It's time to scratch the word game change out of the military lexicon. Weapons can be revolutionary, but producing weapons that are relatively good in large quantities is better for a big war.
and russia somehow doesn’t say propaganda?? Kyiv in 3 days lmao. Also that 2000 number includes damaged and abandoned or captured and stolen tanks, not just destroyed. Around 550 russian tanks have actually been destroyed while remaining 1500 are damaged causing them to be inoperable of some sort
@@dmitrit.4862except they've only managed to kill very few and disable about the same number. The eventually, when Germany stops being incompetent and rebuilds em', they'll just be back in the field. Something that none of the piece of shit Russian tanks can pull off. 🤣
@@RustyBear Why do you call him pootin would you rather sleep with Sleepy Joe I mean Putin atleast worked out when he was in the KGB never seen a US president get baptized somethings not right you must support child trafficing because man does hollywood and DC not support the Sound of Freedom movie man wake up.
Most people today, don't realise, or have forgotten, why the Soviet Union crushed the huge western army of Hitler and all his allies. That happened soon after Stalin declared the opening of the 'Second Front' of the Red army arsenal.. a huge military industrial complex behind the Ural mountains. In it, the Soviets produced all of their superior new weapons systems...The Rocket propelled Katusha artillery, the new Mig tank killers aircraft, the new upgraded varieties of heavy Soviet tanks, and the legendary upgraded T34s...and the list goes on and on.. By the time the Germans knew what was hitting them so hard, shredding their 'invincible' army to smitherins...it was too late...the Russian Red Army had entered Germany. That was the famous Soviet Second front ... The ability to respond and manufacture winning practical weapons in huge numbers, easy to operate in practical terms, and delivering the fire power, other countries can't produce. Today, not much has changed...only the Russians have become masters now, of producing the most effective firepower.. No ifs..No buts...The proof is all out here, to be seen in all modern wars, up to today.
Hahaha the mass losses of Russian soldiers being sent forth like cattle haven't quite made it to you have they? Russia lost A LOT of men in the war, they didn't fight very effective, not like how the Germans fought. The "not one step back" order was issued. But yeah, if they tell you at school Russia is the no.1 superpower in the world that just happens to struggle with their "two weeks" invasion of Ukraine just believe them
Its not a war, its still a special operations. This is not the patriotic war, Putin is not Stalin, Russia is not the USSR. The entire country is not mobilized to fight this war. Putin is fighting this war with one of his eyes on the Russian people, and on his possible rivals,
Hey Ivan fanboy I am sorry to ripp you out of your Dreams but do you know anything about history and reality? Because because a lot of your statements are incorrect.
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 How? The largest battles in WW2 were on the eastern front. Russian and Chinese weapons are much faster and cheaper to manufacture whereas American weapons are complicated and expensive so contractors make more money.
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 The only thing he said that was incorrect, Cosplay-Castro fanboy, was his use of the term "the Russian Red Army." It was NOT "Russian," it was as much Ukrainian and Belorusian as Russian... whether you like that fact or not.
Не стоит смеяться над T-55, у него есть защита от радиации и его создавали для ведения ядерной войны. Так, что этот танк не так прост, как можно подумать. "Т-55, имеющий противорадиационную защиту снаружи и внутри, оборудован датчиками, распознающими применение поблизости ядерного оружия. В случае их срабатывания система автоматически отключала бортовые электросети и двигатель машины, переводя ее в ожидание ударной волны. А для защиты экипажа включался сепаратор-нагнетатель, создающий избыточное давление и не пропускающий радиоактивную пыль."
@@prosto_chilloviy677 ты не прав, кремлебот. Я за Россию. Но кремлеботы с бц Лахта-2 на ул Оптиков это такие конченные быдлы, что они обязаны ответить.
@@RonaldoFanIndeed Any update on the conviction of Colonel Alexander Denisov who was stealing engines from T-90 tanks then sending them to Ukraine front??? He sold the engines to local Russians to be used as generators.
All tanks are useful but very vulnerable in the current modernized warfare. No tank can survive a direct hit from precision artillery, rockets & some drones that are available & used by both sides. The Russian advantage is that its MIC’s primary objective is to produce large numbers of weapons for use in the current conflict. America’s MIC’s primary objective for many decades seems to be to generate massive excessive profits. The results of these different objectives is that Russia has accumulated a huge arsenal of weapons & munitions with the ability to replenish its arsenals at a respectable rate while the Western MICs have lost their ability to do the same. The Bottomline is that greedy corruption has its consequences that cannot be quickly remedied!
West combines quality with quantity. Like the sherman, Sure there was slightly less sherman’s than T34 but they were way better than T34 and they had more sherman’s than german had panzers/tigers. By the way The USA alone has 2500 ACTIVE abrams while Russia has only 2000 ACTIVE tanks including T72/T80/T90. Russia counts inoperable broken tanks as their fleet lmao. Otherwise I think you’re licking putins feet.
Doubt this is a really a "game changer": As has been reported on various western media sources, Russia has lost well over 42 million tanks in just the last 17-18 minutes, 13 billion soldiers, over 150% of their missiles are being shot down, and Ukraine will have Moscow completely surrounded before I finish writing this post.
@@tombombadil8709 1) To "de-nazify" Ukraine 2) To de-militarize Ukraine 3) To stop NATO expansion 4) To sieze all of Ukraine 5) To sieze Ukraine in a few days 6) Failed to establish air dominance 7) Failed to establish beach-heads 8) Sending two non-aligned countries (Finland & Sweden) to join NATO- etc etc - then his objectives changed to take smaller parts of land, only to lose over 50% of the stolen land in a Ukranian blitzattack . Ukraine is now armed more than ever and he's risking losing even Crimea thanks to his stupid tactics. All this "being the second strongest army" and "having superior weapons". His airforce is hiding behind the borders. His black sea fleet having to flee its home port. Sinking of his black sea flagship. I (and any army) call that an utter failure. 🤣
They are, however they cannot be applied in the fashion they are meant to. Multiple reasons, amongst them inadequte demimin and not enough airforce capabilities. Like using a hammer to drill holes. It wont work.
Oryx the guy who counts unknown vehicles as Russian?The guy who don't count Lancet and ka 52 strikes? The guy who counted the same vehicle from different angles and count it as different vehicle?
is it 1 guy? i suppose its more than one but yeah... i guess they cant cheat with t90m so much because there are less of those. wonder how much fake data did they produce with more numerous tank types
The guy who puts unknown vehicles as Russian if original video or photo is from the POV of a Ukrainian strike, and it goes into Ukraine if the original is from a Russian POV. The guy who does count lancet and Ka-52 strikes, and the guy who removes duplicates using geolocation and will quickly correct any repeat that makes it through. Nice cope though
If you took the time to investigate, you'd know that every one of your allegations, is complete nonsense. Oryx has one of the absolute best methods of verification of any similar reporting, And it's not a "guy", but a team of people. They report on conflict losses all over the globe, not just in Ukraine. They use a number of different verification techniques. But let's talk about your claims. When there are a dozen clearly identified Russian vehicles in an obvious position of a formation and one vehicle that is no longer identifiable as to what it is, whose vehicle do you think it is?? Argentinian? Of course it's Russian!! As for double counting, multiple verification techniques are used including geolocation information, Satellite imagery, and other location related information such as historical imagery from different days and times. It's a lot more thorough than you imply. As for what weapons systems brought about the demise of a target, that isn't so easy to identify. Someone might post a claim of credit to a Ka-52 for example, but if there is not enough to verify that, why would you just trust the claim? It is this exact same verification logic that make Oryx data reliable. They don't deal in opinions, they use what they can best verify as factual data. Can they make mistakes? Yes, but it's low probability, and that's going to happen without bias. People much smarter than you, who have more resources available, have concluded that these guys are overall the best and most reliable. Generally, their data runs a bit behind real time because the take the efforts to verify every data point. If a T90 gets mis-identified as a T72, that's really a minor error which does not impact credibility. If the same tank that was listed as damaged later ends up as destroyed, it's going to be hard to catch that. Likewise if a Russian tank get's captured and later gets identified as a Ukrainian loss, does that corrupt the data? I don't see it that way and it's possible for both sides to have lost the same specific tank. That kind of thing is insignificant enough to have little impact on the overall database.
@@Andzrej_Polska😂😂😂 я в шоке бываю от таких заявлений 😂 Россия воюет против всего блока нато во глове с сша !! У Украины даже своих патрон не осталось !! Украина уже давно проиграла бы как минимум раз 10 !! НАТО уже пожалела что вязалась в эту войну !! Уже многоюие натовские страны воют от бессилия !! И от того что у них не осталось оружия !
Hehe, you better stop swallowing gov controlled western mainstream news straight down without thinking. Russia are still only have military operation in Ukraine, as Putin said in every speech, Russia have a goal to demilitarized Ukraine completely. And wipe out US trained soldiers and western weapons. As Putin said after biden admits that he wanted to weakening Russia and have a regime change, it's not Ukraine who's Russia's real enemy. US are Russia's main enemy, you are aware of it's still military operation ? Russia have not decided to declare any war against Ukraine, neither have Ukraine against Russia. US are using Ukraine and their nato alliance trying to weakening Russia, yes. Did you know that obama already in 2008 gave green light to start working on getting control over Ukraine ? Jeffrey Sachs said it, he was shocked. Because he knew US crossing Russia's red line. Responsible politicians in Washington also knew that, it was their plan. After US successfully had their presidential coup in Ukraine 2014. US started training and prepare Ukrainian military for this tragic proxywar trying to weakening Russia together with sanctions. US was confident that they would crush Russia with sanctions and kicking Russia out of SWIFT payment system. So US blocked the world trade with Russia. Well, sadly for US Russia of course knew what US working on and planned. So Russia already had their own payment system without using dollar together with China bank. So that the world freely could trade with Russia, and it's nothing US could do about it. US failed with absolutely everything they trying to weakening Russia with. Russia and Ukraine are the two largest bread basket countries in the world, that's why US trying to weakening Russia. Control over the food and energy that the world needs from Russia and Ukraine. US would managed to get control over the world 🌎 But They ending up weakening themselves dollar and Europe more. Heard 41 new countries want to join BRICS alliance and use their new payment system without using dollar 💵 That's why responsible politicians and globalist elites are so desperate right now, what's going on geopolitical just now. Are really serious for US, world didn't like US cynical plan using Ukraine and sanctions trying to weakening Russia. So this tragic proxywar make US much more weaker, everything is going wrong way for US. Jeffrey Sachs says that he is not surprised, he said US have had over 100 war's around the world since 1991. And still threatening with economic sanctions if they don't support US interest trying to get control over Russia. 43 countries have US sanctions against just now. biden administration are freezing themselves from the rest of the globe. That's a fact, do some research on BRICS expansion, you understand what I am talking about.
That is because you do not understand the sanctions. It is impossible to fully block off russia from buying chips. Right now russia goes out of their way to buy it through other countries. Somewhat less quantities, higher prices. Not a total block
@@appakinggg Most chips in the world are made by a company in Taiwan called TSMC. They have a near monopoly whne it comes to the most advanced most cutting edge chips. Probably more than 90 of the 100 most advanced chips nearest to you, we're all made in Taiwan by a company called TSMC. They make the chips of Apple, most Androids, Nvidia, AMD, the even make some chips for Intel. Even China relies on Taiwan for advanced chips. The chip shortage of a while ago...it was because of this one single company. South Korea produces most of the rest of the chips. Most military countries make their own military chips, because older manufacturing processes are more robust for military grade chips. In other words, cutting edge manufacturing is too delicate for military purposes. When it was discovered that the US used back doors in Intel chips to spy on their own allies, everyone switched to locally made chips, if possible. Russia did this too...their government PCs use chips that's based on Intel's abandoned Itanium architecture, that they manufacture themselves.
They were already tested in Iraq, and they were popped like nasty zits with ease by USA. This got reinforced in Ukraine where Russian tanks are being destroyed by the thousands.
In 1990th, I have seen field with approx 10k tanks on conservation, in Western Siberia - it was impressive view. "SVO" gives a good kick to military production around world but in Russia heavy equipment factories are not demolished/outsorced like in US and EU and there is no shortage with resources and power. There is no way someone can win direct war with Russia, only back door methods may work (perestroika, Gorbachev, etc)
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 these 10К tanks most likely rotted and decommissioned, but enough new ones were made. Тhe view itself was impressive - so much metal and labor! I haven't seen so many before, it is crazy. If you ever were an infantryman stuck in a field in the mud after rain (happened to me once on training), and your tank (not the enemy) is spinning nearby - you feel like a fly in honey ... a shitty feeling to be in an open place next to the tank when you can't run or jump.
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Potentially, after few years, USA and NATO may produce more than Russia because they have more resource but it requires time and reasonable prices that private companies don't like. In order to be able to produce more without breaking economy, military industry should be nationalized. Can you believe that? And who knows what happens few years later - may be it will be not needed? There is no heavy facilities for Abrams in USA - last one in Detroit was demolished in 2000th; no artillery for tanks - Germany produced it. It seems that most western counties moved to post modern, post industrial life style and all real business (engineering, industry) outsourced. The best business now is 1) cut energy and resources supplies from Russia to Europe and squeeze money from Europe by selling gas to it 2) sell old military equipment and ammunition instead of utilization - probably it explains why and how it goes as it goes.
And the last - no one wants real big war with nuclear heads - so it is just a business. While political situation is stable in Russia, there is no military option to win. Poor Ukrainians - they are just dying for someone's business.
2:40 - "According to Oryx..." Folks, I checked out Oryx early in the war, and saw how hilariously low their standard of proof is. I randomly clicked on about 100 instances of claimed destroyed ("confirmed") tanks, an at least 30% of them could be dismissed as fake straight up. Reasons : not identifiable as either Russian or Ukrainian; not identifiable as being in the current war at all (could be from Yugoslavia or Armenia or some such); not identifiable as being in any way damaged, merely a picture of a tank in the distance...! It baffles me that sensible people are still treating it as an authoritative source !!
@bobbman3000 1 second ago Can you find me a single entry in that list for a tank entry that is incorrect? Just one singular entry. You'll probably find one (it is impossible to be perfect when counting THAT many losses), but the time it would take for you to do that should help you realize. Oryx obviously has it's issues, but it's still a great source. WarSpotting is better though. They are much more thorough, it's regularly updated, and it's easier to sort stuff.
I've got a better idea : YOU take it upon YOURSELF to go trawling through those thousands of entries WITH AN OPEN, ENQUIRING MIND, at all times asking yourself "could this here tank in the distance be actually UNDAMAGED and INTACT ?" or "could this tank here be actually photographed before 2022?" or "could this plain green APC with no insignia in the distance belong to the other side?" You will find many like this. @@ImBigFloppa
Ukraine lost all its tanks, then all the tanks that Poland handed over to it, then lost almost all tanks from the Czech Republic, Germany, Britain... Now Ukraine is again asking for weapons, which will also lose.
According to Oryx based on photo evidence Ukraine lost 600 tanks in total and 400 tanks destroyed. So your figure is not correct! At the same time the Russian losses were 2173 tanks of which 1389 were total loss. Probably the russian losses are over 3000 by now, and they are bringing more ever older tanks! Also these losses are minimum that can be documented, so the losses are bigger. The funny thing is that there have been big celebrations by the russians that they knocked out 7-8 Leopard tanks, 2 total loss, rest be repaired, but they dont realize that at least 3000 russian tanks have been destroyed, by comparison. So after russian logic the russain tanks are better then the western tanks! Funny!
Ukrainians have learned to use Javelin missiles very effectively…but now they’ve figured out that a drone carrying an improvised tandem charges to the engine decks actually disables the tank. Does not destroy the tank…but enough damage for the crews to abandon it. A Javelin costs about USD$80k…an improvised kamikaze drone costs about $700. Wow…
Their tactics are fine, and their doctrine. THis is not hearts of iron 4 btw. This is reality. The problem is the western digitalized totalitarian dictatorships sending all their equipment to a foreign country which has a insane corruption problem and isnt even in nato. They also fund neo nazis in their own army. Thats the problem.
Without infatry to support the tanks, it does not matter how advanced the armored vehicles are, all are easy to destroy with the proper anti-tank weapons. Also if the numbers about the lost and captured tanks are correct, it will take a lot of time to replenish the fleet and it's far more cost effective to produce and use a Javelin for instance. In summary, Russia won't change the status quo with doubling their production.
The numbers are wrong, we got video evidence of 5-30 tank Ukraine tanks destroyed by artillery, mines, Lancet drones, Ka-52 attack helicopters, MLRS missile barrages daily (nowadays they use again more tanks in the South, 80% are destroyed in these assaults) . Naturally the true loss is minimum twice, not everything recorded and showed. Infantry causes less than 5%. Ukraine uses Artillery and drones mainly from distance, not Anti tank infantry.
@@DeepSlice I live in NATO cou try but yes they sacrificed 40% of received Western armoured vehicles and tanks to press through. As i wrote minefield, missile barrages and complete air control is against them. The question how much they gain for this sacrifice. The attacker also always have bigger loses even when same artillery, air support present. The question isn't the equipment, it's manpower. Russia bigger, so they can use only contracted troops and volunteers, and using conscipts only in Russia for support transport, defense, etc. They get 1000 volunteers for money daily. Ukraine uses conscipts, 18-60, and those ready to do their duty are long joined. It's super bad that only those they must conscipt by force left, using vans, getting people from market, streets. I understand they must, but this show they are running out of men. Having losses 1 to 1 isn't enough, Russia got 4x numbers. This also proves their bravery.
The supply of US ATGMs is drying up. Not just for Ukraine, for everyone. The production lines literally have to be spun back up and that doesn't happen over night.
a source that has the evidence to back it up like Russia they would say they destroyed 100 himars and u believe that but when actual video evidence comes to light and how bad Russia is losing u say oryx is fake my guy please before u speak try not make yourself look like a total dumbass btw the russian nazis have lost over 11,000 tanks while Ukraine has only lost 3,900 and thats confirmable by video and photo proof.
@@ImBigFloppa who called it reliable? The MSM from the west. There is no consensus that oryx is correct. Only western sources. Quote oryx because it fits their narrative. Multiple different forums have found highly questionable data on the site. Like they captured 500+ tanks yet they still had no tanks to do an offensive? That would seem odd, they should have an abundance of extra tanks or all those tanks have been destroyed. Ukraine literally said they were out tanks and had to wait for tanks from western colonizers because they had so few. Where is oryx data on those 500+ tanks that seem to be unaccounted for.
@@ImBigFloppa это тот самый орикс который русский танк получил царапину : оу , русский танк уничтожен украинский танк разлетелся на куски : его отремонтируют и вернут в строй ну как такому не верить )))
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1you have no clue what are you talking about. You just said that Abrams is crappy tank: heavy, not great armor for that weight, fuel thirsty, all that with outdated 105mm gun.
😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃The Russian army had about 3500 tanks in service in 2021, according to that nonsense they lost about 2100 tanks in Ukraine, considering the number of deployed units that never exceeded 50% of the Russian forces, that is about 1750 tanks, so they lost more than they should have. Super logical and verified messages. Just as true as the T-55, T-62 tanks are from the 1940s. Find objective information or don't make videos.
@@radekslar3576Логика? Откуда у тебя сведения о 2100 уничтоженных российский танков? Это тебе сказали те же самые люди которые тебе обещали европейские зарплаты после майдана? И ты опять им веришь? Ответь лучше на простой вопрос. У Украины было около 3000 советских танков на 2021 год. Залужный попросил 600 иностранных танков для контрнаступа. Вопрос: зачем ему эти танки если есть 3000 советских? Куда они делись? Сгорели на поле боя, да?
Вы неправильно прочитали мой комментарий. Я, наоборот, насмехаюсь над информацией о тысячах уничтоженных русских танков. Я пишу, что в том видео есть сообщение о большем количестве уничтоженных танков, чем развернутых русскими.
The main reason that Russia did lost this bulk of MBT's is old expired tactics of sovietic era, and also second being the traning of the crew on there tech; the part with bad quality parts, it can be found in any military tech, because is all about $$$$$
What happened to the ground breaking T-14? Russia has had problems with production an they stated they were making 60 new units per month. Overhauling older models is time consuming and didn’t address the inherent problems of the self loading system and stowage of live ammunition in the turret and floor. Last week the Ukrainians destroyed the plant that manufactures electro-optical systems for all Russian tanks as well as being cut off from cut off from importing Swedish and French fire control systems, computer chips for engines and other electronics! Wonder if this is a face saving propaganda report minimizing the failure of Russia’s armor designs. Ukraine has reduced the Russian Ka-52 Alligator fleet by an estimated 25%of Russias total machines. With 25% losses I’m sure crews aren’t overly excited to man these machines. Where is the Su-57 Felon Russia’s world beating 4.5th generation fighter. India walked away from buying and manufacturing the fighter as it did not meet it’s specifications or role. Basically Russia lost the cash to make India’s and their own planes from the profits. There are no other buyers so far. The war has hurt Russia’s military sales and reputation with its massive equipment loses in Ukraine to Western equipment. This is not good as the military sales finances the Russian military.
Russians lost 500 tanks in first day of Kursk battle. Germans lost less, but could not keep up with Russian productivity so as stamina. Now it is even worse for NATO. They have nothing to offer.
@@AaronC123-q9t Entire West now is weaker than Germany then during WWII. Germany was ruling almost entire Europe BTW... West is nto finances, Russia into units. War is about units not about finances.
@@gostan2718 Inherited nothing...Have half the population, USSR has so I don't see what you're argument is. Corruption? Yes, it's top notch in Russia. Socialism? Nope, it's a capitalist state with a great gaps between the poors and the richs. So please explain?
@@AaronC123-q9tIf we check the numbers of equipment/soldiers we need 1.5 more germany to have more than the modern day numbers. Most NATO countries did not spent much money on their army in the past years..
The channel RedEffect has a very interesting video analysing the production rate of T-90Ms, you should check it out. It's called something along the lines of "T-90M performance in Ukraine"
Even if it's cutting-edge, how long would it take for the crew to master it? Not to mention many strikes happen due to the lack of countermeasures being taken to prevent it since most of the personnel weren't trained that well.
there is arena s soft kill which no longer uses shtora jammers, it uses aerosol ammunition (basically very advanced smoke launchers) and a Russian tank is easier to get used to than a western one iirc
I love tanks tank but the truth is no tank is invisible , history make that very clear. But i adore the Russians approach on tank manufacturing. Cheap and efficient, easily used and repair and able to large scale manufacturing. This is very logical
Помню они говорили что леопарды изменят ход войны, а что мы видим что относительно слабый против бронированных танков дрон ланцет легко проходит броню леопард 2а6, а против старых т72/64 он не мог 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@00shakz12Western tanks are far more advanced ofc because west is more technolicaly advance and Russia doesnt produce any of own components. Western tanks are usually not lost only tracks get destroyed which can be repaired and thats what happend with Leopards in Zaporozia and it was due to heavy mine fields and artillery strikes. Meanwhile first T 90 was lost around Kharkiv year ago 😂
Russia only has 2…T-72BM/T-90 and T-80…but T-80 is only used as reserve and taken out of the mainline after Chechnya disaster. US has M1 Abrams series (A1, A2, A2 SEP, A2 SEPV3/4 etc). Each nation has different military doctrines - and the US knows what they are doing.
unfortunately you have the wrong pictures from the latest T-72B3M. The never versions hav much more reactive armor.also the T-90M3 has changed sind the Ukrainian Conflict. And by the way, Oryx is biased towards the west.
If the Russians are so brilliant, then why did several backhoes, some dynamite, and some shoulder mounted rockets stop them at Kiev's suburbs? Also, the current top Chess Grandmaster is Magnus Carlsen, who is from Norway. The top Russian is ranked fifth.
@@dougstong5723 я правильно понимаю , что мясо из заключенных разбили в бахмуте элитную украинскую армию обученную экспертами из НАТО с поддержкой всего мира и лучшим оружием ? вы же понимаете , что такие утверждения больше унижают украинцев чем русских ))) Каждый раз когда вы говорите "русские воюют лопатами" задумайтесь почему они ебут вас даже лопатами и почему зеленский до сих пор не кататься на абрамсе по красной площади если у русских всё так плохо
Sure, a lie is still a lie no matter how many times one keeps repeating it, doesn't make it the truth, Ukraine has not even breach Russian defences, and down to only reserves whatever will they do.
Oryx is like a old fisherman telling a story about how he catch the biggest fish. Russia lost some tanks but not in this overrated numbers 💥💣 and dont forget that Ukraine did has the largest post soviet armor. That the needed western armor is enough to make your own conclusions. T-55's are used as a fixed mobile howitzer in second line as support. We didn't see them in the frontline and no need. Russia has a shitload of t72, t80, t90 and they come fast (upgraded) out the factory. And Russia isn't yet in full war modus.
I saw someone commented that how many tank does Russia produce and how many did Ukraine destroyed in a single day. After Leo 2 destroyed they don't appear again. I just invited them to comment.
No new tank will make a difference , T34 , T50 and those old Tanks will make a difference . These new tanks will be commanders for critical push and strategic operation , but for maintaining the battle line the old tanks will do . Tank is a Tank , AK 47 still works . of ocurse Russia has to upgrade , not because they need it for Ukraine , but because they need to sell it . This is why they made it , to keep up . Not becase they need it , they dont need it for Ukraine , its an Urban warfare , Drones , artillery and Air power supporting troops on the ground , simple as that . Simple is good .
I was enjoying the video till it reached the propaganda objective of which it was made. If Russians lost/abandoned 3k tanks I can safely say I'm the king of England😂😂😂
You know what the "U" in "Uralvagonzavod" is? Ural? You know where the Ural mountains are? Yeah, an ICBM will travel so far, going to end civilisation that way?
ah yes, and start ww3, very good idea. current Russia has been beyond tolerant of nato aggression so far, despite constant provocation by Urkaine. Even after the assassination attempt via drone, Russia has been beyond calm.
Who cares if it's updated. A javelin missile or sort like can blow up the turret with ease. The tank shells are stored below the crew, not in a separate compartment.
Actually most ammunition detonation occurs not in the corusel it occurs in the turret because there is ammo in the turret for the T-72 this is why alot of the times T-80 crews don't experience the exposive effect as much as in such this is a cope comment the AMX-10RC was destroyed and killed all crew from 1 artillery round that did not land on the vehicle only near it this is from a ukrainian battalion personal. The T-90M did fix this issue with having sperate compartment in the Turret. Because saying that the courosel will ignite alot is like saying any sherman will because its on the floor the ammunition its the best place to put it at with sacrafising crew comfort. Most chances that shrapnel get to the bottom of the tank is pretty low especially if its top attack aummunition that is programmed to his center mass on tanks anyway. It kills crew but any tank would suffer that fate. Seen as with leopards being striked with artillery.
Well, if you want them to be operated by children, okay NPC, because the west and the Ukrainian government it's been very serious about fighting to the last ukrainian.
Anyone believing the figures coming from Oryx urgently needs to have his head examined. Not only is Oryx far from impartial, but also proven to fudge the numbers by counting the same tank photographed from different angles as separate tanks and not making the distinction between Ukrainian and Russian tanks.
More candidates to apply for the World Turret Launch World Championship... Although they arrive high, they have not yet managed to put any into orbit... But with Russian teNAZIty they surely succeed.
@@inisipisTV Difference is that there is absolutely zero validity to the claim that the Sherman tossed it turret any more than any other tank. In fact, battlefield reports and first hand reports both show that the Sherman was (by a pretty wide margin) the safest tank to be in.
@@ImBigFloppaAnd not only was sherman safe, it was also the most reliable and versatile tank. You could do anything to the chassis like slap a bigger gun (105 mm variant) aid in mine warfare etc. It combined quality with quantity which the russians and germans both lacked. 50,000 produced sherman’s would win against 65,000 produced t34s.
@@vulgarisopinio if anyone outside Russia uses the expression "special military operation" and means it, that person or organization is a Russian propagandist. There is a war going on. Putin and company use "special military operation" as an obvious excuse to conquer some land as if it's the 19th century or earlier. Period.
@@inisipisTV I am most amused how Russia went from supposedly being able take Ukraine in days, to now being on the defensive. Bottom line is Russia has been embarrassed on the world stage by a much smaller and poorer country.
should've seen the Russian nazis crying when they couldn't take kyiv in 3 days and how there "special military operation" turned from special to special ed
It's a shame, because in the old Soviet propaganda, they'd always use an English presenter and not an American one, though I can see why, the thing is, they also had cogent reasons to ignore American English. They also taught actual English in their schools and not the American dialect.
Love the quoting of the tank factory manager’s statement on meeting production and quality control quotas. Nothing has changed. Soviet managers were good at managing statistics, too.
*Soviet managers really knew how to manage factories, they were able to move more than 3,000 factories and about 5 million workers beyond the Urals in 1941 in a short time, and already in 1943, Soviet industry was able to break the back of the industry of the European Union, led by Nazi Germany, so draw conclusions dude, unless you're an idiot with a broken brain!*
It's time to scratch the word game change out of the military lexicon. Weapons can be revolutionary, but producing weapons that are relatively good in large quantities is better for a big war.
Yep, I unsubbed.
@@6789uiop This channel is unbiased in its reviews and this is rare.
@@palacete it’s approach the Russian troll channel it tries to be on biased to attract viewers
@@palacete that would be game changing
Germany had it's own game changer in ww2 by the name wonder weapons
I heavily doubt over 2k tanks been destroyed, what I learn is whatever ukriane and nato says take it with a grain of salt and propaganda
and russia somehow doesn’t say propaganda?? Kyiv in 3 days lmao.
Also that 2000 number includes damaged and abandoned or captured and stolen tanks, not just destroyed. Around 550 russian tanks have actually been destroyed while remaining 1500 are damaged causing them to be inoperable of some sort
Opinions don’t really matter when we have access to open source intelligence though.
@@liddz434 and what “intelligent” source is that?
Obviously you’re oblivious to anything considered remotely intelligent or discerning 😅
samr=e as ruzzian propaganda, but less heavy on the ridiculousness
T 54 and T55 are used in ukraine as an artillery support....they are placed in the rear and give support to russian troops.
They are great targets for drones too
Don't forget the leopards too! Lancet loves those
@@mrwilson7617 Nothing beats the lovestory between a Lancet drone and a Leopard-2 tank.
@@dmitrit.4862except they've only managed to kill very few and disable about the same number. The eventually, when Germany stops being incompetent and rebuilds em', they'll just be back in the field. Something that none of the piece of shit Russian tanks can pull off. 🤣
T-90Ms are actually be produced faster now than before the war that’s why they are being seen a lot now in Ukraine the production went up
* blown up*
@@LaGrandeBayou LOL. That told u pootin am I right?? Or telegram?
@@LaGrandeBayou I don’t believe ur ruzzian propaganda
@@LaGrandeBayou BINGO!
@@RustyBear Why do you call him pootin would you rather sleep with Sleepy Joe I mean Putin atleast worked out when he was in the KGB never seen a US president get baptized somethings not right you must support child trafficing because man does hollywood and DC not support the Sound of Freedom movie man wake up.
Most people today, don't realise, or have forgotten, why the Soviet Union crushed the huge western army of Hitler and all his allies. That happened soon after Stalin declared the opening of the 'Second Front' of the Red army arsenal.. a huge military industrial complex behind the Ural mountains. In it, the Soviets produced all of their superior new weapons systems...The Rocket propelled Katusha artillery, the new Mig tank killers aircraft, the new upgraded varieties of heavy Soviet tanks, and the legendary upgraded T34s...and the list goes on and on.. By the time the Germans knew what was hitting them so hard, shredding their 'invincible' army to smitherins...it was too late...the Russian Red Army had entered Germany.
That was the famous Soviet Second front ... The ability to respond and manufacture winning practical weapons in huge numbers, easy to operate in practical terms, and delivering the fire power, other countries can't produce.
Today, not much has changed...only the Russians have become masters now, of producing the most effective firepower.. No ifs..No buts...The proof is all out here, to be seen in all modern wars, up to today.
Hahaha the mass losses of Russian soldiers being sent forth like cattle haven't quite made it to you have they? Russia lost A LOT of men in the war, they didn't fight very effective, not like how the Germans fought. The "not one step back" order was issued. But yeah, if they tell you at school Russia is the no.1 superpower in the world that just happens to struggle with their "two weeks" invasion of Ukraine just believe them
Its not a war, its still a special operations. This is not the patriotic war, Putin is not Stalin, Russia is not the USSR.
The entire country is not mobilized to fight this war.
Putin is fighting this war with one of his eyes on the Russian people, and on his possible rivals,
Hey Ivan fanboy I am sorry to ripp you out of your Dreams but do you know anything about history and reality? Because because a lot of your statements are incorrect.
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 How? The largest battles in WW2 were on the eastern front. Russian and Chinese weapons are much faster and cheaper to manufacture whereas American weapons are complicated and expensive so contractors make more money.
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 The only thing he said that was incorrect, Cosplay-Castro fanboy, was his use of the term "the Russian Red Army." It was NOT "Russian," it was as much Ukrainian and Belorusian as Russian... whether you like that fact or not.
Не стоит смеяться над T-55, у него есть защита от радиации и его создавали для ведения ядерной войны. Так, что этот танк не так прост, как можно подумать.
"Т-55, имеющий противорадиационную защиту снаружи и внутри, оборудован датчиками, распознающими применение поблизости ядерного оружия. В случае их срабатывания система автоматически отключала бортовые электросети и двигатель машины, переводя ее в ожидание ударной волны. А для защиты экипажа включался сепаратор-нагнетатель, создающий избыточное давление и не пропускающий радиоактивную пыль."
Как это поможет России? 🤣
кремлебот научился копипастить.
@@alekseiruin6772хохлобот с самого детства любишь срать в комментариях
@@prosto_chilloviy677 ты не прав, кремлебот. Я за Россию. Но кремлеботы с бц Лахта-2 на ул Оптиков это такие конченные быдлы, что они обязаны ответить.
I farted an it don't stink😂
The T-62 MBT was introduced to the Soviet Army in 1961. The older T-54 and T-55 were introduced in the early Cold War years, from 1948 to 1949.
😄
and both can easily destroy bradleys and leopard 1s
They actually can 1 hit leapords lol
They're good for fire support but not on head on battle
@@RonaldoFanIndeed Any update on the conviction of Colonel Alexander Denisov who was stealing engines from T-90 tanks then sending them to Ukraine front??? He sold the engines to local Russians to be used as generators.
All tanks are useful but very vulnerable in the current modernized warfare. No tank can survive a direct hit from precision artillery, rockets & some drones that are available & used by both sides. The Russian advantage is that its MIC’s primary objective is to produce large numbers of weapons for use in the current conflict. America’s MIC’s primary objective for many decades seems to be to generate massive excessive profits. The results of these different objectives is that Russia has accumulated a huge arsenal of weapons & munitions with the ability to replenish its arsenals at a respectable rate while the Western MICs have lost their ability to do the same. The Bottomline is that greedy corruption has its consequences that cannot be quickly remedied!
If what you say is true then the MICs failed the American people.
West combines quality with quantity. Like the sherman, Sure there was slightly less sherman’s than T34 but they were way better than T34 and they had more sherman’s than german had panzers/tigers.
By the way The USA alone has 2500 ACTIVE abrams while Russia has only 2000 ACTIVE tanks including T72/T80/T90.
Russia counts inoperable broken tanks as their fleet lmao.
Otherwise I think you’re licking putins feet.
Except Tanks that are integrated with an air defense system like Russia's.
Yea Russian corruption and greed is the reason the Russian military sucks so bad.
Agree, I unsubbed. Too much propaganda and bad information here.
Doubt this is a really a "game changer": As has been reported on various western media sources, Russia has lost well over 42 million tanks in just the last 17-18 minutes, 13 billion soldiers, over 150% of their missiles are being shot down, and Ukraine will have Moscow completely surrounded before I finish writing this post.
Tell that to the dead Ukrainians
Shit, that much? Well that explains why russia haven't gained ANY of its objectives :)
Compare to the Russian government & defense mouth piece western media are more accurate & truthful. 😂😂😂
@@tombombadil8709
1) To "de-nazify" Ukraine
2) To de-militarize Ukraine
3) To stop NATO expansion
4) To sieze all of Ukraine
5) To sieze Ukraine in a few days
6) Failed to establish air dominance
7) Failed to establish beach-heads
8) Sending two non-aligned countries (Finland & Sweden) to join NATO-
etc etc - then his objectives changed to take
smaller parts of land, only to lose over 50% of the stolen land in a Ukranian blitzattack .
Ukraine is now armed more than ever and he's risking losing even Crimea thanks to his stupid tactics.
All this "being the second strongest army" and "having superior weapons".
His airforce is hiding behind the borders.
His black sea fleet having to flee its home port.
Sinking of his black sea flagship.
I (and any army) call that an utter failure. 🤣
Finally some truthful reporting.
The west said the leopards were game changing too and look what happened 😂
RUSSIAN TANKS ARE JUST A KIND OF FRYPAN
@@lutya1192 Man Leorpads tank just only tiny skinny ass cat that has been destroyed by Ka52 and minefield.
They are, however they cannot be applied in the fashion they are meant to. Multiple reasons, amongst them inadequte demimin and not enough airforce capabilities. Like using a hammer to drill holes. It wont work.
@@naufalprasetya6133At Least they didnt get destroyed by a homemade drone
@@naufalprasetya6133 u mean : got disabled by minefield. The KA-52 got destroyed by MANPADS ;)
Oryx the guy who counts unknown vehicles as Russian?The guy who don't count Lancet and ka 52 strikes? The guy who counted the same vehicle from different angles and count it as different vehicle?
is it 1 guy? i suppose its more than one but yeah... i guess they cant cheat with t90m so much because there are less of those. wonder how much fake data did they produce with more numerous tank types
The guy who puts unknown vehicles as Russian if original video or photo is from the POV of a Ukrainian strike, and it goes into Ukraine if the original is from a Russian POV. The guy who does count lancet and Ka-52 strikes, and the guy who removes duplicates using geolocation and will quickly correct any repeat that makes it through. Nice cope though
If you took the time to investigate, you'd know that every one of your allegations, is complete nonsense. Oryx has one of the absolute best methods of verification of any similar reporting, And it's not a "guy", but a team of people. They report on conflict losses all over the globe, not just in Ukraine.
They use a number of different verification techniques. But let's talk about your claims. When there are a dozen clearly identified Russian vehicles in an obvious position of a formation and one vehicle that is no longer identifiable as to what it is, whose vehicle do you think it is?? Argentinian? Of course it's Russian!!
As for double counting, multiple verification techniques are used including geolocation information, Satellite imagery, and other location related information such as historical imagery from different days and times. It's a lot more thorough than you imply.
As for what weapons systems brought about the demise of a target, that isn't so easy to identify. Someone might post a claim of credit to a Ka-52 for example, but if there is not enough to verify that, why would you just trust the claim? It is this exact same verification logic that make Oryx data reliable. They don't deal in opinions, they use what they can best verify as factual data. Can they make mistakes? Yes, but it's low probability, and that's going to happen without bias.
People much smarter than you, who have more resources available, have concluded that these guys are overall the best and most reliable. Generally, their data runs a bit behind real time because the take the efforts to verify every data point. If a T90 gets mis-identified as a T72, that's really a minor error which does not impact credibility. If the same tank that was listed as damaged later ends up as destroyed, it's going to be hard to catch that. Likewise if a Russian tank get's captured and later gets identified as a Ukrainian loss, does that corrupt the data? I don't see it that way and it's possible for both sides to have lost the same specific tank. That kind of thing is insignificant enough to have little impact on the overall database.
These organisations like the so called orix are controlled and just like UN they powerless against the US and bias
yes, Oryx has been doing this since civil war in Syria. they're not that reliable.
INDIA stands with Russia 🇷🇺 👏 👍
go buy all their junk equipment then to go with your junk military
A pajeet supporting a giant that fails it's "Special operation" miserably.
Don’t you have some telescam calls to be making…?
@@Andzrej_Polska😂😂😂 я в шоке бываю от таких заявлений 😂 Россия воюет против всего блока нато во глове с сша !! У Украины даже своих патрон не осталось !! Украина уже давно проиграла бы как минимум раз 10 !! НАТО уже пожалела что вязалась в эту войну !! Уже многоюие натовские страны воют от бессилия !! И от того что у них не осталось оружия !
Never seen a Hindu, so happy for the destruction of Europe, the ONLY group that hates Europe more than the communists, you guessed it right, Hindus!😊
I see you listed Russian losses in tanks, not Ukraine's. I think I know why.
Ukrainians have nothing to loose?😂
Russia never lost 2.000 tanks. Its source must be John Kirby, Lindsey Graham and Victoria Nuland.
They need to increase the reverse speed of all these tanks
На Т90м уже идут работы с подвеской, говорят что будет 20-30км/ч
Little did you know that all mighty russian military never retreats..they just turn around and continue to advance..so no need for better reverse xD
@@piirakkaliisa8340 Sounds like what Prigozhin did
@@piirakkaliisa8340Like in Kharkov, Kherson and now around Bakhmut after month of taking it after a year? 😂
Hehe, you better stop swallowing gov controlled western mainstream news straight down without thinking.
Russia are still only have military operation in Ukraine, as Putin said in every speech, Russia have a goal to demilitarized Ukraine completely.
And wipe out US trained soldiers and western weapons.
As Putin said after biden admits that he wanted to weakening Russia and have a regime change, it's not Ukraine who's Russia's real enemy. US are Russia's main enemy, you are aware of it's still military operation ?
Russia have not decided to declare any war against Ukraine, neither have Ukraine against Russia.
US are using Ukraine and their nato alliance trying to weakening Russia, yes.
Did you know that obama already in 2008 gave green light to start working on getting control over Ukraine ?
Jeffrey Sachs said it, he was shocked.
Because he knew US crossing Russia's red line.
Responsible politicians in Washington also knew that, it was their plan.
After US successfully had their presidential coup in Ukraine 2014.
US started training and prepare Ukrainian military for this tragic proxywar trying to weakening Russia together with sanctions.
US was confident that they would crush Russia with sanctions and kicking Russia out of SWIFT payment system.
So US blocked the world trade with Russia.
Well, sadly for US Russia of course knew what US working on and planned.
So Russia already had their own payment system without using dollar together with China bank.
So that the world freely could trade with Russia, and it's nothing US could do about it.
US failed with absolutely everything they trying to weakening Russia with.
Russia and Ukraine are the two largest bread basket countries in the world, that's why US trying to weakening Russia.
Control over the food and energy that the world needs from Russia and Ukraine.
US would managed to get control over the world 🌎
But They ending up weakening themselves dollar and Europe more.
Heard 41 new countries want to join BRICS alliance and use their new payment system without using dollar 💵
That's why responsible politicians and globalist elites are so desperate right now, what's going on geopolitical just now.
Are really serious for US, world didn't like US cynical plan using Ukraine and sanctions trying to weakening Russia.
So this tragic proxywar make US much more weaker, everything is going wrong way for US.
Jeffrey Sachs says that he is not surprised, he said US have had over 100 war's around the world since 1991.
And still threatening with economic sanctions if they don't support US interest trying to get control over Russia.
43 countries have US sanctions against just now.
biden administration are freezing themselves from the rest of the globe.
That's a fact, do some research on BRICS expansion, you understand what I am talking about.
For them not to be getting any chips they sure are building and upgrading a lot of things
That is because you do not understand the sanctions. It is impossible to fully block off russia from buying chips.
Right now russia goes out of their way to buy it through other countries.
Somewhat less quantities, higher prices. Not a total block
@@appakingggsomebody gets it. Good thing you made a point to say that before these nerds start coming up with conspiracies
@@lucasbaxter5850What's wrong with nerds? nerds are good at whatever they dedicate time to do. 😁👍🏼
Yeah it's called China and Iran
@@appakinggg
Most chips in the world are made by a company in Taiwan called TSMC.
They have a near monopoly whne it comes to the most advanced most cutting edge chips.
Probably more than 90 of the 100 most advanced chips nearest to you, we're all made in Taiwan by a company called TSMC.
They make the chips of Apple, most Androids, Nvidia, AMD, the even make some chips for Intel. Even China relies on Taiwan for advanced chips.
The chip shortage of a while ago...it was because of this one single company.
South Korea produces most of the rest of the chips.
Most military countries make their own military chips, because older manufacturing processes are more robust for military grade chips. In other words, cutting edge manufacturing is too delicate for military purposes.
When it was discovered that the US used back doors in Intel chips to spy on their own allies, everyone switched to locally made chips, if possible. Russia did this too...their government PCs use chips that's based on Intel's abandoned Itanium architecture, that they manufacture themselves.
Russian tanks are being well tested and they can continue to improve their strength and combat effectiveness. Love their tri colour paint pattern.
Exactly only proper armour they have are wood loggs 😂
@@Toulkun leopards proper armour doesn't save it from lancet lmao
They were already tested in Iraq, and they were popped like nasty zits with ease by USA. This got reinforced in Ukraine where Russian tanks are being destroyed by the thousands.
@@Toulkun So you are saying that the Ukrainians and all of NATO is so incompetent that they cannot defeat an enemy that uses wood logs as a defense.
@@Toulkunу тебя нет мозга,как ты живёшь?!😂
2137 russian loss, and 121 ukraine lost? :D :D :D :D
ridiculous....
Saying it as game changer is stretching
They didn't say nothing about game changer like the Ukrainians
In 1990th, I have seen field with approx 10k tanks on conservation, in Western Siberia - it was impressive view.
"SVO" gives a good kick to military production around world but in Russia heavy equipment factories are not demolished/outsorced like in US and EU and there is no shortage with resources and power.
There is no way someone can win direct war with Russia, only back door methods may work (perestroika, Gorbachev, etc)
I disagree the USA alone out produces Russia and 10k porly maintained peaces will not change anything in the current situation
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 these 10К tanks most likely rotted and decommissioned, but enough new ones were made. Тhe view itself was impressive - so much metal and labor! I haven't seen so many before, it is crazy. If you ever were an infantryman stuck in a field in the mud after rain (happened to me once on training), and your tank (not the enemy) is spinning nearby - you feel like a fly in honey ... a shitty feeling to be in an open place next to the tank when you can't run or jump.
@@andreiminin4738 But even then the USA and NATO still easaly outprodouce Russia + they have far more and better equipment then Russia
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Potentially, after few years, USA and NATO may produce more than Russia because they have more resource but it requires time and reasonable prices that private companies don't like. In order to be able to produce more without breaking economy, military industry should be nationalized. Can you believe that? And who knows what happens few years later - may be it will be not needed? There is no heavy facilities for Abrams in USA - last one in Detroit was demolished in 2000th; no artillery for tanks - Germany produced it.
It seems that most western counties moved to post modern, post industrial life style and all real business (engineering, industry) outsourced.
The best business now is 1) cut energy and resources supplies from Russia to Europe and squeeze money from Europe by selling gas to it 2) sell old military equipment and ammunition instead of utilization - probably it explains why and how it goes as it goes.
And the last - no one wants real big war with nuclear heads - so it is just a business. While political situation is stable in Russia, there is no military option to win. Poor Ukrainians - they are just dying for someone's business.
2:40 - "According to Oryx..." Folks, I checked out Oryx early in the war, and saw how hilariously low their standard of proof is. I randomly clicked on about 100 instances of claimed destroyed ("confirmed") tanks, an at least 30% of them could be dismissed as fake straight up. Reasons : not identifiable as either Russian or Ukrainian; not identifiable as being in the current war at all (could be from Yugoslavia or Armenia or some such); not identifiable as being in any way damaged, merely a picture of a tank in the distance...! It baffles me that sensible people are still treating it as an authoritative source !!
Not to mention that its open-intel, can be redacted by anyone
@bobbman3000
1 second ago
Can you find me a single entry in that list for a tank entry that is incorrect? Just one singular entry. You'll probably find one (it is impossible to be perfect when counting THAT many losses), but the time it would take for you to do that should help you realize.
Oryx obviously has it's issues, but it's still a great source. WarSpotting is better though. They are much more thorough, it's regularly updated, and it's easier to sort stuff.
I've got a better idea : YOU take it upon YOURSELF to go trawling through those thousands of entries WITH AN OPEN, ENQUIRING MIND, at all times asking yourself "could this here tank in the distance be actually UNDAMAGED and INTACT ?" or "could this tank here be actually photographed before 2022?" or "could this plain green APC with no insignia in the distance belong to the other side?" You will find many like this. @@ImBigFloppa
Россия решит все проблемы.
a force shield that could defeat all kinetic rounds or missiles would be "game changing" not a mere upgrade.
I'm surprised this channel hasn't already announced it, along with phasers and warp drive.
Ukraine lost all its tanks, then all the tanks that Poland handed over to it, then lost almost all tanks from the Czech Republic, Germany, Britain... Now Ukraine is again asking for weapons, which will also lose.
Sounds like Russia's MOD commercial
Those tanks were made for export. All they did was cancel the export and send them to Ukraine.
Ukraine lost zero tanks since the start of the war according to oryx
That´s why they beg for old scrap all over the World...
According to Oryx based on photo evidence Ukraine lost 600 tanks in total and 400 tanks destroyed. So your figure is not correct!
At the same time the Russian losses were 2173 tanks of which 1389 were total loss. Probably the russian losses are over 3000 by now, and they are bringing more ever older tanks!
Also these losses are minimum that can be documented, so the losses are bigger.
The funny thing is that there have been big celebrations by the russians that they knocked out 7-8 Leopard tanks, 2 total loss, rest be repaired, but they dont realize that at least 3000 russian tanks have been destroyed, by comparison. So after russian logic the russain tanks are better then the western tanks! Funny!
or how Russia is begging North Korea for artillery or Iran for drones or china for ceramic and other parts
@@milangacik994
😅😅
I do not know how many tanks the Ukrainians have actually lost - it is larger that the 0 value you attribute to Oryx. Spending 30 seconds with google, this is what I found wrt Ukrainian tank losses according to Oryx:
* 4 Leopard 2A4: (1, destroyed) (1, damaged) (2, damaged) (3, damaged)
* 7 Leopard 2A6: (1, destroyed) (2, destroyed) (1, damaged) (2, damaged) (3, damaged) (4, damaged) (1, damaged and abandoned)
* 36 Unknown tank: (1, destroyed) (2, destroyed) (3, destroyed) (4, destroyed) (5, destroyed) (6, destroyed) (7, destroyed) (8, destroyed) (9, destroyed) (10 and 11, destroyed) (12, destroyed) (13, destroyed) (14, destroyed) (15, destroyed) (16, destroyed) (17, destroyed) (18, destroyed) (19, destroyed) (20, destroyed) (21, destroyed) (22, destroyed) (23, destroyed) (24, destroyed) (25, destroyed) (26, destroyed) (27, destroyed) (28, destroyed) (29, destroyed) (30, destroyed) (31, destroyed) (32, destroyed) (33, destroyed) (34, destroyed) (35, destroyed) (1, damaged)
Oh, more Upgraded Tanks for Ukraine?
Tractors at the ready for recovery 💪
Definitely didnt destroyed 2100 tanks:D they havent even deployed this much ammount of tanks since the start of the SMO:D propaganda as always.
Ukrainians have learned to use Javelin missiles very effectively…but now they’ve figured out that a drone carrying an improvised tandem charges to the engine decks actually disables the tank. Does not destroy the tank…but enough damage for the crews to abandon it. A Javelin costs about USD$80k…an improvised kamikaze drone costs about $700. Wow…
Soooo were the armada at?
An upgraded tank isn't going to change a thing, if they don't change their tactics and doctrine then these tanks will be lost too
Their tactics are fine, and their doctrine. THis is not hearts of iron 4 btw. This is reality. The problem is the western digitalized totalitarian dictatorships sending all their equipment to a foreign country which has a insane corruption problem and isnt even in nato. They also fund neo nazis in their own army. Thats the problem.
Without infatry to support the tanks, it does not matter how advanced the armored vehicles are, all are easy to destroy with the proper anti-tank weapons. Also if the numbers about the lost and captured tanks are correct, it will take a lot of time to replenish the fleet and it's far more cost effective to produce and use a Javelin for instance. In summary, Russia won't change the status quo with doubling their production.
The numbers are wrong, we got video evidence of 5-30 tank Ukraine tanks destroyed by artillery, mines, Lancet drones, Ka-52 attack helicopters, MLRS missile barrages daily (nowadays they use again more tanks in the South, 80% are destroyed in these assaults) . Naturally the true loss is minimum twice, not everything recorded and showed.
Infantry causes less than 5%. Ukraine uses Artillery and drones mainly from distance, not Anti tank infantry.
@@MolnarG007 if Ukraine was loosing equipment so hard,why isn't Russia in Kiev yet?
@@DeepSlice I live in NATO cou try but yes they sacrificed 40% of received Western armoured vehicles and tanks to press through. As i wrote minefield, missile barrages and complete air control is against them.
The question how much they gain for this sacrifice.
The attacker also always have bigger loses even when same artillery, air support present.
The question isn't the equipment, it's manpower.
Russia bigger, so they can use only contracted troops and volunteers, and using conscipts only in Russia for support transport, defense, etc. They get 1000 volunteers for money daily. Ukraine uses conscipts, 18-60, and those ready to do their duty are long joined. It's super bad that only those they must conscipt by force left, using vans, getting people from market, streets. I understand they must, but this show they are running out of men. Having losses 1 to 1 isn't enough, Russia got 4x numbers.
This also proves their bravery.
@@DeepSlice Do everyone with a functioning brain a favor, go to the closest bathroom, look in the mirror and promptly slap yourself.
The supply of US ATGMs is drying up. Not just for Ukraine, for everyone. The production lines literally have to be spun back up and that doesn't happen over night.
Yes but how many of each tanks are being made each year now?
The fact that you believe oryx is saddest part of whole video.
a source that has the evidence to back it up like Russia they would say they destroyed 100 himars and u believe that but when actual video evidence comes to light and how bad Russia is losing u say oryx is fake my guy please before u speak try not make yourself look like a total dumbass btw the russian nazis have lost over 11,000 tanks while Ukraine has only lost 3,900 and thats confirmable by video and photo proof.
And you believe the news and ukrainioid propaganda lol ... The ukrainioids are losing badly...
Believing the most reliable resource on vehicle losses by far is sad? Should the Kremlin be believed? Should the Ukrainian government be believed?
@@ImBigFloppa who called it reliable? The MSM from the west. There is no consensus that oryx is correct. Only western sources. Quote oryx because it fits their narrative. Multiple different forums have found highly questionable data on the site.
Like they captured 500+ tanks yet they still had no tanks to do an offensive? That would seem odd, they should have an abundance of extra tanks or all those tanks have been destroyed. Ukraine literally said they were out tanks and had to wait for tanks from western colonizers because they had so few. Where is oryx data on those 500+ tanks that seem to be unaccounted for.
@@ImBigFloppa
это тот самый орикс который
русский танк получил царапину : оу , русский танк уничтожен
украинский танк разлетелся на куски : его отремонтируют и вернут в строй
ну как такому не верить )))
Can it protect itself from Lancet type drones?
the only lancet type drones Ukraine supposedly has is the switchblade 600 and we haven't seen much of them
T-90M shids all over Abrams and Leopards
In your Dreams maby reality is different as the war in Ukraine shows
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 10 later this didnt age well lmao western tanks are garbage
Don’t care what they say the experts. The T90 M is a decent concept made for the grounds and tactics of eastern europe
The t90 is just a renamed t72 and it is just as bad as it 💩🚽
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1you have no clue what are you talking about. You just said that Abrams is crappy tank: heavy, not great armor for that weight, fuel thirsty, all that with outdated 105mm gun.
@@BojanPeric-kq9et wrong comment section?
It's about the t 90 and t72 not the abrams
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1I just paraphrased what you wrote about T-90 to American lingo.
@@BojanPeric-kq9et t90 and t72 were good for there time but that time has long been over
And modernisation is very hard because of Russian corruption
😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃The Russian army had about 3500 tanks in service in 2021, according to that nonsense they lost about 2100 tanks in Ukraine, considering the number of deployed units that never exceeded 50% of the Russian forces, that is about 1750 tanks, so they lost more than they should have. Super logical and verified messages. Just as true as the T-55, T-62 tanks are from the 1940s. Find objective information or don't make videos.
Приложи к башке мокрое полотенчико.
@@Slava_Mitrofanov Логика не твоя сильная сторона
@@radekslar3576Логика? Откуда у тебя сведения о 2100 уничтоженных российский танков? Это тебе сказали те же самые люди которые тебе обещали европейские зарплаты после майдана? И ты опять им веришь?
Ответь лучше на простой вопрос. У Украины было около 3000 советских танков на 2021 год. Залужный попросил 600 иностранных танков для контрнаступа. Вопрос: зачем ему эти танки если есть 3000 советских? Куда они делись? Сгорели на поле боя, да?
Вы неправильно прочитали мой комментарий. Я, наоборот, насмехаюсь над информацией о тысячах уничтоженных русских танков. Я пишу, что в том видео есть сообщение о большем количестве уничтоженных танков, чем развернутых русскими.
@@radekslar3576
Тогда извините за невнимательность 👍
Alot of vague information about the upgraded Tanks until 5:36 where the video finally lists the specific upgrades.
The main reason that Russia did lost this bulk of MBT's is old expired tactics of sovietic era, and also second being the traning of the crew on there tech; the part with bad quality parts, it can be found in any military tech, because is all about $$$$$
No, that is maybe 3rd reason. You totally missed main reason.
What happened to the ground breaking T-14? Russia has had problems with production an they stated they were making 60 new units per month. Overhauling older models is time consuming and didn’t address the inherent problems of the self loading system and stowage of live ammunition in the turret and floor. Last week the Ukrainians destroyed the plant that manufactures electro-optical systems for all Russian tanks as well as being cut off from cut off from importing Swedish and French fire control systems, computer chips for engines and other electronics! Wonder if this is a face saving propaganda report minimizing the failure of Russia’s armor designs. Ukraine has reduced the Russian Ka-52 Alligator fleet by an estimated 25%of Russias total machines. With 25% losses I’m sure crews aren’t overly excited to man these machines. Where is the Su-57 Felon Russia’s world beating 4.5th generation fighter. India walked away from buying and manufacturing the fighter as it did not meet it’s specifications or role. Basically Russia lost the cash to make India’s and their own planes from the profits. There are no other buyers so far. The war has hurt Russia’s military sales and reputation with its massive equipment loses in Ukraine to Western equipment. This is not good as the military sales finances the Russian military.
Russians lost 500 tanks in first day of Kursk battle. Germans lost less, but could not keep up with Russian productivity so as stamina. Now it is even worse for NATO. They have nothing to offer.
USSR not Russia.
@@hisvinyes Russia is not USSR but Russia inherited almost everything of USSR
@@AaronC123-q9t Entire West now is weaker than Germany then during WWII. Germany was ruling almost entire Europe BTW... West is nto finances, Russia into units. War is about units not about finances.
@@gostan2718 Inherited nothing...Have half the population, USSR has so I don't see what you're argument is.
Corruption? Yes, it's top notch in Russia.
Socialism? Nope, it's a capitalist state with a great gaps between the poors and the richs.
So please explain?
@@AaronC123-q9tIf we check the numbers of equipment/soldiers we need 1.5 more germany to have more than the modern day numbers. Most NATO countries did not spent much money on their army in the past years..
2000+ танков потеряли ? а че так мало, написали бы сразу 20000 или лучше 200000
Supposedly russia has built 120 T90ms since last February. Does anyone know if the new models have sosna u?
All new Russian tanks are equipped with a domestically-produced sight which the media calls a Sosna-U copy. Sosna-U is Belarusian, by the way.
The channel RedEffect has a very interesting video analysing the production rate of T-90Ms, you should check it out. It's called something along the lines of "T-90M performance in Ukraine"
Even if it's cutting-edge, how long would it take for the crew to master it? Not to mention many strikes happen due to the lack of countermeasures being taken to prevent it since most of the personnel weren't trained that well.
there is arena s soft kill which no longer uses shtora jammers, it uses aerosol ammunition (basically very advanced smoke launchers) and a Russian tank is easier to get used to than a western one iirc
They recieve months of training on the T-90Ms on top of their years of experience with T-72B3Ms/T-80BVMs/T-90As.
Russia has an elite and experienced tank crews unlike ukraine
@@definitelyfrank9341 Who does?
That Ukrainian offensive has already failed miserably so your a bit behind the curve.
They should make invisible tank
I imagine the tankists just floating in the air while riding it lol
I love tanks tank but the truth is no tank is invisible , history make that very clear. But i adore the Russians approach on tank manufacturing. Cheap and efficient, easily used and repair and able to large scale manufacturing.
This is very logical
Actually T14 Armata has Anti Thermal paint that makes it invisible to Thermal Equipments
@@dulithasiriwardana8724Very logical if it works. Russia couldn't and still can't build a decent car. But now a new tank. Whatever.
Maybe they have but nobody has seen it lol 😅
OK NOW TELL US, HOW MANY TANKS HAVE THE GERMANS, ENGLISH AND AMERICANS LOST?
Помню они говорили что леопарды изменят ход войны, а что мы видим что относительно слабый против бронированных танков дрон ланцет легко проходит броню леопард 2а6, а против старых т72/64 он не мог 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Do they have the manpower to man them, and the logistics to support them in the field, and the skill to deploy them to there best.
Russia never deployed 2000+ tanks in Ukraine, IF that happens, it will ALL over in one week. Whole Europe would be over run.
😅
Nice delusions you have there😉
One can't but help wonder, with Ukraine not being able to target Russian production capability, how much longer in time will this war last?
To the last Ukrainian. According to Western hosts
Doesn’t matter cause they’re still gonna turn into an inferno when they’re hit by a javelin or suicide drone
So are the western tanks just the way it is really
@@00shakz12Western tanks are far more advanced ofc because west is more technolicaly advance and Russia doesnt produce any of own components. Western tanks are usually not lost only tracks get destroyed which can be repaired and thats what happend with Leopards in Zaporozia and it was due to heavy mine fields and artillery strikes. Meanwhile first T 90 was lost around Kharkiv year ago 😂
@@Toulkun oh shut up there are loads of vids of western tanks burning,if they why are Ukraine begging more tanks lol work it out.....
@@Toulkun Russia produces all of it's own components idiot.
@@Toulkun🥱🤦♂️
I see recent new stories about Russia almost out of tanks? Whats the deal with that? Tank shortage?
Russia has multiple diffrent tanks. America has 1. To do everything. Russia has a weapon for every job. Every enviroment every confl
I don't think this guy understand warfare and logistics
Russia only has 2…T-72BM/T-90 and T-80…but T-80 is only used as reserve and taken out of the mainline after Chechnya disaster. US has M1 Abrams series (A1, A2, A2 SEP, A2 SEPV3/4 etc). Each nation has different military doctrines - and the US knows what they are doing.
кремлебот научился пользоваться гугл транслейт.
Нет своего оборудования и мозгов чтобы собирать свою украинскую технику..Даже свои гривны в Канаде производят .позорище.
Who do you work for, RuZFed? 🤣
Russia did not lose anywhere near that many tanks. Or x s has bad methodologies and is biased.
Forget T-62 & T-55 that Russia use as Howitzers and Kamikaze Tanks. Ukraine sent Slovanian T-55 at the front line and 2 reportedly got Destroyed 😅
I am very interested, how in your imagination happens capture of Russian tanks by Ukrainians?
You forgot to mention that Russian tanks are not built and sent to various countries on behalf of tax payers money, unlike the ones in America 😊
The money is from Russian people's bank accounts 😂😂😂😂
Lmaooo what tf does that have to do with it😂
unfortunately you have the wrong pictures from the latest T-72B3M. The never versions hav much more reactive armor.also the T-90M3 has changed sind the Ukrainian Conflict. And by the way, Oryx is biased towards the west.
Oryx is neutral Ivan
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Hahahh good one пиндос!
The Russian are brilliant fighters they are the top in chess
If the Russians are so brilliant, then why did several backhoes, some dynamite, and some shoulder mounted rockets stop them at Kiev's suburbs?
Also, the current top Chess Grandmaster is Magnus Carlsen, who is from Norway. The top Russian is ranked fifth.
@@dougstong5723 or the fact that Wagner has been a better fighting force than Russias actual army
@@lucasbaxter5850 Yes, it takes real bravery to send Russian convicts (with little training) in waves to assault entrenched Ukrainian troops.
@@dougstong5723 я правильно понимаю , что мясо из заключенных разбили в бахмуте элитную украинскую армию обученную экспертами из НАТО с поддержкой всего мира и лучшим оружием ? вы же понимаете , что такие утверждения больше унижают украинцев чем русских )))
Каждый раз когда вы говорите "русские воюют лопатами" задумайтесь почему они ебут вас даже лопатами и почему зеленский до сих пор не кататься на абрамсе по красной площади если у русских всё так плохо
Tanks are useless in this war anyways, I mean you've got mines, RPG's, Drones, TOW's, artillery etc. I'm sure there's a lot more.
T90M Proryv is derived from T72…? WTF...
Losing 4100 tanks I can imagine they need a new design :)
AT LEAST 4100 tanks. Shit, they were filling older cold war tanks with explosives and jihading them at UA forces. It's way more than 4100
Sure, a lie is still a lie no matter how many times one keeps repeating it, doesn't make it the truth, Ukraine has not even breach Russian defences, and down to only reserves whatever will they do.
Believing that they lost this number I can imagine you need a new news source.
Ukraine just added their lost tanks to Russia 😂
@@BoogsMcNoogs Probably, ~4100 taken out of action verified on Oryx..
just don't understand why no top AA?
Oryx is like a old fisherman telling a story about how he catch the biggest fish. Russia lost some tanks but not in this overrated numbers 💥💣 and dont forget that Ukraine did has the largest post soviet armor. That the needed western armor is enough to make your own conclusions. T-55's are used as a fixed mobile howitzer in second line as support. We didn't see them in the frontline and no need. Russia has a shitload of t72, t80, t90 and they come fast (upgraded) out the factory. And Russia isn't yet in full war modus.
Nice cope 🤣🤣🤣🤣
At least try to make your propaganda believable
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 hear hear, its our believer of Ghost of Kyiv 🙄
@@majidb6266 Yeah he could be real but I don't know for a fact he's real (but I doubt it's a lie )
Ok. This was supposed to be the third "game changer" in a row. Could the propaganda media buy a creativity game changer, please?
I saw someone commented that how many tank does Russia produce and how many did Ukraine destroyed in a single day.
After Leo 2 destroyed they don't appear again.
I just invited them to comment.
No new tank will make a difference , T34 , T50 and those old Tanks will make a difference . These new tanks will be commanders for critical push and strategic operation , but for maintaining the battle line the old tanks will do . Tank is a Tank , AK 47 still works . of ocurse Russia has to upgrade , not because they need it for Ukraine , but because they need to sell it . This is why they made it , to keep up . Not becase they need it , they dont need it for Ukraine , its an Urban warfare , Drones , artillery and Air power supporting troops on the ground , simple as that . Simple is good .
I’m glad both sides improving their tanks
Wholesome comment lol
I was enjoying the video till it reached the propaganda objective of which it was made. If Russians lost/abandoned 3k tanks I can safely say I'm the king of England😂😂😂
God bless Russia.
No got bless Ukraine and condem the Russian government for there crimes
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1это например какие «преступления»?
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1what crimes? Invading sovereign country?
T90M Proryv is the best tank. Like T34 in WW2. Now is the newest Proryv3.
Is this a joke
@@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1это твой мозг - шутка
But UKRAINE also approves !!....
nato allies need to destroy that tank factory. and missile factories.
cope more
and your country will be vaporized few mins later
You know what the "U" in "Uralvagonzavod" is? Ural? You know where the Ural mountains are? Yeah, an ICBM will travel so far, going to end civilisation that way?
I thought the Russians were stupid and just produce crap, why would you enter ww3 to destroy a garbage factor Mr. NPC?
ah yes, and start ww3, very good idea.
current Russia has been beyond tolerant of nato aggression so far, despite constant provocation by Urkaine. Even after the assassination attempt via drone, Russia has been beyond calm.
Without the parts formerly obtained from outside Russia the real world production and capabilities will be substantially hindered.
Do you really think that Russia didn't "decouple" since 2014 and even before?
Who cares if it's updated. A javelin missile or sort like can blow up the turret with ease. The tank shells are stored below the crew, not in a separate compartment.
Actually most ammunition detonation occurs not in the corusel it occurs in the turret because there is ammo in the turret for the T-72 this is why alot of the times T-80 crews don't experience the exposive effect as much as in such this is a cope comment the AMX-10RC was destroyed and killed all crew from 1 artillery round that did not land on the vehicle only near it this is from a ukrainian battalion personal. The T-90M did fix this issue with having sperate compartment in the Turret. Because saying that the courosel will ignite alot is like saying any sherman will because its on the floor the ammunition its the best place to put it at with sacrafising crew comfort. Most chances that shrapnel get to the bottom of the tank is pretty low especially if its top attack aummunition that is programmed to his center mass on tanks anyway. It kills crew but any tank would suffer that fate. Seen as with leopards being striked with artillery.
3:11 bro why r u lying
Good news for the Russians. If you believe this Ukraine now has ordered another 5000 javelin and Nlaw missiles.😳😀
and no canon fodder to use them. they will end in Syria lol
There are 500k drones waiting for them 😂😂🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪💪
Well, if you want them to be operated by children, okay NPC, because the west and the Ukrainian government it's been very serious about fighting to the last ukrainian.
Yeah right so many game changer western equipment fucked up by a rusty shovel
Una cosa es pedirlos y otra que te los entreguen a tiempo.
Ucrania puede pedir todo lo que quiera pero no depende de ellos la capacidad de producción.
Урал вагон завод вышел на военные рельсы. 3000 танков в год только новых. Это трехсменная работа.
T-55 was build for nuclear war
T54 and T64 are not from the 40s.
The first T-54 prototype was built in 1945 and the first production unit entered service in 1948
New targetpractice for Bayraktar :)
Anyone believing the figures coming from Oryx urgently needs to have his head examined.
Not only is Oryx far from impartial, but also proven to fudge the numbers by counting the same tank photographed from different angles as separate tanks and not making the distinction between Ukrainian and Russian tanks.
More candidates to apply for the World Turret Launch World Championship... Although they arrive high, they have not yet managed to put any into orbit... But with Russian teNAZIty they surely succeed.
That's the same thing the N@zi said about the US Sherman tank. Ironic isn't it.
@@inisipisTV Difference is that there is absolutely zero validity to the claim that the Sherman tossed it turret any more than any other tank. In fact, battlefield reports and first hand reports both show that the Sherman was (by a pretty wide margin) the safest tank to be in.
@@ImBigFloppaAnd not only was sherman safe, it was also the most reliable and versatile tank. You could do anything to the chassis like slap a bigger gun (105 mm variant) aid in mine warfare etc.
It combined quality with quantity which the russians and germans both lacked. 50,000 produced sherman’s would win against 65,000 produced t34s.
@@ImBigFloppaof course it was safe when it was used mostly near the end of the war.
did he really said t60 are from1940s ?
Russian Tanks are really beautiful. Its sad it was build for destruction.
Эти танки построены для защиты
They are built for defense, unlike NATO tanks.
This sounds hella lot like a typical russian propaganda. Even avoiding phrase like "war" and instead using "special military operation".
Using Oryx as a source of info?
@@vulgarisopinio if anyone outside Russia uses the expression "special military operation" and means it, that person or organization is a Russian propagandist. There is a war going on. Putin and company use "special military operation" as an obvious excuse to conquer some land as if it's the 19th century or earlier. Period.
Game Changing? did Ukraine Surrendered so far?
Latest news, they are now.
@@inisipisTV I am most amused how Russia went from supposedly being able take Ukraine in days, to now being on the defensive. Bottom line is Russia has been embarrassed on the world stage by a much smaller and poorer country.
Modernisation does not mean giving it a fresh paint
So many Nato soy boys crying here
Это ципсошники чубатые
should've seen the Russian nazis crying when they couldn't take kyiv in 3 days and how there "special military operation" turned from special to special ed
It's a shame, because in the old Soviet propaganda, they'd always use an English presenter and not an American one, though I can see why, the thing is, they also had cogent reasons to ignore American English. They also taught actual English in their schools and not the American dialect.
Love the quoting of the tank factory manager’s statement on meeting production and quality control quotas. Nothing has changed. Soviet managers were good at managing statistics, too.
"Managing statistics" - ie lying......
*Soviet managers really knew how to manage factories, they were able to move more than 3,000 factories and about 5 million workers beyond the Urals in 1941 in a short time, and already in 1943, Soviet industry was able to break the back of the industry of the European Union, led by Nazi Germany, so draw conclusions dude, unless you're an idiot with a broken brain!*
US managers are good at "price control", that is paying common coffee machine like it is built from titanium.
If you are right with your report then Ukraine won't be asking for more military aid. The reality in the ground doesn't coincide with this video.
game changing like leopard 2
Oryx is not open source lol. Look at their base and funding 😂