Upgrade to an ATC

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 июл 2024
  • Do you want to save time changing tools? Automate it with the ‪@PwnCNC‬ ATC. I'll share my surprise favorite feature and three things you should know before purchasing one.
    If you feel the need to support my efforts in some way, I offer two options:
    Patreon: / uglydogwoodshop -- includes a bunch of free digital models for the Digital Downloads tier.
    CashApp: cash.app/$UglyDogWoodshop -- if you just want to make a one time contribution of any amount you pick.
    Save 5% at PwnCNC with the coupon code: UGLYDOG
    Buy one now at: pwncnc.com/products/atc?ref=q...
    0:00 Introduction
    0:54 Packaging
    1:15 First Installation Video
    2:28 Issue Number One
    3:39 Second Install Video
    4:02 Issue Number Two
    8:36 Half of the Solution
    8:50 The Other Half
    9:45 Surprise Favorite Feature
    10:49 Problem Number Three
    12:44 The Workaround
    13:33 The Fix
    14:39 Wrap Up
    The above link is an affiliate link. I would love it if you use that link for your PwnCNC purchases. I get a small amount from sales via that link, which helps me produce content like this.

Комментарии • 6

  • @paulroberts3577
    @paulroberts3577 2 месяца назад +1

    I appreciate you sharing your experience and you solutions. Thanks

  • @lylefranksaunders2113
    @lylefranksaunders2113 2 месяца назад

    Go and look at the Rappidchange ATC, 10% of the cost and 10% of the complexity

    • @UglyDogWoodshop
      @UglyDogWoodshop  2 месяца назад

      I looked at it before, and I took another look just now. I'm sure that's a great product for a lot of people, but it's not for me. It doesn't support enough tools. If you could add two of the 12 units together, to get the same capacity I have, it's about the same price as the PwnCNC one. the dust boot issue looks like it's at least a much of a challenge as it was for the PwnCNC system. I'm also concerned about the tools being mounted in exactly the same position each time, which is important if you hope to speed up the process by skipping the tool setter for each change. I'd be happy to give one a try, but for me, I don't think it's a great fit.