Remote Viewing and Statistical Validation
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 окт 2024
- Dr. Jessica Utts, Professor of Statistics at UC Irvine, provides statistical validation and scientific proof of remote viewing, AKA psychic phenomenon, as a legitimate human capability.
Get a book full of images. Randomly insert a marker between pages, don't look at the pages. Relax, free yourself from distraction and see the image on the marked page in your minds eyes. Take your time and do this in a space where you can concentrate without distraction. Once you have something, draw it on a blank piece of paper. Now compare your image with what you randomly selected. Finally, decide for YOURSELF whether remote viewing works for you or not. It does not matter what anyone else thinks or tells you. You will know.
If this experiment did work and remote viewing actually works for you, then don't run around trying to convince anyone that remove viewing works. People are generally stupidly;y entrenched in their fossilized view of the world. Trying to convince them that what they think is wrong will only lead to fear, anger and accusations.
Thank youuu so much for this exercise 🙌 for years I have been able to see places and people like in a flash in my eyes mind but it took me years to comprehend what I was seeing and who was all these people in my mind ...it was a bit crazy I thought I was going bananas but now I see that is remote view!!!!
This is exactly what I told my friend the other day. I don't talk to anyone who hasn't read the necessary literature, like William James, Edgar Cayce, Ingo Swann, Jeffrey Mishlove, Russel Targ, Dean Radin and so forth...
As a very skeptical person who just happened upon the video because I've been looking into classified projects such as Project Stargate, MKUltra etc, I have to say: What the fuck. I tried out what you said and on my first attempt I guessed correctly that there was a lynx on the random page of my passport I inserted a coin into.
Then I went to grab an entire book with images that was about Trees and Bushes of (My country), inserted a coin and had to concentrate for about 5 minutes. I then began to imagine a tall tree that had a very obvious clearing below it (unlike spruces this tree was 50% empty at the bottom), I was very confused since I also saw a white bush type growth that extended vertically upwards and thinned at the top. I assumed maybe that's because there were 2 separate plants on the page but when I opened it up finally I got shocked. It was the European horse-chestnut tree. A tree that has a clearing at the bottom with buds that are white and shaped like a christmas tree. Although my drawing wasn't completely accurate.. they were still very close to the real thing as best as I could draw them. My main mistake was that I drew regular leaves but this tree has pear shaped leaves.
Thanks to your comment and me experimenting with this, I'll probably spend tens of hours of my free time looking into this. I'm baffled.. still a skeptic though but way less so.
Absolutely correct.
I do remote viewing as well. I would like to say that one of my first tries to do this was scary accurate. I saw through my wife's eyes for 1 minute, and I saw in my mind's eye that she was on her phone, I was thinking RUclips videos but the application was blue not red.
It turned out that she was on her phone, and looking at audio books that play like a video on Hoopla, and their platform is in blue, not red.
You can't just use everything you see in your minds eye. You have to try to listen, smell, see, and wait for a feeling to tell you if you have a hit or if you're just guessing. Hence why alot of people end up with misses to wash out the legit hits.
Literally, anyone can do this. However, like everything else, some will do very well, and some not so good. This is real, and if it wasn't for my personal experience in RV, than I wouldn't believe it for a minute.
True
Ingo Swann said remote viewing was not psychic phenomenon but a natural ability.
It is you have it to if you just set your mind to it if you doubt your self it will never happen
Jessica Utts is one of the best explainers of using statistical means for understanding things I've encountered. I found her several modifications of the intereviewer's questions to be a good example of that.
Fascinating interview. She is not all what the stereotype of a statistician is like.
Speaking from personal experience, consciousness and perception are not restricted to the typically perceived linear flow of spacetime. If you want find out for yourself, drop your preconceptions and do your own experiments.
This is all incredible! A month ago I read about Ingo Swamp and just now reading "Mind Trek" from Joseph McMonEagle. All about Remote viewing. Finally in the book just finished, Dr. Utts is on page 225 and 225 on the NCR report. Finally, in the interned all I have now it is all about Remote Viewing. First time in my life I see all of these things together. Talk about "Premonitions"????
Dr. Jessica is so wise. I'm impressed with how right she is, especially in her criticism for the small group of people in scientific leadership positions who are outright deniers rather than healthy skeptics and discourage further research into this unexplained phenomena. Outright denial rather than further research is simply unacademic and is doing society a disservice.
What a great interview. First time watching both of them. Dr. Utts is so down-to-earth and accessible, while Mr. Kelly carried out an excellent interview. He's well prepared, well researched, with great questions, interaction, rhythm. Simply perfect! It's a delight to watch. I'm even leaving a like 🤩🥳 which I rarely do 😅
“There was a classified program being done at Stanford Research Institute” AKA project star gate (MKUltra)
Yepp ;)
The way she so calmly describes MKUltra as a data source is... Eeesh
They should put remote viewers in an fMRI machine to see what areas of the brain are producing BOLD signals during "target lock"
Visual Cortex may show signal and NMRI I went into all that with scant results ♦ an actual chi-psychic event may not show eeg-phenomenon
Surely it's been done. Very interesting
Dang. Now that is an idea. That would be an interesting study
They did they said nothing was detected
Hemisphere synchronization theta brain waves
Fascinating interview. Dave Kelly asked excellent questions and certainly did his homework. And Jessica Utts turned me from a skeptic to a complete believer in remote viewing.
I actually met a member of the remoteviewing team that was at Ft Meade, although I didnt know at the time what he was doing. I was assigned to NSA and he was down at "The Box". One day while I was in the arts and crafts building and he came in looking to have a plaque made. We shook hands and exchanged introductions during which I asked him "so what do you guys do over there", to which he answered "I could tell you, but Id have to kill you". A classic answer given by members of the intelligence community. I can still remember driving past his building on more than one occasion and feeling a powerful urge to just knock on the door. I wish now that I had. It was a year or so later in a tiny bookstore on a tiny NSGA in Scotland that I came across his book "Psychic Warrior". I read his book and it set me on a path of discovery that still fascinates me decades later.
I had been remoteviewing for a little while and was utterly obsessed with it but unable to find people to share my new hobby with. Even family members were uninterested. One day I was driving along as I excitedly told my wife about having successful RVd a target when she suddenly became very annoyed. She explained that it was all a bunch of nonsense to her and that she wished I'd stop talking about it. I asked her to take out her phone, go to Google and search images and pick an image at random and I would demonstrate remoteviewing. She chose an image and kept her phone turned away from me. I then proceeded to tell her that the image was a wooded area. On the right was a large clearing or meadow that had hundreds or thousands of little blue flowers growing in it. On the left there were trees, but there was something else very close in the foreground that I couldn't quite make out. Something big and brown. Something about the size of the steering wheel. I asked her "so how did I do". She just sat there with a stunned look on her face before saying " how is this possible, I don't understand". At the next light she showed me the picture. A wooded area with trees to the left, a field to the right and little blue flowers everywhere. In the foreground on the left was the face of a large brown bear. Its head about the size of a steering wheel.
A few days later I was taking my son to his friend's house when out of the blue he said " hey dad, you really spooked mom the other day. She said you remoteviwed a picture she had picked at random and you got it right." I told him my side of the story and asked if he wanted to test me. He got out his phone and a second or two later said ok, got one. I said. The picture is of two buildings. The one on the left is an older stone building with lots of ornate features. The one on the right is a modern glass and steel building. There is a patch of blue sky between them and above them that forms a T shape. The picture that he showed me perfectly matched my description. He was very impressed.
I do remote viewing as well. I would like to say that one of my first tries to do this was scary accurate. I saw through my wife's eyes for 1 minute, and I saw in my mind's eye that she was on her phone, I was thinking RUclips videos but the application was blue not red.
It turned out that she was on her phone, and looking at audio books that play like a video on Hoopla, and their platform is in blue, not red.
You can't just use everything you see in your minds eye. You have to try to listen, smell, see, and wait for a feeling to tell you if you have a hit or if you're just guessing. Hence why alot of people end up with misses to wash out the legit hits.
Literally, anyone can do this. However, like everything else, some will do very well, and some not so good. This is real, and if it wasn't for my personal experience in RV, than I wouldn't believe it for a minute.
When she talks about people sabotaging our own abilities it’s true if you fiend yourself stugeling with stuff then sit back and breath and just let your pain and anger go away.
Well, I kinda wish I'd have seen this sooner rather than later. Dr. Courtney Brown is a great one to look up for remote viewing info and training. Dr. Jeffrey Mishlove for information and interviews with all of the participants from SRI. Thanks for the interesting interview!
A clear and competent voice on this important topic, great work!
Dr. Utts, Bravo, bravo!!👏👏
Here it is a real scientific mind ready to accept scientific evidence despite the fact of being skeptical at the beginning.
The problem with the people that's referenced as skeptical in this video, is that they don't present skeptical behavior but, yes, they present dogmatic behavior. Dogma is on the opposite side of where science should always be. I don't believe that these people have a dogmatic nature, the truth is that these people have a second agenda that has nothing to do with science. An agenda that is either just about personal career, status quo, or financial. We don't even need any kind of conspiracy to explain they behavior. It's just personal and social psychology. Human nature.
Well put Mario, muito bem!
Exactly. I've had this conversation with "edgy" 15 year old atheists who have made science their religion. I was trying to explain to them that scientists today are often behaving dogmatic and unscientific. Arrogant for the most part. And they call me "anti science". I believe in the scientific method, not scientists. They're only human.
I'm a skeptical person by nature, but like Dr. Utts said.. It's one thing to be skeptical and another to be a denier. That's what, I would assume, most scientists are today... Deniers. It's ironic that we have to convince scientists to have an open mind.
@@MisterCovek ..Great points! Great minds are not fixated, great minds have an openness to explore a deeper understanding of other points of view..
One of the best interviews in general. Great questions, timing, and respect for the subject. People could watch this video for tips, no matter what you are talking about.
Thank you for this. Having had several precognitive experiences in my life this video has helped assuage some doubts about the validity of those moments.
Surprised at the length of this video but really appreciate the depth of questioning. Well done! And as a side note, these days we know about quantum entanglement, and that the electron is here, there and everywhere. Somewhere between the two lies the answer. Maybe. What about folks with photographic memory.
I have beem trying to find something like this for years! I get i guess RV. it started when I was 10. i seen my grandma pass away. next moring got a call saying she passed. 2 days before my dad came up missing I woke up couldn't breath I called my sister thinking that it was her. the feeling lasted for a couple of hrs (I know when its real and when its not because I will get emotional) we found out that my dad was on life support in a hospital. they never called us. I knew that my dad was going to pass a month before he did. my friend I knew was going to pass away at 3am. 7am got a txt saying he passed. Here I thought I was crazy! I was told they were premonitions and was told I am cursed. 😢 I want to learn more about this.
Beautiful interviewer.
Beautiful interviewee.
Beautiful interview.
Thanks to dr.Utts and to this tv show Talking Points!
Meanwhile for decades people claiming to have ESP were ridiculously ridiculed.
If you cannot connect your spirit and your mind in the present and read it, with all the advantages of the body, then you will not read elsewhere and elsewhen without it.
Try to understand what trust moves like, what light smells like and that there's music in the simple routines of strangers. They are you, after all.
Interesting...can you please elaborate on 'what trust moves like'?
The host made his homework very well. Nice job 👍
Fascinating and a fantastic interview
I am a little surprised that Dr. Utts was around these remote viewers she talks about and does not know more about them and how they got involved in remote viewing- their stories are truly interesting.
The idea of remote viewing received renewed attention in the 1990s upon the declassification of documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program sponsored by the U.S. government that attempted to determine potential military applications of psychic phenomena.
Some of the best Remote Viewers in the world such as, Physicists Russell Targ, Harold Puthoff, parapsychology
researchers at Stanford Research Institute (SRI), and Major Ed Dames who ended up running the program, worked specific top-secret cases with a very high degree of accuracy.
Among many other successful examples, from a small room at a university in the US, they once identified the exact location of a building in Russia where a nuclear submarine was being built.
Over the last 50 years or so the Remote Viewing process has been fine tuned and teams of the very best RV experts are often assembled to conduct RV Projects which produce astounding results.
For example, as related to charity work conducted by Major Ed Dames who used to run the government RV programs decades ago, a highly skilled elite RV Team will be assembled to work together collectively with a 100% degree of accuracy when helping parents find the bodies of missing children. The children's bodies are ALWAYS FOUND 100% of the time within 50 feet of the RV target location found during the sessions conducted by the elite team.
I was a bit skeptical at first until I watched some of the best Remote Viewers conduct some incredible remote viewing projects that can be viewed at the Farsight Institute located at (Farsight Dot Org.)
Use Duckduckgo dot com instead of Google which likes to hide things, and search the term Farsight. The first result is the website for Farsight Institute.
Some projects that I found to be particularly amazing, which can be found on the left side margin under the heading (Free Projects), were the projects entitled The JFK Assassination, and the 911/Project. Enjoy 😉
25:26 Neil De Grasse Tyson is the best example of an academic who needs to get with the program.
Good to know. I've been relying on my intuition a lot in my life, but if you say the effect is only 1/3 instead of 1/4 among people who certainly claim to have a talent in the field, then I'd rather put more effort to actively employ my brain to any decision making.
Still this is an extremely interesting analysis
What an excellent interview
Great show! Love this. The host looks like Dr Strange in a facade or two.
Very interesting. Have been quietly Doing it quietly since my twenties And have helped lots of people.
Now that Shane has posted that video comment section will blow ig
I’ve had this. You definitely have to not be aware you’re doing it in my experience ✌🏼
I don't know why but I can see his breath
Here after Shane's video
Same
If Richard Feynman was still alive... and had a conversation with her.... that would be the most interesting conversation ever recorded.
I think a mix of entanglement, and pre-determinism is the answer.
who else is here from Shane’s new video?
When she mentions precognition and tuning into your own future that reminds me of the feeling of deja vu. I’m wondering if the strong sense of deja vu is just your past self accidentally getting glimpses of your future or “tuning in” to your future self as she put it.
Woah, I thought you were going to say something like: "I wonder if deja vu is the subconscious process of tuning into precognitive abilities for a moment." but you also bring up an interesting idea
11:33 highlighting her conclusion
I can remote view n it's not something that's hard to do for me it's fairly simple for me I can turn it on or turn it off n all it takes for me is light
wow thank you so much! what a great interview!
Thanks, Shane!
Shane’s video got me coming here
Thanks
Thanks for the video I am a bit skeptical about the nature of psychics and remote viewers.
As a dowser, and tried some rv'g, I'm always agog at how good these people are. I'm good at dowsing, but rv'g is not so good at all. But my point is this; it works; and seriously well with the right individual who is skilled at it.
Why do you think the CIA, Mossad, and the KGB/FSB spent gazillions on recruiting and training people to do it. It is still used by many outfits of varying names and purposes.
One example was of a guy who the CIA had trained/used, and had to revoke his passport because on a certain day, he identified the position of every nuclear sub in the US Navy. True story.
Well ..the Military has used it for decades..so if these ppl questioning now..I'd say they are pretty far behind in their research.🙄
I love psychics some how it became addicting but I’m slowly winging myself off cause I feel like I came across more scammer then the real deals some have told me things that happened others definitely made me feel like I’m feeling now
Omg how did i not know about this. When i was a teen i always had things like this xD. As an example, there was this one guy and for reason i always knew what he was doing. And i was always right. And so much more lol
I totaly lost this and i hate it. Im def gonna dive into this 🙃
thanks. this was great.
telepathy and metaphysics are both real
Anyone here after the Shane Dawson video ?!
I do not know if remote viewing is real but it seems some organizations have real remote viewer like the WEF who predicted the bat coronavirus attack while the NTI predicted one year in advance almost to the day, the monkeypox attack.
Its very very likely real, so experiment for yourself and sidestep the potential of people lying to you.
Who is paying the "debunkers"? Follow the money..
Knud Sandbæk Nielsen 👍👌👏
Anyone can be a debunker. You can i can. They dont have to pay us. Skeptics do videos and research. There are no debunkers because they cant debunk this.
ok but why no one can explane me how to do that?
🖐❤🏜 It seems that theoretical physicists have agreed upon nonlocality, nonlocal causality, as real phenomena. In light of that, why question the ability to remote view?
Blessing you xx
20:10 "re: training people". Could it be that there isn't training really and that instead, it is testing (while telling the participants they are being trained) and then using statistics to find the stars? It would be interesting if any of those that were trained realized they were just being tested.
The simplest answer to all of that, check physicist and author: Tom Campbell
I was looking for a connection from this stuff to him eventually
Will have to get around to finishing his book sometime
I’m about 100 pages in to My Big TOE so far. I found this video as I wanted more proof of the possibility of remote viewing. Tom describes being able to consistently and reliably remote view, but glosses over the evidence for this. I want to believe, but, I’m finding it hard so far. Does he divulge further explanations for his lab results later in the book?
Amazing!
Did y’all come from Shane Dawson’s video too?
Here bc of Shane Dawson
Im here after watching the Shane Dawson video
always remember, "your endorsement isn't necessary for this to be real / accurate".
That "need" seems to always, kinda, screws
things up! - thats been my observation anyway... sincerely....
We spy on them because they spy on us because we spy on them etc.
David Grusch sent me here
Shane brought me here 😅
Here from Shane
Omg I done it and 4 out of 6 things I got right!!!!!! Wtffff
Shane
Here after Shane Dawson ESP theory
IAM ALL THREE
Of course its real humanity lost this natural ability century's ago
Shane