Russian Forces Receive a Game Changing Arsenal of Upgraded Tanks

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 дек 2024

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @palacete
    @palacete Год назад +200

    It's time to scratch the word game change out of the military lexicon. Weapons can be revolutionary, but producing weapons that are relatively good in large quantities is better for a big war.

    • @6789uiop
      @6789uiop Год назад +3

      Yep, I unsubbed.

    • @palacete
      @palacete Год назад +10

      @@6789uiop This channel is unbiased in its reviews and this is rare.

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 Год назад +1

      @@palacete it’s approach the Russian troll channel it tries to be on biased to attract viewers

    • @6789uiop
      @6789uiop Год назад +1

      @@palacete that would be game changing

    • @icemanzw
      @icemanzw Год назад +2

      Germany had it's own game changer in ww2 by the name wonder weapons

  • @danielm5551
    @danielm5551 Год назад +391

    I heavily doubt over 2k tanks been destroyed, what I learn is whatever ukriane and nato says take it with a grain of salt and propaganda

    • @aimxdy8680
      @aimxdy8680 Год назад +53

      and russia somehow doesn’t say propaganda?? Kyiv in 3 days lmao.
      Also that 2000 number includes damaged and abandoned or captured and stolen tanks, not just destroyed. Around 550 russian tanks have actually been destroyed while remaining 1500 are damaged causing them to be inoperable of some sort

    • @liddz434
      @liddz434 Год назад +15

      Opinions don’t really matter when we have access to open source intelligence though.

    • @danielm5551
      @danielm5551 Год назад +34

      @@liddz434 and what “intelligent” source is that?

    • @gregheitland4392
      @gregheitland4392 Год назад

      Obviously you’re oblivious to anything considered remotely intelligent or discerning 😅

    • @bikechainmic
      @bikechainmic Год назад +6

      samr=e as ruzzian propaganda, but less heavy on the ridiculousness

  • @divisionnordland1609
    @divisionnordland1609 Год назад +58

    T 54 and T55 are used in ukraine as an artillery support....they are placed in the rear and give support to russian troops.

    • @mrwilson7617
      @mrwilson7617 Год назад +1

      They are great targets for drones too

    • @DZ-qj5br
      @DZ-qj5br Год назад +4

      Don't forget the leopards too! Lancet loves those

    • @dmitrit.4862
      @dmitrit.4862 Год назад +4

      ​@@mrwilson7617 Nothing beats the lovestory between a Lancet drone and a Leopard-2 tank.

    • @ThrashingCode
      @ThrashingCode 11 месяцев назад

      @@dmitrit.4862except they've only managed to kill very few and disable about the same number. The eventually, when Germany stops being incompetent and rebuilds em', they'll just be back in the field. Something that none of the piece of shit Russian tanks can pull off. 🤣

  • @Unruly6ixx
    @Unruly6ixx Год назад +155

    T-90Ms are actually be produced faster now than before the war that’s why they are being seen a lot now in Ukraine the production went up

    • @RustyBear
      @RustyBear Год назад +14

      * blown up*

    • @RustyBear
      @RustyBear Год назад +5

      @@LaGrandeBayou LOL. That told u pootin am I right?? Or telegram?

    • @RustyBear
      @RustyBear Год назад

      @@LaGrandeBayou I don’t believe ur ruzzian propaganda

    • @Ali-hu8jr
      @Ali-hu8jr Год назад +5

      @@LaGrandeBayou BINGO!

    • @alpejohnson491
      @alpejohnson491 Год назад

      @@RustyBear Why do you call him pootin would you rather sleep with Sleepy Joe I mean Putin atleast worked out when he was in the KGB never seen a US president get baptized somethings not right you must support child trafficing because man does hollywood and DC not support the Sound of Freedom movie man wake up.

  • @rosszografov614
    @rosszografov614 Год назад +67

    Most people today, don't realise, or have forgotten, why the Soviet Union crushed the huge western army of Hitler and all his allies. That happened soon after Stalin declared the opening of the 'Second Front' of the Red army arsenal.. a huge military industrial complex behind the Ural mountains. In it, the Soviets produced all of their superior new weapons systems...The Rocket propelled Katusha artillery, the new Mig tank killers aircraft, the new upgraded varieties of heavy Soviet tanks, and the legendary upgraded T34s...and the list goes on and on.. By the time the Germans knew what was hitting them so hard, shredding their 'invincible' army to smitherins...it was too late...the Russian Red Army had entered Germany.
    That was the famous Soviet Second front ... The ability to respond and manufacture winning practical weapons in huge numbers, easy to operate in practical terms, and delivering the fire power, other countries can't produce.
    Today, not much has changed...only the Russians have become masters now, of producing the most effective firepower.. No ifs..No buts...The proof is all out here, to be seen in all modern wars, up to today.

    • @aighti
      @aighti Год назад

      Hahaha the mass losses of Russian soldiers being sent forth like cattle haven't quite made it to you have they? Russia lost A LOT of men in the war, they didn't fight very effective, not like how the Germans fought. The "not one step back" order was issued. But yeah, if they tell you at school Russia is the no.1 superpower in the world that just happens to struggle with their "two weeks" invasion of Ukraine just believe them

    • @tonycavanagh1929
      @tonycavanagh1929 Год назад

      Its not a war, its still a special operations. This is not the patriotic war, Putin is not Stalin, Russia is not the USSR.
      The entire country is not mobilized to fight this war.
      Putin is fighting this war with one of his eyes on the Russian people, and on his possible rivals,

    • @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1
      @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Год назад +10

      Hey Ivan fanboy I am sorry to ripp you out of your Dreams but do you know anything about history and reality? Because because a lot of your statements are incorrect.

    • @judlavault
      @judlavault Год назад +10

      @@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 How? The largest battles in WW2 were on the eastern front. Russian and Chinese weapons are much faster and cheaper to manufacture whereas American weapons are complicated and expensive so contractors make more money.

    • @TomasFunes-rt8rd
      @TomasFunes-rt8rd Год назад +7

      @@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 The only thing he said that was incorrect, Cosplay-Castro fanboy, was his use of the term "the Russian Red Army." It was NOT "Russian," it was as much Ukrainian and Belorusian as Russian... whether you like that fact or not.

  • @ULTRAWEN7
    @ULTRAWEN7 Год назад +34

    Не стоит смеяться над T-55, у него есть защита от радиации и его создавали для ведения ядерной войны. Так, что этот танк не так прост, как можно подумать.
    "Т-55, имеющий противорадиационную защиту снаружи и внутри, оборудован датчиками, распознающими применение поблизости ядерного оружия. В случае их срабатывания система автоматически отключала бортовые электросети и двигатель машины, переводя ее в ожидание ударной волны. А для защиты экипажа включался сепаратор-нагнетатель, создающий избыточное давление и не пропускающий радиоактивную пыль."

    • @jhint1929
      @jhint1929 Год назад +4

      Как это поможет России? 🤣

    • @alekseiruin6772
      @alekseiruin6772 Год назад

      кремлебот научился копипастить.

    • @prosto_chilloviy677
      @prosto_chilloviy677 Год назад

      ​@@alekseiruin6772хохлобот с самого детства любишь срать в комментариях

    • @alekseiruin6772
      @alekseiruin6772 Год назад

      @@prosto_chilloviy677 ты не прав, кремлебот. Я за Россию. Но кремлеботы с бц Лахта-2 на ул Оптиков это такие конченные быдлы, что они обязаны ответить.

    • @Surri5809
      @Surri5809 11 месяцев назад

      I farted an it don't stink😂

  • @fightingfalcon1986
    @fightingfalcon1986 Год назад +125

    The T-62 MBT was introduced to the Soviet Army in 1961. The older T-54 and T-55 were introduced in the early Cold War years, from 1948 to 1949.

    • @dnguyen3941
      @dnguyen3941 Год назад

      😄

    • @Awaken2067833758
      @Awaken2067833758 Год назад +31

      and both can easily destroy bradleys and leopard 1s

    • @RonaldoFanIndeed
      @RonaldoFanIndeed Год назад +18

      They actually can 1 hit leapords lol

    • @heneraldodzz4978
      @heneraldodzz4978 Год назад +13

      They're good for fire support but not on head on battle

    • @kenpatterson2948
      @kenpatterson2948 Год назад

      @@RonaldoFanIndeed Any update on the conviction of Colonel Alexander Denisov who was stealing engines from T-90 tanks then sending them to Ukraine front??? He sold the engines to local Russians to be used as generators.

  • @jimmytakayesu2987
    @jimmytakayesu2987 Год назад +69

    All tanks are useful but very vulnerable in the current modernized warfare. No tank can survive a direct hit from precision artillery, rockets & some drones that are available & used by both sides. The Russian advantage is that its MIC’s primary objective is to produce large numbers of weapons for use in the current conflict. America’s MIC’s primary objective for many decades seems to be to generate massive excessive profits. The results of these different objectives is that Russia has accumulated a huge arsenal of weapons & munitions with the ability to replenish its arsenals at a respectable rate while the Western MICs have lost their ability to do the same. The Bottomline is that greedy corruption has its consequences that cannot be quickly remedied!

    • @JoeRiollano
      @JoeRiollano Год назад

      If what you say is true then the MICs failed the American people.

    • @aimxdy8680
      @aimxdy8680 Год назад +7

      West combines quality with quantity. Like the sherman, Sure there was slightly less sherman’s than T34 but they were way better than T34 and they had more sherman’s than german had panzers/tigers.
      By the way The USA alone has 2500 ACTIVE abrams while Russia has only 2000 ACTIVE tanks including T72/T80/T90.
      Russia counts inoperable broken tanks as their fleet lmao.
      Otherwise I think you’re licking putins feet.

    • @eastafrika728
      @eastafrika728 Год назад +3

      Except Tanks that are integrated with an air defense system like Russia's.

    • @stevegolofaro9467
      @stevegolofaro9467 Год назад +1

      Yea Russian corruption and greed is the reason the Russian military sucks so bad.

    • @6789uiop
      @6789uiop Год назад +3

      Agree, I unsubbed. Too much propaganda and bad information here.

  • @tombombadil8709
    @tombombadil8709 Год назад +62

    Doubt this is a really a "game changer": As has been reported on various western media sources, Russia has lost well over 42 million tanks in just the last 17-18 minutes, 13 billion soldiers, over 150% of their missiles are being shot down, and Ukraine will have Moscow completely surrounded before I finish writing this post.

    • @Donkeymaster9000
      @Donkeymaster9000 Год назад +6

      Tell that to the dead Ukrainians

    • @FXGreggan.
      @FXGreggan. Год назад +7

      Shit, that much? Well that explains why russia haven't gained ANY of its objectives :)

    • @LCM-sq4pw
      @LCM-sq4pw Год назад

      Compare to the Russian government & defense mouth piece western media are more accurate & truthful. 😂😂😂

    • @FXGreggan.
      @FXGreggan. Год назад +1

      @@tombombadil8709
      1) To "de-nazify" Ukraine
      2) To de-militarize Ukraine
      3) To stop NATO expansion
      4) To sieze all of Ukraine
      5) To sieze Ukraine in a few days
      6) Failed to establish air dominance
      7) Failed to establish beach-heads
      8) Sending two non-aligned countries (Finland & Sweden) to join NATO-
      etc etc - then his objectives changed to take
      smaller parts of land, only to lose over 50% of the stolen land in a Ukranian blitzattack .
      Ukraine is now armed more than ever and he's risking losing even Crimea thanks to his stupid tactics.
      All this "being the second strongest army" and "having superior weapons".
      His airforce is hiding behind the borders.
      His black sea fleet having to flee its home port.
      Sinking of his black sea flagship.
      I (and any army) call that an utter failure. 🤣

    • @steverockwell5074
      @steverockwell5074 Год назад +5

      Finally some truthful reporting.

  • @rajaydon1893
    @rajaydon1893 Год назад +43

    The west said the leopards were game changing too and look what happened 😂

    • @lutya1192
      @lutya1192 Год назад +2

      RUSSIAN TANKS ARE JUST A KIND OF FRYPAN

    • @naufalprasetya6133
      @naufalprasetya6133 Год назад +4

      ​@@lutya1192 Man Leorpads tank just only tiny skinny ass cat that has been destroyed by Ka52 and minefield.

    • @brianrasmussen2956
      @brianrasmussen2956 Год назад

      They are, however they cannot be applied in the fashion they are meant to. Multiple reasons, amongst them inadequte demimin and not enough airforce capabilities. Like using a hammer to drill holes. It wont work.

    • @sturmhauvler
      @sturmhauvler Год назад +2

      ​@@naufalprasetya6133At Least they didnt get destroyed by a homemade drone

    • @r0ns0n0l
      @r0ns0n0l Год назад +1

      @@naufalprasetya6133 u mean : got disabled by minefield. The KA-52 got destroyed by MANPADS ;)

  • @ДимитърЙосифов-т7ъ

    Oryx the guy who counts unknown vehicles as Russian?The guy who don't count Lancet and ka 52 strikes? The guy who counted the same vehicle from different angles and count it as different vehicle?

    • @jebise1126
      @jebise1126 Год назад

      is it 1 guy? i suppose its more than one but yeah... i guess they cant cheat with t90m so much because there are less of those. wonder how much fake data did they produce with more numerous tank types

    • @ImBigFloppa
      @ImBigFloppa Год назад +6

      The guy who puts unknown vehicles as Russian if original video or photo is from the POV of a Ukrainian strike, and it goes into Ukraine if the original is from a Russian POV. The guy who does count lancet and Ka-52 strikes, and the guy who removes duplicates using geolocation and will quickly correct any repeat that makes it through. Nice cope though

    • @professorg8383
      @professorg8383 Год назад +7

      If you took the time to investigate, you'd know that every one of your allegations, is complete nonsense. Oryx has one of the absolute best methods of verification of any similar reporting, And it's not a "guy", but a team of people. They report on conflict losses all over the globe, not just in Ukraine.
      They use a number of different verification techniques. But let's talk about your claims. When there are a dozen clearly identified Russian vehicles in an obvious position of a formation and one vehicle that is no longer identifiable as to what it is, whose vehicle do you think it is?? Argentinian? Of course it's Russian!!
      As for double counting, multiple verification techniques are used including geolocation information, Satellite imagery, and other location related information such as historical imagery from different days and times. It's a lot more thorough than you imply.
      As for what weapons systems brought about the demise of a target, that isn't so easy to identify. Someone might post a claim of credit to a Ka-52 for example, but if there is not enough to verify that, why would you just trust the claim? It is this exact same verification logic that make Oryx data reliable. They don't deal in opinions, they use what they can best verify as factual data. Can they make mistakes? Yes, but it's low probability, and that's going to happen without bias.
      People much smarter than you, who have more resources available, have concluded that these guys are overall the best and most reliable. Generally, their data runs a bit behind real time because the take the efforts to verify every data point. If a T90 gets mis-identified as a T72, that's really a minor error which does not impact credibility. If the same tank that was listed as damaged later ends up as destroyed, it's going to be hard to catch that. Likewise if a Russian tank get's captured and later gets identified as a Ukrainian loss, does that corrupt the data? I don't see it that way and it's possible for both sides to have lost the same specific tank. That kind of thing is insignificant enough to have little impact on the overall database.

    • @malonga2098
      @malonga2098 Год назад +1

      These organisations like the so called orix are controlled and just like UN they powerless against the US and bias

    • @blackbird99100
      @blackbird99100 Год назад

      yes, Oryx has been doing this since civil war in Syria. they're not that reliable.

  • @RajneshThapa
    @RajneshThapa Год назад +25

    INDIA stands with Russia 🇷🇺 👏 👍

    • @okanui
      @okanui Год назад +1

      go buy all their junk equipment then to go with your junk military

    • @Andzrej_Polska
      @Andzrej_Polska Год назад +1

      A pajeet supporting a giant that fails it's "Special operation" miserably.

    • @sirpoopsalot9598
      @sirpoopsalot9598 Год назад +4

      Don’t you have some telescam calls to be making…?

    • @Давидсотиев-й1ю
      @Давидсотиев-й1ю Год назад +1

      ​@@Andzrej_Polska😂😂😂 я в шоке бываю от таких заявлений 😂 Россия воюет против всего блока нато во глове с сша !! У Украины даже своих патрон не осталось !! Украина уже давно проиграла бы как минимум раз 10 !! НАТО уже пожалела что вязалась в эту войну !! Уже многоюие натовские страны воют от бессилия !! И от того что у них не осталось оружия !

    • @rogerdiogo6893
      @rogerdiogo6893 Год назад

      Never seen a Hindu, so happy for the destruction of Europe, the ONLY group that hates Europe more than the communists, you guessed it right, Hindus!😊

  • @SFHFWill
    @SFHFWill Год назад +11

    I see you listed Russian losses in tanks, not Ukraine's. I think I know why.

  • @itinensanzen
    @itinensanzen Год назад +3

    Russia never lost 2.000 tanks. Its source must be John Kirby, Lindsey Graham and Victoria Nuland.

  • @reprimand33
    @reprimand33 Год назад +46

    They need to increase the reverse speed of all these tanks

    • @T2X2ROFI
      @T2X2ROFI Год назад +4

      На Т90м уже идут работы с подвеской, говорят что будет 20-30км/ч

    • @piirakkaliisa8340
      @piirakkaliisa8340 Год назад +10

      Little did you know that all mighty russian military never retreats..they just turn around and continue to advance..so no need for better reverse xD

    • @dnguyen3941
      @dnguyen3941 Год назад +4

      @@piirakkaliisa8340 Sounds like what Prigozhin did

    • @Toulkun
      @Toulkun Год назад

      ​@@piirakkaliisa8340Like in Kharkov, Kherson and now around Bakhmut after month of taking it after a year? 😂

    • @andrehunter1295
      @andrehunter1295 Год назад

      Hehe, you better stop swallowing gov controlled western mainstream news straight down without thinking.
      Russia are still only have military operation in Ukraine, as Putin said in every speech, Russia have a goal to demilitarized Ukraine completely.
      And wipe out US trained soldiers and western weapons.
      As Putin said after biden admits that he wanted to weakening Russia and have a regime change, it's not Ukraine who's Russia's real enemy. US are Russia's main enemy, you are aware of it's still military operation ?
      Russia have not decided to declare any war against Ukraine, neither have Ukraine against Russia.
      US are using Ukraine and their nato alliance trying to weakening Russia, yes.
      Did you know that obama already in 2008 gave green light to start working on getting control over Ukraine ?
      Jeffrey Sachs said it, he was shocked.
      Because he knew US crossing Russia's red line.
      Responsible politicians in Washington also knew that, it was their plan.
      After US successfully had their presidential coup in Ukraine 2014.
      US started training and prepare Ukrainian military for this tragic proxywar trying to weakening Russia together with sanctions.
      US was confident that they would crush Russia with sanctions and kicking Russia out of SWIFT payment system.
      So US blocked the world trade with Russia.
      Well, sadly for US Russia of course knew what US working on and planned.
      So Russia already had their own payment system without using dollar together with China bank.
      So that the world freely could trade with Russia, and it's nothing US could do about it.
      US failed with absolutely everything they trying to weakening Russia with.
      Russia and Ukraine are the two largest bread basket countries in the world, that's why US trying to weakening Russia.
      Control over the food and energy that the world needs from Russia and Ukraine.
      US would managed to get control over the world 🌎
      But They ending up weakening themselves dollar and Europe more.
      Heard 41 new countries want to join BRICS alliance and use their new payment system without using dollar 💵
      That's why responsible politicians and globalist elites are so desperate right now, what's going on geopolitical just now.
      Are really serious for US, world didn't like US cynical plan using Ukraine and sanctions trying to weakening Russia.
      So this tragic proxywar make US much more weaker, everything is going wrong way for US.
      Jeffrey Sachs says that he is not surprised, he said US have had over 100 war's around the world since 1991.
      And still threatening with economic sanctions if they don't support US interest trying to get control over Russia.
      43 countries have US sanctions against just now.
      biden administration are freezing themselves from the rest of the globe.
      That's a fact, do some research on BRICS expansion, you understand what I am talking about.

  • @oneshotme
    @oneshotme Год назад +25

    For them not to be getting any chips they sure are building and upgrading a lot of things

    • @appakinggg
      @appakinggg Год назад +2

      That is because you do not understand the sanctions. It is impossible to fully block off russia from buying chips.
      Right now russia goes out of their way to buy it through other countries.
      Somewhat less quantities, higher prices. Not a total block

    • @lucasbaxter5850
      @lucasbaxter5850 Год назад +3

      ​@@appakingggsomebody gets it. Good thing you made a point to say that before these nerds start coming up with conspiracies

    • @sonyx5332
      @sonyx5332 Год назад +1

      ​@@lucasbaxter5850What's wrong with nerds? nerds are good at whatever they dedicate time to do. 😁👍🏼

    • @Kenmarshallintereststx
      @Kenmarshallintereststx Год назад +1

      Yeah it's called China and Iran

    • @tylerdurden3722
      @tylerdurden3722 Год назад

      ​@@appakinggg
      Most chips in the world are made by a company in Taiwan called TSMC.
      They have a near monopoly whne it comes to the most advanced most cutting edge chips.
      Probably more than 90 of the 100 most advanced chips nearest to you, we're all made in Taiwan by a company called TSMC.
      They make the chips of Apple, most Androids, Nvidia, AMD, the even make some chips for Intel. Even China relies on Taiwan for advanced chips.
      The chip shortage of a while ago...it was because of this one single company.
      South Korea produces most of the rest of the chips.
      Most military countries make their own military chips, because older manufacturing processes are more robust for military grade chips. In other words, cutting edge manufacturing is too delicate for military purposes.
      When it was discovered that the US used back doors in Intel chips to spy on their own allies, everyone switched to locally made chips, if possible. Russia did this too...their government PCs use chips that's based on Intel's abandoned Itanium architecture, that they manufacture themselves.

  • @brianmurray1395
    @brianmurray1395 Год назад +37

    Russian tanks are being well tested and they can continue to improve their strength and combat effectiveness. Love their tri colour paint pattern.

    • @Toulkun
      @Toulkun Год назад

      Exactly only proper armour they have are wood loggs 😂

    • @ligmasurvivor5600
      @ligmasurvivor5600 Год назад +9

      @@Toulkun leopards proper armour doesn't save it from lancet lmao

    • @hooywamd00pe95
      @hooywamd00pe95 Год назад

      They were already tested in Iraq, and they were popped like nasty zits with ease by USA. This got reinforced in Ukraine where Russian tanks are being destroyed by the thousands.

    • @Oblivion___
      @Oblivion___ Год назад

      @@Toulkun So you are saying that the Ukrainians and all of NATO is so incompetent that they cannot defeat an enemy that uses wood logs as a defense.

    • @ОлегПугач-п8щ
      @ОлегПугач-п8щ Год назад

      ​@@Toulkunу тебя нет мозга,как ты живёшь?!😂

  • @jakubsenkyrik7691
    @jakubsenkyrik7691 Год назад +2

    2137 russian loss, and 121 ukraine lost? :D :D :D :D
    ridiculous....

  • @faris.Djunaidi
    @faris.Djunaidi Год назад +16

    Saying it as game changer is stretching

    • @lol-ss8od
      @lol-ss8od Год назад +4

      They didn't say nothing about game changer like the Ukrainians

  • @andreiminin4738
    @andreiminin4738 Год назад +14

    In 1990th, I have seen field with approx 10k tanks on conservation, in Western Siberia - it was impressive view.
    "SVO" gives a good kick to military production around world but in Russia heavy equipment factories are not demolished/outsorced like in US and EU and there is no shortage with resources and power.
    There is no way someone can win direct war with Russia, only back door methods may work (perestroika, Gorbachev, etc)

    • @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1
      @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Год назад

      I disagree the USA alone out produces Russia and 10k porly maintained peaces will not change anything in the current situation

    • @andreiminin4738
      @andreiminin4738 Год назад

      @@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 these 10К tanks most likely rotted and decommissioned, but enough new ones were made. Тhe view itself was impressive - so much metal and labor! I haven't seen so many before, it is crazy. If you ever were an infantryman stuck in a field in the mud after rain (happened to me once on training), and your tank (not the enemy) is spinning nearby - you feel like a fly in honey ... a shitty feeling to be in an open place next to the tank when you can't run or jump.

    • @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1
      @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Год назад

      @@andreiminin4738 But even then the USA and NATO still easaly outprodouce Russia + they have far more and better equipment then Russia

    • @andreiminin4738
      @andreiminin4738 Год назад

      @@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Potentially, after few years, USA and NATO may produce more than Russia because they have more resource but it requires time and reasonable prices that private companies don't like. In order to be able to produce more without breaking economy, military industry should be nationalized. Can you believe that? And who knows what happens few years later - may be it will be not needed? There is no heavy facilities for Abrams in USA - last one in Detroit was demolished in 2000th; no artillery for tanks - Germany produced it.
      It seems that most western counties moved to post modern, post industrial life style and all real business (engineering, industry) outsourced.
      The best business now is 1) cut energy and resources supplies from Russia to Europe and squeeze money from Europe by selling gas to it 2) sell old military equipment and ammunition instead of utilization - probably it explains why and how it goes as it goes.

    • @andreiminin4738
      @andreiminin4738 Год назад

      And the last - no one wants real big war with nuclear heads - so it is just a business. While political situation is stable in Russia, there is no military option to win. Poor Ukrainians - they are just dying for someone's business.

  • @TomasFunes-rt8rd
    @TomasFunes-rt8rd Год назад +5

    2:40 - "According to Oryx..." Folks, I checked out Oryx early in the war, and saw how hilariously low their standard of proof is. I randomly clicked on about 100 instances of claimed destroyed ("confirmed") tanks, an at least 30% of them could be dismissed as fake straight up. Reasons : not identifiable as either Russian or Ukrainian; not identifiable as being in the current war at all (could be from Yugoslavia or Armenia or some such); not identifiable as being in any way damaged, merely a picture of a tank in the distance...! It baffles me that sensible people are still treating it as an authoritative source !!

    • @okand1921
      @okand1921 Год назад +1

      Not to mention that its open-intel, can be redacted by anyone

    • @ImBigFloppa
      @ImBigFloppa Год назад

      @bobbman3000
      1 second ago
      Can you find me a single entry in that list for a tank entry that is incorrect? Just one singular entry. You'll probably find one (it is impossible to be perfect when counting THAT many losses), but the time it would take for you to do that should help you realize.
      Oryx obviously has it's issues, but it's still a great source. WarSpotting is better though. They are much more thorough, it's regularly updated, and it's easier to sort stuff.

    • @TomasFunes-rt8rd
      @TomasFunes-rt8rd Год назад

      I've got a better idea : YOU take it upon YOURSELF to go trawling through those thousands of entries WITH AN OPEN, ENQUIRING MIND, at all times asking yourself "could this here tank in the distance be actually UNDAMAGED and INTACT ?" or "could this tank here be actually photographed before 2022?" or "could this plain green APC with no insignia in the distance belong to the other side?" You will find many like this. @@ImBigFloppa

  • @15425rfggdfc
    @15425rfggdfc Год назад +2

    Россия решит все проблемы.

  • @romieiv
    @romieiv Год назад +5

    a force shield that could defeat all kinetic rounds or missiles would be "game changing" not a mere upgrade.

    • @rendezvouzwithrama
      @rendezvouzwithrama 2 месяца назад

      I'm surprised this channel hasn't already announced it, along with phasers and warp drive.

  • @stanislaff3511
    @stanislaff3511 Год назад +1

    Ukraine lost all its tanks, then all the tanks that Poland handed over to it, then lost almost all tanks from the Czech Republic, Germany, Britain... Now Ukraine is again asking for weapons, which will also lose.

  • @igorsergeev6716
    @igorsergeev6716 Год назад +14

    Sounds like Russia's MOD commercial

  • @RealityCheck6969
    @RealityCheck6969 Год назад +1

    Those tanks were made for export. All they did was cancel the export and send them to Ukraine.

  • @smartkking4984
    @smartkking4984 Год назад +31

    Ukraine lost zero tanks since the start of the war according to oryx

    • @milangacik994
      @milangacik994 Год назад +16

      That´s why they beg for old scrap all over the World...

    • @gabork.8715
      @gabork.8715 Год назад +6

      According to Oryx based on photo evidence Ukraine lost 600 tanks in total and 400 tanks destroyed. So your figure is not correct!
      At the same time the Russian losses were 2173 tanks of which 1389 were total loss. Probably the russian losses are over 3000 by now, and they are bringing more ever older tanks!
      Also these losses are minimum that can be documented, so the losses are bigger.
      The funny thing is that there have been big celebrations by the russians that they knocked out 7-8 Leopard tanks, 2 total loss, rest be repaired, but they dont realize that at least 3000 russian tanks have been destroyed, by comparison. So after russian logic the russain tanks are better then the western tanks! Funny!

    • @ragincajun2446
      @ragincajun2446 Год назад +1

      or how Russia is begging North Korea for artillery or Iran for drones or china for ceramic and other parts
      @@milangacik994

    • @carfran53
      @carfran53 Год назад

      😅😅

    • @dougstong5723
      @dougstong5723 Год назад +1

      I do not know how many tanks the Ukrainians have actually lost - it is larger that the 0 value you attribute to Oryx. Spending 30 seconds with google, this is what I found wrt Ukrainian tank losses according to Oryx:
      * 4 Leopard 2A4: (1, destroyed) (1, damaged) (2, damaged) (3, damaged)
      * 7 Leopard 2A6: (1, destroyed) (2, destroyed) (1, damaged) (2, damaged) (3, damaged) (4, damaged) (1, damaged and abandoned)
      * 36 Unknown tank: (1, destroyed) (2, destroyed) (3, destroyed) (4, destroyed) (5, destroyed) (6, destroyed) (7, destroyed) (8, destroyed) (9, destroyed) (10 and 11, destroyed) (12, destroyed) (13, destroyed) (14, destroyed) (15, destroyed) (16, destroyed) (17, destroyed) (18, destroyed) (19, destroyed) (20, destroyed) (21, destroyed) (22, destroyed) (23, destroyed) (24, destroyed) (25, destroyed) (26, destroyed) (27, destroyed) (28, destroyed) (29, destroyed) (30, destroyed) (31, destroyed) (32, destroyed) (33, destroyed) (34, destroyed) (35, destroyed) (1, damaged)

  • @hingng9772
    @hingng9772 Год назад +1

    Oh, more Upgraded Tanks for Ukraine?

  • @stephennoble
    @stephennoble Год назад +8

    Tractors at the ready for recovery 💪

  • @Frostbite124
    @Frostbite124 Год назад +2

    Definitely didnt destroyed 2100 tanks:D they havent even deployed this much ammount of tanks since the start of the SMO:D propaganda as always.

  • @LooxJJ
    @LooxJJ Год назад +8

    Ukrainians have learned to use Javelin missiles very effectively…but now they’ve figured out that a drone carrying an improvised tandem charges to the engine decks actually disables the tank. Does not destroy the tank…but enough damage for the crews to abandon it. A Javelin costs about USD$80k…an improvised kamikaze drone costs about $700. Wow…

  • @DarrisHerrold-ls7xv
    @DarrisHerrold-ls7xv Год назад

    Soooo were the armada at?

  • @jyralnadreth4442
    @jyralnadreth4442 Год назад +3

    An upgraded tank isn't going to change a thing, if they don't change their tactics and doctrine then these tanks will be lost too

    • @Zlatirano
      @Zlatirano Год назад

      Their tactics are fine, and their doctrine. THis is not hearts of iron 4 btw. This is reality. The problem is the western digitalized totalitarian dictatorships sending all their equipment to a foreign country which has a insane corruption problem and isnt even in nato. They also fund neo nazis in their own army. Thats the problem.

  • @DeepSlice
    @DeepSlice Год назад +33

    Without infatry to support the tanks, it does not matter how advanced the armored vehicles are, all are easy to destroy with the proper anti-tank weapons. Also if the numbers about the lost and captured tanks are correct, it will take a lot of time to replenish the fleet and it's far more cost effective to produce and use a Javelin for instance. In summary, Russia won't change the status quo with doubling their production.

    • @MolnarG007
      @MolnarG007 Год назад +10

      The numbers are wrong, we got video evidence of 5-30 tank Ukraine tanks destroyed by artillery, mines, Lancet drones, Ka-52 attack helicopters, MLRS missile barrages daily (nowadays they use again more tanks in the South, 80% are destroyed in these assaults) . Naturally the true loss is minimum twice, not everything recorded and showed.
      Infantry causes less than 5%. Ukraine uses Artillery and drones mainly from distance, not Anti tank infantry.

    • @DeepSlice
      @DeepSlice Год назад +1

      @@MolnarG007 if Ukraine was loosing equipment so hard,why isn't Russia in Kiev yet?

    • @MolnarG007
      @MolnarG007 Год назад +14

      @@DeepSlice I live in NATO cou try but yes they sacrificed 40% of received Western armoured vehicles and tanks to press through. As i wrote minefield, missile barrages and complete air control is against them.
      The question how much they gain for this sacrifice.
      The attacker also always have bigger loses even when same artillery, air support present.
      The question isn't the equipment, it's manpower.
      Russia bigger, so they can use only contracted troops and volunteers, and using conscipts only in Russia for support transport, defense, etc. They get 1000 volunteers for money daily. Ukraine uses conscipts, 18-60, and those ready to do their duty are long joined. It's super bad that only those they must conscipt by force left, using vans, getting people from market, streets. I understand they must, but this show they are running out of men. Having losses 1 to 1 isn't enough, Russia got 4x numbers.
      This also proves their bravery.

    • @hannibalwantsahuggrande3433
      @hannibalwantsahuggrande3433 Год назад

      ​@@DeepSlice Do everyone with a functioning brain a favor, go to the closest bathroom, look in the mirror and promptly slap yourself.

    • @tackytrooper
      @tackytrooper Год назад +3

      The supply of US ATGMs is drying up. Not just for Ukraine, for everyone. The production lines literally have to be spun back up and that doesn't happen over night.

  • @Alien_isolationist
    @Alien_isolationist Год назад

    Yes but how many of each tanks are being made each year now?

  • @chadbernard2641
    @chadbernard2641 Год назад +31

    The fact that you believe oryx is saddest part of whole video.

    • @ragincajun2446
      @ragincajun2446 Год назад +1

      a source that has the evidence to back it up like Russia they would say they destroyed 100 himars and u believe that but when actual video evidence comes to light and how bad Russia is losing u say oryx is fake my guy please before u speak try not make yourself look like a total dumbass btw the russian nazis have lost over 11,000 tanks while Ukraine has only lost 3,900 and thats confirmable by video and photo proof.

    • @luciankristov6436
      @luciankristov6436 Год назад

      And you believe the news and ukrainioid propaganda lol ... The ukrainioids are losing badly...

    • @ImBigFloppa
      @ImBigFloppa Год назад +4

      Believing the most reliable resource on vehicle losses by far is sad? Should the Kremlin be believed? Should the Ukrainian government be believed?

    • @chadbernard2641
      @chadbernard2641 Год назад

      @@ImBigFloppa who called it reliable? The MSM from the west. There is no consensus that oryx is correct. Only western sources. Quote oryx because it fits their narrative. Multiple different forums have found highly questionable data on the site.
      Like they captured 500+ tanks yet they still had no tanks to do an offensive? That would seem odd, they should have an abundance of extra tanks or all those tanks have been destroyed. Ukraine literally said they were out tanks and had to wait for tanks from western colonizers because they had so few. Where is oryx data on those 500+ tanks that seem to be unaccounted for.

    • @РаРа-у3д
      @РаРа-у3д Год назад

      @@ImBigFloppa
      это тот самый орикс который
      русский танк получил царапину : оу , русский танк уничтожен
      украинский танк разлетелся на куски : его отремонтируют и вернут в строй
      ну как такому не верить )))

  • @devologue
    @devologue Год назад +1

    Can it protect itself from Lancet type drones?

    • @ligmasurvivor5600
      @ligmasurvivor5600 Год назад +5

      the only lancet type drones Ukraine supposedly has is the switchblade 600 and we haven't seen much of them

  • @partymayker
    @partymayker Год назад +4

    T-90M shids all over Abrams and Leopards

    • @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1
      @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Год назад

      In your Dreams maby reality is different as the war in Ukraine shows

    • @smokkeyd6
      @smokkeyd6 5 месяцев назад

      @@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 10 later this didnt age well lmao western tanks are garbage

  • @brianmurray1395
    @brianmurray1395 Год назад +2

    Don’t care what they say the experts. The T90 M is a decent concept made for the grounds and tactics of eastern europe

    • @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1
      @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Год назад

      The t90 is just a renamed t72 and it is just as bad as it 💩🚽

    • @BojanPeric-kq9et
      @BojanPeric-kq9et Год назад

      @@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1you have no clue what are you talking about. You just said that Abrams is crappy tank: heavy, not great armor for that weight, fuel thirsty, all that with outdated 105mm gun.

    • @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1
      @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Год назад

      @@BojanPeric-kq9et wrong comment section?
      It's about the t 90 and t72 not the abrams

    • @BojanPeric-kq9et
      @BojanPeric-kq9et Год назад

      @@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1I just paraphrased what you wrote about T-90 to American lingo.

    • @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1
      @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Год назад

      @@BojanPeric-kq9et t90 and t72 were good for there time but that time has long been over
      And modernisation is very hard because of Russian corruption

  • @radekslar3576
    @radekslar3576 Год назад +5

    😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃The Russian army had about 3500 tanks in service in 2021, according to that nonsense they lost about 2100 tanks in Ukraine, considering the number of deployed units that never exceeded 50% of the Russian forces, that is about 1750 tanks, so they lost more than they should have. Super logical and verified messages. Just as true as the T-55, T-62 tanks are from the 1940s. Find objective information or don't make videos.

    • @Slava_Mitrofanov
      @Slava_Mitrofanov Год назад

      Приложи к башке мокрое полотенчико.

    • @radekslar3576
      @radekslar3576 Год назад

      @@Slava_Mitrofanov Логика не твоя сильная сторона

    • @Slava_Mitrofanov
      @Slava_Mitrofanov Год назад +1

      ​@@radekslar3576Логика? Откуда у тебя сведения о 2100 уничтоженных российский танков? Это тебе сказали те же самые люди которые тебе обещали европейские зарплаты после майдана? И ты опять им веришь?
      Ответь лучше на простой вопрос. У Украины было около 3000 советских танков на 2021 год. Залужный попросил 600 иностранных танков для контрнаступа. Вопрос: зачем ему эти танки если есть 3000 советских? Куда они делись? Сгорели на поле боя, да?

    • @radekslar3576
      @radekslar3576 Год назад +1

      Вы неправильно прочитали мой комментарий. Я, наоборот, насмехаюсь над информацией о тысячах уничтоженных русских танков. Я пишу, что в том видео есть сообщение о большем количестве уничтоженных танков, чем развернутых русскими.

    • @Slava_Mitrofanov
      @Slava_Mitrofanov Год назад

      @@radekslar3576
      Тогда извините за невнимательность 👍

  • @pixelfungaming
    @pixelfungaming Год назад

    Alot of vague information about the upgraded Tanks until 5:36 where the video finally lists the specific upgrades.

  • @renumihai5263
    @renumihai5263 Год назад +3

    The main reason that Russia did lost this bulk of MBT's is old expired tactics of sovietic era, and also second being the traning of the crew on there tech; the part with bad quality parts, it can be found in any military tech, because is all about $$$$$

    • @BojanPeric-kq9et
      @BojanPeric-kq9et Год назад

      No, that is maybe 3rd reason. You totally missed main reason.

  • @alanfenick1103
    @alanfenick1103 Год назад +1

    What happened to the ground breaking T-14? Russia has had problems with production an they stated they were making 60 new units per month. Overhauling older models is time consuming and didn’t address the inherent problems of the self loading system and stowage of live ammunition in the turret and floor. Last week the Ukrainians destroyed the plant that manufactures electro-optical systems for all Russian tanks as well as being cut off from cut off from importing Swedish and French fire control systems, computer chips for engines and other electronics! Wonder if this is a face saving propaganda report minimizing the failure of Russia’s armor designs. Ukraine has reduced the Russian Ka-52 Alligator fleet by an estimated 25%of Russias total machines. With 25% losses I’m sure crews aren’t overly excited to man these machines. Where is the Su-57 Felon Russia’s world beating 4.5th generation fighter. India walked away from buying and manufacturing the fighter as it did not meet it’s specifications or role. Basically Russia lost the cash to make India’s and their own planes from the profits. There are no other buyers so far. The war has hurt Russia’s military sales and reputation with its massive equipment loses in Ukraine to Western equipment. This is not good as the military sales finances the Russian military.

  • @milangacik994
    @milangacik994 Год назад +12

    Russians lost 500 tanks in first day of Kursk battle. Germans lost less, but could not keep up with Russian productivity so as stamina. Now it is even worse for NATO. They have nothing to offer.

    • @hisvin
      @hisvin Год назад +7

      USSR not Russia.

    • @gostan2718
      @gostan2718 Год назад

      ​@@hisvinyes Russia is not USSR but Russia inherited almost everything of USSR

    • @milangacik994
      @milangacik994 Год назад +2

      @@AaronC123-q9t Entire West now is weaker than Germany then during WWII. Germany was ruling almost entire Europe BTW... West is nto finances, Russia into units. War is about units not about finances.

    • @hisvin
      @hisvin Год назад +1

      @@gostan2718 Inherited nothing...Have half the population, USSR has so I don't see what you're argument is.
      Corruption? Yes, it's top notch in Russia.
      Socialism? Nope, it's a capitalist state with a great gaps between the poors and the richs.
      So please explain?

    • @patriktoth6258
      @patriktoth6258 Год назад +1

      ​@@AaronC123-q9tIf we check the numbers of equipment/soldiers we need 1.5 more germany to have more than the modern day numbers. Most NATO countries did not spent much money on their army in the past years..

  • @LocalhostTube
    @LocalhostTube Год назад +1

    2000+ танков потеряли ? а че так мало, написали бы сразу 20000 или лучше 200000

  • @blastermike_sd70ace80
    @blastermike_sd70ace80 Год назад

    Supposedly russia has built 120 T90ms since last February. Does anyone know if the new models have sosna u?

    • @definitelyfrank9341
      @definitelyfrank9341 Год назад

      All new Russian tanks are equipped with a domestically-produced sight which the media calls a Sosna-U copy. Sosna-U is Belarusian, by the way.

    • @definitelyfrank9341
      @definitelyfrank9341 Год назад

      The channel RedEffect has a very interesting video analysing the production rate of T-90Ms, you should check it out. It's called something along the lines of "T-90M performance in Ukraine"

  • @notani3533
    @notani3533 Год назад +12

    Even if it's cutting-edge, how long would it take for the crew to master it? Not to mention many strikes happen due to the lack of countermeasures being taken to prevent it since most of the personnel weren't trained that well.

    • @ligmasurvivor5600
      @ligmasurvivor5600 Год назад

      there is arena s soft kill which no longer uses shtora jammers, it uses aerosol ammunition (basically very advanced smoke launchers) and a Russian tank is easier to get used to than a western one iirc

    • @definitelyfrank9341
      @definitelyfrank9341 Год назад

      They recieve months of training on the T-90Ms on top of their years of experience with T-72B3Ms/T-80BVMs/T-90As.

    • @尤其此刻王永慶惡女跟
      @尤其此刻王永慶惡女跟 Год назад

      Russia has an elite and experienced tank crews unlike ukraine

    • @ElGrandoCaymano
      @ElGrandoCaymano 11 месяцев назад

      @@definitelyfrank9341 Who does?

  • @slimhope1
    @slimhope1 Год назад +1

    That Ukrainian offensive has already failed miserably so your a bit behind the curve.

  • @sciencespectrum3855
    @sciencespectrum3855 Год назад +7

    They should make invisible tank

    • @agentepolaris4914
      @agentepolaris4914 Год назад +6

      I imagine the tankists just floating in the air while riding it lol

    • @dulithasiriwardana8724
      @dulithasiriwardana8724 Год назад +1

      I love tanks tank but the truth is no tank is invisible , history make that very clear. But i adore the Russians approach on tank manufacturing. Cheap and efficient, easily used and repair and able to large scale manufacturing.
      This is very logical

    • @ChandranPrema123
      @ChandranPrema123 Год назад +2

      Actually T14 Armata has Anti Thermal paint that makes it invisible to Thermal Equipments

    • @sirmingusdewiv8325
      @sirmingusdewiv8325 Год назад +2

      ​@@dulithasiriwardana8724Very logical if it works. Russia couldn't and still can't build a decent car. But now a new tank. Whatever.

    • @nigeh5326
      @nigeh5326 Год назад +2

      Maybe they have but nobody has seen it lol 😅

  • @COLECTIVOJUVENILACLU
    @COLECTIVOJUVENILACLU Год назад

    OK NOW TELL US, HOW MANY TANKS HAVE THE GERMANS, ENGLISH AND AMERICANS LOST?

  • @Утер.Светоносный
    @Утер.Светоносный Год назад +11

    Помню они говорили что леопарды изменят ход войны, а что мы видим что относительно слабый против бронированных танков дрон ланцет легко проходит броню леопард 2а6, а против старых т72/64 он не мог 😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @tonycavanagh1929
    @tonycavanagh1929 Год назад +1

    Do they have the manpower to man them, and the logistics to support them in the field, and the skill to deploy them to there best.

  • @vaninec
    @vaninec Год назад +6

    Russia never deployed 2000+ tanks in Ukraine, IF that happens, it will ALL over in one week. Whole Europe would be over run.
    😅

  • @johannjohann6523
    @johannjohann6523 Год назад +1

    One can't but help wonder, with Ukraine not being able to target Russian production capability, how much longer in time will this war last?

    • @superman6812
      @superman6812 Год назад

      To the last Ukrainian. According to Western hosts

  • @HypeBeast764
    @HypeBeast764 Год назад +12

    Doesn’t matter cause they’re still gonna turn into an inferno when they’re hit by a javelin or suicide drone

    • @00shakz12
      @00shakz12 Год назад +10

      So are the western tanks just the way it is really

    • @Toulkun
      @Toulkun Год назад

      ​@@00shakz12Western tanks are far more advanced ofc because west is more technolicaly advance and Russia doesnt produce any of own components. Western tanks are usually not lost only tracks get destroyed which can be repaired and thats what happend with Leopards in Zaporozia and it was due to heavy mine fields and artillery strikes. Meanwhile first T 90 was lost around Kharkiv year ago 😂

    • @00shakz12
      @00shakz12 Год назад

      @@Toulkun oh shut up there are loads of vids of western tanks burning,if they why are Ukraine begging more tanks lol work it out.....

    • @ledzepandhabs
      @ledzepandhabs Год назад

      @@Toulkun Russia produces all of it's own components idiot.

    • @sonyx5332
      @sonyx5332 Год назад

      ​@@Toulkun🥱🤦‍♂️

  • @Beltfedshooters
    @Beltfedshooters 5 месяцев назад

    I see recent new stories about Russia almost out of tanks? Whats the deal with that? Tank shortage?

  • @Patriot2499
    @Patriot2499 Год назад +4

    Russia has multiple diffrent tanks. America has 1. To do everything. Russia has a weapon for every job. Every enviroment every confl

    • @jhint1929
      @jhint1929 Год назад +1

      I don't think this guy understand warfare and logistics

    • @LooxJJ
      @LooxJJ Год назад

      Russia only has 2…T-72BM/T-90 and T-80…but T-80 is only used as reserve and taken out of the mainline after Chechnya disaster. US has M1 Abrams series (A1, A2, A2 SEP, A2 SEPV3/4 etc). Each nation has different military doctrines - and the US knows what they are doing.

    • @alekseiruin6772
      @alekseiruin6772 Год назад

      кремлебот научился пользоваться гугл транслейт.

  • @СергейКузнецов-д9к

    Нет своего оборудования и мозгов чтобы собирать свою украинскую технику..Даже свои гривны в Канаде производят .позорище.

  • @DetroitMicroSound
    @DetroitMicroSound Год назад +5

    Who do you work for, RuZFed? 🤣

  • @utiz4321
    @utiz4321 Год назад +1

    Russia did not lose anywhere near that many tanks. Or x s has bad methodologies and is biased.

  • @sajithudayanga6503
    @sajithudayanga6503 Год назад +3

    Forget T-62 & T-55 that Russia use as Howitzers and Kamikaze Tanks. Ukraine sent Slovanian T-55 at the front line and 2 reportedly got Destroyed 😅

  • @ventsislavalexandriyski3989
    @ventsislavalexandriyski3989 Год назад +2

    I am very interested, how in your imagination happens capture of Russian tanks by Ukrainians?

  • @freerideralec
    @freerideralec Год назад +5

    You forgot to mention that Russian tanks are not built and sent to various countries on behalf of tax payers money, unlike the ones in America 😊

    • @Nothing_to_write0
      @Nothing_to_write0 Год назад +1

      The money is from Russian people's bank accounts 😂😂😂😂

    • @lucasbaxter5850
      @lucasbaxter5850 Год назад

      Lmaooo what tf does that have to do with it😂

  • @foshizzlfizzl
    @foshizzlfizzl Год назад +1

    unfortunately you have the wrong pictures from the latest T-72B3M. The never versions hav much more reactive armor.also the T-90M3 has changed sind the Ukrainian Conflict. And by the way, Oryx is biased towards the west.

  • @clarencewilson5253
    @clarencewilson5253 Год назад +7

    The Russian are brilliant fighters they are the top in chess

    • @dougstong5723
      @dougstong5723 Год назад +2

      If the Russians are so brilliant, then why did several backhoes, some dynamite, and some shoulder mounted rockets stop them at Kiev's suburbs?
      Also, the current top Chess Grandmaster is Magnus Carlsen, who is from Norway. The top Russian is ranked fifth.

    • @lucasbaxter5850
      @lucasbaxter5850 Год назад

      @@dougstong5723 or the fact that Wagner has been a better fighting force than Russias actual army

    • @dougstong5723
      @dougstong5723 Год назад

      @@lucasbaxter5850 Yes, it takes real bravery to send Russian convicts (with little training) in waves to assault entrenched Ukrainian troops.

    • @РаРа-у3д
      @РаРа-у3д Год назад

      @@dougstong5723 я правильно понимаю , что мясо из заключенных разбили в бахмуте элитную украинскую армию обученную экспертами из НАТО с поддержкой всего мира и лучшим оружием ? вы же понимаете , что такие утверждения больше унижают украинцев чем русских )))
      Каждый раз когда вы говорите "русские воюют лопатами" задумайтесь почему они ебут вас даже лопатами и почему зеленский до сих пор не кататься на абрамсе по красной площади если у русских всё так плохо

  • @Fightingturtle404
    @Fightingturtle404 Год назад +2

    Tanks are useless in this war anyways, I mean you've got mines, RPG's, Drones, TOW's, artillery etc. I'm sure there's a lot more.

  • @miru4226
    @miru4226 Год назад

    T90M Proryv is derived from T72…? WTF...

  • @FXGreggan.
    @FXGreggan. Год назад +13

    Losing 4100 tanks I can imagine they need a new design :)

    • @BoogsMcNoogs
      @BoogsMcNoogs Год назад +1

      AT LEAST 4100 tanks. Shit, they were filling older cold war tanks with explosives and jihading them at UA forces. It's way more than 4100

    • @LordEmperorHyperion
      @LordEmperorHyperion Год назад

      Sure, a lie is still a lie no matter how many times one keeps repeating it, doesn't make it the truth, Ukraine has not even breach Russian defences, and down to only reserves whatever will they do.

    • @82boulou
      @82boulou Год назад +16

      Believing that they lost this number I can imagine you need a new news source.

    • @cordellmohawk8408
      @cordellmohawk8408 Год назад +10

      Ukraine just added their lost tanks to Russia 😂

    • @FXGreggan.
      @FXGreggan. Год назад +2

      @@BoogsMcNoogs Probably, ~4100 taken out of action verified on Oryx..

  • @geeussery8849
    @geeussery8849 Год назад

    just don't understand why no top AA?

  • @majidb6266
    @majidb6266 Год назад +6

    Oryx is like a old fisherman telling a story about how he catch the biggest fish. Russia lost some tanks but not in this overrated numbers 💥💣 and dont forget that Ukraine did has the largest post soviet armor. That the needed western armor is enough to make your own conclusions. T-55's are used as a fixed mobile howitzer in second line as support. We didn't see them in the frontline and no need. Russia has a shitload of t72, t80, t90 and they come fast (upgraded) out the factory. And Russia isn't yet in full war modus.

    • @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1
      @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Год назад

      Nice cope 🤣🤣🤣🤣
      At least try to make your propaganda believable

    • @majidb6266
      @majidb6266 Год назад

      @@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 hear hear, its our believer of Ghost of Kyiv 🙄

    • @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1
      @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Год назад

      @@majidb6266 Yeah he could be real but I don't know for a fact he's real (but I doubt it's a lie )

  • @Ricardo-lb4so
    @Ricardo-lb4so Год назад

    Ok. This was supposed to be the third "game changer" in a row. Could the propaganda media buy a creativity game changer, please?

  • @krissbond725
    @krissbond725 Год назад +3

    I saw someone commented that how many tank does Russia produce and how many did Ukraine destroyed in a single day.
    After Leo 2 destroyed they don't appear again.
    I just invited them to comment.

  • @dedskin1
    @dedskin1 9 месяцев назад

    No new tank will make a difference , T34 , T50 and those old Tanks will make a difference . These new tanks will be commanders for critical push and strategic operation , but for maintaining the battle line the old tanks will do . Tank is a Tank , AK 47 still works . of ocurse Russia has to upgrade , not because they need it for Ukraine , but because they need to sell it . This is why they made it , to keep up . Not becase they need it , they dont need it for Ukraine , its an Urban warfare , Drones , artillery and Air power supporting troops on the ground , simple as that . Simple is good .

  • @Robbiehans
    @Robbiehans Год назад +5

    I’m glad both sides improving their tanks

  • @paparucoontour
    @paparucoontour Год назад +2

    I was enjoying the video till it reached the propaganda objective of which it was made. If Russians lost/abandoned 3k tanks I can safely say I'm the king of England😂😂😂

  • @karldonutz7770
    @karldonutz7770 Год назад +3

    God bless Russia.

    • @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1
      @Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1 Год назад

      No got bless Ukraine and condem the Russian government for there crimes

    • @ivengo7064
      @ivengo7064 Год назад

      @@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1это например какие «преступления»?

    • @BojanPeric-kq9et
      @BojanPeric-kq9et Год назад

      @@Vermine_supreme.enjoyer.nb1what crimes? Invading sovereign country?

  • @petermasaryk9621
    @petermasaryk9621 Год назад +2

    T90M Proryv is the best tank. Like T34 in WW2. Now is the newest Proryv3.

  • @ivanbasson982
    @ivanbasson982 Год назад +1

    But UKRAINE also approves !!....

  • @jaybernieschoep3491
    @jaybernieschoep3491 Год назад +9

    nato allies need to destroy that tank factory. and missile factories.

    • @lahoucine
      @lahoucine Год назад +9

      cope more

    • @lahoucine
      @lahoucine Год назад

      and your country will be vaporized few mins later

    • @jamesgornall5731
      @jamesgornall5731 Год назад

      You know what the "U" in "Uralvagonzavod" is? Ural? You know where the Ural mountains are? Yeah, an ICBM will travel so far, going to end civilisation that way?

    • @renanvinicius6036
      @renanvinicius6036 Год назад

      I thought the Russians were stupid and just produce crap, why would you enter ww3 to destroy a garbage factor Mr. NPC?

    • @cephalonbob15
      @cephalonbob15 Год назад +6

      ah yes, and start ww3, very good idea.
      current Russia has been beyond tolerant of nato aggression so far, despite constant provocation by Urkaine. Even after the assassination attempt via drone, Russia has been beyond calm.

  • @mrwilson7617
    @mrwilson7617 Год назад

    Without the parts formerly obtained from outside Russia the real world production and capabilities will be substantially hindered.

    • @BojanPeric-kq9et
      @BojanPeric-kq9et Год назад

      Do you really think that Russia didn't "decouple" since 2014 and even before?

  • @user1337BE
    @user1337BE Год назад +6

    Who cares if it's updated. A javelin missile or sort like can blow up the turret with ease. The tank shells are stored below the crew, not in a separate compartment.

    • @alpejohnson491
      @alpejohnson491 Год назад +3

      Actually most ammunition detonation occurs not in the corusel it occurs in the turret because there is ammo in the turret for the T-72 this is why alot of the times T-80 crews don't experience the exposive effect as much as in such this is a cope comment the AMX-10RC was destroyed and killed all crew from 1 artillery round that did not land on the vehicle only near it this is from a ukrainian battalion personal. The T-90M did fix this issue with having sperate compartment in the Turret. Because saying that the courosel will ignite alot is like saying any sherman will because its on the floor the ammunition its the best place to put it at with sacrafising crew comfort. Most chances that shrapnel get to the bottom of the tank is pretty low especially if its top attack aummunition that is programmed to his center mass on tanks anyway. It kills crew but any tank would suffer that fate. Seen as with leopards being striked with artillery.

  • @MongolHyolmo
    @MongolHyolmo Год назад +1

    3:11 bro why r u lying

  • @WILLIAM1690WALES
    @WILLIAM1690WALES Год назад +6

    Good news for the Russians. If you believe this Ukraine now has ordered another 5000 javelin and Nlaw missiles.😳😀

    • @lahoucine
      @lahoucine Год назад

      and no canon fodder to use them. they will end in Syria lol

    • @koukimonzta
      @koukimonzta Год назад +2

      There are 500k drones waiting for them 😂😂🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪💪

    • @renanvinicius6036
      @renanvinicius6036 Год назад

      Well, if you want them to be operated by children, okay NPC, because the west and the Ukrainian government it's been very serious about fighting to the last ukrainian.

    • @smartkking4984
      @smartkking4984 Год назад

      Yeah right so many game changer western equipment fucked up by a rusty shovel

    • @Aguila_Azteca_1810
      @Aguila_Azteca_1810 Год назад +1

      Una cosa es pedirlos y otra que te los entreguen a tiempo.
      Ucrania puede pedir todo lo que quiera pero no depende de ellos la capacidad de producción.

  • @planetaplan440
    @planetaplan440 Год назад

    Урал вагон завод вышел на военные рельсы. 3000 танков в год только новых. Это трехсменная работа.

  • @miki_car
    @miki_car Год назад +3

    T-55 was build for nuclear war

  • @johnlisker
    @johnlisker Год назад

    T54 and T64 are not from the 40s.

    • @ImBigFloppa
      @ImBigFloppa Год назад

      The first T-54 prototype was built in 1945 and the first production unit entered service in 1948

  • @mosnicolae1678
    @mosnicolae1678 Год назад +2

    New targetpractice for Bayraktar :)

  • @rogeroeyen
    @rogeroeyen Год назад

    Anyone believing the figures coming from Oryx urgently needs to have his head examined.
    Not only is Oryx far from impartial, but also proven to fudge the numbers by counting the same tank photographed from different angles as separate tanks and not making the distinction between Ukrainian and Russian tanks.

  • @Timberjac
    @Timberjac Год назад +11

    More candidates to apply for the World Turret Launch World Championship... Although they arrive high, they have not yet managed to put any into orbit... But with Russian teNAZIty they surely succeed.

    • @inisipisTV
      @inisipisTV Год назад +3

      That's the same thing the N@zi said about the US Sherman tank. Ironic isn't it.

    • @ImBigFloppa
      @ImBigFloppa Год назад +2

      @@inisipisTV Difference is that there is absolutely zero validity to the claim that the Sherman tossed it turret any more than any other tank. In fact, battlefield reports and first hand reports both show that the Sherman was (by a pretty wide margin) the safest tank to be in.

    • @aimxdy8680
      @aimxdy8680 Год назад +2

      @@ImBigFloppaAnd not only was sherman safe, it was also the most reliable and versatile tank. You could do anything to the chassis like slap a bigger gun (105 mm variant) aid in mine warfare etc.
      It combined quality with quantity which the russians and germans both lacked. 50,000 produced sherman’s would win against 65,000 produced t34s.

    • @BojanPeric-kq9et
      @BojanPeric-kq9et Год назад

      @@ImBigFloppaof course it was safe when it was used mostly near the end of the war.

  • @85Bad4ever
    @85Bad4ever Год назад

    did he really said t60 are from1940s ?

  • @redosorio5278
    @redosorio5278 Год назад +3

    Russian Tanks are really beautiful. Its sad it was build for destruction.

    • @robb_stepanovich
      @robb_stepanovich Год назад +3

      Эти танки построены для защиты

    • @BojanPeric-kq9et
      @BojanPeric-kq9et Год назад

      They are built for defense, unlike NATO tanks.

  • @thegt
    @thegt Год назад +1

    This sounds hella lot like a typical russian propaganda. Even avoiding phrase like "war" and instead using "special military operation".

    • @vulgarisopinio
      @vulgarisopinio Год назад +1

      Using Oryx as a source of info?

    • @thegt
      @thegt Год назад +1

      @@vulgarisopinio if anyone outside Russia uses the expression "special military operation" and means it, that person or organization is a Russian propagandist. There is a war going on. Putin and company use "special military operation" as an obvious excuse to conquer some land as if it's the 19th century or earlier. Period.

  • @mrhqyangtechnic_q_emx8180
    @mrhqyangtechnic_q_emx8180 Год назад +3

    Game Changing? did Ukraine Surrendered so far?

    • @inisipisTV
      @inisipisTV Год назад

      Latest news, they are now.

    • @sathivv950
      @sathivv950 Год назад

      @@inisipisTV I am most amused how Russia went from supposedly being able take Ukraine in days, to now being on the defensive. Bottom line is Russia has been embarrassed on the world stage by a much smaller and poorer country.

  • @ShR1000
    @ShR1000 Год назад +1

    Modernisation does not mean giving it a fresh paint

  • @roshanwadasinghe7294
    @roshanwadasinghe7294 Год назад +18

    So many Nato soy boys crying here

    • @ivan1kot
      @ivan1kot Год назад

      Это ципсошники чубатые

    • @ragincajun2446
      @ragincajun2446 Год назад +2

      should've seen the Russian nazis crying when they couldn't take kyiv in 3 days and how there "special military operation" turned from special to special ed

  • @Oscuros
    @Oscuros Год назад

    It's a shame, because in the old Soviet propaganda, they'd always use an English presenter and not an American one, though I can see why, the thing is, they also had cogent reasons to ignore American English. They also taught actual English in their schools and not the American dialect.

  • @eriks.9730
    @eriks.9730 Год назад +3

    Love the quoting of the tank factory manager’s statement on meeting production and quality control quotas. Nothing has changed. Soviet managers were good at managing statistics, too.

    • @AndrewRance-y3c
      @AndrewRance-y3c Год назад +1

      "Managing statistics" - ie lying......

    • @UltraTotenkopf
      @UltraTotenkopf Год назад

      *Soviet managers really knew how to manage factories, they were able to move more than 3,000 factories and about 5 million workers beyond the Urals in 1941 in a short time, and already in 1943, Soviet industry was able to break the back of the industry of the European Union, led by Nazi Germany, so draw conclusions dude, unless you're an idiot with a broken brain!*

    • @BojanPeric-kq9et
      @BojanPeric-kq9et Год назад

      US managers are good at "price control", that is paying common coffee machine like it is built from titanium.

  • @mbxcutang7918
    @mbxcutang7918 Год назад

    If you are right with your report then Ukraine won't be asking for more military aid. The reality in the ground doesn't coincide with this video.

  • @avstria
    @avstria Год назад +4

    game changing like leopard 2

  • @deven6518
    @deven6518 Год назад +1

    Oryx is not open source lol. Look at their base and funding 😂