complete and brazen lie. You guys only don't like the dictators which are not handy for you.
But even if we omit this point, in 1997 there was the Founding act signed between NATO and Russia, where both sides declared they will refrain from tearing Europe into blocks and from violence. To each other AS WELL AS to the 3rd party countries. Since then happened what? Not UN backed bombardment of Yugoslavia in 1999 (!), Iraq bombing with deceiving the UN on Iraq leadership wielding biological weapon, then Lybia, Syria...and it was sorta okay for you. But when it's Russia in same Syria, Georgia or Ukraine - it makes you squeak.
I won't pretend and preach I'm a moralist like you usually do, but I demand equal treatment. If you can, Russia can too. Period.
@@mebsrea You need to revisit Mearsheimers realism. Countries, powerful nations reign in their regions just like the US maintain their sea to sea security so Russia maintains Eurasia and it is the most naive fool that expects that large powerful nations would bend to little puny ones.
"You can ignore reality but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality" - applies perfectly to the Ukranian regime right now
Хватит геноцида украинского народа ⚡ Украина без Путина ⚡ Демократическая Россия тоже без Путина👍
Угу, и Польша без Туска и УПАдлины. Polska nie jest UKROPOLIN
@@deputykirsanov7314 good bot
@@johnandrew5467 what bot? I’m Belarusian. I can’t stand this Polish masochism, watching them supporting the same ukronazis that murdered their ancestors in Wolyn. Some even shout Slava ukraini, a nazi collaborator banderite slogan
@@johnandrew5467What bot is he? Or are you just another retarded american thinking "ooga booga cyrillic letters equal russian bot". You do know that ukrainians use cyrillic letters too which means you're equating ukrainians as russians, "johnandrew"?
Do an analysis what will be left of Ukraine after this war, how it will recover from this, because it's questionable if the West will actually going to go though on massive investments in full or people returning to places that are now rubble, leaving all of their jobs in they got now in the EU. Ukraine is being depopulated and it's infrastructure being obliterated every day, the longer this lasts for, the more grim it looks for Ukraine.
Oh shush you, the West rebuilt all of Europe just fine after both world war one and world war two. Even Russia managed to glue itself back together after those conflicts. Japan became a world leader in high-end electronics. South Korea did the same. Post-war reconstruction has been done succesfully many times before in democratic countries, usually with greater prosperity as a result.
@@davidschaftenaar6530copium 😅😅😅cry More 😅😅 Nazibot 😂😂.. clown 🤡🤡🤡.
Russia will have to pay repetitions ( quite few billions were seized from Putin goons) with modern drones and satellite imaging there will be lots of evidence and every town has mass grave nearby, the amount of evidence will be huge so all that money will never going back to Russia. Russians will be dirt poor for decades
@@davidschaftenaar6530 That was a long time ago, times and interests change. Us in Serbia were betrayed by the West, so Ukraine should be careful. It would be nice having a realistic outlook analysis done, because it could be presented to potential investors. The West not only bombed us and robbed us of our most important piece of land, but also now supports a regime that is non-democratic, corrupt, criminal, cleptocratic and that does not care about our well being.
Realistically a proper Study of the consequences, should have been carried out decades ago, before NATO began its East Ward Expansion in the Mid 1990s under President WB Clinton and the USA's "Project for a New American Century" (PNAC) 1996.
German national here.
This is an excellent and dedicated channel with quality information.
Well done!
Thank you -
Danke und weiter so 🎉
Cheers !
Please share it with Germans. Especially , East Germans .
It's full of nonsense. Gentleman in the black shirt says Russia wants all of Ukraine not just the Donbass, that's fear mongering designed to throw Europeans into paranoia. Ukraine is a clearly divided country like Germany, look at their voting history these 30 years of Independence. Many videos proving that eastern civilians are sympathetic to Russia like East Germany. If Kyiv wasn't so desperate to extract their resources, they'd have recognized and respected their Independence so they can be free to join NATO. But wisdom is short in Kyiv, they're learning the very, very hard way.
😅😅😅😅
@@JanKowalyk-gg2ir believe me I try. It’s like a lot of East Germans live in an alternate reality.. it’s sad
Regime change, How best to do that?
From inside. Just most Russians have no balls for that or don't want to. But most are not happy about the war either. Guess what options we have..
YT fascist mods are deleting all my detailed comments, but the only way is from inside. Majority of "insode citizens" have no balls for it. So what does it leave us with?
Waaaaiit, what do you mean by can still win? Ukraine is winning and Russia is about to run out of missiles, tanks, people and most importantly, shovels in a couple of days, right?
Nice narrator though
@@ivanschekoldin7315 Your name is not really Ivan?
@@hymen2393 loser
That's why only in 2021 you lost 996 000 people. Putler is on the power more than 2 decades now. Dictator!!!
Russia's got 1 important advantage over the West though: determination.
Western leaders are more worried about their immediate electoral prospects, and so only want to make sure things stabilise quickly in the short term.
Russian leaders though, plan for the long term, and are far more likely to lose their lives if they fail, and so are much more motivated to succeed.
Not really, the elections mean nothing as we can see all electable parties are NATO countries. The difference consists in the fact that for Russia Ukraine matters. For the West, Ukraine is a disposable trojan horse.
While I agree with your observation in general, I wouldn't call it an advantage though.
>Immediate elctoral prospects
True, one might think our politicians only think in electoral terms. But don't forget that they usually travelled a very long power-struggling road before we ordinary citizens have even heard their names. They know what it means like to plan for the long term because their personal long term goal was running for office for which they worked harder than we can possibly fathom.
The difference between democracies and autocracies is that by creating an institutionalized sense of uncertainty whether you will remain in power or not, we keep decision makers in check. Abuse of power is less likely in our systems and even though it happens too, it most likely creates less damage. Just raise the number of people who could potentially fuck up and each of them will fuck up less, individually. That's long-term stability.
>lose their lives if they fail/more motivated to succeed
On an individual level, it might be a motivating factor to raise the stakes for failure. But honestly, I think fear sucks as a motivating factor. Especially if you fear for your own life/the lives of the ones dear to you. You will quickly find yourself limited to a binary flight vs. fight view on the world and your decisions will consider self-preservation above all, not the long term consequences for either your domain of responsibility or your country. Also, people raised in a culture of fear make terrible advisors to those in charge. If you grow up knowing that your supervisor can make your life hell, you will quickly learn it's probably best for you to just tell him what he wants to hear. And these entire generations of yes-men sucking it up to their bosses out of fear probably also told Putin that he could "take Kiyiv in just three days, trust me bro".
edit: Think about Putin himself now. Do you think he is taking long-term decisions best for his country? Or is he just trying to cover his ass/remain in power? Imagine this Ukraine war thing he has going on right now doesn't end in victory but in defeat. Do you think he can just retire and receive pension for the rest of his days, yelling at the TV angrily whenever he sees his political opposition who became president after him? Don't think so. He'll more likely be hanging from a tree and God knows, he is very well aware of that too.
Great channel
This is just the Third Offset Strategy with extra steps.
Could you make a video about russian culture's toxic influence? Even in Poland books that proclaim russian imperial anti-West ideas are extremely popular
Could you give some examples of toxic Russian culture?
I saw Putin litening Tchaikovsky competition concertos like Tchaikovsky 1-2 Prokofiev 2-3 Scriabin Rachmaninov 1-2 and Rhapsody theme Paganini! Of course Putin did go crazy thinking we are the greatest like Hitler who tough we are the greatest cultue because Bruckner Beethoven Bach Mozart!
Putin was listening Tchaikovsky competition! Trump was watching ice hockey in 1994!
Thanks for the material. #stoprussianaggression #stoprussia
Utter garbage! Clearly Ukraine used the money for this propaganda!
You people are scared! You end t after Russia and lost!
OK. Joe Biden.
#stopsmokingdrugs 🤣😂
This is amazing ever since the collective West has been losing , so many of their channels have been propped. You are still going to fail
There is no thing such as "the collective West" though. That's the beauty of democracy and pluralism, we are allowed to disagree and do so constantly. Therefore, you will find channels spreading the propaganda of your preference and are left to decide on your own which version of reality is more likely representing the "truth".
Daydreaming
Facts!
Brillant interview!
Thanks for the material! It`s so imprtant!
I wish my government listen and act on the subject of this video. Щиро дякую, панове
Mr you are delusional, you are talking like Ukrainian forces have besieged Moscow.
Ukrainian forces moves to Siberia
but there is nuance...
americans beat soviet union without even entering the soviet territory
Very delusional people..
@@ShadyHub9 Yes, under proper leadership, who is going to beat Putin....Kamala hahahha!
@@martinminc4352 putin is weak, look what happens 1 year ago with prigozhin rebellion
Not enough people see the threat
Truth is simple.
Wow, 34 countries can’t defeat one country 😬 that’s embarrassing
54 not 34 according to Us secretaty Anthony Blinken
Then why are you sending weapons then if you're not fighting them?@@ESF-EF
@@husseinhussein466it’s called Military AID just like Russia gets Military AID from Iran NK China this is very different from actual boots on the ground and joining in carrying out assaults surely you already know this right
Outstanding discussion
Thank You for this analysis
I'm still surprised Poland still doesn't take matters into their own hands considering they were literally betrayed by both sides in WWII
Because they are not stupid, Kyiv attacked Poland in ww2, they were the ones who sides with Germany
@@glintongordon6811kyiv was occupied by red army. Their people fled. Did anyone helped? NO! did anyone helped the baltics? NO.
@@Lucas-wn5wm what are you talking about?
@@glintongordon6811 do you know what is red army?
@Lucas-wn5wm yes
The use of "We" is infuriating, when he says "we" he means Ukrainians, who are treated not like humans but as NPCs, that are expected to die for as long and as much as needed.
Anyone who really wants to "defeat Russia" should heed his own words, instead of silently expecting other to do all the job.
Is it unrealistic, does it mean you can't support Ukraine without being on the frontlines yourself? No, of course you can support Ukraine, but there must be an understanding that it's not "you" who is actually doing the defeating part.
Ukraine, most of all, wants peace.
The more i'm listening to this dude and his entitled-ass rant - the more i start to feel that Putin actually has to do something with Poland instead of current plans to simply securing the BSF assets and land corridor to them.
For starters - IMHO just a little "special attitude-adjustment operation" should probably do the trick, but who knows
Should be no fly zone
Komentarz dla zasięgu, pozdrawiam z Wrocławia 💅🏻
Из Бреслау*
Верните город немцам раз так ненавидите Россию. Верните все подарки
When their expertise was the reason for the suggestion of little Scholz and the bacon of hope and the miracle of the century of the Foreign minister it is again as good as trash.
The Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW) is funded by the Polish state budget.🤣🤣🤣😂👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿
Huh, they must've had a large budget cut it would seem, seeing how all they have to show for their plans for defeating Russia is a 48 minute long video of some swine oinking, grunting and farting.
@@Mr.Funnyman273 good bot
@@johnandrew5467 Good piggie, here have an acorn 🌰
@@Mr.Funnyman273 so now acorns are russian currency. not surpised.
@@johnandrew5467 It is usrainian delicacy
European pipe dream
How is it a Pipe dream?
@@Bitcoin1yit's boot.
La Russia conosce bene la mentalità dei politici Polacchi ,secondo voi se la Russia viene attaccata ,cosa ne sarà della bella Polonia .
Amici Polacchi ,questo signore e un altro ZELINSKY .
Apriti gli occhi
Try to start by not loosing. So far things are clearly headed in that direction, despite all the thought talk.
How many deadlines has it been for this war... heck, even for Kursk area alone?
Just Russia is slowly gaining land does not mean they are "winning"
There is no clear winner so far, and it's obvious both sides are strained, Russia more so.
@@cola98765 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 The enemy slowly diying and running out of men also doesnt mean Russia is winning? Delusional..
@@cola98765 So Russia taking land does not mean that its winning...got you. Does the fact that Ukranians rely on forced mobilization while Russia relies entirely on volunteers, effectively confirming that Russia has been successfully attriting ukranians also not mean that Russia is winning? Does massive desertion of up to 20% (as per most recent politico article referencing Ukranian MPs) also not mean that Russia is winning? Does the fact that Russia has adjusted to the point of near-instantaneous response times and over 90% success rate at jamming GPS systems also not mean Russia is winning? What exactly would mean that Russia is winning then? Is it gonna be "losing" all the way up to kyiv and then suddenly the war is over or what? Im just trying to understand how will we understand when Russia will be winning if it isn't currently?
A comment for support.
Romney was right
if these think tanks had any clue what they were doing ukraine wouldnt have acted like literal amateurs since day one of this war would they?
Hey Trump supporters, they’re talking about YOU!
Bullshit
Not only Zelensky can make stupid plans 🤣
What did you say about Zelenskiy?
Is it safe to keep usd and euro which are weapons of sanction. All countries are in fear of usd euro theft. West is just 10 percenr of world population
The real truth is that we should have helped Russia when the USSR fell. We didn’t, and now we have a problem we all have to deal with. Life is not a zero sum game. Game theory tells us that working in good faith means we all win. You can destroy others without destroying ourselves.
Learn the lessons of ww1 and ww2. If we cripple our neighbours they will eventually cripple us.
good bot
West DID, and not for the first time. All these efforts were wasted, same as before
@@PrairieCossackHow exactly? By funding Yeltsin's campaign? You know, the guy who built the putin system and was applauded by the west during that time?
@@johnandrew5467You've responded this to many posts here, NSA internet troll.
@@aliuli657 good bot
13:34 russia is already a full federation crazy boy! 😂
since 1918
De iure it is a federation but de facto it is not. The budget is centralised, regions have little of their own money - some of the poorest regions are those where oil and gas resources are located. Putin denied people the right to choose their own governors - they are not elected but chosen by Moscow.
@@wastaggio lie - governors are elected
@ our politicians are all elected by dirty money and you know it. Russia is no less a federation than usa. Each republic or state had a parliament, they have THEIR OWN LAWS. And they get good budgets. If you go to comparable size city in Russia and USA you can see the difference. Russia is building and growing, usa is rotting and falling appart.
@@dkudlayPresumably, you're an American. 1) rusnya has zero federation aspects comparable to the US. 2) No, rusnya is not "building and growing", just a few days ago, a central city sewage pipe burst that led to a five floor fountain - you can't make this shit up (buh dum tss, pun intended)
If it's so bad in the US, why haven't you moved to rusnya?
When was the last time you enjoyed a literal shit fountain in downtown Chicago?
I think you have reversed the flags of Ethiopia and Philippines. Great analysis tho.
Did i told you the Definitionen of Insanity..?!
Good analysis
You are delusional 😢we want peace ☮️
Peace does not mean ceding Ukraine to russia, but letting Ukraine win the war and regaining its territory.
we?
@@ESF-EF
Peace means allowing Russia to prosper and develop like any other nation. Can you imagine the US being sanctioned up to its' ears and isolated by the rest of the world for its' war crimes?
@@chriss2452 The difference being that you are absolutely allowed to demand that in the US, on public Television, prime time news. Saying that out loud in Russia means jail time at best and a visit by good old Doctor Novichok at worst.
@@mxarier You got things completely messed up. Read my comment again. Slowly.
Understand that nothing from the current Russian government can remain after Putin.
Not one office, Not one idea. Nothing can remain, the new structure has to be built from the ground up.
Putin did not come up with Russia. He is continuing a foreign policy strategy that has formed over hundreds of years based on Russian geography, neighbors, competitors, etc. Even some of the most liberal Russian opposition leaders, like Navalny, supported Russian military interventionism to prevent NATO expansion. In case of Navalny in particular he was opposed to how kind and gentle Russia was in regards to Georgia in 2008 and called for an earlier intervention - that was his "opposition to the status quo". He of course ended up retracting his statements over the years - but he was much like an American leader in that regard: warmongering and ruthless but always apologetic after the deed is done, then rinse and repeat. The Russian government is entirely legitimate. It is one of the most significant cultures known to world with one of the richest histories and a truly sovereign governance system.
@ can you develop your thoughts a little more, And summarize your ideas.
Keep dreaming imperi elist
Польска на войне 💀
It seams it is now fair for others to talk about decupling the West as a measure of everyone's survival.
What poorly researched and HIGHLY biased material. This is the type of content that is just so cringe worthy you won't be sure if to take it seriously. 😅
russian bot
Are you surprised 😅😅😅.
good bot
@@johnandrew5467 😆😆😆 copium Nazibot 😆😆😆 always preaching hate..... NaziBot clown 🤡🤡🤡😂
Stil pasting" bot "on anyone's comments that goes against polish funded propaganda 🤣🤣🤣😂
Rossiya can never be defeated!
Does not matter what the west do
Lost the Russo-Japanese War, lost a lot in World War I and sidelined herself away from the Allied Powers (therefore, lost), lost the Polish-Soviet War, obtained little strategic gains in the Winter War and suffered quite the casualties that forced a rethink in Soviet doctrine, lost the Soviet-Afghan War, and failed to remove Chechen independence during the First Chechen War.
hahahahaha!!!! Russia has been defeated numerous times, idiot!!!
And what war has the west won,
@@pmayo7894 Russia is a juggernaut for sure, but its not a perfect fighting machine, its forces vary in strength and veracity down through the ages but they sorted out Napoleon, they RHEEMED Hitler and they will devour Nato.
where can i send you the rubles
Russia exports majority of oil truth Black sea and baltic sea, taxing those exports and using it to give it to Ukraine is pretty great idea.
Russia still exports majority of oil truth Ukraine ))
@Chaldon-hl6yk no, that's not true
@@andrerothweiler9191 In early September, Russian oil supplies to Hungary and Slovakia via the Druzhba pipeline, which passes through Ukraine, increased sharply.
The average daily transit in the period from September 1 to 4 was 18.3 thousand tons, which is 17 percent higher than in August
@ yes, but still peanuts
This is not entirely accurate
This is propaganda, when you are presenting as academic paper make it balanced
you you expect western institutes to do the planning for you vatnik?
By making yt video or Reddit post, there I saved you 47 minutes of your time, thank me later
Hitchens spoke on em'.
Damn shame what happened to ruskies...
Fanfic!!
Presumes the Russian will not react to these measures
You should make another video about the allegations of Natos refuse to accept Russia's membership. There was no any applications, yet many russians believes -TV myths- the opposite.
Here's the quote of 2009 article on Reuters "Polish minister wants to see Russia in NATO":
"Sikorski said his remarks should be seen in the context of NATO's "open door" policy and that Moscow had sent no signals of wanting to join. Most Russians still view NATO with deep distrust two decades after the end of the Cold War".
Good call. In early 2000's Putin asked IF he could join and were answered positive. I forgot who he talked to, but they said to put in an application. Putin said he don't want to wait in line and eventually declined. And now his propaganda machine claims to be rejected, inexistant agreements and a load of other related bs.
2007 Munich. A great speech; a pivotal moment. Pushing back against a belligerent policy outlined in the Wolfowitz doctrine and Project for the New American Century.
What are you talking about?
@@ArtisZ Educate yourself on this. Hint: 2007 Munich Security conference.
@@reginaldpoofta5 good bot
@@reginaldpoofta5 classic rusobot opening with an ad hominem. Either you answer my initial question or don't talk to me.
@@ArtisZ Hitlers famous Munich speech, no wait.....Putlers famous Munich speech! 🤣🤣
Propaganda documentary
RT is propaganda with Russian puppet Simonyan. That’s why RT was taken down from RUclips
good bot
Oh no we're not bots. We're only exposing your dirty games and cruel intensions to control our countries in the name of "democracy".
@@johnandrew5467 youre bot.
@@reginaldpoofta5 good bot
Nice story ! Keep dreaming 😂😂😂
good bot
@@johnandrew5467 Go jhon, help the UAF at the frontlines instead playing keyboard warrior. They need new recruits.
How much you get payed to paste "good bot" in every comment that questions your polish funded lies🤣🤣😂🤦
You too 😂
@@sibusisotshabalala3662 good bot
You cant defeat Russia, look at the history and the present
Russia lost the war against Japan, then Russia lost the first world war against Germany, then against Afghanistan, Chechnya,...
@@Aleks96 exactly; they lost more wars than they won.. at least the international ones.. it’s pathetic tinkers thinking they are this invincible force: THEY ARE NOT!!
good bot
@so younrensaying that russia will not win this war?
@@robertvonschumann7297 how can you not understand such basic English?
He’s saying Russia has lost lots of wars, and can be defeated again, if there is the will to do so
Keep on dreaming. I would say, the confrontation did not start by Russia. In fact Russia in early 2000's was hoping to integrate with the west but was rejected.
Moldova and Chechnya say otherwise.
@@pmayo7894Chechnya was granted all the autonomy they ever wanted, then came the kidnapping and the terror and no surprises what followed next.
But it was fully integrated. How exactly it was rejected?
As a Russian in my late 20's, I can fully confirm your words.
We Russians were enchanted by the West. Me and other children of the 90's were raised on the cultural inheritance of the two worlds. Dang it, we were learning both Pushkin and Shakespeare at the same time! My favourite TV channels were Jetix, Discovery and Animal Planet. Harry Potter was one of my favourite series, I remember the joy that each new HP book brought to me. My father was a dedicated Reader's Digest subscriber.
We dreamed of becoming part of the West. Many of us did, or, at least, did try - through emigration, or, like me, - learning the language and browsing English-speaking resourses, sharing and picking up ideas, opinions, memes, etc.
I remember this in real time, watching TV news with my father: NATO membership was denied, relationships deteriorated gradually, step by step... It was bitter to watch.
And here we are.
@@abyssalAnalyst Show us the application to join the Nato. Сидят, пи#дят и занимаются мифотворчеством. Сами придумали, сами поверили и сами же обиделись. Лол.
it was NEVER possible you half witts, Russia is the largest nuclear state with advanced WMDs any real threT to the Russian state would result in the cauterization of the earth.
good bot
Hey bot spotter🤣🤣🤦
Everyone has a plan till they get punched. 😂😂😂 some random guy has all the ideas
Lol this video thinks Russia will just sit by and let it happen, he also count on these western politicians (criminals themselves) on being just. 😂😂😂😂😂
The video is made by a simple minded person. 😂
dla zasięgów komentarz.
Very informative!
Missing the pre-2007 diplomatic actions that directly lead to the events from 2007 onwards is clearly misrepresenting the case; Russia's attempt to enter NATO and the US opposition, as well as the US using NATO as a pawn to pressure Russia so as to avoid economical integration with Europe in any degree are very much instigating factors here.
From the US perspective, Europe is a vital area when it comes to economical competition. The idea that Russia could integrate with the rest of Europe and perhaps form a nuclear block that can directly compete with the US was pretty much an existential nightmare for them. It would be impossible for them to veer off to Asia to contain China if Europe could still maintain a good economic relationship with Europe.
By playing fiddle to US political pressure for 20+ years instead of pursuing our own European interests, we are, in the long term, resigning Europe to geopolitical insignificance.
Without Russia, there's no NATO 😅😅😅,it's would be useless.so the Americans don't want to loose their source of income from the European 😅😅& to control then 😅😅
Whether that be true or false, Western Europe does not need or want its incorporation with dictatorships. You imagine Russia joining "The West" to form a happy band, skipping hand-in-hand towards the setting sun. Ain't gonna happen. The same applies to China. Both are a long way from our democratic systems and hold themselves distant thereby.
If you're really "European" (doubtful), you're no idea what you're talking about and are highly misinformed. Learn some history why and how EU and NATO was created and how they changed after 1990. Europe is more relevant and least complying to US needs than ever, despite being its largest trade partner. By the end of this week you'll see if US will stay a trusted ally at all in the near future. If not, you'll get your wish of maximal soverignity which comes with military sabotage, which won't increase our chances to withstanding a nuclear, totalitarian/autocratic anti-western axis.
Here's the news and reason why your subverted views are harmful: we're in a hybrid WW3 now, which only will escalate. There's no easy way out. We unite with allies and do what's necessary or perish, it's everyone's collective choice.
Surrender you fools
🇷🇺🇰🇵 🇨🇳🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑
Honestly, I think you're underestimating the danger of succesfully destabilizing the Russian regime. The risk of nuclear weapons going missing in the chaos is terrifying enough on its own. In my opinion, the West ought to aim for a return to something like the pre-2014 status quo instead. That means rewarding lack of aggression and genuine willingness to talk, should Russia ever show these qualities. Russia does understand something other than force, namely, personal gain. We should appeal to that. Not by trading away pieces of Ukraine, but by offering a path to prosperity for both countries. Russia should be convinced to participate once again in the international rules based order (however grudgingly), because it was a much better deal for all involved than the current mess.
I agree to most of your saying just not the international rules based order, as it no longer exist and Russia isn't the only one to be blamed for it.
Putler is sociopath and he understands only power and force. He thinks Ukraine is Russia. First state/kingdom was Kievan Rus (Kyivan Rus). It was not Ukraine, Belarus or Russia. But today's descendants are definitely Ukrainians!!! Putler doesn't want to talk. He likes to conquer.
It's delusional for one to still be talking about Ukraine winning the war with Russia 🇷🇺 when 20% of Ukraine's land is in Russian hands with all the weapons from 32 countries, including the US.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Europe got barely any military. Only a couple have them.
You can never beat Russia on the battlefield, never ever😂
Except:
- Russo-Japanese War
- World War I
- Polish-Soviet War
- Winter War (yes, the Soviets gained Finnish land, but it became of little strategic gain)
- Soviet-Afghan War
- First Chechen War
Yes, Russia can be beaten.
good bot
Hers is the bot comment again🤣🤣🤣😂🤦polish fascist need to hire smart ppl this is sad🤦
Yeah and so what? The Americans recently lost many wars, the Germans lost 2 world wars, the French lost many wars (Napoleonic wars) and the Brits too.
Or may you think the Poles would win this time? Dude, the Poles should thank the Russians for having their country's borders of today, or else they could give them back to Germans if they're so generous.
@@salainenagentti3251 good bot
Very glad someone is having this discussion. Unlike EU & Germany when the Syrian migration began, in recent years.
How to defeat NATO Israel and USA
With wisdom.