Jok Rault this was in 1962 so they didn't have a large tank fleet then like they do now plus they didn't have good air power so that's why they were pushed back
Reality is that Switzerland was expecting for soviet invasion, with hidden defenses all across the mountains that it sits on, but it would be using defenses that are as old as WWI. Even then, the soviet union would have been wasting its time trying to invade it anyways.
But even that time Finland wasn't allied in the way or another. Soviets wanted to "secure the border of Leningrad", because apparently Finns were some sort of huge threat to them. You know, 3,8 million against 200 million. Clearly Soviet Unions existence was at stake there. After Winter war Finland chose Germany naturally.
The USSR would probably have halted after taking germany, scandinavia and turkey. Occupying france and italy was not in their interestsm as the costs would be high and it would force NATO to liberate rather than negotiate.
@Josip Marušić dude stop thinking France is a country of coward you're the one coward here the leader of France during this scenario was Charles Charles Gaulle and he knew capitulation wasn't a solution so stfu
If you guys want to, check out this video, its a shitty map day by day WWI war video I made, up to you if you want to check it out ruclips.net/video/RvshYwds3b4/видео.html
The German KaiserReich in ww1 invaded Russia and won with help of socialist rebellion and Sweden didn't actually defeat Russia it lost in the great northern war against Russia cuz they invaded them... In the winter
The only way for N. A. T. O. to win an ipothetycal war with the soviets was to stop them on the Rhine or on the French borders, wich was probable to succeed, if France falled, N. A. T. O. could have still won the war but the public opinion would force them to negotiate instead of fought a bloody, multi year, possibly nuclear war.
By the time war was declared the Soviets had lost. They easily would've taken West Germany. However NATO forces would have complete control of the skies. American strategic bombers would flood into the Europe destroying ports, infrastructure, supplies, soviet cities, and munitions. The Soviets would have a very hard time trying to get past the Alpine Mountains into Italy, and they wouldn't have been able to take control of the seas, thusly being unable to launch an invasion into southern Italy. Soviet forces would take Northern France as they do outnumber them, however it is becoming increasingly difficult as American and Canadian reinforcements keep on arriving en mass, they are being constantly beaten and battered by British and American tactical bombers and jets, and their supply lines are over extended, constantly being bombed. I think that the Soviet advance would cut off with most of the Alpine region in their control, West Germany, Turkey, and Northern France. However as more and more British, American and Canadian troops pour in, including armored divisions with superior tanks and technology pour into southern France the Soviets are halted. An allied landing in Northern France would happen as the Soviets would have had enough time to reinforce the Coast. Meanwhile a NATO counter offensive in Southern France would take place. I think your video was very accurate.
Yeah, that was what I thought, but the Soviets had an initial land superiority the allies couldn't match in a short term. Plus, they had the surprise factor, in the first months allied casualities nearly doubled Soviet ones. About the landing, it was done with paratroopers and support of the small Italian and Greek fleet (The Greek army was divided and several units which were communsit switched sides, including part of the navy which was taken in an incident). Landing such an excessive amount of troops in Europe would leave other fronts of the war (Such as Korea) without real NATO protection and the US would not like that. That's why the Soviet advance projected further than you would think at the beginning.
@Saint 4-0 Economic, industrial power, and numerical superiority, which in ww2 they have been demonstrated useless. Remember, USSR has had 24mln casualties between soldiers and civs. They don't have economical and industrial power to match richer Europe, Usa and allies countries. That's because communism is limited to internal production, and almost no trading. They have almost no real allied countries, let alone that can match Usa allies. They don't have importan military structures outside mother Russia, so they can't sustain logistically a war in Europe, let alone a global war. By the time the European forces resist to gain time for Americans to come, USSR would just start struggling to keep up with supplies.
@Saint 4-0 Nato Forces reunited togheter, counted more soldiers than warsaw pact (much more allied countries), but to mobilize all the usa and allied forces (like japan), they need a lot of time, and that's a point in favor of the Ussr. I think that Nato could atleast regain Europe by fighting back, but they will not be probably able to invade Russia because it is a very difficult campaign, so yeah, it will be a stallmate at most.
In 1962 I was a child and we lived 2 miles from Moffet Field in the heart of Silicon Valley. I remember the Cuban Missile Crisis well because I never saw adults cry and act hysterically. Now, after 37 years with DoD I know how we felt in '62..
That part in Czechoslovakia where they started to liberate the Czech portions and then almost lost as the American and British lines caught up gave me goose bumps
AirZazi It was initially to be given to Hungary, but since Hungary staid loyal to the Soviets it was ceded to Czechoslovakia as a "gift" for rising up against the Soviet control.
I always liked how the Western people imagine war. Like in cheap action movies. First one side of the conflict (in the representation of Western man "evil/bad guys") wins a solid victory, and then, suddenly, good guys (in the representation of Western man) fights back and winning. It is ridiculous.
1) in the 1960s, commie had one of the best aviation in the world. So who will beat whom - this is another question. 2) Look at 2.07. Germany and France are defeated. Who defeated the Warsaw Pact? Of worthy opponents, there remained only England. In real life, in this case, England would settle on its island and protect them. England would not even try to carry out the offensive. How England did this during the Second World War. About Spain, I generally keep quiet - seriously perceive Spain is simply ridiculous. The United States would not have been able to send as many amphibious forces into Europe as it could to keep the entire European front. The US simply did not have enough transport ships for this. So... WHO could defeat the Communists from 2.07? This video just does not make sense. Either the commie lose earlier, or the commie do not lose at all. The scenario described in the video is absolutely stupid and unrealistic.
If you guys want to, check out this video, its a shitty map day by day WWI war video I made, up to you if you want to check it out ruclips.net/video/RvshYwds3b4/видео.html
WOW. This is one of the best WW 3 scenarios ever. Honestly, I couldn't understand why there would be hate on this (except all this ultra nationalists maybe...they hate everything). Excellent video!
Bruh in every single one of these it reaches a certain point then apparently the ussr gives up and starts retreating?! That is total bs even if it is alternative. Every one does this in alternative ww3, Russia invades most of Europe, then apparently Spain is a super power and wins magically.
Some corrections: 1-Some territories of Yugoslavia would be annexed by the invaders, such as Kosovo to Albania, Macedonia to Bulgaria and Vojvodina to Hungary. 2-Israel would not be dominated easily, it would probably have been the same as the Six Day War, and then it would have turned into a bloody conflict without any progress. 3-Turkey and Iran would not be easily invaded either, as they have mountains and a powerful army. 4-San Marino, Andorra and Cyprus would not have been invaded, as they do not have any strategic value. 5-The war would end up becoming nuclear, whether when France saw that defeat was imminent, and especially when NATO forces began to enter Soviet territory, the USSR would use nuclear weapons as a last resort.
Had that happened, a decent part of Silesia and Pomerania (in 1965 most of the Poles living there were Galacians who would've it as going home), probably up to Danzig with Poland getting Königsberg instead, would have been given to Germany.
Fun fact: I was just waiting that some fucking Russian will come and say "This is not realistic, ofcourse not, Russia stronk, Russia great, yeeh yeeh!". Pasho nahui, blyat.
The only reason why the advance from the Vistula to the Moskva was too fast (e.g. March 21 to May 30) was because of overextension in the Soviet armed forces after losing so much men in the battle for Europe.
The Warsaw Pact would have never advanced all the way to Spain and wouldn’t capitulate Greece and Turkey. Also why would they invade neutral Sweden, Finland and Yugoslavia?
Every Warsaw Pact vs NATO video: 1. USSR takes over Europe 2. USA starts an offensive in Africa 3. USA magically finds 15million soldiers to start a massive invasion in France and/or Scandinavia. 4. Soviet Union collapses like wet shit 5. Soviet casualties: 40M US casualties: 400-500k
Pretty much......and I wonder how in every darn scenario, they somehow seem to manage to avoid the use of nuclear weapons entirely.....the risk for that would have always grown bigger when the other side would have been cornered....which is why these kind of scenarios are unrealistic in the first place and why Cold War never heated up into WW3.
Total Crap... not just incredible unrealistic in multiple ways at once, in addition to that you draw random frontiers without any explaination why you think that thinks could have happened in that way.... Waste of time to watch. Give explaination and there might open up some interessting discussion topic but not like that.
UNREALISTIC besides the Soviet Union had global domination in common with the Nazis. They never did it cuz America was a thing (and like the soviets, had a lot of atom bombs) with them around its like 2 bullies afraid to fight each other cuz neither of em wanna get hurt
не реалистично, через 48 после начала заварушки согласно военной доктрине ссср, танки должны стоят уже рядом с ла-маншем, и по факту ничего не остановило бы продвижение войск ссср, ну кроме ядерного оружия :-)
Indeed, no one likes war. By the way, I had the intention to abandon the project, but when I saw your own WW3 every day, I thought "Whoah, this looks so damn great, I'll definetely continue with my own".
Szczepaniak Robert What made the USA so powerful was that it was never involved in a costly war as the Second World War. As a result of that, the USA's industry wasn't as badly damaged as USSRs, Polands or rest of Eastern Europe.
1:30 Russia takes revenge against Napoleon after 150 years xD But I tkink, that this scenario would be so good. Western Europe would feel for a year what felt Eastern Europe during 45 years, and I like vision after war, much better that real 1991.
To tje ones who thought Warsaw pact will emerge victorious, let me explain why they will always lose ALL Warsaw pact members have a significantly smaller economies than their western counterparts, during the 60's the US economy was reaching the point, where its economy was nearly twice the soviet economy, during the 70's Japan claimed silver in the worlds largest Economy, surpassing the combined economy of Warsaw Pact, also, the USSR has a numerous amount of Minor ethnic groups, some hate the rule of Moscow, not only that, the USSR, despite having a larger population than USA, it doesn't have the resources to win a long war surpassing 2 years, a year long conflict was deemed the best scenario for the soviets, taking in how they lasted longer during WW2 the answer is simple Lend Lease Program, that's right, the USSR survived WW2, because of the Lend lease Program, 15% of all equipment the USSR used, came from the USA, doesn't seem much, how about the 60% of all steel the USSR used came drom USA, over 80% of all food the soviet populace ate was US war rations, in other words, it was the US that kept the USSR from starving to death, and helped out produce the Germans. Now how does this affect the soviets 20 years later? The soviets actually placed a Strict economy rule, if you don't make the required production, the Government will give you resources, meaning, to increase the production, the Soviet's had to throw tons of resources, and the plant managers can always find ways to make the plant under perform, this was a problem that the Communist party failed to find a solution, as the Communist party relied on them In other words, the soviet economy was ill-suited to support a war, yhe industrial sector was doing fine, the Agricultural sector has much to be desired from, and the Army, was using T-55 tanks as the Main tank, the T-62 failed and the T-64 was reserver for elite units, ehich there are very few of, as the Soviets conscripted men into the Army
@@galaxyred7 1. Spain is not the only one fighting, American troops and nato troops are there fighting with Spain 2. The supply range is very stretched so that frontline is not supplied enough 3. The Soviet Union was at the verge of collapse so it added more problems to the moral of troops. 4. Don’t say this isn’t realistic because look at Ww2 the Germans basically took all of Europe and they still lost.
There is an error in your video. When the city of Istanbul is captured, Turkey loses the war, but our capital has been Ankara since 1923. In other words, for Turkey to be defeated, Ankara must be captured.
Ikr, I know it’s unrealistic, but the video needs have a bit of sense in it to make it enjoyable! How the hell did Spain turn into a superpower as soon as the Soviets arrived?!
Not sure what all the dislikes are for (unless some people would really love to live in a communist world), but I honestly love this. Liked and favorited, thanks for the vid
Nope, in reality, nuclear war will start way before conventional war starts, that stems from different military doctrines of NATO and WP/WTO, Americans, British, and French would only use tactical nukes on the last resort basis to stop the advance of Soviet tank formations, Soviets on other hand is willing to escalate the conventional war into a nuclear one "earlier," they were planning to drop nukes on Denmark, West Germany, Austria, and northern Italy before WP armored and mechanized units advance.
![[DOKKAN BATTLE] Worldwide Campaign Announcement Video Part 2!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JpT5Voak6WA/mqdefault.jpg)
Songs
-Ryan Amon - The Raven
-Mark Petrie - Virtuous
the music went well, ty
Jok Rault this was in 1962 so they didn't have a large tank fleet then like they do now plus they didn't have good air power so that's why they were pushed back
In 1962 the sovjets had 10,000+ of T-54/55 tanks, so yes they had a big tank fleet.
Drex I didn't know they had that many thanks
thatrandomguy2004 There were about 40.000 T-54/55 built between 1947 and early 1962, then the T-62 came out and kind of replaced the older T-54/55.
Switzerland is like..- whats going on around me:-))
lol
Christ Derondolo Algeria is probably like that too
Christ Derondolo for the third time...
Christ Derondolo österreich wird euch erobern mit russlandd hehehe
Reality is that Switzerland was expecting for soviet invasion, with hidden defenses all across the mountains that it sits on, but it would be using defenses that are as old as WWI. Even then, the soviet union would have been wasting its time trying to invade it anyways.
At least Italy fought until the end...
Power Mapper The never died the went to retired to Sicily
Hugary -countryball lololol yeeeeeees
And then he thought, that Sylvester Stallone was on his best element when he was old, so it's worth the shot. And it succeeded.
No, Don Corleone was resurrected and killed the soviets mafia style.
Polan FREE
Spain is like: NO!!! YOU WONT TOUCH MY DEAR PORTUGAL
Charlio xD
Shut op Charlio
@@alexgaminggb7028 why? are you a fan of USSR and likes death? well go to war you'd see alot of dead peoples.
@@guester_blaster2013 wtf i hate USSR
@@alexgaminggb7028 so why shut up?
Love how the UK's always that one Allied nation which carries on as their friends fall around them
Thats the good thing about being an island but at the same time your isolated from everyone else
Laughs in British
@Rizeli Caner that is true
@@lordmaguire1862 :0 wanna recolonize Africa and India and torture them?
@@Sovola i cant because of the *cough cough*
USSR: I'm going to win this war
Spain: Hold my paella
Lmao
do you mean cerveza
Olee!
Russians conquering Finland? This scenario is unrealistic!
Well Finland and Sweden weren't in NATO and shouldn't of even been in the war.
Purple Fox Winter War.
The winter war was in the 1940s.
Purple Fox Yes but USSR need iron from Sweden , but first they have to conquer Finland
But even that time Finland wasn't allied in the way or another. Soviets wanted to "secure the border of Leningrad", because apparently Finns were some sort of huge threat to them. You know, 3,8 million against 200 million. Clearly Soviet Unions existence was at stake there. After Winter war Finland chose Germany naturally.
USSR: you can't take us on, we have winter!
NATO: waits till spring
USSR: *Confused screaming*
Just ussr attack
Switzerland in all World Wars: Ahh this movie is very cool
The USSR would probably have halted after taking germany, scandinavia and turkey. Occupying france and italy was not in their interestsm as the costs would be high and it would force NATO to liberate rather than negotiate.
@Josip Marušić dude stop thinking France is a country of coward you're the one coward here the leader of France during this scenario was Charles Charles Gaulle and he knew capitulation wasn't a solution so stfu
Thx to sicilians and saudi arabs they saved world in this scenerio
@Josip Marušić no they wouldn't. France would use nuclear weapon due to our nuclear policy
If you guys want to, check out this video, its a shitty map day by day WWI war video I made, up to you if you want to check it out
ruclips.net/video/RvshYwds3b4/видео.html
Switzerland and Algeria are enjoying peace lol
Monaco little dot between Spain and France too
Natallia Vakula no Andorra got conquered too
Because Algeria,Morroco are not europe! And plus Switzerland is neutral!
@@AnimationFanboy2k4 Finland and West germany and italy were neutral too during the Cold war
Ireland too
Just look at switzerland chilling in the middle of a war.
Wow, Switzerland, great moves, keep it up, proud of you
Verreck Im Gulag *goes to the German -Swiss border (Swiss side)* *grabs popcorn*
Like always
Thanks! I have done well being neutral and healing others.
General Goldy yeah the swiss nuklear bombs
EDIT: Historians: there's no one who can invade Russia. Mongolia and NATO: Hold my beer.
The German KaiserReich in ww1 invaded Russia and won with help of socialist rebellion and Sweden didn't actually defeat Russia it lost in the great northern war against Russia cuz they invaded them... In the winter
Poland also succesfully invade Rusian, rusians even celebrate day when ocupation was over (Unity Day).
@@darlenekhin thay lost becuse 9f a rebellion
@@panakap2186 but did notdefeat them
Nato. Never invaded russia yet
All Alternate History WW3 scenarios:
Warsaw Pact takes nearly everything with ease
NATO Retakes everything and wins
NationalismBG because that’s a realistic 1960s ww3
@@thescorch1163 no its not its bull shit watch if the warsaw pact went to war with NATO then come back
I mean we can’t know for sure because we have two sides arguing who would win : /
The only way for N. A. T. O. to win an ipothetycal war with the soviets was to stop them on the Rhine or on the French borders, wich was probable to succeed, if France falled, N. A. T. O. could have still won the war but the public opinion would force them to negotiate instead of fought a bloody, multi year, possibly nuclear war.
@@Philip54622 Yes because america comes.
Switzerland
*Has never entered the chat.*
@Hammerschlägen M Now that is a great question.
2:51 let's stop the offencive for the winter.
@Honza Popule nicely done
By the time war was declared the Soviets had lost. They easily would've taken West Germany. However NATO forces would have complete control of the skies. American strategic bombers would flood into the Europe destroying ports, infrastructure, supplies, soviet cities, and munitions. The Soviets would have a very hard time trying to get past the Alpine Mountains into Italy, and they wouldn't have been able to take control of the seas, thusly being unable to launch an invasion into southern Italy.
Soviet forces would take Northern France as they do outnumber them, however it is becoming increasingly difficult as American and Canadian reinforcements keep on arriving en mass, they are being constantly beaten and battered by British and American tactical bombers and jets, and their supply lines are over extended, constantly being bombed. I think that the Soviet advance would cut off with most of the Alpine region in their control, West Germany, Turkey, and Northern France. However as more and more British, American and Canadian troops pour in, including armored divisions with superior tanks and technology pour into southern France the Soviets are halted. An allied landing in Northern France would happen as the Soviets would have had enough time to reinforce the Coast. Meanwhile a NATO counter offensive in Southern France would take place. I think your video was very accurate.
Yeah, that was what I thought, but the Soviets had an initial land superiority the allies couldn't match in a short term. Plus, they had the surprise factor, in the first months allied casualities nearly doubled Soviet ones. About the landing, it was done with paratroopers and support of the small Italian and Greek fleet (The Greek army was divided and several units which were communsit switched sides, including part of the navy which was taken in an incident). Landing such an excessive amount of troops in Europe would leave other fronts of the war (Such as Korea) without real NATO protection and the US would not like that. That's why the Soviet advance projected further than you would think at the beginning.
Drex Makes sense.
blackmesa232323
I'm glad someone could make such a good comment ^_^
@Saint 4-0 Economic, industrial power, and numerical superiority, which in ww2 they have been demonstrated useless. Remember, USSR has had 24mln casualties between soldiers and civs. They don't have economical and industrial power to match richer Europe, Usa and allies countries. That's because communism is limited to internal production, and almost no trading. They have almost no real allied countries, let alone that can match Usa allies. They don't have importan military structures outside mother Russia, so they can't sustain logistically a war in Europe, let alone a global war. By the time the European forces resist to gain time for Americans to come, USSR would just start struggling to keep up with supplies.
@Saint 4-0 Nato Forces reunited togheter, counted more soldiers than warsaw pact (much more allied countries), but to mobilize all the usa and allied forces (like japan), they need a lot of time, and that's a point in favor of the Ussr. I think that Nato could atleast regain Europe by fighting back, but they will not be probably able to invade Russia because it is a very difficult campaign, so yeah, it will be a stallmate at most.
And of course, Switzerland is being usual itself during a war.
Why would the USSR attack Yugoslavia? They were neutral. so there would have been mo reason to attack them.
Maybe resources?
maybe autor is dumb
+Nick Savin
Maybe?
Yugoslavia wasnt neutral it was its own communist state
Yugoslavia was in non-aligned movement.
In 1962 I was a child and we lived 2 miles from Moffet Field in the heart of Silicon Valley. I remember the Cuban Missile Crisis well because I never saw adults cry and act hysterically. Now, after 37 years with DoD I know how we felt in '62..
Spain resists and then the good disengage
The land of the free will always win over oppression! 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
That part in Czechoslovakia where they started to liberate the Czech portions and then almost lost as the American and British lines caught up gave me goose bumps
Czechoslovakia? Its Czech Republic and Slovakia bro 💀💀💀 Czechoslovakia doesnt exits anymore
@@natlik5326 bro u dum af, obviously he means the country in the video and it has a name so...
Lmao what czechoslovakia doesnt exist anymore. Everyone referst to it by Czech Repulic and Slovakia they are both seperated💀
@@natlik5326 the video shows Czechoslovakia. And he also said the "Czech portions" so I don't know what your complaining about
Also Hungary and Poland probably revolt too.
Egypt: "I will become the great African empire I once was!"
Tunisia: "Nope!"
Tunisia was socialist from independence until 1987, probably will neutral or ally of USSR.
0:56 really
The dislikes are the Communist in the comments trying to learn russian on duo lingo
If you want some clarification of what happened, reply to this comment saying what part you do not manage to understand or want further info about.
Yeah, I want a clarification from 0:00 to 4:26
Why is this so fucking horrible?
Why did Transcarpathia ceded to Czechslovakia?
AirZazi
It was initially to be given to Hungary, but since Hungary staid loyal to the Soviets it was ceded to Czechoslovakia as a "gift" for rising up against the Soviet control.
Drex
I see...
jope drex, como desde España se dio la vuelta a la tortilla
2:37 I just hear "go NATO go" every time
I always liked how the Western people imagine war. Like in cheap action movies. First one side of the conflict (in the representation of Western man "evil/bad guys") wins a solid victory, and then, suddenly, good guys (in the representation of Western man) fights back and winning. It is ridiculous.
Wtf are you talking bpabiut
Дмитрий Тарасюк Planes beat commie trucks full of supplies.
1) in the 1960s, commie had one of the best aviation in the world. So who will beat whom - this is another question.
2) Look at 2.07. Germany and France are defeated. Who defeated the Warsaw Pact? Of worthy opponents, there remained only England. In real life, in this case, England would settle on its island and protect them.
England would not even try to carry out the offensive. How England did this during the Second World War. About Spain, I generally keep quiet - seriously perceive Spain is simply ridiculous. The United States would not have been able to send as many amphibious forces into Europe as it could to keep the entire European front. The US simply did not have enough transport ships for this. So... WHO could defeat the Communists from 2.07?
This video just does not make sense. Either the commie lose earlier, or the commie do not lose at all. The scenario described in the video is absolutely stupid and unrealistic.
Дмитрий Тарасюк no it aint
Дмитрий Тарасюк Considering this guy is clearly not Western, because of his English, that argument makes no sense.
All those dislikes are probably from Russians and people who saw their country die before watching the entire video
Yeah, fuckign nationalists...
Comment percentages
90% SWItZeRLaNd!!!???!!111
9% wow Spain just wow/ WHAT A COMEBACK
1% noice vid/other
See that awkward white smudge in Europe?
That's Switzerland #neutral
Some Random guy Andorra too but something was Weird
Yes y?
2:23
La reconquista
ElMIKI Spain saved Portugal
Spain saved Europe from Islamism and communism, based Spain
2:21 biggtest comeback in human history
It's like a cancer spreading fast inside the body only to be destroyed quickly by some unknown treatments
Well, I was going to ask what was with the couple months waiting without doing anything, but then I looked at the date and realized.Clever. Clever.
How was it clever? I don't get it.
Call me Will
Russian Winter. Lol
That wasn't winter. He spilled white out on the slides.
+JustYourAverageRetro kek
My god, Drex, this is amazing work! I'm tempted to a project like this after seeing what you've come up with! Great work! :)
Go ahead and make it! You'll surely do a great job aswell.
What thing do u use to do the mapping because I want to know
If you guys want to, check out this video, its a shitty map day by day WWI war video I made, up to you if you want to check it out
ruclips.net/video/RvshYwds3b4/видео.html
2:09 *holy music stops*
Switzerland in any WW3 scenario: mm, that's great, someone wanna popcorn?
I would like to see a version of this except in the Caribbean front with America invading Cuba. 🇺🇸🇨🇺
They would’ve won rather easily and invaded it in less than a month
lightning cancer true, however they had USSR troops on the island.
Ryan's games that would be easy because UK and France and the other nations occupied the Soviet Union. Meaning no Communist Support.
It'd last like 3 hours.
Edit: the war not the video.
I hope cuba just became. Capitalists and not die
WOW. This is one of the best WW 3 scenarios ever. Honestly, I couldn't understand why there would be hate on this (except all this ultra nationalists maybe...they hate everything). Excellent video!
Thanks :D
I don't hate it im sad cuba i died 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
Bruh in every single one of these it reaches a certain point then apparently the ussr gives up and starts retreating?! That is total bs even if it is alternative.
Every one does this in alternative ww3, Russia invades most of Europe, then apparently Spain is a super power and wins magically.
Galaxy Red
It’s overused tbh. Russia invaded half the world and dies. Each and every ww3 video
GalaxyRed it takes time for the US to mobilize, and ussr can’t supply the troops in france cuz it’s too far
One of the best simulations ever made.
Worst ever LOL
*Russian Fanboy exposed*
One of the most unrealistic simulations ever made for both sides.
This is one of, if not the best, Cold War WW3 scenarious I have ever seen. You earned a Sub. Great work.
[Spolier alert!]
2:09 was the point where Spain managed to successfully counterattack the Russians
... *And so did NATO*
“Army 500 000 men”
Here goes seccond mustace man
What an amazing job! Great video!
O_O AMAZING! One of your best works! If it wasn't for the AH i would thought this was an EmperorTigerstar Vid!!! Btw how many frames??
914.
2:17 when America arrives
but America is in nato
ElijahTheKing ! I think you didnt understand what he/she said
America wouldn’t of changed very much
@Big Fish American equipment is superior meanwhile the ussr is probably pulling ww2 T-34s out of their ass.
RIP USSR and its Warsaw pact
Some corrections:
1-Some territories of Yugoslavia would be annexed by the invaders, such as Kosovo to Albania, Macedonia to Bulgaria and Vojvodina to Hungary.
2-Israel would not be dominated easily, it would probably have been the same as the Six Day War, and then it would have turned into a bloody conflict without any progress.
3-Turkey and Iran would not be easily invaded either, as they have mountains and a powerful army.
4-San Marino, Andorra and Cyprus would not have been invaded, as they do not have any strategic value.
5-The war would end up becoming nuclear, whether when France saw that defeat was imminent, and especially when NATO forces began to enter Soviet territory, the USSR would use nuclear weapons as a last resort.
What did we learn kids?
Quantity is *NOT* Quality, and the casualities of the WWII spell it VERY well
I think it's awesome.
Thank you ^^
@@drex6347 did cuba die or become capitalist
@@erithp.6319 it probably became a pro-US state after this war
a pacific version of this would be interesting to see. Maybe you can do it on it's 2nd year anniversary?
Aw crap, I have to do a video in nine days (at the date of the reply)?
I'd better write the whole timeline.
Ww3 starts
Russia conquers most of Europe
Russia:Europe is gonna be mine
2:21 America enters Europe
Nato wins
In the end, Galicja and Lviv are Polish.
Had that happened, a decent part of Silesia and Pomerania (in 1965 most of the Poles living there were Galacians who would've it as going home), probably up to Danzig with Poland getting Königsberg instead, would have been given to Germany.
@@TPTGopher Good Time men
Ussr : Failed to invade spain
Napoleon : Look at this ameteur!
3:17 Operation Barbarossa II
Operation Barbarossa II: Electric Bogaloo
@@aname5909 But this time the russian enimy have oil.
What is the name of the song that starts at 1:21?
virtiuous by mark petrie whats the one at 0:00
Unknown Gaming "the raven" by Ryan Amon.
Not realistic
Fun fact: I was just waiting that some fucking Russian will come and say "This is not realistic, ofcourse not, Russia stronk, Russia great, yeeh yeeh!". Pasho nahui, blyat.
Ranchy HD Mapping DELETED
Ranchy HD Mapping DELETED
Шмель ЁПТА no shit, the war didn't happen
Finnish Neo-Nazi scumbag.
!Mistake!
In Peace Treaty is:"Stettin and Kaliningrad are given to Germany",but Stettin is still in Poland.
It is, the border was moved to the Oder river.
The only reason why the advance from the Vistula to the Moskva was too fast (e.g. March 21 to May 30) was because of overextension in the Soviet armed forces after losing so much men in the battle for Europe.
The Warsaw Pact would have never advanced all the way to Spain and wouldn’t capitulate Greece and Turkey. Also why would they invade neutral Sweden, Finland and Yugoslavia?
Spain was the last Nato Member. And it's like
Spain: Don't mess Portugal and France!
Well this scenario probably didn't include the nations using nuclear weapons?
Killjoy45. Mass destruction. No one would win
what program you used to make this video i want to make a video like that too
Every Warsaw Pact vs NATO video:
1. USSR takes over Europe
2. USA starts an offensive in Africa
3. USA magically finds 15million soldiers to start a massive invasion in France and/or Scandinavia.
4. Soviet Union collapses like wet shit
5. Soviet casualties: 40M
US casualties: 400-500k
Pretty much......and I wonder how in every darn scenario, they somehow seem to manage to avoid the use of nuclear weapons entirely.....the risk for that would have always grown bigger when the other side would have been cornered....which is why these kind of scenarios are unrealistic in the first place and why Cold War never heated up into WW3.
Total Crap... not just incredible unrealistic in multiple ways at once, in addition to that you draw random frontiers without any explaination why you think that thinks could have happened in that way.... Waste of time to watch. Give explaination and there might open up some interessting discussion topic but not like that.
UNREALISTIC besides the Soviet Union had global domination in common with the Nazis. They never did it cuz America was a thing (and like the soviets, had a lot of atom bombs) with them around its like 2 bullies afraid to fight each other cuz neither of em wanna get hurt
не реалистично, через 48 после начала заварушки согласно военной доктрине ссср, танки должны стоят уже рядом с ла-маншем, и по факту ничего не остановило бы продвижение войск ссср, ну кроме ядерного оружия :-)
Американцы не умеют мыслить объективно, они умеют только фантазировать)
PYCCKU = XYNTA
Согласен. Испания бы не смогла остановить наступление красной армии после капитуляции Франции
0:42 they conquered turkey in one day
Switzerland: Nice Show
I don't get it why are countries like Spain, Austria, Sweden and Yugoslavia involved. Realistically they've stayed neutral.
@Bosnia sucks just as much as he hated the west and liberalism, not an argument
0:26 I would hope to god it never happened lmao
Indeed, no one likes war.
By the way, I had the intention to abandon the project, but when I saw your own WW3 every day, I thought "Whoah, this looks so damn great, I'll definetely continue with my own".
Drex Glad I could help I guess
TheTerrorByte probably will happen with north Korea causing it
how is it that nato won? i thought warsaw pact was stronger in the 1960's. great video btw
Initially, eventually the USA's industry would kick in, I'd imagine conscription would be implemented aswell.
What about Polish/Russian/German industry?
Szczepaniak Robert What made the USA so powerful was that it was never involved in a costly war as the Second World War. As a result of that, the USA's industry wasn't as badly damaged as USSRs, Polands or rest of Eastern Europe.
Yes, but RWPG rebuilt local industry. Polish ships sails on all oceans of the world. Russian industry sent a man into the space.
Szczepaniak Robert Yes they did that, but USA had a high GDP which = more tanks, more weaponry, and better trained soldiers.
4:18 like that's ever going to happened and Greece would join Warsaw pact
Yeah I know just Bullshit fellow historian
That damn encirclement near Paris at 2:27
It fucking got me
Algeria: You know what i'm being like Switzerland
Switzerland: Want to eat popcorn with me
Algeria: Sure
1:30 Russia takes revenge against Napoleon after 150 years xD
But I tkink, that this scenario would be so good. Western Europe would feel for a year what felt Eastern Europe during 45 years, and I like vision after war, much better that real 1991.
But russia won napoleonic wars back then, so its not revenge
To tje ones who thought Warsaw pact will emerge victorious, let me explain why they will always lose
ALL Warsaw pact members have a significantly smaller economies than their western counterparts, during the 60's the US economy was reaching the point, where its economy was nearly twice the soviet economy, during the 70's Japan claimed silver in the worlds largest Economy, surpassing the combined economy of Warsaw Pact, also, the USSR has a numerous amount of Minor ethnic groups, some hate the rule of Moscow, not only that, the USSR, despite having a larger population than USA, it doesn't have the resources to win a long war surpassing 2 years, a year long conflict was deemed the best scenario for the soviets, taking in how they lasted longer during WW2 the answer is simple
Lend Lease Program, that's right, the USSR survived WW2, because of the Lend lease Program, 15% of all equipment the USSR used, came from the USA, doesn't seem much, how about the 60% of all steel the USSR used came drom USA, over 80% of all food the soviet populace ate was US war rations, in other words, it was the US that kept the USSR from starving to death, and helped out produce the Germans.
Now how does this affect the soviets 20 years later?
The soviets actually placed a Strict economy rule, if you don't make the required production, the Government will give you resources, meaning, to increase the production, the Soviet's had to throw tons of resources, and the plant managers can always find ways to make the plant under perform, this was a problem that the Communist party failed to find a solution, as the Communist party relied on them
In other words, the soviet economy was ill-suited to support a war, yhe industrial sector was doing fine, the Agricultural sector has much to be desired from, and the Army, was using T-55 tanks as the Main tank, the T-62 failed and the T-64 was reserver for elite units, ehich there are very few of, as the Soviets conscripted men into the Army
I physically laughed my ass off when the USSR blitzkrieg’d the entire Europe
I did with the whole video.
And for some reason Spain was a secret superpower and kicked ussr’s ass.
*LOGIC HAS BEEN THROWN OUT THE WINDOW APPARENTLY*
@@galaxyred7 1. Spain is not the only one fighting, American troops and nato troops are there fighting with Spain
2. The supply range is very stretched so that frontline is not supplied enough
3. The Soviet Union was at the verge of collapse so it added more problems to the moral of troops.
4. Don’t say this isn’t realistic because look at Ww2 the Germans basically took all of Europe and they still lost.
Spain:NO ONE EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION! *proceeds to Invade Normandy Again*
There is an error in your video. When the city of Istanbul is captured, Turkey loses the war, but our capital has been Ankara since 1923. In other words, for Turkey to be defeated, Ankara must be captured.
2:23 Nice
Wanted USSR to win...
Its warsaw pact not only USSR
@Demetre shut up
@@JaxFactsSHIT UP AMERICAN GEBBELS
СССР наоборот победил бы.Самые сильные войска и лучшая техника в те времена была у СССР.
В 3 Мировой победителей нет !!! Одна ядерная пустыня !!!
OHO zombie tupoi.
Leonard Vartic хи сэй тру.
+++ полностью согласен, совок в соло мог разъебать всех, даже без варшавского пакта
What do u say?
Warsaw pact:*defeats whole europe*
Spain:*hack activated*
Ikr, I know it’s unrealistic, but the video needs have a bit of sense in it to make it enjoyable!
How the hell did Spain turn into a superpower as soon as the Soviets arrived?!
@@galaxyred7 They played despacito
NATO was able to invade Russia because they actually stopped during the winter.
2:28 👌 in france
Not sure what all the dislikes are for (unless some people would really love to live in a communist world), but I honestly love this. Liked and favorited, thanks for the vid
Thanks ^^
Honestly I think communism is a scam. Nothing is fair, only your paychecks. And I don’t fancy the government mothering me. Just watch the hunger games
>doesnt understand anything about communism
in spain every time the same thing happens the people revolts and destroy the army from the invasior.
Switzerland: Will you fuckers just stop fucking fighting already....
there is no way NATO land army could ever match the USSR or the WP
I wanna see one with a Warsaw Pact victory next :3
You think the war would take a year? Ww2 took longer then that. Don't give me this crap, bub.
It could have taken an hour.
What is the name of the first music?
The Raven By Ryan Amon
GOD BLESS YOU MAN, REALLY, THANKS
Darude Sandstorm
Let me guess, dumb Soviets overstretched supply lines.
I'm getting WW1 nostalgia
NATO was smart and waited until winter was over to finish off the Soviets unlike the Germans
germans had to invade the soviets as they ran out of oil. idiot
2:55 Nuclear war begins
Nope, in reality, nuclear war will start way before conventional war starts, that stems from different military doctrines of NATO and WP/WTO, Americans, British, and French would only use tactical nukes on the last resort basis to stop the advance of Soviet tank formations, Soviets on other hand is willing to escalate the conventional war into a nuclear one "earlier," they were planning to drop nukes on Denmark, West Germany, Austria, and northern Italy before WP armored and mechanized units advance.
I like how Ireland Declares war for the meme
Red Allert 2 ??? =)
Fun fact: During the 1980s, people had enough nuclear weapons to destroy about. 1.6 to 3.q%
No one understands what you're trying to get at.
Only U
We all have to remember before bitching. "Quality over quantity"
tell that to whoever has to fight 20 million soviet soldiers
nato
nato