Thanks for putting out a video with so much interesting technical detail. It's a real pleasure to get this kind of insight into your day-to-day engineering challenges. For those of us who are fascinated by the engineering involved but whose work is much more mundane, it's a real pleasure to be able to get this kind of running development log. Thanks, kudos, and keep up the amazing work, we're all behind you.
For some reason everyone thinks that nuclear fusion must have physical criteria only as in the fusion bomb? There are other ways of nuclear fusion that are not of the explosive type. Everyone has nuclear fusion in the solar corona in front of their eyes, but everyone obeys dogma, wrong scientific theory, and doesn't want to see the obvious. Nuclear fusion in the core of the Sun is an assumption. This assumption is not actually proven by anything. Nuclear fusion in the solar corona is proven by facts, which I set out in the video clip. For 70 years there is no result - no commercial fusion reactor. Isn't this already pseudoscience? There won't be a commercial fusion reactor for another 70 years or more. Investors and governments need to understand that they keep putting a lot of money into a failed project with a 70-year history of developing a commercial fusion reactor. They will never get a commercial fusion reactor. Because the developers have a wrong understanding of the necessary physical conditions for nuclear fusion in the reactor, to produce commercial heat. I will transfer the technology of a new method of nuclear fusion (fusion project #2) free of charge, under an agreement (contract). Remuneration according to the results. There will be an appendix to the contract, where the physical phenomenon and technology will be described. And until a small prototype of a commercial fusion reactor works, until it shows commercial heat, no one pays me. There is no deception here. The result is a prototype, small commercial fusion reactor I can make myself, in 1-2 years, depends on funding and speed of manufacturing. ruclips.net/video/91NOjCePzd/видео.html I Почему-то все думают, что ядерный синтез должен иметь физические критерии только как в термоядерной бомбе? Есть другие способы ядерного синтеза, не взрывного типа. У всех перед глазами ядерный синтез в солнечной короне, но все подчиняются догме, неправильной научной теории, и не хотят видеть очевидное. Ядерный синтез в ядре Солнца - это предположение. Это предположение ничем фактически не доказано. Ядерный синтез в солнечной короне доказан фактами, их я изложил в видео ролике. ruclips.net/video/91NOjCePzd/видео.htmlI 70 лет нет результата - нет коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Разве это уже не лженаука? Ещё лет 70 и более не будет коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Инвесторам и правительствам надо понять, что они продолжают вкладывать большие деньги в провальный проект с 70-летней историей по разработке коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Они никогда не получат коммерческий термоядерный реактор. Потому что у разработчиков неправильное понимание необходимых физических условий для ядерного синтеза в реакторе, для получения коммерческого тепла. Я передам технологию нового способа ядерного синтеза (проект синтеза №2) бесплатно, по договору (контракту). Вознаграждение по результатам. К контракту будет приложение, где будет описано физическое явление и технология. И пока не заработает небольшой прототип коммерческого термоядерного реактора, пока не покажет коммерческое тепло, никто мне не платит. Здесь нет обмана. Результат - прототип, небольшой коммерческий термоядерный реактор могу сделать сам, за 1-2 года, зависит от финансирования и скорости изготовления.
@@tokamakenergy6400 I am the author of the third method of achieving nuclear fusion, this is the repetition of physical conditions as in the solar corona. In 6 months there will be a small prototype of a commercial fusion reactor. A commercial fusion reactor in 1-2 years! Power 100 kW. For many years (almost 25 years) I have been convincing scientists that thermonuclear fusion in the Sun occurs not in the core of the Sun, but in the solar corona !!! But scientists are very stubborn, and do not want to believe the obvious. Why are scientists not accepting new breakthrough scientific ideas? There is an assumption, accepted by most scientists, that thermonuclear fusion in the Sun occurs in the Sun's core. But no one has ever actually confirmed this. This is just a guess, the fantasy of an authoritative physicist. Scientists are currently using two methods to achieve nuclear fusion: inertial confinement and magnetic confinement. But there is also a third method of achieving nuclear fusion, this is the repetition of physical conditions as in the solar corona. Nobody is using this third method to achieve nuclear fusion? In 6 months there will be a small prototype of a commercial fusion reactor. A commercial fusion reactor in 1-2 years! I propose a technology transfer for a commercial fusion reactor under a contract. Thermonuclear fusion in the Sun - a new version. n-t.ru/tp/ie/ts.htm ruclips.net/video/izCALj848xU/видео.html
Really appreciate the regular updates from Tokamak Energy. I've been following fusion prospects for more than forty years -- before the start of JET -- and it's really exciting to now see commercial ventures like TE coming on in leaps and bounds. The HTS ReBCO tapes and now the technically challenging divertor are starting to make compact fusion look like a genuinely practical possibility. Looking forward to the progress over the next few years.
@@Whipster-Old yep they usually are, this on takes advantage (or rather will) of new engineering in magnet tech which means you can run higher fields which means smaller reactors for the same output which means they're significantly smaller and thus easier to make which leads to them being faster produce at significantly lower costs - think ITER's the entire planet coming together to fund the project and it taking decades versus this one company with effectively startup money in a few years.
Really exciting to see you taking a more aggressive approach on development schedules. Can you draw any positives from the recent MAST diverter results and increased confidence in achieving your target temperatures?. Look forwards to the next video.
There are self-stablising plasmas that can avoid the problems of plasma instability, but are surprisingly cheap to set up. Loosely, you want to reduce the system current or you'll be swung by the formed unstable arc mode plasma, and the general relation of `A/m^2 = C/m^3 * m/s`, namely where `A/m^2` is proportional to `m/s`, such that `C/m^3` doesn't really change since you can't really increase the amount of coulombs in a unit mass. This tends towards a particular design that does not need containment magnets, nor a tokamak design. The hint here is anode tufting.
We wanted to get the divertor upgrade done when we were upgrading other systems on ST40, so that we could get on with the 100 million degree campaign with an enhanced machine. We didn't want to delay the campaign.
I believe that you will be able to engineer the technology necessary to give us clean and cheap energy, enough to end poverty and reverse climate change. Please don't screw us over by profiteering from our vulnerabilities and submitting to the powers that be.
For some reason everyone thinks that nuclear fusion must have physical criteria only as in the fusion bomb? There are other ways of nuclear fusion that are not of the explosive type. Everyone has nuclear fusion in the solar corona in front of their eyes, but everyone obeys dogma, wrong scientific theory, and doesn't want to see the obvious. Nuclear fusion in the core of the Sun is an assumption. This assumption is not actually proven by anything. Nuclear fusion in the solar corona is proven by facts, which I set out in the video clip. For 70 years there is no result - no commercial fusion reactor. Isn't this already pseudoscience? There won't be a commercial fusion reactor for another 70 years or more. Investors and governments need to understand that they keep putting a lot of money into a failed project with a 70-year history of developing a commercial fusion reactor. They will never get a commercial fusion reactor. Because the developers have a wrong understanding of the necessary physical conditions for nuclear fusion in the reactor, to produce commercial heat. I will transfer the technology of a new method of nuclear fusion (fusion project #2) free of charge, under an agreement (contract). Remuneration according to the results. There will be an appendix to the contract, where the physical phenomenon and technology will be described. And until a small prototype of a commercial fusion reactor works, until it shows commercial heat, no one pays me. There is no deception here. The result is a prototype, small commercial fusion reactor I can make myself, in 1-2 years, depends on funding and speed of manufacturing. ruclips.net/video/91NOjCePzd/видео.html I Почему-то все думают, что ядерный синтез должен иметь физические критерии только как в термоядерной бомбе? Есть другие способы ядерного синтеза, не взрывного типа. У всех перед глазами ядерный синтез в солнечной короне, но все подчиняются догме, неправильной научной теории, и не хотят видеть очевидное. Ядерный синтез в ядре Солнца - это предположение. Это предположение ничем фактически не доказано. Ядерный синтез в солнечной короне доказан фактами, их я изложил в видео ролике. ruclips.net/video/91NOjCePzd/видео.htmlI 70 лет нет результата - нет коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Разве это уже не лженаука? Ещё лет 70 и более не будет коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Инвесторам и правительствам надо понять, что они продолжают вкладывать большие деньги в провальный проект с 70-летней историей по разработке коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Они никогда не получат коммерческий термоядерный реактор. Потому что у разработчиков неправильное понимание необходимых физических условий для ядерного синтеза в реакторе, для получения коммерческого тепла. Я передам технологию нового способа ядерного синтеза (проект синтеза №2) бесплатно, по договору (контракту). Вознаграждение по результатам. К контракту будет приложение, где будет описано физическое явление и технология. И пока не заработает небольшой прототип коммерческого термоядерного реактора, пока не покажет коммерческое тепло, никто мне не платит. Здесь нет обмана. Результат - прототип, небольшой коммерческий термоядерный реактор могу сделать сам, за 1-2 года, зависит от финансирования и скорости изготовления.
Really tight space inside! 😳😮👏👏👏 congratulations for all the team!! 👏👏
This is fascinating thank you for giving us this unprecedented access. I’m wishing you all the best luck. #TeamFusion #UK
Good luck with the next campaign! We're looking forward to it. Please don't forget to do a video on the diagnostics.
Thanks. We'll try!
Thanks for putting out a video with so much interesting technical detail. It's a real pleasure to get this kind of insight into your day-to-day engineering challenges. For those of us who are fascinated by the engineering involved but whose work is much more mundane, it's a real pleasure to be able to get this kind of running development log. Thanks, kudos, and keep up the amazing work, we're all behind you.
Great video. Hope you get to 100 million degrees soon ☀️
Thanks! We hope so too!
For some reason everyone thinks that nuclear fusion must have physical criteria only as in the fusion bomb? There are other ways of nuclear fusion that are not of the explosive type. Everyone has nuclear fusion in the solar corona in front of their eyes, but everyone obeys dogma, wrong scientific theory, and doesn't want to see the obvious. Nuclear fusion in the core of the Sun is an assumption. This assumption is not actually proven by anything. Nuclear fusion in the solar corona is proven by facts, which I set out in the video clip. For 70 years there is no result - no commercial fusion reactor. Isn't this already pseudoscience? There won't be a commercial fusion reactor for another 70 years or more. Investors and governments need to understand that they keep putting a lot of money into a failed project with a 70-year history of developing a commercial fusion reactor. They will never get a commercial fusion reactor. Because the developers have a wrong understanding of the necessary physical conditions for nuclear fusion in the reactor, to produce commercial heat. I will transfer the technology of a new method of nuclear fusion (fusion project #2) free of charge, under an agreement (contract). Remuneration according to the results. There will be an appendix to the contract, where the physical phenomenon and technology will be described. And until a small prototype of a commercial fusion reactor works, until it shows commercial heat, no one pays me. There is no deception here. The result is a prototype, small commercial fusion reactor I can make myself, in 1-2 years, depends on funding and speed of manufacturing. ruclips.net/video/91NOjCePzd/видео.html I
Почему-то все думают, что ядерный синтез должен иметь физические критерии только как в термоядерной бомбе? Есть другие способы ядерного синтеза, не взрывного типа. У всех перед глазами ядерный синтез в солнечной короне, но все подчиняются догме, неправильной научной теории, и не хотят видеть очевидное. Ядерный синтез в ядре Солнца - это предположение. Это предположение ничем фактически не доказано. Ядерный синтез в солнечной короне доказан фактами, их я изложил в видео ролике. ruclips.net/video/91NOjCePzd/видео.htmlI 70 лет нет результата - нет коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Разве это уже не лженаука? Ещё лет 70 и более не будет коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Инвесторам и правительствам надо понять, что они продолжают вкладывать большие деньги в провальный проект с 70-летней историей по разработке коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Они никогда не получат коммерческий термоядерный реактор. Потому что у разработчиков неправильное понимание необходимых физических условий для ядерного синтеза в реакторе, для получения коммерческого тепла. Я передам технологию нового способа ядерного синтеза (проект синтеза №2) бесплатно, по договору (контракту). Вознаграждение по результатам. К контракту будет приложение, где будет описано физическое явление и технология. И пока не заработает небольшой прототип коммерческого термоядерного реактора, пока не покажет коммерческое тепло, никто мне не платит. Здесь нет обмана. Результат - прототип, небольшой коммерческий термоядерный реактор могу сделать сам, за 1-2 года, зависит от финансирования и скорости изготовления.
That was super interesting. Thanks for making this awesome documentaries.
Glad you enjoyed it! :-)
@@tokamakenergy6400 I am the author of the third method of achieving nuclear fusion, this is the repetition of physical conditions as in the solar corona. In 6 months there will be a small prototype of a commercial fusion reactor. A commercial fusion reactor in 1-2 years! Power 100 kW.
For many years (almost 25 years) I have been convincing scientists that thermonuclear fusion in the Sun occurs not in the core of the Sun, but in the solar corona !!! But scientists are very stubborn, and do not want to believe the obvious. Why are scientists not accepting new breakthrough scientific ideas? There is an assumption, accepted by most scientists, that thermonuclear fusion in the Sun occurs in the Sun's core. But no one has ever actually confirmed this. This is just a guess, the fantasy of an authoritative physicist. Scientists are currently using two methods to achieve nuclear fusion: inertial confinement and magnetic confinement. But there is also a third method of achieving nuclear fusion, this is the repetition of physical conditions as in the solar corona. Nobody is using this third method to achieve nuclear fusion? In 6 months there will be a small prototype of a commercial fusion reactor. A commercial fusion reactor in 1-2 years! I propose a technology transfer for a commercial fusion reactor under a contract. Thermonuclear fusion in the Sun - a new version. n-t.ru/tp/ie/ts.htm ruclips.net/video/izCALj848xU/видео.html
11:19 that fan should keep the temps nice and manageable
Looking forward to 100 million degrees!
I'm looking forward on this! Made an essay for my semestral college workabout fusion and fission energy
Really appreciate the regular updates from Tokamak Energy. I've been following fusion prospects for more than forty years -- before the start of JET -- and it's really exciting to now see commercial ventures like TE coming on in leaps and bounds. The HTS ReBCO tapes and now the technically challenging divertor are starting to make compact fusion look like a genuinely practical possibility. Looking forward to the progress over the next few years.
Great to see so much detail on progress! Looking forward to hearing about the trials
Lets gooo guys 100 million degrees plasma achieved!!! Job well done! Can you please do an update video like this one?
Phenomenal work especially in Covid.
Nice vidéo!
Merci
Seeing people inside the tokamak is quite jarring. I suppose I picture them as massive, and it shattered my illusion.
The ITER is massive. The whole point of theirs is to hit the break-even at a smaller size. And this is yet smaller then the target one.
@@Maverickx89 it's pretty awesome. I understand it logically, but still jarring to see.
@@Whipster-Old yep they usually are, this on takes advantage (or rather will) of new engineering in magnet tech which means you can run higher fields which means smaller reactors for the same output which means they're significantly smaller and thus easier to make which leads to them being faster produce at significantly lower costs - think ITER's the entire planet coming together to fund the project and it taking decades versus this one company with effectively startup money in a few years.
What is the expected total neutron flux
Really exciting to see you taking a more aggressive approach on development schedules. Can you draw any positives from the recent MAST diverter results and increased confidence in achieving your target temperatures?. Look forwards to the next video.
I hope we can crack the fusion energy puzzle in our lifetime, it will change everything.
There are self-stablising plasmas that can avoid the problems of plasma instability, but are surprisingly cheap to set up.
Loosely, you want to reduce the system current or you'll be swung by the formed unstable arc mode plasma, and the general relation of `A/m^2 = C/m^3 * m/s`, namely where `A/m^2` is proportional to `m/s`, such that `C/m^3` doesn't really change since you can't really increase the amount of coulombs in a unit mass.
This tends towards a particular design that does not need containment magnets, nor a tokamak design. The hint here is anode tufting.
Just to clarify, what do you mean by the "major upgrade? Why was it cancelled?
Nice upgrade! When will you achive 100 million degrees do you think?
And when will you start building ST-F1?
when will this tokamak be viable to generate power?
Why the tight schedule all out of the sudden, especially considering possible risks?
I guess that when you work on private funding you can't lose time, as is often done in academia.
We wanted to get the divertor upgrade done when we were upgrading other systems on ST40, so that we could get on with the 100 million degree campaign with an enhanced machine. We didn't want to delay the campaign.
It's like Wintergatan machine, but slightly more complex. No chance for strangers from discord to contribute X)
limit cycle plasma formations
Catch yall in 20 years.
Why wait that long?
Will you guys make something that isn't "20 years away"?
im sure this wont be taken seriously, i have some demonstrations i have created and recorded i would love to share
I believe that you will be able to engineer the technology necessary to give us clean and cheap energy, enough to end poverty and reverse climate change. Please don't screw us over by profiteering from our vulnerabilities and submitting to the powers that be.
Seeing my comment denied and constructive criticism be neglected I can definitely say this is just Propaganda ^ ^
Negationism it's a bad trend.
For some reason everyone thinks that nuclear fusion must have physical criteria only as in the fusion bomb? There are other ways of nuclear fusion that are not of the explosive type. Everyone has nuclear fusion in the solar corona in front of their eyes, but everyone obeys dogma, wrong scientific theory, and doesn't want to see the obvious. Nuclear fusion in the core of the Sun is an assumption. This assumption is not actually proven by anything. Nuclear fusion in the solar corona is proven by facts, which I set out in the video clip. For 70 years there is no result - no commercial fusion reactor. Isn't this already pseudoscience? There won't be a commercial fusion reactor for another 70 years or more. Investors and governments need to understand that they keep putting a lot of money into a failed project with a 70-year history of developing a commercial fusion reactor. They will never get a commercial fusion reactor. Because the developers have a wrong understanding of the necessary physical conditions for nuclear fusion in the reactor, to produce commercial heat. I will transfer the technology of a new method of nuclear fusion (fusion project #2) free of charge, under an agreement (contract). Remuneration according to the results. There will be an appendix to the contract, where the physical phenomenon and technology will be described. And until a small prototype of a commercial fusion reactor works, until it shows commercial heat, no one pays me. There is no deception here. The result is a prototype, small commercial fusion reactor I can make myself, in 1-2 years, depends on funding and speed of manufacturing. ruclips.net/video/91NOjCePzd/видео.html I
Почему-то все думают, что ядерный синтез должен иметь физические критерии только как в термоядерной бомбе? Есть другие способы ядерного синтеза, не взрывного типа. У всех перед глазами ядерный синтез в солнечной короне, но все подчиняются догме, неправильной научной теории, и не хотят видеть очевидное. Ядерный синтез в ядре Солнца - это предположение. Это предположение ничем фактически не доказано. Ядерный синтез в солнечной короне доказан фактами, их я изложил в видео ролике. ruclips.net/video/91NOjCePzd/видео.htmlI 70 лет нет результата - нет коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Разве это уже не лженаука? Ещё лет 70 и более не будет коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Инвесторам и правительствам надо понять, что они продолжают вкладывать большие деньги в провальный проект с 70-летней историей по разработке коммерческого термоядерного реактора. Они никогда не получат коммерческий термоядерный реактор. Потому что у разработчиков неправильное понимание необходимых физических условий для ядерного синтеза в реакторе, для получения коммерческого тепла. Я передам технологию нового способа ядерного синтеза (проект синтеза №2) бесплатно, по договору (контракту). Вознаграждение по результатам. К контракту будет приложение, где будет описано физическое явление и технология. И пока не заработает небольшой прототип коммерческого термоядерного реактора, пока не покажет коммерческое тепло, никто мне не платит. Здесь нет обмана. Результат - прототип, небольшой коммерческий термоядерный реактор могу сделать сам, за 1-2 года, зависит от финансирования и скорости изготовления.