End-fed Half Wave - the perfect antenna for your

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 фев 2025

Комментарии • 10

  • @mark_b
    @mark_b Год назад +6

    great presentation but also great AV production - loved the consistently good audio and the camera skills. Thanks for all the references, too.

  • @stevenscott7915
    @stevenscott7915 Год назад +2

    Super presentation! Thanks from a new ham who wants to build one.

  • @Reviews-Tidbits
    @Reviews-Tidbits 12 дней назад

    No ground wire?

    • @ViennaWirelessSociety
      @ViennaWirelessSociety  11 дней назад

      You can add a short counterweight, but EFHWs work without it as well

  • @gsudman
    @gsudman 11 месяцев назад

    Excellent presentation. I'm curious, you used 18awg copper magnet wire, do you know if 16awg could be used with an FT240-43 transformer? I know it might be a little stiffer to wind but might it otherwise work?

    • @ViennaWirelessSociety
      @ViennaWirelessSociety  11 месяцев назад +1

      It depends. Thicker wire has lower resistance, what will reduce resistive losses in the windings. On the other hand, thicker wire means smaller distance between windings, what can increase losses caused by inter-winding capacitance.
      Probably the best way of figuring out is to build two identical transformers, and measure them connected back-to-back. MM0OPX has a great demonstration of loss measurement using this method: ruclips.net/video/TZjY2Jim7fY/видео.html
      Of course the winding has to fit on the core, but I don't think it will be a problem in your case.

    • @gsudman
      @gsudman 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@ViennaWirelessSociety I appreciate you taking the time to respond. Thanks!

    • @ViennaWirelessSociety
      @ViennaWirelessSociety  11 месяцев назад

      @@gsudman It is worth noting, that the gains from increasing wire diameter will be limited by skin effect. According to the graph in wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect#/media/File:Skin_depth_by_Zureks-en.svg), at 1MHz the current penetration depth for copper is ~0.07mm. This means that the decrease of wire resistance will be proportional to the wire circumference (i.e. wire diameter in the first power), instead of the cross-section area (i.e. diameter squared), what is a case for DC currents.
      On the other hand, FT240 is such a large core, that the increase in losses caused by capacitive coupling.
      I think this is a great excuse to do some for some experimentation, and share the results :)